looking for a phd in business
exous1
dp_dm_template_20183.docx
13
Comment by Editor: Instructions for how to use this template and guide: Type directly into the template at “Begin writing here...” or “Text…”. Doing so should help to ensure that the document is properly formatted. For guidance purposes, there are reminders in the comments relating to formatting as well as helpful tips. Additionally, in each main section, there is a checklist relating to content so that you know what to include before you begin to organize your thoughts. Refer to the checklist continuously as you develop each section. As you self-evaluate each section, you can actually check off each box by clicking on it to ensure that you have met all the requirements. Please note these lists are resources and not meant to be exhaustive, as it is impossible to cover the details of every method and design. The length of a section can vary, unless a guideline is provided. Once you have developed each section, refer to the comments and checklists one last time to be sure that the section matches them as discussed with your Chair, then delete them. To delete a comment, right click on the comment, then select “Delete Comment”. For additional strategies and guidance, click here.
Dissertation Proposal and Dissertation Manuscript
Version: March 2018
© Northcentral University, 2017 Comment by Editor: Ensure that every section in the document meets the following requirements: ☐ Use 12-point and Times New Roman font. ☐ Write in the future tense when referencing the proposed study in the dissertation proposal. Write in the past tense when referencing the completed study in the dissertation manuscript. ☐ Use economy of expression to present information as succinctly as possible without oversimplifying or losing the meaning. ☐ Avoid personal opinions and claims. ☐ Support all claims in the document with recent, scholarly, peer-reviewed sources that were published within 5 years of when the dissertation will be completed, unless they are seminal sources or no other literature exists. For additional information and guidance relating to scholarly and peer-reviewed sources, click here. ☐ Avoid anthropomorphism (i.e., giving human qualities to inanimate objects) such as “The article claims…”, “The study found…”, or “The research explored…”. ☐ Clearly and precisely define key words upon their first use only.
Title of the Dissertation Comment by Editor: With the exception of articles and prepositions, the first letter of each word should be capitalized. The title should be two single spaces (one double space) from the top of the page. In 10-15 words, it should indicate the contents of the study. Do not bold the title.
Dissertation XXX Comment by Editor: Insert either “Proposal” or “Manuscript”.
Submitted to Northcentral University
School of XXX Comment by Editor: Indicate your school name here. Do not include the specialization.
in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of
DOCTOR OF XXX Comment by Editor: Insert your degree program in all capital letters (e.g., DOCTOR OF EDUCATION, DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, DOCTOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION).
by
NAME Comment by Editor: Insert your name in all capital letters (i.e., FIRST MIDDLE LAST).
San Diego, California
Month Year Comment by Editor: Insert the current month and year. There should be no comma separating them.
Abstract Comment by Editor: The abstract should be included in the dissertation manuscript only. It should not be included in the dissertation proposal. Comment by Editor: Do not bold the word “Abstract” or any heading until Chapter 1. Only the headings in Chapters 1 through 5 should be bolded.
Begin writing here… Comment by Editor: The text should be left-justified (not indented) and double-spaced with no breaks.
Checklist:
☐ Briefly introduce the study topic, state the research problem, and describe who or what is impacted by this problem.
☐ Clearly articulate the study purpose and guiding theoretical or conceptual framework of the study.
☐ Provide details about the research methodology, participants, questions, design, procedures, and analysis.
☐ Clearly present the results in relation to the research questions.
☐ State the conclusions to include both the potential implications of the results on and the recommendations for future research and practice.
☐ Do not include citations and abbreviations or acronyms, except those that are noted as exceptions by the American Psychological Association (APA).
☐ Do not exceed 350 words. Strive for one page.
Acknowledgements Comment by Editor: You may include an optional acknowledgements page in normal paragraph format in the dissertation manuscript. Do not include such a page in the dissertation proposal.
Begin writing here…
Table of Contents Comment by Editor: Use the Table of Contents feature in Word. For additional information on creating a table of contents, click here. For additional information on updating the table of contents, click here. Comment by Editor: Ensure that the headings in the table of contents match those in the document. Please note that place holders are included in this table of contents: “XXX” under Chapter 2 must be replaced with the themes that were generated from the integrative critical review of the literature. If your study is qualitative, “Operational Definitions of Variables” under Chapter 3 must be deleted. “XXX” under Chapter 4 must be replaced with “Trustworthiness” for a qualitative study, “Validity and Reliability” for a quantitative study, and “Trustworthiness/Validity and Reliability” for a mixed methods study. The number of research questions listed under Chapter 4 must align with the number of research questions in your study. Under Appendices, each “XXX” must be replaced with the titles of the appendix.
Theoretical/Conceptual Framework 3
Chapter 2: Literature Review 7
Theoretical/Conceptual Framework 7
Theme or Subtopic [Repeat as Needed] 8
Research Methodology and Design 10
Operational Definitions of Variables 12
Data Collection and Analysis 13
Research Question 1/Hypothesis [Repeat as Needed] 17
Chapter 5: Implications, Recommendations, and Conclusions 19
Recommendations for Practice 19
Recommendations for Future Research 20
Appendix B: XXX [Repeat as Needed] 24
List of Tables Comment by Editor: Use the Table of Figures feature in Word and select “Table” as the caption label. For additional information and guidance, click here.
Begin list of tables here…
List of Figures Comment by Editor: Use the Table of Figures feature in Word and select “Figure” as the caption label. For additional information and guidance, click here.
Begin list of figures here…
viii
Chapter 1: Introduction Comment by Editor: When preparing pagination, lowercase Roman numerals are used prior to the first page of Chapter 1. The Roman numerals need to be centered and placed in the footer of each page. Starting in Chapter 1, page numbers need to be placed at the upper right of each page header.
Checklist:
☐ Begin with an overview of the general topic to establish the context of the study and orient the reader to the field.
☐ Describe the larger context in which the problem exists. Explain how the problem can be addressed by the study.
☐ Present an overview of why this research topic is relevant and warranted.
☐ Briefly explain what research has been done on the topic and why the topic is important practically and empirically (applied and PhD) as well as theoretically (PhD).
☐ Clearly lead the reader to the problem statement that will follow. The reader should not be surprised by the problem that is described later in the document.
☐ Do not explicitly state the study problem, purpose, or methodology, as they are discussed in subsequent sections.
☐ Devote approximately 2 to 4 pages to this section.
Statement of the Problem Comment by Editor: Tip: Applied dissertations should be practice-based. The documented problem might be a practical problem or issue in the profession or study context for which there is not already an acceptable solution. When defining the problem, a clear distinction must be drawn between what exists currently and what is desired. An applied study does not necessarily require generalizable results beyond the study site; however, it must address a problem that is relevant and exists outside of the study site. Similarly, a PhD dissertation must focus on a problem that is relevant and exists outside of the study site. Additionally, it must make a substantive, scholarly contribution to both the research and theory. Comment by Editor: Tip: Review the limitations and calls for future research in the relevant scholarly literature for guidance in identifying a problem. Comment by Editor: Tip: There are several group sessions in the Academic Success Center per week in which students can engage with a live academic coach as well as other students who share the goal of enhancing their problem statement development skills.
Checklist:
☐ Begin with “The problem to be addressed by this study is…”. This statement should logically flow from the introduction and clearly identify the problem to be addressed by the study.
☐ Succinctly discuss the problem and provide evidence of its existence. Comment by Editor: Tip: A lack of research alone is not inherently problematic. An inability to find research on your topic might indicate a need to broaden your search. It might be helpful to review the resources in the Northcentral University Library, including the Searching 101 Workshop, or schedule a research consultation.
☐ Identify who is impacted by the problem (e.g., individuals, organizations, industries, or society), what is not known that should be known about it, and what the potential negative consequences could be if the problem is not addressed in this study.
☐ Ensure that the concepts that are presented are exactly the same as those that are mentioned in the Purpose Statement section.
☐ Do not exceed 250-300 words.
Purpose of the Study
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Begin with a succinct purpose statement that identifies the study method, design, and overarching goal: “The purpose of this [identify research methodology] [identify research design] study is to [identify the goal of the dissertation that directly reflects and encompasses the research questions that will follow].”
☐ Indicate how the study is a logical, explicit research response to the stated problem and the research questions that will follow.
☐ Continue with a brief but clear step-by-step overview of how the study will be (proposal) or was (manuscript) conducted. .
☐ Identify the variables/constructs, materials/instrumentation, and analysis.
☐ Identify the target population and sample size that will be needed (proposal) or was obtained (manuscript).
☐ Identify the site(s) where the research will be (proposal) or was (manuscript) conducted using general geographic terms to avoid identifying the specific location. To avoid compromising participants’ confidentiality or anonymity, use pseudonyms.
☐ Do not exceed one paragraph or one page.
Theoretical/Conceptual Framework
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Identify the guiding framework. Present the key concepts, briefly explain how they are related, and present the propositions that are relevant to this study.
☐ Explain how the framework guided the research decisions, including the development of the problem statement, purpose statement, and research questions.
☐ If more than one framework is guiding the study, integrate them, rather than describing them independently. Do not select a separate framework for each variable/construct under examination.
☐ Do not exceed two pages. A more thorough discussion of the theoretical/conceptual framework will be included in Chapter 2.
Nature of the Study
Begin writing here…
☐ Provide a brief discussion of the methodology and design to include a description of the data collection procedure and analysis. Do not include specific details regarding why the methodology and design were selected over others. More detailed information will be included in Chapter 3.
☐ Cite the seminal works related to the selected methodology and design. Avoid references to general textbooks such as those by Creswell and Trochim.
☐ Indicate why the selected research methodology and design are the best choices for the study by explaining how they align with the problem and purpose statements as well as the research questions. Do not simply list and describe various research methodologies and designs.
☐ Devote approximately one to two pages to this section.
Research Questions Comment by Editor: Tip: Research questions beginning with “To what extent…” or “Under what conditions…” yield more meaningful data than questions that generate yes/no responses such as “Is Variable 1 significantly related to Variable 2?”
Begin writing here... Comment by Editor: A paragraph is not required to introduce the research questions and hypotheses; a single sentence noting the research questions and hypotheses is sufficient.
RQ1. Text… Comment by Editor: Subquestions are allowed if you want to examine more in-depth research questions. For example, if the first research question has two subquestions, they would be denoted as RQ1a and RQ1b.
RQ2. Text… Comment by Editor: Repeat this process for each research question.
Hypotheses Comment by Editor: Hypotheses are only listed in quantitative and mixed methods studies. Comment by Editor: The hypotheses must align with the research questions so that RQ1 matches H1, etc.
H10. Text…
H1a. Text…
H20. Text…
H2a. Text… Comment by Editor: Repeat this process for each hypothesis.
Checklist:
☐ Present research questions that are directly answerable, specific, and testable within the given timeframe and location identified in the problem and purpose statements.
☐ Include the exact same variables/constructs, participants, and location that were mentioned in the problem and purpose statements. No new variables/constructs should be introduced.
Significance of the Study Comment by Editor: Tip: Consider the professional and academic audiences who might be interested in the study results and why.
Begin writing here…
☐ Describe why the study is important and how it can contribute to the field of study.
☐ For applied studies, explain how the results might both be significant to leaders and practitioners in the field and contribute to the literature. For PhD studies, explain how the results advance the guiding framework and contribute to the literature.
☐ Describe the benefits of addressing the study problem, achieving the study purpose, and answering the research questions. Whereas the problem statement should articulate the negative consequences of not conducting the study, this section should highlight the positive consequences of completing the study.
Definitions of Key Terms
Term 1 . Text… Comment by Editor: Replace “Term 1” with the first term and provide the definition and citation(s). Repeat this process for all the key terms.
Checklist:
☐ Alphabetize and bold terms that are directly related to the dissertation topic if they are not commonly used or understood.
☐ Paraphrase the definitions of the terms using complete sentences and provide a citation for each one.
☐ Do not define theories, conceptual frameworks, statistical analyses, methodological terms, or the variables/constructs that are under examination.
Summary
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Briefly restate the key points that were discussed in the chapter. Review the headings and/or table of contents to ensure that all the key points are covered.
Chapter 2: Literature Review Comment by Editor: Tip: Think of Chapter 2 as a funnel and lead the reader from the broad context of the study to an explanation of why this specific study is needed. Comment by Editor: Tip: There are several group sessions in the Academic Success Center per week in which students can engage with a live academic coach as well as other students who share the goal of enhancing their paraphrasing skills. Comment by Editor: Tip: To ensure that your study is relevant and current, continue to expand and update the literature review through the final dissertation manuscript draft. Comment by Editor: Tip: Conduct a thorough search of the literature based on a variety of relevant key words and databases. It is rare for there to be no existing literature on a topic that is worthy of doctoral-level study. An inability to find existing research is typically the result of too narrow of a library search. For additional information and guidance on how to conduct an effective review of the literature, it might be helpful to review the resources in the Northcentral University Library, including the Searching 101 Workshop, or schedule a research consultation. Comment by Editor: Tip: For exemplars on what synthesis and critical analysis look like, try searching the published literature using the following terms “critical review of the literature [school]”, inserting the name of your school.
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Begin with a summary of the purpose statement that leads to a brief explanation of the organization of the literature review. Do not simply cut and paste the Purpose Statement section from Chapter 1.
☐ Include several subheadings that are specific to this dissertation.
☐ To ensure that the study is relevant, current, and warranted, approximately 85% of references must be to peer-reviewed research that was published within the last 5 years of when the dissertation will be completed.
☐ At the end of this section, list the databases that were accessed and the search engines that were used. List all the search parameters, including the search terms and their combinations (with more detailed search terms located in an appendix, if appropriate), range of years, and types of literature.
☐ Devote approximately 40 to 80 pages to this section to include citations to at least 50 relevant sources.
Theoretical/Conceptual Framework
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Describe the guiding theoretical/conceptual framework of the study, including the definitions of all the concepts, an explanation of the relationships among the concepts, and a presentation of all the assumptions and propositions.
☐ Explain the origin and development of the framework. Demonstrate detailed knowledge of and familiarity with both the historical and the current literature on the framework.
☐ Identify existing research studies that used this framework in a similar way. Mention alternative frameworks, with a justification of why the selected framework was chosen.
☐ Describe how and why the selected framework relates to the present study and how it guided the development of the problem statement, purpose statement, and research questions.
Theme or Subtopic Comment by Editor: Replace “Theme or Subtopic” with a theme from the integrative critical review of the literature. Repeat this process until each theme is included.
Begin writing here…
Level 3 heading. Text... Comment by Editor: The level 3 heading is indented and bolded but is not italicized. The text begins directly after the heading in normal paragraph format. Comment by Editor: If additional subheadings are needed, use this format per APA guidelines.
Level 4 heading. Text... Comment by Editor: The level 4 heading is indented, bolded, and italicized. Only the first word is capitalized. The text begins directly after the heading in normal paragraph format.
Checklist:
☐ Critically analyze (i.e., note the strengths and weaknesses) and synthesize (i.e., integrate) the existing research. Rather than reporting on each study independently, describe everything that is known on the topic by reviewing the entire body of work.
☐ Present a balanced integrative critical review of the literature, ensuring that all points of view are included. Cover all the important issues with a discussion of areas of convergence (i.e., agreement) and divergence (i.e., disagreement). Provide potential explanations for areas of divergence.
Summary Comment by Editor: Tip: In essence, the summary is the “take-home” message of the integrative critical review of the literature with a specific emphasis on how the literature supports the need for your study.
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Briefly restate the key points that were discussed in the chapter. Review the headings and/or table of contents to ensure that all the key points are covered.
☐ Highlight areas of convergence and divergence as well as gaps in the literature that support the need for the study. This discussion should logically lead to Chapter 3, where the research methodology and design will be discussed.
Chapter 3: Research Method
Checklist:
☐ Begin with an introduction and restatement of the problem and purpose statements verbatim. Comment by Editor: You can copy and paste from your Chapter 1.
☐ Provide a brief overview of the contents of this chapter, including a statement that identifies the research methodology and design.
Research Methodology and Design
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Describe the research methodology and design. Elaborate upon their appropriateness in relation to the study problem, purpose, and research questions.
☐ Identify alternative methodologies and designs and indicate why they were determined to be less appropriate than the ones that were selected. Do not simply list and describe research methodologies and designs in general.
Population and Sample Comment by Editor: Tip: Depending on the study design, the population might include but not be limited to a group of people, a set of organizations, documents, or archived data.
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Describe the population, including the estimated size and relevant characteristics.
☐ Explain why the population is appropriate, given the study problem, purpose, and research questions.
☐ Describe the sample that will be (proposal) or was (manuscript) obtained.
☐ Explain why the sample is appropriate, given the study problem, purpose, and research questions.
☐ Explain how the sampling guidelines that are associated with the chosen methodology and design will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) followed. For qualitative studies, evidence must be presented that saturation will be (proposal) or was (manuscript) reached. For quantitative studies, a power analysis must be reported to include the parameters (e.g., effect size, alpha, beta, number of groups) that were included, and evidence must be presented that the minimum required sample size will be (proposal) or was (manuscript) reached.
☐ Describe how the participants will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) recruited (e.g., email lists from professional organizations, flyers) and/or the data will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) obtained (e.g., archived data, public records) with sufficient detail that the study could be replicated. Comment by Editor: Tip: Many qualitative and mixed methods studies require multiple sources of data. Describe how the data will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) obtained from each source.
Materials/Instrumentation Comment by Editor: Tip: In quantitative studies, the development of a new instrument is discouraged due to the time and skills that are required to create a valid and reliable instrument. A thorough and extensive search of the literature should be done to locate an appropriate psychometrically sound instrument. However, if such an instrument is not located after a thorough search, and you plan to develop a new instrument, consult survey item and instrument development resources and plan piloting and validation procedures. Describe the development process in detail and provide evidence of the instrument’s validity and reliability. Include the final instrument that was developed based on those findings. The evidence of validity and reliability should be reported in Chapter 4. In qualitative studies, using a newly developed interview protocol based on the literature is more common and acceptable. Describe the development process in detail followed by the field testing processes used and subsequent modification that were made.
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Describe the instruments (e.g., tests, questionnaires, observation protocols) that will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) used, including information on their origin and evidence of their reliability and validity.
☐ Describe in detail any field testing or pilot testing of instruments to include their results and any subsequent modifications. Comment by Editor: Verify with the IRB whether permission is needed or a pilot application needs to be completed.
☐ Include evidence that permission was granted to use the instrument(s) in an appendix.
Operational Definitions of Variables Comment by Editor: Include this section in quantitative/mixed methods studies only. Comment by Editor: Operational definitions are distinct from the conceptual definitions that are provided in the Definition of Terms section. Specifically, operational definitions indicate how the variables will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) measured.
Begin writing here... Comment by Editor: A paragraph is not required to introduce the operational definitions; a single sentence introducing this section is sufficient.
XXX. Text… Comment by Editor: Replace “XXX” with the first study variable. Repeat this process for all the study variables.
Checklist:
☐ For quantitative and mixed methods studies, identify how each variable will be (proposal) or was (manuscript) used in the study. Use terminology that is appropriate for the selected statistical test (e.g., independent/dependent, predictor/criterion, mediator, moderator).
☐ Base the operational definitions on published research and valid and reliable instruments.
☐ Identify the specific instrument that will be (proposal) or was (manuscript) used to measure each variable.
☐ Describe the level of measurement of each variable (e.g., nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio), potential scores for each variable (e.g., the range [0–100] or levels [low, medium, high]), and data sources. If appropriate, identify what specific scores (e.g., subscale scores, total scores) will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) included in the analysis and how they will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) derived (e.g., calculating the sum, difference, average).
Study Procedures
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Describe the exact steps that will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) followed to collect the data, addressing what data as well as how, when, from where, and from whom those data will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) collected in enough detail that the study can be replicated.
Data Collection and Analysis
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Describe the strategies that will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) used to code and/or analyze the data, and any software that will be (proposal) or was (manuscript) used.
☐ Ensure that the data that will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) collected and the analysis can be used to answer the research questions and/or test the hypotheses with the ultimate goal of addressing the identified problem.
☐ Use proper terminology in association with each design/analysis (e.g., independent variable and dependent variable for an experimental design, predictor and criterion variables for regression).
☐ For quantitative studies, describe the analysis that will be (proposal) or was (manuscript) used to test each hypothesis. Provide evidence that the statistical test that was chosen is appropriate to test the hypotheses and that the data meet the assumptions of the statistical tests.
☐ For qualitative studies, describe how the data will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) processed and analyzed, including any triangulation efforts. Explain the role of the researcher.
☐ For mixed methods studies, include all of the above.
Assumptions Comment by Editor: Tip: Assumptions, limitations, and delimitations are related but distinct concepts. For additional information, click here.
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Discuss the assumptions along with the corresponding rationale underlying them.
Limitations Comment by Editor: Tip: The study limitations will be revisited in Chapter 5.
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Describe the study limitations.
☐ Discuss the measures that were taken to mitigate these limitations.
Delimitations Comment by Editor: Tip: Limited time and resources are not considered to be limitations or delimitations, as all studies are limited by these factors.
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Describe the study delimitations along with the corresponding rationale underlying them.
☐ Explain how these research decisions relate to the existing literature and theoretical/conceptual framework, problem statement, purpose statement, and research questions.
Ethical Assurances Comment by Editor: Tip: When research involves human subjects, certain ethical issues can occur. They include but are not limited to protection from harm, informed consent, right to privacy, and honesty with professional colleagues.
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Confirm in a statement that the study will (proposal) or did (manuscript) receive approval from Northcentral University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) prior to data collection.
☐ If the risk to participants is greater than minimal, discuss the relevant ethical issues and how they will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) addressed. Comment by Editor: Tip: For guidance on ethical considerations in human subjects research, click here.
☐ Describe how confidentiality or anonymity will be (proposal) or was (manuscript) achieved.
☐ Identify how the data will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) securely stored in accordance with IRB requirements.
☐ Describe the role of the researcher in the study. Discuss relevant issues, including biases as well as personal and professional experiences with the topic, problem, or context. Present the strategies that will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) used to prevent these biases and experiences from influencing the analysis or findings.
☐ In the dissertation manuscript only, include the IRB approval letter in an appendix.
Summary
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Summarize the key points that were presented in the chapter.
☐ Logically lead the reader to the next chapter on the findings of the study.
Chapter 4: Findings
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Begin with a brief overview of the purpose of the study and the organization of the chapter.
☐ Organize the entire chapter around the research questions/hypotheses. Comment by Editor: Tip: Review peer-reviewed research articles to locate examples of how to report results that were generated using the research design that you used in your study.
XXX of the Data Comment by Editor: Replace “XXX” with “Trustworthiness” for a qualitative study or “Validity and Reliability” for a quantitative study. For mixed methods studies, replace it with “Trustworthiness/Validity and Reliability”.
Checklist:
☐ For qualitative studies, clearly identify the means by which the trustworthiness of the data was established. Discuss credibility (e.g., triangulation, member checks), transferability (e.g., the extent to which the findings are generalizable to other situations), dependability (e.g., an in-depth description of the methodology and design to allow the study to be repeated), and confirmability (e.g., the steps to ensure that the data and findings are not due to participant and/or researcher bias).
☐ For quantitative studies, explain the extent to which the data meet the assumptions of the statistical test and identify any potential factors that might impact the interpretation of the findings. Provide evidence of the psychometric soundness (i.e., adequate validity and reliability) of the instruments from the literature as well as in this study (as appropriate). Do not merely list and describe all the measures of validity and reliability.
☐ Mixed methods studies should include discussions of the trustworthiness of the data as well as validity and reliability.
Results Comment by Editor: Tip: Present sufficient information so that the reader can make an independent judgment regarding the interpretation of the findings.
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Briefly discuss the overall study. Organize the presentation of the results by the research questions/hypotheses.
☐ Objectively report the results of the analysis without discussion, interpretation, or speculation.
☐ Provide an overview of the demographic information that was collected. It can be presented in a table. Ensure that no potentially identifying information is reported.
Research question 1/hypothesis. Text… Comment by Editor: Repeat this process for each research question.
☐ Report all the results (without discussion) that are salient to the research question/hypothesis. Identify common themes or patterns.
☐Use tables and/or figures to report the results as appropriate. Comment by Editor: Tip: Tables and figures should not be included on the same page. If you introduce a table or figure in the middle of the page and there is not enough room to include the entire table or figure on the page, it must be placed on the next page. To do that, perform a hard right return (hold down the shift key while hitting the return key) and begin the table on the next page. Comment by Editor: Tip: Tables and figures must be referenced in the text. Please refer to APA guidelines regarding when and how to use tables and figures. Do not fully describe data in the text and also present them in a table. Comment by Editor: Tip: Tables and figures should be placed with the corresponding research question. The formatting of tables varies, depending on the statistical test. Follow APA formatting requirements for tables, titles, figures, and captions.
☐ For quantitative studies, report any additional descriptive information as appropriate. Identify the assumptions of the statistical test and explain how the extent to which the data met these assumptions was tested. Report any violations and describe how they were managed as appropriate. Make decisions based on the results of the statistical analysis. Include relevant test statistics, p values, and effect sizes in accordance with APA requirements.
☐ For qualitative studies, describe the steps that were taken to analyze the data to explain how the themes and categories were generated. Include thick descriptions of the participants’ experiences. Provide a comprehensive and coherent reconstruction of the information that was obtained from all the participants. Comment by Editor: Tip: Review published articles that used the same design for examples of how to present qualitative, thematic findings.
☐ For mixed methods studies, include all of the above.
Evaluation of the Findings
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Interpret the results in light of the existing research and theoretical or conceptual framework (as discussed in Chapters 1 and 2). Briefly indicate the extent to which the results were consistent with existing research and theory.
☐ Organize this discussion by research question/hypothesis.
☐ Do not draw conclusions beyond what can be interpreted directly from the results.
☐ Devote approximately one to two pages to this section.
Summary
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Summarize the key points that were presented in the chapter.
Chapter 5: Implications, Recommendations, and Conclusions Comment by Editor: Tip: A common tendency is to rush through Chapter 5 and fail to develop ideas fully. Take time to remember why the study was important in the first place and ensure that Chapter 5 demonstrates and reflects the depth and importance of the study. Refer back to the study problem and significance and consider what professional and academic organizations might be interested in your research findings. As you complete Chapter 5, seek out avenues to present and publish your research.
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Begin with a brief review of the problem statement, purpose statement, methodology, design, results, and limitations.
☐ Conclude with a brief overview of the chapter.
Implications
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Organize the discussion around each research question and (when appropriate) hypothesis individually. Support all the conclusions with one or more findings from the study.
☐ Discuss any factors that might have influenced the interpretation of the results.
☐ Present the results in the context of the study by describing the extent to which they address the study problem and purpose and contribute to the existing literature and framework described in Chapter 2.
☐ Describe the extent to which the results are consistent with existing research and theory and provide potential explanations for unexpected or divergent results.
Recommendations for Practice
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Discuss recommendations for how the findings of the study can be applied to practice and/or theory. Support all the recommendations with at least one finding from the study and frame them in the literature from Chapter 2.
☐ Do not overstate the applicability of the findings.
Recommendations for Future Research
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Based on the framework, findings, and implications, explain what future researchers might do to learn from and build upon this study. Justify these explanations.
☐ Discuss how future researchers can improve upon this study, given its limitations.
☐ Explain what the next logical step is in this line of research.
Conclusions
Begin writing here…
Checklist:
☐ Provide a strong, concise conclusion to include a summary of the study, the problem that it addressed, and the importance of the study.
☐ Present the “take-home message” of the entire study.
☐ Emphasize what the results of the study mean with respect to previous research and either theory (PhD studies) or practice (applied studies).
References Comment by Editor: Tip: Create your reference list as you develop each section. As each citation is included in the paper, insert the reference in this section. If using a citation software, ensure all information is included and properly formatted. Although such programs can be helpful, they are not always correct. Comment by Editor: For each reference that is listed, there must be at least one corresponding citation within the body of the text and vice versa. The references should be alphabetized by the last name of the first author.
Reference 1 Comment by Editor: Please note the references should follow APA formatting, EXCEPT for spacing. NCU format requires single-space of individual references and a double-space between each reference.
Reference 2
Reference n
Appendices Comment by Editor: Each appendix that is referenced in the text should appear in this section at the end of the manuscript. Appendices should be listed in the order in which they are referenced in the text. Remember to include each appendix in your Table of Contents
Appendix A: XXX
Insert/type Appendix A content here… Comment by Editor: Be sure to de-identify all materials so that readers cannot identify participants or where the data were specifically collected.
Appendix B: XXX
Insert/type Appendix n content here…
