Draft Prospectus Iteration
iabepdadm
DNP-830-Module6IP-DRAFTPROSPECTUS.docIMPACTS OF MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION ERROR 1
IMPACTS OF ADMINISTRATIVE ERRORS 5
Impacts of Medication Administration Error on Three to Four years-old Leukemia Patients
Submitted by:
Prospectus
Doctor of Nursing Practice
Grand Canyon University
Phoenix, Arizona
February 12, 2020
The Prospectus Overview and Instructions
|
Prospectus Instructions: 1. Read the entire Prospectus Template to understand the requirements for writing your prospectus. Each section contains a narrative overview of what should be included in the section and a table with the required criteria for each section. WRITE TO THE CRITERIA, as they will be used to assess the prospectus for the overall quality and feasibility of your proposed research study. 2. As you draft each section, delete the narrative instructions and insert your work related to that section. Use the criterion table for each section to ensure that you address the requirements for that particular section. Do not delete/remove the criterion table as this is used by you and your committee to evaluate your prospectus. 3. Prior to submitting your prospectus for review by your chair or methodologist, use the criteria table for each section to complete a realistic self-evaluation, inserting what you believe is your score for each listed criterion into the Learner Self-Evaluation column. This is an exercise in self-evaluation and critical reflection, and to ensure that you completed all sections, addressing all required criteria for that section. 4. The scoring for the criteria ranges from a 0-3, as defined below. Complete a realistic and thoughtful evaluation of your work. Your chair and methodologist will also use the criterion tables to evaluate your work. 5. Your Prospectus should be no longer than 6-10 pages when the tables are deleted.
|
|
|
Score |
Assessment |
|
0 |
Item Not Present |
|
1 |
Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required: Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. All items scored at one must be addressed by learner peer reviewer comments. |
|
2 |
Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May Be Required Now or in the Future. The component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leaves the reader with questions. Any item scored at two must be addressed by the learner per the reviewer's comments. |
|
3 |
Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions Required. The component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leaves the reader with questions. No changes required. |
Contents
12 Advancing Scientific Knowledge and Significance of the Study
15 Nature of the Research Design for the Study
18 NOTE: This section elaborates on the Data Collection from the 10 Strategic Points.
26 Theoretical Foundations/Conceptual Framework and Review of the Literature/Themes
27 Summary
Introduction
Health care firms have invested in nurses as front line staff that should recognize and report any errors pertaining to medication, although the nurse is the source of the error, a contributor of has observed the error take place (Jones, at el 2016). They depend on the nurse's ability to detect the problem and make decisions to put forward the medication errors that have been discovered. Chemotherapy is one of the dangers that young Leukemia patients suffer when they are overexposed to the radioactive rays. The administration of chemotherapy is the main part of the clinical principals of oncology nursing. When the medication is not well prescribed to the patients, who are involved in the physical treatment rather the care that they are being given by nurses.
Through statistical numbers, it shows about in-patients who are suffering from the treatment suffer adverse impacts from the administrative decisions that should be well structured by the treating nurses. Human errors that happen among health care workers are at the rising trend mainly because of forgetfulness, inattention, poor motivation, carelessness, negligence, and recklessness. These factors are due to human actions that can be avoided by taking measures that will help resolve the problem. Some of the errors are unrealistic since they seem to be petty and minor to be committed with such high profile people who have taken their studies of making things right in the treatment of patients.
The efforts of reducing errors in health care sectors are mainly directed towards the prevention of such occurrences than at the management section when a mistake occurs. The management should drive a mechanism of making sure they have a well-laid protocol on how they should handle when they happen since young patients are delicate of suffering a lot in making changes in their health. Many institutions prescribe when errors happen for Leukemia patients to be reported through the institutional reporting system in such incidence.
Due to due to limited clinical experience, nursing students have high chances of making mistakes in handling patients, offering poor medication treatments. Students have been reported of a lack of knowledge about patients' diagnosis, the purpose, and correct method of administration of medication that patients are supposed to be prescribed, especially to young patients who require a lot of care while dealing with them. The administration has the knowledge of nursing students having weakness in handling patients in Leukemia since they are sensitive to the type of prescription they are supposed to be subjected to.
When a mistake has happened during the treatment of Leukemia young patients, the administration should admit and report the mistake in a good time to save the lives of the Leukemia patients. There should be a proper monitoring system that should be drawn in a cross range so that patients can have an appropriate manner that they will have to settle their factors on records and to have treatment of patients. Records do not actually portray the exact situation with regard to the occurrence of medications and errors that should be handled inappropriate manner. The administration should take a close range of all activities that take place with the institution so that they can handle all errors that may happen during service delivery to patients.
|
Criteria |
Learner Self-Evaluation Score (0-3) |
Chair Evaluation Score (0-3) |
Reviewer Score (0-3) |
|
Introduction This section briefly overviews the research focus or problem, why this study is worth conducting, and how this study will be completed. The recommended length for this section is two to three paragraphs. |
|||
|
1. A dissertation topic is introduced along with why the study is needed. |
|
|
|
|
2. It provides a summary of results from prior empirical research on the topic. |
|
|
|
|
3. Using results, societal needs, recommendations for further study, or needs identified in three to five research studies (primarily from the last three years), the learner identifies the stated need, called a gap. |
|
|
|
|
4. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
|
NOTE: This Introduction section elaborates on the Topic from the 10 Strategic Points . This Introduction section provides the foundation for the Introduction section in Chapter 1 of the Proposal. |
|||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Background of the Problem
The aim of the project is to examine crossly on impacts on administrative errors that are made on young patients who are suffering from Leukemia aged between three to four years. The main consequences of medication administration errors affect a patient’s morbidity and mortality. These errors affect families of the patients, patients, and health institutions indirectly through cost implications that would have been handled without having committed the mistakes. Patients lose their lives when they are given a wrong dose that should have been protected in the early stages. The errors also bring about psychological torture that will stretch to patients who are in the same institution about the fate of their medication on the same facility.
|
Criteria |
Learner Self-Evaluation Score (0-3) |
Chair or Score (0-3) |
Reviewer Score (0-3) |
|
Background of the Problem This section uses the literature to provide the reader with a definition and statement of the research gap and problem the study will address. This section further presents a brief historical perspective of when the problem started and how it has evolved over time. The recommended length for this section is two-three paragraphs. |
|||
|
1. Includes a brief discussion demonstrating how literature has established the gap and a clear statement informing the reader of the gap. |
1 |
|
|
|
2. Discusses how the “need” or “defined gap” has evolved historically into the current problem or opportunity to be addressed by the proposed study (citing seminal and/or current research). |
1 |
|
|
|
3. ALIGNMENT: The problem statement for the dissertation will be developed from and justified by the “need” or “defined gap” that is described in this section and supported by the empirical research literature published within the past 3-5 years. |
2 |
|
|
|
4. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
2 |
|
|
|
NOTE: This Background of the Problem section uses information from the Literature Review in the 10 Strategic Points. This Background of the Problem section becomes the Background of the Study in Note; this section develops the foundation for Chapter 1 in the Proposal. It is then expanded to develop the comprehensive Background to the Problem section and Identification of the GAP sections in Chapter 2 (Literature Review) in the Proposal. |
|||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Problem Statement
Cases of Young children aged between three and four years have been reported several on poor medications that are offered by health institutions. This project will deeply look into suggestions on how to solve the administrative errors that have become rampant in the health section. The institutions have taken treatment of patients as a normal manner on any disease without considering the age and the kind of disease the patient is suffering from. Therefore, this project will look at ways patients age three to four suffering from Leukemia have been impacted by administrative errors.
|
Criteria
|
Learner Self-Evaluation Score (0-3) |
Chair or Score (0-3) |
Reviewer Score (0-3) |
|
Problem Statement This section includes the problem statement, the population affected, and how the study will contribute to solving the problem. The recommended length for this section is one paragraph. |
|||
|
1. States the specific problem proposed for research with a clear declarative statement. |
1 |
|
|
|
2. Describes the population of interest affected by the problem. The general population refers to all individuals that could be affected by the study problem. |
1 |
|
|
|
3. Describes the unit of analysis. For qualitative studies, this describes how the phenomenon will be studied. This can be individuals, groups, or organizations under study. For quantitative studies, the unit of analysis needs to be defined in terms of the variable structure (conceptual, operational, and measurement). |
1 |
|
|
|
4. Discusses the importance, scope, or opportunity for the problem and the importance of addressing the problem. |
1 |
|
|
|
5. The problem statement is developed based on the need or gap defined in the Background to the Study section. |
2 |
|
|
|
6. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
1 |
|
|
|
NOTE: This section elaborates on the Problem Statement from the 10 Strategic Points. This section becomes the foundation for the Problem Statement section in Chapter 1 and other Chapters where appropriate in the Proposal. |
|||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Purpose of the Study
The significant purpose of this study is the impacts that are drawn from the way administrative errors have caused a lot of harm to patients especially young patients. The qualitative description will ensure it has covered all aspects that are affecting patients, especially of medication errors that are done on leukemia patients at their young age.
|
Criteria
|
Learner Self-Evaluation Score (0-3) |
Chair or Score (0-3) |
Reviewer Score (0-3) |
|
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY This section reflects what the study is about, connecting the problem statement, methodology & research design, target population, variables/phenomena, and geographic location. The recommended length for this section is one paragraph. |
|||
|
7. It begins with one sentence that identifies the research methodology and design, target population, variables (quantitative) or phenomena (qualitative) to be studied, and geographic location. |
1 |
|
|
|
8. Quantitative Studies : Defines the variables and relationships of variables. 9. Qualitative Studies: Describes the nature of the phenomena to be explored. |
1 |
|
|
|
10. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
1 |
|
|
|
NOTE: This section elaborates on the information in the Purpose Statement from the 10 Strategic Points. This section becomes the foundation for the Purpose of the Study section in Chapter 1 and other Chapters where appropriate in the Proposal. |
|||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Research Questions
The study is going to be a qualitative descriptive that will be focusing on the effects of administrative errors on patients aged between three and four years (Mohammadabad at el 2015). It has created a lot of concern about how patients should handle their conditions even if they are not presented in the health facility. The research will also focus on how other parties, such as relatives and the family of the patient, get impacted.
Research questions
The following research questions will help to guide this qualitative study:
· RQ1: How does the administration handle situations on errors over Leukemia young leukemia patients?
· RQ2: How soon should the errors be handled by the health facility? Who should be accountable for the costs of errors?
|
Criteria |
Learner Self-Evaluation Score (0-3) |
Chair Score (0-3) |
Reviewer Score (0-3) |
|
Research Question(s) and/or Hypotheses · The recommendation is a minimum of two research questions, along with related hypotheses and variables is required for a quantitative study. · Also recommended is a minimum of two research questions, along with the phenomenon description is required for a qualitative study. · Put the Research Questions in the appropriate Table in Appendix B based on whether the study is qualitative or quantitative. The recommended length for this section is a list of research questions and associated hypotheses (quantitative) |
|||
|
11. Qualitative Studies: States the research question(s) the study will answer and describes the phenomenon to be studied. 12. Quantitative Studies : States the research questions the study will answer, identifies and describes the variables, and states the hypotheses (predictive statements) using the format appropriate for the specific design and statistical analysis. |
2 |
|
|
|
13. Alignment: The research questions are based on both the Problem Statement and Theoretical Foundation model(s) or theory(s). There should be no research questions that are not clearly aligned to the Problem Statement. |
2 |
|
|
|
14. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
2 |
|
|
|
NOTE: This section elaborates on the information about Research Questions) & Hypothesis/variables or Phenomena from the 10 Strategic Points. This section becomes the foundation for the Research Question(s) and/or Hypotheses section in Chapter 1 in the Proposal. |
|||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Advancing Scientific Knowledge and Significance of the Study
The study will look also look at other aspects that are affecting health facilities such as lack of types of equipment and proper technology that should be put in place. The study relates to other fiends of technology, social welfare, and an education system that should be taken in an advancing manner of having a composed aspect of having critical affairs of making patients meet their needs.
|
Criteria |
Learner Self-Evaluation Score (0-3) |
Chair Score (0-3) |
Reviewer Score (0-3) |
|
ADVANCING SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE and SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY This section reiterates the gap or need in the literature and states how the study will address the gap or need and how the research will contribute to the literature, practical implications to the community of interest, and alignment with the program of study. The recommended length for this section is one to two paragraphs, providing a brief synopsis of each criterion listed below, which will be expanded in the proposal. |
|||
|
15. Clearly identifies the “gap” or “need” in the literature that was used to define the problem statement and develop the research questions. (citations required) |
2 |
|
|
|
16. Describes how the study will address the “gap” or “identified need” defined in the literature and contribute to /advance the body of literature. (citations required) |
2 |
|
|
|
17. Describes the potential practical applications from the research. (citations required) |
2 |
|
|
|
18. Identifies and connects the theory(ies) or model(s) that provide the theoretical foundations or conceptual frameworks for the study. (citations required) |
2 |
|
|
|
19. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
2 |
|
|
|
NOTE: This section builds on information about the Literature review and Theoretical Foundations sections in the 10 Strategic Points. This section becomes the foundation for the Theoretical Foundations section in Chapter 2 |
|
||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
|
Rationale for Methodology
The methodology that will be used to respond to the research questions plus that will also address the problem statement is a qualitative methodology. The qualitative approach is very significant when a scenario that is being queried properly and effectively defined, and this study has distinctly put clear the impacts that patients have been suffering from, but they have no clear way of addressing them (Ravandi, at el 2015).
|
Criteria |
Learner Self-Evaluation Score (0-3) |
Chair or Score (0-3) |
Reviewer Score (0-3) |
|
Rationale for Methodology The Rationale for the Methodology section clearly justifies the methodology the researcher plans to use for conducting the study. It argues how the methodological choice (quantitative or qualitative) is the best approach to answer the research questions and address the problem statement. Finally, it contains citations from textbooks and articles on research methodology and/or articles on related studies to provide evidence to support the argument for the selected methodology. The recommended length for this section is one paragraph.
|
|||
|
20. Identifies the specific research methodology for the study. |
2 |
|
|
|
21. It justifies the methodology to be used for the study by discussing why it is an appropriate approach for answering the research question(s) and addressing the problem statement. 22. Quantitative Studies: Justify in terms of the problem statement and the variables for which data will be collected. 23. Qualitative Studies: Justify in terms of problem statement and phenomenon. |
2 |
|
|
|
24. Uses citations from seminal (authoritative) sources (textbooks and/or empirical research literature) to justify the selected methodology. Note: Introductory or survey research textbooks (such as Creswell) are not considered seminal sources. |
2 |
|
|
|
25. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
2 |
|
|
|
NOTE: This section elaborates on the Methodology and Design in the 10 Strategic Points. This section becomes the foundation for the Research Methodology in Chapter 1 of the Proposal and the basis for developing Chapter 3, Research Methodology. |
|||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Nature of the Research Design for the Study
This research will cover some health facilities that are offering services on Leukemia, specifically on young children and having administrative errors that have been rampant to handle. Qualitative-descriptive research is descriptive in nature and helps in describing a natural phenomenon. This method will help provide a clear finding of factors that have been making the condition disastrous. Despite having control measures that will help patients get relieved. The study area of this project is mainly in the health facilities despite the level and ranks of the health facility.
|
Criterion Score |
Learner Self-Evaluation Score (0-3) |
Chair or Score (0-3) |
Reviewer Score (0-3) |
|
Nature of the Research Design for the Study This section describes the specific research design to answer the research questions and why this approach was selected. Here, the learner discusses why the selected design is the best design to address the problem statement and research questions as compared to other designs. This section contains a description of the research sample being studied, as well as the process that will be used to collect the data on the sample. The recommended length for this section is two to three paragraphs and must address each criterion. |
|||
|
26. Identifies and describes the selected design for the study. |
2 |
|
|
|
27. This justifies why the selected design addresses the problem statement and research questions. 28. Quantitative Studies: Justifies the selected design based on the appropriateness of the design to address the research questions and data for each variable. 29. Qualitative Studies: Justifies the selected design based on the appropriateness of design to address research questions and study the phenomenon. |
1 |
|
|
|
30. Briefly describes the target population and sample for the study. |
2 |
|
|
|
31. Identifies the sources and instruments that will be used to collect data needed to answer the research questions. |
1 |
|
|
|
32. Briefly describes data collection procedures to collect data on the sample. |
2 |
|
|
|
33. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
2 |
|
|
|
NOTE: This section also elaborates on the Design portion of the Methodology and Design section in the 10 Strategic Points . This section provides the foundation for the Nature of the Research Design for the Study in Chapter 1. |
|||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Sources of Data
This research will obtain data from mainly from questionnaires that will be drafted and be sent through patients and other stuff who willing to give us feedback (Schmiegelow at el 2016). Additionally, there will be the use of face to face conversations with patients to have clear feedback on how the treatment is being done in the health facility. Similarly, we will conduct some interviews that will help us have more data collection and accurately on the same factors.
|
Criterion Score |
Learner Self-Evaluation Score (0-3) |
Chair or Score (0-3) |
Reviewer Score (0-3) |
|
RESEARCH MATERIALS, INSTRUMENTATION, OR SOURCES OF DATA This section identifies and describes the types of data that will be collected, as well as the specific research materials, instruments, and sources used to collect those data (tests, surveys, validated instruments, questionnaires, interview protocols, databases, media, etc.). The recommended length for this section is one to two paragraphs. Note: this section can be set up as a bulleted list. |
|||
|
Quantitative- Instruments/Research Materials : Provides a bulleted list of the instrumentation and/or materials for data collection. Describes the survey instruments or equipment/materials used (experimental research) and specifies the type and level of data collected with each instrument. Includes citations from original publications by instrument developers (and subsequent users as appropriate) or related studies. |
1 |
|
|
|
Qualitative - Sources of Data: Describes the structure of each data collection instrument and data sources (tests, questionnaires, interview protocols, observations databases, media, etc.). |
1 |
|
|
|
The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
1 |
|
|
NOTE: This section elaborates on the Data Collection from the 10 Strategic Points.This information is summarized high level in Chapter 1 in the Proposal in the Nature of the Research Design for the Study section. This section provides the foundation for Research Materials, Instrumentation (quantitative), or Sources of Data (qualitative) section in Chapter 3. |
|||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Data Collection
The data will be collected through having patients who are at least in a stable condition in that they can have that freeway of having the ideas of contains the study. I will consider having one patient after another so that I will judge the information that they are providing if it's legible for the study (Iland at el 2015). I will also use the questioners that will not involve the addition of the names of the response in order to keep the information private and protect patients from any harm from their responses.
The process will be as follows:
· Interviews will involve three respondents who have taken the therapy, and they have been subjected to errors.
· Respondents will respond in one data collection methodology if he has responded in an interview, he will not be allowed to have the questionnaires.
|
Criteria |
Learner Self-Evaluation Score (0-3) |
Chair or Score (0-3) |
Reviewer Score (0-3) |
|
DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT This section details the data collection process and procedures so that another researcher could conduct or replicate the study. It includes authorizations and detailed steps. The recommended length for this section is a bullet or numbered list of data collection steps that should not exceed one page. |
|||
|
Quantitative Studies: Lists steps for the actual data collection that would allow replication of the study by another researcher, including how each instrument or data source was used, how and where data were collected and recorded. Includes a linear sequence of actions or step-by-step procedures used to carry out all the major steps for data collection. Includes a workflow and corresponding timeline, presenting a logical, sequential, and transparent protocol for data collection that would allow another researcher to replicate the study. Data from different sources may have to be collected in parallel (e.g., paper-and-pen surveys for teachers, corresponding students, and their parents AND retrieval of archival data from the school district). A flow chart is ok—"linear" may not apply to all situations Qualitative Studies: Provides a detailed description of the data collection process, including all sources of data and methods used, such as interviews, member checking, observations, surveys, field tests, and expert panel review. Note: The collected data must be sufficient in breadth and depth to answer the research question(s) and interpreted and presented correctly, by theme, research question, and/or source of data. |
2 |
|
|
|
Describes the procedures for obtaining participant informed consent and for protecting the rights and well-being of the study sample participants. |
2 |
|
|
|
The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
2 |
|
|
|
NOTE: This section elaborates on the Sample and Location and Data Collection in the 10 Strategic Points . This section provides the foundation for the Data Collection Procedures section in Chapter 3 in the Proposal. And it is summarized high level in Chapter 1 in Nature of the Research Design for the Study in the Proposal. |
|||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Data Analysis Procedures
The data will be taken through the interviews and having the questioners done appropriately (Winick at el 2017). Errors will be checked if they are in the data collection samples so that they can be answered correctly.
· Data will be collected, and analyzed feedback be drawn for the study.
· The description of data will be among the key elements that will help have clear data after collection.
· An executive summary will be drawn.
|
Criteria |
Learner Self-Evaluation Score (0-3) |
Chair or Score (0-3) |
Reviewer Score (0-3) |
|
DATA ANALYSIS PROCEDURES This section provides detailed steps for the analytic procedures to be used to conduct data analysis. The recommended length for this section is one to two paragraphs, can also be presented in a bulleted format. |
|||
|
Describes in detail the relevant data collected for each stated research question and/or each variable within each hypothesis (if applicable). Quantitative Studies: "In detail" means scales (and subscales) of specified instruments AND type of data for each variable of interest. IMPORTANT: For (quasi) experimental studies, provide a detailed description of all treatment materials per treatment condition, as part of the description of the independent variable corresponding to the experimental manipulation. |
2 |
|
|
|
What: Describes, in detail, statistical and non-statistical analysis to be used and procedures used to conduct the data analysis. Quantitative Studies: (1) describe data file preparation (descriptive statistics used to check completeness and accuracy; for files from different sources, possibly aggregating data to obtain a common unit of analysis in all files, necessarily merging files (using the key variable defining the unit of analysis); (2) computation of statistics for the sample profile; (3) computation of (subscales and) scales; (4) reliability analysis for all scales and subscales; (5) computation of descriptive statistics for all variables of interest in the study (except those already presented in the sample profile); (6) state and justify all statistical procedures ("tests") needed to generate the information to answer all research questions; and (7) state assumptions checks for all those statistical procedures (including the tests and / or charts to be computed). Qualitative Studies: This section begins by identifying and discussing the specific analysis approach or strategy, followed by a discussion of coding procedures to be used. Note: coding procedures may be different for Thematic Analysis, Narrative Analysis, Phenomenological Analysis, or Grounded Theory Analysis. |
2 |
|
|
|
Why: Provides the justification for each of the (statistical and non-statistical) data analysis procedures used in the study. |
2 |
|
|
|
Show Steps that Support Evidence Quantitative Analysis - states the level of statistical significance for each test as appropriate and describes tests of assumptions for each statistical test. Qualitative Analysis - evidence of qualitative analysis approaches, such as coding and the theming process, must be completely described and included in the analysis /interpretation process. Clear evidence from how codes moved to themes must be presented. |
2 |
|
|
|
The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
2 |
|
|
|
NOTE: This section elaborates on the Data Analysis from the 10 Strategic Points. This section provides the foundation for the Data Analysis Procedures section in Chapter 3 in the Proposal.
|
|||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Ethical Considerations
The data collection will be done in a Signiant manner without disclosing the names of the respondents. This project will focus on study, nor will it be used to sue any health institution. I will seek permission from the university and the head health headquarters to be enabled to seek information from patients (Duncan, at el 2015) I will also ensure the administrative heads of the health facility have understood my intentions of the study.
|
Criteria |
Learner Self-Evaluation Score (0-3) |
Chair or Score (0-3) |
Reviewer Score (0-3) |
|
Ethical Considerations This section discusses the potential ethical issues surrounding the research, as well as how human subjects and data will be protected. It identifies how any potential ethical issues will be addressed. The recommended length for this section is one paragraph. |
|||
|
1. Describes the site authorization process, subject recruiting, and informed consent processes. |
2 |
|
|
|
2. Describes how the identities of the participants in the study and data will be protected. |
2 |
|
|
|
3. Discusses potential ethical concerns that might occur during the data collection process. |
2 |
|
|
|
4. ALIGNMENT: Ethical considerations are clearly aligned with and relate directly to the specific Data Collection Procedures. This section also identifies ethical considerations related to the target population being researched and organization or location, as described in the Purpose Statement section. |
2 |
|
|
|
The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
2 |
|
|
|
NOTE: This section does not include information from any of the 10 Strategic Points. This section provides the foundation for the Ethical Considerations section in Chapter 3 in the Proposal. |
|||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Literature review
Theoretical Foundations/Conceptual Framework and Review of the Literature/Themes
It is of great importance to comprehend the impacts of committing errors, especially when it comes to the lives of people. Health care institutions should have great regard for containing patients and meeting their conditions in Leukemia as it is a killer disease complication (Ravandi at el 2015). The administration should have a clear guideline in supporting patients positively on their health conditions that should have caused a lot of pain to patients. Patients are key stakeholders in the health section on having the treatments on having the best ways of having contained people of critical conditions such as Leukemia from disastrous ways of meeting their medications.
Literature Themes
Patients safety is a factor that has arisen concern on both society and policymakers in the administrative sectors of health institutions. Health organizations have created awareness that errors have large and unacceptable effects on both costs and public confidence in health organizations. Patients' injuries resulting from drug therapy are among the common hospital adverse patient events that should be given close checking of the institutions and the organization's feedback.
Themes of the review of the literature review include:
· Lack of proper monitoring of nursing students: When students are newbies into the field, they should be given full supervision on sensitive precautions that have to be taken by patients. Dealing with the lives of patients, it is important to have a more concern matrix of having student nurses to handle small instances.
· The fear of reporting situations. Some administrative errors get buried because of the fear that the health facility will spoil their reputation on committing fatal mistakes on Leukemia patients since the condition is sensitive, and it needs proper care.
Summary
The research will show how young Leukemia patients have been suffering from the sharp rays of chemotherapy. The young patients should be prescribed to the dosage that does not bring a big impact on killing many body cells since they are not fully developed.
|
Criteria |
Learner Self-Evaluation Score (0-3) |
Chair or Score (0-3) |
Reviewer Score (0-3) |
|
Theoretical Foundations and/or Conceptual Framework This section identifies the theory(s) or model(s) that provide the foundation for the research. This section should present the theory(s) or models(s) and explain how the problem under investigation relates to the theory or model. The theory(s) or models(s) guide the research questions and justify what is being measured (variables) as well as how those variables are related (quantitative) or the phenomena being investigated (qualitative). Review of the Literature/Themes This section provides a broad, balanced overview of the existing literature related to the proposed research topic. It describes the literature in related topic areas and its relevance to the proposed research topic findings, providing a short 3-4 sentence description of each theme and identifies its relevance to the research problem supporting it with at least two citations from the empirical literature from the past 3-5 years. The recommended length for this section is 1 paragraph for Theoretical Foundations and a bulleted list for the Literature Themes section. |
|||
|
1. Theoretical Foundations section identifies the theory(s), model(s) relevant to the variables (quantitative study), or phenomenon (qualitative study). This section should explain how the study topic or problem coming out of the "need" or "defined gap" in them as described in the Background to the Problem section relates to the theory(s) or model(s) presented in this section. (One paragraph) |
1 |
|
|
|
2. Review of the Literature Themes section: This section is a bulleted list of the major themes or topics related to the research topic. Each theme or topic should have a one-two sentence summary. |
1.5 |
|
|
|
3. ALIGNMENT: The Theoretical Foundations models and theories need to be related to and support the problem statement or study topic. The sections in the Review of the Literature are topical areas needed to understand the various aspects of the phenomenon (qualitative) or variables/groups (quantitative) being studied; to select the design needed to address the Problem Statement; to select surveys or instruments to collect information on variables/groups; to define the population and sample for the study; to describe components or factors that comprise the phenomenon; to describe key topics related to the study topic, etc. |
1.5 |
|
|
|
4. The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
1 |
|
|
|
NOTE: The two parts of this section use information about the Literature Review and Theoretical Foundations/Conceptual Framework from the 10 Strategic Points. This Theoretical Foundations section is expanded upon to become the Theoretical Foundations section in Chapter 2 (Literature Review). The Theoretical Foundations and the Literature Review sections are also used to help create the Advancing Scientific Knowledge/Review of the Literature section in Chapter 2 (Literature Review). |
|||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Reference
Duncan, C. N., Majhail, N. S., Brazauskas, R., Wang, Z., Cahn, J. Y., Frangoul, H. A., ... & Khera, N. (2015). Long-term survival and late effects among one-year survivors of second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 21(1), 151-158.Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1083879114006314
Iland, H. J., Collins, M., Bradstock, K., Supple, S. G., Catalano, A., Hertzberg, M., ... & Hugman, A. (2015). Use of arsenic trioxide in remission induction and consolidation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia in the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) APML4 study: a non-randomized phase 2 trial. The Lancet Haematology, 2(9), e357-e366.Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352302615001155
Jones, A. K., Freise, K. J., Agarwal, S. K., Humerickhouse, R. A., Wong, S. L., & Salem, A. H. (2016). Clinical predictors of venetoclax pharmacokinetics in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: a pooled population pharmacokinetic analysis. The AAPS Journal, 18(5), 1192-1202.Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1208/s12248-016-9927-9
Mohammadi, M., Cao, Y., Glimelius, I., Bottai, M., Eloranta, S., & Smedby, K. E. (2015). The impact of comorbid disease history on all-cause and cancer-specific mortality in myeloid leukemia and myeloma–a Swedish population-based study. BMC Cancer, 15(1), 850.Retrieved from: https://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12885-015-1857-x
Ravandi, F., Ritchie, E. K., Sayar, H., Lancet, J. E., Craig, M. D., Vey, N., ... & Pigneux, A. (2015). vosaroxin plus cytarabine versus placebo plus cytarabine in patients with first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (VALOR): a randomized, controlled, double-blind, multinational, phase 3 study. The lancet oncology, 16(9), 1025-1036.Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673614614033
Rubio, M. T., Savani, B. N., Labopin, M., Piemontese, S., Polge, E., Ciceri, F., ... & Gülbas, Z. (2016). Impact of conditioning intensity in T-replete haploidentical stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia: a report from acute leukemia working party of the EBMT. Journal of hematology & oncology, 9(1), 25.Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13045-016-0248-3
Schmiegelow, K., Attarbaschi, A., Barzilai, S., Escherich, G., Frandsen, T. L., Halsey, C., ... & Mikkelsen, T. S. (2016). Consensus definitions of 14 severe acute toxic effects for childhood lymphoblastic leukemia treatment: a Delphi consensus. The Lancet Oncology, 17(6), e231-e239.Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1470204516300353
Winick, N., Devidas, M., Chen, S., Maloney, K., Larsen, E., Mattano, L., ... & Willman, C. (2017). Impact of initial CSF findings on outcome among patients with National Cancer Institute standard-and high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35(22), 2527.Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536164/
