5 page assessment due in 24 hours

5/15/2020 Draft CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW Scoring Guide

https://courseroomc.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/PSY-FP/PSY-FP5201/191000/Scoring_Guides/a02_scoring_guide.html 1/2

Draft CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Describe an area of research.

Does not describe an area of research.

Identifies, but does not describe an area of research.

Describes an area of research.

Describes an area of research and justifies the choice.

Describe the significance of the chosen topic.

Does not describe the significance of the chosen topic.

Identifies, but does not describe the significance of the chosen topic.

Describes the significance of the chosen topic.

Describes the significance of the chosen topic and supports statements with the literature. Explains and justifies the implications of the new knowledge for stakeholders (for example, members of the community, individuals, and professionals that serve the population.)

Summarize sources applicable to the theoretical background of the chosen topic.

Does not summarize sources applicable to the theoretical background of chosen topic.

Cites, but does not summarize sources applicable to the theoretical background of chosen topic.

Summarizes sources applicable to the theoretical background of chosen topic.

Summarizes sources applicable to the theoretical background of chosen topic. Connects common themes and discusses counter opinions. Considers theory in light of seminal works by theorists.

Summarizes sources applicable to the history of the chosen topic.

Does not summarize sources applicable to the history of the chosen topic.

Cites, but does not summarize sources applicable to the history of the chosen topic.

Summarizes sources applicable to the history of the chosen topic.

Summarizes sources applicable to the history of the chosen topic.Sheds light on the historical context and dominant themes in the evolution of the topic; connects common themes and discusses counter opinions.

Summarize sources applicable to the best practices for engaging in research.

Does not summarize sources applicable to the best practices for engaging in research.

Cites, but does not summarize sources applicable to the best practices for engaging in research.

Summarizes sources applicable to the best practices for engaging in research.

Summarizes sources applicable to the best practices for engaging in research. Connects common themes and discusses counter opinions. Describes data collection strategies, research procedures, and approaches for conducting and reporting research.

Summarize sources that add significance and relevance to the knowledge base of psychology.

Does not summarize sources that add significance and relevance to the knowledge base of psychology.

Cites, but does not summarize sources that add significance and relevance to the knowledge base of psychology.

Summarizes sources that add significance and relevance to the knowledge base of psychology.

Summarizes sources that add significance and relevance to the knowledge base of psychology. Connects common themes and applies the relevance and significance to real work examples in the field. Indicates how the chosen sources help investigators identify topics that are well understood and other topics that represent gaps in the knowledge base and the need for further study. Creates scenario that illustrates the need for new research.

5/15/2020 Draft CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW Scoring Guide

https://courseroomc.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/PSY-FP/PSY-FP5201/191000/Scoring_Guides/a02_scoring_guide.html 2/2

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Identify practices and research guidelines that address respect for individual differences and diversity.

Does not identify practices and research guidelines that address respect for individual differences and diversity.

Identifies practices and research guidelines that address respect for individual differences and diversity, but the connection to respect for individual differences and diversity is unclear.

Identifies practices and research guidelines that address respect for individual differences and diversity.

Identifies practices and research guidelines that address respect for individual differences and diversity. Addresses individual variation and diversity within and across groups.

Adhere to APA style and formatting guidelines; writing is concise and well organized.

Does not adhere to APA style and formatting guidelines; writing is concise and well organized.

Adheres to APA style and formatting guidelines inconsistently; writing is frequently not concise or well organized.

Adheres to APA style and formatting guidelines; writing is concise and well organized.

Adheres to APA style and formatting guidelines; writing is concise and well organized in a way that enhances the message and supporting points; writing reflects the quality and expertise expected for academic work.