invictus assignment

• Review the assignment rubric.

• Reference your sources Links to an external site..

• Submit your assignment below.

Rubric Essay/Paper Rubric 100 Points

Essay/Paper Rubric 100 Points

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

40 pts Excel lent The essay illustr ates exem plary unde rstan ding of the cours e mate rial by thoro ughly and corre ctly: (1) addr essin g the relev ant conte nt; (2) ident ifying and expla ining all of the key conc epts/ ideas ; (3) using corre

35 pts Good exem plary unde rstan ding of the cours e mate rial by thoro ughly and corre ctly: (1) addr essin g the relev ant conte nt; (2) ident ifying and expla ining all of the key conc epts/ ideas ; (3) using corre ct termi nolog y; (4) expla

30 pts Acce ptabl e The essay illustr ates rudi ment ary unde rstan ding of the cours e mate rial by: (1) ment ionin g, but not fully expla ining, the relev ant conte nt; (2) ident ifying some of the key conc epts/ ideas (thou gh

20 pts Unac cepta ble The essay illustr ates poor unde rstan ding of the cours e mate rial by (1) failin g to addr ess or incor rectly addr essin g the relev ant conte nt; (2) failin g to ident ify or inacc urate ly expla ining /defi ning key conc

40 pts

ct termi nolog y; (4) expla ining the reaso ning behin d key point s/clai ms; and (5) (whe re nece ssary or usefu l) subst antia ting point s with sever al accur ate and origi nal exam ples. (40 point s)

ining the reaso ning behin d key point s/clai ms; and (5) (whe re nece ssary or usefu l) subst antia ting point s with sever al accur ate and origi nal exam ples. (40 point s) The essay illustr ates solid unde rstan ding of the cours e

failin g to fully or accur ately expla in many of them ); (3) using termi nolog y, thou gh some times inacc urate ly or inapp ropri ately; and (4) incor porat ing some key claim s/poi nts, but failin g to expla in the reaso ning behin d them (or

epts/ ideas ; (3) ignor ing or incor rectly expla ining key point s/clai ms and the reaso ning behin d them ; and (4) incor rectly or inapp ropri ately using termi nolog y. (20 point s)

mate rial by corre ctly: (1) addr essin g most of the relev ant conte nt; (2) ident ifying and expla ining most of the key conc epts/ ideas ; (3) using corre ct termi nolog y; (4) expla ining the reaso ning behin d most of the key point

doing so inacc urate ly). (30 point s)

s/clai ms; and (5) (whe re nece ssary or usefu l) subst antia ting some point s with accur ate exam ples. (35 point s)

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasoning

40 pts Excel lent The essay reflec ts exper t reaso ning by: (1) synth esizin g mate rial; (2) maki ng conn ectio ns betw een relev ant ideas /clai ms/p oints; (3) prese nting an insig htful and thoro ugh evalu ation of the relev ant

35 pts Good The essay reflec ts fairly stron g reaso ning by: (1) synth esizin g mate rial, (2) maki ng appr opria te conn ectio ns betw een some of the key ideas /clai ms/p oints; (3) accur ately evalu ating the issue /prob lem; and

30 pts Acce ptabl e The essay reflec ts basic reaso ning by: (1) synth esizin g some of the mate rial, thou gh rema ins vagu e and unde velop ed; (2) maki ng a few conn ectio ns betw een ideas /clai ms/p oints, but ignor ing or

20 pts Unac cepta ble The essay reflec ts subst anda rd or poor reaso ning by: (1) failin g to synth esize the mate rial or doing so inacc urate ly; (2) failin g to make conn ectio ns betw een ideas /clai ms/p oints or doing so inacc urate ly;

40 pts

issue or probl em; (4) ident ifying and discu ssing impo rtant nuan ces in the relev ant mate rial; and (5) ident ifying and discu ssing key assu mpti ons and/ or impli catio ns. (40 point s)

(4) ident ifying ad discu ssing key assu mpti ons and/ or impli catio ns. (35 point s)

inacc urate ly conn ectin g other s; (3) evalu ating the issue /prob lem at a very basic /supe rficial level; and (4) ignor ing assu mpti ons and impli catio ns. (30 point s)

and (3) failin g to evalu ate the issue or probl em. (20 point s)

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Grammar and Mechanics

20 pts Excel lent The essay is clear, and conci se as a result of: (1) appr opria te and preci se use of termi nolog y; (2) abse nce of tange nts and coher ence of thou ghts; and (3) logic al orga nizati on of ideas and thou ghts.

15 pts Good The essay is mostl y clear as a result of: (1) appr opria te use of termi nolog y and mini mal vagu eness ; (2) mini mal num ber of tange nts and lack of repet ition; and (3) fairly good orga nizati on (4) comp lete

10 pts Acce ptabl e The essay is often uncle ar and diffic ult to follo w due to: (1) some inapp ropri ate termi nolog y and/ or vagu e langu age; (2) ideas some times being frag ment ed, wond ering and/ or repet itive; and (3)

5 pts Unac cepta ble The essay does not com muni cate ideas /poin ts clearl y due to: (1) inapp ropri ate use of termi nolog y and vagu e langu age; (2) relian ce on disjoi nted and inco mpre hensi ble thou ghts and claus es; and (3) lack

20 pts

(4) comp lete sente nces, free of spelli ng error s and uses corre ct gram mar, (5) follo ws corre ct form attin g style, (6) falls betw een the mini mum and maxi mum page requi reme nt. (20 point s

sente nces, few spelli ng error s and gram mar mista kes, (5) follo ws corre ct form attin g style with mini mal mista kes, (6) falls betw een the mini mum and maxi mum page requi reme nt. (15 point s)

poor orga nizati on. (4) inco mple te sente nces, has spelli ng error s and uses acce ptabl e gram mar, (5) barel y follo ws corre ct form attin g style, (6) does not fall betw een the mini mum and maxi mum page requi reme nt.

of recog nizab le orga nizati on. (4) no sente nce struc ture, many spelli ng error s and unac cepta ble gram mar, (5) does not follo w corre ct form attin g style, (6) does not fall betw een the mini mum and maxi mum page requi

(10 point s)

reme nt. (5 point s)

Total Points: 100