HN BGFVDSWZZ

DRCfeedbackLE004.docx

Home >Applied Sciences homework help >HN BGFVDSWZZ

DR C: I reviewed your assessment this morning and I am a little confused. I am unclear if this is an organizational policy or a health policy from a government entity. The paper seems to fluctuate between the two. Can you please provide some clarity?

Me: This is a health policy (consent policy). The paper summarizes the policy as described in the assessment instruction as well as speaks to what could happen if the policy is not strictly adhered to. The letter is, however, beckoning for some reconsideration on the part of the policy that relates to research on acute illnesses as the restrictions placed by the policy can have a negative effect on patients who might suffer from these illnesses. I hope this helps.

Rodis, J. F., MD. (2011, August). Consents Policy. Retrieved from

https://www.trinityhealthofne.org/documents/IRB/Consent%20Policy%20RM%202.009.pdf

Dr. C: Thanks for this. I will take another look this weekend.

Me: Thank you!

DR C FEEDBACK: The paper needs to focus on a more legal stand point of a STATE’s HEALTH POLICY. Describe the legal implication of not adhering or adhering to specific health policy. There are other better health policies you can use. I would recommend using a different policy. YOU CAN RUN YOUR POLICY BY BE PRIOR TO WORKING ON THE NEW PAPER

Thank you for your hard work on this. As I mentioned in the discussion board, I am a little confused on this. This seemed to be an organizational policy rather than a health policy. There is some confusion on this though; specifically, your letter addressing a legal issue but it does not seem connected to the paper. If you are looking to get an A for this paper, please refer to the rubric to see how to obtain a maximum point of 3 for each section.

Dr. C

Learning Objective1.1: Describe the issue addressed by a health policy.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Response does not fully or accurately explain the issue addressed by the policy.

Additional Comments: This seemed to be an organizational policy rather than a health policy. There is some confusion on this though; specifically, your letter addressing a legal issue but it does not seem connected to the paper.

REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

Learning Objective 1.2:Explainthe background of the policy formulation.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Adequate background of the policy’s formulation is not provided.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

Learning Objective 2.1:Describe key stakeholders involved in the formulation of a health policy.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Key stakeholders identified include advocacy groups, providers, payers, suppliers, organizations, and consumers, (as appropriate).

Response explains why each identified stakeholder has an interest in this policy.

Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

Learning Objective 2.2: Categorize health policy stakeholders as advocacy groups or business interests.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Stakeholders are accurately placed into two categories: advocacy groups and business interests.

Rationale is provided for the categorizations.

Explanation is provided as to why these categorizations matter.

Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

Learning Objective 2.3: Explain the diverse perspectives of key stakeholders involved in the evolution of the policy.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Response accurately and fairly explains the diverse perspectives of four key stakeholders with regard to the health policy.

Response provides one rationale for each stakeholder perspective.

Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

Learning Objective 3.1: Describe the role of government agencies in the formulation and implementation of a health policy.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Response insufficiently addresses the role of specific government agencies and officials in the formulation of this policy.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

Learning Objective 3.2: Explain the diverse perspectives of the government agencies and officials with regard to the policy.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Response does not adequately and/or accurately explain the diverse perspectives of the government agencies and officials with regard to the policy.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

Learning Objective 4.1: Describe the role of law and regulation in the formulation and implementation of a health policy.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Response identifies fewer than four accurate examples of the role of law and regulation in the formulation and implementation of the health policy.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

Learning Objective 5.1: Identify key organizational stakeholders impacted by a health policy:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Response identifies at least five organizational stakeholders who will be impacted by the policy.

Response provides rationale for selecting these five stakeholders and describes how they will be impacted.

Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

Learning Objective 5.2: Explain the overarching diverse perspectives of the organizational stakeholders with regard to the policy.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Response accurately and fairly explains the diverse perspectives of the organizations and stakeholders with regard to the policy.

Response provides one rationale for each perspective.

Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

Learning Objective 5.3: Analyze the impact of the policy on organizational stakeholders.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Response identifies three areas within the organization that will be most impacted by the policy.

Response provides rationale for selecting these three areas, including a description of how these areas will be impacted.

Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

Learning Objective 6.1: Explain the relevance of a health policy to an organization.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Response provides fewer than three points of relevance of the policy to the organization and/or insufficient rationale.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

Learning Objective 6.2: Describe the expected impact of a policy on organizational outcomes.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Response identifies four organizational outcomes that will be impacted by the health policy.

Response explains how these outcomes will be impacted by the policy.

Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

Written Communication PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American English.

Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively impact readability.

Additional Comments: There were some minor writing issues. REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

Written Communication PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance clarity.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	Writing is consistently well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions are used effectively to enhance clarity, cohesion, and flow.
Additional Comments:

Written Communication PS 1.3: Apply APA style to written work.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are applied correctly and consistently throughout the paper. Sources are consistently cited appropriately and accurately.
Additional Comments:

Critical Thinking PS 5.1: Analyze assumptions and fallacies.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Response clearly and comprehensively assesses the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument.

Response provides a detailed and compelling analysis of implications of fallacies and logical weaknesses in a given argument.

Additional Comments:

Critical Thinking PS 5.2: Generate reasonable and appropriate assumptions.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	Response justifies the reasonableness and need for assumptions in an original argument.
Additional Comments:

Critical Thinking PS 5.3: Assess multiple perspectives and alternatives.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	Response justifies selection of chosen alternative relative to others.
Additional Comments:

Critical Thinking PS 5.4: Use problem-solving skills.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	Response presents compelling supporting arguments for proposed solutions.
Additional Comments:

Information Literacy PS 6.1: Identify credible sources.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	All resources are credible, appropriate, and relevant to the topic.
Additional Comments:

Information Literacy PS 6.2: Analyze findings from relevant sources.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	Analysis clearly reflects relevance of findings to the identified problem, issue, or purpose, and synthesizes findings to generate new insights.
Additional Comments: