DISCUSSION POST 1
AASP 201 Discussion Rubric
|
Criteria |
3 points |
2 points |
1 point |
0 points |
|
Answered question by the deadline with required 250-word minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
Cited required readings at least 3 times using the appropriate citation style method including footnotes |
|
|
|
|
|
Included no factual errors or misreading of the course materials |
|
|
|
|
|
Used quotations only for effect and comprised less than 20% of the post |
|
|
|
|
|
Included an explicit thesis statement |
|
|
|
|
|
Explained main points from the readings cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Provided 3 detailed examples to support his/her answer |
|
|
|
|
|
Provided 3 insights that furthered knowledge of the discussion topic |
|
|
|
|
|
Communicated the post clearly with good paragraph organization and no grammatical or spelling errors |
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly described and expressed his/her own conclusions |
|
|
|
|
Two Peer Responses – 10 points each weekly response, 5 criteria worth 2 points each:
|
Criteria |
2 points |
1 point |
0 points |
|
Completed peer response to a different Initial Post by the deadline with required 100-word minimum |
|
|
|
|
Communicated peer response clearly with good paragraph organization and no grammatical or spelling errors |
|
|
|
|
Accurately represented the student’s point of view |
|
|
|
|
Included no factual errors or misreading of the course materials |
|
|
|
|
Provided comments and questions that furthered discussion of the topic |
|
|
|