Reflection Discussion Post 3: Terministic Screen

profilemarybewy
DiscussionBoardRubric.pdf

Discussion Board Rubric

Class participation is an important expectation of this course. Students are expected to offer comments, questions, and

replies to the discussion question that has been posted for the modules. Students are expected to actively participate in

the required module's discussion board assignment throughout the semester (see syllabus).

Evaluation of Assignment: Postings will be evaluated on the quality of the postings and the degree that the postings follow the direction of the

discussion topic. (A= 20 points, C= 10 points, F= 0 Points)

Total /20 points Feedback:

Excellent

(20 Points)

Acceptable

(10 Points)

Unacceptable

(0 Points)

Score

Original

Post

 The post advances further discussion by stimulating at

least one substantial follow-up

post.

 Well-structured, logically sequenced sentences, written in

formal language.

 Contribution is thoughtful, analytical, and original.

 Author makes meaningful connections between content

and personal reflection current

events, etc.

 Free of grammatical/spelling errors.

 The post advances further discussion by stimulating at

least one substantial follow-up

post.

 Structure is present but organization of ideas is

somewhat sporadic.

 Shows evidence of analytical thought on the idea, but

analysis is not fully developed

or clearly presented.

 Somewhat meaningful connections between current

events, but connections are

not clearly presented.

 Some grammatical/spelling errors.

 Short post, which does not develop idea for

further discussion.

 Lacks structure and/or flow.

 Lacks insight or depth. Does not express

opinion clearly, and/or

shows little

understanding.

 Written in informal language

 Poor spelling and many grammatical errors.