DPI project manuscript 6 DQ 1
Running head: DPI PROJECT MILESTONE 1
DPI PROJECT MILESTONE 5
Assessing how Advanced Practice Providers Minimize Delays in Emergency Departments
|
|
10 Strategic Points |
Comments/Feedback |
|
Broad Topic Area |
The use of advanced practice providers in triage to improve waiting times in emergency departments. |
|
|
Literature Review |
a) Background of the problem/gap; I. The waiting times in the emergency departments are mostly fueled by the large number of the patients seeking the requisite medical services. The large number of such patients causes overcrowding in the emergency department. The overcrowding is a major problem in the emergency department even in the global arena (Di Somma, Paladino, Vaughan, Lalle, Magrini, & Magnanti, 2015). II. The mismatch between the demand for the emergency services and the available resources has greatly contributed to the overcrowding within the emergency departments (Murphy, Lietz, &Jordan, 2012) III. When advanced practice practitioners are placed in the emergency department, the quality of care as well as reduced overcrowding become the order of the day (Bahena & Andreoni, 2013; Imperato et al., 2012). b) Theoretical foundations; I. Demand and capacity variation model by Eriksson (Bergbrant, and Berrum-Svennung, 2011) II. The co-management model in healthcare (Norful, Jacq, Carlino & Poghosyan, 2018) c) Review of literature topics with the key themes; I. Critical Care Medicine Advanced Practice Provider Model at a Comprehensive Cancer Center: The increasing demand for meeting the critical medical services are prompting for the increment of the number of the advanced practice providers (APPs). The role of APPs, especially in the ICUs, cannot be underestimated (Paton, Stein, Agostino, Pastores, & Halpern, 2013). II. Frequent Overcrowding in the U.S. Emergency Departments: Overcrowding in the emergency departments is a serious problem which affects not only the US but also the other countries across the world. This overcrowding cannot be limited to the county or public hospitals since it has been evident even in both the private and academic hospitals within the urban and rural areas (Derlet, Richards, & Kravitz, 2001). d) Summary; I. Gap/problem: There is a need to reduce the waiting time or delays in the emergency departments. II. Prior studies: The prior studies have proved that the involvement of advanced practice providers not only reduces the delays in the emergency departments but it also leads to provision of a quality care. III. Quantitative application: Instruments and sources of data exist to collect numerical data on the value of advanced practice providers in emergency departments. |
|
|
Problem Statement |
While the literature indicates that the involvement of advanced practice providers helps reduce the delays in the emergency departments, it is yet to be known how they help to reduce these delays. |
|
|
Clinical/PICO Questions |
How effective is the use of Advanced Practice Providers in triage in improving waiting times in Emergency departments? |
|
|
Sample |
Location: District of Columbia. Population: Three county hospitals. Sample: 30 adult patients receiving the care at the emergency department. |
|
|
Define Variables |
Dependent variable: The waiting times. Independent variable: The Advanced Practice Providers.
|
|
|
Methodology and Design |
This project will use the quantitative methodology with a descriptive research design |
|
|
Purpose Statement |
The purpose of this quantitative descriptive research study is to assess how the advanced practice providers help reduce the waiting times in the emergency departments. The advanced practice providers will be defined as the assistant physicians as well as the nurse practitioners. The waiting time will be measured by the number of hours or even days that a patient queues in the emergency department prior to getting the requisite medical services. |
|
|
Data Collection Approach |
This study will use questionnaires which will be provided to the participants to fill, but for those without literary skills, oral questions will be posed. |
|
|
Data Analysis Approach |
Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize the sample descriptive data. The data will then be presented in tables and pie charts. |
|
References
Bahena, D., & Andreoni, C. (2013). Provider in triage: Is this a place for nurse practitioners? Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, 35(4), 332-343. doi 10.1097/TME.0b013e3182aa05ba.
Derlet, R., Richards, J., & Kravitz, R. (2001). Frequent overcrowding in the US emergency departments. Academic Emergency Medicine, 8(2), 151-155. doi: 10.1111/j.1553- 2712.2001.tb01280.x
Di Somma, S., Paladino, L., Vaughan, L., Lalle, I., Magrini, L., & Magnanti, M. (2015). Overcrowding in emergency department: an international issue. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 10(2), 171-175. doi:10.1007/s11739-014-1154-8
Eriksson, H., Bergbrant, I., Berrum-Svennung, I. (2011). Reducing queues: Demand and capacity variations. International Journal of Health Care quality Assurance/MCB University Press, 24(8), 592-600.
Imperato, J., Morris, D. S., Binder, D., Fischer, C., Patrick, J., Sanchez, L. D., & Setnik, G. (2012). Physician in triage improves emergency department patient throughput. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 7(5), 457-462. doi 10.1007/s11739-012-0839-0
Love, R. A., Murphy, J. A., Lietz, T. E., & Jordan, K. S. (2012). The effectiveness of a provider in triage in the emergency department: A quality improvement initiative to improve patient flow. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, 34(1), 65-74. doi:10.1097/TME.0b013e3182435543
Norful, A., Jacq, K., Carlino, R., & Poghosyan, L. (2018). Nurse practitioner–physician comanagement: a theoretical model to alleviate primary care strain. The Annals of Family Medicine, 16(3), 250-256. doi:10.1370/afm.2230
Paton, A., Stein, D., D'Agostino, R., Pastores, S., & Halpern, N. (2013). Critical care medicine advanced practice provider model at a comprehensive cancer center: Successes and challenges. American Journal of Critical Care, 22(5), 439-443. doi:10.4037/ajcc2013821
Professor’s comments:
Please note the followings: The introduction and the literature review are complete and thorough. The problem statement is written clearly PICOT is clear and very good Sample: How will you determine the sample size? What are the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the subjects? Methodology: Why is the selected methodology is appropriate? Please justify! Data collection approach is not clear. How will you collect your data? What is needed here is to describe the process of collecting data form signing the informed consent until completing the measuring. Data analysis-What test will you use to answer your research question? Thank you for a work well done.