Discussion 250 words. Make sure you provide 2 references and utilize APA style.. . Attached instruction and Rubric
butterflyl
Discussion2.docxDiscussion 2
Welcome to week three of your nursing theory course. As we progress, this week’s reading assignments from your Smith and Parker textbook will include progression into Section II which includes Conceptual Influences on the Evolution of Nursing Theory. Please read and reflect upon the following assignments:
Chapter 5: Early Conceptualizations About Nursing
Let us review the works of Wiedenbach (conceptualizations of nursing), Henderson (who believed in the categorizations of functions that pertained to patient care), and Hall (who envisioned three overlapping circles of care – person, body, and disease from crisis to rehabilitation) that introduced nursing theory and explore the importance of nurse-patient relationships (Smith & Parker 2015).
Chapter 6: Nurse-Patient Relationship Theories
This reading assignment focuses on conceptualizations by Travelbee, a former nursing educator, (who practiced psychiatric/mental health care) that serves as a framework that delineates the nurse-patient interaction. Remembering that patients or clients are exceptional and nursing care is delivered across several stages (Smith & Parker, 2015).
This week we will move forward with the discussion of concepts related to these theorists. I hope that you will enjoy your reading assignments and discussion interactions.
Smith, M. C., & Parker, M. E. (2015). Nursing theories and nursing practice. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
Ernestine Wiedenbach
Virginia Henderson – Nursing Theorist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Umm1hs-Qgig
Lydia Hall Nursing – Nursing Theory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UdxKy8C5LA
Joyce Travelbee – Nursing Theory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHUVfZu64sU
Discussion Post Rubric:
Each posting and Reading Reflection:
|
Criteria |
1 Point |
0.75 Point |
0.50 Point |
0.25 Point |
|
Participation Weight 25.00% |
100 % 3 Posts |
80 % 2 Posts |
60 % 1 Post |
0 % 0 Posts |
|
Quality of information Weight 25.00% |
100 % Information is clear and relates to the topic |
80 % Information is somewhat clear and might relate to the topic |
60 % The information has little relation to the topic and is not clearly displayed |
0 % Information is not clear, and it does not relate to the topic |
|
Resources Weight 25.00% |
100 % Provides resources using APA guidelines |
80 % Provides resources without APA guidelines |
60 % Limited on the resources provided with major errors in APA |
0 % Provides no resources |
