Human Services Capston
Doctoral Project Plan (DPP)
SCHOOL OF COUNSELING AND HUMAN SERVICES
DOCTORAL PROJECT PLAN
STATEMENT OF ORIGINAL WORK
I understand that Capella University’s Academic Honesty Policy (3.01.01) holds learners accountable for the integrity of work they submit, which includes, but is not limited to, discussion postings, assignments, comprehensive exams, and the Capstone. Learners are expected to understand the policy and know that it is their responsibility to learn about instructor and general academic expectations with regard to proper citation of sources in written work as specified in the APA Publication Manual, 6th Ed. Serious sanctions can result from violations of any type of the Academic Honesty Policy, including dismissal from the university.
I attest that this document represents my own work. Where I have used the ideas of others, I have paraphrased and given credit according to the guidelines of the APA Publication Manual, 6th Ed. Where I have used the words of others (i.e., direct quotes), I have followed the guidelines for using direct quotes prescribed by the APA Publication Manual, 6th Ed.
I have read, understood, and abided by Capella University’s Academic Honesty Policy (3.01.01). I further understand that Capella University takes plagiarism seriously; regardless of intention, the result is the same.
Signature for Statement of Original Work (MUST COMPLETE) |
|||
Learner Name |
|
Mentor Name |
|
Learner Email |
|
Mentor Email |
|
Learner ID |
|
Date |
|
Capstone Project Plan Process
You will use this form to successfully complete your keystone class, obtaining Milestone 1, and obtaining Milestone 2 approval. The goals of this process are: (1) facilitate the planning of the details of your doctoral research project, (2) allow for scientific merit review, and (3) facilitate your progress through the Capstone. You must obtain approval of your Doctoral Project Plan before seeking IRB approval, collecting data, and writing your Capstone manuscript. Approval of your Doctoral Project Plan (DPP) will satisfy the Capstone Milestone 2, indicating that the Doctoral Project Plan (DPP) has passed the scientific merit review part of the IRB process.
The scientific merit process is designed to ensure that a proposed research study contains an appropriate level of scientific rigor and merit prior to ethical review. Rigor is achieved if the study is well-designed and has adequate resources so that participants are not exposed to unnecessary harms. Merit is achieved if the rights and welfare of the human research participants are protected
**Obtaining Scientific Merit approval for the Doctoral Project Plan (DPP) does not guarantee you will obtain IRB approval. A detailed ethical review will be conducted during the process of IRB approval.
How to Use This Form
This Doctoral Project Plan (DPP) form is intended to help you plan the details of your Capstone Project. It provides a space for you to work out all the details of your design. Once you have obtained Doctoral Project Plan (DPP) approval, you should be able to easily expand on the information you have submitted here to complete the deliverable of your proposed Capstone Project and write the Capstone Final Report because these sections follow the outline of the Doctoral Capstone Report. It is recommended that you use this form in a step-by-step way to help you design your study. Expect that you will go through several revisions before obtaining approval of this form. Research planning is an iterative process; each revision often sparking the need for further revisions until everything is aligned. These iterations and revisions are a necessary and customary part of the research process.
Do’s and Don’ts
· Do use the correct form!
· Don’t lock the form. That will stop you from editing and revising within the form.
· Do complete the “Learner Information” and Section 1 first.
· Don’t skip items or sections. If an item does not apply to your study, type “NA” in its field.
· Don’t delete the descriptions and instructions in each section!
· Do read the item descriptions carefully. Items request very specific information. Be sure you understand what is asked.
· Do use primary sources to the greatest extent possible as references. Textbooks are NOT acceptable as the only references supporting methodological and design choices. Use textbooks to track down the primary sources.
· If you change any design elements after your DPP is approved, you must submit a revised Doctoral Project Plan. A current DPP must be on file before your IRB application is submitted.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
Complete the following steps to prepare and submit your DPP for Scientific Merit Review (SMR) approval for your doctoral Capstone Project.
· Keystone Learners: Your Keystone Instructor will facilitate the initial process.
· Capstone Learners: Your Mentor will facilitate this process.
CITI Research Training
Mentees must complete the CITI Research training and submit your CITI completion certificate to your Keystone Instructor.
Milestone 1: Topic Approval
Complete Section 1 (1.1 and 1.2) of the DPP form for topic approval.
There are two ways to achieve Milestone 1:
1. If Section 1 of your DPP meets the rigor for a viable topic, your keystone instructor will submit for school review. Receiving 80% on the DPP does not mean that it is ready for the topic plan review.
a. You will work on all sections of the DPP during the Keystone Course, even if you do not achieve topic approval. This will allow the Keystone Instructor to introduce you to the necessary components of the Doctoral Project Plan.
2. If Section 1 is not submitted for topic approval during the Keystone Course (HMSV8700), your Mentor will submit the topic plan in the Capstone Course – HMSV9971.
Milestones 2: Doctoral Project Plan
1. Work with your Capstone Mentor to complete and make any necessary refinements to the DPP form.
a. If you did not receive topic approval in the Keystone Course, you will refine sections 1 (1.1 and 1.2) and submit to your Capstone Mentor. Your Capstone Mentor will submit section 1 for topic approval. After topic approval, you will proceed to step 2.
2. Once you have topic approval (whether in the Keystone or Capstone Course), you will refine and complete sections 2 – 7 in the DPP form. Make sure all sections are aligned with the DHS Programs of Professional Practice and the DHS Doctoral Capstone Handbook. —changes in one section could necessitate changes in another section.
3. After you have a polished version, you should review the DPP criteria with the rubric to ensure you have provided the required information to demonstrate you have met each of the scientific merit criteria.
4. Submit the completed form to your Capstone Mentor.
Scientific Merit Review(SMR)
The scientific merit reviewer will review each item against a rubric to determine whether you have met each of the criteria. You must meet all the criteria at a level of “Proficient” or greater to obtain reviewer approval. The reviewer will designate your Doctoral Project Plan (DPP) as one of the following:
· Approved
· Deferred
· Not Ready for Review
If the Doctoral Project Plan (DPP) is Deferred or Not Ready for Review:
· The SMR reviewer will provide feedback on any criteria that you have not met.
· You are required to make the necessary revisions and obtain approval for the revisions from your Mentor.
· Once you have Mentor approval for your revisions, your Mentor will submit your Doctoral Project Plan (DPP) for a second review.
· You will be notified if your Doctoral Project Plan (DPP) has been approved or deferred for revisions.
· Up to three attempts to obtain Scientific Merit Review (SMR) approval are allowed. Researchers, Mentors, and Reviewers should make every possible attempt to resolve issues before the Doctoral Project Plan (DPP) is deferred for the third time. If a learner does not pass the scientific merit review on the third attempt, then the case will be referred to the Research Chair and/or Program Chair in your School for review, evaluation, and intervention.
· While you await approval of your Doctoral Project Plan (DPP), you should begin working on your Ethics Paper. Your Mentor has a template for you to follow.
· Once you have gained approval on your DPP (Milestone 2), you are ready to submit your Ethics Paper and IRB application and supporting documents for review by the IRB Committee.
Milestone 3: IRB Approval
1. Once you obtain SMR approval, you will begin and complete an eight to 10 page ethics paper. This paper is a conceptual analysis of ethical principles typically related to all professional Capstone Projects. Your Mentor has a template for you to follow.
2. Once your Mentor has approved your Ethics Paper, you will complete your IRB application through IRBManager and submit any accompanying materials.
3. Consult the Research and Scholarship area within iGuide for IRB forms and detailed process directions.
**You are required to obtain scientific merit approval (SMR) before you may receive IRB approval. Obtaining SMR approval does not guarantee that IRB approval will follow.
Milestone 4: Pre-Data Collection Call
1. Once you have gained approval by the IRB, you are ready to schedule your Pre-Data Collection Conference Call. You may not proceed to data collection until you have completed this call.
2. Work with your Mentor and Doctoral Committee to set a date for the conference call.
3. Upon successful completion of the Pre-Data Collection Conference Call, your Mentor will mark Milestone 4 complete, and you may proceed with data collection.
|
Learner and Specialization Information (MUST BE COMPETED)
Learners, please insert your answers directly into the expandable boxes that have been provided. |
|
|
Learner Name |
|
|
Learner Email |
|
|
Learner ID Number |
|
|
Mentor Name |
|
|
Mentor Email |
|
|
Specialization (check one) |
|_| Leadership and Organizational Management |_| Program Evaluation and Data Analytics |
|
Specialization Chair Name |
|
|
Specialization Chair Email |
|
|
Committee Member #1 Name |
|
|
Committee Member #1 Email |
|
|
Committee Member #2 Name |
|
|
Committee Member #2 Email |
|
|
Capstone Type (check one) |
|_| Research Paper |_| Professional Product |
|
Deliverable (check one) |
Research Paper |_| Action Research Monograph |_| Program Evaluation Professional Product |_| Service Project |_| Change Management Plan
|
|
Section 1. Topic Endorsement Please, use single-spaced, Times Roman 11 pt. throughout the form – the boxes will expand as you input text.
|
|
1.1 Capstone Topic (2 paragraphs) Clearly describe the topic of the Capstone Project.
This section should include:· FIRST PARAGRAPH: State the topic of the capstone project. The topic statement should include the problem or opportunity for improvement in the project. The concepts of the topic must be clear and focused and well supported in the literature.· Begin this paragraph with, “The topic is…”
· SECOND PARAGRAPH: Describe the significance of this topic to Human Services AND the specialization within your program. Include a statement about the practical implications of the project by describing the impact of this Capstone Project on the organization or community of interest.Example - The topic of this capstone project is the effectiveness of a transitional summer program, Helping Others, Inc., on middle school students' chance of success (graduation) in high school.The topic should be correctly formed:
· The topic should be appropriate for the specialization. · The topic should use appropriate language for key concepts/phenomena. · The type of action proposed should be clearly specified. · The community of interest/organization/program or community and target population should be named. · The concepts should be appropriately focused. · The topic should be supported by at least ten (10) citations. · The topic should be in alignment with current literature and the DHS Programs of Professional Practice.
Use current (within 5-7 years), scholarly, PRIMARY resources to support statements. Textbooks are not primary resources. Theses and dissertations are not considered peer-reviewed published articles. Use APA style in citing all resources.
|
|
|
|
1.2 Research Problem (2 Paragraphs)
Write a brief statement of the problem or need for improvement at the capstone site or program. Clearly describe the gap in current practice, service, process, policy, and/or the identified outcome. Identify the performance gap you wish to close and the potential root causes of the problem.
This section should include: · FIRST PARAGRAPH: Write a brief statement that fully describes the problem being addressed. This paragraph introduces the problem that is informing the research and warrants the need for this study.· Begin this paragraph with the statement, “The problem is…”Example: The problem is that Helping Others, Inc’s transitional summer program has not consistently improved high school graduation rates.
· SECOND PARAGRAPH: Identify the need for the study. The need should be directly related to the problem presented in the first paragraph. It must clearly identify a gap in current practice, service, process, policy, or programs. It must clearly identify the need for the research and the desired outcome.
Example: This study is needed because high school graduation rates are decreasing in the service community where Helping Others Inc. provides its transitional summer program. Decreased graduation rates have negatively affected the unemployment rate in the area.Use current (within 5-7 years), scholarly, PRIMARY resources to support statements. Textbooks are not primary resources. Theses and dissertations are not considered peer-reviewed published articles. Use APA style in citing all resources.
|
|
|
|
Learners Specialization Chair Topic Approval · After completing Section 1, Keystone or Capstone Learners should submit the DPP form to your Keystone Instructor or Capstone Mentor for approval. · Collaborate with your Keystone Instructor or Capstone Mentor until you have approval for Section 1, “Topic Approval.” · After you have received your Mentor’s approval for Section 1, your form will be submitted for SMR review. |
|
|_| Approved |_| Deferred |_| Not Ready For Review Reviewer Name: Reviewer signature: Date: Comments:
|
APPENDIX A
SAMPLE QUANTITATIVE MEASURES CHART
|
Variable Type |
Variable Name |
Survey/Questions/ Calculations (see attached survey) |
Variable Level of Measure-ment |
Instrument Name |
Reliability Estimates |
|
Demo- graphics |
Gender |
Q#1 |
Nominal |
|
N/A |
|
|
Age |
Q#2 |
Interval |
|
N/A |
|
|
Ethnicity |
Q#3 |
Nominal |
|
N/A |
|
|
Type of neighborhood |
Q#4 |
Nominal |
|
N/A |
|
Independent Variables |
Cultural competence |
Q# 5 through Q# 19 All items on the scale will be summed together 1= Totally unprepared 2= Somewhat unprepared 3= Prepared but need practice 4= Ready to practice 5= Competent
*The total number of questions in the cultural competency scale is 14. The range for the scale equals 14 to 70. The higher the number, the higher the level of cultural competency.
|
Ordinal |
Attitude, Skills, Knowledge (ASK) |
Cronbach’s alpha in other studies ranged between .91-.95 for social work practitioners |
APPENDIX B
SAMPLE QUALITATIVE DATA CHART
|
Data Source |
Specific Data Source |
Constructs of Interest |
Specific Interview Question |
|
Archival Documents |
Agency Background Information Service statistics including numbers served, types of services provided, client demographics; diagnostic profiles (frequency and distribution); agency budgets, funding sources, the board of directors composition; staff data including licenses represented, years of service, length of employment, attrition rates, gender, racial and ethnic composition.
|
Attitude toward gay men and women and gay affirmative practice. |
N/A |
|
Researcher Observation |
For the purposes of this case study, research observation will include participant as an observer (researcher spends an extended amount of time in the setting but does not play an actual role) and observer as a participant (researcher interacts, interviews, and questions people within the setting) as the observational approaches. Field notes will document the content of these observations and experiences within the setting and will provide a primary source of reflective data for the case study. Field notes must be detailed and descriptive, containing both the observed data and the researcher’s responses, feelings, and impressions of the setting (Patton, 2002).
|
Attitude toward gay men and women and gay affirmative practice. |
N/A |
|
Individual Interviews |
Agency personnel |
Attitude toward gay men and women and gay affirmative practice. |
Can you describe the overall attitude of the agency toward discussing gay and lesbian issues? (see attached interview) |
|
Program Statements/Website Review/Media Review |
Agency mission statements, agency values/vision statements, diversity statements, client handbooks, brochures, web sites, Facebook, and other social media sites, newspaper clippings, video representations, electronic communications.
|
Attitude toward gay men and women and gay affirmative practice. |
|
APPENDIX C
SAMPLE TIMELINE CHART
|
Quarter |
Activity |
Estimated time frame |
|
Q1 2017 |
Recruit agency supervisors |
Weeks 1-4 |
|
Q1 2017 |
Conduct face to face interviews with agency supervisors |
Weeks 1-10 |
1
Version 6.0 effective April 2020