discussion 300 WORDS EACH (Mass com)
In one corner are those who want to make sure all websites are equally accessible and also enjoy equal treatment in terms of speed and availability. In the other corner are internet service providers such as Verizon (which initiated a 2016 Net Neutrality challenge), who could charge certain providers like Netflix more for special "fast lanes" of content distribution, as well as those who are opposed to the regulations and consumer protections that are afforded public utilities.
Read the following articles and watch the videos to see what people are saying about this landmark case. Make sure you watch/read all of them because they each present different ideas and information, though there will be some overlap. This can be a confusing concept. Email me after you've read and watched all of the content below if you are still having difficulty understanding it.
Read: FCC repeals Net Neutrality rules (2017) https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/14/technology/net-neutrality-repeal-vote.html Read: States pursue their own Net Neutrality rules https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2018/04/20/net-neutrality-repeal-prompts-calif-other-states-pursue-their-own-laws/529337002/
Video: How the End of Net Neutrality Could Change the Internet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqXKEgTYZBQ
Read/Reference: Wired Guide to Net Neutrality https://www.wired.com/story/guide-net-neutrality/
Now answer the following questions in a discussion post of at least 300 words.
1. Which side of the Net Neutrality debate do you fall on? State your argument for why Net Neutrality rules should be in place or not. MAKE SURE TO READ ALL ARTICLES AND WATCH THE VIDEO BECAUSE THEY PRESENT A VARIETY OF INFORMATION ON THIS TOPIC. You must use examples from the videos/articles to back up your point.
2. Do you access Internet sites that use large chunks of bandwidth, such as Netflix or Hulu? Keeping this in mind, how might this decision affect you and other consumers of these streaming media content providers?