Revisions are needed on the paper I submitted for school. I have uploaded a file titled default.pdf which explains. Any section that scored less than a 3 needs to be revised. Please read teachers comments. Aspects B3, B5, C2 - C2f, D1 and D2 require addre
Contents Chapter 01 - Introduction 4 Background 4 Islamic banking in UK 5 Research Objectives 5 Research questions 5 Chapter 02 - Literature review 6 Islamic banking in UK 7 Chapter 03 Methodology 7 Research Paradigms 7 Research design 8 Research strategy 8 Importance of cross sectional and its limitations 9 Limitations of cross sectional study 9 Reason behind selection of Altman Z-Score 9 Advantages of this method of data collection 10 Reflection on Research 10 Data analysis strategy 10 Sample design and sample process 10 Sample size 10 Research ethics 10 Key findings and analysis 11 Table: 4.1 – Z-Score achieved by Islamic banks from (2006-2010) 12 Chart – 4.1 – Z-Score achieved by Islamic banks from (2006-2010) 12 Table: 4.2 – Z-Score of conventional banks from (2006-2010) 12 Chart: 4.2 – Z-Score of conventional banks from (2006-2010) 13 Average Z-Score of Islamic banks and conventional banks 13 Table: 4.3 – Average Z-Score of conventional banks and Islamic banks from (2006-2010) 13 Chart: 4.3 – Average Z-Score of Islamic and conventional banks from (2006-2010) 13 Variances analysis 14 Working capital/Total assets 14 Chart: 4.4 – Working capital/Total assets ratio of Islamic and conventional banks from (2006-2010) 15 Retained earnings/Total assets 15 Chart: 4.5 – Retained earnings/Total assets ratio of Islamic and conventional banks from (2006-2010) 15 EBIT/Total Assets 16 Chart: 4.6 – EBIT/Total assets of Islamic and conventional banks from (2006-2010) 16 Total Equities/Total Liabilities 17 Average growth in total assets of Islamic Banks and conventional banks 17 Chart: 4.8 – Average growth in total assets Islamic and conventional banks from (2006-2010) 17 Average growth in operating profit of Islamic and conventional banks 18 Chart: 4.9 – Average growth in operating profits of Islamic and conventional banks from (2006-2010) 18 An overall Z-Score & Yearly Analysis 18 Conventional Banks performance during 2006 to 2010 18 2006 19 2007 19 2008 20 2009 20 2010 20 Country wise analysis 20 Chart: 4.13 – Average Z-score - Qatar 22 Country wise analysis 23 UAE 23 BAHRAIN 23 SAUDI ARABIA 23 KUWAIT 24 QATAR 24 Questionnaire analysis 25 Descriptive Statistics 27 Correlations – Measuring efficiency 27 Coefficientsa 29 Correlations – Growth opportunities for Islamic banks in UK 30 Chapter - 06 32 Conclusion 32 Recommendation 33 Limitation of study 34 Implication for further research 34 References 35 Appendix 1.A – Z core of Islamic and conventional banks 39 Appendix 1 – Z score of Islamic banks 40 Appendix 1.1 – Z score of Conventional banks 41 Appendix 02 – Division of Islamic banks into each area 42 Appendix 03 – Division of Conventional banks into each area 43 Appendix – 04 – Growth in Total assets of Islamic banks 44 Appendix – 05 – Growth in Total assets of conventional banks 45 Appendix 06 – Growth in operating profits of Islamic banks 46 Appendix 07 – Growth in operating profits of Islamic banks 47 Appendix 08 - Productivity of the Banks assets: EBIT/Total assets - Islamic banks 48 Appendix 09 - Productivity of the Banks assets: EBIT/Total assets - Conventional banks 49 Appendix – 10 – Retention ratio: Retained earning/Total assets – Islamic banks 50 Appendix – 11 – Retention ratio: Retained earning/Total assets – Conventional banks 51 Appendix – 12 – Liquidity measures – Working capital/Total assets – Islamic banks 52 Appendix – 13 – Liquidity measures – Working capital/Total assets – Conventional banks 53 Appendix – 14 – Total equity/Total liabilities – Islamic banks 54 Appendix – 15 – Total equity/Total liabilities – Conventional banks 55 Appendix – 16 & 17 – Country wise analysis – UAE and Bahrain 56 Appendix – 18 & 19 – Country wise analysis – Saudi Arabia & Kuwait 57 Appendix – 20 – Country wise analysis – Qatar 58 Appendix – 21 – Frequencies of answering questions 59 Appendix 22 - Descriptive Statistics 60 Appendix – 23 – Correlations – Measuring efficiency 61 Appendix - 24 - Variables Entered/Removeda 63 Appendix – 25 - Model Summary 63 Appendix 26 - ANOVAa 63 Appendix – 27 – Correlations – Growth opportunities for Islamic banks in UK 65
Measuring Banks financial stability during subprime mortgage crisis in Islamic countries, an implication for UK Islamic mortgage market
Abstract
UK is going to become the financial hub for Islamic banking. Lot of research has already been conducted on this area on both qualitative and quantitative prospects. First part of this report explains and compares the performance of Islamic banking and conventional banking. Basic objective was to find out their level of risk and chances of bankruptcy. For this purpose Altman Z score has been used.
Results indicate that Islamic banks performance much better than conventional banks. This research focuses on 2006 to 2010 because this period covers the period of before credit crisis, during credit crisis and after credit crisis. It has been find out that Islamic bank’s Z score was far better than conversational banks and they were away from risk of bankruptcy. There were none of the Islamic bank were in danger zone during credit crisis.
It has been found out that Islamic banks performance has already been affected however it is mainly due to other factors but not credit crisis.
Second part of this research focuses on customer satisfaction with Islamic banking in UK. Overall customers were happy however they have few main concerns like product development as currently not all of the products fulfil their criteria.
Chapter 01 - Introduction
Background
Islamic bank refers to an institution which direct all banking activities similar to conventional banking system but without interest. In short Islamic banks borrow and lend money without interest. Sharing profit and loss is one of the key tools of Islamic banking system (Al-Jarhi, 2001).
There are more than 400 Islamic banks are working in 75 countries of the world with total assets of more than $1.1 trillion in 2012 with 20% growth. (Earnest & Young Report 2012)
(Hull 2002) identified that organizations are formed to generate profits and Islamic banks also work on the same basis. (Khan, 1986) identified that the major difference between Islamic and conventional banking is prohibition of interest (Riba) as mention in Quran.
Financial system plays a very important role in the development of economy of any country and now this system is affected by very sever crisis (Stiglitz, 2003).
Islamic banking in UK
According to (ONS, 201I) there are nearly 2.7 million Muslims living in UK, which comprises 4.8% of the total population. Muslim community in UK create a great demand for Islamic banking products. Legal framework and regulatory authorities are doing their best to provide Islamic banking services in UK (Rahman 2012).
Causes of bank crisis
Toxic assets were the biggest issue during the subprime crisis. This term became very famous during the credit crunch. Assets are the good guys on the balance sheet? Well only when they are not toxic (Ryan 2009).
Actually investment banks pool a number of mortgages together and then use them as collateral for an investment security called CDO’S (collateralised debt obligation). When investment banks securities these loans they divide them into groups, which called tranches, based on how risky they are? In the banks point of view insecurity made its money when an investor brought into a CDO tranche. The investors in a CDO were paid when the homeowner made a mortgage payment.. in security offered different rates of return because each tranche has different risks. So investor gets high returns on last and risky tranche due to which their demand increase. Same thing was there for subprime mortgages those were also in the risky tranche. So investors were attracted for investment due to high rate of return. Securitization achieved through by transferring the lending the specifically created companies called SPV (special purpose vehicle). So investors even get the interest if subprime mortgage holders fail to make the payment because these SPV issued bonds. Ryan (2009)
Actually CDO’s are a way of repackaging the risk of a large number of risky assets such as subprime mortgages. Walter (2008)
Research Objectives
· To analyse the performance of Islamic banks in Islamic countries against conventional banking system
· To examine the methods used by Islamic banking system against subprime crisis against conventional system.
· To identify the root causes of subprime crisis in the UK
· To establish the characteristics of subprime crisis in UK
· To draw conclusions about demand of Islamic banking products in UK
Research questions
· Which banking system was near to bankruptcy in Islamic countries
· What are the main characteristics which were preventing a bank from bankruptcy during credit crisis?
· What were the root causes of subprime crisis in UK?
· Could Islamic banking fulfil non-Muslims requirements in UK?
Chapter 02
Literature review
Hassan and Dridi (2012) compare the performance of Islamic banking and conventional banking on basis of profitability and growth in total assets during the credit crisis, and finds that Islamic banks showed better resilience during these crises. According to (Parashar & Venkatesh, 2010) Islamic banking also effected by credit crisis however their performance was still better than conventional banking system. Beck et al (2010) analysed leverage, capital ratio and return on equity of both financial system and find out that Islamic banking system is superior in liquidity reserves and credit risk. According to (Ozturk, 2008) implementation of sharing profit and loss between financial institution and investors results in full disclosure and very transparent results which leads to a very high market discipline and judicious control over unnecessary lending.
Global financial crisis pushed developed pushed developed countries like UK to develop a new financial system who to tackle such crisis. This crisis forced them to decrease their interest rates to the historical minimal level. Conventional system look has failed after this crisis and looking for a major overhaul to resolve all current problems (Ilias, 2010). Current conventional system badly affected by current financial crisis. (Trabelsi, 2011) identified that risk alleviation at different level was the main cause of this crisis.
Mishkin (1997) indicated that there are two factors which assure growth in profits of banks. These are collaterals and guaranteed bailout from central banks. According to (Kayed & Hassan 2009) root causes of financial crisis was lending without checking credit history. Wilson (2007) identifies that sub-prime borrowers were the main cause of financial crisis. Siddique (2008) and Loundy (2008) find out that failed morality causes the corruption and greed which leads to failure of relationship between investment originator and investor. According to (Mirakhor and Krichene, 2009) it was due to regulation and excessive risk taking. According to (Rahman, 2009) Islamic banking is safe because of two reasons, prohibition of interest and secondly, Islamic banking do not trade in money market which leads to no more liquidity problem which currently UK is facing now. Rahman (2009) further identified that Islamic banking does not trade in intangible assets so all complex financial derivatives are not allowed.
According to (IFSB et al, 2010) key difference between Islamic banking and conventional banking is interest. It further explained that Islamic banking does not invest in such kinds of instruments adversely affected conventional banking products during the credit crisis like toxic assets, financial derivatives and financial institution securities. According to (Beck et al, 2010) important feature of Islamic banking products is risk sharing between depositor and borrower. According to (Hassan and Dridi, 2010) key feature of conventional banking system is risk transfer and key feature of Islamic banking system is risk sharing.
According to (Dar and Presley, 2002) Islamic banking products are very expensive and less transparent as compare to conventional banking products. Alam (2004) identifies that customers always think about cost of similar services. If they get same product in cheaper prices through a conventional banking system then why they should pay extra for same services.
Mortgage backed securities allow lenders to resell the mortgage documents Amadeo (2007). This cause the creating of toxic assets which was one of the major cause of US recession which lead to worldwide effect Peavler (2010). Actually banks want to generate cash to cover up their cash flow shortfall. Such documents they were showing as their assets so they start selling them. Davidson (2008) is not agreeing that CDO are bad thing because there is huge demand for such assets because these assets caused the way to boost the demand in investment of properties.
Islamic banking in UK
According to (Wade, 2009) size is Islamic banking in UK is bigger than Pakistan. He further identified that not only Muslims people use Islamic banking but non-Muslims also uses because they feel more secure. As identified by (Rahman, 2009) higher cost is not the only indicator to measure the performance but risk is also very important. According to (Alam, 2004) there are lot of issues with Islamic banking in UK. Most important is double stamp duty especially in case of Islamic mortgages, as mortgage based on co-ownerships and both parties owned the mortgage. He further argued that Islamic products are expensive although there are huge number of Muslims live in UK but not every can afford such prices.
Islamic financial industry is different from conventional in operation. So there are lots of legal and accounting issues, which we have to obtain Din (2004). So there are separate recognized accounting rules. All new Islamic products must be recognized according to the Islamic laws and rules to get more transparent information. For this purpose in 1990 accounting and auditing organization for Islamic financial institutions (AAOIFI) was created. It plays a crucial role in pursuing the harmonization of shariah based rulings.
Mustafa (2013) argued that the problem is supervisory bodies in different countries like to rely on their own shariah experts so it creates a problem in showing the transactions. Secondly experts have different opinions about different products something that these are permissible in one country but in other countries expert’s opinion are different so it arises and discourage the cross border use of Islamic products and constrain the growth potential of this industry which shows the results less transparent.
Chapter 03 Methodology
Research Paradigms
According to (Collis and Hussey, 2003) there are two types of research paradigms. One is positivistic and other is phenomenological. We use positivistic for quantitative and phenomenological for qualitative research. According to (Khan, 2008) quantitative research strategy emphasis on quantification in collection and analysis of financial data. However qualitative research can be interpreted as a research strategy which focuses on words rather than quantification and analysis of data (Hussy and Hussy, 1997)
As explained in introduction chapter this research contains two parts. Part one focuses on financial analysis of banking sector in Islamic to find out there chance of bankruptcy. Second chapter focuses on implication of findings from part one in UK.
Research design
According to Fox and Long (1990) if researcher will select different types of research design it will affect his/her findings. According to (Hussy and Hussy, 1997) there are four categories of research.
These are
Descriptive research (What is going on)
Experimental research (Why is it going on)
Historical research
Developmental action research
According to (Saunders et al 2000) all social research must be structure before collection and analysis of data. According to him first you have to explore the research then describe it which leads to explaining and evaluating the research. In this report research is use descriptive research method.
Descriptive research should be taken with objective of describing all relevant aspects of research area (Saunders et al 2000). He further identified two types of descriptive research, cross sectional and longitudinal. Researcher will use cross sectional in the first part. For this purpose Altman Z score will be used to identify the bankruptcy risk in Islamic countries during a specific time horizon. In this part researcher will rely on secondary source of data which are audited financial statements which are available on the websites of financial institutes.
In the second part researcher will use explanatory and evaluation research. In this part researcher will rely on primary source of data.
This method is known as triangulation. According to (Smith, 1975) one of the principle aim of triangulation is corroboration of findings from one part with another as it reduces the risks of systematic biases. Quantitative is less expensive as there is no need to contact with financial institutes to collect the data. However for qualitative we need to analyse the strategies of individuals and need to get information through questionnaires and interviews which are time consuming and expensive. (Foddy, 1994)
Research strategy
There are two parts of this research
· To identify bankruptcy risk a comparative analysis of Islamic and conventional banking system in Islamic countries
· Implication of Islamic banking in UK
For first part research will undertake quantitative research method. This method emphasizes on the financial analysis to find out corporate failure rate. For this part research will use Altman Z score to find out the banks worth during, before and after credit crisis
Importance of cross sectional and its limitations
As mentioned in literature review different countries follow different rules and they have different products. Most important thing for Islamic banks to comply with local laws. So, a comparative analysis in the same country will make it easier for us to analyse.
Limitations of cross sectional study
Although Altman Z score is the best suitable way to identify the chances of bankruptcy however there are some limitations. This method work around one point that how longitudinal process studied over a period of time. However it supposed to change constantly.
Perhaps the most important weakness is relying solely on Z score models. So all results will be based on past results and it might not reflect in the future.
Reason behind selection of Altman Z-Score
This model design by Dr. Edward Altman in 1968 to measure the bankruptcy rate among the companies. It consists of five different ratios, which are also known as its variables. This model is very helpful to measure the financial health of the company. It forecasts the probability of bankruptcy. Important features of this model include accuracy up to 80% and its results are reliable up to 2 years. (Wahlen et al, 2011)
Second part of this research includes implication of Islamic banking in UK. This part mainly focuses on impact of Islamic banking on Muslims and non-Muslims living in UK and what people think about Islamic banking especially after credit crisis. Research will use qualitative method. This type of research mainly focuses on consumer perception. There are different criteria and techniques that can be used in qualitative methods. Few of the most important are as follows;
Questionnaire/Interview
Focus group
Case study
Direct observation
Role play and simulation
Researcher decided to choose close ended questionnaires because it is more appropriate method. According to (Saunders et al 2000) questionnaires are one of the most widely used data collection method. Questionnaires can be used for used for descriptive or exploratory research. Descriptive research undertakes opinion and attitudes however explanatory or analytical research will enable us to examine the relationship between variables (Gill and Johnson, 1997). According to (Saunders et al, 2000) these two purposes have different research design requirements. So we will focus on explanatory method and develop close ended questionnaires to know the attitude of people regarding Islamic banking in UK.
Advantages of this method of data collection
According to (Miller, 2011) questionnaires permit respondents time to consider their responses carefully without interference. There will be uniformity and each respondent received the identical number of questions. It can be address a large number of issues and questions of concern in an efficient way.
However (Miller, 2011) further identified that it may be difficult to obtain a good response rate due to low motivation for respondents to respond. A complex and badly designed can be misleading. In this method quality will not be as high as in other sources.
Reflection on Research
As researcher will measure the bankruptcy rates of different Islamic and conventional banks in different countries so data will be analysed between 2006 to 2011 to find out Altman Z score before credit crisis, during credit crisis and after credit crisis (post recovery period). According to (Altman et al 2010) higher score indicates better financial position of the company.
Data analysis strategy
For first part data will be analysed on excel. After finding Z score of selected sample banks data will further divide into three categories. 2006 before credit crisis, 2007-2008 during credit crisis and 2009 -2011 to analyse recovery growth.
In second part data will be collected through detail questionnaires. Researcher will use SPSS software to analyse all questions and results will further analysed and matched against our research objectives to find the answer of research questions.
Sample design and sample process
According to (Saunders et al 2000) population is a group of person, institutions or events which are aggregate of all cases that confirm to some design set of specifications. According to (Barnett, 1991) sampling frame is the list of record of population from which sampling units are drawn. Important point is that all members of population of interest are included in sample frame.
Sample size
Different authors give different opinion about sample size. According to (Henry, 1990) sample size of 30 is thought to be a good estimate of the population as larger sample will produce more accurate results. In first part research will select six countries (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar). According to (Hassan and Dridi, 2010) these banks represent 85% of the Total assets and 77% of market share. So from each country we will select three Islamic bank and three conventional banks and altogether it will be 20 banks. In second part of research a list of 33 questionnaires will be filled and data will be analysed on SPSS. All questions will be filled in London and surrounding area.
Source: (Hassan and Dridi, 2010)
Research ethics
In the first part researcher will only use published data. For this purpose secondary data will be used from published consolidated financial statements, research articles will be used. For second part primary source of data will be questionnaires from a sample of 33 will be filled. Precautions will be taken at the time of collection of primary data through provided enough time, concealing the true purpose of this research.
Chapter 4
Key findings and analysis
This chapter focuses on the key findings of this research. As the key purpose of this report is to find out the bankruptcy changes of Islamic and conventional banks before, during and after credit crisis. Year 2006 results show the before credit crisis results that how both types of banks were performing. 2007 and 2008 shows the performance during the credit crisis. Year 2009 used to measure the recovery progress of Islamic and conventional banks.
Altman Z-score model has been used to find out the results. There was combination of 20 banks half of them were Islamic and half of them were conventional from specific regions.
Altman Z-score measures and defined the bankruptcy chances through a score.
· A score of below 1.10 indicates that bank is moving toward bankruptcy
· A score between 1.10-2.60 indicates grey area (under observation)
· A score of more than 2.60 indicates that banks is very safe and far away from bankruptcy
Table: 4.1 – Z-Score achieved by Islamic banks from (2006-2010)
Source: Appendix 02
Chart – 4.1 – Z-Score achieved by Islamic banks from (2006-2010)
Source: Appendix 02
Table 4.1 indicates that before credit crisis (2006) 70% of the Islamic banks were on the safe area and only 10% were in the danger zone. However during the credit crisis none of the Islamic banks were struggling with going concern issue as all of them were in grey area (60%) and safe area (40%). However after credit crisis few of the Islamic banks (20%) were in danger zone. During 2010 they made a quick recovery to move into grey area.
Table: 4.2 – Z-Score of conventional banks from (2006-2010)
Source: Appendix 03
Table 4.2 indicates that even before credit crisis most of conventional banks were struggling and around 40% of them were in danger zone to become bankrupt. During credit crisis (2007 & 2008) most of the conventional bank entered from safe zone to grey area (60% during 2007 and 50% in 2008). Important point is that none of the conventional bank achieved to enter in the safe zone to avoid the risk of bankruptcy. However results in appendix 2 & 3 indicates that conventional banks recovery rate was faster than Islamic banks. During 2009 Islamic banks performance was not faster as like conventional because of Banks in Kuwait.
Chart: 4.2 – Z-Score of conventional banks from (2006-2010)
Source: Appendix 03
Average Z-Score of Islamic banks and conventional banks
Performance on basis of average Z-score of both conventional and Islamic banks indicates that there was huge gap between both of them as during 2006 Islamic banks average Z-score was almost three times bigger than conventional banks. During 2008 this different slightly decreased. During 2007 Conventional banks average score further decrease same as Islamic banks. After credit crisis conventional banks average score dramatically improved but still it was lower than Islamic banks. During 2010 conventional banks showed very dramatic improvements.
Table: 4.3 – Average Z-Score of conventional banks and Islamic banks from (2006-2010)
|
Years |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
|
Average Z-Score of Islamic Banks |
3.891 |
3.090 |
3.387 |
3.152 |
2.920 |
|
Average Z-score of Conventional Banks |
1.3713 |
1.2459 |
1.42955 |
1.99361 |
2.5131 |
Source: Appendix 01
Further more conventional banks average score was continuously improving after 2007 however Islamic banks Z-score was very inconsistent.
Chart: 4.3 – Average Z-Score of Islamic and conventional banks from (2006-2010)
Source: Appendix 01
Variances analysis
There were four main variables used by Altman in his model. These were as follows;
· Working capital/total assets: This variable assist to identify the liquidity position of the company
· Retained earnings/total assets: This variable assist to identify retention ratio of the banks. As higher retention ratio leads to high investment opportunities.
· EBIT/Total Assets: This variable assist to identify the profitability of the Islamic and conventional banks and utilisation of total assets to measure the efficiency.
· Total equity/Total Liabilities: This variable assist to identify the financial leverage of the banks. Higher leverage indicates higher risk, which leads to bankruptcy.
Working capital/Total assets
Working capital is the difference between current assets and current liabilities. This ratio finds out that Islamic banks liquidity position is better than convectional banks throughout. However conventional banks also shows slight improvement during 2010 in term of liquidity position. During 2006 this ratio was almost four times bigger than conventional banks. From 2006 to 2009 liquidity position of Islamic banks were very exceptional as compare to conventional banks.
Chart: 4.4 – Working capital/Total assets ratio of Islamic and conventional banks from (2006-2010)
Source: Appendix 12 & 13
Retained earnings/Total assets
A stable retention ratio makes valuation a less sensitive. Conventional banks has very stable retention ratio. During 2006 conventional banks retention ratio was 2.34% as compare to 1.55% of Islamic banks. Results shows that Islamic banks were retaining more money as compare to conventional banks. During 2007 Islamic and conventional banks both retain less money which indicates that they did not any opportunity to reinvest. During 2008 their retention ratio gone down dramatically to 1% for Islamic banks and to 1.84% for conventional banks. During recovery period they did opposite as Islamic banks ratio further decreased to .2% as compare to 2.32% for conventional banks, which indicates the level of projects they had to reinvest however during 2010 it changed to .74%.
Chart: 4.5 – Retained earnings/Total assets ratio of Islamic and conventional banks from (2006-2010)
Source: Appendix 10 & 11
EBIT/Total Assets
This ratio assist to identify the profitability level against total assets to measure their efficiency. This ratio indicates that before and during credit crunch Islamic banks performed better and utilised their assets in more better way than credit crisis. However after credit crunch during 2009 and 2010 conventional banks utilise their assets better than Islamic banks. As indicated in chart 4.6 there was a boom started in this ratio in conventional banking after credit crisis however in Islamic banking we have seen this during 2010 which indicates a little slow reaction from Islamic banking system
Chart: 4.6 – EBIT/Total assets of Islamic and conventional banks from (2006-2010)
Source: Appendix 08 & 09
Total Equities/Total Liabilities
This ratio measures the financial gearing of Islamic and conventional banks and defined the relationship between equity and liabilities. Higher ratio indicates better results and less risk. Islamic banks used more equity and rely less on the long-term debts. Might be this is one of the major cause of a lower risk in Islamic banking system as it reduces the chances of bankruptcy. Although one thing is common as indicated in chart 4.7 both banking system consistently followed that from 2006 to 2009. However in 2010 Islamic banks equity proportion changed dramatically to 227.37% as compare to 62.54% of conventional banks.
Chart: 4.7 – Total equity/Total liabilities of Islamic and conventional banks from (2006-2010)
Source: Appendix 14 & 15
Average growth in total assets of Islamic Banks and conventional banks
As indicated in chart 4.8 Islamic banks average growth in total asset were very consistent throughout from 2006 to 2010 however conventional banks total assets growth had a dramatic change during 2009 as this growth was -33.97%. It was might be conventional banks started releasing their long-term assets to faster their early collections to improve liquidity positions.
Chart: 4.8 – Average growth in total assets Islamic and conventional banks from (2006-2010)
Source: Appendix 04 & 05
Average growth in operating profit of Islamic and conventional banks
Islamic banks suffer major losses during 2007 mainly due to high growth in 2006 which they failed to keep the same momentum. However conventional banks remain same during 2007 to 2008. After 2008 their profit dramatically increased by 137% as compare to a very little growth of 3.31% in Islamic banks mainly due to new projects and less retention ratio.
Chart: 4.9 – Average growth in operating profits of Islamic and conventional banks from (2006-2010)
Source: Appendix 06 & 0
An overall Z-Score & Yearly Analysis
Conventional Banks performance during 2006 to 2010
Table: 4.4 – Overall Z-Score of conventional banks and Islamic banks (2006-2010)
|
Z-Score achieved by Conventional Banks in GCC Countries |
|||
|
Years |
<1.10 |
1.10-2.60 |
>2.60 |
|
2006 |
40% |
50% |
10% |
|
2007 |
40% |
60% |
0% |
|
2008 |
50% |
50% |
0% |
|
2009 |
20% |
50% |
30% |
|
2010 |
20% |
40% |
60% |
Source: Appendix 03
|
Z-Score achieved by Islamic Banks in GCC Countries |
|||
|
Years |
<1.10 |
1.10-2.60 |
>2.60 |
|
2006 |
10% |
20% |
70% |
|
2007 |
0% |
60% |
40% |
|
2008 |
0% |
60% |
40% |
|
2009 |
20% |
40% |
40% |
|
2010 |
10% |
50% |
40% |
Source: Appendix 02
2006
During 2006 Islamic banks performed very well as 70% of the Islamic banks achieved their objectives of shareholders wealth maximisation at a very lowest risk (table4.4). However only 10% of conventional banks were succeeded to do that. Islamic banks had better liquidity position that was three times better than conventional banks. Secondly, Islamic banks were relying more on equity instead of short (Appendix 12, 13, 14 and 15)
2007
Credit crunch started in the mid of 2007. One important point for Islamic banking that none of the Islamic bank were in danger zone or near to bankruptcy during this period. It was mainly due to high growth in total assets around 29.15% (Appendix 04) and high liquidity measures that was almost three time higher than conventional banks. (Appendix 12). However there were 49% conventional banks suffering in danger zone with high chances of bankruptcy. It was mainly due to high portion of long term debts (Appendix 15). However both systems affected adversely against liquidity problems (Appendix 13).
2008
Credit crunch remained for a full year during 2008. Same like previous year none of the Islamic bank was danger zone during 2008, which indicates very good results. However on other hand 50% of the conventional banks were struggling (Appendix 03) and none of the conventional bank was in safe zone. It was mainly due to retention ratio, which decreased to 1.84% from 2.25%. (Appendix 11) however on other side 40% Islamic banks shows excellent performance with higher score mainly due to higher liquidity measures and growth in operating profits. (Appendix 12)
2009
Year 2009 was considered as a recovery period. During 2009 20% Islamic banks moved to danger zone, which indicates that Islamic banks moved to bankruptcy side due to some other reasons but not credit crunch. It was mainly due to lower growth in operating profits of 3.31% as compare to 8.5% of previous year. (Appendix 06). Retention ratio of Islamic banks reached to its lowest level of 1% due to less reinvestment opportunities. It might be due to less investment opportunities for Islamic banks in GCC as Islamic banks cant invest in every project (Appendix 10). Also share capital value of the Islamic banks had decreased by 55.43% (appendix 14). However 30% conventional banks moved to safer zone mainly because of productivity ratio increased to 4.36% as compare to 2.75% of previous year (Appendix 09). Conventional banks retention ratio also went up to 2.32% as compare to 1.84% of 2008 (appendix 11).
2010
This year was a very good for both types of banks as almost 60% of the Islamic banks moved toward highest score and 40% of conventional banks. Islamic banks finds growth in value of equity which increased on its highest peak of 227.3% (appendix 14). There was also high retention ratio reached to .74% (appendix 10). 40% of the conventional banks also moved to safer zone mainly due to high growth in equity values which jumped up by 62.54% as compare to 24.47% of previous year (appendix 15)
Country wise analysis
74
Chart: 4.9 – Average Z-score - UAE Chart: 4.10 – Average Z-score - Bahrain
Source: Appendix 16 Source: Appendix 17
Chart: 4.11 – Average Z-score - Saudi Arabia Chart: 4.12 – Average Z-score - Kuwait
Source: Appendix 18 Source: Appendix 19
Chart: 4.13 – Average Z-score - Qatar
Source: Appendix 20
Country wise analysis
This part of the analysis will focuses on each country’s performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks.
UAE
In UAE Islamic banks performed remain same through 2006 to 2010. Most of the were in grey area as they managed to get middle score. However none of the bank were in danger zone from both categories. Islamic banks achieved their highest score in UAE during 2009, which shows their high progress and growth opportunities. As indicated in chart 4.9 Islamic banks show a very consistent performance. (Appendix 16)
BAHRAIN
In Bahrain there was a clear difference in performance of Islamic banking and conventional banking. In 2006 score of Islamic banks were almost six time higher than conventional banks due to high growth in total assets and operating profits. All Islamic banks performed and achieved highest score (safe zone) throughout 2006 to 2010. However on other side conventional banks were performing under bankruptcy threat from 2006 to 2007. However during credit crisis these banks successfully managed to moved to grey area. During recovery period of 2009 and 2010 conventional banking performance was very fast as they managed to stay in grey area and then achieved highest results during 2010. (Appendix 17)
SAUDI ARABIA
In Saudi Arabia Islamic banks got highest growth opportunities. Al Rajhi Islamic bank is the biggest Islamic bank is the world. In Saudi Arabia Islamic banks achieved better results as compare to conventional banks. But most of them remained same. As Islamic banks made huge investment in many areas and waiting for the returns. So results has not been produced. However Islamic banks never entered in danger zone.
On other hand conventional banks performed very steady but slow. During 2007 z-score went down to 1.735 mainly due to -3.03% growth in operating profits of Al Rajhi Islamic bank. (appendix 06). Islamic banks also managed a very low retention ratio of 1.27% for Al Rajhi, .54% for A Bilad bank (appendix 10). On other hand conventional banks score also went down to 1.115 during 2007. During 2008, Islamic banks shows some improvements and managed to get 1.845 score mainly because of 23.56% growth in total assets of Al Rajhi bank (Appendix 04). In 2009 Islamic banks management to sustain at the same level with same score. During 2010 Islamic banks z score decline due to poor performance of Al Rajhi bank and a decline in operating profits of Al Bilad (appendix 06)
(Appendix 18)
KUWAIT
In Kuwait Islamic banks performance during the credit crisis was better during credit crunch. In 2006 and 2008 Islamic banks were in danger zone. Performance of Islamic banks was better than conventional banks from 2006 to 2009 however from 2009 to 2010 Islamic banks performance was almost similar to conventional banks. In 2006 Islamic banks successfully achieved 2.292 as compare to 1.015 of conventional banks z-score mainly due to outclass performance of Kuwait Finance house (see appendix 19). However during credit crunch this score decline to 1.7775 mainly due to dropped in profits (161.83%) of Burgan Bank. (Appendix 07). Also there was a decline in liquidity measure of Boubyan Bank which dropped down to 6.33% as compare to 17.74% of previous year (appendix 12).
In 2008 Islamic banks shows outclass performance and managed to achieved highest score due to liquidity improvements (appendix 12). However conventional banks were struggling due to failure to achieved target growth in total assets, which decline to .4% from 31.99% (appendix 05).
In 2009Islamic banks were showing poor results as bankruptcy risk was very high however during 2010 there was slight improvement in the score which reached to 2.08 mainly because of 106% growth in operating profits (appendix 06)
QATAR
In Qatar none of the Islamic bank or conventional banks were in danger zone throughout from 2006 to 2010. However Islamic banks were showing better results as they all managed to achieve more than 2.60 of score. However during credit crunch (2007 & 2008) only conventional banks were showing better results mainly because of high growth in total assets (appendix 05).
Questionnaire analysis
Second part of the analysis is based on the data collected from UK customers of the Islamic banking to know their satisfaction level with Islamic banking.
As shown in appendix 21 there were various question asked from different customers of Islamic banking. It has been found out that Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky which scored 1.09[footnoteRef:1]. In our previous chapter analysis we have found out that main cause of the credit crisis during 2008 – 2009 was subprime mortgages which Islamic banking don’t dealt with. There is also a very good potential for Islamic banking for UK as customer satisfaction level is very high (hence a score of 1.09/5 – Appendix 21) as most of the existing customers are refereeing to other people. [1: Lower weighted average score indicates better score as 1 was dedicated for the strong agreed and 5 for strongly disagree]
However there are few challenges which Islamic banking customers are facing is availability of new products. Although Islamic banking is growing very fast and introducing new products every year however most of the customers found that sometime they don’t find all of their related products. Here It score 3.85/5 which is quite high. It might be due to contradiction between Islamic sharia laws and local laws. However there is a lot of developments going on this area due to high growth opportunities for Islamic banking. Most of the customers also finds out that Islamic banking is very expensive and less profitable for them (hence a score of 1.3/5) appendix 21. This is due to not operating at higher level to achieve economies of scales as conventional banking is achieving in UK.
Chart 4.18 – Overall satisfaction with Islamic banking
Overall satisfaction level with Islamic banking in UK is very high as 1.33/5 of score indicates. Which also indicates that recommendation level is very high and this will attract more new customers. However Islamic banks have to work more on few areas like role of sharia board, better customer services and product availability as most of the customers are not clear in this area.
As shown in appendix 22 productivity and role of sharah board got very high standard deviation which details about risk level in these areas so all Islamic banks must work on this to improve these areas.
Descriptive Statistics |
||||||||
|
|
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
N |
|||||
|
Overall experience with Islamic banking |
1.33 |
.479 |
33 |
|||||
|
Product availability |
2.15 |
1.253 |
33 |
|||||
|
Islamic products are more expensive |
1.30 |
.637 |
33 |
|||||
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
1.09 |
.292 |
33 |
|||||
|
Role of Shariah Board |
2.24 |
1.032 |
33 |
|||||
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
2.85 |
.870 |
33 |
|||||
|
Provision of guidance about sharah laws |
1.45 |
.666 |
33 |
|||||
Correlations – Measuring efficiency
|
||||||||
|
|
Overall experience with Islamic banking |
Product availability |
Islamic products are more expensive |
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
Role of Shariah Board |
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
Provision of guidance about sharah laws |
|
|
Pearson Correlation |
Overall experience with Islamic banking |
1.000 |
.017 |
-.137 |
.224 |
-.295 |
-.175 |
-.196 |
|
|
Product availability |
.017 |
1.000 |
-.334 |
.047 |
.067 |
-.036 |
-.123 |
|
|
Islamic products are more expensive |
-.137 |
-.334 |
1.000 |
-.153 |
.075 |
.255 |
.034 |
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
.224 |
.047 |
-.153 |
1.000 |
-.179 |
-.313 |
-.219 |
|
|
Role of Shariah Board |
-.295 |
.067 |
.075 |
-.179 |
1.000 |
.147 |
.335 |
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
-.175 |
-.036 |
.255 |
-.313 |
.147 |
1.000 |
.338 |
|
|
Provision of guidance about sharah laws |
-.196 |
-.123 |
.034 |
-.219 |
.335 |
.338 |
1.000 |
|
Sig. (1-tailed) |
Overall experience with Islamic banking |
. |
.462 |
.224 |
.105 |
.048 |
.165 |
.137 |
|
|
Product availability |
.462 |
. |
.029 |
.398 |
.355 |
.422 |
.248 |
|
|
Islamic products are more expensive |
.224 |
.029 |
. |
.198 |
.339 |
.076 |
.427 |
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
.105 |
.398 |
.198 |
. |
.159 |
.038 |
.110 |
|
|
Role of Shariah Board |
.048 |
.355 |
.339 |
.159 |
. |
.208 |
.028 |
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
.165 |
.422 |
.076 |
.038 |
.208 |
. |
.027 |
|
|
Provision of guidance about sharah laws |
.137 |
.248 |
.427 |
.110 |
.028 |
.027 |
. |
|
N |
Overall experience with Islamic banking |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Product availability |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic products are more expensive |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Role of Shariah Board |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Provision of guidance about sharah laws |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
Overall experience with Islamic banking has been assessed through six independent variables like product availability, product cost, transparency, and role of sharia board, customer services and sharia guidance for customers. As most of the Islamic banking customers are Muslims however most of the customers responded that it not only suitable for Muslims but also for Non-Muslims as it is based on ethics instead of religious.
Coefficientsa
|
||||||
|
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||
|
|
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
|
|
|
|
1 |
(Constant) |
1.579 |
.634 |
|
2.491 |
.019 |
|
|
Product availability |
-.005 |
.076 |
-.013 |
-.064 |
.950 |
|
|
Islamic products are more expensive |
-.065 |
.153 |
-.087 |
-.427 |
.673 |
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
.226 |
.321 |
.138 |
.704 |
.488 |
|
|
Role of Shariah Board |
-.108 |
.092 |
-.232 |
-1.178 |
.250 |
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
-.029 |
.114 |
-.053 |
-.255 |
.801 |
|
|
Provision of guidance about sharia laws |
-.049 |
.150 |
-.069 |
-.329 |
.744 |
|
a. Dependent Variable: Overall experience with Islamic banking |
||||||
|
Descriptive Statistics |
||||||
|
|
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
N |
|||
|
Islamic banking has growth opportunities in UK |
1.09 |
.292 |
33 |
|||
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
2.85 |
.870 |
33 |
|||
|
Islamic banking is only suitable for Muslims |
4.06 |
.348 |
33 |
|||
|
Islamic banking is more profitable |
4.30 |
.585 |
33 |
|||
|
Islamic banking is religious basis |
2.67 |
1.472 |
33 |
|||
|
Development of new products |
3.85 |
.442 |
33 |
|||
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
1.09 |
.292 |
33 |
|
Correlations – Growth opportunities for Islamic banks in UK |
||||||||
|
|
Islamic banking has growth opportunities in UK |
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
Islamic banking is only suitable for Muslims |
Islamic banking is more profitable |
Islamic banking is religious basis |
Development of new products |
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
|
|
Pearson Correlation |
Islamic banking has growth opportunities in UK |
1.000 |
-.190 |
-.056 |
.017 |
-.145 |
.110 |
-.100 |
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
-.190 |
1.000 |
-.175 |
.032 |
.496 |
-.305 |
-.313 |
|
|
Islamic banking is only suitable for Muslims |
-.056 |
-.175 |
1.000 |
-.093 |
-.264 |
.265 |
.559 |
|
|
Islamic banking is more profitable |
.017 |
.032 |
-.093 |
1.000 |
.193 |
-.059 |
.017 |
|
|
Islamic banking is religious basis |
-.145 |
.496 |
-.264 |
.193 |
1.000 |
.016 |
-.145 |
|
|
Development of new products |
.110 |
-.305 |
.265 |
-.059 |
.016 |
1.000 |
.110 |
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
-.100 |
-.313 |
.559 |
.017 |
-.145 |
.110 |
1.000 |
|
Sig. (1-tailed) |
Islamic banking has growth opportunities in UK |
. |
.145 |
.379 |
.463 |
.210 |
.271 |
.290 |
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
.145 |
. |
.165 |
.431 |
.002 |
.042 |
.038 |
|
|
Islamic banking is only suitable for Muslims |
.379 |
.165 |
. |
.304 |
.069 |
.068 |
.000 |
|
|
Islamic banking is more profitable |
.463 |
.431 |
.304 |
. |
.140 |
.373 |
.463 |
|
|
Islamic banking is religious basis |
.210 |
.002 |
.069 |
.140 |
. |
.465 |
.210 |
|
|
Development of new products |
.271 |
.042 |
.068 |
.373 |
.465 |
. |
.271 |
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
.290 |
.038 |
.000 |
.463 |
.210 |
.271 |
. |
|
N |
Islamic banking has growth opportunities in UK |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic banking is only suitable for Muslims |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic banking is more profitable |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic banking is religious basis |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Development of new products |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter - 06
Conclusion
Islamic banking is a very fastest growing segment which challenge conventional banking system. There is a great potential in this market, more consistency and less risk. Results shows that Islamic banking system is more secure than conventional system. Main aim of this report to bridge the gap between conventional banking and Islamic banking.
As we have seen conventional banking system is completely destroyed by the credit crisis and there is a need of fundamental changes. Although there are lot of improvements are going on but most of them are for the time being but not the fundamentals.
This research found that Islamic banking system has better characteristics than conventional banking system. Research found that Islamic banking understand people’s nature and assess it in more detailed. Now in UK Financial services Authority and other conventional banks needs to think about Islamic banking system beyond the religious point of view. The fundamental part of Islamic banking system, which is sharing risk and rewards and based on real value of asset creates the difference.
Conventional banking system is mainly rely on long term debts however Islamic banks always based on real assets. We find out that during the credit crisis assets growth was stronger which took Islamic banks away from bankruptcy. Also Islamic banks had additional buffer these activities, which tend to reduce their contribution bubbles. However, as conventional banks are based on debt so during the crisis their gearing ratio went up which made them risky. There are also flows in rules for conventional banks to manipulate their accounts. For example collateral debt obligation. There are also so many other complex derivatives where there are very high rates of return but later on they collapse because they were very risky for example toxic assets. So banks show large amount of such assets but in reality worth nothing. However on other side Islamic banks for not allowed to invest into such securities.
However there are few other points to consider to make a decision. Biggest challenge for an Islamic bank to operate at higher level is to have its own Shariah board in every country where they operate. So these sharia scholars decided where to invest the money. There is also a need to more transparency in international accounting and auditing standards. However AAOIFI (Accounting and auditing organisation for Islamic financial institute) is working closely on this issue.
Research survey conducted in UK also indicates that Islamic banks are struggling in term of provision of new products, which fulfil customer’s need and requirements. Because of not operating at a large level banks usually are unable to achieve economies of scales. So most of the customer finds it a bit expensive.
There is also a lack of qualified people and infrastructure. So existing Islamic banks must provide a very level customer services especially about the Islamic banking products.
Overall Islamic banking characteristics are much better than conventional banking because it is more according to the demand of the society based on the Shariah laws. Secondly conventional banking put too much burden on their customer, as he will suffer all loses and could also get a gain. However Islamic banking is based on risk sharing and no interest in any case.
Recommendation
Although there are lot of challenges which Islamic banking is currently facing. These are the few recommendation to overcome those challenges.
· Although there is a problem in harmonization on accounting and audit standards. This can be resolved through by collaboration of UK Islamic banks and AAIOFI
· Banks provide both types of services Islamic banking services and conventional banking services in UK there must have a clear separation of both segments and money generated from one arm should not be invested or used in the other arms
· Staff training and product development opportunities can be improved through opening new branches and setting up a central office for staff training and research centre
· Currently Islamic banks in UK are struggling to find qualified Islamic scholars. Two banks got three scholars and one got four scholars. That’s why customer satisfaction with product development is not very high. So if lenders advertise about Islamic mortgages this may lead to growth in demand. Although finding new scholars are difficult but these banks for sponsor qualified people for further education in top rank UK universities to achieve such qualifications that can assist her or him to work on shariah board.
· This research also identified that most of the respondent agreed that it is not only suitable for Muslim people but also for non Muslims. So banks should also target non Muslim people. Banks should also advertise more on Islamic TV channels to increase the demand.
· Islamic banks respondents can contacts Imams of local mosques and meet the people and give a free advise on every Friday.
· To increase demand Islamic banks should not only work on price strategy but also work on fundamental components product development, product promotion and delivery channels.
Limitation of study
All of the respondents filled the questionnaires were Muslims. However banks confirmed that they have non-Muslim customers as well. This could limit the research scope we non-Muslim customer opinion will not be included.
In this project some banks were quite large enough to affect the average results like Al Rajhi Islamic banks so a little can bring a huge impact on average figures and could have an impact on analysis
Some banks were quite small for others that a huge change in their results brings small impacts. All amounts and figures has been taken in the local currency of that particular bank so might be a true comparison can be affected as some currencies will be stronger than others.
In this research we relied on Altman Z-score which has its own limitations as it is based on past data so might be we cant rely on it for future purposes
Implication for further research
After this research I have identify follower further research areas similar to this project
Behaviour of non-Muslim towards Islamic banking in UK
Role of Islamic bonds (Skuk) in linking with Islamic mortgage market
Growth opportunities conventional banks in UK
Toxic assets and role of Islamic finance
Standardisation in Islamic banking
A comparative analysis of Islamic accounting standards and conventional accounting standards (IAS)
A critical evaluation of root causes of subprime mortgages in UK. A solution through Islamic banking
References
Alam, N (2004). “Islamic finance – Issues and opportunities, EIRIS.
Altman, E.I, Danovi, A and Falini, A(2010). “Z-SCORE MODELS’ APPLICATION TO ITALIAN COMPANIES SUBJECT TO EXTRAORDINARY ADMINISTRATION.” [Online]. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~ealtman/BOZZA%20ARTICOLO%2017.pdf. [Accessed on 03.02.2014]
Al-Jarhi, A.I (2001). “Islamic banking; answers to some frequently asked questions. Islamic development bank Islamic research and training institute.
Amadeo, K (2007). “What Caused the Subprime Mortgage Crisis?” http://useconomy.about.com/od/criticalssues/tp/Subprime-Mortgage-Crisis-Cause.htm [accessed on 25.01. 2014]
Barnett, V(1991). “Sample survey principles and method, London, Edward Arnold.
Beck et al. (2010). “Islamic vs. Conventional Banking Business Model, Efficiency and Stability.” Oct 2010. The World Bank research paper Working Paper 5446.
Collis, J. Hussey, R. (2003) Business Research, 2ed edition: Palgrave Macmillan
Dar, H.A. & Presley, J.R. (2000), ‘Lack of Profit Loss Sharing in Islamic
Banking: Management and Control Imbalance’, Loughborough University.
Department of Economics.
Davidson’s (2008). “Don't Blame CDOs for the Subprime Crisis.” published: February 27, 2008 in [email protected]. Carey. http://knowledge.wpcarey.asu.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1562 [accessed on 27 .01 2014]
Din, S.T.E (2004). Accounting standards of Islamic financial institutions: analysis of balance sheet structure. Markfield institute higher education.
Ernst & Young Report (2012). “The World Islamic Banking Competitiveness
Repot”. [Online] http://emergingmarkets.ey.com/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/03/The-World-Islamic-Banking-Competitiveness-Report.pdf [accessed on 04.02.2014]
Foddy, W (1994). “Constructive questions for interviews and questionnaires”. Cambridge, Cambridge university press.
Fox, J and Long, J.S (1990). “Modern methods of data analysis, Newbury Park, CA, sage.
Gill, J and Johnson, P. (1997). “Research methods for managers”. (2nd edition), London, Paul chapman.
Hasan, M. and Dridi, J. (2010). “The Effects of the Global Crisis on Islamic and
Conventional Banks: A Comparative Study.” IMF Working Paper 10/201
Henry, G.T(1990). “Practical sampling”. Newbury Park, CA, Sage.
Hull, L. (2002). Foreign-Owned Banks: Implications for New Zealand's Financial. Stability. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Discussion Paper Series , Wellington.
Hussy, J and Hussy, R (1997). “ Business research; a practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students, Basingstoke, Macmillan Business.
IFSB et al (2010). “Islamic finance and global financial stability” April 2010. [online]. http://www.ifsb.org/docs/IFSB-IRTI-IDB2010.pdf. [accessed on 21.01.2014]
Ilias, S. (2010, November). Islamic Finance: Overview and Policy Concerns.
Congressional Research Service , 1-12.
Kayed, R., & Hassan, M. (2009). The Global Financial Crisis, Risk Management and Social Justice in Islamic Finance. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance , 1 (1), 33-58.
Khan. J.A (2008). “Research methodology.” Published by S.B. Nangia, New Delhi, India.
Khan, M. (1986). Islamic Interest-Free Banking. Staff Papers - International Monetary Fund , 33 (1), 1-27.
Loundy, D. (2008). Islamic finance and the U.S. sub-prime mortgage mess:
Lessons to be learned. Retrieved February 8, 2012, from Bahrin Business's site:[online]ww.usbahrainbusiness.org/view/images/uploaded/Loundy_Lessons_Learned.pdf. [accessed on 02.11.2013]
Mirakhor, A., & Krichene, N. (2009). Recent Crisis: Lessons for Islamic Finance. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance , 5 (1), 9-58.
Miller, J.N (2011). “Questionnaires, from the Handbook for economics lecturers.” Newlands, D.(ed.) economics Network, HEA.
Mishkin, F. S. (1997). The Causes and Propagation of Financial Instability: Lessons for Policymakers. (pp. 55-96). Kansas: Federal Reserve Bank
Mustafa, W (2013). The emergence of Islamic banking: development, trends, and challenges. IOSR journal of business and management PP67-71
ONS, Census, (2011), www.ons.gov.uk › Home › Publications
Ozturk, I. (2008, November 23). Global financial crisis highlights benefits of Islamic finance. Todays Zaman
Peavler, R (2010). “Toxic Assets: What They Are and How They Brought Down the U.S. Economy.”: about.com guide. http://bizfinance.about.com/od/currentevents/a/Recession.htm [16.02. 2014].
Parashar, S., & Venkatesh, J. (2010). How did Islamic banks do during global
financial crisis? Banks and Bank system , 4, 54-62.
Rahman, S (2009). “ Islamic banks are less risky” May 07: The Daily Star. [online]Source:http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=87068 [accessed on 02.02.2014]
Rahman. N. U (2012). “Attitudes of Muslims towards Islamic banking and finance in North West of England; A socio-economic perspective.” Durham centre for Islamic economics and Finance. Published in April 2012. [online]. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/6394/1/Final_Thesis.pdf. [accessed on 20.02.2014]
Ryan, B (2009) “toxic assets” student accountant articles ACCA, website http://www.accaglobal.com/documents/toxic_assets.pdf [accessed on 14.02.2014]
Saunders, M, Lewis, P, Thornhill, A (2000). “Research methods for business studies.” Second edition, Pearson education limited
Siddiqui, M. (2008). Current financial crisis and Islamic economics. Retrieved February 8, 2012, from Dr. Mohammad Nejatullah Siddiqi's site: [online]http://www.siddiqi.com/mns/. [Accessed on 09.02.2014]
Smith, H (1975). “Strategies of social research; the methodological imagination”. Englewood cliffs, NJ, prentice-hall.
Stiglitz, J. (2003). Dealing with Debt: How to Reform the Global Financial System. Harvard International Review, Spring , 54-59.
Trabelsi, M. (2011). The Impact of the Financial Crisis on the Global Economy:Can Islamic Financial System help? The Journal of Risk Finance , 12 (1), 15-25
Wade, A (2009)”crossing over to Islamic banking”. Times online. March 12, 2009. Available from: http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article5889624.ece. (Accessed on 25.01.2014]
WALTERS, P. (2008)THE COLLAPSE OF THE US SUB-PRIME MORTGAGE MARKET. JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF CHARTED ACCOUNTANTS.
Wahlen, J.M, Stickney, C.P, Bradshaw, B.M. (2011). “ Financial reporting, financial statement analysis and valuation; A strategic perspective.” 7th edition. South-western, Cengage learning.
Wilson, R. (2007). The West Should promote Islamic Banking. Islamica Magazine.
Appendix
Appendix 1.A – Z core of Islamic and conventional banks
Appendix 1 – Z score of Islamic banks
Appendix 1.1 – Z score of Conventional banks
Appendix 02 – Division of Islamic banks into each area
Appendix 03 – Division of Conventional banks into each area
Appendix – 04 – Growth in Total assets of Islamic banks
Appendix – 05 – Growth in Total assets of conventional banks
Appendix 06 – Growth in operating profits of Islamic banks
Appendix 07 – Growth in operating profits of Islamic banks
Variance analysis
Appendix 08 - Productivity of the Banks assets: EBIT/Total assets - Islamic banks
Appendix 09 - Productivity of the Banks assets: EBIT/Total assets - Conventional banks
Appendix – 10 – Retention ratio: Retained earning/Total assets – Islamic banks
Appendix – 11 – Retention ratio: Retained earning/Total assets – Conventional banks
Appendix – 12 – Liquidity measures – Working capital/Total assets – Islamic banks
Appendix – 13 – Liquidity measures – Working capital/Total assets – Conventional banks
Appendix – 14 – Total equity/Total liabilities – Islamic banks
Appendix – 15 – Total equity/Total liabilities – Conventional banks
Appendix – 16 & 17 – Country wise analysis – UAE and Bahrain
Appendix – 18 & 19 – Country wise analysis – Saudi Arabia & Kuwait
Appendix – 20 – Country wise analysis – Qatar
|
APPENDIX 20 |
QATAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.NO. |
BANK NAME |
TYPE |
COUNTRY |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
|
17 |
Qatar International Islamic Bank |
ISLAMIC BANK |
QTR |
5.989 |
5.023 |
4.853 |
6.674 |
6.689 |
|
18 |
Al Ahli Bank of Qatar |
ISLAMIC BANK |
QTR |
6.727 |
1.343 |
1.536 |
1.201 |
1.587 |
|
Average |
|
|
|
6.358 |
3.183 |
3.1945 |
3.9375 |
4.138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.NO. |
BANK NAME |
TYPE |
COUNTRY |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
|
19 |
Doha Bank |
CONVENTIONAL BANK |
QTR |
1.394 |
1.036 |
1.595 |
5.172 |
1.587 |
|
20 |
Commercial Bank of Qatar |
CONVENTIONAL BANK |
QTR |
2.719 |
2.545 |
2.341 |
3.309 |
3.383 |
|
Average |
|
|
|
2.0565 |
1.7905 |
1.968 |
4.2405 |
2.485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendix – 21 – Frequencies of answering questions
|
Statistics |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Overall experience and recommendation |
Product availability |
Islamic products are more expensive |
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
Role of Sharia Board |
Development of new products |
Islamic banking is religious basis |
Islamic banking is more profitable |
Satisfaction with level of services |
Islamic banking is only suitable for Muslims |
Provision of guidance about sharah laws |
Islamic banking has growth opportunities in UK |
All Islamic banks follow same principles |
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
Overall experience with Islamic banking |
|
|
N |
Valid |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Missing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Mean |
1.24 |
2.15 |
1.30 |
1.09 |
2.24 |
3.85 |
2.67 |
4.30 |
1.12 |
4.06 |
1.45 |
1.09 |
2.76 |
2.85 |
1.33 |
Appendix 22 - Descriptive Statistics
|
|||
|
|
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
N |
|
Overall experience with Islamic banking |
1.33 |
.479 |
33 |
|
Product availability |
2.15 |
1.253 |
33 |
|
Islamic products are more expensive |
1.30 |
.637 |
33 |
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
1.09 |
.292 |
33 |
|
Role of Shariah Board |
2.24 |
1.032 |
33 |
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
2.85 |
.870 |
33 |
|
Provision of guidance about sharah laws |
1.45 |
.666 |
33 |
Appendix – 23 – Correlations – Measuring efficiency
|
||||||||
|
|
Overall experience with Islamic banking |
Product availability |
Islamic products are more expensive |
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
Role of Shariah Board |
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
Provision of guidance about sharah laws |
|
|
Pearson Correlation |
Overall experience with Islamic banking |
1.000 |
.017 |
-.137 |
.224 |
-.295 |
-.175 |
-.196 |
|
|
Product availability |
.017 |
1.000 |
-.334 |
.047 |
.067 |
-.036 |
-.123 |
|
|
Islamic products are more expensive |
-.137 |
-.334 |
1.000 |
-.153 |
.075 |
.255 |
.034 |
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
.224 |
.047 |
-.153 |
1.000 |
-.179 |
-.313 |
-.219 |
|
|
Role of Shariah Board |
-.295 |
.067 |
.075 |
-.179 |
1.000 |
.147 |
.335 |
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
-.175 |
-.036 |
.255 |
-.313 |
.147 |
1.000 |
.338 |
|
|
Provision of guidance about sharah laws |
-.196 |
-.123 |
.034 |
-.219 |
.335 |
.338 |
1.000 |
|
Sig. (1-tailed) |
Overall experience with Islamic banking |
. |
.462 |
.224 |
.105 |
.048 |
.165 |
.137 |
|
|
Product availability |
.462 |
. |
.029 |
.398 |
.355 |
.422 |
.248 |
|
|
Islamic products are more expensive |
.224 |
.029 |
. |
.198 |
.339 |
.076 |
.427 |
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
.105 |
.398 |
.198 |
. |
.159 |
.038 |
.110 |
|
|
Role of Shariah Board |
.048 |
.355 |
.339 |
.159 |
. |
.208 |
.028 |
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
.165 |
.422 |
.076 |
.038 |
.208 |
. |
.027 |
|
|
Provision of guidance about sharah laws |
.137 |
.248 |
.427 |
.110 |
.028 |
.027 |
. |
|
N |
Overall experience with Islamic banking |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Product availability |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic products are more expensive |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Role of Shariah Board |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Provision of guidance about sharah laws |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
Appendix - 24 - Variables Entered/Removeda |
||||||
|
Model |
Variables Entered |
Variables Removed |
Method |
|||
|
1 |
Provision of guidance about sharah laws, Islamic products are more expensive, Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky, Product availability, Role of Shariah Board, Islamic banks provide better customer servicesb |
. |
Enter |
|||
|
a. Dependent Variable: Overall experience with Islamic banking |
||||||
|
b. All requested variables entered. |
||||||
|
Appendix – 25 - Model Summary |
||||||
|
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. Error of the Estimate |
||
|
1 |
.366a |
.134 |
-.066 |
.494 |
||
|
a. Predictors: (Constant), Provision of guidance about sharah laws, Islamic products are more expensive, Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky, Product availability, Role of Shariah Board, Islamic banks provide better customer services |
||||||
Appendix 26 - ANOVAa |
||||||
|
Model |
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
|
1 |
Regression |
.981 |
6 |
.164 |
.669 |
.675b |
|
|
Residual |
6.352 |
26 |
.244 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
7.333 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: Overall experience with Islamic banking |
||||||
|
b. Predictors: (Constant), Provision of guidance about sharah laws, Islamic products are more expensive, Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky, Product availability, Role of Shariah Board, Islamic banks provide better customer services |
|
Coefficientsa
|
||||||||
|
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||||
|
|
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
|
|
|||
|
1 |
(Constant) |
1.579 |
.634 |
|
2.491 |
.019 |
||
|
|
Product availability |
-.005 |
.076 |
-.013 |
-.064 |
.950 |
||
|
|
Islamic products are more expensive |
-.065 |
.153 |
-.087 |
-.427 |
.673 |
||
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
.226 |
.321 |
.138 |
.704 |
.488 |
||
|
|
Role of Shariah Board |
-.108 |
.092 |
-.232 |
-1.178 |
.250 |
||
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
-.029 |
.114 |
-.053 |
-.255 |
.801 |
||
|
|
Provision of guidance about shariah laws |
-.049 |
.150 |
-.069 |
-.329 |
.744 |
||
|
a. Dependent Variable: Overall experience with Islamic banking |
||||||||
|
Descriptive Statistics
|
||||||||
|
|
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
N |
|||||
|
Islamic banking has growth opportunities in UK |
1.09 |
.292 |
33 |
|||||
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
2.85 |
.870 |
33 |
|||||
|
Islamic banking is only suitable for Muslims |
4.06 |
.348 |
33 |
|||||
|
Islamic banking is more profitable |
4.30 |
.585 |
33 |
|||||
|
Islamic banking is religious basis |
2.67 |
1.472 |
33 |
|||||
|
Development of new products |
3.85 |
.442 |
33 |
|||||
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
1.09 |
.292 |
33 |
|||||
|
Appendix – 27 – Correlations – Growth opportunities for Islamic banks in UK |
||||||||
|
|
Islamic banking has growth opportunities in UK |
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
Islamic banking is only suitable for Muslims |
Islamic banking is more profitable |
Islamic banking is religious basis |
Development of new products |
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
|
|
Pearson Correlation |
Islamic banking has growth opportunities in UK |
1.000 |
-.190 |
-.056 |
.017 |
-.145 |
.110 |
-.100 |
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
-.190 |
1.000 |
-.175 |
.032 |
.496 |
-.305 |
-.313 |
|
|
Islamic banking is only suitable for Muslims |
-.056 |
-.175 |
1.000 |
-.093 |
-.264 |
.265 |
.559 |
|
|
Islamic banking is more profitable |
.017 |
.032 |
-.093 |
1.000 |
.193 |
-.059 |
.017 |
|
|
Islamic banking is religious basis |
-.145 |
.496 |
-.264 |
.193 |
1.000 |
.016 |
-.145 |
|
|
Development of new products |
.110 |
-.305 |
.265 |
-.059 |
.016 |
1.000 |
.110 |
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
-.100 |
-.313 |
.559 |
.017 |
-.145 |
.110 |
1.000 |
|
Sig. (1-tailed) |
Islamic banking has growth opportunities in UK |
. |
.145 |
.379 |
.463 |
.210 |
.271 |
.290 |
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
.145 |
. |
.165 |
.431 |
.002 |
.042 |
.038 |
|
|
Islamic banking is only suitable for Muslims |
.379 |
.165 |
. |
.304 |
.069 |
.068 |
.000 |
|
|
Islamic banking is more profitable |
.463 |
.431 |
.304 |
. |
.140 |
.373 |
.463 |
|
|
Islamic banking is religious basis |
.210 |
.002 |
.069 |
.140 |
. |
.465 |
.210 |
|
|
Development of new products |
.271 |
.042 |
.068 |
.373 |
.465 |
. |
.271 |
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
.290 |
.038 |
.000 |
.463 |
.210 |
.271 |
. |
|
N |
Islamic banking has growth opportunities in UK |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic banking is only suitable for Muslims |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic banking is more profitable |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic banking is religious basis |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Development of new products |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Model Summary |
||||||
|
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. Error of the Estimate |
||
|
1 |
.276a |
.076 |
-.137 |
.311 |
||
|
a. Predictors: (Constant), Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky, Islamic banking is more profitable, Development of new products, Islamic banking is religious basis, Islamic banks provide better customer services, Islamic banking is only suitable for Muslims |
||||||
|
ANOVAa |
||||||
|
Model |
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
|
1 |
Regression |
.208 |
6 |
.035 |
.357 |
.899b |
|
|
Residual |
2.520 |
26 |
.097 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
2.727 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: Islamic banking has growth opportunities in UK |
||||||
|
b. Predictors: (Constant), Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky, Islamic banking is more profitable, Development of new products, Islamic banking is religious basis, Islamic banks provide better customer services, Islamic banking is only suitable for Muslims |
||||||
|
Coefficientsa |
||||||
|
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||
|
|
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
|
|
|
|
1 |
(Constant) |
1.301 |
.956 |
|
1.361 |
.185 |
|
|
Islamic banks provide better customer services |
-.055 |
.083 |
-.164 |
-.660 |
.515 |
|
|
Islamic banking is only suitable for Muslims |
-.042 |
.209 |
-.050 |
-.201 |
.842 |
|
|
Islamic banking is more profitable |
.023 |
.097 |
.046 |
.239 |
.813 |
|
|
Islamic banking is religious basis |
-.022 |
.047 |
-.110 |
-.459 |
.650 |
|
|
Development of new products |
.062 |
.142 |
.094 |
.440 |
.664 |
|
|
Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky |
-.150 |
.242 |
-.150 |
-.621 |
.540 |
|
a. Dependent Variable: Islamic banking has growth opportunities in UK |
Islamic Banks - Z-score
< 1.10 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 1.10-2.60 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.2 0.600000000000001 0.600000000000001 0.4 0.5 > 2.60 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.700000000000001 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4Conventional Banks - Z-score
< 1.10 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.2 1.10-2.60 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.5 0.600000000000001 0.5 0.5 0.4 > 2.60 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.600000000000001Average Z-Score of Islamic & Conventional Banks
Islamic Banks Average Z-Score 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 3.890899999999997 3.090099999999999 3.387099999999999 3.1517 2.92 Conventional Banks Average Z-Score 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 1.3713 1.245899999999995 1.429549999999997 1.99361 2.5131Average Z-Score
WORKING CAPITAL/TOTAL ASSETS RATIO
WORKING CAPITAL/TOTAL ASSETS RATIOS IN ISLAMIC BANKS 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.459466441728893 0.363425233579042 0.403215517715545 0.367024716474187 0.355070571100617 WORKING CAPITAL/TOTAL ASSETS GROWTH IN CONVENTIONAL BANKS 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.124298325196264 0.127106301088952 0.145906062672911 0.158723649438383 0.222679864573291RETAINED EARNINGS/TOTAL ASSETS RATIO
RETENTION RATIO (RETAINED EARNINGS/TOTAL ASSETS) OF ISLAMIC BANKS 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.0154699708336986 0.0137245068321228 0.0100170386627395 0.00196027864790692 0.00742732376963672 RETENTIONAL RATIO (RETAINED EARNINGS/TOTAL ASSETS) OF CONVENTIONAL BANKS 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.0233654613295858 0.022458274345602 0.0184106969810498 0.0231975662404408 0.026966741693024EBIT/TOTAL ASSETS RATIO
EBIT/TOTAL ASSETS OF ISLAMIC BANKS 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.0531572733727748 0.0374693144073176 0.0342182279947123 0.0341218231845079 0.0273076689415238 EBIT/TOTAL ASSETS OF CONVENTIONAL BANKS 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.0401350879611429 0.0328053052476633 0.0274683813604209 0.0435758253105048 0.0311528409790128Total Equity/Total Liabilities
TOTAL EQUITY/TOTAL LIABILITY RATIO OF ISLAMIC BANKS 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.996257360075218 0.840559249142048 0.861492504668828 0.554319639591774 2.27367381273439 TOTAL EQUITY/TOTAL LIABILITIES RATIO OF CONVENTIONAL BANKS 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.379043007571632 0.191724686283579 0.209606191939671 0.244665351364224 0.625375320428704Average Growth in Total Assets
Growth in Total Assets (Islamic Banking) 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.291471892941121 0.171743876446185 0.161600429085618 0.100138019062159 Growth in Total Assets (Conventional Banking) 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 0.26637637999493 0.181870510962923 -0.339677347365566 0.0783648711100614Average Growth in Operating Profit
Growth in Operating Profit (Islamic Banking) 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 -0.959679977963278 0.0850440618162547 0.0330872808736184 -0.559279778876579 Growth In Operating Profit (Conventional Profit) 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 -0.00939142490147337 -0.0567650075522208 1.369832191469206 0.0263869919043626Average Z-Score Analysis
Average Z-Score of Islamic Banks in UAE 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 1.8745 1.81 1.881 2.025 1.891 Average Z-Score of conventional Banks in UAE 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 1.524999999999998 1.314999999999998 1.955 2.332999999999997 1.782999999999999Average Z-Score Analysis
Average Z-Score of Islamic Banks in Bahrain 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 6.7 6.945 7.274999999999999 7.205 5.359 Average Z-Score of conventional Banks in Bahrain 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 1.03 0.789 1.30475 1.46 5.133999999999999Average Z-Score Analysis
Average Z-score of Islamic Banks in KSA 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 2.23 1.734999999999999 1.845 1.875 1.3745 Average Z-Score of Conventional Banks in KSA 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 1.23 1.115 1.115 1.1 1.083499999999999Average Z-Score Analysis
Average Z-Score of Islamic Banks in Kuwaiat 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 2.292 1.777499999999999 2.74 0.716000000000001 1.837499999999999 Average Z-Score of Conventional Banks in Kuwait 2006 .0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 1.014999999999999 1.22 0.805 0.83455 2.08Average Z-Score Analysis
Average Z-Score of Islamic Banks in Qatar 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 6.358 3.183 3.1945 3.9375 4.137999999999995 Average Z-Score of Conventional Banks in Qatar 2006.0 2007.0 2008.0 2009.0 2010.0 2.056499999999997 1.7905 1.968000000000001 4.2405 2.485 Overall experience and recommendation Product availability Islamic products are more expensive Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky Role of Shariah Board Development of new products Islamic banking is religious basis Islamic banking is more profitable Satisfaction with level of services Islamic banking is only suitable for muslims Provision of guidance about sharah laws Islamic banking has growth oppertunities in UK All Islamic banks follow same principles Islamic banks provide better customer services Overall experience with Islamic banking 1.24 2.15 1.3 1.09 2.24 3.85 2.67 4.3 1.12 4.06 1.45 1.09 2.76 2.85 1.33 Overall experience and recommendation Product availability Islamic products are more expensive Islamic mortgages are more transparent and less risky Role of Shariah Board Development of new products Islamic banking is religious basis Islamic banking is more profitable Satisfaction with level of services Islamic banking is only suitable for muslims Provision of guidance about sharah laws Islamic banking has growth oppertunities in UK All Islamic banks follow same principles Islamic banks provide better customer services Overall experience with Islamic banking 1.24 2.15 1.3 1.09 2.24 3.85 2.67 4.3 1.12 4.06 1.45 1.09 2.76 2.85 1.33