critique
|
|
Good 2 pts |
Fair 1.5 pts |
Poor 1 pts |
Bad 0 pts |
|
Summary |
Good The article is clearly but succinctly summarized - only the key points of the article are touched upon. The article summary takes up no more than one third of the total assignment. |
Fair The article is clearly summarized, but some sub points are addressed along with main points. |
Poor The article summary is unclear or overly detailed. Often well over half of the assignment is taken up by the summary. |
No Effort |
|
Critique |
Good Strengths and weaknesses that are central to the article are addressed. The discussion of strengths and weaknesses take up the majority of the assignment. |
Fair Strengths and weaknesses that are peripheral to the article are addressed. The discussion of strengths and weaknesses take up the majority of the assignment |
Poor Strengths and weaknesses are addressed peripherally, weakly, or not at all. The discussion of strengths and weaknesses take up only a small part of the assignment |
|
|
Mechanics |
Good There are no grammatical errors or typos. |
Fair There are few grammatical errors or typos |
Poor There are many grammatical errors and/or typos |
|
|
Format |
Good APA/MLA and page length requirements are met |
Fair APA/MLA and page length requirements are met |
Poor APA/MLA and page length requirements are not met. |
|