social ethics discussions

5/10/22, 7:10 AM Topic: Week 5 Case Discussion Questions - New Case Study Group 1

https://seattleu.instructure.com/groups/293194/discussion_topics/7972143/submit 1/6



This is a graded discussion: 2 points possible due Apr 27

Week 5 Case Discussion Questions - New Case Study Group 1 From UCOR 2910 02

12 12

Search entries or author

 Reply

Watch the videoclip explaining Kant's reasoning about never lying even in the scenario involving an axe murderer. Explain why you agree or disagree with Kant. If you disagree with Kant, first try to explain your reasons with him according to his own principles. Does the categorical imperative of never lying conflict with other versions of his categorical imperative (e.g. treat others as ends)? If you find that there is no internal conflict within Kant's other versions, then articulate the ethical framework outside Kant's that best supports your disagreement. If you agree with Kant about never lying, even to an axe murderer, then try to explain how this is justified in light of his more socially inclined versions of the categorical imperative, such as his ideal of a "kingdom of ends" -- could Kant's ethics here actually help build a community of trust and mutual flourishing? After providing your answer, you will need to substantively engage with answers from two other students by Sunday.

Kant's AxeKant's Axe

Unread    Subscribe