Discussion #4 Theory
ashambcast
discussionrubric2.5-1.docxCriteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Writing
|
4.0 to 3.0 pts Excellent Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. |
3.0 to >2.0 pts Proficient Written responses are largely free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. |
2.0 to 1.0 pts Limited Written responses include some grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors that distract the reader. |
0.0 pts Poor Written responses contain numerous grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome,
Demonstration of Knowledge and Critical Analysis of Assigned Readings
|
4.0 to >3.0 pts Excellent Initial discussion post displays an excellent understanding of the required readings and concepts including correct use of terminology. Posting integrates an outside resource, or relevant research, or specific real-life application (work experience, prior coursework, etc.) to support important points. |
3.0 to 2.0 pts Proficient Discussion post displays an understanding of the required readings and concepts including correct use of terminology. |
2.0 to >1.0 pts Limited Discussion postings repeat and summarize basic information, but do not link readings, related outside references, relevant research or specific real-life application. |
0.0 pts Poor Discussion postings show little or no evidence that readings were completed. Postings are personal opinions, or superficial responses such as "I agree" or "Great idea," without supporting statements from the readings, outside resources, relevant research, or specific real-life application. |
This criterion is linked to demonstration of knowledge of appropriate APA format. Uses references. Responds to at least 2 students.
|
2.0 |
2.0 pts to 0
|
10 points
