CPS Avtivity

profilela_amoon
DHM2003RubricCPS1.docx

Fall 2019 DHM 2003 Problem Solving Strategies

LC# Rubric for CPS #1

Criteria

Description

Score

Title page & Table of contents (2.5%)

The title page and table of contents are appropriate.

A = Exceptional (0.5)

B = Solid, but could have been better (0.4)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.35

D = Many concerns (0.3)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

Problem Statement (5%)

The problem statement is clearly stated.

A = Exceptional (1.0)

B = Solid, but could have been better (0.8)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.7)

D = Many concerns (0.6)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

Literature Review

(10%)

Provided literature review while sharing 3-5 references.

A = Exceptional (2.0)

B = Solid, but could have been better (1.6)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (1.4)

D = Many concerns (1.2)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

Methodology (10%)

The methodology is explained clearly. Used two or more creative thinking tools (brainstorming and force-fitting as a minimum).

A = Exceptional (2.0)

B = Solid, but could have been better (1.6)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (1.4)

D = Many concerns (1.2)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

Initial and Final Design (15%)

Included sketches of both the initial and final design, and described them in detail.

A = Exceptional (3.0)

B = Solid, but could have been better (2.4)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (2.1)

D = Many concerns (1.8)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

Innovation (10%)

Did push boundaries in terms of coming up with a unique design.

A = Exceptional (2.0)

B = Solid, but could have been better (1.6)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (1.4)

D = Many concerns (1.2)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

Target Market (5%)

Provided demographics for the target market and briefly discussed.

A = Exceptional (1.0)

B = Solid, but could have been better (0.8)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.7)

D = Many concerns (0.6)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

Rationale for the design (5%)

Provided a rationale as to why the design will be liked the target market.

A = Exceptional (1.0)

B = Solid, but could have been better (0.8)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.7)

D = Many concerns (0.6)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

Assumptions (5%)

Listed all the assumptions made (2-3 minimum).

A = Exceptional (1.0)

B = Solid, but could have been better (0.8)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.7)

D = Many concerns (0.6)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

Lessons learned (5%)

Shared lessons learned using 5-10 sentences.

A = Exceptional (1.0)

B = Solid, but could have been better (0.8)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.7)

D = Many concerns (0.6)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

Summary (5%)

Provided a summary of the assignment.

A = Exceptional (1.0)

B = Solid, but could have been better (0.8)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.7)

D = Many concerns (0.6)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

Appendix (2.5%)

Listed all the ideas generated in the Appendix, along with any initial sketches

A = Exceptional (0.5)

B = Solid, but could have been better (0.4)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.35

D = Many concerns (0.3)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

References (5%)

Listed all the references used in-text at the end.

A = Exceptional (1.0)

B = Solid, but could have been better (0.8)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.7)

D = Many concerns (0.6)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

Organization (2.5%)

The report is organized well.

A = Exceptional (0.5)

B = Solid, but could have been better (0.4)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.35

D = Many concerns (0.3)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

Written Communication (10%)

The report is written clearly using appropriate tense and voice, and also with no grammatical errors.

A = Exceptional (2.0)

B = Solid, but could have been better (1.6)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (1.4)

D = Many concerns (1.2)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)

APA format (2.5%)

Used APA format in-text and at the end while citing the references.

A = Exceptional (0.5)

B = Solid, but could have been better (0.4)

C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.35

D = Many concerns (0.3)

F = Does not meet expectations (0)