BUSI740: Managing the Supply Chain Hewlett Packard Company Network Printer Design for Universality

Criteria Ratings Points

Quality of Information

42 to >38.0 pts

Advanced

All key components of the Discussion prompt are answered, and it has a clear, logical flow. The major points are stated clearly and supported by good examples or thoughtful analysis. The post advances the discussion to contribute to the participants' learning and provides insights, asks probing questions that get to the heart of critical issues, and shares from personal and professional experience. Each question is answered thoroughly, and the responses are supported by the concepts introduced in the reading/study materials.

38 to >36.0 pts

Proficient

Most of the components of the Discussion prompt are answered in the thread, and it has a logical flow. The major points are stated reasonably well and are supported by good examples or thoughtful analysis. The post advances the discussion in a way that contributes to the participants' learning and provides insights, asks probing questions that get to the heart of critical issues, and shares from personal and professional experience. Each question is answered, and the responses are supported by some of the concepts introduced in the reading/study materials.

36 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The Discussion prompt is addressed minimally and the thread lacks flow or content. The major points are unclear or confusing, and the major points are not supported by examples or thoughtful analysis. Each question is not answered thoroughly. The responses are not supported by the concepts introduced in the reading/study materials.

0 pts

Not Present

42 pts

Grammar and Spelling, Current APA Formatting

6 to >5.0 pts

Advanced

The spelling, grammar, and punctuation are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures. The thread is supported with at least 2 peer-reviewed journal articles and is in current APA format. A reference list is present, and each question/answer is delineated under an APA heading.

5 to >4.0 pts

Proficient

The post contains less than three spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors. Sentences are presented well. Paragraphs contain varied sentence structure. Less than two peer-reviewed journal articles are included. The thread does meet APA formatting guidelines.

4 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The post contains more than three spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors that distract the reader from comprehending the ideas presented. Sentences are incomplete or unclear. Paragraphs are poorly formed. References are not cited. APA formatting issues are present.

0 pts

Not Present

6 pts

Discussion: Hewlett-Packard Company: Network Printer Design for Universality Grading Rubric | BUSI740_B01_202340

Criteria Ratings Points

Length 6 to >5.0 pts

Advanced

The thread is greater than 2 well-developed paragraphs. It is a minimum of 500 words.

5 to >4.0 pts

Proficient

The thread is a minimum of 2 developed paragraphs. It is 350-499 words.

4 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The thread is less than 2 paragraphs and does not communicate unique and substantive thoughts. The thread is less than 350 words.

0 pts

Not Present

6 pts

Replies 3 to >2.0 pts

Advanced

Each reply focuses on a meaningful point made in another student’s thread. Each reply provides additional substantive thoughts regarding the thread and explains why the student agrees or disagrees with the ideas presented in the thread. Each reply is clear and coherent, adding additional thoughts. Each reply is at least 250 words (excluding headings and references). At least two thoughtful replies are offered to two different students.

2 to >1.0 pts

Proficient

At least one reply focuses on a meaningful point made in another student’s thread and is clear and coherent. The student provides additional substantive thoughts regarding the thread, and the replies are at least 150-249 words (excluding headings and references). Student adds additional thoughts to two different students.

1 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The replies focus on a point made in another student’s thread and is less than 149 words (excluding headings and references). The replies lack clarity and coherence. Student does not add additional thoughts and/or replies to less than two different students.

0 pts

Not Present

3 pts

Discussion: Hewlett-Packard Company: Network Printer Design for Universality Grading Rubric | BUSI740_B01_202340

Criteria Ratings Points

Replies: Grammar and Spelling, Current APA Formatting

3 to >2.0 pts

Advanced

Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures. Where applicable, references are cited in current APA format. Note: APA style includes all aspects of writing style and is more than formatting headings, citations, and references. Please use the current edition of the APA style manual.

2 to >1.0 pts

Proficient

Some spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors are present. Sentences are presented well. Paragraphs contain varied sentence structures. Where applicable, references are cited using current APA formatting. Note: APA style includes all aspects of writing style and is more than formatting headings, citations, and references. Please use the current edition of the APA style manual.

1 pts

Developing

Spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors distract from the replies. Sentences are incomplete or unclear. Paragraphs are poorly formed. Where applicable, references are minimally or not cited in current APA format. Note: APA style includes all aspects of writing style and is more than formatting headings, citations, and references. Please use the current edition of the APA style manual.

1 to >0 pts

Not Present

3 pts

Total Points: 60

Discussion: Hewlett-Packard Company: Network Printer Design for Universality Grading Rubric | BUSI740_B01_202340