dissertation proposal
Rust99
DISSEM-Midtermtaskbriefandrubrics.docxDISSEM Dissertation Seminar Midterm Assessment Task brief & rubrics
Task
This assignment consists of the definition of a research project proposal in its initial steps. It must include the definition of a research area, a research aim and a research question/hypothesis.
You must upload the written assignment in a word document (using the Dissertation Proposal template) via Turn-it-in. Save your document with the filename: MIDTERM_xxxxxxx (where xxxxxxx is your last name).
Two parts (I & II): (Each part is 50% of the assignment)
I. Development of a research idea:
You must construct a research area, in a single sentence, with a set of selected field and subfields. The research area should be enough specific to define a clear research framework. A research aim must be explained, defining an objective proposal.
· Research Area / Fields / Subfields
· Research Aim
II. Development of a research question/hypothesis:
You must define a complex research question, that covers all relevant aspects of the research idea (the research question can not be a dual answer question). Two hypotheses must be defined according to the research idea and question.
· Research Question
· Hypotheses
Formalities
· Wordcount: 300 min - 800 max.
· Font: Arial 12 pt.
· Text alignment: Justified
Submission: June 21st, 2020. 23:59 CEST.
Weight: This task is 40% of your total grade for this subject.
It assesses the following learning outcome:
· Demonstrate thorough understanding of the terminology of academic research and writing, defining the initial steps of a research project proposal.
RUBRICS
|
Written answers |
Excellent 90-100% |
Good 80-89% |
Fair 70-79% |
Marginal Fail 60-69% |
Fail <60% |
|
Knowledge &Understanding (40%) |
Student demonstrates thorough understanding of content.
|
Student demonstrates considerable understanding of content.
|
Student demonstrates some understanding of content.
|
Student demonstrates limited understanding of content.
|
Student demonstrates no understanding of content.
|
|
Application (40%) |
Applies knowledge and skills in familiar contexts with a high degree of effectiveness, providing relevant contents that support points. |
Applies knowledge and skills in familiar contexts with considerable effectiveness, providing some relevant contents that make a good attempt at supporting points. |
Applies knowledge and skills in familiar contexts with some effectiveness, providing contents although some may lack relevance or provide limited support. |
Applies knowledge and skills in familiar contexts with limited effectiveness, few/ irrelevant contents provided.
|
No application of possible knowledge or skills. No contents provided.
|
|
Communication (20%) |
Uses conventions, vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline with a high degree of effectiveness.
|
Uses conventions, vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline with considerable effectiveness. |
Uses conventions, vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline with some effectiveness.
|
Uses conventions, vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline with limited effectiveness.
|
Lack of use of conventions, vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline.
|
