Trauma-Focused CBT for children and adolescents

Criteria

Advanced (A- to A):

Satisfies criteria w/ excellence

Proficient (B- to B+) :

Satisfies Criteria

Developing (C- to C+):

Satisfies most criteria

Below Expectations (F to D+):

Does not satisfy criteria

Not Present

Points

Earned

Content: 196 pts

Creativity and Originality

26–28 pts.

The presentation development reflects creative elements that engage the reader.

24–25 pts.

The presentation development reflects some creative elements.

22–23 pts.

Presentation is original but needs more creativity.

1–21 pts.

Presentation is not original and does not contain creative elements.

0 points

Presentation: Content

138–150 pts.

Presentation gives content accuracy describing the therapy model. All components as described in the assignment have been thoroughly addressed. Assertions are relevant and properly supported by evidence, including critiques of the theory. The presentation offers a solid summary of the central tenets of the theory and gives one or more case examples.

126–137 pts.

Presentation gives content accuracy describing the therapy model. All components as described in the assignment have been thoroughly addressed. Assertions are somewhat relevant and somewhat supported by evidence, including critiques of the theory. The presentation offers a summary of the central tenets of the theory and gives one or more case examples.

114–125 pts.

Presentation gives content some accuracy describing the therapy model. Some components as described in the assignment have been addressed. Assertions are somewhat relevant and somewhat supported by evidence, including critiques of the theory. The presentation gives a minimal summary of the central tenets of the theory and gives one or more case examples.

1–113 pts.

Presentation gives little content accuracy describing the therapy model. Few components as described in the assignment have been addressed. Assertions are not relevant and not supported by evidence, including critiques of the theory. The presentation gives few central tenets of the theory and does not give one or more case examples.

0 points

Replies: Content

17–18 pts.

Responses are well organized and reflect thorough, thoughtful review of the presentation. Responses interact with those making comments on the student’s presentation.

16 pts.

Responses are organized and reflect thoughtful review of the presentation. Responses interact with those making comments on the student’s presentation.

14–15 pts.

Responses are somewhat organized and reflect some review of the presentation. Responses interact with those making comments on the student’s presentation.

1–13 pts.

Responses are not organized and minimally reflect review of presentation. Minimal interaction with those making comments on the student’s presentation.

Structure: 84 pts

Presentation: Structure

39–42 pts.

All quality technical aspects (i.e. backgrounds, fonts, imagine and grammar)

36–38 pts.

Mostly technical aspects are quality (i.e. backgrounds, fonts, imagine and grammar)

32–35 pts.

Some technical aspects are quality (i.e. backgrounds, fonts, imagine and grammar)

1–31 pts.

Few technical aspects are quality (i.e. backgrounds, fonts, imagine and grammar)

0 points

Replies: Structure

39–42 pts.

Both responses are at least 250 words each. There are very few spelling and grammar errors.

36–38 pts.

Both responses organized; spelling and grammar are accurate with no typos. One response is under the required word count.

32–35 pts.

Both responses somewhat organized; some spelling and grammar errors. Both responses are under the required word count.

1–31 pts.

Both responses are not organized. Both responses contain many spelling and grammar errors. Both responses are significantly under the required word count.

0 points

Total

0 points

Instructor’s comments: