State Farm: Dangerous Intersections Discussion

Criteria Ratings Points

Content - Part I - Initial Post

9 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

Author responded to all case study questions by posted deadlines. Insightful throughout. Completely developed all relevant information. Critical issues and key areas that supported each question were clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

Author responded to all case study questions by posted deadlines. Specific, solid. Less carefully developed. Some insights. Critical issues and key areas that supported each question were partially identified, analyzed, and supported.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Author responded to at least 4 questions by posted deadlines. Vague, obvious, underdeveloped, or too broad. One or more main issues not identified. Limited evidence of critical thinking. Critical issues and key areas that supported each question were not clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.

0 pts

Not Present

9 pts

Content - Part I - Direct Application of Scholarly Research & Integration of Biblical Principles

9 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

Author accurately applied 5 or more scholarly (peer reviewed) sources to the discussion. Author accurately applied at least 1 scholarly (peer-reviewed) source to each question. Author accurately applied at least 1 scriptural/Biblical principles in each question response.

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

Author accurately applied at least 4 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources to the discussion. Author accurately applied at least 1 scholarly (peer-reviewed) source to each question. Author accurately applied at least 1 scriptural/Biblical principle in each question response.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Author accurately applied 1 -3 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources to the discussion. Author accurately applied at least 1 scholarly (peer-reviewed) source to some questions. Author accurately applied at least 1 scriptural/Biblical principle in each question response.

0 pts

Not Present

9 pts

Content - Part I - Mechanics, APA Style & Word Count

7 to >6.0 pts

Advanced

Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the essay. There are 0–1 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. There are 0–1 minor errors in APA format in the required items: citations and references. The word count of 800-1000 words is met.

6 to >5.0 pts

Proficient

There are 2-3 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. There are 2–3 minor errors in APA format in the required items. The word count of at least 750 words is met.

5 to >0.0 pts

Developing

There are 4-5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. There are more than 3 errors in APA format in the required items. The word count of 500–749 words.

0 pts

Not Present

7 pts

Discussion Grading Rubric | BUSI600_C01_202140

Criteria Ratings Points

Content - Part II - Two Individual Response Posts

9 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

Author responded to at least 2 different peers by posted deadlines. Insightful throughout. Completely developed all relevant information. Critical issues and key areas that supported each question were clearly identified, analyzed, and supported. Offer at least 1 strength and 1 weakness for each reply.

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

Author responded to at least 2 different peers by posted deadlines. Specific, solid. Less carefully developed. Some insights. Critical issues and key areas that supported each question were partially identified, analyzed, and supported. Offer at least 1 strength and 1 weakness for each reply.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Author responded to at least 1 different peer by posted deadlines. Vague, obvious, underdeveloped, or too broad. One or more main issues not identified. Limited evidence of critical thinking. Critical issues and key areas that supported each question were not clearly identified, analyzed, and supported. Offer at least 1 strength and 1 weakness for one reply.

0 pts

Not Present

9 pts

Content - Part II - Direct Application of Scholarly Research & Integration of Biblical Principles

9 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

Author accurately applied 2 or more scholarly (peer reviewed) sources to each peer response. Author accurately applied at least 1 scriptural/Biblical principles in each question response (no more than 10% of the total response).

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

Author accurately applied at least 2 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources to each peer response. Author accurately applied at least 1 scriptural/Biblical principle in each question response (no more than 10% of the total response).

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Author accurately applied 1 or 2 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources to some peer response. Author accurately applied at least 1 scriptural/Biblical principle in each question response (no more than 10% of the total response).

0 pts

Not Present

9 pts

Content - Part II - Mechanics, APA Style & Word Count

7 to >6.0 pts

Advanced

Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the essay. There are 0–1 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. There are 0–1 minor errors in APA format in the required items: citations and references. The word count of 450–600 words is met for each response.

6 to >5.0 pts

Proficient

There are 2-3 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. There are 2–3 minor errors in APA format in the required items. The word count of at least 400 words is met for each response.

5 to >0.0 pts

Developing

There are 4-5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. There are more than 3 errors in APA format in the required items. The word count of 300 - 399 words is met for each response.

0 pts

Not Present

7 pts

Total Points: 50

Discussion Grading Rubric | BUSI600_C01_202140