Letter Report

profilearodriguez0603
draftletterreport.pdf

draft letter report by angela rodriguez

Submission date: 08-Apr-2021 10:49AM (UTC-0400) Submission ID: 1553688799 File name: var_www_moodle_temp_turnitintool_1223395815.letter_report.doc (34.5K) Word count: 885 Character count: 4840

Remix 1

2

3 4

5

Awk.

6

Missing ","

Article usage

7

8

9

10

Works Cited Help

11

MLA Electronic Resources format

55% SIMILARITY INDEX

6% INTERNET SOURCES

5% PUBLICATIONS

55% STUDENT PAPERS

1 48% 2 5% 3 1%

Exclude quotes Off

Exclude bibliography On

Exclude matches < 3 words

draft letter report ORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to Straighterline Student Paper

Submitted to University of Central Oklahoma Student Paper

www.setravi.df.gob.mx Internet Source

QM

FINAL GRADE

0/100 draft letter report GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

Whoops! It looks like you forgot to quote and cite one or more of your sources!

While I'm sure this was not your intention, please understand that submitting work that is not your own is considered plagiarism and is a violation of our Student Code of Conduct. Additional submissions that use borrowed sources without citation could result in a zero grade and/or additional sanctions.

Please reach out to your Student Advisor if you have questions.

LS

PAGE 1

Remix Similar to a music "remix," this writing appears to combine unchanged content from multiple sources. “Remix” plagiarism happens when words or ideas from multiple sources are brought together without quotations or proper citations. Revise this section by paraphrasing or quoting the author's idea and then properly citing it.

Comment 1

You have a 55% for your originality report. Click on this percentage to see that your own voice is lacking yet. How could revise this to include more of your own voice?

Comment 2 | Content

Missing a date.

Comment 3 | Tone & Style

QM

QM

QM

How could you choose a more specific name instead of being general and broad?

Comment 4 | Content

Missing a subject line. Take a look at the example located on pages 396-397 in your e-text. You can use that as your model as you revise.

Comment 5 | Content

How could you be more specific in your introduction? Again, take a look at the example on pages 396-397.

Awk. | Tone & Style Awkward: The expression or construction is cumbersome or difficult to read. Consider rewriting.

Comment 6 | Organization

This information would be stronger in your introduction above.

Missing "," | Typos Missing comma: Though it may not always be grammatically necessary, a comma can often help to prevent a misreading. When a sentence opens with an introductory element (a phrase, clause or word that is logically related to another phrase or clause in the same sentence), it is a great help to your reader to place a comma after that introductory element. Such phrases will often begin with words like "because," "while" or "although," as in the following example: "While everyone was fighting, the bear wandered away." As you can see, without the comma, the sentence would be confusing. Additional Comment

Offer a comma before your conjunction as well.

Article usage | Typos

Missing an article here. English has two articles: the and a/an. The is used to refer to specific or particular nouns; a/an is used to modify non-specific or non-particular nouns. We call the the definite article and a/an the

Here's a helpful resource:

https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/grammar/using_articles.html

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

QM

QM

Comment 7 | Organization

How could you begin with a topic sentence that is your voice?

Comment 8 | Typos

I am not seeing this resource in your Works Cited page.

Comment 9 | Support

Instead of just stacking evidence, how could you offer your own voice in this paragraph? Use the evidence to support your voice, not overpower it.

PAGE 4

Comment 10 | Content

You have done here with your professional letter closing.

Works Cited Help | Content For each resource in your MLA Works Cited page, pay attention to the smallest of details: what should be italicized? In quotes? Indented? Is there missing information?

https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_works_cited_page_basic_format.html

Additional Comment

You are almost there on your resources. Double check carefully.

Comment 11 | Content

Be sure to alphabetize your list as well.

PAGE 5

MLA Electronic Resources format | Content

For your electronic resources, be sure to also include the doi link and access dates. Here's a helpful resource:

https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_works_cited_electronic_sources.html

PAGE 6

RUBRIC: BUS105_V2 - RUBRIC

CONTENT (20%)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (1)

SATISFACTORY (2)

EXEMPLARY (3)

ORGANIZATION (30%)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (1)

SATISFACTORY (2)

EXEMPLARY (3)

SUPPORT (25%)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (1)

SATISFACTORY (2)

EXEMPLARY (3)

TONE & STYLE (15%)

0 / 3

0 / 3

Adherence to assignment instructions, appropriateness for college level writing.

Many key elements of the assignment unmet. Content not covered in a substantive and/or comprehensive way. Work reflects some confusion with important aspects of the assignment. Student illustrates a lack of understanding and insight of assignment objectives.

All key elements of the assignment are met, but content not always covered in a substantive and/or comprehensive way. Work reflects a solid grasp of each important aspect of the assignment. Student illustrates insight and understanding of assignment objectives.

All key elements of the assignment met. Content is covered in a substantive and comprehensive way with each important aspect of the assignment addressed. Student illustrates insight and understanding of assignment objectives.

0 / 3

Main points are lost to the reader; information is illogically arranged. Paragraph structure needs improvement. Little to no organization apparent.

Main points are clearly stated, but not always supported. Ideas are logically arranged, but sentences and paragraphs are not well-constructed. Organization reflects coherent thought, but transitions are needed to help connect ideas.

Main points are clearly stated and supported. Ideas are logically arranged. Sentences and paragraphs are well-constructed. Organization reflects coherent thought with effective transitions used to connect ideas.

0 / 3

Support and Elaboration

Points are not supported with evidence. Student does not make an effort to anticipate the reader's concerns.

Most points are supported with evidence (facts, statistics when applicable) and examples. Student makes an effort to anticipate the reader’s concerns by offering relevant explanations and clear support for the author’s position.

Main points are supported with effective evidence (facts, statistics when applicable) and examples. Student anticipates the reader’s concerns by offering relevant explanations and clear support for the author’s position.

0 / 3

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (1)

SATISFACTORY (2)

EXEMPLARY (3)

TYPOS (10%)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (1)

SATISFACTORY (2)

EXEMPLARY (3)

Professionalism

Word choice is informal and is not directed towards appropriate audience. Tone and style are not appropriate for assignment. Font type and/or size are not appropriate for assignment. White space is not used effectively.

Word choice is directed towards the appropriate audience, but some issues related to tone and style noted. Font type and size choices may not be appropriate for assignment. White space is used effectively.

Word choice is directed towards the appropriate audience. Tone and style are appropriate for assignment. Professional font type and size for assignment purpose. Effective use of white space.

0 / 3

Grammar/Mechanics: grammar, spellling and punctuation, documentation style where applicable.

Many errors noted in sentence structure and/or spelling. Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation not followed. Documentation style not used or formatting contains several major errors.

Sentences are complete and spelling is correct. Minor grammar, usage, and/or punctuation errors noted. Appropriate documentation style used where applicable with some minor formatting errors.

Sentences are complete and spelling is correct. Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation followed. Appropriate documentation style used where applicable.

  • draft letter report
    • by angela rodriguez
  • draft letter report
    • ORIGINALITY REPORT
    • PRIMARY SOURCES
  • draft letter report
    • GRADEMARK REPORT
      • FINAL GRADE
      • GENERAL COMMENTS
        • Instructor
    • RUBRIC: BUS105_V2 - RUBRIC 0 / 3