Business Finance - Management DMAIC Case Study Assignment

Criteria Ratings Points

Abstract, Introduction, Case Study ‘Plan’

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

Abstract clearly states the purpose and main conclusion and Introduction provides a complete overview of the discussion. Provides a complete discussion for doing a case study to include the overarching case study ‘plan’. Flow is logical and fully cited.

9 to >8 pts

Proficient

Abstract and Introduction provides a partial purpose, main conclusion, and overview of the discussion and provides a partial discussion for doing a case study to include the overarching case study ‘plan’. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Abstract and Introduction present but does not provide an adequate overview of the discussion and provides a minimal discussion for doing a case study to include the overarching case study ‘plan’. Flow is not logical and/or insufficiently cited.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

10 pts

Define Phase

17 to >15 pts

Advanced

Section provides a comprehensive description of the Define Phase (includes key steps such as: customers, problem statement, resources, crucial support, high-level process map, etc.). Flow is logical and fully cited.

15 to >14 pts

Proficient

Section provides a partial description of the Define Phase (includes most key steps such as: customers, problem statement, resources, crucial support, high-level process map, etc.). Flow is logical and partially cited.

14 to >0 pts

Developing

Section provides a minimal description of the Define Phase (includes few key steps such as: customers, problem statement, resources, crucial support, high-level process map, etc.). Flow is not logical and/or insufficiently cited.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

17 pts

Measure Phase

17 to >15 pts

Advanced

Section provides a complete and thorough description of the Measure Phase (includes key steps such as: defects, opportunities, units, metrics, data collection plan, validating the measurement system, etc.). Flow is logical and fully cited.

15 to >14 pts

Proficient

Section provides a partial description of the Measure Phase (includes most key steps such as: defects, opportunities, units, metrics, data collection plan, validating the measurement system, etc.). Flow is mostly logical and partially cited.

14 to >0 pts

Developing

Section provides a minimal description of the Measure Phase (includes few key steps such as: defects, opportunities, units, metrics, data collection plan, validating the measurement system, etc.). Flow is not logical and/or insufficiently cited.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

17 pts

DMAIC Case Study Assignment Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B02_202530

Criteria Ratings Points

Analyze Phase

17 to >15 pts

Advanced

Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis, evaluation, and synthesis of the analyze phase (includes key steps such as: performance objectives, value vs NVA, opportunities to improve root cause, variation, etc.). Accurately demonstrates triangulation. Flow is logical and fully cited.

15 to >14 pts

Proficient

Mostly demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis, evaluation, synthesize of the analyze phase (includes most key steps such as: performance objectives, value vs NVA, opportunities to improve root cause, variation, etc.). Mostly correct triangulation. Flow is mostly logical and/or partially cited.

14 to >0 pts

Developing

Only partially demonstrates critical thinking, analysis, evaluation, and/or limited synthesis of analyze phase (includes few key steps such as: performance objectives, value vs NVA, opportunities to improve root cause, variation, etc.). Triangulation is not demonstrated correctly. Flow is not logical and/or insufficiently cited.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

17 pts

Improve Phase

17 to >15 pts

Advanced

Section provides a complete and thorough description of the Improve Phase (includes key steps such as: experiments, solutions, operating tolerances, implementing the best solution, etc.). Flow is logical and fully cited.

15 to >14 pts

Proficient

Section provides a partial description of the Improve Phase (includes most key steps such as: experiments, solutions, operating tolerances, implementing the best solution, etc.). Flow is mostly logical and partially cited.

14 to >0 pts

Developing

Section provides a minimal description of the Improve Phase (includes few key steps such as: experiments, solutions, operating tolerances, implementing the best solution, etc.). Flow is not logical and/or insufficiently cited.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

17 pts

Control Phase

17 to >15 pts

Advanced

Section provides a complete and thorough description of the Control Phase (includes key steps such as: standards, process control/capability, documentation/report, etc.). Flow is logical and fully cited.

15 to >14 pts

Proficient

Section provides a partial description of the Control Phase (includes most key steps such as: standards, process control/capability, documentation/report, etc.). Flow is mostly logical and partially cited.

14 to >0 pts

Developing

Section provides a minimal description of the Control Phase (includes few key steps such as: standards, process control/capability, documentation/report, etc.). Flow is not logical and/or insufficiently cited.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

17 pts

DMAIC Case Study Assignment Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B02_202530

Criteria Ratings Points

Conclusion & Biblical Worldview Integration

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

Conclusion provides a complete summary of the discussion and highlights key points as well as a thoroughly integrated biblical worldview with at least 1 scripture reference.

9 to >8 pts

Proficient

Conclusion provides a partial summary of the discussion and highlights at least one key point and a partially integrated biblical worldview with at least 1 scripture reference.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Conclusion present but does not summarize discussion or highlight key points and either a reference to a biblical worldview or no scripture reference.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed.

10 pts

APA Format and Structure, References, and Citations, Grammar, Spelling, Mechanics, Composition

23 to >21 pts

Advanced

APA formatting and structure are followed, all references and citations correspond to each other and are formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, and all assertions are supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition are all correct.

21 to >19 pts

Proficient

APA formatting and structure are mostly followed, most references and citations correspond to each other and are formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, and most assertions are supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Minor errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition.

19 to >0 pts

Developing

APA formatting and structure are not followed, most references and citations do not correspond to each other and/or are not formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, and most assertions are not supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Significant number of errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition.

0 pts

Not Present

There are many errors in mechanics, composition, grammar, no Lean Six Sigma Tools.

23 pts

Sources/ Word Count

22 to >20 pts

Advanced

Eight or more peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. The book sources provided are Yin (2018), Keller, and the Bible only. Word Count is thorough (2400-3000 words).

20 to >18 pts

Proficient

Seven to Six peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. The book sources provided are Yin (2018), Keller, and the Bible only. Word Count is Satisfactory (+/- 2%)

18 to >0 pts

Developing

Five to One peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. The book sources provided are Yin (2018), Keller, and the Bible only. Word Count is insufficient (+/- 3-4%)

0 pts

Not Present

No structure or formatting provided. Missing references and/or citations are rare, repetitious or non-existent or Word Count (> +/-4%)

22 pts

Total Points: 150

DMAIC Case Study Assignment Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B02_202530