D.1 Global Health Foundations
nirmak
Discussion1GlobalhealthFdns.docxDiscussion 1 Global health Fdns
(This is a 2-part discussion). Note: click on "Link" to get to the information.
Part 1 Everyone: View the video 200 Countries, 200 Years, 4 Minutes (4:48 minutes) (Links to an external site.). Discuss how your view of health changes from micro-level view (personal and family) of healthcare and quality of life to a macro-level view (from a global perspective).
Part 2: Post to the discussion that matches your last name. Read the post of classmates and respond to a different post other than your original one. Each post consists of 2-parts.
Post that matches my last name :
Part One: Explore the website for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (Links to an external site.). Discuss what you learned.
Part Two: Differentiate between medicine and public health.
|
Evaluation for Discussion Board: Original Post |
|
|
Application and Critical Thinking · Contribution reflects knowledge of assigned readings AND includes application, critical thinking, and scholarly composition (21 points) · Contribution reflects knowledge of assigned readings; includes moderate application, critical thinking, and scholarly composition (14 points) · Contribution does not incorporate knowledge from assigned readings; does not include clinical application, critical thinking, and scholarly composition (7 points) · Comments of limited nature and does not add to discussion (0 points) |
Maximum Points Possible- 21 |
|
Scholarly Writing · Message is organized and coherent and there are no errors in spelling, grammar or punctuation. At least one citation in APA format for original post. (21 points) · Message is on topic, but includes minor errors in spelling, grammar or punctuation. At least one citation in APA format, with minor errors (14 points) · Message is on topic, but includes numerous errors in spelling, grammar or punctuation. At least than one citation in APA format, with numerous errors (7 points) · Message is disorganized or lacking in general good writing standards. No citations (0 points) |
Maximum Points Possible- 21 |
|
Maximum points for original post |
42 |
