Reflection Discussion Post 3: Terministic Screen
Discussion Board Rubric
Class participation is an important expectation of this course. Students are expected to offer comments, questions, and
replies to the discussion question that has been posted for the modules. Students are expected to actively participate in
the required module's discussion board assignment throughout the semester (see syllabus).
Evaluation of Assignment: Postings will be evaluated on the quality of the postings and the degree that the postings follow the direction of the
discussion topic. (A= 20 points, C= 10 points, F= 0 Points)
Total /20 points Feedback:
Excellent
(20 Points)
Acceptable
(10 Points)
Unacceptable
(0 Points)
Score
Original
Post
The post advances further discussion by stimulating at
least one substantial follow-up
post.
Well-structured, logically sequenced sentences, written in
formal language.
Contribution is thoughtful, analytical, and original.
Author makes meaningful connections between content
and personal reflection current
events, etc.
Free of grammatical/spelling errors.
The post advances further discussion by stimulating at
least one substantial follow-up
post.
Structure is present but organization of ideas is
somewhat sporadic.
Shows evidence of analytical thought on the idea, but
analysis is not fully developed
or clearly presented.
Somewhat meaningful connections between current
events, but connections are
not clearly presented.
Some grammatical/spelling errors.
Short post, which does not develop idea for
further discussion.
Lacks structure and/or flow.
Lacks insight or depth. Does not express
opinion clearly, and/or
shows little
understanding.
Written in informal language
Poor spelling and many grammatical errors.