Adolescent development

profileAditya Roy
DS502WeekFiveMultipleIdentities.pptx

Week Five: Multiple Identities

Theoretical Foundations

Erikson

Vygotsky

Erikson and Identity Development

Stage theory

Successful resolution of “crises”

Self-deprecating instead of self-appreciating

Ego syntonic vs. ego dystonic

Critique of Erikson

Mastering a crisis is not an all or nothing event

Does not consider the notion of multiple identities

Vygotsky

Sociocultural Theory

Shifts the focus of developmental influences to include the social and cultural environment

Human behavior cannot be understood without understanding culture

Dissertation on Hamlet: Narrative approach

Connections to Child Life

Influence of socialism

The hand creates the mind (theory of activity)

Shared cognition (zone of proximal development)

Development happens as children resolve conflicting elements (equilibration)

The Cultural Context of Learning

Enculturation is not something that happens to children; it is something they do (“We do culture”)

Culture = customs, symbols, social settings, physical settings, and objects (for example, cell phones)

Culture organizes experience (We can’t understand learning without understanding the high school)

Becomes the foundation for Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model

The Zone of Proximal Development

The zone is collective, not individual

Interactions in the zone do not need to be verbal

Most learning happens at the child-society border

Learning drives development (in contrast to Piaget who believed development drives learning)

Gender Role Overview

Sex=biological identity, or better yet “assigned gender”. People may be less binary than we previously believed

Gender= social and cultural identity. Created by expectations and cultural norms

Gender Differences

Males and females are far more psychologically similar than they are different

Cultural and social practices account for most of the differences

Gender role stereotypes becomes cognitive filters that confirm pre-existing belief systems

Ex. Parents attribute son’s successes in math to ability but credits daughter’s success to hard work

Ex. Teachers steer girls toward humanities but conclude that girls are less interested in STEM subjects

Gender Socialization

By ages 2-3, kids seem to know a lot about gender expectations. Gender segregation occurs by age 2 and continues into adulthood.

By ages 3-7, gender transgressions are not easily accepted. Increased tolerance after age 8.

Adolescence often is a period of gender intensification with a strong affiliation with one’s reference group.

Learning About Gender

Preschoolers learn about positive traits of their assigned gender and the negative traits of “the other” gender

Binary assumptions go unexamined

Parents set expectations for gender conformity

Parents set corrections for gender non-conformity

Gender segregation reinforces perceived differences (categorical dynamics)

Learning About Gender

Reward Learning: Children are rewarded for gender conforming actions

Observational Learning: Children watch others and develop role models

Construct Learning: Children develop internalized constructs of what it means to be male or female, and also learn what is not male or female

Discussion

Is there a case to be made for all girl schools? All boy schools? All girl camps? All girl camps? All girl sports? All boy sports?

Can or should teachers contradict parental messages about gender?

How can we address bullying, teasing, or social isolation of students who do not fit neatly into gender categories?

Racial Identity Development

Erikson and Racial Identity: A Psychoanalytical View

Young people can be remarkably clannish, and cruel in their exclusion of all those who are different in skin color of cultural background. It is important to understand (which does not mean condone or participate in) such intolerance as a defense against a sense of identity confusion

Erik Erikson, Identity, Youth, and Crisis, 1950

Tatum and Racial Identity: A Societal View

Beverly Tatum Why Are All The Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? (Excellent example of a question-based inquiry)

Immersion = finding a cultural secure base (Bowlby). Claiming a “racial center” from which one can make judgements about the world and others

Integrative Awareness = Being aware of various identities and integrating them into a less-fragmented whole

Racial Affinity

Cultural affiliation provides safety, especially in new situations or situations where one is not in the majority

Multiple identities are a necessity for kids navigating both dominant and non-dominant cultures. Multiple identities are a choice for kids who navigate only dominant cultures

The Null Hypothesis

Starts with the assumption that there is no normal

Minimizes the starting point of asking about those who deviate from normal

Increased acceptance of diversity

Rethinking Categories

Categorical differences exist in the real world

Categorical meanings are socially constructed

Two categories are not enough to reflect gender diversity

A gender spectrum vs. gender categories

Racism is Not the Same as Prejudice

Prejudice is a preconceived judgement based on limited information

Racism is a system of advantage based on race

Tatum’s View of Immersion

We need to understand that in racially mixed settings, racial grouping is a developmental process in response to an environmental stressor: racism. Joining with one’s peers for support in the face of stress is a positive coping strategy

Beverly Tatum Why Are All the Black Kids?....

Black, Brown, Caucasian, Asian Categories

The trap of all categorical thinking to minimize in-group differences and to maximize between group differences

Does the difference make a difference?

Whites tend to answer this question “no”

Persons of color tend to answer this question “yes”

Why is this is?

Differential Power and Access Dynamics

Deficit-based model sets up power differentials

Privilege-based model sets up access differentials

Identity Integration?

The need to navigate two cultures

The need to deal with how others define me

The need to deal with negative stereotyping

The need to deal with unequal opportunity

Discussion

How can secondary education settings foster affinity groups?

How do most whites understand the term “racism”? How do most members of non-dominant groups hear this word?

What are the challenges of our current language set about race?

“White privilege” for example

What does school busing achieve?