|
Criteria
|
Levels of Achievement
|
|
Content
70%
|
Advanced 90-100%
|
Proficient 70-89%
|
Developing 1-69%
|
Not present
|
|
Marketing Strategies
|
13 to 14 points
All assignment components are thoughtfully and comprehensively detailed, reflecting collegiate level reasoning and support. Relevant examples or explanations render a clear understanding of the assignment principles.
|
10 to 12
Most of the components of the Discussion Board Forum prompt are answered in the thread, though more detail would render a more comprehensive review of the assignment. The thread has a logical flow. Major points are stated reasonably well. Major points are supported by good examples or analysis.
|
1 to 9
The Discussion Board Forum prompt is addressed minimally. The thread lacks flow or content. Major points are unclear or confusing. Major points are not supported by examples or thoughtful analysis.
|
0 points
Not present
|
|
Retail Models
|
14 to 15 points
All assignment components are thoughtfully and comprehensively detailed, reflecting collegiate level reasoning and support. Relevant examples or explanations render a clear understanding of the assignment principles.
|
11 to 13
Most of the components of the Discussion Board Forum prompt are answered in the thread, though more detail would render a more comprehensive review of the assignment. The thread has a logical flow. Major points are stated reasonably well. Major points are supported by good examples or analysis.
|
1 to 10
The Discussion Board Forum prompt is addressed minimally. The thread lacks flow or content. Major points are unclear or confusing. Major points are not supported by examples or thoughtful analysis.
|
0 points
Not present
|
|
Marketing
Innovation
|
14 to 15 points
All assignment components are thoughtfully and comprehensively detailed, reflecting collegiate level reasoning and support. Relevant examples or explanations render a clear understanding of the assignment principles.
|
11 to 13 points
Most of the components of the Discussion Board Forum prompt are answered in the thread, though more detail would render a more comprehensive review of the assignment. The thread has a logical flow. Major points are stated reasonably well. Major points are supported by good examples or analysis.
|
1 to 10 points
The Discussion Board Forum prompt is addressed minimally. The thread lacks flow or content. Major points are unclear or confusing. Major points are not supported by examples or thoughtful analysis.
|
0 points
Not present
|
|
Spiritual Integration
|
5 points
Provides detailed answer/application to Scriptural integration prompt.
|
4 points
Minimum word count of 100-199 words met.
|
1-3 points
Minimum word count of 1-99 words met.
|
0 points
Not present
|
|
Structure 30%
|
Advanced 90-100%
|
Proficient 70-89%
|
Developing 1-69%
|
Not present
|
|
Thread: Grammar and Spelling, Word Count.
|
19 to 21 points
Meets 350-word minimum, spelling and grammar are correct in accordance with APA requirements. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise, pertinent to the assignment topic(s). Where applicable, references are cited in current APA format.
|
15 to 18 points
Spelling, grammar and formatting to APA requirements has some errors. Sentences are presented well, with few structural errors. Paragraphs contain some varied sentence structures. Where applicable, references are cited with some APA formatting.
|
1 to 14 points
Spelling and grammar errors distract. Sentences are incomplete or unclear. Paragraphs are poorly formed. Where applicable, references are minimally or not cited in current APA format.
|
0 points
Not present
|
quenton79
Discussion_Board_Forum_2_Grading_Rubric.docx
0
