Disciplinary Counsel v. Hernandez

profileTynetta_1186
DiscRubric40pts.docx

Discussion Rubric

Accomplished

40-30

Satisfactory

29-25

Unsatisfactory

24-0

Quality of Content

(75% Weight)

Post/Reply: Student is responsive to the discussion prompt. Student shows accurate and in-depth/applied knowledge of the material. Content is detailed and clear. Correct citations used.

Post/Reply: Student is mostly responsive to the discussion prompt. Student shows accurate knowledge of the material. Content is somewhat detailed and clear. Mostly correct citations used.

 Post/Reply: Student is minimally responsive to the discussion prompt or skims the surface of the assignment. Student shows limited or inaccurate understanding of, or ability to apply, the material. Content is vague and lacks detail. Incorrect citations or citations are missing.

Grammar and Netiquette

(25% Weight)

Post/Reply: Student uses complete sentences, correct spelling, punctuation, & grammar. Word usage is appropriate and clear. Student observed proper netiquette expressing viewpoints, disagreements, alternative views or questions in a courteous, respectful way.

 Post/Reply: Student is reasonably clear and generally grammatically correct. Student observed proper netiquette expressing viewpoints, disagreements, alternative views or questions in a courteous, respectful way.

 Post/Reply: Post/Reply is unclear and poorly written in terms of grammar. Student did not observe proper netiquette. Student was not respectful of opposing viewpoints.

 

 

 

Content (x 75%):

Grammar/Netiquette (x 25%):

Final Score:

This rubric is adapted from “Example of a Discussion Board Rubric,” Patrice Torcivia Prusko, IT@Cornell, URL: https://it.cornell.edu