DQERubricSecondReader1.docx
Westcliff University DQE Grading Rubric
Student Name: Antony Vellaparambil Antony
Student ID: B190580 Degree: DBA Reader #1: Pass Rewrite Fail
Semester & Year: Fall 2, 2020 Reader #2: Prof. Rapisardi Pass X Rewrite Fail
|
Rubric:
|
Distinguished = 4 points
|
Mastery = 3 points
|
Basic = 2 points
|
Minimal = 1 point
|
|
|
(Exceeds Expectations)
|
(Meets Expectations)
|
(Below Expectations)
|
(Fails to Meet Expectations)
|
|
|
Indicators of Standard
(Student’s response must meet preponderance of standard elements.) The candidate’s response provides evidence of understanding and application of the appropriate standards to promote the learning of all students in the College of Business.
|
4
Points
|
3
Points
|
2
Points
|
1
Point
|
|
1.0
|
When answering part I and II, the doctoral student facilitates the development, articulation, and implementation of business
solutions. Both parts, I and II, have been answered fully and with justification.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
The level of detail provided is sufficient enough to satisfy a comprehensive assessment to the problem or thesis statement as it relates to the answer, and is facilitated by doctoral-level research as evidenced by references and in-text citations.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
The arguments/justifications provided are cohesive and lucid, and applies directly to what each question asks.
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
4.0
|
The doctoral student identifies diversity, social, economic, and environmental opportunities when providing answers and solutions. All answers, solutions, and premises are presented with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner in accordance to Westcliff University’s bylaws.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
The doctoral student was able to demonstrate mastery of the learning objectives for each section when providing justification for
any arguments, solutions, and answers; a level of understanding and comprehension of LO’s is evident.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
A pattern of critical thinking, analysis, problem-solving, and decision-making is evident throughout the body and content of the
answers and solutions provided.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
APA/
Writing
|
Paper written in APA 6th v format (and for this exam APA 6th or 7th edition is acceptable) is coherent, free of rhetorical flaws, and uses correct grammar, spelling, and semantics.
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
21-28 points = Pass 1st Reader Signature: Total Points: Date:
|
|
18-20 points = Rewrite 2nd Reader Signature: Prof. Rapisardi Total Points: 21 Date: 11.21.2020
Below 18 points = Fail
|
|
|
|
|
Comments and Recommendations
Comments:
Your part 2 is light on detail and more of a high-level recommendation, you need to provide more specific detail as it relates to your organization. Your paper should focus more on the details of the specific needs.
Recommendations: