HM assignment

CAUTIONARY DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS & WEBSITE DISCLAIMER: All forward-looking information in this report should be read with, and is qualifi ed in its entirety by, the Cautionary Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and the Risk Factors disclosures set forth in the Introduction and in Item 1A, respectively, of the Form 10-K included elsewhere in this report. The information contained on or connected to our Internet website is not incorporated by reference into this report and should not be considered part of this or any other report that we fi le with or furnish to the SEC.

757

116 430

216 47

56

45

849

866

236

544 520

235 524

559

45

137

55

511

134

516

510

814 772

1,474

440

792

418 242

541

22

11

52

123

52

26

99

735

36 36

15

132

169 461

Dollar General Corporation has been delivering value to

shoppers for nearly 80 years. Dollar General helps shoppers

Save time. Save money. Every day!® by o� ering products that are frequently used and replenished, such as food, snacks,

health and beauty aids, cleaning supplies, basic apparel,

housewares and seasonal items at everyday low prices in

convenient neighborhood locations. Dollar General operated

15,370 stores in 44 states as of February 1, 2019. In addition

to high-quality private brands, Dollar General sells products

from America’s most-trusted manufacturers such as Clorox,

Energizer, Procter & Gamble, Hanes, Coca-Cola, Mars, Unilever,

Nestle, Kimberly-Clark, Kellogg’s, General Mills, and PepsiCo.

A B O U T

Learn more about Dollar General and shop online at: www.dollargeneral.com

door expansion, healthier food options at affordable prices and new private label products for health and beauty, cosmetics and baby. We expect to improve gross margins over the long term through many actions, such as adding Electronic Article Surveillance units, optimizing our supply chain, and diversifying and growing foreign sourcing penetration.

2. Capturing growth opportunities: Our proven high- return, low-risk real estate growth model has enabled us to successfully open hundreds of stores that meet our strict return thresholds and invest in new formats, store growth and a remodel program. We expect our innovation to drive further improvements in store formats that will support our runway for growth. In 2019 we plan to open 975 new stores, remodel 1,000 mature stores and relocate 100 stores to better serve our customers across the country.

3. Leveraging and reinforcing our position as a low cost operator: We have an established, clear and defined process to control spending across the organization. We are managing expenses by optimizing product assortment, reducing operating complexity and decreasing product movement within stores, and we are optimistic about the benefits our Fast Track program will provide in the coming years.

4. Investing in our people as a competitive advantage: In 2018, we expanded our benefits to include paid parental leave, adoption assistance, and day-one access to healthcare benefits for store managers. Our investment in our employees has continued to pay dividends, and in 2018, we finished the year with our lowest store manager turnover rate on record. Being an employer of choice is a priority for us, and we will continue to seek out opportunities to enhance our employee experience.

We are very proud to continue our legacy of service. Serving our communities and helping our neighbors is the backbone of who we are. Through the end of 2018, Dollar General and its Foundations have awarded nearly $20 million to individuals and non-profit organizations to help improve the lives of people across the U.S., in the communities we call home.

I want to thank every one of our approximately 135,000 employees who work hard each day to fulfill our mission of Serving Others. I am confident that we can continue to deliver value to customers, employees and shareholders, and I am excited to see what we can accomplish in 2019.

In 2018, we kept our customer at the center of everything we do, remained focused on our operating priorities and advanced our strategic initiatives. And, we believe our customers, employees and shareholders have reaped the benefits. For our customers, we offered a shopping experience with even more value and convenience. For our employees, we provided new jobs and numerous career progression opportunities. Finally, for our shareholders, we delivered strong operating and financial results that demonstrated the strength of our business model. On the heels of a strong 2018, we look forward to continuing to build on our leading position in small-box discount retail, capturing additional market share and continuing to use innovation to support future growth. We are excited about the future.

Highlights of 2018 Compared to 2017:

• Net sales increased 9.2% to $25.6 billion and same- store sales increased 3.2%, marking our 29th consecutive year of same-store sales growth.

• Net income grew to $1.6 billion, or $5.97 per diluted share.

• Cash flows from operations were $2.1 billion, an increase of 18.9%.

• We returned $1.3 billion to our shareholders through share repurchases and dividends.

• We opened 900 new stores, remodeled 1,050 stores and relocated 115 stores.

In 2018 we relentlessly focused on execution and innovation, which resulted in continued growth. In 2019, we are piloting two new transformational strategic initiatives – DG Fresh, a multi-phase shift to self-distribution of perishable goods (primarily fresh and frozen) to our stores, and Fast Track, a two-pronged approach to increasing labor productivity in our stores and enhancing customer convenience. We expect these investments to drive sales and improve our operating margin over the long term.

We will also continue to execute on our Digital strategic initiative by using technology to further enhance the in- store experience. In addition, we intend to build on the success of our 700-store pilot of our Non-Consumables strategic initiative, which is our bold, new and expanded assortment of value-priced products in key categories, by offering the innovative product set in a total of 2,400 stores by the end of 2019.

Our goal is to sustain compelling sales growth while maintaining a disciplined approach to capital allocation, and delivering consistent, strong financial performance to our shareholders. To achieve this goal, we focus on four key operating priorities:

1. Driving profitable sales growth: We have a robust portfolio of initiatives in both consumable and non- consumable products that is driving impressive sales growth. These initiatives include our ongoing cooler

TODD J. VASOS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER April 4, 2019

TO OUR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS, CUSTOMERS & EMPLOYEES:

RESPECTFULLY,

PROXY STATEMENT & MEETING NOTICE

DEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDER,

The 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Dollar General

Corporation will be held on Wednesday, May 29, 2019, at

9:00 a.m., Central Time, at Goodlettsville City Hall

Auditorium, 105 South Main Street, Goodlettsville,

Tennessee. All shareholders of record at the close of

business on March 21, 2019 are invited to attend the annual

meeting. For security reasons, however, to gain admission to

the meeting you may be required to present photo

identification and comply with other security measures.

At this year’s meeting, you will have an opportunity to vote

on the matters described in our accompanying Notice of

Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement. Our

2018 Annual Report also accompanies this letter.

Your interest in Dollar General and your vote are very

important to us. We encourage you to read the Proxy

Statement and vote your proxy as soon as possible so your

vote can be represented at the annual meeting. You may

vote your proxy via the Internet or telephone, or if you

received a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail, you

may vote by mail by completing and returning a proxy card.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, thank you for your

continued support of Dollar General.

SINCERELY,

MICHAEL M. CALBERT CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

APRIL 4, 2019

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

DATE TIME PLACE

Wednesday May 29, 2019

9:00 a.m. Central Time

Goodlettsville City Hall Auditorium 105 South Main Street

Goodlettsville, Tennessee

ITEMS OF BUSINESS: • To elect as directors the 8 nominees listed in the proxy statement

• To hold an advisory vote to approve our named executive officer compensation as disclosed in the

proxy statement

• To ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2019

• To transact any other business that may properly come before the annual meeting and any

adjournments of that meeting

WHO MAY VOTE: Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 2019

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Goodlettsville, Tennessee

April 4, 2019

Christine L. Connolly

Corporate Secretary

Please vote your proxy as soon as possible even if you expect to attend the annual meeting in person. You may vote your proxy via the Internet or by phone by following the instructions on the notice of internet availability or proxy card, or if you received a paper copy of these proxy materials by mail, you may vote by mail by completing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed reply envelope. No postage is necessary if the proxy is mailed within the United States. You may revoke your proxy by following the instructions listed on page 2 of the proxy statement.

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in the proxy statement or about Dollar General.

This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should review all of

the information contained in the proxy statement before voting.

HOW TO VOTE (p. 2) MAIL PHONE INTERNET IN PERSON

Mail your completed,

signed, and dated

proxy card or voting

instruction form

1-800-690-6903 www.proxyvote.com May 29, 2019 9:00 a.m., CT Goodlettsville

City Hall Auditorium

105 South Main Street

Goodlettsville, TN

VOTING MATTERS (pp. 4, 45, and 47)

2019 PROPOSALS Board

Recommends

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Proposal 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation

Proposal 3: Ratification of Appointment of Auditors

BOARD OF DIRECTORS GROUP DIVERSITY(pp 4-9)

62.5% Blended

Non-Diverse

37.5% Blended Diverse

AGE

59 DIRECTOR AVERAGE

AGE

TENURE DIVERSITY (Race & Gender)

1-5

3

6-10

4

11+

1 6

YEARS AVERAGE

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

PAY FOR PERFORMANCE (pp. 20 and 21) Consistent with our philosophy,

and as illustrated to the right, a

significant portion of

annualized target total direct

compensation for our named

executive officers in 2018 was

performance-based and linked

to changes in our stock price.

CEO VARIABLE/

AT-RISK 89%

73% LTI

11% Salary

16% STI

56% LTI

25% Salary

19% STI

OTHER NEOs

(Average) VARIABLE/

AT-RISK 75%

LTI — Long-Term Equity Incentive (stock options and performance share units)

STI — Short-Term Cash Incentive (Teamshare bonus program)

96.55% SHAREHOLDER

SUPPORT

The most recent shareholder advisory vote on our

named executive officer compensation was held on

May 30, 2018. Excluding abstentions and broker non-

votes, 96.55% of total votes were cast in support of

the program.

DOLLAR GENERAL AT-A-GLANCE*

STORES15,000+

RANKING ON THE FORTUNE 500 LIST123rd

BILLION IN SALES

In fiscal year 2018

at 2018 fiscal year end

$25.6

~135,000 EMPLOYEES

MULTIPLE STORE FORMATS TO SERVE OUR CUSTOMERS OF PRODUCTS

PRICED AT $1 OR LESS~23% LOW-PRICED PRODUCT MODEL

* Data as of March 21, 2019 unless otherwise noted.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION, MEETING, AND VOTING INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

PROPOSAL 1: Election of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Compensation Discussion and Analysis . . . 19

Compensation Committee Report . . . . . . . . 28

Summary Compensation Table . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal

2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2018 Fiscal

Year-End . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

During Fiscal 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

Pension Benefits Fiscal 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Fiscal 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

Potential Payments upon Termination or

Change in Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

Compensation Committee Interlocks and

Insider Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

Compensation Risk Considerations . . . . . . . 42

Pay Ratio Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

SECURITY OWNERSHIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial

Owners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

Security Ownership of Officers and

Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership

Reporting Compliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

PROPOSAL 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

PROPOSAL 3: Ratification of Appointment of Auditors . . . . . 47

FEES PAID TO AUDITORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2020 ANNUAL MEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 29, 2019

This Proxy Statement, our 2018 Annual Report and a form of proxy card are available at www.proxyvote.com. You will need your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card to access the proxy materials.

As permitted by rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we are furnishing our proxy

materials over the Internet to some of our shareholders. This means that some shareholders will not receive paper

copies of these documents but instead will receive only a Notice of Internet Availability containing instructions on how

to access the proxy materials over the Internet and how to request a paper copy of our proxy materials, including the

Proxy Statement, our 2018 Annual Report, and a proxy card. Shareholders who do not receive a Notice of Internet

Availability will receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail, unless they have previously requested delivery of

proxy materials electronically.

PROXY STATEMENT This document is the proxy statement of Dollar General Corporation that we use to solicit your proxy to vote upon certain

matters at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Wednesday, May 29, 2019. We will begin mailing printed

copies of this document and the form of proxy or the Notice of Internet Availability to shareholders on or about April 4,

2019.

SOLICITATION, MEETING, AND VOTING INFORMATION

What is Dollar General Corporation and where is it located?

Dollar General (NYSE: DG) has been delivering value to

shoppers for nearly 80 years through its mission of

Serving Others. Dollar General helps shoppers Save time.

Save money. Every day!® by offering products that are frequently used and replenished, such as food, snacks,

health and beauty aids, cleaning supplies, basic apparel,

housewares and seasonal items at everyday low prices

in convenient neighborhood locations. Dollar General

operates 15,472 stores in 44 states as of March 1, 2019.

Our principal executive offices are located at 100

Mission Ridge, Goodlettsville, Tennessee 37072. Our

telephone number is 615-855-4000.

We refer to our company as “we,” “us” or “Dollar

General.” Unless otherwise noted or required by context,

“2019,” “2018,” “2017,” and “2016” refer to our fiscal years

ending or ended January 31, 2020, February 1, 2019,

February 2, 2018, and February 3, 2017, respectively.

What is a proxy, who is asking for it, and who is paying for the cost to solicit it?

A proxy is your legal designation of another person,

called a “proxy,” to vote your stock. The document that

designates someone as your proxy is also called a proxy

or a proxy card.

Our directors, officers, and employees are soliciting your

proxy on behalf of our Board of Directors and will not

receive additional remuneration for doing so except

reimbursement for any related out-of-pocket expenses.

We may reimburse custodians and nominees for their

expenses in sending proxy materials to beneficial

owners. Solicitation of proxies by mail may be

supplemented by telephone, email and other electronic

means, advertisements and personal solicitation, or

otherwise. Dollar General will pay all expenses of this

solicitation.

Who may attend the annual meeting?

Only shareholders, their proxy holders, and our invited

guests may attend the meeting. If your shares are

registered in the name of a broker, trust, bank, or other

nominee, you will need to bring a proxy or a letter from

that record holder or your most recent brokerage

account statement that confirms your ownership of

those shares as of March 21, 2019. For security reasons,

we also may require photo identification for admission.

Where can I find directions to the annual meeting?

Directions to Goodlettsville City Hall, where we will hold

the annual meeting, are posted on the “Investor

Information” section of our website located at

www.dollargeneral.com.

Will the annual meeting be webcast?

Yes. You are invited to visit the “News and Events—

Events and Presentations” section of the “Investor

Information” page of our website located at

www.dollargeneral.com at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, on

May 29, 2019 to access the live webcast of the annual

meeting. An archived copy of the webcast will be

available on our website for at least 60 days. The

information on our website, however, is not

incorporated by reference into, and does not form a part

of, this proxy statement.

How many votes must be present to hold the annual meeting?

A quorum, consisting of the presence in person or by

proxy of the holders of a majority of shares of our

common stock outstanding on March 21, 2019, must

exist to conduct any business at the meeting. If a

quorum is not present at the meeting, any officer

entitled to preside at or to act as Secretary of the

meeting shall have power to adjourn the meeting from

time to time until a quorum is present.

2019 Proxy Statement 1

SOLICITATION, MEETING, AND VOTING INFORMATION

What am I voting on?

You will be asked to vote on:

• the election of the 8 nominees listed in this proxy

statement;

• the approval on an advisory basis of our named

executive officer compensation as disclosed in this

proxy statement; and

• the ratification of the appointment of our independent

registered public accounting firm (the “independent

auditor”) for 2019.

We are unaware of other matters to be acted upon at

the meeting. Under Tennessee law and our governing

documents, no other non-procedural business may be

raised at the meeting unless proper notice has been

given to shareholders. If other business is properly

raised, your proxies have authority to vote as they think

best, including to adjourn the meeting.

Who is entitled to vote at the annual meeting?

You may vote if you owned shares of Dollar General

common stock at the close of business on March 21, 2019.

As of that date, there were 259,178,169 shares of Dollar

General common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

Each share is entitled to one vote on each matter.

What is the difference between a “shareholder of record” and a “street name” holder?

You are a “shareholder of record” if your shares are

registered directly in your name with EQ Shareowner

Services, our transfer agent. You are a “street name”

holder if your shares are held in the name of a brokerage

firm, bank, trust, or other nominee as custodian.

How do I vote?

If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote your

proxy over the telephone or Internet or, if you received

printed proxy materials, by marking, signing, dating, and

returning the printed proxy card in the enclosed

envelope. Please refer to the instructions on the Notice

of Internet Availability or proxy card, as applicable.

Alternatively, you may vote in person at the meeting.

If you are a street name holder, your broker, bank, or

other nominee will provide materials and instructions for

voting your shares. You may vote in person at the

meeting if you obtain and bring to the meeting a legal

proxy from your broker, banker, trustee, or other

nominee giving you the right to vote the shares.

What if I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card?

You will receive multiple Notices of Internet Availability

or proxy cards if you hold shares in different ways (e.g.,

joint tenancy, trusts, custodial accounts, etc.) or in

multiple accounts. Street name holders will receive the

Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card or other

voting information, along with voting instructions, from

their brokers. Please vote the shares represented by

each Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card you

receive to ensure that all your shares are voted.

How will my proxy be voted?

The persons named on the proxy card will vote your

proxy as you direct or, if you return a signed proxy card or

complete the Internet or telephone voting procedures but

do not specify how you want to vote your shares: “FOR”

all nominees listed in this proxy statement; “FOR”

approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our

named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy

statement pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure

rules; and “FOR” ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our

independent auditor for 2019.

Can I change my mind and revoke my proxy?

Yes. A shareholder of record may revoke a proxy given

pursuant to this solicitation by:

• signing a valid, later-dated proxy card and submitting

it so that it is received before the annual meeting in

accordance with the instructions included in the proxy

card;

• at or before the annual meeting, submitting to our

Corporate Secretary a written notice of revocation

dated later than the date of the proxy;

• submitting a later-dated vote by telephone or Internet

no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern time, on May 28, 2019;

or

• attending the annual meeting and voting in person.

Your attendance at the annual meeting, by itself, will not

revoke your proxy.

A street name holder may revoke a proxy given

pursuant to this solicitation by following the instructions

of the bank, broker, trustee, or other nominee who holds

his or her shares.

2 2019 Proxy Statement

SOLICITATION, MEETING, AND VOTING INFORMATION

How many votes are needed to elect directors?

To be elected at the annual meeting, a nominee must

receive the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast

by holders of shares entitled to vote at the meeting.

Under our Amended and Restated Charter, the

“affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast” means that

the number of votes cast in favor of a nominee’s election

exceeds the number of votes cast against his or her

election. You may vote in favor of or against the election

of each nominee, or you may elect to abstain from

voting your shares.

What happens if a director fails to receive the required vote for election?

An incumbent director who does not receive the

required vote for election at the annual meeting must

promptly tender a resignation as a director for

consideration by our Board of Directors pursuant to our

Board-approved director resignation policy outlined in

our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Each director

standing for re-election at the annual meeting has

agreed to resign, effective upon the Board’s acceptance

of such resignation, if he or she does not receive a

majority vote. If the Board rejects the offered

resignation, the director will continue to serve until the

next annual shareholders’ meeting and until his or her

successor is duly elected or his or her earlier resignation

or removal in accordance with our Bylaws. If the Board

accepts the offered resignation, the Board, in its sole

discretion, may fill the resulting vacancy or decrease the

size of the Board.

How many votes are needed to approve other matters?

The proposal to approve on an advisory basis the

compensation of our named executive officers and the

proposal to ratify the appointment of our independent

auditor for 2019 will be approved if the votes cast in

favor of the applicable proposal exceed the votes cast

against it. The vote on the compensation of our named

executive officers is advisory and, therefore, not binding

on Dollar General, our Board of Directors, or its

Compensation Committee. With respect to these

proposals, and any other matter properly brought

before the annual meeting, you may vote in favor of or

against the proposal, or you may elect to abstain from

voting your shares.

What are broker non-votes?

Although your broker is the record holder of any shares

that you hold in street name, it must vote those shares

pursuant to your instructions. If you do not provide

instructions, your broker may exercise discretionary

voting power over your shares for “routine” items but

not for “non-routine” items. All matters described in this

proxy statement, except for the ratification of the

appointment of our independent auditor, are considered

to be non-routine matters.

“Broker non-votes” occur when shares held of record by

a broker are not voted on a matter because the broker

has not received voting instructions from the beneficial

owner and either lacks or declines to exercise the

authority to vote the shares in its discretion.

How will abstentions and broker non-votes be treated?

Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will be treated

as shares that are present and entitled to vote for

purposes of determining whether a quorum is present

but will not be counted as votes cast either in favor of or

against a particular proposal and will have no effect on

the outcome of a particular proposal.

2019 Proxy Statement 3

PROPOSAL 1: Election of Directors

What is the structure of the Board of Directors?

Our Board of Directors must consist of 1 to 15 directors,

with the exact number set by the Board. The Board size

is currently fixed at 8. All directors are elected annually

by our shareholders.

How are directors identified and nominated?

The Nominating and Governance Committee (the

“Nominating Committee”) is responsible for identifying,

evaluating, and recommending director candidates,

including the director slate to be presented to

shareholders for election at the annual meeting, to our

Board of Directors, which makes the ultimate election or

nomination determination, as applicable. The Nominating

Committee may use a variety of methods to identify

potential director candidates, such as recommendations

by our directors, management, shareholders or third-

party search firms (see “Can shareholders recommend or

nominate directors?” below). The Nominating Committee

has retained a third-party search firm to assist in

identifying potential Board candidates who meet our

qualification and experience requirements and, for any

such candidate identified by such search firm, to compile

and evaluate information regarding the candidate’s

qualifications, experience, and potential conflicts of

interest, and to verify the candidate’s education.

Does the Board consider diversity when identifying director nominees?

Yes. We have a written policy to endeavor to achieve a

mix of Board members that represent a diversity of

background and experience in areas that are relevant to

our business. To implement this policy, the Nominating

Committee considers each candidate’s individual

qualifications in the context of how that candidate would

relate to the Board as a whole and is intentional about

including in the candidate pool persons with diverse

attributes such as gender, race, and age. The Committee

and the Board periodically assess this policy’s

effectiveness by considering whether the Board as a

whole represents such diverse experience and

composition and by updating the criteria for selection of

new directors as appropriate. The matrix included below

illustrates the diverse experience and composition of our

Board.

Board of Directors Matrix Total

Retail Industry Experience 7

Senior Leadership (C-Suite) Experience 8

Strategic Planning/M&A Experience 6

Public Board Experience 4

Financial Expertise 4

General Independence 7

Global/International Experience (Sourcing or Operations) 5

Branding/Marketing/Consumer Behavior Experience 5

Human Capital Experience 1

E-commerce/Digital Experience 2

Risk Management Experience 8

Racial/Gender Diversity 3

4 2019 Proxy Statement

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

How are nominees evaluated; what are the threshold qualifications?

The Nominating Committee is charged with

recommending to our Board of Directors only those

candidates that it believes are qualified to serve as

Board members consistent with the criteria for selection

of new directors adopted from time to time by the

Board and who have not achieved the age of 76, unless

the Board has approved an exception to this limit on a

case by case basis. If a waiver is granted, it will be

reviewed annually.

The Nominating Committee assesses a candidate’s

independence, background, and experience, as well as

our current Board’s skill needs. With respect to

incumbent directors considered for re-election, the

Committee also assesses each director’s meeting

attendance record and suitability for continued service.

In addition, the Committee determines that all nominees

are in a position to devote an adequate amount of time

to the effective performance of director duties and

possess the following threshold characteristics: integrity

and accountability, informed judgment, financial literacy,

a cooperative approach, a record of achievement,

loyalty, and the ability to consult with and advise

management. The Committee recommends candidates,

including those submitted by shareholders, only if it

believes a candidate’s knowledge, experience, and

expertise would strengthen the Board and that the

candidate is committed to representing the long-term

interests of all Dollar General shareholders.

Who are the nominees this year?

All nominees for election as directors at the annual

meeting, consisting of the 8 incumbent directors who

were elected at the 2018 annual meeting of

shareholders, were nominated by the Board of Directors

for election by shareholders at the annual meeting upon

the recommendation of the Nominating Committee. Our

Board believes that each of the nominees can devote an

adequate amount of time to the effective performance

of director duties and possesses all of the threshold

qualifications identified above.

If elected, each nominee would hold office until the

2020 annual meeting of shareholders and until his or her

successor is elected and qualified, subject to any earlier

resignation or removal.

The following lists the nominees, their ages at the date

of this proxy statement, and the calendar year in which

they first became a director, along with their biographies

and the experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills

that led the Board to conclude that each nominee

should serve as a director of Dollar General.

WARREN F. BRYANT

Age: 73

Director Since: 2009

Biography: Mr. Bryant served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Longs Drug Stores Corporation

from 2002 through 2008 and as its Chairman of the Board from 2003 through his retirement in 2008.

Prior to joining Longs Drug Stores, he served as a Senior Vice President of The Kroger Co. from 1999

to 2002. Mr. Bryant has served as a director of Loblaw Companies Limited of Canada since May 2013

and served as a director of OfficeMax Incorporated from 2004 to 2013 and Office Depot, Inc. from

November 2013 to July 2017.

Specific Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills: Mr. Bryant has over 40 years of retail experience, including experience in marketing,

merchandising, operations, and finance. His substantial experience in leadership and policy-

making roles at other retail companies, together with his current and former experience as a

board member for other retailers, provides him with an extensive understanding of our industry,

as well as with valuable executive management skills, global, strategic planning, and risk

management experience, and the ability to effectively advise our CEO.

2019 Proxy Statement 5

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

MICHAEL M. CALBERT

Age: 56

Director Since: 2007

Biography: Mr. Calbert has served as our Chairman of the Board since January 2016. He joined the private equity

firm KKR & Co. L.P. (“KKR”) in January 2000 and was directly involved with several KKR portfolio

companies until his retirement in January 2014. Mr. Calbert led the Retail industry team within KKR’s

Private Equity platform prior to his retirement and served as a consultant to KKR from his retirement

until June 2015. Mr. Calbert joined Randall’s Food Markets beginning in 1994 and served as the Chief

Financial Officer from 1997 until it was sold in September 1999. Mr. Calbert also previously worked as a

certified public accountant and consultant with Arthur Andersen Worldwide from 1985 to 1994, where

his primary focus was the retail and consumer industry. He previously served as our Chairman of the

Board from July 2007 until December 2008 and as our lead director from March 2013 until his

re-appointment as our Chairman of the Board in January 2016.

Specific Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills: Mr. Calbert has considerable experience in managing private equity portfolio companies and is

experienced with corporate finance and strategic business planning activities. As the former head

of KKR’s Retail industry team, Mr. Calbert has a strong background and extensive experience in

advising and managing companies in the retail industry, including evaluating business strategies,

financial plans and structures, risk, and management teams. His former service on various private

company boards in the retail industry further strengthens his knowledge and experience within

our industry. Mr. Calbert also has a significant financial and accounting background evidenced by

his prior experience as the chief financial officer of a retail company and his 10 years of practice

as a certified public accountant.

SANDRA B. COCHRAN

Age: 60

Director Since: 2012

Biography: Ms. Cochran has served as a director and as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cracker Barrel

Old Country Store, Inc., a restaurant and retail concept with locations throughout the United States,

since September 2011. She joined Cracker Barrel in April 2009 as Executive Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer, and was named President and Chief Operating Officer in November 2010. She was

previously Chief Executive Officer at Books-A-Million, Inc. from February 2004 to April 2009. She also

served as that company’s President (August 1999 – February 2004), Chief Financial Officer

(September 1993 – August 1999) and Vice President of Finance (August 1992 – September 1993).

Ms. Cochran has served as a director of Lowe’s Companies, Inc. since January 2016.

Specific Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills: Ms. Cochran brings over 25 years of retail experience to Dollar General as a result of her current

and former roles at Cracker Barrel Old Country Store and her former roles at Books-A-Million.

This experience allows her to provide additional support and perspective to our CEO and our

Board. In addition, Ms. Cochran’s industry, executive, and other public company board experience

provides leadership, consensus-building, strategic planning, risk management, and budgeting

skills. Ms. Cochran also has significant financial experience, having served as the chief financial

officer of two public companies and as vice president, corporate finance of SunTrust Securities,

Inc., and our Board has determined that she qualifies as an audit committee financial expert.

6 2019 Proxy Statement

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

PATRICIA D. FILI-KRUSHEL

Age: 65

Director Since: 2012

Biography: Ms. Fili-Krushel has served as Chief Executive Officer of the Center for Talent Innovation, a non-profit

think tank that focuses on helping global corporations leverage talent across the divides of culture,

gender, geography, and generation, since January 2019 after serving as the organization’s Interim Chief

Executive Officer since September 2018. She is the former Executive Vice President for NBCUniversal,

one of the world’s leading media and entertainment companies, where she served as a strategist and

key advisor to the CEO of NBCUniversal from April 2015 to November 2015. She served as Chairman of

NBCUniversal News Group, a division of NBCUniversal Media, LLC, composed of NBC News, CNBC and

MSNBC, from July 2012 until April 2015. She previously served as Executive Vice President of

NBCUniversal (January 2011 – July 2012) with a broad portfolio of functions reporting to her, including

operations and technical services, business strategy, human resources and legal. Prior to NBCUniversal,

Ms. Fili-Krushel was Executive Vice President of Administration at Time Warner Inc. (July 2001 –

December 2010) where her responsibilities included oversight of philanthropy, corporate social

responsibility, human resources, worldwide recruitment, employee development and growth,

compensation and benefits, and security. Before joining Time Warner in July 2001, Ms. Fili-Krushel had

been Chief Executive Officer of WebMD Health Corp. since April 2000. From July 1998 to April 2000,

Ms. Fili-Krushel was President of the ABC Television Network. Ms. Fili-Krushel has served as a director

of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. since March 2019.

Specific Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills: Ms. Fili-Krushel’s background increases the breadth of experience of our Board as a result of her

extensive executive experience overseeing the business strategy, philanthropy, corporate social

responsibility, human resources, recruitment, employee growth and development, compensation

and benefits, and legal functions, along with associated risks, at large public companies in the

media industry. She also brings valuable oversight experience in diversity-related workplace

matters from her leadership position at the Center for Talent Innovation, as well as digital and e-

commerce experience gained while serving as CEO of WebMD Health Corp. In addition, her

understanding of consumer behavior based on her knowledge of viewership patterns and

preferences provides additional perspective to our Board in understanding our customer base,

and her other public company board experience will bring additional perspective to our Board.

TIMOTHY I. MCGUIRE

Age: 58

Director Since: 2018

Biography: Mr. McGuire has served as a director and Chief Executive Officer of Mobile Service Center Canada, Ltd.

(d/b/a Mobile Klinik), a chain of professional smartphone repair stores specializing in professional

“while you wait” repair and care of smartphones and tablets, since October 2018. He also served as

Mobile Klinik’s Chairman of the Board from June 2017 until October 2018. He retired from McKinsey &

Company, a worldwide management consulting firm, in August 2017 after serving as a leader of its

global retail and consumer practice for almost 28 years, including leading the Americas retail practice

for five years. While at McKinsey, Mr. McGuire led consulting efforts with major retail,

telecommunications, consumer service, and marketing organizations in Canada, the United States, Latin

America, Europe, and Australia. He also co-founded McKinsey Analytics, a global group of consultants

bringing advanced analytics capabilities to clients to help make better business decisions. Mr. McGuire

began his career with Procter & Gamble in 1983 where he served in various positions until October

1989, with his final role being Marketing Director for the Canadian Food & Beverage division.

Specific Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills: Mr. McGuire brings almost 30 years of valuable retail experience to our company, recently as

Chief Executive Officer of Mobile Klinik and having served as a leader of McKinsey’s global retail

and consumer practice for almost 28 years. He has expertise in strategy, new store/concept

development, marketing and sales, operations, international expansion, big data and advanced

analytics, as well as risk management experience. In addition, Mr. McGuire’s focus while at

McKinsey on use of advanced analytics in retail, developing and implementing growth strategies

for consumer services, food, general-merchandise and multi-channel retailers, developing new

retail formats, the application of lean operations techniques, the redesign of merchandise flows,

supply-chain optimization efforts, and the redesign of purchasing and supplier-management

approaches, brings new and extensive relevant perspectives to our Board as it seeks to consult

and advise our CEO and to shape our corporate strategy.

2019 Proxy Statement 7

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

WILLIAM C. RHODES, III

Age: 53

Director Since: 2009

Biography: Mr. Rhodes was elected Chairman of AutoZone, Inc., a specialty retailer and distributor of automotive

replacement parts and accessories, in June 2007. He has served as President and Chief Executive

Officer and as a director of AutoZone since 2005. Prior to his appointment as President and Chief

Executive Officer, Mr. Rhodes was Executive Vice President – Store Operations and Commercial. Prior

to 2004, he had been Senior Vice President – Supply Chain and Information Technology since 2002,

and prior thereto had been Senior Vice President – Supply Chain since 2001. Prior to that time, he

served in various capacities with AutoZone since 1994, including Vice President—Stores in 2000,

Senior Vice President – Finance and Vice President – Finance in 1999, and Vice President – Operations

Analysis and Support from 1997 to 1999. Prior to 1994, Mr. Rhodes was a manager with Ernst &

Young LLP.

Specific Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills: Mr. Rhodes has nearly 25 years of experience in the retail industry, including extensive experience in

operations, supply chain, and finance, among other areas. This background serves as a strong

foundation for offering invaluable perspective and expertise to our CEO and our Board. In addition, his

experience as a board chairman and chief executive officer of a public retail company provides

leadership, consensus-building, strategic planning, and budgeting skills, as well as international

experience and an extensive understanding of both short- and long-term issues confronting the retail

industry. Mr. Rhodes also has a strong financial background, and our Board has determined that he

qualifies as an audit committee financial expert.

RALPH E. SANTANA

Age: 51

Director Since: 2018

Biography: Mr. Santana has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of Harman

International Industries, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. focused on

designing and engineering connected products and solutions for automakers, consumers and

enterprises worldwide, since April 2013, with responsibility for all aspects of Harman’s worldwide

marketing strategy. He is also responsible for Harman’s e-commerce business and runs its global

design group which entails 6 design studios around the world and full P&L accountability. Before

joining Harman, Mr. Santana served as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer, North

America, for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. from June 2010 to September 2012. In that role, he was

responsible for launching Samsung’s U.S. e-commerce business and building out branding strategies to

drive visibility. Mr. Santana also served 16 years at PepsiCo Inc. from June 1994 to May 2010, holding

positions spanning multiple international and domestic leadership roles in marketing. In his last

assignment at PepsiCo, Mr. Santana served as Vice President of Marketing, North American Beverages,

Pepsi-Cola, where he spearheaded a creative overhaul and re-launch of Pepsi-Cola. While at PepsiCo,

Inc. he also held positions with its Frito-Lay’s international and North America operations. Mr. Santana

began his career as a Senior Marketing Associate at Beverage Marketing Corporation (July 1989-June

1992).

Specific Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills: Mr. Santana has over 25 years of marketing experience spanning multiple technology and food &

beverage consumer packaged goods categories. His deep understanding of digital marketing

and retail shopper marketing, particularly in the area of consumer packaged goods, and his

extensive experience in shaping multi-cultural strategy, executing marketing programs, and

making brands culturally relevant further enhances our Board’s ability to provide oversight and

thoughtful counsel to management in these important and evolving areas of our business. His

executive position also provides risk management experience.

8 2019 Proxy Statement

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

TODD J. VASOS

Age: 57

Director Since: 2015

Biography: Mr. Vasos has served as Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board since June 2015. He joined

Dollar General in December 2008 as Executive Vice President, Division President and Chief

Merchandising Officer. He was promoted to Chief Operating Officer in November 2013. Prior to joining

Dollar General, Mr. Vasos served in executive positions with Longs Drug Stores Corporation for

seven years, including Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (February 2008 –

November 2008) and Senior Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer (2001 – 2008), where he

was responsible for all pharmacy and front-end marketing, merchandising, procurement, supply chain,

advertising, store development, store layout and space allocation, and the operation of three

distribution centers. He also previously served in leadership positions at Phar-Mor Food and Drug Inc.

and Eckerd Corporation.

Specific Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills: Mr. Vasos has extensive retail experience, including over 10 years with Dollar General. His experience

overseeing the merchandising, operations, marketing, advertising, global procurement, supply chain,

store development, store layout and space allocation functions of other retail companies bolsters

Mr. Vasos’s thorough understanding of all key areas of our business. In addition, Mr. Vasos’s service in

leadership and policy-making positions of other retail companies has provided him with the

necessary leadership skills to effectively guide and oversee the direction of Dollar General and with

the consensus-building skills required to lead our management team.

Can shareholders recommend or nominate directors?

Yes. Shareholders may recommend candidates to our

Nominating Committee by providing the same information

within the same deadlines required for nominating

candidates pursuant to the advance notice provisions in

our Bylaws discussed below. Our Nominating Committee

is required to consider such candidates and to apply the

same evaluation criteria to them as it applies to other

director candidates. Shareholders also can go a step

further and nominate directors for election by

shareholders by following the advance notice procedures

in our Bylaws summarized below.

In short, whether recommending a candidate for our

Nominating Committee’s consideration or nominating a

director for election by shareholders, a written notice

must be received by our Corporate Secretary at 100

Mission Ridge, Goodlettsville, Tennessee 37072 no

earlier and no later than the close of business on the

120th day and the 90th day, respectively, prior to (1) the

first anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting or

(2) the date of the annual meeting, if the meeting is held

more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after

the anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting,

unless the first public announcement of the annual

meeting date is less than 100 days prior to such meeting

date, in which case we must receive the notice by the

10th day following the public announcement. The notice

must contain all information required by our Bylaws

about the shareholder proposing the nominee and about

the nominee, which generally includes:

• the nominee’s name, age, business and residence

addresses, and principal occupation or employment;

• the class and number of shares of Dollar General

common stock beneficially owned by the nominee and

by the shareholder proposing the nominee;

• any other information relating to the nominee that is

required to be disclosed in proxy solicitations with

respect to nominees for election as directors pursuant

to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of

1934 (including the nominee’s written consent to

being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and

to serving as a director, if elected);

• the name and address of the shareholder proposing

the nominee as they appear on our record books, and

the name and address of the beneficial holder (if

applicable);

• any other interests of the proposing shareholder or his

or her immediate family in Dollar General securities,

including interests the value of which is based on

increases or decreases in the value of Dollar General

securities or our payment of dividends;

• a description of all compensatory arrangements or

understandings between the proposing shareholder

and each nominee; and

• a description of all arrangements or understandings

between the proposing shareholder and each nominee

and any other person pursuant to which the

nomination is to be made.

We have a “proxy access” provision in our Bylaws

whereby eligible shareholders may nominate candidates

for election to our Board and such candidates will be

2019 Proxy Statement 9

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

included in our proxy statement and ballot subject to

the terms, conditions, procedures and deadlines set

forth in Article I, Section 12 of our Bylaws. Our proxy

access bylaw provides that holders of at least 3% of our

outstanding shares, held by up to 20 shareholders,

holding the shares continuously for at least 3 years, can

nominate up to 20% of our Board for election at an

annual shareholders’ meeting. For more specific

information regarding these deadlines in respect of the

2020 annual meeting of shareholders, see “Shareholder

Proposals for 2020 Annual Meeting” below.

You should consult our Bylaws, posted on the “Investor

Information—Corporate Governance” section of our

website located at www.dollargeneral.com, for more

detailed information regarding the processes

summarized above. No shareholder nominees have been

submitted for this year’s annual meeting.

What if a nominee is unwilling or unable to serve?

That is not expected to occur. If it does, the persons

designated as proxies on the proxy card are authorized

to vote your proxy for a substitute designated by our

Board of Directors.

Are there any family relationships between any of the directors, executive officers or nominees?

There are no family relationships between any of our

directors, executive officers or nominees.

FOR The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the election of each of the 8 nominees named in this proposal.

10 2019 Proxy Statement

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE What governance practices are in place to promote effective independent Board leadership?

The Board of Directors has adopted a number of governance practices to promote effective independent Board

leadership, such as:

Independent Board Chairman Mr. Calbert, an independent director, serves as our Chairman of the Board. In this role,

Mr. Calbert serves as a liaison between the Board and our CEO, approves Board meeting

agendas, leads the annual Board self-evaluation, and participates with the Compensation

Committee in the annual CEO performance evaluation. This decision affords our CEO the

opportunity to focus his time and energy on managing our business, while our Chairman

devotes his time and attention to matters of Board oversight and governance. The Board,

however, recognizes that no single leadership model is right for all companies and at all times,

and the Board will review its leadership structure as appropriate to ensure it continues to be in

the best interests of Dollar General and our shareholders.

Annual Self-Evaluations and Board Succession Planning The Board and each standing committee annually perform self-evaluations using a process

approved by the Nominating Committee. In addition, directors are asked to provide candid

feedback on individual Board members to the Chairperson of the Nominating Committee or

the Chairman of the Board, who then meet to discuss individual director performance and

succession considerations and any necessary follow-up actions.

Regularly Scheduled Independent Director Sessions Opportunity is available at each regularly scheduled Board meeting for executive sessions of

the non-management directors (all of whom are currently independent). Mr. Calbert, as

Chairman, presides over all executive sessions of the non-management and the independent

directors.

Annual CEO Performance Evaluations Each year, the Compensation Committee meets to evaluate the CEO’s performance prior to

making CEO compensation decisions. All independent directors, including the Chairman of the

Board, are invited to provide input into this discussion.

What is the Board’s role in risk oversight?

Our Board of Directors and its committees have an

important role in our risk oversight process. We identify

and manage our key risks using our enterprise risk

management program. This framework evaluates internal

and external business, financial, legal, reputational, and

other risks, identifies mitigation strategies, and assesses

any residual risk. The program employs interviews with

senior management and our Board and reviews of

strategic initiatives, recent or potential legislative or

regulatory changes, certain internal metrics, and other

information. The Audit Committee oversees our

enterprise risk management program, reviewing

enterprise risk evaluation results at least annually and

high residual risk categories, along with their mitigation

strategies, quarterly. In addition, as part of its regular

review of progress versus the strategic plan, our Board

reviews related material risks as appropriate. Our General

Counsel also periodically provides information to the

Board regarding our insurance coverage and programs

as well as litigation and other legal risks.

In addition to consideration as part of the enterprise risk

management program, cybersecurity risk is further

evaluated through various internal cybersecurity audits

as well as periodic engagements of third parties to

perform unannounced cybersecurity assessments and to

benchmark our cybersecurity program and assess how

any identified vulnerabilities in the industry might impact

our company as well as the sufficiency of our response.

Management develops action plans to address select

identified opportunities for improvement, and the Audit

Committee quarterly reviews metrics and information

pertaining to cybersecurity risks and mitigation.

2019 Proxy Statement 11

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for

overseeing the management of risks relating to our

executive compensation program. As discussed under

“Executive Compensation—Compensation Risk

Considerations” below, the Compensation Committee

also participates in periodic assessments of the risks

relating to our overall compensation programs. In

addition, our Nominating Committee reviews detailed

information regarding corporate governance trends and

practices within our company’s industry as well as

across industries to inform governance-related

recommendations to the Board. For more information

regarding the role of each standing committee, see

“What functions are performed by the Audit,

Compensation, and Nominating Committees?” below.

The entire Board is regularly informed about risks

through the committee reporting process, as well as

through special reports and updates from management

and advisors. This enables the Board and its committees

to coordinate the risk oversight role, particularly with

respect to risk interrelationships. Our Board believes this

division of risk management responsibilities effectively

addresses the material risks facing Dollar General. Our

Board further believes that our leadership structure,

described above, supports the risk oversight function of

the Board as it allows our independent directors, through

the three fully independent Board committees and in

executive sessions of independent directors, to exercise

effective oversight of management’s actions in

identifying risks and implementing effective risk

management policies and controls.

What functions are performed by the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating Committees?

Our Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee,

Compensation Committee, and Nominating Committee,

each with a Board-adopted written charter available on

the “Investor Information—Corporate Governance” section

of our website located at www.dollargeneral.com. Current

information regarding these committees is set forth below.

In addition to the functions outlined below, each such

committee performs an annual self-evaluation, periodically

reviews and reassesses its charter, and evaluates and

makes recommendations concerning shareholder

proposals that are within the committee’s expertise.

Name of Committee & Members Committee Functions

AUDIT: Mr. Rhodes, Chairperson

Mr. Bryant

Ms. Cochran

• Selects the independent auditor

• Annually evaluates the independent auditor’s qualifications, performance, and

independence, as well as the lead audit partner; periodically considers the

advisability of audit firm rotation; and reviews the annual report on the

independent auditor’s internal quality control procedures and any material issues

raised by its most recent review of internal quality controls

• Pre-approves audit engagement fees and terms and all permitted non-audit

services and fees, and discusses the audit scope and any audit problems or

difficulties

• Sets policies regarding the hiring of current and former employees of the

independent auditor

• Discusses the annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements with

management and the independent auditor

• Reviews CEO/CFO disclosures regarding any significant deficiencies or material

weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and establishes

procedures for receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding

accounting or internal controls

• Discusses the types of information to be disclosed in earnings press releases and

provided to analysts and rating agencies

• Discusses policies governing the process by which risk assessment and risk

management are undertaken

• Reviews internal audit activities, projects and budget

• Discusses with our general counsel legal matters having an impact on financial

statements

• Furnishes the committee report required in our proxy statement

12 2019 Proxy Statement

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Name of Committee & Members Committee Functions

COMPENSATION: Ms. Fili-Krushel, Chairperson

Mr. Bryant

Mr. McGuire

• Reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to CEO

compensation

• Determines executive officer compensation (with an opportunity for the

independent directors to ratify CEO compensation) and recommends Board

compensation for Board approval

• Oversees overall compensation philosophy and principles

• Establishes short-term and long-term incentive compensation programs for

senior officers and approves all equity awards

• Oversees share ownership guidelines and holding requirements for Board

members and senior officers

• Oversees the performance evaluation process for senior officers

• Reviews and discusses disclosure regarding executive compensation, including

Compensation Discussion and Analysis and compensation tables (in addition to

preparing the report on executive compensation for our proxy statement)

• Selects and determines fees and scope of work of its compensation consultant

• Oversees and evaluates the independence of its compensation consultant and

other advisors

NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE: Ms. Cochran, Chairperson

Ms. Fili-Krushel

Mr. Rhodes

Mr. Santana

• Develops and recommends criteria for selecting new directors

• Screens and recommends to our Board individuals qualified to serve on our

Board

• Recommends Board committee structure and membership

• Recommends persons to fill Board and committee vacancies

• Develops and recommends Corporate Governance Guidelines and corporate

governance practices

• Oversees the process governing annual Board, committee and director

evaluations

Does Dollar General have an audit committee financial expert serving on its Audit Committee?

Yes. Our Board has determined that each of Ms. Cochran

and Mr. Rhodes is an audit committee financial expert

who is independent as defined in NYSE listing standards

and in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The SEC

has determined that designation as an audit committee

financial expert will not cause a person to be deemed to

be an “expert” for any purpose.

How often did the Board and its committees meet in 2018?

During 2018, our Board, Audit Committee,

Compensation Committee, and Nominating Committee

met 5, 5, 6, and 3 times, respectively. Each incumbent

director attended at least 75% of the total of all

meetings of the Board and committees on which he or

she served which were held during the period for which

he or she was a director and a member of each

applicable committee.

What is Dollar General’s policy regarding Board member attendance at the annual meeting?

Our Board of Directors has adopted a policy that all

directors should attend annual shareholders’ meetings

unless attendance is not feasible due to unavoidable

circumstances. All persons serving as Board members at

the time attended the 2018 annual shareholders’ meeting.

Does Dollar General have a management succession plan?

Yes. Our Board of Directors ensures that a formalized

process governs long-term management development

and succession. Our Board formally reviews our

management succession plan at least annually. Our

comprehensive program encompasses not only our CEO

and other executive officers but all employees through

the front-line supervisory level. The program focuses on

key succession elements, including identification of

potential successors for positions where it has been

determined that internal succession is appropriate,

2019 Proxy Statement 13

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

assessment of each potential successor’s level of

readiness, and preparation of individual growth and

development plans. With respect to CEO succession

planning, our long-term business strategy is also

considered. In addition, we maintain and review with the

Board periodically a confidential procedure for the

timely and efficient transfer of the CEO’s responsibilities

in the event of an emergency or his sudden

incapacitation or departure.

Are there share ownership guidelines and holding requirements for Board members and senior officers?

Yes. Details of our share ownership guidelines and

holding requirements for Board members and senior

officers are included in our Corporate Governance

Guidelines. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—

Share Ownership Guidelines and Holding Requirements”

and “Director Compensation” for more information on

such ownership guidelines and holding requirements.

Administrative details pertaining to these matters are

established by the Compensation Committee.

How can I communicate with the Board of Directors?

We describe our Board-approved process for security

holders and other interested parties to contact the

entire Board, a particular director, or the

non-management directors or independent directors as

a group on www.dollargeneral.com under “Investor

Information—Corporate Governance.”

Where can I find more information about Dollar General’s corporate governance practices?

Our governance-related information is posted on

www.dollargeneral.com under “Investor Information—

Corporate Governance,” including our Corporate

Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and

Ethics, the charter of each of the Audit Committee, the

Compensation Committee, and the Nominating

Committee, and the name(s) of the person(s) chosen to

lead the executive sessions of the non-management

directors and, if different, of the independent directors.

This information is available in print to any shareholder

who sends a written request to: Investor Relations,

Dollar General Corporation, 100 Mission Ridge,

Goodlettsville, Tennessee 37072.

14 2019 Proxy Statement

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION The following table and text summarize the compensation earned by or paid to each person who served as a

non-employee member of our Board of Directors during all or part of fiscal 2018. Mr. Vasos was not separately

compensated for his service on the Board, and his executive compensation is discussed under “Executive

Compensation” below. In addition, we will reimburse directors for certain fees and expenses incurred in connection

with continuing education seminars and for travel and related expenses related to Dollar General business. We have

omitted the columns pertaining to non-equity incentive plan compensation and change in pension value and

nonqualified deferred compensation earnings because they are inapplicable.

Fiscal 2018 Director Compensation

Name

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash

($)(2)

Stock Awards

($)(3)

Option Awards

($)(4)

All Other Compensation

($)(5) Total ($)

Warren F. Bryant 95,500 150,475 — 1,915 247,890

Michael M. Calbert 95,000 352,804 — 4,375 452,179

Sandra B. Cochran 112,063 150,475 — 1,915 264,453

Patricia D. Fili-Krushel 114,500 150,475 — 1,915 266,890

Timothy I. McGuire(1) 92,625 150,475 — 1,360 244,460

Paula A. Price(1) 30,638 — — 185,160 215,798

William C. Rhodes, III 112,500 150,475 — 1,915 264,890

David B. Rickard(1) 38,575 — — 185,160 223,735

Ralph E. Santana(1) 92,625 150,475 — 1,360 244,460

(1) Messrs. McGuire and Santana joined our Board on February 12, 2018. Ms. Price and Mr. Rickard served on our Board until May 30, 2018.

(2) In addition to the annual Board retainer, Messrs. Bryant, Rhodes, and Rickard and Mss. Cochran and Fili-Krushel also earned pro-rated annual

retainers for service as committee chairpersons during fiscal 2018.

(3) Represents the grant date fair value of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) awarded to Mr. Calbert on February 5, 2018 ($202,330) for his annual

Chairman of the Board retainer, as well as to each director (including Mr. Calbert) other than Ms. Price and Mr. Rickard on May 30, 2018 ($150,475),

in each case computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Information regarding assumptions made in the valuation of these awards is

included in Note 8 of the annual consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2019,

filed with the SEC on March 22, 2019 (our “2018 Form 10-K”). As of February 1, 2019, each of the persons listed in the table above had the following

total unvested RSUs outstanding (including additional unvested RSUs credited as a result of dividend equivalents earned with respect to such

RSUs): each of Messrs. Bryant, McGuire, Rhodes, and Santana and Mss. Cochran and Fili-Krushel (1,572); Mr. Calbert (3,707); and each of Ms. Price

and Mr. Rickard (0).

(4) There were no stock options awarded to any director listed in the table above during fiscal 2018, as the Board chose to eliminate stock option

awards as part of director compensation beginning in fiscal 2015. As of February 1, 2019, each of the persons listed in the table above had the

following total unexercised stock options outstanding (whether or not then exercisable): Mr. Bryant (16,207); each of Messrs. Calbert and Rhodes

(21,756); Ms. Cochran (13,120); Ms. Fili-Krushel (12,892); and each of Messrs. McGuire, Santana, and Rickard and Ms. Price (0).

(5) Represents the dollar value of dividends paid, accumulated, or credited on unvested RSUs and, for each of Ms. Price and Mr. Rickard: (a) $182,905,

which is the fair market value of the accelerated vesting of RSUs upon ceasing to serve as directors, as determined based on the closing stock

price on the vesting acceleration date, and (b) cash reimbursement of $1,700 to offset the estimated federal income tax obligation on a retirement

gift. Perquisites and personal benefits, if any, totaled less than $10,000 per director and therefore are not included in the table.

2019 Proxy Statement 15

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Each non-employee director receives payment (prorated as applicable) for a fiscal year in quarterly installments of

the following cash compensation, as applicable, along with an annual award of RSUs, payable in shares of our

common stock, under our Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (our “Stock Incentive Plan”) having the

estimated value listed below:

Fiscal Year

Board Retainer

($)

Audit Committee Chairman Retainer

($)

Compensation Committee Chairman Retainer

($)

Nominating Committee Chairman Retainer

($)

Estimated Value of Equity Award

($)

2018 95,000 25,000 20,000 17,500 150,000

The RSUs are awarded annually to each non-employee

director who is elected or re-elected at the annual

shareholders’ meeting and to any new director

appointed thereafter but before February 1 of a given

year. The RSUs are scheduled to vest on the first

anniversary of the grant date subject to certain

accelerated vesting conditions. Directors generally may

defer receipt of shares underlying the RSUs.

In addition to the fees outlined above, the Chairman of

the Board receives an annual retainer delivered in the

form of RSUs, payable in shares of our common stock

under our Stock Incentive Plan and scheduled to vest on

the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to certain

accelerated vesting conditions, having an estimated

value of $200,000.

The forms and amounts of director compensation as

outlined above were recommended by the

Compensation Committee, and approved by the Board,

after taking into account market data, recommendations

of the Committee’s compensation consultant, and, for

the additional equity award to the Chairman, his further

responsibilities to the Company.

Up to 100% of cash fees earned for Board services in a

fiscal year generally may be deferred under the

Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation

Plan. Benefits are payable upon separation from service

in the form, as elected by the director at the time of

deferral, of a lump sum distribution or monthly

payments for 5, 10, or 15 years. Participating directors

can direct the hypothetical investment of deferred fees

into funds identical to those offered in our 401(k) Plan

and will be credited with the deemed investment gains

and losses. The amount of the benefit will vary

depending on the fees the director has deferred and the

deemed investment gains and losses. Benefits upon

death are payable to the director’s named beneficiary in

a lump sum. In the event of a director’s disability (as

defined in the Non-Employee Director Deferred

Compensation Plan), the unpaid benefit will be paid in a

lump sum. Participant deferrals are not contributed to a

trust, and all benefits are paid from Dollar General’s

general assets.

Our non-employee directors are subject to share

ownership guidelines, expressed as a multiple of the

annual cash retainer payable for service on our Board,

and holding requirements. The current ownership

guideline is 5 times and should be acquired within 5

years of election to the Board. When the ownership

guideline is increased, incumbent non-employee

directors are allowed an additional year to acquire the

incremental multiple. Each non-employee director is

required to retain ownership of 50% of all net after-tax

shares granted by Dollar General until reaching the

share ownership target.

16 2019 Proxy Statement

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Is Dollar General subject to the NYSE governance rules regarding director independence?

Yes. A majority of our directors must satisfy the

independence requirements set forth in the NYSE listing

standards. The Audit Committee, the Compensation

Committee, and the Nominating Committee also must

consist solely of independent directors to comply with

NYSE listing standards and, in the case of the Audit

Committee, with SEC rules. The NYSE listing standards

define specific relationships that disqualify directors

from being independent and further require that the

Board affirmatively determine that a director has no

material relationship with Dollar General in order to be

considered “independent.” The SEC’s rules and NYSE

listing standards contain separate definitions of

independence for members of audit committees and

compensation committees, respectively.

How does the Board of Directors determine director independence?

The Board of Directors determines the independence of

each director and director nominee in accordance with

guidelines it has adopted, which include all elements of

independence set forth in the NYSE listing standards

and SEC rules as well as certain Board-adopted

categorical independence standards. These guidelines

are found in our Corporate Governance Guidelines,

which are posted on the “Investor Information—

Corporate Governance” section of our website located

at www.dollargeneral.com.

The Board first considers whether any director or

nominee has a relationship covered by the NYSE listing

standards that would prohibit an independence finding

for Board or committee purposes. The Board then

analyzes any relationship of the remaining eligible

directors and nominees with Dollar General or our

management that falls outside the parameters of the

Board’s separately adopted categorical independence

standards to determine if that relationship is material.

The Board may determine that a person who has a

relationship outside such parameters is nonetheless

independent because the relationship is not considered

to be material. Any director who has a material

relationship with Dollar General or its management is not

considered to be independent. Absent special

circumstances, the Board does not consider or analyze

any relationship that management has determined to fall

within the parameters of the Board’s separately adopted

categorical independence standards.

Are all of the directors and nominees independent?

Our CEO, Todd J. Vasos, is the only non-independent

director. Our Board has affirmatively determined that each

of Warren F. Bryant, Michael M. Calbert, Sandra B.

Cochran, Patricia D. Fili-Krushel, Timothy I. McGuire,

William C. Rhodes, III, and Ralph E. Santana, as well as

former Board members Paula A. Price and David B.

Rickard who served for part of 2018, is independent under

both the NYSE listing standards and our additional

independence standards. Except as described below, any

relationship between an independent director and Dollar

General or our management fell within the Board-adopted

categorical standards and, accordingly, was not reviewed

or considered by our Board in making independence

decisions. The Board also has determined that each

person who currently serves or who served in 2018 on the

Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the

Nominating Committee meets or met, as applicable, the

NYSE independence requirements for membership on

those committees, our additional standards and, as to the

Audit Committee, SEC rules.

In reaching the determination that Ms. Cochran is

independent, the Board considered that Ms. Cochran’s

brother has been employed by the Company since 2009

and currently serves as Vice President of Government

and Public Relations, a non-executive officer position, as

described in more detail under “Transactions with

Management and Others.” Ms. Cochran does not serve

on the Compensation Committee which approves

decisions pertaining to Mr. Brophy’s compensation, and

she does not participate in his performance evaluations.

Mr. Brophy’s cash compensation and equity awards are

approved by the Compensation Committee pursuant to

our related-party transactions approval policy.

2019 Proxy Statement 17

TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS

Does the Board of Directors have a related- party transactions approval policy?

Yes. Our Board of Directors has adopted a written policy

for the review, approval, or ratification of “related party”

transactions. A “related party” for this purpose includes

our directors, director nominees, executive officers, and

greater than 5% shareholders, and any of their

immediate family members, and a “transaction” includes

one in which (1) the total amount may exceed $120,000,

(2) Dollar General is a participant, and (3) a related party

will have a direct or indirect material interest (other than

as a director or a less than 10% owner of another entity,

or both).

The policy requires prior Board approval for known

related party transactions, subject to certain exceptions

identified below. In addition, at least annually after

receiving a list of immediate family members and

affiliates from our directors and executive officers,

relevant internal departments determine if any

transactions were unknowingly entered into with a

related party and the Board is presented with a list of

any such transactions, subject to the exceptions

identified below, for review. The related party may not

participate in any approval of the transaction and must

provide to the Board all material information concerning

the transaction.

Each of our Chairman and our CEO is authorized to

approve a related party transaction in which he is not

involved if the total anticipated amount is less than

$1 million and he informs the Board of the transaction. In

addition, the transactions below are deemed

pre-approved without Board review or approval:

• Transactions involving a total amount that does not

exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the entity’s

annual consolidated revenues (total consolidated

assets in the case of a lender) if no related party who

is an individual participates in the actual provision of

services or goods to, or negotiations with, us on the

entity’s behalf or receives special compensation or

benefit as a result.

• Charitable contributions if the total amount does not

exceed 2% of the recipient’s total annual receipts and

no related party who is an individual participates in

the grant decision or receives any special

compensation or benefit as a result.

• Transactions where the interest arises solely from share

ownership in Dollar General and all of our shareholders

receive the same benefit on a pro rata basis.

• Transactions where the rates or charges are

determined by competitive bid.

• Transactions for services as a common or contract

carrier or public utility at rates or charges fixed in

conformity with law or governmental authority.

• Transactions involving services as a bank depositary

of funds, transfer agent, registrar, trustee under a trust

indenture, or similar services.

• Compensatory transactions available on a

nondiscriminatory basis to all salaried employees

generally, ordinary course business travel expenses

and reimbursements, or compensatory arrangements

to directors, director nominees or officers or any other

related party that have been approved by the Board

or an authorized committee.

What related-party transactions existed in 2018 or are planned for 2019?

Ms. Cochran’s brother, Stephen Brophy, has been

employed by the Company since 2009. He served in a

non-officer role during substantially all of 2018 and was

promoted to Vice President of Government and Public

Relations, a non-executive officer position, effective

February 1, 2019. For 2018, Mr. Brophy earned from

Dollar General total cash compensation (comprised of

his base salary and bonus compensation) of less than

$295,000 and received an annual equity award

consisting of 1,287 non-qualified stock options and 335

RSUs. In March 2019, Mr. Brophy received an annual

equity award consisting of 1,926 non-qualified stock

options, 256 RSUs, and 256 PSUs, in each case on terms

consistent with the annual equity awards received by all

Dollar General employees at the same job grade level as

Mr. Brophy and on terms substantially similar to the

forms of award agreements on file with the SEC. We

expect Mr. Brophy’s total cash compensation for 2019 to

not exceed $335,000. Mr. Brophy also is eligible to

participate in employee benefits plans and programs

available to our other full-time employees.

Ms. Cochran does not serve on the Compensation

Committee which approves decisions pertaining to

Mr. Brophy’s compensation, and she does not participate

in his performance evaluations. Mr. Brophy’s cash

compensation and equity awards are approved by the

Compensation Committee pursuant to our related-party

transactions approval policy.

18 2019 Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION This section provides details of fiscal 2018 compensation for our named executive officers: Todd J. Vasos, Chief

Executive Officer; John W. Garratt, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Jeffery C. Owen, Executive

Vice President, Store Operations; Robert D. Ravener, Executive Vice President and Chief People Officer; and Jason S.

Reiser, Executive Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview Our executive compensation program is designed to serve the long-term interests of our shareholders. To deliver

superior shareholder returns, we believe it is critical to offer a competitive compensation package that will attract, retain,

and motivate experienced executives with the requisite expertise. Our program is designed to balance the short-term

and long-term components and thus incent achievement of our annual and long-term business strategies, to pay for

performance, and to maintain our competitive position in the market in which we compete for executive talent.

Compensation Best Practices

We strive to align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders and to follow sound corporate governance

practices.

Compensation Practice Dollar General Policy

Pay for performance A significant portion of targeted direct compensation is linked to the financial performance of key metrics. All of our annual bonus compensation and equity

incentive compensation is performance based. See “Pay for Performance.”

Robust share ownership guidelines and holding requirements

Our share ownership guidelines and holding requirements create further alignment

with shareholders’ long-term interests. See “Share Ownership Guidelines and

Holding Requirements.”

Clawback policy Beginning with the 2017 annual equity awards and Teamshare bonus program, the clawback of performance-based incentive compensation paid or awarded to a

named executive officer is allowed in the case of a material financial restatement

of our consolidated financial statements resulting from fraud or intentional

misconduct on the part of the executive officer.

No hedging or pledging Dollar General securities or holding Dollar General securities in margin accounts

Our policy prohibits executive officers and Board members from hedging their

ownership of our stock, pledging our securities as collateral, and holding our

securities in a margin account. See “Hedging and Pledging Policies.”

No excise tax gross-ups and minimal income tax gross-ups

We do not provide tax gross-up payments to named executive officers other than

on relocation-related items.

Double-trigger provisions All equity awards granted to named executive officers since March 2016 include a “double-trigger” vesting provision upon a change in control.

No repricing or cash buyout of underwater stock options without shareholder approval

Our equity incentive plan prohibits repricing underwater stock options, reducing

the exercise price of stock options or replacing awards with cash or another award

type, without shareholder approval.

Annual compensation risk assessment At least annually, our Compensation Committee assesses the risk of our compensation program.

2019 Proxy Statement 19

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Pay for Performance

Consistent with our philosophy, and as illustrated to the

right, a significant portion of annualized target total

direct compensation for our named executive officers in

2018 was performance-based and linked to changes in

our stock price.

In addition, the following financial performance was

achieved in accordance with our short-term and long-

term incentive plans:

• Teamshare Bonus Program In connection with our 2018 Teamshare bonus program,

we achieved 2018 adjusted EBIT (as defined and

calculated for purposes of the Teamshare bonus

program) of $2.189 billion, or 99.72% of the adjusted EBIT

target (see “Short-Term Cash Incentive Plan”).

• Performance Share Units The portion of the awards granted in March 2018 subject

to 2018 adjusted EBITDA performance was earned at

98.1% of target, based on achieving adjusted EBITDA of

$2.637 billion, or 99.6% of the adjusted EBITDA target,

and the portion of the awards granted in March 2017

subject to 2017-2018 adjusted ROIC performance was

earned at 152.0% of target based on achieving adjusted

ROIC of 18.44%, or 101.4% of the adjusted ROIC two-year

2017-2018 target, in each case as defined and calculated

in the PSU award agreements (see “Long-Term Equity

Incentive Program”).

LTI — Long-Term Equity Incentive

(stock options and performance share units)

STI — Short-Term Cash Incentive

(Teamshare bonus program)

CEO VARIABLE/

AT-RISK 89%

73% LTI

11% Salary

16% STI

56% LTI

25% Salary

19% STI

OTHER NEOs

(Average) VARIABLE/

AT-RISK 75%

Significant Compensation-Related Actions

The most significant recent compensation-related actions pertaining to our named executive officers include:

To further increase the focus on

multi-year performance as a

counterbalance to short-term

incentives, beginning with the

March 2018 equity grant,

one-half of the vesting of

performance share units is

based upon the achievement of

a three-year financial

performance goal.

Beginning in 2018, our annual

Teamshare bonus program

allows for the Committee to

adjust payments upward or

downward within certain

limitations depending upon the

named executive officer’s

performance rating (in prior

years, only downward

adjustments were allowed

within certain limitations).

In 2018, we entered into new

employment agreements with

our named executive officers,

each of which have a three-year

term and are subject to certain

automatic extensions. We have

employment agreements with

the named executive officers to

promote executive continuity,

aid in retention, and secure

valuable protections for Dollar

General, such as non-compete,

non-solicitation, and

confidentiality obligations, as

well as to facilitate

implementation of our clawback

policy.

20 2019 Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Shareholder Response

The most recent shareholder advisory vote on our

named executive officer compensation was held on

May 30, 2018. Excluding abstentions and broker

non-votes, 96.55% of total votes were cast in support of

the program. Because we view this outcome as

overwhelmingly supportive of our compensation policies

and practices, we do not believe the vote requires

consideration of changes to the program. Nonetheless,

because market practices and our business needs

continue to evolve, we continually evaluate our program

and make changes when warranted.

At our annual meeting of shareholders held on May 31,

2017, our shareholders expressed a preference that

advisory votes on executive compensation occur every

year. Consistent with this preference, our Board

implemented an annual advisory vote on executive

compensation until the next advisory vote on the

frequency of shareholder votes on executive

compensation, which will occur no later than our 2023

annual meeting of shareholders.

Philosophy and Objectives We strive to attract, retain, and motivate persons with

superior ability, to reward outstanding performance, and

to align the long-term interests of our named executive

officers with those of our shareholders. The material

compensation principles applicable to the compensation

of our named executive officers are outlined below:

• In determining total compensation, we consider a

reasonable range of the median of total compensation

of comparable positions at companies within our peer

group, while accounting for distinct circumstances not

reflected in the market data such as unique job

descriptions as well as our particular niche in the retail

sector and the impact that a particular officer may

have on our ability to meet business objectives. For

competitive or other reasons, our levels of total

compensation or any component of compensation

may exceed or be below the median range of our peer

group.

• We set base salaries to reflect the responsibilities,

experience, performance, and contributions of the

named executive officers and the salaries for

comparable positions, while maintaining an

appropriate balance between base salary and

incentive compensation.

• We reward named executive officers who enhance our

performance by linking cash and equity incentives to

the achievement of our financial goals.

• We promote share ownership to align the interests of

our named executive officers with those of our

shareholders.

• In approving compensation arrangements, we

consider recent compensation history, including

special or unusual compensation payments.

Oversight and Process

Oversight

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors,

or a subcommittee thereof, in each case consisting

entirely of independent directors, determines and

approves the compensation of our named executive

officers. Throughout this “Compensation Discussion and

Analysis” section, the use of the term compensation

committee means either the entire committee or a

subcommittee thereof, as applicable. The independent

members of our Board are provided the opportunity to

ratify the Committee’s determinations pertaining to the

level of CEO compensation.

Use of Outside Advisors

The Compensation Committee has selected Pearl Meyer

to serve as its compensation consultant and has

determined that Pearl Meyer is independent and that its

work has not raised any conflicts of interest. When

requested by the Committee, a Pearl Meyer

representative attends Committee meetings and

participates in private sessions with the Committee, and

Committee members are free to consult directly with

Pearl Meyer as desired.

The Committee (or its Chairman) determines the scope of

Pearl Meyer’s services and has approved a written

agreement that details the terms under which Pearl Meyer

will provide independent advice to the Committee. The

approved scope of Pearl Meyer’s work generally includes

the performance of analyses and provision of independent

advice related to our executive and non-employee

director compensation programs and related matters in

support of the Committee’s decisions, and more

specifically, includes performing preparation work

associated with Committee meetings, providing advice in

areas such as compensation philosophy, compensation

risk assessment, peer group, incentive plan design,

executive compensation disclosure, emerging best

practices and changes in the regulatory environment, and

providing competitive market studies. Pearl Meyer, along

with management, also prepares market data for

consideration by the Committee in making decisions on

items such as base salary, the Teamshare bonus program,

and the long-term incentive program.

2019 Proxy Statement 21

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Management’s Role

Our executive management team prepares and

recommends our annual financial plan to our Board of

Directors for approval and establishes a 3-year financial

plan. The financial performance targets used in our

incentive compensation programs typically are derived

from such financial plans, with assistance from our CFO

and members of our finance department, and are

approved by our Compensation Committee. Messrs.

Vasos and Ravener and non-executive members of the

human resources group provide assistance to the

Compensation Committee and Pearl Meyer regarding

executive compensation matters, including conducting

research, compiling data and/or making

recommendations regarding compensation amount,

compensation mix, incentive program structure

alternatives, peer group composition, and

compensation-related governance practices, as well as

providing information to and coordinating with Pearl

Meyer as requested. Additionally, Rhonda Taylor,

Executive Vice President and General Counsel, may

provide legal advice to the Committee regarding

executive compensation and related governance and

legal matters and contractual arrangements from time

to time. Although these recommendations may impact

each of such officers’ compensation to the extent they

participate in the plans and programs, none of such

officers make recommendations to the Committee

regarding their specific compensation. For the role of

management in named executive officers’ performance

evaluations, see “Use of Performance Evaluations”

below. Although the Committee values and solicits

management’s input, it retains and exercises sole

authority to make decisions regarding named executive

officer compensation.

Use of Performance Evaluations

The Compensation Committee, together with the

Chairman of the Board, assesses the performance of the

CEO, and the CEO evaluates and reports to the

Committee on the performance of each of the other

named executive officers, in each case versus previously

established goals. The Committee also has input into

each named executive officer’s performance evaluation.

These evaluations are subjective; no objective criteria or

relative weighting is assigned to any individual goal or

factor.

Performance ratings serve as an eligibility threshold for

base salary increases and directly impact the amount of

a named executive officer’s annual base salary increase.

The Committee starts with the percentage base salary

increase that equals the overall budgeted increase for

our U.S.-based employee population and approves

differing merit increases to base salary based upon each

named executive officer’s individual performance rating.

The Committee then considers whether additional

adjustments are necessary to reflect performance,

responsibilities or qualifications; to bring pay within a

reasonable range of the peer group; due to a change in

role or duties; to achieve a better balance between base

salary and incentive compensation; or for other reasons

the Committee believes justify a variance from the merit

increase.

Performance evaluation results have the potential to

affect the amount of Teamshare bonus payout because

the Committee is allowed to adjust payments upward or

downward within certain limitations depending upon the

named executive officer’s performance rating.

An unsatisfactory performance rating will reduce the

number of, or completely eliminate, stock options

awarded to the named executive officer in the following

year. None of the named executive officers received an

unsatisfactory performance rating for 2017 or 2018. In

addition, to allow for differentiation among performance

levels of the named executive officers, individual

performance, along with other factors including

company performance, department performance,

retention, and succession, are used as part of a

subjective assessment to determine whether each

named executive officer’s equity award value should be

increased or decreased from the baseline target that is

derived from market data.

Use of Market Data

The Compensation Committee approves, periodically

reviews, and utilizes a peer group when making

compensation decisions (see “Philosophy and

Objectives”). The peer group data typically is considered

annually for base salary adjustments, target equity

award values, Teamshare target bonus opportunities,

and total direct compensation, and periodically when

considering structural changes to our executive

compensation program.

22 2019 Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Our peer group consists of companies selected according to their similarity to our operations, services, revenues,

markets, availability of information, and any other information the Committee deems appropriate. Such companies

are likely to have executive positions comparable in breadth, complexity, and scope of responsibility to ours. Thus,

our peer group for 2018 compensation decisions consisted of:

Aramark Dollar Tree Rite Aid Sysco

AutoZone Kohl’s Ross Stores TJX Companies

Bed, Bath & Beyond L Brands Staples Tractor Supply

Best Buy Office Depot Starbucks Yum! Brands

Dicks Sporting Goods

Pearl Meyer annually provides market data for the CEO,

to ensure that the Committee is aware of any significant

movement in CEO compensation levels within the peer

group, and biennially for each named executive officer

position below CEO. In alternating years, the Committee

uses the prior year data for non-CEO compensation

decisions after applying an aging factor recommended

by Pearl Meyer. Thus, for 2018 non-CEO compensation

decisions, the Committee considered data provided by

Pearl Meyer from the peer group for 2017 compensation

decisions, but aged by 3% as recommended by Pearl

Meyer as aligning with market practices.

The Committee most recently updated our peer group

in May 2018 in order to improve its industry and size

comparability, but this new peer group was not used for

any 2018 compensation decisions.

Elements of Named Executive Officer Compensation We provide compensation in the form of base salary,

short-term cash incentives, long-term equity incentives,

benefits, and limited perquisites. We believe each of

these elements is a necessary component of the total

compensation package and is consistent with

compensation programs at companies with whom we

compete both for business and talent.

Mr. Vasos’s 2018 Compensation Generally

The Compensation Committee considered the base

salary, short-term incentive, and long-term incentive

components of Mr. Vasos’s compensation, as well as his

total compensation, in each case in comparison to the

peer group (see “Use of Market Data”). After considering

the peer group market data, as well as Mr. Vasos’s and

the Company’s fiscal 2017 performance (see “Use of

Performance Evaluations”), Mr. Vasos’s experience and

tenure in the CEO role, and the Committee’s desire to

further align Mr. Vasos’s interests with shareholders and

long-term value creation, the Committee determined to

increase Mr. Vasos’s 2018 target equity grant value and

base salary and to make no change to his target short-

term incentive bonus percentage opportunity from 2017.

The Committee believed that such actions placed each

component of Mr. Vasos’s 2018 compensation as well as

his 2018 total target compensation within a reasonable

range of the median of the peer group data.

2018 Compensation of Named Executive Officers Other than Mr. Vasos Generally

The Compensation Committee considered the base salary,

short-term incentive, and long-term incentive

components, and total compensation of the non-CEO

named executive officers, in each case in comparison to

the peer group (see “Use of Market Data”), as well as each

such officer’s performance (see “Use of Performance

Evaluations”). The Committee approved base salary merit

increases in accordance with each such officer’s 2017

performance rating within the limitations of the overall U.S.

merit budget increase for 2018 of 3.0%, and after

reviewing the proposed total target compensation,

excluding the long-term incentive grant value adjustments

based on performance, of each such officer against the

peer group data, the Committee determined that total

compensation for each such officer other than Mr. Garratt

remained within a reasonable range of the peer group

median and reflected the responsibilities of the position

and the experience and contributions of the individual.

The Committee approved an additional base salary

adjustment for Mr. Garratt to better reflect the

responsibilities of his position, experience and

contributions, and to more closely align his total target

compensation with the peer group median. For each

non-CEO named executive officer, the Committee made

no change from the prior year’s short-term incentive

target percentage of base salary, which remained

reasonably aligned with the peer group market data, or to

the prior year’s long-term incentive grant value target,

before adjustments based on individual performance, in

light of our established process of obtaining new market

data every two years. However, in order to allow for

differentiation among individual performance levels of

such officers, the Committee approved adjustments to the

$1.5 million target long-term incentive grant value based

on each such officer’s subjective performance evaluation

results which took into account a variety of factors,

including company performance, department

performance, individual performance, retention, and

succession (see “Use of Performance Evaluations”).

2019 Proxy Statement 23

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Base Salary

Base salary promotes our recruiting and retention

objectives by reflecting the salaries for comparable

positions in the competitive marketplace, rewarding

strong performance, and providing a stable and

predictable income source for our executives. Our

employment agreements set forth minimum base salary

levels, which the Compensation Committee retains sole

discretion to increase from time to time. The Committee

routinely considers annual base salary adjustments in

March.

(a) Salary Adjustment for Mr. Vasos

For the reasons outlined above under “Mr. Vasos’s 2018

Compensation Generally,” the Compensation Committee

approved a base salary of $1,200,000 for Mr. Vasos

effective April 1, 2018, representing a 5.91% increase from

his prior year’s base salary.

(b) Salary Adjustments for Named Executive

Officers Other than Mr. Vasos

For the reasons outlined above under “2018

Compensation of Named Executive Officers Other than

Mr. Vasos Generally,” the Compensation Committee

approved the following base salary increases effective

April 1, 2018: Mr. Garratt, 18.10%; each of Messrs. Owen

and Ravener, 3.67%; and Mr. Reiser, 2.67% (see “Use of

Performance Evaluations” and “Use of Market Data”).

Short-Term Cash Incentive Plan

Our short-term cash incentive plan, called Teamshare,

provides an opportunity to receive a cash bonus

payment equal to a certain percentage of base salary

based upon Dollar General’s achievement of one or

more pre-established financial performance targets.

Accordingly, Teamshare fulfills an important part of our

pay for performance philosophy while aligning the

interests of our named executive officers and our

shareholders.

(a) 2018 Teamshare Structure

The Compensation Committee uses adjusted EBIT as the

Teamshare financial performance measure because it is

a comprehensive measure of corporate performance

that the Committee believes aligns with our

shareholders’ interests. For purposes of the 2018

Teamshare program, adjusted EBIT is defined as our

operating profit as calculated in accordance with U.S.

generally accepted accounting principles, but excludes

the impact of (a) costs, fees and expenses directly

related to the consideration, negotiation, preparation, or

consummation of any transaction that results in a

Change in Control (within the meaning of our Stock

Incentive Plan) or to any securities offering; (b) disaster-

related charges; (c) gains or losses associated with our

LIFO computation; and (d) unless the Committee

disallows any such item, (i) any unbudgeted loss as a

result of the resolution of a legal matter or (ii) any

unplanned loss(es) or gain(s) related to the

implementation of accounting or tax legislative changes

or (iii) any unplanned loss(es) or gain(s) of a

non-recurring nature, provided that in the case of each

of (i), (ii) and (iii) such amount equals or exceeds

$1 million for a single loss or gain, as applicable, and

$10 million in the aggregate.

The Committee set the 2018 adjusted EBIT performance

goal at approximately $2.195 billion, which was the

adjusted EBIT target amount set forth in our 2018 annual

financial plan previously approved by our Board of

Directors. The Committee retained the threshold (below

which no bonus may be earned) and maximum (above

which no further bonus may be earned) performance

levels at 90% and 120% of the target level, respectively,

as they appropriately align pay and performance and

are reasonably consistent with the practices of our peer

group. Payouts for financial performance are based on

actual results and are interpolated on a straight-line

basis between threshold and target and between target

and maximum.

The bonus payable to each named executive officer

upon achieving the target level of financial performance

is equal to the applicable percentage of base salary

shown in the table below, subject to the Committee’s

exercise of discretion based on the individual’s

performance (see “Use of Performance Evaluations”).

These percentages for each named executive officer

remained the same as those in effect at the end of the

prior year for the reasons outlined under “Mr. Vasos’s

2018 Compensation Generally” and “2018 Compensation

of Named Executive Officers Other than Mr. Vasos

Generally.”

Name Target % of Base Salary*

Mr. Vasos 150

All other named executive officers 75

* Payout percentages at the threshold and maximum performance

levels are calculated at 50% and 300%, respectively, of the

applicable target percentage of base salary.

(b) 2018 Teamshare Results

The Compensation Committee certified the adjusted

EBIT performance result at $2.189 billion (99.72% of the

adjusted EBIT target) which, after applying negative

discretion as allowed by the Teamshare program (see

24 2019 Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

“Use of Performance Evaluations”), resulted in 2018

Teamshare payouts to each of the named executive

officers of 95.39% of the target percentages set forth in

the table above. Such amounts are reflected in the

“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of

the Summary Compensation Table.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Program

Long-term equity incentives are an important part of

our pay for performance philosophy and are designed to

motivate named executive officers to focus on long-

term success for shareholders while rewarding them for

a long-term commitment to us. The Compensation

Committee considers annual equity awards each March

at its regular quarterly meeting and considers special

equity awards as necessary in connection with one-time

events such as a new hire, promotion, or special

performance. Equity awards are made under our

shareholder-approved Stock Incentive Plan.

(a) 2018 Equity Award for Mr. Vasos

For the reasons outlined under “Mr. Vasos’s 2018

Compensation Generally,” the Compensation Committee

established an $8.0 million target grant value for

Mr. Vasos’s 2018 equity award. The Committee further

determined to deliver Mr. Vasos’s annual equity award

via a mix of 50% stock options and 50% PSUs to incent

a long-term focus and to align the interests of

management with those of shareholders, and the

Committee approved the award in accordance with the

terms outlined in “2018 Annual Equity Awards for

Named Executive Officers Other than Mr. Vasos” below.

(b) 2018 Annual Equity Awards for Named

Executive Officers Other than Mr. Vasos

Each year, the Compensation Committee determines a

targeted equity award value for each named executive

officer derived from market data information and the

appropriate mix of vehicles in which to deliver such

targeted value (see “Use of Market Data”), but then

adjusts that value up or down based on a subjective

assessment of a variety of factors as outlined above

under “Use of Performance Evaluations”. In 2018, the

equity mix was delivered 50% in options and 50% in

PSUs, as the Committee believed that this mix remained

appropriate to incent a long-term focus and to align the

interests of management with those of shareholders. For

the reasons outlined above in “2018 Compensation of

Named Executive Officers Other than Mr. Vasos

Generally,” the grant value target for each such officer,

before adjustments based on individual performance,

was $1.5 million, and then the Committee approved

individual adjustments to the $1.5 million target (see

“Use of Performance Evaluations”). As a result, the

non-CEO named executive officers received the

following targeted grant values: Mr. Garratt

($1.4 million), each of Messrs. Owen and Ravener

($1.5 million), and Mr. Reiser ($1.3 million).

The options are granted with a per share exercise price

equal to the fair market value of one share of our

common stock on the grant date. The options vest 25%

annually on April 1 of each of the four fiscal years

following the fiscal year in which the grant is made,

subject to the named executive officer’s continued

employment with us and certain accelerated vesting

provisions, and have a term of ten years. The PSUs can

be earned if specified performance goals are achieved

during the applicable performance periods and if certain

additional vesting requirements are met as discussed

more specifically below.

For PSUs the Committee selects and sets targets for

financial performance measures, then establishes

threshold and maximum levels of performance derived

from those targets. The number of PSUs earned

depends on the level of financial performance achieved

versus the goals. The Committee selected adjusted

EBITDA and adjusted ROIC as the financial performance

measures for the 2018 PSUs. Half of the award is subject

to adjusted EBITDA performance and half of the award

is subject to adjusted ROIC performance. The

Committee believes that these financial measures and

the mix between them appropriately balance the

emphasis placed upon earnings performance as well as

rigorous capital management over the long-term.

For the 2018 PSU awards, a one-year performance period

corresponding to our 2018 fiscal year was established for

the PSUs which are subject to the adjusted EBITDA

performance measure. The adjusted EBITDA performance

goal of approximately $2.647 billion was the target

amount set forth in our 2018 annual financial plan

previously approved by our Board of Directors. In order to

further increase the focus on multi-year performance as a

counterbalance to short-term incentives, the PSUs which

are subject to the adjusted ROIC performance measure

are subject to a three-year performance period beginning

the first day of our 2018 fiscal year and extending through

the last day of our 2020 fiscal year. The adjusted ROIC

performance goal of 19.30% is the average of the adjusted

ROIC goals for each fiscal year within the performance

period as set forth in our three-year financial plan as it

existed at the time the PSUs were awarded.

Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as income (loss) from

continuing operations before cumulative effect of

change in accounting principles plus interest and other

financing costs, net, provision for income taxes, and

depreciation and amortization, but excludes the impact

of all items excluded from the 2018 Teamshare program

adjusted EBIT calculation outlined above.

2019 Proxy Statement 25

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Adjusted ROIC for the three-year performance period is

calculated as (a) the result of (x) the sum of (i) our

operating income, plus (ii) depreciation and

amortization, plus (iii) minimum rentals for 2018 and

single lease cost for 2019 and 2020, minus (y) taxes,

divided by (b) the result of (x) the sum of the averages

of: (i) total assets, excluding any assets associated with

the adoption of new lease accounting standards in 2019,

plus (ii) accumulated depreciation and amortization,

minus (y) (i) cash, minus (ii) goodwill, minus

(iii) accounts payable, minus (iv) other payables, minus

(v) accrued liabilities, plus (vi) 8x minimum rentals for

2018 and 8x single lease cost for 2019 and 2020 (with all

of the foregoing terms determined per our financial

statements for each fiscal year within the performance

period) but excludes the impact of all items excluded

from the 2018 Teamshare program adjusted EBIT

calculation outlined above.

The following tables show the amount (as a percent of

target) of such PSUs that could be earned at each of the

threshold, target, and maximum performance levels for

each applicable performance period, as well as the 2018

adjusted EBITDA performance result and the number of

PSUs earned by each named executive officer as a result

of such performance.

Adjusted EBITDA (2018)

Level* Result v.

Target (%)

EBITDA Result ($)

(in billions) PSUs Earned (% of Target)

Below Threshold <90 <2.383 0

Threshold 90 2.383 50

Target 100 2.647 100

Maximum 120 3.177 300

2018 Results 99.6 2.637 98.1

* PSUs earned for performance between threshold, target, and maximum levels are interpolated in a manner similar to that used for our 2018

Teamshare bonus program.

Name 2018 PSUs Earned (Adjusted EBITDA)

Mr. Vasos 20,073

Mr. Garratt 3,513

Mr. Owen 3,764

Mr. Ravener 3,764

Mr. Reiser 3,262

Adjusted ROIC (2018-2020)

Level* Result v.

Target (%) ROIC

Result (%) PSUs Earned

(% of Target)

Below Threshold <94.8 <18.30 0

Threshold 94.8 18.30 50

Target 100.0 19.30 100

Maximum 105.2 20.30 300

* PSUs earned for performance between threshold, target, and maximum levels are interpolated in a manner similar to that used for our 2018

Teamshare bonus program.

The PSUs earned by each named executive officer for

fiscal 2018 adjusted EBITDA performance will vest in

equal one-third installments on April 1, 2019, April 1,

2020, and April 1, 2021, subject to such officer’s

continued employment with us and certain accelerated

vesting provisions. Subject to certain pro-rata vesting

conditions, the PSUs earned, if any, by each named

executive officer for adjusted ROIC performance during

the three-year performance period will vest on April 1,

2021, subject to such officer’s continued employment

with us and certain accelerated vesting provisions. All

vested PSUs will be settled in shares of our common

stock.

26 2019 Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(c) 2017 PSU Awards – Completed 2017-2018

Performance Period

Certain of the PSUs awarded in 2017 were subject to an

adjusted ROIC performance measure for a two-year

performance period beginning on the first day of our

2017 fiscal year and extending through the last day of

our 2018 fiscal year, based on the average adjusted

ROIC for each fiscal year within the two-year period. The

average adjusted ROIC was derived from our three-year

financial plan in place at the time of the award and

generally is defined in the same way as adjusted ROIC

for the 2018 PSU awards except that it does not exclude

unplanned loss(es) or gain(s) related to the

implementation of accounting or tax legislative changes.

The following tables show the amount (as a percent of

target) of such PSUs that could be earned at each of the

applicable threshold, target and maximum performance

levels, as well as the actual performance result and the

number of such PSUs earned by each named executive

officer who received a 2017 PSU award. When

calculating the performance result, the Committee

exercised negative discretion to adjust ROIC for the

material positive impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

driven by both the benefit associated with the

remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities in

2017 and for the ongoing federal corporate tax rate

reduction in 2017 and 2018.

Adjusted ROIC (2017-2018)

Level* Result v.

Target (%) ROIC

Result (%) PSUs Earned (% of Target)

Below Threshold <94.5 <17.18 0

Threshold 94.5 17.18 50

Target 100.0 18.18 100

Maximum 105.5 19.18 300

2017-2018 Results 101.4 18.44 152.0

* PSUs earned for performance between threshold, target, and maximum levels are interpolated in a manner similar to that used for our 2018

Teamshare bonus program.

Name 2017-2018 PSUs Earned (Adjusted ROIC)

Mr. Vasos 10,207

Mr. Garratt 2,380

Mr. Owen 2,380

Mr. Ravener 2,551

(d) Share Ownership Guidelines and Holding Requirements

Our senior officers are subject to share ownership guidelines and holding requirements. The share ownership guideline

is a multiple of annual base salary as in effect from time to time and is to be achieved within a five-year time period.

Officer Level Multiple of Base Salary

CEO 6X

EVP 3X

SVP 2X

Each senior officer is required to retain ownership of

50% of all net after-tax shares issuable upon vesting or

exercise of compensatory awards until the target

ownership level is achieved.

(e) Hedging and Pledging Policies

Our policy prohibits Board members and executive

officers from (1) pledging Dollar General securities as

collateral, (2) holding Dollar General securities in a

margin account, and (3) hedging against any decrease in

the market value of equity securities issued by Dollar

General and held by them, such as entering into or

trading prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps,

collars, puts, calls, options, exchange funds or other

derivative instruments related to Dollar General stock.

Benefits and Perquisites

Our named executive officers participate in certain

benefits on the same terms that are offered to all of our

2019 Proxy Statement 27

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

salaried employees. We also provide them with limited

additional benefits and perquisites for retention and

recruiting purposes, to replace benefit opportunities lost

due to regulatory limits, and to enhance their ability to

focus on our business. We do not provide tax gross-up

payments for named executive officers on any benefits

and perquisites other than relocation-related items. The

primary additional benefits and perquisites include the

following:

• We provide a compensation deferral plan (the “CDP”)

as discussed in more detail under “Nonqualified

Deferred Compensation Fiscal 2018”.

• We pay the premiums for a life insurance benefit equal

to 2.5 times base salary up to a maximum of

$4 million.

• We provide a salary continuation program that

provides income replacement for up to 26 weeks at

100% of base salary for the first three weeks and 70%

of base salary thereafter. In addition to the income

replacement benefit, we pay administrative fees

associated with the program. We also pay the

premiums under a group long-term disability plan that

provides 60% of base salary up to a maximum

monthly benefit of $20,000.

• We provide a relocation assistance program under a

policy applicable to officer-level employees.

• We provide personal financial and estate planning and

tax preparation services through a third party.

Severance Arrangements

As noted above, we have an employment agreement

with each of our named executive officers that, among

other things, provides for such executive’s rights upon a

termination of employment in exchange for valuable

business protection provisions for us. We believe that

reasonable severance benefits are appropriate to

protect the named executive officer against

circumstances over which he does not have control and

as consideration for the promises of non-disclosure,

non-competition, non-solicitation, and non-interference,

as well as the clawback rights that we require in our

employment agreements. A change in control, by itself

(“single trigger”), does not trigger any severance

provision applicable to our named executive officers,

except for the provisions related to outstanding equity

awards granted prior to 2016. Equity awards granted in

or after 2016 do not provide for single trigger vesting

acceleration but rather require a termination event

within a certain period of time following a change in

control to accelerate vesting of such equity awards.

Considerations Associated with Regulatory Requirements Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, we

generally may not take a tax deduction for individual

compensation over $1 million paid in any taxable year to

each of the persons that meet the definition of a

covered employee under Section 162(m). For fiscal 2018,

covered employees include anyone who was a covered

employee for any taxable year beginning after

December 31, 2016, anyone who held the position of

CEO or Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) at any time

during the fiscal year and the three most highly

compensated employees who acted as executive

officers (other than as CEO or CFO) at any time during

the fiscal year. Prior to U.S. tax law changes in 2017,

certain performance-based compensation was exempt

from the Section 162(m) deduction limit. However, for

tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the

performance-based compensation exemption was

eliminated unless the compensation qualifies for

transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in

place as of November 2, 2017.

The Compensation Committee continues to view the tax

deductibility of executive compensation as one of many

factors to be considered in the context of its overall

compensation philosophy and therefore reserves the

right to approve compensation that may not be

deductible in situations it deems appropriate.

Compensation Committee Report The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors

reviewed and discussed with management the

Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by

Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K and, based on such

review and discussions, the Compensation Committee

recommended to the Board that the Compensation

Discussion and Analysis be included in this document.

This report has been furnished by the members of the

Compensation Committee:

• Patricia D. Fili-Krushel, Chairperson

• Warren F. Bryant

• Timothy I. McGuire

The above Compensation Committee Report does not

constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed

filed or incorporated by reference into any other Dollar

General filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent

Dollar General specifically incorporates this report by

reference therein.

28 2019 Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table The following table summarizes compensation paid to or earned by our named executive officers in each of the 2018,

2017, and 2016 fiscal years. We have omitted from this table the columns for “Bonus” and “Change in Pension Value

and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” because they are inapplicable.

Name and Principal Position(1) Year Salary ($)(2)

Stock Awards

($)(3)

Option Awards

($)(4)

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

($)(5)

All Other Compensation

($)(6) Total ($)

Todd J. Vasos,

Chief Executive Officer

2018 1,188,879 3,805,114 3,793,604 1,717,068 97,852 10,602,517

2017 1,127,543 2,847,697 2,827,461 1,921,028 82,680 8,806,409

2016 1,083,375 2,317,164 4,194,777 915,411 82,561 8,593,288

John W. Garratt,

Executive Vice President &

Chief Financial Officer

2018 706,511 665,923 663,893 518,698 63,316 2,618,341

2017 597,256 664,463 659,739 520,441 60,636 2,502,535

2016 511,603 637,226 655,955 277,981 47,247 2,130,012

Jeffery C. Owen,

Executive Vice President,

Store Operations

2018 652,662 713,436 711,314 469,697 60,267 2,607,376

2017 630,529 664,463 659,739 536,861 64,747 2,556,339

2016 613,924 637,226 655,955 333,578 55,863 2,296,546

Robert D. Ravener,

Executive Vice President &

Chief People Officer

2018 578,875 713,436 711,314 416,595 57,157 2,477,377

2017 558,365 711,960 706,865 476,167 58,040 2,511,397

2016 538,841 637,226 655,955 293,012 50,734 2,175,768

Jason S. Reiser,

Executive Vice President &

Chief Merchandising Officer

2018 664,488 618,317 616,472 477,456 168,661 2,545,394

(1) Mr. Reiser joined Dollar General in July 2017 but was not a named executive officer for 2017.

(2) Each named executive officer deferred under the CDP and contributed to our 401(k) Plan a portion of salary earned in each of the fiscal years for

which salaries are reported above for the applicable named executive officer. The amounts of the fiscal 2018 salary deferrals under the CDP are

included in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table.

(3) The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of PSUs awarded in each fiscal year for which compensation is required to be

reported in the table for each named executive officer, in each case computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The PSUs are subject to

performance conditions, and the reported value at the grant date is based upon the probable outcome of such conditions on such date. The values

of the PSUs at the grant date assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved are as follows for each fiscal year

required to be reported for each applicable named executive officer:

Fiscal Year

Mr. Vasos ($)

Mr. Garratt ($)

Mr. Owen ($)

Mr. Ravener ($)

Mr. Reiser ($)

2018 11,415,341 1,997,768 2,140,307 2,140,307 1,854,951

2017 8,543,092 1,993,388 1,993,388 2,135,879 —

2016 6,951,492 1,911,679 1,911,679 1,911,679 —

Information regarding the assumptions made in the valuation of these awards is set forth in Note 8 of the annual consolidated financial statements

in our 2018 Form 10-K.

(4) The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options awarded in each fiscal year for which compensation is

required to be reported in the table for each named executive officer, in each case computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Information

regarding assumptions made in the valuation of these awards is set forth in Note 8 of the annual consolidated financial statements in our 2018

Form 10-K.

(5) Represents amounts earned pursuant to our Teamshare bonus program for each fiscal year reported. See the discussion of the “Short-Term Cash

Incentive Plan” in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above. Messrs. Vasos, Garratt and Reiser deferred 5%, 5% and 7%, respectively, of his

fiscal 2018 Teamshare bonus payment reported above under the CDP. Mr. Vasos deferred 5% of his fiscal 2017 Teamshare bonus payment reported

above under the CDP. Messrs. Vasos and Garratt each deferred 5% of his fiscal 2016 Teamshare bonus payment reported above under the CDP.

2019 Proxy Statement 29

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(6) Includes the following amounts for each named executive officer:

Name

Company Match Contributions–

CDP ($)

Company Match Contributions–

401(k) ($)

Premiums for Life Insurance

Program ($)

Tax Gross-Ups Related to Relocation

($)

Aggregate Incremental Cost of Providing

Perquisites/Personal Benefits*

($)

Mr. Vasos 45,665 14,015 2,491 — 35,681

Mr. Garratt 21,363 14,190 1,488 — 26,275

Mr. Owen 19,036 13,842 1,368 — 26,021

Mr. Ravener 15,358 13,832 1,213 — 26,754

Mr. Reiser 22,101 10,567 1,392 5,645 128,956

* Except for Mr. Reiser, whose aggregate incremental cost of providing perquisites and personal benefits included $106,290 for costs associated

with relocation, none of the named executive officers received any perquisite or personal benefit for which the aggregate incremental cost

individually equaled or exceeded the greater of $25,000 or 10% of total perquisites. The aggregate incremental cost of providing perquisites

and personal benefits related to: (1) for each named executive officer, financial and estate planning services, entertainment events,

miscellaneous gifts, premiums paid under our group long-term disability program and our accidental death and dismemberment policy, and an

administrative fee for coverage under our short-term disability program; (2) for Messrs. Garratt, Owen, Ravener, and Reiser, an executive

physical medical examination; (3) for Messrs. Vasos, Garratt, Owen, and Ravener, one or more directed charitable donations; (4) for Messrs.

Vasos, Owen, and Ravener, limited personal travel expenses, most often associated with a guest’s attendance at business events; and (5) for

Mr. Vasos, a security assessment. We also provide each named executive officer with certain perquisites and personal benefits at no aggregate

incremental cost to Dollar General, including access to participation in a group umbrella liability insurance program through a third party

vendor at a group rate paid by the executive and coverage under our business travel accident insurance for which Dollar General pays a flat

fee for the eligible employee population. The aggregate incremental cost associated with Mr. Reiser’s relocation included expenses associated

with physical movement of his household goods (including automobile), costs incurred in connection with the sale of his former home (such as

appraisals, inspections, pre-title expenses, title and deed costs, broker’s commission, document preparation fees, recording fees and legal

fees), and final move expenses.

30 2019 Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2018 The table below shows each named executive officer’s fiscal 2018 Teamshare bonus opportunity under “Estimated

Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards.” Actual amounts earned under the fiscal 2018 Teamshare

program are shown in the Summary Compensation Table and, for those who received such payments, represent

prorated payment on a graduated scale for financial performance between the threshold and target performance

levels. See “Short-Term Cash Incentive Plan” in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for discussion of such

Teamshare program.

The table below also shows information regarding equity awards made to our named executive officers for fiscal

2018, all of which were granted pursuant to our Stock Incentive Plan. The awards listed under “Estimated Future

Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards” include the threshold, target, and maximum number of PSUs which

could be earned by each named executive officer based upon the level of achievement of the applicable financial

performance measures. The awards listed under “All Other Option Awards” include non-qualified stock options that

vest over time based upon the applicable named executive officer’s continued employment by Dollar General. See

“Long-Term Equity Incentive Program” in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above for further discussion of

these awards. We have omitted from this table the column for “All Other Stock Awards” because it is inapplicable.

Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan

Awards

Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards

All Other Option

Awards: Number of Securities Underlying

Options (#)

Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)(1)

Grant Date Fair Value of

Stock and

Option Awards

($)(2)Name Grant Date

Threshold ($)

Target ($)

Maximum ($)

Threshold (#)

Target (#)

Maximum (#)

Mr. Vasos — 900,000 1,800,000 5,400,000 — — — — — —

03/21/18 — — — — — — 157,197 92.98 3,793,604

03/21/18 — — — 20,462 40,924 122,772 — — 3,805,114

Mr. Garratt — 271,875 543,750 1,631,250 — — — — — —

03/21/18 — — — — — — 27,510 92.98 663,893

03/21/18 — — — 3,581 7,162 21,486 — — 665,923

Mr. Owen — 246,191 492,383 1,477,148 — — — — — —

03/21/18 — — — — — — 29,475 92.98 711,314

03/21/18 — — — 3,837 7,673 23,019 — — 713,436

Mr. Ravener — 218,358 436,716 1,310,148 — — — — — —

03/21/18 — — — — — — 29,475 92.98 711,314

03/21/18 — — — 3,837 7,673 23,019 — — 713,436

Mr. Reiser — 250,258 500,516 1,501,549 — — — — — —

03/21/18 — — — — — — 25,545 92.98 616,472

03/21/18 — — — 3,325 6,650 19,950 — — 618,317

(1) The per share exercise price was calculated based on the closing market price of one share of our common stock on the date of grant as reported

by the NYSE.

(2) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of each equity award, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For equity awards that

are subject to performance conditions, the value at the grant date is based upon the probable outcome of such conditions. For information

regarding the assumptions made in the valuation of these awards, see Note 8 of the annual consolidated financial statements included in our 2018

Form 10-K.

2019 Proxy Statement 31

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2018 Fiscal Year-End The table below sets forth information regarding awards granted under our Stock Incentive Plan and held by our

named executive officers as of the end of fiscal 2018. We have omitted from this table the column for “Equity

Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options” because it is inapplicable. All

awards included in the table, to the extent they have not vested, are subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions

as described in “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” PSUs reported in the table are payable

in shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis.

Option Awards Stock Awards

Name Grant Date

Number of Securities Underlying

Unexercised Options

(#) Exercisable

Number of Securities

Underlying Unexercised

Options (#)

Unexercisable

Option Exercise

Price ($)

Option Expiration

Date

Number of Shares or Units of

Stock That Have Not Vested

(#)

Market Value of Shares or Units of

Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(9)

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Number of Unearned

Shares, Units or Other

Rights That Have Not Vested

(#)

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Market or

Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units

or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(9)

Mr. Vasos 03/20/2012 37,440(1) — 45.25 03/20/2022 — — — —

03/18/2013 27,492(1) — 48.11 03/18/2023 — — — —

12/03/2013 2,880(1) — 56.48 12/03/2023 — — — —

03/18/2014 37,926(1) — 57.91 03/18/2024 — — — —

03/17/2015 33,590(2) 11,196(2) 74.72 03/17/2025 — — — —

06/03/2015 85,562(3) 171,120(3) 76.00 06/03/2025 — — — —

03/16/2016 59,801(2) 59,798(2) 84.67 03/16/2026 — — — —

03/16/2016 — 85,759(3) 84.67 03/16/2026 — — — —

03/22/2017 40,378(2) 121,134(2) 70.68 03/22/2027 — — — —

03/21/2018 — 157,197(2) 92.98 03/21/2028 — — — —

03/16/2016 — — — — 8,119(4) 934,010 — —

03/22/2017 — — — — 24,737(5) 2,845,744 20,145(6) 2,317,481

03/21/2018 — — — — 20,073(7) 2,309,198 61,386(8) 7,061,845

Mr. Garratt 12/03/2014 5,031(1) — 66.69 12/03/2024 — — — —

03/17/2015 7,502(2) 2,500(2) 74.72 03/17/2025 — — — —

12/02/2015 5,872(1) 1,957(1) 65.35 12/02/2025 — — — —

03/16/2016 16,446(2) 16,444(2) 84.67 03/16/2026 — — — —

03/22/2017 9,423(2) 28,263(2) 70.68 03/22/2027 — — — —

03/21/2018 — 27,510(2) 92.98 03/21/2028 — — — —

03/16/2016 — — — — 2,232(4) 256,769 — —

03/22/2017 — — — — 5,770(5) 663,781 4,698(6) 540,458

03/21/2018 — — — — 3,513(7) 404,136 10,743(8) 1,235,875

Mr. Owen 08/25/2015 26,778(1) 8,925(1) 73.73 08/25/2025 — — — —

03/16/2016 16,446(2) 16,444(2) 84.67 03/16/2026 — — — —

03/22/2017 9,423(2) 28,263(2) 70.68 03/22/2027 — — — —

03/21/2018 — 29,475(2) 92.98 03/21/2028 — — — —

03/16/2016 — — — — 2,232(4) 256,769 — —

03/22/2017 — — — — 5,770(5) 663,781 4,698(6) 540,458

03/21/2018 — — — — 3,764(7) 433,011 11,508(8) 433,011

32 2019 Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Option Awards Stock Awards

Name Grant Date

Number of Securities Underlying

Unexercised Options

(#) Exercisable

Number of Securities Underlying

Unexercised Options

(#) Unexercisable

Option Exercise

Price ($)

Option Expiration

Date

Number of Shares or Units of

Stock That Have Not Vested

(#)

Market Value of Shares or Units of

Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(9)

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Number of Unearned

Shares, Units or Other

Rights That Have Not Vested

(#)

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Market or

Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units

or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(9)

Mr. Ravener 03/18/2014 27,812(1) — 57.91 03/18/2024 — — — —

03/17/2015 24,633(2) 8,210(2) 74.72 03/17/2025 — — — —

03/16/2016 16,446(2) 16,444(2) 84.67 03/16/2026 — — — —

03/22/2017 10,096(2) 30,282(2) 70.68 03/22/2027 — — — —

03/21/2018 — 29,475(2) 92.98 03/21/2028 — — — —

03/16/2016 — — — — 2,232(4) 256,769 — —

03/22/2017 — — — — 6,183(5) 711,292 5,034(6) 579,111

03/21/2018 — — — — 3,764(7) 433,011 11,508(8) 433,011

Mr. Reiser 08/29/2017 11,516(1) 34,545(1) 76.89 08/29/2027 — — — —

03/21/2018 — 25,545(2) 92.98 03/21/2028 — — — —

03/21/2018 — — — — 3,262(7) 375,260 9,975(8) 1,147,524

(1) Part of a time-based options grant with a vesting schedule of 25% per year on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date.

(2) Part of a time-based options grant with a vesting schedule of 25% per year on each of the first four anniversaries of the April 1 following the grant

date.

(3) Part of a time-based options grant with a vesting schedule of 33 1/3% per year on each of the third, fourth, and fifth anniversaries of the grant date.

(4) Part of PSUs earned as a result of our fiscal 2016 adjusted EBITDA and adjusted ROIC performance and scheduled to vest on April 1, 2019.

(5) Part of a PSU grant, 59% of which were earned as a result of our fiscal 2017 adjusted EBITDA performance and are scheduled to vest 50% per year

on each of April 1, 2019 and April 1, 2020 and 41% of which were earned as a result of our fiscal 2017-2018 adjusted ROIC performance and are

scheduled to vest on April 1, 2019.

(6) Part of a PSU grant that is scheduled to vest on April 1, 2020 if the adjusted ROIC performance goal is achieved for fiscal years 2017-2019. The

number of PSUs reported in this column assumes achievement of the maximum level of adjusted ROIC performance for the performance period.

The actual number of PSUs earned, if any, will be determined based on the actual level of adjusted ROIC performance achieved for the

performance period.

(7) Part of a PSU grant that was earned as a result of our fiscal 2018 adjusted EBITDA performance and is scheduled to vest 33 1/3% per year on each

of the first three anniversaries of the April 1 following the grant date.

(8) Part of a PSU grant that is scheduled to vest on April 1, 2021 if the adjusted ROIC performance goal is achieved for fiscal years 2018-2020. The

number of PSUs reported in this column assumes achievement of the maximum level of adjusted ROIC performance for the performance period.

The actual number of PSUs earned, if any, will be determined based on the actual level of adjusted ROIC performance achieved for the

performance period.

(9) Computed by multiplying the number of shares or units by the closing market price of one share of our common stock on February 1, 2019 as

reported by the NYSE.

2019 Proxy Statement 33

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal 2018

Option Awards Stock Awards

Name

Number of Shares

Acquired on Exercise

(#)(1)

Value Realized on Exercise

($)(2)

Number of Shares

Acquired on Vesting

(#)(3)

Value Realized on Vesting

($)(4)

Mr. Vasos — — 32,770 3,065,634

Mr. Garratt — — 7,949 743,629

Mr. Owen — — 7,127 666,731

Mr. Ravener 87,107 5,659,045 10,179 952,245

Mr. Reiser — — — —

(1) Represents the gross number of option shares exercised, without deduction for shares that may have been surrendered or withheld to satisfy the

exercise price or applicable tax withholding obligations.

(2) Value realized is calculated by multiplying the gross number of options exercised by the difference between the market price of our common

stock at exercise as reported by the NYSE and the exercise price.

(3) Represents the gross number of shares acquired upon vesting of PSUs and RSUs, as applicable, without deduction for shares that may have been

withheld to satisfy applicable tax withholding obligations.

(4) Value realized is calculated by multiplying the gross number of shares vested by the closing market price of our common stock on the vesting date

as reported by the NYSE.

Pension Benefits Fiscal 2018 We have omitted the Pension Benefits table because it is inapplicable.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Fiscal 2018 Information regarding each named executive officer’s participation in our CDP is included in the following table. The

material terms of the CDP are described after the table. Please also see “Benefits and Perquisites” in “Compensation

Discussion and Analysis” above. We have omitted from this table the column pertaining to “Aggregate Withdrawals/

Distributions” during the fiscal year because it is inapplicable.

Name

Executive Contributions

in Last FY ($)(1)

Registrant Contributions

in Last FY ($)(2)

Aggregate Earnings

in Last FY ($)(3)

Aggregate Balance at Last FYE

($)(4)

Mr. Vasos 155,495 45,665 2,251 1,231,374

Mr. Garratt 35,326 21,363 (2,090) 169,431

Mr. Owen 32,633 19,036 (2,852) 166,067

Mr. Ravener 28,944 15,358 (4,716) 595,322

Mr. Reiser 33,224 22,101 (316) 60,356

(1) Of the reported amounts, the following are reported in the Summary Compensation Table as “Salary” for 2018: Mr. Vasos ($59,444); Mr. Garratt

($35,326); Mr. Owen ($32,633); Mr. Ravener ($28,944); and Mr. Reiser ($33,224).

(2) Reported as “All Other Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table.

(3) The amounts shown are not reported in the Summary Compensation Table because they do not represent above-market or preferential earnings.

(4) Of the amounts reported, the following were previously reported as compensation for years prior to 2018 in a Summary Compensation Table:

Mr. Vasos ($836,633); Mr. Garratt ($99,643); Mr. Owen ($97,556); Mr. Ravener ($112,887); and Mr. Reiser ($0).

34 2019 Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Pursuant to the CDP, each named executive officer may

annually elect to defer up to 65% of his base salary if his

compensation exceeds the limit set forth in

Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code, and up

to 100% of his bonus pay if his compensation equals or

exceeds the highly compensated limit under

Section 414(q)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code. We

currently match base pay deferrals at a rate of 100%, up

to 5% of annual salary, with annual salary offset by the

amount of match-eligible salary under the 401(k) Plan.

All named executive officers are 100% vested in

compensation and matching deferrals and earnings on

those deferrals.

The amounts deferred or contributed to the CDP are

credited to a liability account, which is then invested at

the participant’s option in an account that mirrors the

performance of a fund or funds selected by the

Compensation Committee or its delegate. These funds

are identical to the funds offered in our 401(k) Plan.

For a participant who ceases employment with at least

10 years of service or after reaching age 50 and whose

CDP account balance exceeds certain dollar thresholds,

the account balance will be paid by (a) lump sum,

(b) monthly installments over a 5, 10 or 15-year period or

(c) a combination of lump sum and installments,

pursuant to the participant’s election. Otherwise,

payment is made in a lump sum. The vested amount will

be payable at the time designated by the CDP upon the

participant’s termination of employment. A participant’s

CDP benefit normally is payable in the following

February if employment ceases during the first

6 months of a calendar year or is payable in the

following August if employment ceases during the last

6 months of a calendar year. However, participants may

elect to receive an in-service lump sum distribution of

vested amounts credited to the CDP account, provided

that the date of distribution is no sooner than 5 years

after the end of the year in which the amounts were

deferred. In addition, a participant who is actively

employed may request an “unforeseeable emergency

hardship” in-service lump sum distribution of vested

amounts credited to the participant’s CDP account.

Account balances are payable in cash.

As a result of our change in control which occurred in

2007, the CDP liabilities through July 6, 2007 were fully

funded into an irrevocable rabbi trust. We also funded

into the rabbi trust deferrals into the CDP between

July 6, 2007 and October 15, 2007. All CDP liabilities

incurred on or after October 15, 2007 are unfunded.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control Our agreements with our named executive officers and

certain plans and programs in which such officers

participate, in each case as in effect at the end of our

2018 fiscal year, provide for benefits or payments upon

certain employment termination or change in control

events. We discuss these benefits and payments below

except to the extent they are available generally to all

salaried employees and do not discriminate in favor of

our executive officers or to the extent already discussed

under “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Fiscal 2018”

above. The discussion of equity awards in each scenario

below includes nonqualified stock options outstanding

as of the end of our 2018 fiscal year, as well as PSUs

awarded in 2016 (“2016 PSUs”), 2017 (“2017 PSUs”), and

2018 (“2018 PSUs”) to each named executive officer

employed by us at the time of the applicable award.

Payments Upon Termination Due to Death or Disability

Equity Awards

If a named executive officer’s employment with us

terminates due to death or disability (as defined in the

governing agreement):

• Stock Options. Any outstanding unvested stock

option shall become immediately vested and

exercisable with respect to 100% of the underlying

shares immediately prior to such event, and such

vested options may be exercised until the 1st

anniversary of the termination date but no later than

the 10th anniversary of the grant date.

• Performance Share Units. Except as described below,

any unearned or unvested PSUs shall be forfeited and

cancelled on the termination date or the last day of

the performance period, as applicable.

✓ 2016 PSUs. Any remaining earned but unvested

2016 PSUs shall become vested and nonforfeitable

as of the termination date and shall be paid within

30 days thereafter.

✓ 2017 PSUs. Any earned but unvested 2017 PSUs

subject to the one-year goal (the “2017 Adjusted

EBITDA PSUs”) shall become vested and

nonforfeitable as of the termination date but shall

be paid at the same time as if no termination had

occurred. The remaining portion of the 2017 PSUs

subject to the Adjusted ROIC goals (the “2017

Adjusted ROIC PSUs”) are allocated to a two-year

and a three-year performance period (each an

2019 Proxy Statement 35

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

“ROIC performance period”). For the 2017

Adjusted ROIC PSUs allocated to each such ROIC

performance period, if the termination occurs

before the end of the applicable ROIC

performance period, a pro-rata portion (based on

months employed during the applicable ROIC

performance period) of the 2017 Adjusted ROIC

PSUs earned based on performance during the

entire applicable ROIC performance period shall

become vested and nonforfeitable as of the

applicable April 1 vesting date and shall be paid at

the same time as if no termination had occurred. If

the termination occurs on or after the end of the

applicable ROIC performance period, any

remaining earned but unvested 2017 Adjusted

ROIC PSUs attributable to such ROIC performance

period shall become vested and nonforfeitable as

of the termination date but shall be paid at the

same time as if no termination had occurred.

✓ 2018 PSUs. If the termination occurs before the

end of the applicable one-year or three-year

performance period, a pro-rata portion (based on

months employed during the one-year

performance period) of one-third of the 2018 PSUs

subject to the one-year goal (the “2018 Adjusted

EBITDA PSUs”) and a pro-rata portion (based on

months employed during the three-year

performance period) of the 2018 PSUs subject to

the three-year goal (the “2018 Adjusted ROIC

PSUs”), in each case earned based on performance

during the entire applicable performance period,

shall become vested and nonforfeitable as of the

end of the applicable performance period and shall

be paid at the same time as if no termination had

occurred. If the termination occurs on or after the

end of the applicable one-year or three-year

performance period but before an applicable

vesting date, any earned but unvested 2018 PSUs

shall become vested and nonforfeitable as of the

termination date but shall be paid at the same time

as if no termination had occurred.

Other Payments

In the event of death, a named executive officer’s

beneficiary will receive payments under our group life

insurance program in an amount, up to a maximum of

$4 million, equal to 2.5 times such officer’s annual base

salary. In addition, in the event of disability (as defined in

the governing document), a named executive officer

would receive 60% of covered monthly earnings up to a

$20,000 monthly benefit under our long-term disability

insurance program. In the event of death or disability (as

defined in the CDP), a named executive officer’s CDP

benefit will be payable in a lump sum within 60 days

after the end of the calendar quarter in which such

termination event occurs, provided that we may delay

payment in the event of disability until as soon as

reasonably practicable after receipt of the disability

determination by the Social Security Administration.

Dependent upon the cause of death or loss suffered, a

named executive officer may also be eligible to receive

payment of up to $50,000 under our group accidental

death & dismemberment program. Additionally, in the

event of death on or after the last day of a fiscal year, a

named executive officer will receive payment for his

incentive bonus earned for that fiscal year under the

terms of our Teamshare program (which otherwise

generally requires that a participant remain employed

on the payment date to be entitled to any incentive

bonus earned for that fiscal year).

Payments Upon Termination Due to Retirement

Except as provided immediately below with respect to

equity awards, retirement (as defined in the applicable

governing document) is not treated differently from any

other voluntary termination without good reason (as

defined in the relevant agreements, and as discussed

below under “Payments Upon Voluntary Termination”)

under any of our plans or agreements for named

executive officers.

In the event a named executive officer retires:

• Stock Options. The portion of the outstanding unvested

stock options that would have become vested and

exercisable within the one-year period following the

retirement date if such officer had remained employed

with us shall remain outstanding for a period of one year

following the retirement date and shall become vested

and exercisable on the anniversary of the grant date

that falls within the one-year period following the

retirement date. However, if during such one-year

period the officer dies or incurs a disability or, for

options granted prior to 2016, a change in control

occurs, such portion shall instead become immediately

vested and exercisable upon such death, disability or

change in control. Otherwise, any option which is

unvested and unexercisable on the termination date

shall immediately expire without payment. The officer

may exercise the option to the extent vested and

exercisable any time prior to the 5th anniversary of the

retirement date, but no later than the 10th anniversary of

the grant date.

• Performance Share Units. Except as described below,

any unearned or unvested PSUs shall be forfeited and

cancelled on the retirement date or the last day of the

performance period, as applicable.

✓ 2016 PSUs. Any remaining earned but unvested

2016 PSUs would become vested and

nonforfeitable and would be paid on the

retirement date.

36 2019 Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

✓ 2017 PSUs. If the retirement occurs before the

next April 1 vesting date, one-third of the earned

2017 Adjusted EBITDA PSUs that would have

become vested on the next vesting date shall

become vested and nonforfeitable as of the

retirement date but shall be paid at the same time

as if no retirement had occurred. The vesting and

payment of the 2017 Adjusted ROIC PSUs in a

retirement scenario is identical to the vesting and

payment in the death and disability scenarios

discussed above for the 2017 Adjusted ROIC PSUs.

✓ 2018 PSUs. With the exception outlined below, the

vesting and payment of the 2018 PSUs in a

retirement scenario before the end of the

applicable one-year or three-year performance

period and on or after the end of such periods is

identical to the vesting and payment in the death

and disability scenarios discussed above for the

2018 PSUs during these respective time periods.

However, if the retirement occurs on or after the

end of the one-year performance period but

before an applicable vesting date, one-third of the

2018 Adjusted EBITDA PSUs that would have

become vested on the next vesting date shall

become vested and nonforfeitable as of the

retirement date but shall be paid at the same time

as if no retirement had occurred.

✓ See “Payments After a Change in Control” for a

discussion of treatment of the 2017 PSUs and the

2018 PSUs if a named executive officer terminates

employment due to retirement within two years

following a change in control.

Payments Upon Voluntary Termination

The payments to be made to a named executive officer

upon voluntary termination vary depending upon

whether the resignation occurs with or without “good

reason” (as defined in the applicable governing

agreement) or after our failure to offer to renew, extend

or replace the applicable employment agreement under

certain circumstances.

Voluntary Termination with Good Reason or After Failure to Renew the Employment Agreement

If a named executive officer resigns with good reason

(as defined in the applicable equity award agreement),

he will forfeit all then unvested equity awards and

generally may exercise any outstanding vested options

up to 90 days following the resignation date, but no

later than the 10th anniversary of the grant date. Solely

with respect to the special stock option awards granted

to Mr. Vasos on June 3, 2015 and March 16, 2016,

Mr. Vasos will be required to hold any net shares

acquired upon exercise for a period of time ending on

the 5th anniversary of the applicable grant date. If a

named executive officer resigns under the

circumstances described in (2) below, his equity will be

treated as described under “Voluntary Termination

without Good Reason” below. See “Payments After a

Change in Control” for a discussion of treatment of

equity awards if a named executive officer resigns with

good reason within two years following a change in

control.

If a named executive officer resigns (1) with good reason

(as defined in the applicable employment agreement)

after giving 30 days (90 days in the case of Mr. Vasos)

written notice within 30 days after the event purported

to give rise to the claim for good reason and

opportunity for us to cure any such claimed event within

30 days after receiving such notice, or (2) within

60 days (90 days in the case of Mr. Vasos) of our failure

to offer to renew, extend, or replace his employment

agreement before, at, or within 6 months (1 year in the

case of Mr. Vasos) after the end of the agreement’s term

(unless we enter into a mutually acceptable severance

arrangement or the resignation is a result of the named

executive officer’s retirement or termination other than

for good reason), then in each case the named executive

officer will receive the following benefits generally on or

beginning on the 60th day after termination of

employment but contingent upon the execution and

effectiveness of a release of certain claims against us

and our affiliates in the form attached to the

employment agreement:

• Continuation of base salary, generally as in effect

immediately before the termination, for 24 months

payable in accordance with our normal payroll cycle

and procedures.

• A lump sum payment of: (1) for Mr. Vasos, two times

the amount of his annual target bonus under our

annual bonus program for officers in respect of the

fiscal year in which his termination occurs; and (2) for

each other named executive officer, two times the

amount of the average percentage of target bonus

paid to the named executive officer under our annual

bonus program for officers with respect to our two

most recently completed fiscal years (not including a

fiscal year for which the Compensation Committee has

not yet certified financial performance) for which

annual bonuses have been paid to executives under

such program multiplied by such officer’s (A) target

bonus level and (B) base salary (in each case, as

applicable as of the date immediately preceding the

employment termination or, if the termination is for

good reason due to the reduction of such officer’s

target bonus level or base salary, then his target

bonus level and base salary applicable immediately

2019 Proxy Statement 37

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

prior to such reduction). If no bonus was paid to such

officer with respect to one or both of the applicable

fiscal years due to Dollar General’s performance or

individual performance (as opposed to ineligibility due

to length of employment), then such bonus amount

shall be zero in calculating the average.

• Mr. Vasos also will receive a lump sum payment,

payable when annual bonuses are paid to our other

senior executives, of a pro-rata portion of the annual

bonus, if any, that he would have been entitled to

receive for the fiscal year of termination, if such

termination had not occurred, based on our

performance for the fiscal year in which his

employment terminates, multiplied by a fraction, the

numerator of which is the number of days during

which he was employed by us in the fiscal year and

the denominator of which is 365.

• A lump sum payment of two times our annual

contribution that would have been made in respect of

the plan year in which such termination occurs for the

named executive officer’s participation in our

pharmacy, medical, dental, and vision benefits

programs.

• Reasonable outplacement services until the earlier of

one year or subsequent employment.

Note that any amounts owed to a named executive

officer in the form of salary continuation that would

otherwise have been paid during the 60-day period

after termination will instead be payable in a single lump

sum on the 60th day after such termination and the

remainder will be paid in the form of salary continuation

payments over the remaining 24-month period as set

forth above.

In certain cases, some or all of the payments and

benefits provided on termination of employment may be

delayed for six months following termination to comply

with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal

Revenue Code. Any payment required to be delayed

would be paid at the end of the six-month period in a

lump sum, and any payments due after the six-month

period would be paid at the normal payment date

provided for under the applicable employment

agreement.

To the extent permitted by applicable law, in the event

we reasonably believe that the named executive officer

engaged in conduct during employment that would

have resulted in his termination for cause, any unpaid

severance amounts under the applicable employment

agreement may be forfeited and we may seek to

recover such portion of any severance amounts paid

under the applicable employment agreement.

The named executive officer will forfeit any unpaid

severance amounts, and we retain any other rights we

have available under law or equity, upon a material

breach of any continuing obligation under the applicable

employment agreement or the release, which include

the following business protection provisions:

• The named executive officer must maintain the

confidentiality of, and refrain from disclosing or using,

our (a) trade secrets for any period of time as the

information remains a trade secret under applicable

law and (b) confidential information for a period of

two years following the termination date.

• For a period of two years after the termination date,

the named executive officer may not accept or work

in a “competitive position” within any state in which

we maintain stores at the time of his termination date

or any state in which we have specific plans to open

stores within six months of that date. For this purpose,

“competitive position” means any employment,

consulting, advisory, directorship, agency,

promotional, or independent contractor arrangement

between the named executive officer and any person

engaged wholly or in material part in the business in

which we are engaged (including, but not limited to,

those entities identified in the applicable employment

agreement), or any person then planning to enter the

discount consumable basics retail business, if such

officer is required to perform services which are

substantially similar to those he provided or directed

at any time while employed by us.

• For a period of two years after the termination date,

the named executive officer may not actively recruit

or induce any of our exempt employees to cease

employment with us.

• For a period of two years after the termination date,

the named executive officer may not solicit or

communicate with any person or entity who has a

business relationship with us and with whom such

officer had contact while employed by us, if it would

likely interfere with our business relationships or result

in an unfair competitive advantage over us.

In addition, each named executive officer’s rights,

payments, and benefits with respect to any incentive

compensation (in the form of cash or equity) shall be

subject to any reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or

recoupment, in whole or in part, upon the occurrence of

certain specified events, as may be required by any

applicable law, rule or regulation, by any applicable

national exchange, or by a separate Dollar General

clawback or recoupment policy.

38 2019 Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Voluntary Termination without Good Reason

If a named executive officer resigns without good

reason, he will forfeit all then unvested equity awards

and generally may exercise any outstanding vested

options up to 90 days following the resignation date,

but no later than the 10th anniversary of the grant date.

Solely with respect to the special stock option awards

granted to Mr. Vasos on June 3, 2015 and March 16, 2016,

Mr. Vasos will be required to hold any net shares

acquired upon exercise for a period of time ending on

the 5th anniversary of the applicable grant date.

Payments Upon Involuntary Termination

The payments to be made to a named executive officer

upon involuntary termination vary depending upon

whether termination is with or without “cause” (as

defined in the applicable governing agreement).

Involuntary Termination with Cause

Upon an involuntary termination with cause, a named

executive officer will forfeit all unvested equity awards,

all vested but unpaid PSUs and all vested but

unexercised options.

Involuntary Termination without Cause

Upon an involuntary termination without cause, a named

executive officer:

• Will forfeit all then unvested equity awards.

• Generally may exercise any outstanding vested

options up to 90 days following the termination date,

but no later than the 10th anniversary of the grant date.

Solely with respect to the special stock option awards

granted to Mr. Vasos on June 3, 2015 and March 16,

2016, Mr. Vasos will be required to hold any net shares

acquired upon exercise for a period of time ending on

the 5th anniversary of the applicable grant date.

• Will receive the same severance payments and

benefits on the same terms and conditions (except for

the notice and cure provisions) as described under

“Voluntary Termination with Good Reason or After

Failure to Renew the Employment Agreement” above.

See “Payments After a Change in Control” for a

discussion of the treatment of equity awards if a named

executive officer is involuntarily terminated without

cause within two years following a change in control.

Payments After a Change in Control

Upon a change in control (as defined under the

applicable governing document), regardless of whether

the named executive officer’s employment terminates:

• All outstanding unvested options awarded prior to

2016 will vest and become immediately exercisable as

to 100% of the underlying shares immediately prior to

the change in control.

• If the change in control occurs on or before the end of

the applicable performance period, and the named

executive officer has remained continuously employed

until the change in control, the target number of the

applicable unvested PSUs shall be deemed earned but

otherwise continue to be subject to the service and

payment provisions, including applicable pro-ration

requirements, of the applicable award agreement.

A named executive officer will have one year from the

termination date (but no later than the 10th anniversary

of the grant date) in which to exercise outstanding

vested options that were granted prior to 2016 if he

resigns or is involuntarily terminated within two years

following the change in control under any scenario other

than retirement or involuntary termination with cause, in

which respective cases, he will have five years from the

retirement date (but no later than the 10th anniversary of

the grant date) to exercise such vested options and will

forfeit any vested but unexercised options held at the

time of the termination with cause.

Upon the named executive officer’s “qualifying

termination,” which includes involuntary termination

without cause or resignation with good reason (unless

cause to terminate exists), in each case as defined in the

applicable equity award agreement, as well as voluntary

resignation due to retirement (unless cause to terminate

exists) as defined in the applicable equity award

agreement in the case of 2017 PSUs and 2018 PSUs, in

each case within two years following a change in control

(provided that the officer was continuously employed

by us until the change in control) and in the case of 2017

PSUs and 2018 PSUs if the termination also constitutes a

“separation from service” within the meaning of

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code: (1) all of his

outstanding unvested options awarded after 2015 will

immediately vest and become exercisable as to 100% of

the shares underlying such options on the termination

date and the officer may exercise any outstanding

vested options up to three years following the

termination date, but no later than the 10th anniversary

of the grant date; and (2) all of his previously earned, or

deemed earned, but unvested PSUs that have not been

previously forfeited will immediately vest, become

nonforfeitable, and be paid

2019 Proxy Statement 39

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

on the termination date subject, in the case of the 2017

PSUs and 2018 PSUs, to a six-month delay if applicable

to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue

Code. To qualify as a resignation with good reason for

this purpose, the officer must have provided written

notice of the existence of the circumstances providing

grounds for resignation with good reason within 30 days

of the initial existence of such grounds and must have

given Dollar General at least 30 days from receipt of

such notice to cure such condition. In addition, the

resignation must have become effective no later than

one year after the initial existence of the condition

constituting good reason.

Except as otherwise described above with respect to

equity awards, upon an involuntary termination without

cause or a resignation with good reason following the

change in control, a named executive officer will receive

the same severance payments and benefits as described

above under “Voluntary Termination with Good Reason

or After Failure to Renew the Employment Agreement.”

In the event of a change in control as defined in

Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, each named

executive officer’s employment agreement provides for

capped payments (taking into consideration all

payments and benefits covered by such Section 280G)

of $1 less than the amount that would trigger the

“golden parachute” excise tax under federal income tax

rules (the “excise tax”) unless he signs a release and the

after-tax benefit would be at least $50,000 more than it

would be without capping the payments. In such case,

such officer’s payments and benefits would not be

capped and he would be responsible for the excise tax

payment. We would not pay any additional amount to

cover the excise tax. The table below reflects the

uncapped amounts, subject to reduction in the

circumstances described in this paragraph.

The following table reflects potential payments to each

named executive officer in various termination and

change in control scenarios based on compensation,

benefit, and equity levels in effect on, and assuming the

scenario was effective as of, February 1, 2019. For stock

valuations, we have used the closing price of our stock

on the NYSE on February 1, 2019 ($115.04). The table

below reports only amounts that are increased,

accelerated, or otherwise paid or owed as a result of the

applicable scenario and, as a result, exclude earned but

unpaid base salary through the employment termination

date and equity awards and CDP benefits that had

vested prior to the event. For more information

regarding the CDP benefits, see “Nonqualified Deferred

Compensation Fiscal 2018” above. The table also

excludes any amounts that are available generally to all

salaried employees and do not discriminate in favor of

our executive officers. The amounts shown are merely

estimates. We cannot determine actual amounts to be

paid until a termination or change in control scenario

occurs.

40 2019 Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers Upon Occurrence of Various Termination Events or Change in Control as of February 1, 2019

Name/Item Death ($)(3)

Disability ($)(3)

Retirement ($)(4)

Voluntary Without Good

Reason ($)

Involuntary Without Cause or Voluntary With Good

Reason ($)

Involuntary With Cause

($)

Change in Control Without

Qualifying Termination

($)

Change in Control With

Qualifying Termination

($)

Mr. Vasos

Equity Vesting Due to Event(1) 28,297,377 28,297,377 n/a n/a n/a n/a 7,131,948 27,425,489

Cash Severance 1,717,068 n/a n/a n/a 7,717,068 n/a n/a 7,717,068

Health Payment n/a n/a n/a n/a 13,060 n/a n/a 13,060

Outplacement(2) n/a n/a n/a n/a 8,500 n/a n/a 8,500

Life Insurance Proceeds 3,000,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Total 33,014,445 28,297,377 n/a n/a 7,738,628 n/a 7,131,948 35,164,117

Mr. Garratt

Equity Vesting Due to Event(1) 4,260,312 4,260,312 n/a n/a n/a n/a 198,043 4,054,390

Cash Severance 518,698 n/a n/a n/a 2,517,132 n/a n/a 2,517,132

Health Payment n/a n/a n/a n/a 21,639 n/a n/a 21,639

Outplacement(2) n/a n/a n/a n/a 8,500 n/a n/a 8,500

Life Insurance Proceeds 1,813,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Total 6,592,010 4,260,312 n/a n/a 2,547,271 n/a 198,043 6,601,661

Mr. Owen

Equity Vesting Due to Event(1) 4,512,962 4,512,962 n/a n/a n/a n/a 368,692 4,307,615

Cash Severance 469,697 n/a n/a n/a 2,279,341 n/a n/a 2,279,341

Health Payment n/a n/a n/a n/a 21,639 n/a n/a 21,639

Outplacement(2) n/a n/a n/a n/a 8,500 n/a n/a 8,500

Life Insurance Proceeds 1,642,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Total 6,624,659 4,512,962 n/a n/a 2,309,480 n/a 368,692 6,617,095

Mr. Ravener

Equity Vesting Due to Event(1) 4,629,512 4,629,512 n/a n/a n/a n/a 331,027 4,408,866

Cash Severance 416,595 n/a n/a n/a 2,021,649 n/a n/a 2,021,649

Health Payment n/a n/a n/a n/a 21,639 n/a n/a 21,639

Outplacement(2) n/a n/a n/a n/a 8,500 n/a n/a 8,500

Life Insurance Proceeds 1,456,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Total 6,502,107 4,629,512 n/a n/a 2,051,789 n/a 331,027 6,460,654

Mr. Reiser

Equity Vesting Due to Event(1) 2,384,139 2,384,139 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2,391,387

Cash Severance 477,456 n/a n/a n/a 2,466,226 n/a n/a 2,466,226

Health Payment n/a n/a n/a n/a 21,639 n/a n/a 21,639

Outplacement(2) n/a n/a n/a n/a 8,500 n/a n/a 8,500

Life Insurance Proceeds 1,669,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Total 4,530,595 2,384,139 n/a n/a 2,496,365 n/a n/a 4,887,752

(1) For the portion of the 2017 and 2018 PSUs that are subject to performance for periods ending after February 1, 2019, the value included in the Death

and Disability columns assumes a maximum payout of 300%, prorated for a death or disability termination scenario occurring on February 1, 2019.

(2) Estimated based on information provided by our outplacement services provider.

(3) In addition to the amounts reported above, dependent upon the cause of death or the loss suffered, a named executive officer also may be eligible

to receive payment of up to $50,000 under our group accidental death & dismemberment program.

(4) None of the named executive officers were eligible for retirement on February 1, 2019.

2019 Proxy Statement 41

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation None of Ms. Fili-Krushel or Messrs. Bryant, Rhodes, and

McGuire, each of whom was a member of our

Compensation Committee during all or a portion of

2018: (1) was at any time during 2018 an officer or

employee, or was at any time prior to 2018 an officer, of

Dollar General or any of our subsidiaries; or (2) had any

relationship requiring disclosure under “Transactions

with Management and Others.” Also, none of our

executive officers serves, or in the past fiscal year has

served, as a director or compensation committee (or

equivalent committee) member of any entity that has an

executive officer serving as a Dollar General director or

Compensation Committee member.

Compensation Risk Considerations In March 2019, our Compensation Committee, with input

from its compensation consultant and management,

conducted a risk assessment of our compensation

program for employees, including executive officers. The

assessment included a review of our compensation

programs for certain design features which could

potentially encourage excessive risk-taking or otherwise

create risk to Dollar General. The Committee concluded,

after considering the degree to which risk-aggravating

factors were offset by risk-mitigating factors, that the

net risks created by our overall compensation program

are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse

effect on Dollar General.

Pay Ratio Disclosure As required by Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are

providing the following information about the

relationship of the annual total compensation of our

employees and our Chief Executive Officer (our “CEO”).

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a

manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll

and employment records and the methodology

described below.

The 2018 annual total compensation of the median

compensated employee (a part-time store associate) of

our temporary, part-time, and full-time employee base

who were employed as of the last day of our 2018 fiscal

year (February 1, 2019), other than our CEO, was $13,773;

our CEO’s 2018 annual total compensation was

$10,602,517; and the ratio of these amounts is 1:770.

As of February 1, 2019, our total population consisted of

130,094 compensated employees, of which 73 were

located in non-U.S. jurisdictions as follows: Hong Kong

(21); China (50); Mexico (1); and Turkey (1). Pursuant to

SEC rules, we excluded all such 73 non-U.S. employees.

After applying this exemption, the employee population

used to identify the median employee consisted of

130,021 temporary, part-time, and full-time employees

located solely in the U.S.

To identify the median compensated employee, we used

W-2 Box 5 Medicare wages for the period from

February 3, 2018 (the first day of our 2018 fiscal year)

through February 1, 2019 (the last day of our 2018 fiscal

year), with such amounts annualized for those

permanent employees who did not work for the full

year.

The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated

employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that

employee’s annual total compensation allow companies

to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain

exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and

assumptions that reflect their compensation practices.

As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may

not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as

other companies may have different employment and

compensation practices and may utilize different

methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions

in calculating their own pay ratios.

42 2019 Proxy Statement

SECURITY OWNERSHIP The following tables show the amount of our common stock beneficially owned by the listed persons as of March 21,

2019. For purposes of such tables, a person “beneficially owns” a security if that person has or shares voting or

investment power or has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Unless otherwise noted, to our

knowledge these persons have sole voting and investment power over the shares listed. Percentage computations

are based on 259,178,169 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 21, 2019.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners The following table pertains to beneficial ownership by those known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our

common stock.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Percent of Class

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(1) 25,102,029 9.7%

BlackRock, Inc.(2) 22,207,042 8.6%

The Vanguard Group(3) 19,414,565 7.5%

Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC(4) 14,226,902 5.5%

(1) T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. has sole power to vote or direct the vote of 9,222,624 shares and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of

25,102,029 shares. The address of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. All information is based solely on

Amendment No. 3 to Statement on Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2019.

(2) BlackRock, Inc., through various subsidiaries, has sole power to vote or direct the vote of 19,842,840 shares and sole power to dispose or direct the

disposition of 22,207,042 shares. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055. All information is based solely

on Amendment No. 4 to Statement on Schedule 13G filed on February 4, 2019.

(3) The Vanguard Group has sole power to vote or direct the vote of 322,416 shares, shared power to vote or direct the vote of 77,325 shares, sole

power to dispose or direct the disposition of 19,018,878 shares, and shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of 395,687 shares. Vanguard

Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 241,241 shares as a result of its serving

as investment manager of collective trust accounts, and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group,

Inc., is the beneficial owner of 232,500 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings. The address of

The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355. All information is based solely on Amendment No. 5 to Statement on

Schedule 13G filed on February 11, 2019.

(4) Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC has sole power to vote or direct the vote of 5,194,706 shares, shared power to vote or direct the vote

of 9,032,196 shares, and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 14,226,902 shares. The address of Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss,

LLC is 2200 Ross Avenue, 31st Floor, Dallas, Texas 75201-2761. All information is based solely on Statement on Schedule 13G filed on February 11,

2019.

2019 Proxy Statement 43

SECURITY OWNERSHIP

Security Ownership of Officers and Directors The following table pertains to beneficial ownership of our current directors and our named executive officers

individually and to our current directors and all of our current executive officers as a group. These persons may be

contacted at our executive offices.

Name of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Percent of Class

Warren F. Bryant(1)(2) 37,009 *

Michael M. Calbert(1)(2)(3) 103,065 *

Sandra B. Cochran(1)(2) 24,867 *

Patricia D. Fili-Krushel(1)(2)(4) 23,434 *

Timothy I. McGuire(1)(2) 3,847 *

William C. Rhodes, III(1)(2)(5) 59,076 *

Ralph E. Santana — —

Todd J. Vasos(1) 588,160 *

John W. Garratt(1) 87,178 *

Jeffery C. Owen(1) 92,911 *

Robert D. Ravener(1) 143,182 *

Jason S. Reiser(1) 18,991 *

All current directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5) 1,427,961 *

* Denotes less than 1% of class.

(1) Includes the following number of shares (1) underlying RSUs (including RSUs credited, where applicable, as a result of dividend equivalents earned

with respect to the RSUs) and earned PSUs that are or could be settleable within 60 days of March 21, 2019 over which the person will not have

voting or investment power until the applicable RSUs and PSUs are settled, and (2) subject to options exercisable either currently or within 60

days of March 21, 2019 over which the person will not have voting or investment power until exercised: Mr. Bryant (3,574 RSUs; 16,207 options);

Mr. Calbert (15,356 RSUs; 21,756 options); Ms. Cochran (1,572 RSUs; 13,120 options); Ms. Fili-Krushel (1,572 RSUs; 12,892 options); Mr. McGuire (1,572

RSUs); Mr. Rhodes (1,572 RSUs; 21,756 options); Mr. Vasos (32,282 PSUs; 474,429 options); Mr. Garratt (7,478 PSUs; 71,296 options); Mr. Owen

(7,563 PSUs; 77,661 options); Mr. Ravener (7,855 PSUs; 112,884 options); Mr. Reiser (1,088 PSUs; 17,903 options); and all current directors and

executive officers as a group (27,444 RSUs; 66,983 PSUs; 1,041,651 options). Such shares are considered outstanding for computing the

percentage owned by each named person and by the group but not for any other person.

(2) Share totals have been rounded to the nearest whole share.

(3) Mr. Calbert shares voting and investment power over 51,000 shares with his spouse, Barbara Calbert, as co-trustee of The Michael and Barbara

Calbert 2007 Joint Revocable Trust.

(4) Ms. Fili-Krushel shares voting and investment power over 2,500 shares with her spouse, Kenneth Krushel.

(5) Mr. Rhodes shares voting and investment power over 23,597 shares with his spouse, Amy Rhodes, as power of attorney of The Amy Plunkett

Rhodes Revocable Living Trust, dated July 30, 2014.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance The U.S. securities laws require our executive officers,

directors, and greater than 10% shareholders to file reports

of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4, and

5 with the SEC. Based solely upon a review of these reports

furnished to us during and with respect to 2018, or written

representations that no Form 5 reports were required, we

believe that each of those persons filed, on a timely basis,

the reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

44 2019 Proxy Statement

PROPOSAL 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we provide our

shareholders each year with an opportunity to vote on

an advisory basis on compensation paid to our named

executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement

pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K. Accordingly, we

are asking our shareholders to provide an advisory,

nonbinding vote to approve the compensation of such

officers as we have described it in “Compensation

Discussion and Analysis” and in the accompanying

compensation tables and related narrative discussion in

the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy

statement.

As discussed in detail in the “Compensation Discussion

and Analysis” section above, the Compensation

Committee actively oversees our executive

compensation program, adopting changes to the

program and awarding compensation as appropriate to

reflect Dollar General’s circumstances and to promote

the main objectives of the program. Our compensation

programs are designed to attract, retain, and motivate

persons with superior ability, to reward outstanding

performance, and to align the long-term interests of our

named executive officers with those of our shareholders.

Under these programs, our named executive officers are

rewarded for the achievement of specific annual and

long-term goals and the realization of increased

shareholder value. We firmly believe that the information

we have provided in this proxy statement demonstrates

that our executive compensation program was designed

appropriately and is working to ensure that

management’s interests are aligned with our

shareholders’ interests to support long-term value

creation.

Our Board of Directors is asking our shareholders to

indicate their support for our named executive officer

compensation as described in this proxy statement in

accordance with SEC rules by voting for this proposal.

Because the vote on this proposal is advisory in nature,

it will not affect any compensation already paid or

awarded to any such officer and will not be binding on

or overrule any decisions by the Compensation

Committee or the Board. Nonetheless, our Board and

the Compensation Committee value our shareholders’

views and intend to consider the outcome of the vote,

along with other relevant factors, when making future

compensation decisions for our named executive

officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific

item of compensation, but rather the overall

compensation of our named executive officers. This

advisory vote is not a vote on the compensation of our

Board, as described under “Director Compensation,” or

on our compensation policies as they relate to risk

management, as described under “Compensation Risk

Considerations” in the “Executive Compensation”

section above.

FOR The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement.

2019 Proxy Statement 45

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has:

• reviewed and discussed with management the audited

financial statements for the fiscal year ended

February 1, 2019,

• discussed with Ernst & Young LLP, our independent

registered public accounting firm, the matters

required to be discussed by the Statement on

Auditing Standards No. 1301, Communications with

Audit Committees, as adopted by the Public Company

Accounting Oversight Board,

• received the written disclosures and the letter from

Ernst & Young LLP required by applicable

requirements of the Public Company Accounting

Oversight Board regarding the independent registered

public accounting firm’s communications with the

Audit Committee concerning independence, and

• discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence

from Dollar General and its management.

Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit

Committee unanimously recommended to the Board of

Directors that Dollar General’s audited financial

statements be included in the Annual Report on Form

10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2019 for filing

with the SEC.

While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and

powers set forth in its charter, the Audit Committee

does not have the duty to plan or conduct audits or to

determine that Dollar General’s financial statements are

complete, accurate, or in accordance with generally

accepted accounting principles. Dollar General’s

management and independent auditor have this

responsibility.

This report has been furnished by the members of the

Audit Committee:

• William C. Rhodes, III, Chairman

• Warren F. Bryant

• Sandra B. Cochran

The above Audit Committee Report does not constitute

soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or

incorporated by reference into any other Dollar General

filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent Dollar

General specifically incorporates this report by reference

therein.

46 2019 Proxy Statement

PROPOSAL 3: Ratification of Appointment of Auditors

Who is responsible for the selection of the independent auditor?

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the

appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of

the independent auditor that is retained to audit our

financial statements.

Was the Audit Committee involved in the lead audit partner selection process?

Yes. Prior to the selection of the current lead audit

partner, the Chairman of the Audit Committee

interviewed the lead audit partner candidates, and the

Audit Committee discussed with management such

candidates’ qualifications and experience.

Does the Audit Committee evaluate the independent auditor and the lead audit partner?

Yes. The Audit Committee annually evaluates the lead

audit partner, as well as the independent auditor’s

qualifications, performance, and independence. The

evaluation, which includes the input of management,

entails consideration of a broad range of factors,

including the quality of services and sufficiency of

resources that have been provided; the skills,

knowledge, and experience of the firm and the audit

team; the effectiveness and sufficiency of

communications and interactions; independence and

level of objectivity and professional skepticism;

reasonableness of fees; and other factors.

Who has the Audit Committee selected as the independent registered public accounting firm?

After conducting the evaluation process discussed

above, the Audit Committee selected Ernst & Young

LLP as our independent auditor for the 2019 fiscal year.

Ernst & Young LLP has served in that capacity since

October 2001. The Audit Committee and the Board of

Directors believe that the continued retention of Ernst &

Young LLP is in the best interests of Dollar General and

our shareholders.

Will representatives of Ernst & Young LLP attend the annual meeting?

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP have been

requested and are expected to attend the annual

meeting. These representatives will have the

opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and

are expected to be available to respond to appropriate

questions.

What if shareholders do not ratify the appointment?

The Audit Committee is not bound by a vote either for

or against the firm. If the shareholders do not ratify this

appointment, our Audit Committee will consider that

result in selecting our independent auditor in the future.

FOR The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for the 2019 fiscal year.

2019 Proxy Statement 47

FEES PAID TO AUDITORS

The table below lists the aggregate fees for professional

audit services rendered to us by Ernst & Young LLP for

the audit of our consolidated financial statements for

the past two fiscal years and fees billed for other

services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP during the past

two fiscal years. Information related to audit fees for

2018 includes amounts billed through February 1, 2019,

and additional amounts estimated to be billed for the

2018 period for audit services rendered.

Service 2018 Aggregate Fees Billed ($) 2017 Aggregate Fees Billed ($)

Audit Fees(1) 2,898,361 2,743,085

Audit-Related Fees(2) 35,000 35,000

Tax Fees(3) 2,431,222 1,804,562

All Other Fees(4) 7,120 1,995

(1) Represents for each fiscal year the aggregate fees billed for professional services for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of

financial statements included in our Forms 10-Q and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or

engagements. 2017 fees increased from the prior year’s disclosure by $67,961 due to invoices received subsequent to the filing of the proxy

statement that were greater than the original amount estimated.

(2) Represents for each fiscal year the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the

audit or review of our financial statements. The fees for each year relate to the employee benefit plan audit.

(3) 2018 and 2017 fees relate primarily to tax compliance services, which represented $2,181,222 and $1,649,562 in 2018 and 2017, respectively, for work

related to work opportunity tax credit assistance, foreign sourcing offices’ tax compliance, state tax credit assistance, and, for 2018 only, for long-

term unemployed credits and hurricane zone credit assistance. The remaining tax fees for each such year are for tax advisory services related to

inventory, and, for 2018 only, for tax reform advisory services.

(4) 2018 and 2017 fees are for a subscription fee to an on-line accounting research tool.

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and

permissible non-audit services provided by our

independent auditor. Where feasible, the Committee

considers and, when appropriate, pre-approves services

at regularly scheduled meetings after disclosure by

management and the independent auditor of the nature

of the proposed services, the estimated fees (when

available), and their opinions that the services will not

impair the independence of the independent auditor.

The Committee’s Chairman (or any Committee member

if the Chairman is unavailable) may pre-approve such

services between Committee meetings, and must report

to the Committee at its next meeting with respect to all

services so pre-approved. The Committee pre-approved

100% of the services provided by Ernst & Young LLP

during 2018 and 2017.

48 2019 Proxy Statement

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2020 ANNUAL MEETING All shareholder proposals and notices discussed below

must be mailed to Corporate Secretary, Dollar General

Corporation, 100 Mission Ridge, Goodlettsville,

Tennessee 37072. Shareholder proposals and director

nominations that are not included in our proxy materials

will not be considered at any annual meeting of

shareholders unless such proposals have complied with

the requirements of our amended and restated Bylaws.

Shareholder Proposals

To be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials

relating to the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders (the

“2020 Annual Meeting”), eligible shareholders must

submit proposals that comply with Rule 14a-8 under the

Exchange Act and other relevant SEC regulations for

our receipt by December 6, 2019.

New Business at 2020 Annual Meeting

To introduce other new business, including the

nomination of directors (other than a proxy access

nomination, which is described below) at the 2020

Annual Meeting, you must deliver written notice to us no

earlier than the close of business on January 30, 2020

and no later than the close of business on February 29,

2020, and comply with the advance notice provisions of

our amended and restated Bylaws. If we do not receive

a properly submitted shareholder proposal by

February 29, 2020, then the proxies held by our

management may provide the discretion to vote against

such shareholder proposal even though the proposal is

not discussed in our proxy materials sent in connection

with the 2020 Annual Meeting.

Proxy Access

Our amended and restated Bylaws contain proxy access

provisions that permit a shareholder, or a group of up to

20 shareholders, owning 3% or more of our stock

continuously for at least three years, to nominate and

include in our proxy materials candidates for election as

directors. Such shareholder or group may nominate up

to 20% of our Board, provided that the shareholder or

group and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements

specified in our amended and restated Bylaws. In order

to be properly brought before our 2020 Annual Meeting,

an eligible shareholder’s notice of nomination of a

director candidate pursuant to the proxy access

provisions of our amended and restated Bylaws must be

received by us no earlier than the close of business on

November 6, 2019 and no later than the close of

business on December 6, 2019, and comply with the

other relevant provisions of our amended and restated

Bylaws pertaining to proxy access nominees.

2019 Proxy Statement 49

10-K

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended February 1, 2019

Commission file number: 001-11421

DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

TENNESSEE 61-0502302 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

100 MISSION RIDGE GOODLETTSVILLE, TN 37072

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (615) 855-4000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class Name of the exchange on which registered Common Stock, par value $0.875 per share New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  Accelerated filer  Non-accelerated filer  Smaller reporting company  Emerging growth company 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  No 

The aggregate fair market value of the registrant’s common stock outstanding and held by non-affiliates as of August 3, 2018 was $23.2 billion calculated using the closing market price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE on such date ($98.23). For this purpose, directors, executive officers and greater than 10% record shareholders are considered the affiliates of the registrant.

The registrant had 259,518,801 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 18, 2019.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain of the information required in Part III of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 29, 2019.

2 2018 Form 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK . 40 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS . . 42 DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF

INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF

CASH FLOWS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE . . . . . 73 ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND

MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 ITEM 16 FORM 10-K SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81

SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82

2018 Form 10-K 3

INTRODUCTION General

This report contains references to years 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014, which represent fiscal years ending or ended January 31, 2020, February 1, 2019, February 2, 2018, February 3, 2017, January 29, 2016, and January 30, 2015, respectively. Our fiscal year ends on the Friday closest to January 31. Our 2016 fiscal year consisted of 53 weeks, while each of the remaining years listed consists of 52 weeks. All of the discussion and analysis in this report should be read with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes.

Solely for convenience, our trademarks and tradenames may appear in this report without the ® or TM

symbol which is not intended to indicate that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or the right to these trademarks and tradenames. Cautionary Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

We include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws throughout this report, particularly under the headings “Business,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and “Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies,” among others. You can identify these statements because they are not limited to historical fact or they use words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “can,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “project,” “plan,” “expect,” “estimate,” “goal,” “seek,” “ensure,” “potential,” “opportunity,” “objective,” “intend,” “predict,” “committed,” “likely,” “continue,” “strive,” “aim,” “scheduled,” “focused on,” or “subject to” and similar expressions that concern our strategies, plans, initiatives, intentions or beliefs about future occurrences or results. For example, all statements relating to, among others, our estimated and projected expenditures, cash flows, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity; our plans and objectives for, and expectations regarding future operations, economic and competitive market conditions, growth or initiatives, including but not limited to the number of planned store openings, remodels and relocations, store formats, progress of merchandising and other initiatives, trends in sales of consumable and non-consumable products, and level of future costs and expenses; potential future stock repurchases and cash dividends; anticipated borrowing under our unsecured revolving credit agreement and commercial paper program; potential impact of legal or regulatory changes and our responses thereto, including the potential impact of tariffs by the U.S. government; anticipated impact of new accounting standards; efforts to improve distribution and transportation efficiencies, including self-distribution, and anticipated timing of distribution center openings; or expected outcome or effect of pending or threatened litigation or audits are forward-looking statements.

All forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our

actual results to differ materially from those which we expected. Many of these statements are derived from our operating budgets and forecasts, which are based on many detailed assumptions that we believe are reasonable. However, it is very difficult to predict the effect of known factors, and we cannot anticipate all factors that could affect future results.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed or

implied in our forward-looking statements are disclosed under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A and elsewhere in this document (including, without limitation, in conjunction with the forward-looking statements themselves and under the heading “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates”). All forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by these and other cautionary statements that we make from time to time in our other SEC filings and public communications. You should evaluate forward-looking statements in the context of these risks and uncertainties and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements. These factors may not contain all of the factors that are important to you. We cannot assure you that we will realize the results or developments we expect or anticipate or, even if substantially realized, that they will result in the consequences or affect us or our operations in the way we expect. Forward-looking statements in this report are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation, and specifically disclaim any duty, to update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

4 2018 Form 10-K

PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS General

We are among the largest discount retailers in the United States by number of stores, with 15,472 stores located in 44 states as of March 1, 2019, with the greatest concentration of stores in the southern, southwestern, midwestern and eastern United States. We offer a broad selection of merchandise, including consumable items, seasonal items, home products and apparel. Our merchandise includes national brands from leading manufacturers, as well as our own private brand selections with prices at substantial discounts to national brands. We offer our customers these national brand and private brand products at everyday low prices (typically $10 or less) in our convenient small-box locations.

Our History

J.L. Turner founded our Company in 1939 as J.L. Turner and Son, Wholesale. We were incorporated as a

Kentucky corporation under the name J.L. Turner & Son, Inc. in 1955, when we opened our first Dollar General store. We changed our name to Dollar General Corporation in 1968 and reincorporated in 1998 as a Tennessee corporation. Our common stock was publicly traded from 1968 until July 2007, when we merged with an entity controlled by investment funds affiliated with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P., or KKR. In November 2009 our common stock again became publicly traded, and in December 2013 the entity controlled by investment funds affiliated with KKR sold its remaining shares of our common stock. Our Business Model

Our long history of profitable growth is founded on a commitment to a relatively simple business model: providing a broad base of customers with their basic everyday and household needs, supplemented with a variety of general merchandise items, at everyday low prices in conveniently located, small-box stores. We continually evaluate the needs and demands of our customers and modify our merchandise selections and pricing accordingly, while remaining focused on increasing profitability, cash generation and returns for our shareholders.

Our long-term operating priorities remain: 1) driving profitable sales growth, 2) capturing growth

opportunities, 3) enhancing our position as a low-cost operator, and 4) investing in our people as a competitive advantage. For more information on these operating priorities, see the “Executive Overview” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in Part II, Item 7 of this report.

In 2018, we achieved our 29th consecutive year of positive same-store sales growth. We believe that this

growth, which has taken place in a variety of economic conditions, is a result of our compelling value and convenience proposition, although no assurances can be given that we will achieve positive same-store sales growth in any given year.

Compelling Value and Convenience Proposition. Our ability to deliver highly competitive prices in

convenient locations and our easy “in and out” shopping format create a compelling shopping experience that we believe distinguishes us from other discount retailers as well as convenience, drug, grocery, online and mass merchant retailers. Our slogan “Save time. Save money. Every day!” summarizes our appeal to customers. We believe our ability to effectively deliver both value and convenience allows us to succeed in small markets with limited shopping alternatives, as well as in larger and more competitive markets. Our value and convenience proposition is evidenced by the following attributes of our business model:

• Everyday Low Prices on Quality Merchandise. Our research indicates that we offer a price

advantage over most food and drug retailers and that our prices are competitive with even the

2018 Form 10-K 5

largest discount retailers. Our ability to offer everyday low prices on quality merchandise is supported by our low-cost operating structure and our strategy to maintain a limited number of items per merchandise category, which we believe helps us maintain strong purchasing power. We offer nationally advertised brands at these everyday low prices in addition to offering our own private brands at substantially lower prices.

• Convenient Locations. Our stores are conveniently located in a variety of rural, suburban and urban communities. We seek to locate our stores in close proximity to our customers, which helps drive customer loyalty and trip frequency and makes us an attractive alternative to large discount and other large-box retail and grocery stores.

• Time-Saving Shopping Experience. We strive to provide customers with a highly convenient, easy to navigate shopping experience. Our small-box stores make it easier to get in and out quickly. Our product offering includes most necessities, such as basic packaged and refrigerated food and dairy products, cleaning supplies, paper products, health and beauty care items, tobacco products, greeting cards and other stationery items, basic apparel, housewares, hardware and automotive supplies, among others. Our convenient hours and broad merchandise offering allow our customers to fulfill their requirements for basic goods and minimize their need to shop elsewhere.

Substantial Growth Opportunities. We believe we have substantial long-term growth potential in the U.S. We have identified significant opportunities to add new stores in both existing and new markets. In addition, we have opportunities to relocate or remodel locations within our existing store base to better serve our customers. Our attractive store economics, including a relatively low initial investment and simple, low-cost operating model have allowed us to grow our store base to current levels and provide us significant opportunities to continue our profitable store growth strategy.

Our Merchandise

We offer a focused assortment of everyday necessities, which we believe helps to drive frequent

customer visits, and key items in a broad range of general merchandise categories. Our product assortment provides the opportunity for our customers to address most of their basic shopping needs with one trip. We offer a wide selection of nationally advertised brands from leading manufacturers. Additionally, our private brand products offer even greater value with options to purchase products that we believe to be of comparable quality to national brands as well as value items, each at substantial discounts to the national brands.

Consumables is our largest merchandise category and has become a larger percentage of our total sales in

recent years as indicated in the table below. Consumables include paper and cleaning products (such as paper towels, bath tissue, paper dinnerware, trash and storage bags, laundry and other home cleaning supplies); packaged food (such as cereals, canned soups and vegetables, condiments, spices, sugar and flour); perishables (such as milk, eggs, bread, refrigerated and frozen food, beer and wine); snacks (such as candy, cookies, crackers, salty snacks and carbonated beverages); health and beauty (such as over-the-counter medicines and personal care products including soap, body wash, shampoo, cosmetics, dental hygiene and foot care products); pet (such as pet supplies and pet food); and tobacco products.

Seasonal products include decorations, toys, batteries, small electronics, greeting cards, stationery,

prepaid phones and accessories, gardening supplies, hardware, automotive and home office supplies. Home products include kitchen supplies, cookware, small appliances, light bulbs, storage containers,

frames, candles, craft supplies and kitchen, bed and bath soft goods. Apparel includes casual everyday apparel for infants, toddlers, girls, boys, women and men, as well as

socks, underwear, disposable diapers, shoes and accessories.

6 2018 Form 10-K

The percentage of net sales of each of our four categories of merchandise for the fiscal years indicated below was as follows:

2018 2017 2016

Consumables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77.5 % 76.9 % 76.4 % Seasonal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.9 % 12.1 % 12.2 % Home products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.9 % 6.0 % 6.2 % Apparel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.7 % 5.0 % 5.2 %

Our seasonal and home products categories typically account for the highest gross profit margins, and the

consumables category typically accounts for the lowest gross profit margin.

The Dollar General Store

The typical Dollar General store is operated by a store manager, one or more assistant store managers, and three or more sales associates. Our stores generally feature a low-cost, no frills building with limited maintenance capital, low operating costs, and a focused merchandise offering within a broad range of categories, allowing us to deliver low retail prices while generating strong cash flows and capital investment returns. Our stores average approximately 7,400 square feet of selling space and approximately 75% of our stores are located in towns of 20,000 or fewer people. We generally have had good success in locating suitable store sites in the past, and we believe that there is ample opportunity for new store growth in existing and new markets. In addition, we believe we have significant opportunities available for our relocation and remodel programs.

Our store growth over the past three years is summarized in the following table:

Stores at Net Beginning Stores Stores Store Stores at Year of Year Opened Closed Increase End of Year

2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,483 900 63 837 13,320 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,320 1,315 101 1,214 14,534 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,534 900 64 836 15,370

Our Customers

Our customers seek value and convenience. Depending on their financial situation and geographic proximity, customers’ reliance on Dollar General varies from fill-in shopping, to making periodic trips to stock up on household items, to making weekly or more frequent trips to meet most essential needs. We generally locate our stores and plan our merchandise selections to best serve the needs of our core customers, the low and fixed income households often underserved by other retailers, and we are focused on helping them make the most of their spending dollars. At the same time, however, Dollar General shoppers from a wide range of income brackets and life stages appreciate our quality merchandise as well as our attractive value and convenience proposition. Our Suppliers

We purchase merchandise from a wide variety of suppliers and maintain direct buying relationships with

many producers of national brand merchandise. Despite our broad offering, we maintain only a limited number of items per category, allowing us to keep our average costs low. Our three largest suppliers each accounted for approximately 8% of our purchases in 2018. Our private brands come from a diversified supplier base. We directly imported approximately 6% of our purchases at cost in 2018.

We have consistently managed to obtain sufficient quantities of core merchandise and believe that, if one

or more of our current sources of supply became unavailable, we generally would be able to obtain alternative

2018 Form 10-K 7

sources; however, such alternative sources could increase our merchandise costs and supply chain lead time, result in a temporary reduction in store inventory levels, reduce our selection, or reduce the quality of our merchandise, and an inability to obtain alternative sources could adversely affect our sales.

Distribution and Transportation

Our stores are currently supported by distribution centers for non-refrigerated merchandise located strategically throughout our geographic footprint. We also have a distribution center in Amsterdam, New York under construction which is expected to be completed in 2019. We lease additional temporary warehouse space as necessary to support our distribution needs. We also have purchased a cold storage facility, and we are testing the self-distribution of fresh and frozen products, an initiative which we call “DG Fresh.” We continually analyze and rebalance the network to ensure that it remains efficient and provides the service levels our stores require. See “— Properties” below for additional information pertaining to our distribution centers.

Most of our merchandise flows through our distribution centers and is delivered to our stores by third-

party trucking firms, utilizing our trailers. We also own approximately 200 semi-trailer trucks with which we transport our merchandise. In addition, vendors or third-party distributors deliver or ship certain food items and other merchandise directly to our stores. Seasonality

Our business is somewhat seasonal. Generally, our most profitable sales mix occurs in the fourth quarter, which includes the Christmas selling season. In addition, our quarterly results can be affected by the timing of certain holidays, and the timing of new store openings and store closings, and the amount of sales contributed by new and existing stores. We typically purchase substantial amounts of inventory and incur higher shipping and payroll costs in the third quarter in anticipation of increased sales activity during the fourth quarter. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. Our Competition

We operate in the basic discount consumer goods market, which is highly competitive with respect to

price, customers, store location, merchandise quality, assortment and presentation, service offerings, in-stock consistency, customer service, promotional activity, employees, and market share. We compete with discount stores and many other retailers, including mass merchandise, warehouse club, grocery, drug, convenience, variety, online, and certain specialty stores. These other retail companies operate stores in many of the areas where we operate, and many of them engage in extensive advertising and marketing efforts. Our direct competitors include Family Dollar, Dollar Tree, Big Lots, Fred’s, 99 Cents Only and various local, independent operators, as well as Walmart, Target, Kroger, Aldi, Lidl, Walgreens, CVS, and RiteAid, among others. Certain of our competitors have greater financial, distribution, marketing and other resources than we do and may be able to secure better arrangements from suppliers than we can. Competition has intensified and we believe it will continue to do so as competitors move into or increase their presence in our geographic and product markets and increase the availability of mobile, web-based and other digital technology to facilitate a more convenient and competitive customer online and in-store shopping experience.

We believe that we differentiate ourselves from other forms of retailing by offering consistently low

prices in a convenient, small-store format. We believe that we are able to maintain competitive prices due in part to our low-cost operating structure and the relatively limited assortment of products offered. Purchasing large volumes of merchandise within our focused assortment in each merchandise category allows us to keep our average costs low, contributing to our ability to offer competitive everyday low prices to our customers. See “— Our Business Model” above for further discussion of our competitive situation.

8 2018 Form 10-K

Our Employees As of March 1, 2019, we employed approximately 135,000 full-time and part-time employees, including

divisional and regional managers, district managers, store managers, other store personnel and distribution center and administrative personnel. We have increasingly focused on recruiting, training, motivating and retaining employees, and we believe that the quality, performance and morale of our employees continue to be an important part of our success in recent years. We believe our overall relationship with our employees is good.

Our Trademarks

We own marks that are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and are protected

under applicable intellectual property laws. We attempt to obtain registration of our trademarks whenever practicable and to pursue vigorously any infringement of those marks. Our trademark registrations have various expiration dates; however, assuming that the trademark registrations are properly renewed, they have a perpetual duration. We also hold an exclusive license to the Rexall brand through at least March 5, 2026.

Available Information

Our Internet website address is www.dollargeneral.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into, and is not a part of, this Form 10-K. We file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, proxy statements and annual reports to shareholders, and, from time to time, registration statements and other documents. These documents are available free of charge to investors on or through the Investor Information section of our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with or furnish them to the SEC. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers, such as Dollar General, that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is http://www.sec.gov.

2018 Form 10-K 9

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Investment in our Company involves risks. You should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information in this report and other filings that we make from time to time with the SEC, including our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. These risks are not the only risks we face. Our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity could also be adversely affected by additional factors that apply to all companies generally or by risks not currently known to us or that we currently view to be immaterial. We can provide no assurance and make no representation that our risk mitigation efforts, although we believe they are reasonable, will be successful.

Economic factors may reduce our customers’ spending, impair our ability to execute our strategies and initiatives, and increase our costs and expenses, which could result in materially decreased sales or profitability.

Many of our customers have fixed or low incomes and limited discretionary spending dollars. Any factor that could adversely affect their disposable income could decrease our customers’ spending or cause them to shift their spending to our lower margin product choices, which could result in materially decreased sales and profitability. Factors that could reduce our customers’ disposable income include but are not limited to high unemployment or underemployment levels; inflation; higher fuel, energy, healthcare and housing costs, interest rates, consumer debt levels, and tax rates; tax law changes that negatively affect credits and refunds; lack of available credit; and decreases in, or elimination of, government subsidies such as unemployment and food assistance programs.

Many of the economic factors listed above, as well as commodity rates; transportation, lease and insurance costs; wage rates; foreign exchange rate fluctuations; measures that create barriers to or increase the costs of international trade (including increased import duties or tariffs); changes in applicable laws and regulations; and other economic factors, also could impair our ability to successfully execute our strategies and initiatives, as well as increase our cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses (including real estate costs), and may have other adverse consequences that we are unable to fully anticipate or control, all of which may materially decrease our sales or profitability.

Our plans depend significantly on strategies and initiatives designed to increase sales and profitability and improve the efficiencies, costs and effectiveness of our operations, and failure to achieve or sustain these plans could materially affect our results of operations.

We have short-term and long-term strategies and initiatives (such as those relating to merchandising, real estate and new store development, store formats, digital, shrink, sourcing, private brand, inventory management, supply chain, store operations, expense reduction, and technology) in various stages of testing, evaluation, and implementation, which are designed to continue to improve our results of operations and financial condition. The effectiveness of these initiatives is inherently uncertain, even when tested successfully, and is dependent on consistency of training and execution, workforce stability, ease of execution, and the absence of offsetting factors that can influence results adversely. Many of these factors are made even more challenging by the diverse geographic locations of our stores and distribution centers and our decentralized field management. Other risk factors described herein also could negatively affect general implementation. Failure to achieve successful or cost- effective implementation of our initiatives could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The success of our merchandising initiatives, particularly our non-consumable initiatives and efforts to increase sales of higher margin products within the consumables category, further depends in part upon our ability to predict the products that our customers will demand and to identify and timely respond to evolving trends in demographic mixes in our markets and consumer preferences. If we are unable to select and timely obtain

10 2018 Form 10-K

products that are attractive to customers and at costs that allow us to sell them at an acceptable profit, or to effectively market such products, it could result in materially decreased sales and profitability.

We are currently testing a cold chain self-distribution initiative, which we refer to as our DG Fresh initiative, and also testing an initiative we refer to as Fast Track, which is designed to enhance our in-store labor productivity, on-shelf availability, and customer convenience. The success of our DG Fresh initiative further depends in part on our ability to effectively transition these distribution operations from our current service providers without business disruption, as well as on the availability of certain supply chain resources, including temperature-controlled distribution centers, refrigerated transportation equipment, and drivers. The success of our Fast Track initiative further depends in part on vendor cooperation, successful implementation and maintenance of the necessary technology, customer interest and adoption, and our ability to gain cost efficiencies and control shrink levels from the initiative.

If we cannot timely and cost-effectively execute our real estate projects and meet our financial expectations, or if we do not anticipate or successfully address all of the challenges imposed by our expansion, including into new states or metro areas, it could materially impede our planned future growth and our profitability.

Delays in or failure to complete any of our real estate projects, or failure to meet our financial expectations for these projects, could materially adversely affect our growth and our profitability. Our ability to timely open, relocate and remodel profitable stores and expand into additional market areas is a key component of our planned future growth and may depend in part on: the availability of suitable store locations and capital funding; the absence of entitlement process or occupancy delays; the ability to negotiate acceptable lease and development terms, to cost-effectively hire and train new personnel, especially store managers, and to identify and accurately assess sufficient customer demand; and general economic conditions.

We also may not anticipate or successfully address all of the challenges imposed by the expansion of our operations, including into new states or metro areas where we have limited or no meaningful experience or brand recognition. Those areas may have different competitive and market conditions, consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns than our existing markets, as well as higher cost of entry and operating costs. These factors may cause our new stores to be less profitable than stores in our existing markets, which could slow future growth in these areas. In addition, many new stores will be located in areas where we have existing stores, which may result in inadvertent oversaturation and temporarily or permanently divert customers and sales from our existing stores, thereby adversely affecting our overall financial performance.

We face intense competition that could limit our growth opportunities and materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

The retail business is highly competitive with respect to price, customers, store location, merchandise quality, product assortment and presentation, service offerings, in-stock consistency, customer service, promotional activity, employees, and market share. We compete with discount stores and many other retailers, including mass merchandise, warehouse club, grocery, drug, convenience, variety, online retailers, and certain specialty stores. To maintain our competitive position, we may be required to lower prices, either temporarily or permanently, and may have limited ability to increase prices in response to increased costs, resulting in lower margins and reduced profitability. Certain of our competitors have greater financial, distribution, marketing and other resources, and may be able to secure better arrangements with suppliers, than we.

Competition has intensified, and is expected to continue to do so, as competitors enter or increase their presence in our geographic and product markets and expand availability of mobile, web-based and other digital technologies. We remain vulnerable to the risk that our competitors or others could enter our industry in a significant way, including through the introduction of new store formats. Further, consolidation or other business combinations or alliances within the retail industry could significantly alter the competitive dynamics of the retail

2018 Form 10-K 11

marketplace and result in competitors with greatly improved competitive positions, as well as competitors providing a wider variety of products and services at competitive prices, which could materially affect our financial performance. Our ability to effectively compete will depend substantially upon our continued ability to develop and execute compelling and cost-effective strategies and initiatives. If we fail to respond effectively to competitive pressures and industry changes, it could materially affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Inventory shrinkage may negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We experience significant inventory shrinkage. Although some level of inventory shrinkage is an unavoidable cost of doing business, if we were to experience higher rates of inventory shrinkage or incur increased security or other costs to combat inventory theft, our results of operations and financial condition could be affected adversely. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to reduce inventory shrinkage.

Our cash flows from operations, profitability and financial condition may be negatively affected if we are not successful in managing our inventory balances.

Our inventory balance represented approximately 53% of our total assets exclusive of goodwill and other intangible assets as of February 1, 2019. Efficient inventory management is a key component of our business success and profitability. We must maintain sufficient inventory levels and an appropriate product mix to meet our customers’ demands without allowing those levels to increase to such an extent that the costs to store and hold the goods unduly impacts our financial results or that increases the risk of inventory shrinkage. If we do not accurately predict customer trends or spending levels, or if we inappropriately price products, we may have to take unanticipated markdowns to dispose of the excess inventory, which also can adversely affect our financial results. We continue to focus on ways to reduce these risks, but we cannot make assurances that we will be successful in our inventory management. If we are not successful in managing our inventory balances, our cash flows from operations and financial condition may be negatively affected.

Failure to maintain the security of our business, customer, employee or vendor information could expose us to litigation, government enforcement actions and costly response measures, and could materially harm our reputation and affect our business and financial performance.

In connection with sales, we transmit confidential credit and debit card information which is encrypted using point-to-point encryption. We also have access to, collect or maintain certain private or confidential information regarding our customers, employees and their dependents, and vendors, as well as our business. Some of this information is stored electronically in connection with our e-commerce and mobile applications, some of which may leverage third-party service providers. Additionally, we may share information with select vendors that assist us in conducting our business. While we have implemented procedures and technology intended to protect such information and require appropriate controls of our service providers, cyberattackers could compromise such controls and obtain such information, as cyberattacks are becoming increasingly sophisticated and do not always immediately produce signs of intrusion. Moreover, employee error or malfeasance or other irregularities could result in a defeat of security measures and compromise our or our third-party vendors’ information systems. If cyberattackers obtain customer, employee or partner passwords through unrelated third-party breaches, these passwords could be used to gain access to their information or accounts with us.

Because we accept debit and credit cards for payment, we are subject to industry data protection standards and protocols, such as the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards, issued by the Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council. Nonetheless, we may be vulnerable to, and unable to detect and appropriately respond to, data security breaches and data loss, including cybersecurity attacks or other breaches of cardholder data.

12 2018 Form 10-K

A significant security breach of any kind experienced by us or one of our vendors, which could be undetected for a period of time, or a significant failure by us to comply with applicable privacy and information security laws, regulations and standards could expose us to risks of data loss, litigation, government enforcement actions, fines or penalties, credit card brand assessments, negative publicity and reputational harm, business disruption and costly response measures (for example, providing notification to, and credit monitoring services for, affected individuals, as well as further upgrades to our security measures) which may not be covered by or may exceed the coverage limits of our insurance policies, and could materially disrupt our operations. Any resulting negative publicity could significantly harm our reputation which could cause us to lose market share as a result of customers discontinuing the use of our e-commerce and mobile applications or debit or credit cards in our stores or not shopping in our stores altogether and could materially adversely affect our business and financial performance.

A significant disruption to our distribution network, the capacity of our distribution centers or the timely receipt of inventory could adversely affect sales or increase our transportation costs, which would decrease our profitability.

We rely on our distribution and transportation network to provide goods to our stores timely and cost-effectively. Using various transportation modes, including ocean, rail, and truck, we and our vendors move goods from vendor locations to our distribution centers and our stores. Any disruption, unanticipated or unusual expense or operational failure related to this process (for example, delivery delays or increases in transportation costs, including increased fuel costs, carrier or driver wages as a result of driver shortages; a decrease in transportation capacity for overseas shipments; labor shortages; or work stoppages for slowdowns) could negatively impact sales and profits. Labor shortages or work stoppages in the transportation industry or disruptions to the national and international transportation infrastructure that lead to delivery delays or that necessitate our securing alternative labor or shipping suppliers could also increase our costs or otherwise negatively affect our business.

We maintain a network of distribution facilities and are moving forward with plans to build or lease new facilities to support our growth objectives and strategic initiatives. Delays in opening such facilities could adversely affect our financial performance by slowing store growth, which may in turn reduce revenue growth, or by increasing transportation costs. In addition, distribution-related construction or expansion projects entail risks that could cause delays and cost overruns, such as: shortages of materials or skilled labor; work stoppages; unforeseen construction, scheduling, engineering, environmental or geological problems; weather interference; fires or other casualty losses; and unanticipated cost increases. For these reasons, the completion date and ultimate cost of these projects could differ significantly from initial expectations, and we cannot guarantee that any project will be completed on time or within established budgets.

Risks associated with or faced by our suppliers could adversely affect our financial performance.

We source our merchandise from a wide variety of domestic and international suppliers, and we depend on them to supply merchandise in a timely and efficient manner. In 2018, our three largest suppliers each accounted for approximately 8% of our purchases. If one or more of our current sources of supply became unavailable, we believe we would generally be able to obtain alternative sources, but it could increase our merchandise costs and supply chain lead time, result in a temporary reduction in store inventory levels, and reduce the quality of our merchandise. An inability to obtain alternative sources could materially decrease our sales. Additionally, if a supplier fails to deliver on its commitments, we could experience merchandise out-of-stocks that could lead to lost sales and reputational harm. Further, failure of suppliers to meet our compliance protocols could prolong our procurement lead time, resulting in lost sales and adverse margin impact.

We directly imported approximately 6% of our purchases (measured at cost) in 2018, but many of our domestic vendors directly import their products or components of their products. Changes to the prices and flow of these goods for any reason, such as political unrest, acts of war, currency fluctuations, disruptions in maritime lanes, port labor disputes, and economic conditions and instability in countries in which foreign suppliers are

2018 Form 10-K 13

located, the financial instability of suppliers, failure to meet our standards, issues with our suppliers’ labor practices or labor problems they may experience (such as strikes, stoppages or slowdowns, which could also increase labor costs during and following the disruption), the availability and cost of raw materials to suppliers, increased import duties, merchandise quality or safety issues, transport availability and cost, increases in wage rates and taxes, transport security, inflation, and other factors relating to suppliers and the countries in which they are located or from which they import, often are beyond our control and could adversely affect our operations and profitability. While we are working to diversify our sources of imported goods, a substantial amount of our imported merchandise comes from China, and thus, a change in the Chinese leadership, economic and market conditions, internal economic stimulus actions, or currency or other policies, as well as trade relations between China and the United States and increases in costs of labor and wage taxes, could negatively impact our merchandise costs. In addition, the United States’ foreign trade policies, duties, tariffs and other impositions on imported goods, trade sanctions imposed on certain countries (particularly China), import limitations on certain types of goods or of goods containing certain materials from other countries and other factors relating to foreign trade and port labor agreements are beyond our control. These and other factors affecting our suppliers and our access to products could adversely affect our business and financial performance. If we increase our product imports from foreign vendors, the risks associated with these imports also will increase, and we may be exposed to additional or different risks as we increase imports of goods produced in countries other than China.

Product liability, product recall or other product safety or labeling claims could adversely affect our business, reputation and financial performance.

We are dependent on our vendors to ensure that the products we buy from them comply with applicable product safety and labeling laws and regulations and to inform us of all applicable restrictions on the sale of such products. Nonetheless, product liability, personal injury or other claims may be asserted against us relating to product contamination, tampering, expiration, mislabeling, recall and other safety or labeling issues, including those relating to products that we may self-distribute through our DG Fresh initiative.

We seek but may not be successful in obtaining contractual indemnification and insurance coverage from our vendors. If we do not have adequate contractual indemnification or insurance available, such claims could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our ability to obtain indemnification from foreign vendors may be hindered by our ability to obtain jurisdiction over them to enforce contractual obligations. Even with adequate insurance and indemnification, such claims could significantly harm our reputation and consumer confidence in our products and we could incur significant litigation expenses, which also could materially affect our results of operations even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or not fully pursued.

A significant change in governmental regulations and requirements could materially increase our cost of doing business, and noncompliance with governmental regulations could materially adversely affect our financial performance.

We routinely incur significant costs in complying with numerous and frequently changing laws and regulations. The complexity of this regulatory environment and related compliance costs are increasing due to additional legal and regulatory requirements, our expanding operations, and increased enforcement efforts. New or revised laws, regulations, policies and related interpretations and enforcement practices, particularly those dealing with environmental compliance, product and food safety or labeling, information security and privacy, labor and employment, employee wages, and those governing the sale of products, may significantly increase our expenses or require extensive system and operating changes that could materially increase our cost of doing business. Violations of applicable laws and regulations or untimely or incomplete execution of a required product recall can result in significant penalties (including loss of licenses, eligibility to accept certain government benefits such as SNAP or significant fines), class action or other litigation, and reputational damage. Additionally, changes in tax laws, the interpretation of existing laws, or our failure to sustain our reporting positions on examination could adversely affect our overall effective tax rate.

14 2018 Form 10-K

Litigation may adversely affect our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our business is subject to the risk of litigation by employees, consumers, suppliers, competitors, shareholders, government agencies and others through private actions, class actions, multi-district litigation, administrative proceedings, regulatory actions or other litigation. The outcome of litigation, particularly class action or multi-district litigation and regulatory actions, is difficult to assess or quantify. Plaintiffs in these types of lawsuits may seek recovery of very large or indeterminate amounts, and the magnitude of the potential loss may remain unknown for lengthy periods of time. In addition, certain of these lawsuits, if decided adversely to us or settled by us, may result in liability material to our financial statements as a whole or may negatively affect our operating results if changes to our business operations are required. The cost to defend litigation may be significant, and adverse publicity could harm our reputation, regardless of the validity of the allegations. As a result, litigation may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. See also Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements.

Our current insurance program may expose us to unexpected costs and negatively affect our financial performance.

Our insurance coverage reflects deductibles, self-insured retentions, limits of liability and similar provisions that we believe are prudent based on our operations. However, there are types of losses we may incur but against which we cannot be insured or which we believe are not economically reasonable to insure, such as losses due to acts of war, certain crimes, including employee crime, certain wage and hour and other employment- related claims and litigation, actions based on certain consumer protection laws, and some natural and other disasters or similar events. If we incur material uninsured losses, our financial performance could suffer. Certain material events may result in sizable losses for the insurance industry and adversely affect the availability of adequate insurance coverage or result in excessive premium increases. To offset negative insurance market trends, we may elect to self-insure, accept higher deductibles or reduce the amount of coverage. In addition, we self- insure a significant portion of expected losses under our workers’ compensation, automobile liability, general liability (including claims made against certain of our landlords) and group health insurance programs. Significant changes in actuarial assumptions and management estimates underlying our recorded liabilities for these losses, including expected increases in medical and indemnity costs, could result in materially different expenses than expected under these programs, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Although we maintain property insurance for catastrophic events at our store support center and distribution centers, we are effectively self-insured for other property losses. If we experience a greater number of these losses than we anticipate, our financial performance could be adversely affected.

Natural disasters and unusual weather conditions (whether or not caused by climate change), pandemic outbreaks, terrorist acts, and global political events could disrupt business and result in lower sales and otherwise adversely affect our financial performance.

The occurrence of one or more natural disasters, such as hurricanes, fires, floods, tornadoes and earthquakes, unusual weather conditions, pandemic outbreaks, terrorist acts or disruptive global political events, such as civil unrest in countries in which our suppliers are located, or similar disruptions could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Unseasonal or significant weather conditions can affect consumer shopping patterns or prevent customers from reaching our stores, which could lead to lost sales or higher markdowns. If these events result in the closure of one or more of our distribution centers, a significant number of stores, or our corporate headquarters or impact one or more of our key suppliers, our operations and financial performance could be materially adversely affected through an inability to make deliveries or provide other support functions to our stores and through lost sales. These events also could result in increases in fuel or other energy prices, a fuel shortage, store opening delays, the temporary lack of an adequate work force in a market, the temporary or long-term disruption of product availability in our stores, and disruption of our utility services or information systems. These events may also increase the costs of insurance if they result in significant loss of property or other insurable damage.

2018 Form 10-K 15

Material damage or interruptions to our information systems as a result of external factors, staffing shortages or challenges in maintaining or updating our existing technology or developing or implementing new technology could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We depend on a variety of information technology systems, including systems owned and managed by third-party vendors, for the efficient functioning of our business, including, without limitation, transaction processing and the management of our employees, facilities, logistics, inventories, stores and customer-facing digital applications and operations. Our technology initiatives may not deliver desired results or may do so on a delayed schedule. Additionally, such systems are subject to damage or interruption from power surges and outages, facility damage, computer and telecommunications failures, malicious code (including computer viruses, worms, ransomware, or similar), cyberattacks (including account compromise; phishing; denial of service attacks; and application, network or system vulnerability exploitation), software upgrade failures or code defects, natural disasters and human error. Design defects or damage or interruption to these systems may require a significant investment to fix or replace, disrupt our operations, result in the loss or corruption of critical data, and harm our reputation, all of which could materially adversely affect our business or results of operations.

We also rely heavily on our information technology staff. Failure to meet these staffing needs may negatively affect our ability to fulfill our technology initiatives while continuing to provide maintenance on existing systems. We rely on third parties to maintain and periodically upgrade many of these systems so that they can continue to support our business. We license the software programs supporting many of our systems from independent software developers. The inability of these vendors, developers or us to continue to maintain and upgrade these systems and software programs could disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations if we were unable to convert to alternate systems in an efficient and timely manner and could expose us to greater risk of a cyberattack. In addition, costs and delays associated with the implementation of new or upgraded systems and technology or with maintenance or adequate support of existing systems could also disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations and adversely affect our profitability.

Failure to attract, train and retain qualified employees while controlling labor costs, as well as other labor issues, could adversely affect our financial performance.

Our future growth and performance, positive customer experience and legal and regulatory compliance depends on our ability to attract, train, retain and motivate qualified employees, many of whom are in positions with historically high rates of turnover. Our ability to meet our labor needs, while controlling our labor costs, is subject to many external factors, including competition for and availability of qualified personnel, unemployment levels, wage rates, minimum wage laws, health and other insurance costs, changes in employment and labor laws or other workplace regulations (including changes in employee benefit programs such as health insurance and paid leave programs), employee activism, and our reputation and relevance within the labor market. If we are unable to attract, train and retain adequate numbers of qualified employees, our operations, customer service levels, legal and regulatory compliance, and support functions could suffer. In addition, to the extent a significant portion of our employee base unionizes, or attempts to unionize, our labor costs could increase. Our ability to pass along labor costs to our customers is constrained by our everyday low price model, and we may not be able to offset such increased costs elsewhere in our business.

Our success depends on our executive officers and other key personnel. If we lose key personnel or are unable to hire additional qualified personnel, our business may be harmed.

Our future success depends to a significant degree on the skills, experience and efforts of our executive officers and other key personnel. The unexpected loss of the services of any of such persons could adversely affect our operations. There can be no assurance that our executive succession planning, retention or hiring efforts will be successful. Competition for skilled and experienced management personnel is intense, and our future success will also depend on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, and a failure to attract and retain new qualified personnel could adversely affect our operations.

16 2018 Form 10-K

Our private brands may not be successful in improving our gross profit rate and may increase certain of the risks we face.

The sale of private brand items is an important component of our sales growth and gross profit rate enhancement plans. Broad market acceptance of our private brands depends on many factors, including pricing, quality, customer perception, and timely development and introduction of new products. We cannot give assurance that we will achieve or maintain our expected level of private brand sales. The sale and expansion of these offerings also subjects us to or increases certain risks, such as: product liability claims and product recalls; disruptions in raw material and finished product supply and distribution chains; inability to successfully protect our proprietary rights; claims related to the proprietary rights of third parties; and other risks generally encountered by entities that source, sell and market exclusive branded offerings for retail. Failure to appropriately address these risks could materially adversely affect our private brand initiatives, reputation, results of operations and financial condition.

Because our business is somewhat seasonal, adverse events during the fourth quarter could materially affect our financial statements as a whole.

Primarily because of sales of Christmas-related merchandise, our most profitable sales mix generally occurs in the fourth quarter. In anticipation of this holiday, we purchase substantial amounts of seasonal inventory, and if sales fall below seasonal norms or expectations it could result in unanticipated markdowns. Adverse events, such as deteriorating economic conditions, high unemployment rates, high gas prices, public transportation disruptions, or unusual or unanticipated adverse weather could result in lower-than-planned sales during the Christmas selling season, which in turn could reduce our profitability and otherwise adversely affect our financial performance and operating results.

Deterioration in market conditions or changes in our credit profile could adversely affect our business operations and financial condition.

We rely on the positive cash flow we generate from our operating activities and our access to the credit and capital markets to fund our operations, growth strategy, and return of cash to our shareholders through share repurchases and dividends. Changes in the credit and capital markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity and interest rate fluctuations, may increase the cost of financing or restrict our access to these potential sources of future liquidity. Our continued access to liquidity sources on favorable terms depends on multiple factors, including our operating performance and credit ratings. Our debt securities currently are rated investment grade, and a downgrade of this rating likely would negatively impact our access to the debt capital markets and increase our cost of borrowing. As a result, disruptions in the debt markets or any downgrade of our credit ratings could adversely affect our business operations and financial condition and our ability to return cash to our shareholders. We can make no assurances that our ability to obtain additional financing through the debt markets will not be adversely affected by economic conditions or that we will be able to maintain or improve our current credit ratings.

New accounting guidance or changes in the interpretation or application of existing accounting guidance could adversely affect our financial performance.

The implementation of new accounting standards could require certain systems, internal process and controls and other changes that could increase our operating costs, and will result in changes to our financial statements. For example, the implementation of accounting standards related to leases, as issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, required us to make significant changes to our lease management and other accounting systems, and will result in a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to our business involve

2018 Form 10-K 17

many subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by our management. Changes in these rules or their interpretation or in underlying management assumptions, estimates or judgments could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance. The outcome of such changes could include litigation or regulatory actions which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

As of March 1, 2019, we operated 15,472 retail stores located in 44 states as follows:

State Number of Stores State Number of Stores

Alabama. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 760 Nebraska 123 Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 Nevada 22 Arkansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433 New Hampshire 36 California . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 New Jersey 133 Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 New Mexico 100 Connecticut . . . . . . . . . . . 56 New York 464 Delaware . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 North Carolina 817 Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 North Dakota 26 Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Ohio 798 Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 547 Oklahoma 442 Indiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 525 Oregon 52 Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 Pennsylvania 738 Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 Rhode Island 16 Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . 530 South Carolina 542 Louisiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . 559 South Dakota 52 Maine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 Tennessee 780 Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 Texas 1,485 Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . 45 Utah 11 Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . 519 Vermont 36 Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 Virginia 419 Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . 512 West Virginia 242 Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 518 Wisconsin 171

Most of our stores are located in leased premises. Individual store leases vary as to their terms, rental provisions and expiration dates. Many stores are subject to build-to-suit arrangements with landlords, which typically carry a primary lease term of up to 15 years with multiple renewal options. We also have stores subject to shorter-term leases and many of these leases have renewal options. A significant portion of our new stores are subject to build-to-suit arrangements.

18 2018 Form 10-K

As of March 1, 2019, we operated the following distribution centers for non-refrigerated merchandise:

Year Approximate Square Number of Location Opened Footage Stores Served

Scottsville, KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1959 720,000 776 Ardmore, OK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 1,310,000 1,070 South Boston, VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1997 1,250,000 1,065 Indianola, MS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1998 820,000 907 Fulton, MO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1999 1,150,000 1,272 Alachua, FL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2000 980,000 991 Zanesville, OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2001 1,170,000 1,189 Jonesville, SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2005 1,120,000 1,019 Marion, IN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2006 1,110,000 1,194 Bessemer, AL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 940,000 1,138 Lebec, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 600,000 444 Bethel, PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 1,000,000 1,115 San Antonio, TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 920,000 995 Janesville, WI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 1,000,000 883 Jackson, GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 1,000,000 905 Longview, TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 1,020,000 509

We lease the distribution centers located in California, Oklahoma, Mississippi and Missouri and own the

remaining distribution centers in the table above. Approximately 7.25 acres of the land on which our Kentucky distribution center is located is subject to a ground lease. As of February 1, 2019, we owned a cold storage and distribution facility of approximately 148,000 square feet and leased approximately 1,070,000 square feet of additional space to support our distribution needs.

Our executive offices are located in approximately 302,000 square feet of owned buildings and

approximately 42,000 square feet of leased office space in Goodlettsville, Tennessee.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The information contained in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements under the heading “Legal proceedings” contained in Part II, Item 8 of this report is incorporated herein by this reference.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

2018 Form 10-K 19

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT Information regarding our current executive officers as of March 21, 2019 is set forth below. Each of our

executive officers serves at the discretion of our Board of Directors and is elected annually by the Board to serve until a successor is duly elected. There are no familial relationships between any of our directors or executive officers.

Name Age Position Todd J. Vasos . . . . . . . . . . . 57 Chief Executive Officer and Director John W. Garratt . . . . . . . . . 50 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Michael J. Kindy . . . . . . . . 53 Executive Vice President, Global Supply Chain Jeffery C. Owen . . . . . . . . . 49 Executive Vice President, Store Operations Robert D. Ravener . . . . . . . 60 Executive Vice President and Chief People Officer Jason S. Reiser . . . . . . . . . . 50 Executive Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer Rhonda M. Taylor . . . . . . . 51 Executive Vice President and General Counsel Carman R. Wenkoff . . . . . . 51 Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer Anita C. Elliott . . . . . . . . . . 54 Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

Mr. Vasos has served as Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board since June 2015. He joined Dollar General in December 2008 as Executive Vice President, Division President and Chief Merchandising Officer. He was promoted to Chief Operating Officer in November 2013. Prior to joining Dollar General, Mr. Vasos served in executive positions with Longs Drug Stores Corporation for seven years, including Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (February 2008 – November 2008) and Senior Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer (2001 – 2008), where he was responsible for all pharmacy and front-end marketing, merchandising, procurement, supply chain, advertising, store development, store layout and space allocation, and the operation of three distribution centers. He also previously served in leadership positions at Phar-Mor Food and Drug Inc. and Eckerd Corporation.

Mr. Garratt has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since December 2015.

He joined Dollar General in October 2014 as Senior Vice President, Finance & Strategy and subsequently served as Interim Chief Financial Officer from July 2015 to December 2015. Prior to joining Dollar General, Mr. Garratt held various positions of increasing responsibility with Yum! Brands, Inc., one of the world’s largest restaurant companies, between May 2004 and October 2014, holding leadership positions in corporate strategy and financial planning. He served as Vice President, Finance and Division Controller for the KFC division and earlier for the Pizza Hut division and for Yum Restaurants International between October 2013 and October 2014. He also served as the Senior Director, Yum Corporate Strategy, from March 2010 to October 2013, reporting directly to the corporate Chief Financial Officer and leading corporate strategy as well as driving key cross-divisional initiatives. Mr. Garratt served in various other financial positions at Yum from May 2004 to March 2010. He served as Plant Controller for Alcoa Inc. between April 2002 and May 2004, and held various financial management positions at General Electric from March 1999 to April 2002. He began his career in May 1990 at Alcoa, where he served for approximately nine years.

Mr. Kindy has served as Executive Vice President, Global Supply Chain since August 2018. He joined

Dollar General as Vice President, Distribution Centers in December 2008, became Vice President, Transportation in May 2013, and was promoted to Senior Vice President, Global Supply Chain in June 2015. Prior to joining Dollar General, Mr. Kindy had 14 years of grocery distribution management and 5 years of logistics and distribution consulting experience. He served as Senior Director, Warehouse Operations, for ConAgra Foods from November 2007 to December 2008. Since beginning his career in July 1989, Mr. Kindy also held various distribution and warehouse leadership positions at Safeway, Inc., Crum & Crum Logistics, and Specialized Distribution Management, Inc., and served as a principal consultant for PricewaterhouseCoopers.

20 2018 Form 10-K

Mr. Owen returned to Dollar General in June 2015 as Executive Vice President of Store Operations, with over 21 years of previous employment experience with the Company. Prior to his departure from Dollar General in July 2014, he was Senior Vice President, Store Operations. Prior to August 2011, Mr. Owen served as Vice President, Division Manager. From November 2006 to March 2007, he served as Retail Division Manager. Prior to November 2006, he was Senior Director, Operations Process Improvement. Mr. Owen served the Company in various operations roles of increasing importance and responsibility from December 1992 to September 2004. Mr. Owen has served as a director of Kirkland’s Inc. since March 2015.

Mr. Ravener joined Dollar General as Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer in August 2008. He was promoted to Executive Vice President in March 2010. As previously announced, Mr. Ravener plans to retire from Dollar General effective May 27, 2019. Prior to joining Dollar General, he served in human resources executive roles with Starbucks Corporation from September 2005 until August 2008 as the Senior Vice President of U.S. Partner Resources and, prior to that, as the Vice President, Partner Resources—Eastern Division. As the Senior Vice President of U.S. Partner Resources at Starbucks, Mr. Ravener oversaw all aspects of human resources activity for more than 10,000 stores. Prior to serving at Starbucks, Mr. Ravener held Vice President of Human Resources roles for The Home Depot Inc. at its Store Support Center and a domestic field division from April 2003 to September 2005. Mr. Ravener also served in executive roles in both human resources and operations at Footstar, Inc. and roles of increasing leadership at PepsiCo, Inc.

Mr. Reiser has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer since July 2017.

Prior thereto, he served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc., a multi-channel specialty retailer and contract manufacturer of vitamins, minerals, herbs, specialty supplements, sports nutrition and other health and wellness products, from July 2016 to July 2017, where he was responsible for leading merchandising, operations, end-to-end supply chain, information technology, real estate and construction, planning, pricing and merchandising operations. He also previously served as Executive Vice President, Chief Merchandising Officer from January 2014 to June 2016 and as Senior Vice President, Hardlines Merchandising from July 2013 to January 2014, for discount retailer Dollar Tree, Inc. (successor to Family Dollar Stores, Inc.). Prior to his employment with Family Dollar, Mr. Reiser was employed by Walmart Stores, Inc. for 17 years in a variety of roles, including Vice President, Merchandising, Health & Family Care of Sam’s Club from November 2010 to June 2013; Vice President, Operations & Compliance, Health & Wellness of Sam’s Club from May 2010 to November 2010; Divisional Merchandise Manager, Wellness, from May 2009 to May 2010; Senior Buyer Pharmacy/OTC of Sam’s Club from November 2006 to May 2009; Director, Government Relations and Regulatory Affairs from August 2002 to November 2006; Pharmacy District Manager from August 2000 to August 2002; and Pharmacy Manager from October 1995 to August 2000.

Ms. Taylor has served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel since March 2015. She joined Dollar General as an Employment Attorney in March 2000 and was subsequently promoted to Senior Employment Attorney in 2001, Deputy General Counsel in 2004, Vice President and Assistant General Counsel in March 2010, and Senior Vice President and General Counsel in June 2013. Prior to joining Dollar General, she practiced law with Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., where her practice was focused on labor law and employment litigation. She has also held attorney positions with Ford & Harrison LLP and Stokes Bartholomew.

Mr. Wenkoff has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer since July 2017. Prior thereto, he served as the Chief Information Officer (May 2012 – June 2017) and Chief Digital Officer (June 2016 – June 2017) of Franchise World Headquarters, LLC (“Subway”), the largest string of sandwich shops in the world, where he was responsible for global technology and digital strategy, execution and operations for the Subway brand and all of its restaurants. He also owned a Subway franchise in Southport, Connecticut from July 2015 until October 2017. Prior to joining Subway, he served as the Chairman of the Board and Co-President of Retail Gift Card Association, a member organization of diverse, closed loop gift card retailers committed to promoting and protecting the use of gift cards, from February 2008 to May 2012. He also served as the Deputy Chief Information Officer for Independent Purchase Cooperative, Inc., an independent Subway franchisee-owned and operated purchasing and services cooperative, from May 2005 to May 2012, and as President of its subsidiary,

2018 Form 10-K 21

Value Pay Services LLC, from May 2005 to February 2011. He was the founder and President of Stored Value Management, Inc., an independently owned program and consulting company, from January 2004 to May 2005 and the Vice President, Operations and Finance, as well as General Counsel of Ontain Corporation, a technology company focused on providing turn-key retail merchant solutions, from January 2000 to December 2004. Mr. Wenkoff began his career in 1993 as an articled student, and then attorney with Douglas Symes & Brissenden and served in various legal positions, including General Counsel, with Pivotal Corporation from 1997 to 2000.

Ms. Elliott has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since December 2015. She joined Dollar General as Senior Vice President and Controller in August 2005. Prior to joining Dollar General, she served as Vice President and Controller of Big Lots, Inc. from May 2001 to August 2005, where she was responsible for accounting operations, financial reporting and internal audit. Prior to serving at Big Lots, she served as Vice President and Controller for Jitney-Jungle Stores of America, Inc. from April 1998 to March 2001. At Jitney-Jungle, Ms. Elliott was responsible for the accounting operations and the internal and external financial reporting functions. Prior to serving at Jitney-Jungle, she practiced public accounting for 12 years, 6 of which were with Ernst & Young LLP.

22 2018 Form 10-K

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “DG.” On March 18, 2019, there were approximately 2,556 shareholders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

We resumed the payment of quarterly cash dividends in 2015. Our Board of Directors most recently increased the amount of the quarterly cash dividend to $0.32 beginning with the dividend payable on April 23, 2019. While our Board of Directors currently expects to continue regular quarterly cash dividends, the declaration and amount of future cash dividends are subject to the Board’s sole discretion and will depend upon, among other things, our results of operations, cash requirements, financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that the Board may deem relevant in its sole discretion. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table contains information regarding purchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended February 1, 2019 by or on behalf of Dollar General or any “affiliated purchaser,” as defined by Rule 10b-18(a)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

Total Number Approximate of Shares Dollar Value Purchased of Shares that May Total Number Average as Part of Publicly Yet Be Purchased of Shares Price Paid Announced Plans Under the Plans Period Purchased per Share or Programs(a) or Programs(a)

11/03/18-11/30/18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — $ — — $ 706,116,000 12/01/18-12/31/18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,027,556 $ 104.04 3,027,556 $ 391,132,000 01/01/19-02/01/19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 407,492 $ 110.45 407,492 $ 346,124,000 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,435,048 $ 104.80 3,435,048 $ 346,124,000

(a) On September 5, 2012, the Company announced a program permitting the Company to repurchase a portion

of its outstanding shares not to exceed a dollar maximum established by the Company’s Board of Directors. The program was most recently amended on March 13, 2019 to increase the repurchase authorization by $1.0 billion, bringing the total value of authorized share repurchases under the program to $7.0 billion. Under the authorization, purchases may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time subject to market and other conditions. This repurchase authorization has no expiration date.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial and operating information of Dollar

General Corporation as of the dates and for the periods indicated. The selected historical statement of income data and statement of cash flows data for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2019, February 2, 2018, and February 3, 2017, and balance sheet data as of February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018, have been derived from our historical audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. The selected historical statement of income data and statement of cash flows data for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2016 and January 30, 2015 and balance sheet data as of February 3, 2017, January 29, 2016, and January 30, 2015 presented in this table have been derived from audited consolidated financial statements not included in this report.

The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by reference to, the

Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Part II, Item 8 of this report and the

2018 Form 10-K 23

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Part II, Item 7 of this report. Certain financial disclosures relating to prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

(Amounts in millions, excluding per share data, Year Ended number of stores, selling square feet, and net February 1, February 2, February 3, January 29, January 30, sales per square foot) 2019 2018 2017(1) 2016 2015

Statement of Income Data: Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25,625.0 $ 23,471.0 $ 21,986.6 $ 20,368.6 $ 18,909.6 Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,821.2 16,249.6 15,204.0 14,062.5 13,107.1 Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,803.9 7,221.4 6,782.6 6,306.1 5,802.5 Selling, general and administrative

expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,687.6 5,213.5 4,719.2 4,365.8 4,033.4 Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,116.3 2,007.8 2,063.4 1,940.3 1,769.1 Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99.9 97.0 97.8 86.9 88.2 Other (income) expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 3.5 — 0.3 — Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . 2,015.4 1,907.3 1,965.6 1,853.0 1,680.9 Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425.9 368.3 714.5 687.9 615.5 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,589.5 $ 1,539.0 $ 1,251.1 $ 1,165.1 $ 1,065.3 Earnings per share—basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5.99 $ 5.64 $ 4.45 $ 3.96 $ 3.50 Earnings per share—diluted . . . . . . . . . . . 5.97 5.63 4.43 3.95 3.49 Dividends per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.16 1.04 1.00 0.88 — Statement of Cash Flows Data: Net cash provided by (used in):

Operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,143.6 $ 1,802.1 $ 1,605.0 $ 1,391.7 $ 1,326.9 Investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (731.6) (645.0) (550.9) (503.4) (371.7) Financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,443.9) (1,077.6) (1,024.1) (1,310.2) (880.9)

Total capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . (734.4) (646.5) (560.3) (504.8) (374.0) Other Financial and Operating Data: Same store sales growth(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2 % 2.7 % 0.9 % 2.8 % 2.8 % Same store sales(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 23,854.0 $ 21,871.6 $ 20,348.1 $ 19,254.3 $ 17,818.7 Number of stores included in same store

sales calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,283 13,150 12,383 11,706 11,052 Number of stores (at period end) . . . . . . . 15,370 14,534 13,320 12,483 11,789 Selling square feet (in thousands at

period end) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113,755 107,821 98,943 92,477 87,205 Net sales per square foot(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 231 $ 227 $ 229 $ 226 $ 223 Consumables sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77.5 % 76.9 % 76.4 % 75.9 % 75.7 % Seasonal sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.9 % 12.1 % 12.2 % 12.4 % 12.4 % Home products sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.9 % 6.0 % 6.2 % 6.3 % 6.4 % Apparel sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.7 % 5.0 % 5.2 % 5.4 % 5.5 % Rent expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,159.1 $ 1,081.5 $ 942.4 $ 856.9 $ 785.2 Balance Sheet Data (at period end): Cash and cash equivalents and short-

term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 235.5 $ 267.4 $ 187.9 $ 157.9 $ 579.8 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,204.0 12,516.9 11,672.3 11,257.9 11,208.6 Long-term debt(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,864.7 3,006.0 3,211.5 2,970.6 2,725.1 Total shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,417.4 6,125.8 5,406.3 5,377.9 5,710.0

(1) The fiscal year ended February 3, 2017 was comprised of 53 weeks.

24 2018 Form 10-K

(2) Same-store sales are calculated based upon stores that were open at least 13 full fiscal months and remain open at the end of the reporting period. We include stores that have been remodeled, expanded or relocated in our same-store sales calculation. Changes in same-store sales are calculated based on the comparable 52 calendar weeks in the current and prior years.

(3) Net sales per square foot was calculated based on total sales for the preceding 12 months as of the ending date

of the reporting period divided by the average selling square footage during the period, including the end of the fiscal year, the beginning of the fiscal year, and the end of each of our three interim fiscal quarters.

(4) Debt issuance costs are reflected as a deduction from the corresponding debt liability for all periods

presented.

2018 Form 10-K 25

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This discussion and analysis should be read with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the Consolidated

Financial Statements and the notes thereto. It also should be read in conjunction with the Cautionary Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and the Risk Factors disclosures set forth in the Introduction and in Item 1A of this report, respectively. Executive Overview

We are among the largest discount retailers in the United States by number of stores, with 15,472 stores located in 44 states as of March 1, 2019, with the greatest concentration of stores in the southern, southwestern, midwestern and eastern United States. We offer a broad selection of merchandise, including consumable products such as food, paper and cleaning products, health and beauty products and pet supplies, and non-consumable products such as seasonal merchandise, home decor and domestics, and basic apparel. Our merchandise includes national brands from leading manufacturers, as well as our own private brand selections with prices at substantial discounts to national brands. We offer our customers these national brand and private brand products at everyday low prices (typically $10 or less) in our convenient small-box locations.

We believe our convenient store formats, locations, and broad selection of high-quality products at

compelling values have driven our substantial growth and financial success over the years and through a variety of economic cycles. We are mindful that the majority of our customers are value-conscious, and many have low and/or fixed incomes. As a result, we are intensely focused on helping our customers make the most of their spending dollars. Our core customers are often among the first to be affected by negative or uncertain economic conditions and among the last to feel the effects of improving economic conditions particularly when trends are inconsistent and of an uncertain duration. The primary macroeconomic factors that affect our core customers include the unemployment and underemployment rates, wage growth, fuel prices, changes in U.S. and global trade policy (including price increases from tariffs), and changes to certain government assistance programs, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Additionally, our customers are impacted by increases in those expenses that generally comprise a large portion of their household budget, such as rent and healthcare. Finally, significant unseasonable or unusual weather patterns can impact customer shopping behaviors.

We remain committed to the following long-term operating priorities as we consistently strive to improve

our performance while retaining our customer-centric focus: 1) driving profitable sales growth, 2) capturing growth opportunities, 3) enhancing our position as a low-cost operator, and 4) investing in our people as a competitive advantage.

We seek to drive profitable sales growth through initiatives aimed at increasing customer traffic and

average transaction amount. As we work to provide everyday low prices and meet our customers’ affordability needs, we remain focused on enhancing our margins through effective category management, inventory shrink reduction initiatives, private brands penetration, distribution and transportation efficiencies (including a test to self-distribute fresh and frozen products, which we call “DG Fresh”), global sourcing, and pricing and markdown optimization. Several of our sales-driving initiatives are also designed to capture growth opportunities and are discussed in more detail below.

Historically, our sales of consumables, which tend to have lower gross margins, have been the key

drivers of net sales and customer traffic, while sales of non-consumables, which tend to have higher gross margins, have contributed to more profitable sales growth and an increase in average transaction amount. Throughout 2018, our sales mix continued to shift slightly toward consumables, and, within consumables, slightly toward lower margin departments such as perishables and tobacco. While we expect some sales mix challenges to persist, certain of our initiatives are intended to address these trends, although there can be no assurance we will be successful in reversing them.

26 2018 Form 10-K

We continue to make progress on and invest in certain strategic initiatives that we believe will help drive profitable sales growth and capture long-term growth opportunities. Such opportunities include leveraging existing and developing new digital tools and technology to provide our customers with additional shopping access points and even greater convenience. Following an in-depth analysis, in 2018 we began testing a refreshed approach to our non-consumable product offerings. This non-consumables initiative is a merchandising strategy that offers a new, differentiated and limited assortment that will change throughout the year. As we look to roll out this initiative more broadly in 2019, our goal for this initiative is to continue to improve the shopping experience while delivering exceptional value within key areas of our non-consumable categories. In 2019, we also are testing two initiatives aimed at driving sales and enhancing our position as a low-cost operator, as discussed further below.

Tariffs currently in effect on products from China, as applied to both our direct imports and domestic

purchases, did not have a material impact on our financial results in fiscal 2018. The recently postponed increase in tariff rates applicable to products from China, if ultimately implemented, as well as any other future increase in tariff rates or the expansion of products subject to tariffs, may have a more significant impact on our business and on our customers’ budgets. We continue to work to minimize price increases to our customers and to mitigate the potential sales and margin impact of current and potential future tariffs through various merchandising efforts. There can be no assurance we will be successful in our efforts to mitigate these impacts in whole or in part.

To support our other operating priorities, we remain focused on capturing growth opportunities. In 2018,

we opened 900 new stores, remodeled 1,050 stores, and relocated 115 stores. For 2019, we plan to open approximately 975 new stores, remodel approximately 1,000 stores, and relocate approximately 100 stores for an approximate total of 2,075 real estate projects.

We continue to innovate within our channel and are able to utilize the most productive of our various

store formats based on the specific market opportunity. We expect that our traditional 7,300 square foot store format will continue to be the primary store layout for new stores, relocations and remodels in 2019. We expect approximately 500 of the planned 1,000 remodels in 2019 to use the higher-cooler-count store format that enables us to offer an increased selection of perishable items. In addition, our smaller format store (less than 6,000 square feet) allows us to capture growth opportunities in metropolitan areas as well as in rural areas with a low number of households. We continue to incorporate lessons learned from our various store formats and layouts into our existing store base with a goal of driving increased customer traffic, average transaction amount, same-store sales and overall store productivity.

To support our new store growth and drive productivity, we continue to make investments in our

traditional distribution center network for non-refrigerated merchandise. Most recently, we began shipping from our distribution center in Longview, Texas in January 2019. In addition, our distribution center in Amsterdam, New York is currently under construction, and we expect to begin shipping from this facility later in 2019.

We have established a position as a low-cost operator, always seeking ways to reduce or control costs

that do not affect our customers’ shopping experiences. We plan to continue enhancing this position over time while employing ongoing cost discipline to reduce certain expenses as a percentage of sales. Nonetheless, we seek to maintain flexibility to invest in the business as necessary to enhance our long-term profitability.

In 2019, we will be testing “DG Fresh”, a self-distribution model for fresh and frozen products that is

designed to enhance sales, reduce product costs, improve our in-stock position and enhance item assortment; and Fast Track, an initiative aimed at further enhancing our convenience proposition and in-stock position as well as increasing labor productivity within our stores. These and certain other strategic initiatives will require us to incur upfront expenses for which there may not be an immediate return in terms of sales or enhanced profitability.

Certain operating expenses such as wage rates and occupancy costs have continued to increase in recent

years. While we expect these increases to persist, certain of our initiatives and plans are intended to help offset these challenges, although there can be no assurance we will be successful in mitigating them.

2018 Form 10-K 27

Our employees are a competitive advantage, and we proactively seek ways to continue investing in them. Our goal is to create an environment that attracts and retains talented personnel, particularly at the store level, because employees who are promoted from within our company generally have longer tenures and are greater contributors to improvements in our financial performance. We believe our investments in compensation and training for our store managers have contributed to improved customer experience scores, higher sales and improved turnover metrics.

To further enhance shareholder return, we repurchased shares of our common stock and paid quarterly

cash dividends throughout 2018. In 2019, we intend to continue our share repurchase activity, and to pay quarterly cash dividends, subject to Board discretion and approval.

A continued focus on our four operating priorities as discussed above, coupled with strong cash flow

management and share repurchases resulted in solid overall operating and financial performance in 2018 as compared to 2017, as set forth below. Basis points, as referred to below, are equal to 0.01% as a percentage of net sales.

• Net sales in 2018 increased 9.2% over 2017. Sales in same-stores increased 3.2%, primarily due

to an increase in average transaction amount. Average sales per square foot in 2018 were $231 compared to $227 in 2017.

• Our gross profit rate decreased by 32 basis points due primarily to higher markdowns, a greater

proportion of sales of consumables compared to non-consumables, and increased transportation costs.

• SG&A decreased by 1 basis point and was impacted by reduced repairs and maintenance

expenses offset by increases in occupancy costs and depreciation expenses. • Operating profit increased 5.4% to $2.12 billion in 2018 compared to $2.01 billion in 2017. • The increase in the effective income tax rate to 21.1% in 2018 from 19.3% in 2017 was due

primarily to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities in 2017 related to tax reform.

• We reported net income of $1.59 billion, or $5.97 per diluted share, for 2018 compared to net

income of $1.54 billion, or $5.63 per diluted share, for 2017. • We generated approximately $2.14 billion of cash flows from operating activities in 2018, an

increase of 18.9% compared to 2017 as described in detail below. We primarily utilized our cash flows from operating activities to invest in the growth of our business, repurchase our common stock, and pay quarterly cash dividends.

• Inventory turnover was 4.6 times on a rolling four-quarter basis. Inventories increased 7.3% on a

per store basis compared to 2017. • We repurchased approximately 9.9 million shares of our outstanding common stock for

$1.0 billion. Readers should refer to the detailed discussion of our operating results below for additional comments on

financial performance in the current year as compared with the prior years presented.

28 2018 Form 10-K

Results of Operations Accounting Periods. The following text contains references to years 2018, 2017, and 2016, which

represent fiscal years ended February 1, 2019, February 2, 2018, and February 3, 2017, respectively. Our fiscal year ends on the Friday closest to January 31. Fiscal years 2018 and 2017 were 52-week accounting periods and fiscal year 2016 was a 53-week accounting period.

Seasonality. The nature of our business is somewhat seasonal. Primarily because of sales of Christmas-

related merchandise, operating profit in our fourth quarter (November, December and January) has historically been higher than operating profit achieved in each of the first three quarters of the fiscal year. Expenses, and to a greater extent operating profit, vary by quarter. Results of a period shorter than a full year may not be indicative of results expected for the entire year. Furthermore, the seasonal nature of our business may affect comparisons between periods.

The following table contains results of operations data for fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016, and the

dollar and percentage variances among those years.

2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016 (amounts in millions, except Amount % Amount % per share amounts) 2018 2017 2016 Change Change Change Change Net sales by category: Consumables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19,865.1 $ 18,054.8 $ 16,798.9 $ 1,810.3 10.0 % $ 1,255.9 7.5 % % of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77.52 % 76.92 % 76.41 % Seasonal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,050.3 2,837.3 2,674.3 213.0 7.5 163.0 6.1 % of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.90 % 12.09 % 12.16 % Home products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,506.1 1,400.6 1,373.4 105.4 7.5 27.2 2.0 % of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.88 % 5.97 % 6.25 % Apparel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,203.6 1,178.3 1,140.0 25.4 2.2 38.3 3.4 % of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.70 % 5.02 % 5.18 % Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25,625.0 $ 23,471.0 $ 21,986.6 $ 2,154.1 9.2 % $ 1,484.4 6.8 % Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,821.2 16,249.6 15,204.0 1,571.6 9.7 1,045.6 6.9 % of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69.55 % 69.23 % 69.15 % Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,803.9 7,221.4 6,782.6 582.5 8.1 438.7 6.5 % of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.45 % 30.77 % 30.85 % Selling, general and administrative

expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,687.6 5,213.5 4,719.2 474.0 9.1 494.4 10.5 % of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.20 % 22.21 % 21.46 % Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,116.3 2,007.8 2,063.4 108.5 5.4 (55.6) (2.7) % of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.26 % 8.55 % 9.39 % Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99.9 97.0 97.8 2.8 2.9 (0.8) (0.8) % of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.39 % 0.41 % 0.44 % Other (income) expense . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 3.5 — (2.5) — 3.5 — % of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.00 % 0.01 % 0.00 % Income before income taxes . . . . . . 2,015.4 1,907.3 1,965.6 108.1 5.7 (58.3) (3.0) % of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.87 % 8.13 % 8.94 % Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425.9 368.3 714.5 57.6 15.6 (346.2) (48.5) % of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.66 % 1.57 % 3.25 % Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,589.5 $ 1,539.0 $ 1,251.1 $ 50.5 3.3 % $ 287.8 23.0 % % of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.20 % 6.56 % 5.69 % Diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . $ 5.97 $ 5.63 $ 4.43 $ 0.34 6.0 % $ 1.20 27.1 %

Net Sales. The net sales increase in 2018 reflects a same-store sales increase of 3.2% compared to 2017.

Same-stores include stores that have been open for at least 13 months and remain open at the end of the reporting period. Changes in same-store sales are calculated based on the comparable calendar weeks in the prior year, and include stores that have been remodeled, expanded or relocated. In 2018, our 14,283 same-stores accounted for sales of $23.9 billion. The increase in same-store sales primarily reflects an increase in average transaction amount

2018 Form 10-K 29

relative to 2017. The increase in average transaction amount was driven by higher average item retail prices and to a lesser extent, an increase in average items per transaction, while customer traffic was essentially unchanged. Same-store sales in 2018 increased in the consumables, seasonal and home products categories, and declined in the apparel category, compared to 2017. Same-store sales results in 2018 for the three non-consumables categories, when aggregated, were positive. The 2018 net sales increase was positively affected by new stores, modestly offset by sales from closed stores.

The net sales increase in 2017 reflects a same-store sales increase of 2.7% compared to 2016. In 2017,

our 13,150 same-stores accounted for sales of $21.9 billion. The increase in same-store sales was due to increases in average transaction amount and customer traffic relative to 2016. Same-store sales in 2017 increased in the consumables and seasonal categories, and declined in the home products and apparel categories, compared to 2016. Same-store sales results in 2017 for the three non-consumables categories, when aggregated, were positive. Net sales for the 53rd week of 2016 totaled $398.7 million. The 2017 net sales increase was positively affected by new stores, modestly offset by sales from closed stores.

Of our four major merchandise categories, the consumables category, which generally has a lower gross

profit rate than the other three categories, has grown most significantly over the past several years. Because of the impact of sales mix on gross profit, we continually review our merchandise mix and strive to adjust it when appropriate.

Gross Profit. For 2018, gross profit increased by 8.1%, and as a percentage of net sales decreased by

32 basis points to 30.5% compared to 2017. Higher markdowns, a greater proportion of sales of consumables, which generally have a lower gross profit rate than our other product categories, and sales of lower margin products comprising a higher proportion of consumables sales, as well as increases in transportation costs and an increased LIFO provision reduced the gross profit rate. These factors were partially offset by an improved rate of inventory shrinkage and higher initial markups on inventory purchases.

For 2017, gross profit increased by 6.5%, and as a percentage of net sales decreased by 8 basis points to

30.8% compared to 2016. A greater proportion of sales of consumables, which generally have a lower gross profit rate than our other product categories, and sales of lower margin products comprising a higher proportion of consumables sales, reduced the gross profit rate. Higher markdowns, which were primarily for promotional activities, and increases in transportation costs also reduced the gross profit rate, and these factors were partially offset by higher initial markups on inventory purchases and an improved rate of inventory shrinkage.

SG&A. SG&A as a percentage of sales decreased by 1 basis point, rounding to 22.2% in both 2018 and

2017. The 2018 amounts reflect a reduction in repairs and maintenance expenses which were offset by occupancy costs and depreciation expenses, each of which increased at a rate greater than the increase in net sales. The 2018 amounts reflect an increase in hurricane and other disaster-related expenses of approximately $14.3 million compared to 2017. The 2017 amounts include costs of $24.0 million related to the closure of 35 underperforming stores, primarily expenses for remaining lease liabilities.

SG&A as a percentage of sales was 22.2% in 2017 compared to 21.5% in 2016, an increase of 75 basis

points. The 2017 amounts reflect increased retail labor expenses, which includes our investment in store manager compensation, increased occupancy costs, and higher incentive compensation, each of which increased at a rate greater than the increase in net sales. Partially offsetting these increased expenses were reduced advertising costs, and costs that increased at a rate less than the increase in net sales, including utilities and waste management costs primarily resulting from our recycling efforts. The 2017 amounts include costs related to the closure of 35 underperforming stores discussed above. The 2017 amounts also reflect an increase in hurricane and other disaster-related expenses of approximately $18.0 million compared to 2016. SG&A as a percentage of sales was favorably impacted in 2016 by increased sales including the 53rd week discussed above, among other factors.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $2.8 million to $99.9 million in 2018 compared to 2017

primarily due to higher average interest rates which was partially offset by a decrease in average debt outstanding.

30 2018 Form 10-K

Interest expense decreased $0.8 million to $97.0 million in 2017 compared to 2016. See the detailed discussion under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” regarding the financing of various long-term obligations.

We had consolidated outstanding variable-rate debt of $373.3 million and $612.5 million as of

February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018, respectively, and the remainder of our outstanding indebtedness as of each of those dates was fixed rate debt.

Other (income) expense. Other (income) expense in 2018 reflects expenses associated with the voluntary

prepayment of our senior unsecured term loan facility, and in 2017 reflects expenses associated with the issuance and refinancing of long-term debt.

Income Taxes. The effective income tax rates for 2018, 2017, and 2016 were expenses of 21.1%, 19.3%,

and 36.3%, respectively. Under accounting standards for income taxes, the impact of new tax legislation must be taken into

account in the period in which the new legislation is enacted, including the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities at the tax rates at which such items are expected to reverse in future periods. Subsequent to the signing of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”), the Securities and Exchange Commission staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”), which allows companies to record provisional amounts during a measurement period not to extend beyond one year after the enactment date while the accounting impact is still under analysis. Our 2017 provision for income taxes reflected such estimates due to the changes in income tax law, including a provisional tax benefit of $335 million. The provisional tax benefit consisted of $310.8 million related to the one-time remeasurement of the federal portion of our deferred tax assets and liabilities at the 21% rate and $24.2 million related to the reduced statutory tax rate of 33.7%, compared to 35% in prior years. We concluded our analysis of the accounting impact of the Act pursuant to SAB 118 and recorded immaterial adjustments related to our 2017 provision for income taxes in 2018.

The effective income tax rate for 2018 was 21.1% compared to a rate of 19.3% for 2017 which represents

a net increase of 1.8 percentage points. The effective income tax rate was higher in 2018 primarily due to the one- time remeasurement of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at 21% in 2017, which was offset by the reduction in the current federal tax rate from 33.7% in 2017 to 21% in 2018.

The effective income tax rate for 2017 was 19.3% compared to a rate of 36.3% for 2016 which represents

a net decrease of 17.0 percentage points. The effective income tax rate was lower in 2017 primarily due to the one-time remeasurement of the federal portions of our deferred tax assets and liabilities at 21%, accompanied by the changes in the federal income tax laws pursuant to the Act that lowered our statutory federal tax rate to 33.7% for the 2017 fiscal year, compared to 35% in 2016.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are not party to any material off balance sheet arrangements.

Effects of Inflation In 2018, we experienced increases in certain product costs due in part to tariffs on certain items imported

from China. We experienced minimal overall commodity cost inflation or deflation in 2017. In 2016, we experienced product cost deflation reflecting reductions in commodity costs primarily related to food products.

2018 Form 10-K 31

Liquidity and Capital Resources Current Financial Condition and Recent Developments

During the past three years, we have generated an aggregate of approximately $5.6 billion in cash flows

from operating activities and incurred approximately $1.9 billion in capital expenditures. During that period, we expanded the number of stores we operate by 2,887, representing growth of approximately 23%, and we remodeled or relocated 2,835 stores, or approximately 23% of the stores we operated as of the beginning of the period. In 2019, we intend to continue our current strategy of pursuing store growth, remodels and relocations.

At February 1, 2019, we had a $1.25 billion unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “Revolving

Facility”), $2.5 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes, and a commercial paper program that may provide borrowing availability of up to $1.0 billion. At February 1, 2019, we had total consolidated outstanding debt (including the current portion of long-term obligations) of $2.9 billion, which includes commercial paper borrowings (“CP Notes”) and senior notes, all of which are described in greater detail below. Our borrowing availability under the Revolving Facility may be effectively limited by our CP Notes as further described below. The information contained in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this report is incorporated herein by reference.

We believe our cash flow from operations, and our existing cash balances, combined with availability

under the Revolving Facility, CP Notes and access to the debt markets, will provide sufficient liquidity to fund our current obligations, projected working capital requirements, capital spending and anticipated dividend payments for a period that includes the next twelve months as well as the next several years. However, our ability to maintain sufficient liquidity may be affected by numerous factors, many of which are outside of our control. Depending on our liquidity levels, conditions in the capital markets and other factors, we may from time to time consider the issuance of debt, equity or other securities, the proceeds of which could provide additional liquidity for our operations.

For fiscal 2019, we anticipate potential combined borrowings under the Revolving Facility and CP Notes

to be a maximum of approximately $800 million outstanding at any one time, including any anticipated borrowings to fund repurchases of common stock.

Revolving Credit Facility

On February 22, 2017, we entered into the Revolving Facility of which up to $175.0 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit and which is scheduled to mature on February 22, 2022.

Borrowings under the Revolving Facility bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable interest rate margin

plus, at our option, either (a) LIBOR or (b) a base rate (which is usually equal to the prime rate). The applicable interest rate margin for borrowings as of February 1, 2019 was 1.10% for LIBOR borrowings and 0.10% for base- rate borrowings. We must also pay a facility fee, payable on any used and unused commitment amounts of the Revolving Facility, and customary fees on letters of credit issued under the Revolving Facility. As of February 1, 2019, the commitment fee rate was 0.15%. The applicable interest rate margins for borrowings, the facility fees and the letter of credit fees under the Revolving Facility are subject to adjustment from time to time based on our long-term senior unsecured debt ratings.

The Revolving Facility contains a number of customary affirmative and negative covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, our (including our subsidiaries’) ability to: incur additional liens; sell all or substantially all of our assets; consummate certain fundamental changes or change in our lines of business; and incur additional subsidiary indebtedness. The Revolving Facility also contains financial covenants that require the maintenance of a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. As of February 1, 2019, we were in compliance with all such covenants. The Revolving Facility also contains customary events of default.

32 2018 Form 10-K

As of February 1, 2019, under the Revolving Facility, we had no outstanding borrowings, outstanding letters of credit of $7.6 million, and borrowing availability of $1.2 billion that, due to our intention to maintain borrowing availability related to the commercial paper program described below, could contribute incremental liquidity of $689.5 million at February 1, 2019. In addition, as of February 1, 2019 we had outstanding letters of credit of $32.9 million which were issued pursuant to separate agreements. Commercial Paper

As of February 1, 2019, our consolidated balance sheet reflected outstanding unsecured CP Notes of $366.9 million classified as long-term obligations due to our intent and ability to refinance these obligations as long-term debt. An additional $186.0 million of outstanding CP Notes were held by a wholly-owned subsidiary and are therefore not reflected on the consolidated balance sheet. Under this program, we may issue the CP Notes from time to time in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1.0 billion outstanding at any time. The CP Notes may have maturities of up to 364 days from the date of issue and rank equal in right of payment with all of our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. We intend to maintain available commitments under the Revolving Facility in an amount at least equal to the amount of CP Notes outstanding at any time. As of February 1, 2019, the consolidated outstanding CP Notes had a weighted average borrowing rate of 2.7%. Senior Notes

In April 2013 we issued $900.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.25% senior notes due 2023 (the “2023 Senior Notes”) at a discount of $2.4 million, which are scheduled to mature on April 15, 2023. In October 2015 we issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.150% senior notes due 2025 (the “2025 Senior Notes”) at a discount of $0.8 million, which are scheduled to mature on November 1, 2025. In April 2017 we issued $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.875% senior notes due 2027 (the “2027 Senior Notes”) at a discount of $0.4 million, which are scheduled to mature on April 15, 2027. In April 2018 we issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.125% senior notes due 2028 (the “2028 Senior Notes”) at a discount of $0.5 million, which are scheduled to mature on May 1, 2028. Collectively, the 2023 Senior Notes, 2025 Senior Notes, 2027 Senior Notes and 2028 Senior Notes comprise the “Senior Notes”, each of which were issued pursuant to an indenture as supplemented and amended by supplemental indentures relating to each series of Senior Notes (as so supplemented and amended, the “Senior Indenture”). Interest on the 2023 Senior Notes and the 2027 Senior Notes is payable in cash on April 15 and October 15 of each year. Interest on the 2025 and 2028 Senior Notes is payable in cash on May 1 and November 1 of each year. Interest payments on the 2028 Senior Notes commenced on November 1, 2018.

We may redeem some or all of the Senior Notes at any time at redemption prices set forth in the Senior Indenture. Upon the occurrence of a change of control triggering event, which is defined in the Senior Indenture, each holder of our Senior Notes has the right to require us to repurchase some or all of such holder’s Senior Notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the repurchase date.

The Senior Indenture contains covenants limiting, among other things, our ability (subject to certain exceptions) to consolidate, merge, or sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets; and our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to incur or guarantee indebtedness secured by liens on any shares of voting stock of significant subsidiaries.

The Senior Indenture also provides for events of default which, if any of them occurs, would permit or require the principal of and accrued interest on our Senior Notes to become or to be declared due and payable, as applicable.

2018 Form 10-K 33

Rating Agencies Our senior unsecured debt is rated “Baa2,” by Moody’s with a stable outlook and “BBB” by Standard &

Poor’s with a stable outlook, and our commercial paper program is rated “P-2” by Moody’s and “A-2” by Standard and Poor’s. Our current credit ratings, as well as future rating agency actions, could (i) impact our ability to finance our operations on satisfactory terms; (ii) affect our financing costs; and (iii) affect our insurance premiums and collateral requirements necessary for our self-insured programs. There can be no assurance that we will maintain or improve our current credit ratings.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations and commercial commitments as

of February 1, 2019 (in thousands):

Payments Due by Period Contractual obligations Total < 1 year 1 - 3 years 3 - 5 years 5+ years

Long-term debt obligations . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,873,260 $ 367,425 $ 1,135 $ 901,245 $ 1,603,455 Capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,977 1,425 2,736 1,964 4,852 Interest(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 658,016 104,549 188,700 165,256 199,511 Self-insurance liabilities(b) . . . . . . . . . . 237,762 107,530 84,780 30,090 15,362 Operating lease obligations(c). . . . . . . . 9,846,283 1,185,608 2,209,060 1,933,113 4,518,502

Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,626,298 $ 1,766,537 $ 2,486,411 $ 3,031,668 $ 6,341,682

Commitments Expiring by Period Commercial commitments(d) Total < 1 year 1 - 3 years 3 - 5 years 5+ years

Letters of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 11,642 $ 11,642 $ — $ — $ — Purchase obligations(e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,006,783 1,006,783 — — —

Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,018,425 $ 1,018,425 $ — $ — $ — Total contractual obligations and commercial commitments(f) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 14,644,723 $ 2,784,962 $ 2,486,411 $ 3,031,668 $ 6,341,682

(a) Represents obligations for interest payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations, and includes

projected interest on variable rate long-term debt, using 2018 year end rates and balances. Variable rate long- term debt includes the Revolving Facility (although such facility had a balance of zero as of February 1, 2019), the CP Notes (which had a balance of $366.9 million as of February 1, 2019, which amount is net of $186 million held by a wholly-owned subsidiary), and the balance of an outstanding tax increment financing of $6.4 million.

(b) We retain a significant portion of the risk for our workers’ compensation, employee health, general liability,

property loss, automobile, and third-party landlord claims exposures. As these obligations do not have scheduled maturities, these amounts represent undiscounted estimates based upon actuarial assumptions. Substantially all amounts are reflected on an undiscounted basis in our consolidated balance sheets.

(c) Operating lease obligations are inclusive of amounts included in deferred rent in our consolidated balance

sheets. (d) Commercial commitments include information technology license and support agreements, supplies, fixtures,

letters of credit for import merchandise, and other inventory purchase obligations. (e) Purchase obligations include legally binding agreements for software licenses and support, supplies, fixtures,

and merchandise purchases (excluding such purchases subject to letters of credit).

34 2018 Form 10-K

(f) We have potential payment obligations associated with uncertain tax positions that are not reflected in these totals. We are currently unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the period of cash settlement with the taxing authorities for the $6.7 million of reserves for uncertain tax positions.

Share Repurchase Program

Our existing common stock repurchase program had a total remaining authorization of approximately

$346 million at February 1, 2019. Our Board of Directors increased by $1.0 billion the authorization available under this common stock repurchase program on March 13, 2019. Under the authorization, purchases may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time subject to market and other conditions. The authorization has no expiration date and may be modified or terminated from time to time at the discretion of our Board of Directors. For more detail about our share repurchase program, see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.

Other Considerations

On March 13, 2019, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.32 per share which is payable on or before April 23, 2019 to shareholders of record of our common stock on April 9, 2019. We paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.29 per share in 2018. Although the Board currently expects to continue regular quarterly cash dividends, the declaration and amount of future cash dividends are subject to the Board’s sole discretion and will depend upon, among other factors, our results of operations, cash requirements, financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that our Board may deem relevant in its sole discretion.

Our inventory balance represented approximately 53% of our total assets exclusive of goodwill and other

intangible assets as of February 1, 2019. Our ability to effectively manage our inventory balances can have a significant impact on our cash flows from operations during a given fiscal year. Inventory purchases are often somewhat seasonal in nature, such as the purchase of warm-weather or Christmas-related merchandise. Efficient management of our inventory has been and continues to be an area of focus for us.

As described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, we are involved in a number of legal

actions and claims, some of which could potentially result in material cash payments. Adverse developments in those actions could materially and adversely affect our liquidity.

Cash Flows

Cash flows from operating activities. Cash flows from operating activities were $2.1 billion in 2018,

which represents a $341.4 million increase compared to 2017. Changes in accounts payable resulted in a $375.2 million increase in 2018 compared to a $427.9 million increase in 2017, due primarily to the timing of receipts and payments which was partially impacted by certain changes in payment terms. In addition, net income increased by $50.5 million in 2018 over 2017. These items were offset by changes in merchandise inventories which resulted in a $521.3 million decrease in 2018 as compared to a decrease of $348.4 million in 2017. Changes in income taxes in 2018 compared to 2017 are primarily due to the reduction in the federal income tax rate to 21% from 35% and the timing of payments for income taxes.

Cash flows from operating activities were $1.8 billion in 2017, which represents a $197.1 million

increase compared to 2016. Net income increased by $287.8 million in 2017 over 2016, offset by changes in merchandise inventories which resulted in a $348.4 million decrease in 2017 as compared to a decrease of $171.9 million in 2016. Changes in accounts payable resulted in a $427.9 million increase in 2017 compared to a $56.5 million increase in 2016, due primarily to the timing of receipts and payments which was partially impacted by certain changes in payment terms.

On an ongoing basis, we closely monitor and manage our inventory balances, and they may fluctuate

from period to period based on new store openings, the timing of purchases, and other factors. Merchandise

2018 Form 10-K 35

inventories increased by 14% in 2018, by 11% in 2017 and by 6% in 2016. Inventory levels in the consumables category increased by $320.9 million, or 14%, in 2018, by $322.9 million, or 16%, in 2017, and by $54.5 million, or 3% in 2016. The seasonal category increased by $108.4 million, or 17%, in 2018, by $14.9 million, or 2%, in 2017, and by $79.5 million, or 15%, in 2016. The home products category increased by $24.0 million, or 7%, in 2018, by $10.6 million, or 3%, in 2017, and by $40.8 million, or 14%, in 2016. The apparel category increased by $34.7 million, or 10%, in 2018, by $1.9 million, or 1%, in 2017, and by $9.9 million, or 3%, in 2016.

Cash flows from investing activities. Significant components of property and equipment purchases in

2018 included the following approximate amounts: $289 million for improvements, upgrades, remodels and relocations of existing stores; $242 million for distribution and transportation-related projects; $138 million for new leased stores, primarily for leasehold improvements, fixtures and equipment; and $47 million for information systems upgrades and technology-related projects. The timing of new, remodeled and relocated store openings along with other factors may affect the relationship between such openings and the related property and equipment purchases in any given period. During 2018, we opened 900 new stores and remodeled or relocated 1,165 stores.

Significant components of property and equipment purchases in 2017 included the following

approximate amounts: $231 million for improvements, upgrades, remodels and relocations of existing stores; $203 million for new leased stores, primarily for leasehold improvements, fixtures and equipment; $176 million for distribution and transportation-related projects; and $30 million for information systems upgrades and technology-related projects. During 2017, we opened 1,315 new stores and remodeled or relocated 764 stores.

Significant components of property and equipment purchases in 2016 included the following

approximate amounts: $201 million for distribution and transportation-related projects; $168 million for improvements, upgrades, remodels and relocations of existing stores; $120 million for new leased stores, primarily for leasehold improvements, fixtures and equipment; $38 million for stores purchased or built by us; and $26 million for information systems upgrades and technology-related projects. During 2016, we opened 900 new stores and remodeled or relocated 906 stores.

Capital expenditures during 2019 are projected to be in the range of $775 million to $825 million. We

anticipate funding 2019 capital requirements with a combination of some or all of the following: existing cash balances, cash flows from operations, availability under our Revolving Facility and/or the issuance of additional senior notes or CP Notes. We plan to continue to invest in store growth and development of approximately 975 new stores and approximately 1,100 stores to be remodeled or relocated. Capital expenditures in 2019 are anticipated to support our store growth as well as our remodel and relocation initiatives, including capital outlays for leasehold improvements, fixtures and equipment; the construction of new stores; costs to support and enhance our supply chain initiatives including new and existing distribution center facilities and our private fleet; technology initiatives; as well as routine and ongoing capital requirements.

Cash flows from financing activities. In 2018, we had net proceeds from the issuance of the 2028 Senior

Notes of $499.5 million, redeemed the 2018 Senior Notes for $400.0 million, and made a principal payment on the Term Facility of $175.0 million. We had a net decrease in consolidated commercial paper borrowings in 2018 of $63.3 million and had no borrowings or repayments under the Revolving Facility. We repurchased 9.9 million outstanding shares of our common stock in 2018 at a total cost of $1.0 billion, and paid cash dividends of $306.5 million.

In 2017, we had net proceeds from the issuance of the 2027 Senior Notes of $599.6 million, redeemed

the 2017 Senior Notes for $500.0 million, and made a principal payment on the Term Facility of $250.0 million. We had a net decrease in consolidated commercial paper borrowings in 2017 of $60.3 million and had no borrowings or repayments under the Revolving Facility. We repurchased 7.1 million outstanding shares of our common stock in 2017 at a total cost of $579.7 million, and paid cash dividends of $282.9 million.

36 2018 Form 10-K

In 2016, we had net commercial paper borrowings of $490.5 million and net repayments under the Revolving Facility of $251.0 million. We repurchased 12.4 million outstanding shares of our common stock at a total cost of $1.0 billion, and paid cash dividends of $281.1 million.

Accounting Standards

In February 2016, the FASB issued new guidance related to lease accounting, which requires a dual

approach for lessee accounting under which a lessee will account for leases as finance leases or operating leases. Both finance leases and operating leases will result in the lessee recognizing a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability on its balance sheet, with differing methodology for income statement recognition. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. In July 2018, the FASB issued additional guidance which allows companies to record the cumulative effect of applying the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the year of adoption, which we will apply. We formed a project team to assess and implement the standard and an executive steering committee to provide oversight. The project team has completed its internal evaluation of existing contractual arrangements for embedded leases, has successfully tested computations in our lease administration system, and has developed a process to compute the rates to discount the lease liabilities as required by the standard. In addition, the project team has identified and implemented new processes and controls to ensure compliance with the new standard, and has evaluated and documented our accounting conclusions related to the new standard. We will utilize transition practical expedients under which we will not be required to reassess (i) whether expired or existing contracts are or contain leases as defined by the new standard, (ii) the classification of such leases, and (iii) whether previously capitalized initial direct costs would qualify for capitalization under the new standard. We have identified our store leases as the area in which we will be most affected by the new guidance, and the most significant impact that adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements is to our consolidated balance sheet. We expect to record consolidated right of use assets and consolidated lease liabilities of approximately $8.0 billion each upon transition to the new guidance.

In January 2017, the FASB issued amendments to existing guidance related to the subsequent

measurement of goodwill. These amendments modify the concept of impairment from the condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value to the condition that exists when the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. Subsequent to adoption, an entity will perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The amendments should be applied on a prospective basis. An entity is required to disclose the nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle upon transition. We currently do not anticipate a material effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows to result from the adoption of this guidance.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in

the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. In addition to the estimates presented below, there are other items within our financial statements that require estimation, but are not deemed critical as defined below. We believe these estimates are reasonable and appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used, the resulting changes could have a material effect on the financial statements taken as a whole.

Management believes the following policies and estimates are critical because they involve significant judgments, assumptions, and estimates. Management has discussed the development and selection of the critical

2018 Form 10-K 37

accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee has reviewed the disclosures presented below relating to those policies and estimates. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for a detailed discussion of our principal accounting policies.

Merchandise Inventories. Merchandise inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market (“LCM”)

with cost determined using the retail last in, first out (“LIFO”) method. We use the retail inventory method (“RIM”) to calculate gross profit and the resulting valuation of inventories at cost, which are computed utilizing a calculated cost-to-retail inventory ratio at an inventory department level. We apply the RIM to these departments, which are groups of products that are fairly uniform in terms of cost, selling price relationship and turnover. The RIM will result in valuing inventories at LCM if permanent markdowns are currently taken as a reduction of the retail value of inventories. Inherent in the retail inventory method calculation are certain management judgments and estimates that may impact the ending inventory valuation at cost, as well as the gross profit recognized. These judgments include ensuring departments consist of similar products, recording estimated shrinkage between physical inventories, and timely recording of markdowns needed to sell inventory.

We perform an annual LIFO analysis whereby all merchandise units are considered for inclusion in the

index formulation. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method is made at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. In contrast, interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s annual estimates of sales, the rate of inflation or deflation, and year-end inventory levels. We also perform analyses for determining obsolete inventory, adjusting inventory on a quarterly basis to an LCM value based on various management assumptions including estimated below cost markdowns not yet recorded, but required to liquidate such inventory in future periods.

Factors considered in the determination of markdowns include current and anticipated demand based on

changes in competitors’ practices, consumer preferences, consumer spending, significant weather events and unseasonable weather patterns. Certain of these factors are outside of our control and may result in greater than estimated markdowns to entice consumer purchases of excess inventory. The amount and timing of markdowns may vary significantly from year to year.

We perform physical inventories in virtually all of our stores on an annual basis. We calculate our shrink provision based on actual physical inventory results during the fiscal period and an accrual for estimated shrink occurring subsequent to a physical inventory through the end of the fiscal reporting period. This accrual is calculated as a percentage of sales at each retail store, at a department level, based on the store’s most recent historical shrink rate. To the extent that subsequent physical inventories yield different results than the estimated accrual, our effective shrink rate for a given reporting period will include the impact of adjusting to the actual results.

We believe our estimates and assumptions related to the application of the RIM results in a merchandise

inventory valuation that reasonably approximates cost on a consistent basis.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The qualitative and quantitative assessments related to the valuation and any potential impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets are each subject to judgments and/or assumptions. The analysis of qualitative factors may include determining the appropriate factors to consider and the relative importance of those factors along with other assumptions. If required, judgments in the quantitative testing process may include projecting future cash flows, determining appropriate discount rates, correctly applying valuation techniques, correctly computing the implied fair value of goodwill if necessary, and other assumptions. Future cash flow projections are based on management’s projections and represent best estimates taking into account recent financial performance, market trends, strategic plans and other available information, which in recent years have been materially accurate. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value or impairment, however, such a conclusion is not indicated by recent analyses. Future indicators of impairment could result in an asset impairment charge. If these judgments or assumptions are incorrect or flawed, the analysis could be negatively impacted.

38 2018 Form 10-K

Our most recent evaluation of our goodwill and indefinite lived trade name intangible assets was completed during the third quarter of 2018. No indicators of impairment were evident and no assessment of or adjustment to these assets was required. We are not currently projecting a decline in cash flows that could be expected to have an adverse effect such as a violation of debt covenants or future impairment charges.

Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are recorded at cost. We group our assets into relatively homogeneous classes and generally provide for depreciation on a straight-line basis over the estimated average useful life of each asset class, except for leasehold improvements, which are amortized over the lesser of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. Certain store and warehouse fixtures, when fully depreciated, are removed from the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization accounts. The valuation and classification of these assets and the assignment of depreciable lives involves judgments and the use of estimates, which we believe have been materially accurate in recent years.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets. Impairment of long-lived assets results when the carrying value of the

assets exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows generated by the assets. Our estimate of undiscounted future store cash flows is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to variability and are difficult to predict. If our estimates of future cash flows are not materially accurate, our impairment analysis could be impacted accordingly. If a long-lived asset is found to be impaired, the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset’s estimated fair value. The fair value is estimated based primarily upon projected future cash flows (discounted at our credit adjusted risk-free rate) or other reasonable estimates of fair market value. Although not currently anticipated, changes in these estimates, assumptions or projections could materially affect the determination of fair value or impairment.

Insurance Liabilities. We retain a significant portion of the risk for our workers’ compensation, employee

health, general liability, property loss, automobile and third-party landlord claim exposures. These represent significant costs primarily due to our large employee base and number of stores. Provisions are made for these liabilities on an undiscounted basis. Certain of these liabilities are based on actual claim data and estimates of incurred but not reported claims developed using actuarial methodologies based on historical claim trends, which have been and are anticipated to continue to be materially accurate. If future claim trends deviate from recent historical patterns, or other unanticipated events affect the number and significance of future claims, we may be required to record additional expenses or expense reductions, which could be material to our future financial results.

Contingent Liabilities – Income Taxes. Income tax reserves are determined using the methodology established by accounting standards relating to uncertainty in income taxes. These standards require companies to assess each income tax position taken using a two-step process. A determination is first made as to whether it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained, based upon the technical merits, upon examination by the taxing authorities. If the tax position is expected to meet the more likely than not criteria, the benefit recorded for the tax position equals the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement of the respective tax position. Uncertain tax positions require determinations and liabilities to be estimated based on provisions of the tax law which may be subject to change or varying interpretation. If our determinations and estimates prove to be inaccurate, the resulting adjustments could be material to our future financial results.

Contingent Liabilities - Legal Matters. We are subject to legal, regulatory and other proceedings and

claims. We establish liabilities as appropriate for these claims and proceedings based upon the probability and estimability of losses and to fairly present, in conjunction with the disclosures of these matters in our financial statements and SEC filings, management’s view of our exposure. We review outstanding claims and proceedings with external counsel, as needed, to assess probability and estimates of loss, which includes an analysis of whether such loss estimates are probable, reasonably possible, or remote. We re-evaluate these assessments on a quarterly basis or as new and significant information becomes available to determine whether a liability should be established or if any existing liability should be adjusted. The actual cost of resolving a claim or proceeding ultimately may be substantially different than the amount of the recorded liability. In addition, because it is not

2018 Form 10-K 39

permissible under U.S. GAAP to establish a litigation liability until the loss is both probable and estimable, in some cases there may be insufficient time to establish a liability prior to the actual incurrence of the loss (upon verdict and judgment at trial, for example, or in the case of a quickly negotiated settlement).

Lease Accounting and Excess Facilities. Many of our stores are subject to build-to-suit arrangements with landlords, which typically carry a primary lease term of up to 15 years with multiple renewal options. We also have stores subject to shorter-term leases and many of these leases have renewal options. Certain of our stores have provisions for contingent rentals based upon a percentage of defined sales volume. We recognize contingent rental expense when the achievement of specified sales targets is considered probable. We record minimum rental expense on a straight-line basis over the base, non-cancelable lease term commencing on the date that we take physical possession of the property from the landlord, which normally includes a period prior to store opening to make necessary leasehold improvements and install store fixtures. When a lease contains a predetermined fixed escalation of the minimum rent, we recognize the related rent expense on a straight-line basis and record the difference between the recognized rental expense and the amounts payable under the lease as deferred rent. Tenant allowances, to the extent received, are recorded as deferred incentive rent and amortized as a reduction to rent expense over the term of the lease. We reflect as a liability any difference between the calculated expense and the amounts actually paid. Improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset.

Share-Based Payments. Our stock option awards are valued on an individual grant basis using the Black- Scholes-Merton closed form option pricing model. We believe that this model fairly estimates the value of our stock option awards. The application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental in the valuation of stock options, which affects compensation expense related to these options. These assumptions include the term that the options are expected to be outstanding, the historical volatility of our stock price, applicable interest rates and the dividend yield of our stock. Other factors involving judgments that affect the expensing of share-based payments include estimated forfeiture rates of share-based awards. Historically, these estimates have been materially accurate; however, if our estimates differ materially from actual experience, we may be required to record additional expense or reductions of expense, which could be material to our future financial results.

Fair Value Measurements. Accounting standards for the measurement of fair value of assets and liabilities establish a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy). Therefore, Level 3 inputs are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity, and thus require the use of significant judgment and estimates. Currently, we have no assets or liabilities that are valued based solely on Level 3 inputs.

Our fair value measurements are primarily associated with our outstanding debt instruments. We use various valuation models in determining the values of these liabilities. We believe that in recent years these methodologies have produced materially accurate valuations.

40 2018 Form 10-K

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Financial Risk Management

We are exposed to market risk primarily from adverse changes in interest rates, and to a lesser degree commodity prices. To minimize this risk, we may periodically use financial instruments, including derivatives. All derivative financial instrument transactions must be authorized and executed pursuant to approval by the Board of Directors. As a matter of policy, we do not buy or sell financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes, and any such derivative financial instruments are intended to be used to reduce risk by hedging an underlying economic exposure. Our objective is to correlate derivative financial instruments and the underlying exposure being hedged, so that fluctuations in the value of the financial instruments are generally offset by reciprocal changes in the value of the underlying economic exposure.

Interest Rate Risk

We manage our interest rate risk through the strategic use of fixed and variable interest rate debt and,

from time to time, derivative financial instruments. Our principal interest rate exposure relates to outstanding amounts under our unsecured revolving credit facility as well as our commercial paper program. As of February 1, 2019, we had consolidated borrowings of $366.9 million under our commercial paper program and no borrowings outstanding under our Revolving Facility. In order to mitigate a portion of the variable rate interest exposure under the credit facilities, in prior years we have entered into various interest rate swaps. As of February 1, 2019, no such interest rate swaps were outstanding and, as a result, we are exposed to fluctuations in variable interest rates under the Revolving Facility and our commercial paper program. For a detailed discussion of our Revolving Facility and our commercial paper program, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.

A change in interest rates on variable rate debt impacts our pre-tax earnings and cash flows; whereas a

change in interest rates on fixed rate debt impacts the economic fair value of debt but not our pre-tax earnings and cash flows. Based on our variable rate borrowing levels as of February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018, the annualized effect of a one percentage point increase in variable interest rates would have resulted in a pretax reduction of our earnings and cash flows of approximately $3.7 million in 2018 and $6.1 million in 2017.

2018 Form 10-K 41

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Dollar General Corporation Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dollar General Corporation and

subsidiaries (the Company) as of February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 1, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 1, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight

Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated March 22, 2019, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our

responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that

we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2001. Nashville, Tennessee March 22, 2019

42 2018 Form 10-K

DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

February 1, February 2, 2019 2018

ASSETS Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 235,487 $ 267,441 Merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,097,004 3,609,025 Income taxes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57,804 108,265 Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272,725 263,121 Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,663,020 4,247,852

Net property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,970,806 2,701,282 Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,338,589 4,338,589 Other intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,200,217 1,200,428 Other assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,406 28,760 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,204,038 $ 12,516,911 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current liabilities:

Current portion of long-term obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,950 $ 401,345 Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,385,469 2,009,771 Accrued expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 618,405 549,658 Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,033 4,104 Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,015,857 2,964,878

Long-term obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,862,740 2,604,613 Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 609,687 515,702 Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298,361 305,944 Commitments and contingencies Shareholders’ equity:

Preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — Common stock; $0.875 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 259,511 and

268,733 shares issued and outstanding at February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227,072 235,141

Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,252,421 3,196,462 Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,941,107 2,698,352 Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3,207) (4,181) Total shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,417,393 6,125,774

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,204,038 $ 12,516,911

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

2018 Form 10-K 43

DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

For the Year Ended February 1, February 2, February 3,

2019 2018 2017 Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25,625,043 $ 23,470,967 $ 21,986,598 Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,821,173 16,249,608 15,203,960 Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,803,870 7,221,359 6,782,638 Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,687,564 5,213,541 4,719,189 Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,116,306 2,007,818 2,063,449 Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99,871 97,036 97,821 Other (income) expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,019 3,502 — Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,015,416 1,907,280 1,965,628 Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425,944 368,320 714,495 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,589,472 $ 1,538,960 $ 1,251,133 Earnings per share:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5.99 $ 5.64 $ 4.45 Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5.97 $ 5.63 $ 4.43

Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265,155 272,751 281,317 Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266,105 273,362 282,261

Dividends per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.16 $ 1.04 $ 1.00

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

44 2018 Form 10-K

DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)

For the Year Ended February 1, February 2, February 3, 2019 2018 2017

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,589,472 $ 1,538,960 $ 1,251,133 Unrealized net gain (loss) on hedged transactions, net of related

income tax expense (benefit) of $344, $509 and $527, respectively . . 974 809 817 Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,590,446 $ 1,539,769 $ 1,251,950

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

2018 Form 10-K 45

DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands except per share amounts)

Accumulated Common Additional Other Stock Common Paid-in Retained Comprehensive Shares Stock Capital Earnings Loss Total Balances, January 29, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286,694 $ 250,855 $ 3,107,283 $ 2,025,545 $ (5,807) $ 5,377,876 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — 1,251,133 — 1,251,133 Dividends paid, $1.00 per common share . . . . . . . . . — — — (281,147) — (281,147) Unrealized net gain (loss) on hedged transactions . . . — — — — 817 817 Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — 36,967 — — 36,967 Repurchases of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (12,354) (10,810) — (979,664) — (990,474) Other equity and related transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 766 10,356 — — 11,122 Balances, February 3, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275,212 $ 240,811 $ 3,154,606 $ 2,015,867 $ (4,990) $ 5,406,294 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — 1,538,960 — 1,538,960 Dividends paid, $1.04 per common share . . . . . . . . . — — — (282,941) — (282,941) Unrealized net gain (loss) on hedged transactions . . . — — — — 809 809 Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — 34,323 — — 34,323 Repurchases of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7,060) (6,178) — (573,534) — (579,712) Other equity and related transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . 581 508 7,533 — — 8,041 Balances, February 2, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268,733 $ 235,141 $ 3,196,462 $ 2,698,352 $ (4,181) $ 6,125,774 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — 1,589,472 — 1,589,472 Dividends paid, $1.16 per common share . . . . . . . . . — — — (306,562) — (306,562) Unrealized net gain (loss) on hedged transactions . . . — — — — 974 974 Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — 40,879 — — 40,879 Repurchases of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (9,891) (8,655) — (998,839) — (1,007,494) Transition adjustment upon adoption of accounting

standard (see Note 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — (41,316) — (41,316) Other equity and related transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . 669 586 15,080 — — 15,666 Balances, February 1, 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259,511 $ 227,072 $ 3,252,421 $ 2,941,107 $ (3,207) $ 6,417,393

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

46 2018 Form 10-K

DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

For the Year Ended

February 1, February 2, February 3, 2019 2018 2017

Cash flows from operating activities: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,589,472 $ 1,538,960 $ 1,251,133 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating

activities: Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454,134 404,231 379,931 Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,325 (137,648) 12,359 Loss on debt retirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,019 3,502 — Noncash share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,879 34,323 36,967 Other noncash (gains) and losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41,851 11,088 (3,625) Change in operating assets and liabilities:

Merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (521,342) (348,363) (171,908) Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (12,097) (49,406) (25,046) Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375,214 427,911 56,477 Accrued expenses and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,857 75,647 42,937 Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,390 (156,504) 26,316 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (152) (1,633) (500)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,143,550 1,802,108 1,605,041 Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (734,380) (646,456) (560,296) Proceeds from sales of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,777 1,428 9,360 Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . (731,603) (645,028) (550,936) Cash flows from financing activities: Issuance of long-term obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 499,495 599,556 — Repayments of long-term obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (577,321) (752,676) (3,138) Net increase (decrease) in commercial paper outstanding . . . . . . . (63,300) (60,300) 490,500 Borrowings under revolving credit facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — 1,584,000 Repayments of borrowings under revolving credit facilities . . . . . — — (1,835,000) Costs associated with issuance and retirement of debt . . . . . . . . . . (4,384) (9,524) — Repurchases of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,007,494) (579,712) (990,474) Payments of cash dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (306,523) (282,931) (281,135) Other equity and related transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,626 8,033 11,110 Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,443,901) (1,077,554) (1,024,137) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . (31,954) 79,526 29,968 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267,441 187,915 157,947 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 235,487 $ 267,441 $ 187,915 Supplemental cash flow information: Cash paid for:

Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 98,012 $ 88,749 $ 92,952 Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 313,457 $ 660,510 $ 679,633

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: Purchases of property and equipment awaiting processing for

payment, included in Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 63,662 $ 63,178 $ 38,914

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

2018 Form 10-K 47

DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Basis of presentation and accounting policies Basis of presentation

These notes contain references to the years 2018, 2017, and 2016, which represent fiscal years ended February 1, 2019, February 2, 2018, and February 3, 2017, respectively. The Company’s 2018 and 2017 accounting periods were comprised of 52-weeks, while 2016 was a 53-week accounting period. The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Friday closest to January 31. The consolidated financial statements include all subsidiaries of the Company, except for its not-for-profit subsidiary which the Company does not control. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

The Company sells general merchandise on a retail basis through 15,370 stores (as of February 1, 2019)

in 44 states with the greatest concentration of stores in the southern, southwestern, midwestern and eastern United States. The Company owns distribution centers for non-refrigerated merchandise (“DCs”) in Scottsville, Kentucky; South Boston, Virginia; Alachua, Florida; Zanesville, Ohio; Jonesville, South Carolina; Marion, Indiana; Bessemer, Alabama; Bethel, Pennsylvania; San Antonio, Texas; Janesville, Wisconsin; Jackson, Georgia, and Longview, Texas, and leases DCs in Ardmore, Oklahoma; Fulton, Missouri; Indianola, Mississippi; and Lebec, California. The Company also owns a cold storage and distribution facility in Pottsville, Pennsylvania. Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with insignificant interest rate risk and original maturities of three months or less when purchased. Such investments primarily consist of money market funds, bank deposits, certificates of deposit, and commercial paper. The carrying amounts of these items are a reasonable estimate of their fair value due to the short maturity of these investments.

Payments due from processors for electronic tender transactions classified as cash and cash equivalents

totaled approximately $99.5 million and $90.4 million at February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018, respectively.

Investments in debt and equity securities

The Company accounts for investments in debt and marketable equity securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading, depending on their classification. Debt securities categorized as held-to-maturity are stated at amortized cost. Debt and equity securities categorized as available-for-sale are stated at fair value, with any unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred income taxes, reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss. Trading securities are stated at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded as a component of Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense. The cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method. Merchandise inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market (“LCM”) with cost determined using the retail last- in, first-out (“LIFO”) method as this method results in a better matching of costs and revenues. Under the Company’s retail inventory method (“RIM”), the calculation of gross profit and the resulting valuation of inventories at cost are computed by applying a calculated cost-to-retail inventory ratio to the retail value of sales at a department level. The use of the RIM will result in valuing inventories at LCM if markdowns are currently taken as a reduction of the retail value of inventories. Costs directly associated with warehousing and distribution are capitalized into inventory.

48 2018 Form 10-K

The excess of current cost over LIFO cost was approximately $103.7 million and $78.5 million at February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018, respectively. Current cost is determined using the RIM on a first-in, first- out basis. Under the LIFO inventory method, the impacts of rising or falling market price changes increase or decrease cost of sales (the LIFO provision or benefit). The Company recorded a LIFO provision (benefit) of $25.2 million in 2018, $(2.2) million in 2017, and $(12.2) million in 2016, which is included in cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of income.

The Company purchases its merchandise from a wide variety of suppliers. The Company’s three largest

suppliers each accounted for approximately 8% of the Company’s purchases in 2018.

Vendor rebates The Company accounts for all cash consideration received from vendors in accordance with applicable

accounting standards pertaining to such arrangements. Cash consideration received from a vendor is generally presumed to be a rebate or an allowance and is accounted for as a reduction of merchandise purchase costs as earned. However, certain specific, incremental and otherwise qualifying SG&A expenses related to the promotion or sale of vendor products may be offset by cash consideration received from vendors, in accordance with arrangements such as cooperative advertising, when earned for dollar amounts up to but not exceeding actual incremental costs.

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets include prepaid amounts for rent, maintenance, business

licenses, advertising, and insurance, and amounts receivable for certain vendor rebates (primarily those expected to be collected in cash) and coupons.

Property and equipment

In 2007, the Company’s property and equipment was recorded at estimated fair values as the result of a

merger transaction. Property and equipment acquired subsequent to the merger has been recorded at cost. The Company records depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the assets’ estimated useful lives. The Company’s property and equipment balances and depreciable lives are summarized as follows:

Depreciable February 1, February 2, (In thousands) Life 2019 2018

Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Indefinite $ 214,632 $ 212,033 Land improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 85,093 79,597 Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 - 40 1,219,852 1,116,872 Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (a) 583,531 507,894 Furniture, fixtures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 10 3,298,594 3,186,406 Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117,275 72,490 5,518,977 5,175,292 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization . . 2,548,171 2,474,010 Net property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,970,806 $ 2,701,282

(a) Amortized over the lesser of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset.

Depreciation expense related to property and equipment was approximately $454.1 million, $403.3 million and $378.3 million for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Amortization of capital lease assets is included in depreciation expense. Interest on borrowed funds during the construction of property and equipment is capitalized where applicable. Interest costs of $3.7 million, $2.0 million, and $1.4 million were capitalized in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

2018 Form 10-K 49

Impairment of long-lived assets

When indicators of impairment are present, the Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets, excluding goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, in relation to the operating performance and future cash flows or the appraised values of the underlying assets. Generally, the Company’s policy is to review for impairment stores open more than three years for which current cash flows from operations are negative. Impairment results when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. The Company’s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to variability and difficult to predict. If a long-lived asset is found to be impaired, the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset’s estimated fair value. The fair value is estimated based primarily upon estimated future cash flows over the asset’s remaining useful life (discounted at the Company’s credit adjusted risk-free rate) or other reasonable estimates of fair market value. Assets to be disposed of are adjusted to the fair value less the cost to sell if less than the book value.

The Company recorded impairment charges included in SG&A expense of approximately $4.1 million in

2018, $7.8 million in 2017 and $6.3 million in 2016, to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores’ assets. Such action was deemed necessary based on the Company’s evaluation that such amounts would not be recoverable primarily due to insufficient sales or excessive costs resulting in the carrying value of the assets exceeding the estimated undiscounted future cash flows generated by the assets at these locations. Goodwill and other intangible assets

If not deemed indefinite, the Company amortizes intangible assets over their estimated useful lives.

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if indicators of impairment are present. Definite lived intangible assets are tested for impairment if indicators of impairment are present. Impaired assets are written down to fair value as required. No impairment of intangible assets has been identified during any of the periods presented.

In accordance with accounting standards for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, an entity has

the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether events and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that goodwill or an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If after such assessment an entity concludes that the asset is not impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the asset using a quantitative impairment test, and if impaired, the associated assets must be written down to fair value as described in further detail below.

The quantitative goodwill impairment test is a two-step process that would require management to make

judgments in determining what assumptions to use in the calculation. The first step of the process consists of estimating the fair value of an entity’s reporting units based on valuation techniques (including a discounted cash flow model using revenue and profit forecasts) and comparing that estimated fair value with the recorded carrying value, which includes goodwill. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment by determining an “implied fair value” of goodwill. The determination of the implied fair value of goodwill would require the entity to allocate the estimated fair value of its reporting unit to its assets and liabilities. Any unallocated fair value would represent the implied fair value of goodwill, which would be compared to its corresponding carrying value.

The quantitative impairment test for intangible assets compares the fair value of the intangible asset with

its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

The Company’s goodwill balance has an indefinite life and is not expected to be deductible for tax

purposes. Substantially all of the Company’s other intangible assets are trade names and trademarks which have an indefinite life.

50 2018 Form 10-K

Other assets

Noncurrent Other assets consist primarily of qualifying prepaid expenses for maintenance, beer and wine licenses, and utility, security and other deposits. Accrued expenses and other liabilities

Accrued expenses and other consist of the following:

February 1, February 2, (In thousands) 2019 2018

Compensation and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 121,375 $ 118,755 Self-insurance reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107,380 96,277 Taxes (other than taxes on income) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183,941 164,451 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205,709 170,175 $ 618,405 $ 549,658

Included in other accrued expenses are liabilities for freight expense, interest, utilities, and maintenance.

Insurance liabilities

The Company retains a significant portion of risk for its workers’ compensation, employee health, general liability, property, automobile, and third-party landlord liability claim exposures. Accordingly, provisions are made for the Company’s estimates of such risks. The undiscounted future claim costs for the workers’ compensation, general liability, landlord liability, and health claim risks are derived using actuarial methods and are recorded as self-insurance reserves pursuant to Company policy. To the extent that subsequent claim costs vary from those estimates, future results of operations will be affected as the reserves are adjusted.

Ashley River Insurance Company (“ARIC”), a Tennessee-based wholly owned captive insurance

subsidiary of the Company, charges the operating subsidiary companies premiums to insure the retained workers’ compensation, medical stop-loss, and non-property general liability exposures. Pursuant to Tennessee insurance regulations, ARIC maintains certain levels of cash and cash equivalents related to its self-insured exposures. Operating leases and related liabilities

Rent expense is recognized over the term of the lease. The Company records minimum rental expense on a straight-line basis over the base, non-cancelable lease term commencing on the date that the Company takes physical possession of the property from the landlord, which normally includes a period prior to the store opening to make leasehold improvements if necessary and install store fixtures. When a lease contains a predetermined fixed escalation of the minimum rent, the Company recognizes the related rent expense on a straight-line basis and records the difference between the recognized rental expense and the amounts payable under the lease as deferred rent. Tenant allowances, to the extent received, are recorded as deferred incentive rent and are amortized as a reduction to rent expense over the term of the lease. The difference between the calculated expense and the amounts paid result in a liability classified in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets, and totaled approximately $70.1 million and $65.9 million at February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018, respectively.

The Company recognizes contingent rental expense when the achievement of specified sales targets is

considered probable. The amount expensed but not paid as of February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018 was approximately $2.4 million and $2.7 million, respectively, and is included in Accrued expenses and other in the consolidated balance sheets.

2018 Form 10-K 51

Other liabilities

Noncurrent Other liabilities consist of the following:

February 1, February 2, (In thousands) 2019 2018

Self-insurance reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 130,022 $ 134,256 Deferred rent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70,139 65,856 Deferred gain on sale leaseback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,303 44,781 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57,897 61,051 $ 298,361 $ 305,944

Fair value accounting

The Company utilizes accounting standards for fair value, which include the definition of fair value, the

framework for measuring fair value, and disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, fair value accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that

the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, observable market activity. In instances where the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Other comprehensive income

The Company previously recorded a loss on the settlement of treasury locks associated with the issuance

of long-term debt in 2013 which was deferred to other comprehensive income and is being amortized as an increase to interest expense over the 10-year period of the debt’s maturity.

Revenue and gain recognition

The Company recognizes retail sales in its stores at the time the customer takes possession of

merchandise. All sales are net of discounts and are presented net of taxes assessed by governmental authorities that are imposed concurrent with those sales. The Company records gain contingencies when realized.

The Company recognizes gift card sales revenue at the time of redemption. The liability for gift cards is

established for the cash value at the time of purchase of the gift card. The liability for outstanding gift cards was approximately $5.2 million and $4.2 million at February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018, respectively, and is recorded in Accrued expenses and other liabilities. Estimated breakage revenue, a percentage of gift cards that will never be redeemed based on historical redemption rates, is recognized over time in proportion to actual gift card

52 2018 Form 10-K

redemptions. The Company recorded breakage revenue of $0.8 million, $0.6 million and $0.5 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Advertising costs

Advertising costs are expensed upon performance, “first showing” or distribution, and are reflected in

SG&A expenses net of earned cooperative advertising amounts provided by vendors which are specific, incremental and otherwise qualifying expenses related to the promotion or sale of vendor products for dollar amounts up to but not exceeding actual incremental costs. Advertising costs were $70.5 million, $68.8 million and $82.7 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These costs primarily include promotional circulars, targeted circulars supporting new stores, television and radio advertising, in-store signage, and costs associated with the sponsorships of certain automobile racing activities in 2016. Vendor funding for cooperative advertising offset reported expenses by $35.0 million, $33.8 million and $35.9 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Share-based payments

The Company recognizes compensation expense for share-based compensation based on the fair value of

the awards on the grant date. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of valuation and reduce expense ratably over the vesting period. This estimate may be adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the prior estimate. The forfeiture rate is the estimated percentage of share-based awards granted that are expected to be forfeited or canceled before becoming fully vested. The Company bases this estimate on historical experience or estimates of future trends, as applicable. An increase in the forfeiture rate will decrease compensation expense.

The fair value of each option grant is separately estimated and amortized into compensation expense on a

straight-line basis between the applicable grant date and each vesting date. The Company has estimated the fair value of all stock option awards as of the grant date by applying the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing valuation model. The application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and highly sensitive in the determination of compensation expense.

The Company calculates compensation expense for restricted stock, share units and similar awards as the

difference between the market price of the underlying stock or similar award on the grant date and the purchase price, if any. Such expense is recognized on a straight-line basis for time-based awards and generally on an accelerated basis for performance awards over the period in which the recipient earns the awards.

Store pre-opening costs

Pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the related construction periods are expensed as

incurred.

Income taxes Under the accounting standards for income taxes, the asset and liability method is used for computing the

future income tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements or income tax returns. Deferred income tax expense or benefit is the net change during the year in the Company’s deferred income tax assets and liabilities.

The Company includes income tax related interest and penalties as a component of the provision for

income tax expense. Income tax reserves are determined using a methodology which requires companies to assess each

income tax position taken using a two-step process. A determination is first made as to whether it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained, based upon the technical merits, upon examination by the taxing

2018 Form 10-K 53

authorities. If the tax position is expected to meet the more likely than not criteria, the benefit recorded for the tax position equals the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement of the respective tax position. Uncertain tax positions require determinations and estimated liabilities to be made based on provisions of the tax law which may be subject to change or varying interpretation. If the Company’s determinations and estimates prove to be inaccurate, the resulting adjustments could be material to the Company’s future financial results.

Management estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles

generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Accounting standards In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued comprehensive new

accounting standards related to the recognition of revenue and in August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted this guidance using the modified retrospective approach effective February 3, 2018, and such adoption had no effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In February 2016, the FASB issued new guidance related to lease accounting, which requires a dual

approach for lessee accounting under which a lessee will account for leases as finance leases or operating leases. Both finance leases and operating leases will result in the lessee recognizing a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability on its balance sheet, with differing methodology for income statement recognition. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. In July 2018, the FASB issued additional guidance which allows companies to record the cumulative effect of applying the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the year of adoption, which the Company intends to apply. The Company will adopt the new standard effective February 2, 2019. The Company formed a project team to assess and implement the standard and an executive steering committee to provide oversight. The project team has completed its internal evaluation of existing contractual arrangements for embedded leases, has successfully tested computations in the Company’s lease administration system, and has developed a process to compute the rates to discount the lease liabilities as required by the standard. In addition, the project team has identified and implemented new processes and controls to ensure compliance with the new standard, and has evaluated and documented the Company’s accounting conclusions related to the new standard. The Company will utilize transition practical expedients under which the Company will not be required to reassess (i) whether expired or existing contracts are or contain leases as defined by the new standard, (ii) the classification of such leases, and (iii) whether previously capitalized initial direct costs would qualify for capitalization under the new standard. The Company has identified its store leases as the area in which it will be most affected by the new guidance, and the most significant impact that adoption will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements is to its consolidated balance sheet. The Company expects to record consolidated right of use assets and consolidated lease liabilities of approximately $8.0 billion each upon transition to the new guidance.

In October 2016, the FASB issued amendments to existing guidance related to accounting for intra-entity

transfers of assets other than inventory, which affects the Company’s historical accounting for intra-entity transfers of certain intangible assets. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments are applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company adopted this guidance effective February 3, 2018 which resulted in an increase in deferred income tax liabilities and a decrease in retained earnings of $41.3 million.

54 2018 Form 10-K

In January 2017, the FASB issued amendments to existing guidance related to the subsequent measurement of goodwill. These amendments modify the concept of impairment from the condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value to the condition that exists when the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. Subsequent to adoption, an entity will perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The amendments should be applied on a prospective basis. An entity is required to disclose the nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle upon transition. The Company currently does not anticipate a material effect on its consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows to result from the adoption of this guidance. Reclassifications

Certain financial disclosures relating to prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation where applicable. 2. Earnings per share

Earnings per share is computed as follows (in thousands except per share data):

2018 Weighted Net Average Per Share Income Shares Amount

Basic earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,589,472 265,155 $ 5.99 Effect of dilutive share-based awards . . . . . . . . . . 950 Diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,589,472 266,105 $ 5.97

2017 Weighted Net Average Per Share Income Shares Amount

Basic earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,538,960 272,751 $ 5.64 Effect of dilutive share-based awards . . . . . . . . . . 611 Diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,538,960 273,362 $ 5.63

2016 Weighted Net Average Per Share Income Shares Amount

Basic earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,251,133 281,317 $ 4.45 Effect of dilutive share-based awards . . . . . . . . . . 944 Diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,251,133 282,261 $ 4.43

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares

of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share is determined based on the dilutive effect of share-based awards using the treasury stock method.

2018 Form 10-K 55

Share-based awards that were outstanding at the end of the respective periods, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect of exercising such options would be antidilutive, were 0.8 million, 2.1 million and 1.7 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. 3. Income taxes

The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following:

(In thousands) 2018 2017 2016

Current: Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 320,361 $ 426,933 $ 613,009 Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 105 135 State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53,091 79,011 88,990

373,611 506,049 702,134 Deferred:

Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,262 (159,728) 11,053 Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (38) (22) — State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,109 22,021 1,308

52,333 (137,729) 12,361 $ 425,944 $ 368,320 $ 714,495

A reconciliation between actual income taxes and amounts computed by applying the federal statutory

rate to income before income taxes is summarized as follows:

(Dollars in thousands) 2018 2017 2016

U.S. federal statutory rate on earnings before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 423,237 21.0 % $ 643,326 33.7 % $ 687,969 35.0 %

Impact of tax rate changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (12,222) (0.6) (310,756) (16.3) — — State income taxes, net of federal income

tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,584 2.2 61,201 3.2 60,168 3.1 Jobs credits, net of federal income taxes . . . . (27,506) (1.4) (26,759) (1.4) (18,952) (1.0) Increase (decrease) in valuation allowances,

net of federal taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — 4,435 0.2 (1,474) (0.1) Stock-based compensation programs . . . . . . . (3,682) (0.2) (2,227) (0.1) (9,915) (0.5) Increase (decrease) in income tax reserves . . 3,952 0.2 (1,837) (0.1) (2,161) (0.1) Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2,419) (0.1) 937 0.1 (1,140) (0.1) $ 425,944 21.1 % $ 368,320 19.3 % $ 714,495 36.3 %

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was signed into law. Among other changes, the Act reduces the federal corporate tax rate to 21% from 35% effective January 1, 2018, including a reduction in the Company’s current year federal corporate tax rate for 2017 to 33.7% as a result of the Company’s 2017 fiscal year ending approximately one month after the effective date of the Act.

Under accounting standards for income taxes, the impact of new tax legislation must be taken into

account in the period in which the new legislation is enacted, including the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities at the tax rates that such items are expected to reverse in future periods. Subsequent to the Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”), allowing companies to record provisional amounts during a measurement period not to exceed one year after the enactment date while the accounting impact remains under analysis. The Company’s 2017 provision for income taxes reflected such estimates due to the changes in income tax law, including a provisional tax benefit of $335 million. The provisional tax benefit consisted of $310.8 million related to the one-time remeasurement of the federal portion of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities at the 21% rate and $24.2 million related to the reduced statutory tax rate of 33.7%, compared to 35% in prior years. The Company concluded its analysis of the

56 2018 Form 10-K

accounting impact of the Act pursuant to SAB 118 and recorded immaterial adjustments related to its 2017 provision for income taxes in 2018.

The effective income tax rate for 2018 was 21.1% compared to a rate of 19.3% for 2017 which represents

a net increase of 1.8 percentage points. The effective income tax rate was higher in 2018 primarily due to the one- time remeasurement of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at 21% in 2017, which was offset by the reduction in the current federal tax rate from 33.7% in 2017 to 21% in 2018.

The effective income tax rate for 2017 was 19.3% compared to a rate of 36.3% for 2016 which represents

a net decrease of 17 percentage points. The effective income tax rate was lower in 2017 primarily due to the one- time remeasurement of the federal portion of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities at 21%, and the changes in the federal income tax laws pursuant to the Act that lowered the Company’s federal statutory tax rate to 33.7% for 2017, compared to 35% in 2016.

The 2016 effective tax rate was an expense of 36.3%. This expense was greater than the federal statutory

tax rate of 35% due primarily to the inclusion of state income taxes in the total effective tax rate. The effective income tax rate was lower in 2016 as compared to 2015 due principally to the adoption of a change in accounting guidance related to employee share-based payments, requiring the recognition of excess tax benefits in the statement of income rather than in the balance sheet, as reported in prior years.

Deferred taxes reflect the effects of temporary differences between carrying amounts of assets and

liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

February 1, February 2, (In thousands) 2019 2018

Deferred tax assets: Deferred compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,490 $ 6,522 Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,278 3,324 Accrued rent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,668 23,418 Accrued insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,869 8,630 Accrued incentive compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,219 6,394 Share based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,713 13,442 Interest rate hedges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,421 1,765 Tax benefit of income tax and interest reserves related to uncertain tax positions . 472 365 Deferred gain on sale-leaseback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,649 12,847 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,942 3,900 State tax net operating loss carry forwards, net of federal tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 598 602 State tax credit carry forwards, net of federal tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,245 8,350

96,564 89,559 Less valuation allowances, net of federal income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4,433) (4,435) Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92,131 85,124 Deferred tax liabilities:

Property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (322,575) (255,215) Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (56,221) (46,244) Trademarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (308,793) (269,820) Prepaid insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (12,639) (22,875) Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,590) (6,672)

Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (701,818) (600,826) Net deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (609,687) $ (515,702)

2018 Form 10-K 57

The Company has state tax credit carryforwards of approximately $8.2 million that will expire beginning in 2022 through 2028 and the Company has approximately $17.2 million of state apportioned net operating loss carryforwards, which will begin to expire in 2033 and will continue through 2039.

The Company established a valuation allowance for the state tax credit carryforwards, in the amount of

$4.4 million (net of federal benefit) increasing income tax expense in 2017. In 2018, management continues to believe that results from operations will not generate sufficient taxable income to realize certain state tax credits before they expire. In 2016, the Company reversed all of the previously recorded valuation allowance for state tax credit carryforwards in the amount of $1.5 million, which was recorded as a reduction in income tax expense.

Based upon expected future income, management believes that it is more likely than not that the results

of operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the remaining deferred tax assets. The Company’s 2014 and earlier tax years are not open for further examination by the Internal Revenue

Service (“IRS”). The IRS, at its discretion, may choose to examine the Company’s 2015 through 2017 fiscal year income tax filings. The Company has various state income tax examinations that are currently in progress. Generally, with few exceptions, the Company’s 2015 and later tax years remain open for examination by the various state taxing authorities.

As of February 1, 2019, accruals for uncertain tax benefits, interest expense related to income taxes and

potential income tax penalties were $5.0 million, $0.8 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for a total of $6.7 million. This total amount is reflected in noncurrent Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

As of February 2, 2018, accruals for uncertain tax benefits, interest expense related to income taxes and

potential income tax penalties were $1.0 million, $0.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for a total of $2.5 million. This total amount is reflected in noncurrent Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

The Company’s reserve for uncertain tax positions will not be reduced in the coming twelve months as a

result of expiring statutes of limitations. As of February 1, 2019, approximately $5.0 million of the uncertain tax positions would impact the Company’s effective income tax rate if the Company were to recognize the tax benefit for these positions.

The amounts associated with uncertain tax positions included in income tax expense consists of the

following:

(In thousands) 2018 2017 2016

Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,919 $ (2,076) $ (3,795) Income tax related interest expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . 133 (123) (31) Income tax related penalty expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . 33 (9) 50

A reconciliation of the uncertain income tax positions from January 29, 2016 through February 1, 2019 is

as follows:

(In thousands) 2018 2017 2016

Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,041 $ 3,117 $ 6,964 Increases—tax positions taken in the current year . . . . 95 66 41 Increases—tax positions taken in prior years . . . . . . . . 3,914 27 52 Decreases—tax positions taken in prior years . . . . . . . — — (1,435) Statute expirations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (2,169) (2,453) Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (90) — (52) Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,960 $ 1,041 $ 3,117

58 2018 Form 10-K

4. Current and long-term obligations

Consolidated current and long-term obligations consist of the following:

February 1, February 2, (In thousands) 2019 2018

Senior unsecured credit facilities Term Facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ 175,000 Revolving Facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — —

1.875% Senior Notes due April 15, 2018 (net of discount of $16) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 399,984 3.250% Senior Notes due April 15, 2023 (net of discount of $1,084 and $1,322) . . 898,916 898,678 4.150% Senior Notes due November 1, 2025 (net of discount of $562 and $632) . . 499,438 499,368 3.875% Senior Notes due April 15, 2027 (net of discount of $375 and $413) . . . . . 599,625 599,587 4.125% Senior Notes due May 1, 2028 (net of discount of $471) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 499,529 — Unsecured commercial paper notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366,900 430,200 Capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,977 12,321 Tax increment financing due February 1, 2035 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,360 7,335 Debt issuance costs, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (17,055) (16,515) 2,864,690 3,005,958 Less: current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,950) (401,345) Long-term portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,862,740 $ 2,604,613

At February 1, 2019, the Company’s maintained a $1.25 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Facility”) that provides for the issuance of letters of credit up to $175.0 million and is scheduled to mature on February 22, 2022.

Borrowings under the Revolving Facility bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable interest rate margin

plus, at the Company’s option, either (a) LIBOR or (b) a base rate (which is usually equal to the prime rate). The applicable interest rate margin for borrowings as of February 1, 2019 was 1.10% for LIBOR borrowings and 0.10% for base-rate borrowings. The Company is also required to pay a facility fee, payable on any used and unused commitment amounts of the Revolving Facility, and customary fees on letters of credit issued under the Revolving Facility. As of February 1, 2019, the commitment fee rate was 0.15%. The applicable interest rate margins for borrowings, the facility fees and the letter of credit fees under the Revolving Facility are subject to adjustment from time to time based on the Company’s long-term senior unsecured debt ratings.

The Revolving Facility contains a number of customary affirmative and negative covenants that, among

other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the Company’s ability to: incur additional liens; sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; consummate certain fundamental changes or change in the Company’s lines of business; and incur additional subsidiary indebtedness. The Revolving Facility also contains financial covenants which require the maintenance of a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. As of February 1, 2019, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. The Revolving Facility also contains customary events of default.

On June 11, 2018, the Company voluntarily prepaid the entire $175.0 million outstanding balance of its

senior unsecured term loan facility and recognized an associated loss of $1.0 million which is reflected in Other (income) expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended February 1, 2019. As of February 1, 2019, the Company had no outstanding borrowings, outstanding letters of credit of $7.6 million, and borrowing availability of $1.2 billion under the Revolving Facility that, due to its intention to maintain borrowing availability related to the commercial paper program described below, could contribute incremental liquidity of $689.5 million. In addition, the Company had outstanding letters of credit of $32.9 million which were issued pursuant to separate agreements.

As of February 1, 2019, the Company had a commercial paper program under which the Company may

2018 Form 10-K 59

issue unsecured commercial paper notes (the “CP Notes”) from time to time in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1.0 billion outstanding at any time. The CP Notes have maturities of up to 364 days from the date of issue and rank equal in right of payment with all of the Company’s other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. The Company intends to maintain available commitments under the Revolving Facility in an amount at least equal to the amount of CP Notes outstanding at any time. As of February 1, 2019, the Company’s consolidated balance sheet reflected outstanding CP notes of $366.9 million, which were classified as long-term obligations due to the Company’s intent and ability to refinance these obligations as long-term debt. An additional $186.0 million of outstanding CP Notes were held by a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and are therefore not reflected on the consolidated balance sheet. As of February 1, 2019, the outstanding CP Notes had a weighted average borrowing rate of 2.7%.

On April 10, 2018, the Company issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.125% senior

notes due 2028 (the “2028 Senior Notes”), net of discount of $0.5 million, which are scheduled to mature on May 1, 2028. Interest on the 2028 Senior Notes is payable in cash on May 1 and November 1 of each year, and the first interest payment commenced on November 1, 2018. The Company incurred $4.4 million of debt issuance costs associated with the issuance of the 2028 Senior Notes.

Effective April 15, 2018, the Company redeemed $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of

outstanding 1.875% senior notes due 2018 (the “2018 Senior Notes”). There was no gain or loss associated with the redemption. The Company funded the redemption price for the 2018 Senior Notes with proceeds from the issuance of the 2028 Senior Notes.

On April 11, 2017, the Company issued $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.875% senior

notes due 2027 (the “2027 Senior Notes”), at a discount of $0.4 million, which are scheduled to mature on April 15, 2027. Interest on the 2027 Senior Notes is payable in cash on April 15 and October 15 of each year, and commenced on October 15, 2017. The Company incurred $5.2 million of debt issuance costs associated with the issuance of the 2027 Senior Notes.

On April 27, 2017, the Company redeemed $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding

4.125% senior notes due 2017 (the “2017 Senior Notes”), resulting in a pretax loss of $3.4 million which is reflected in Other (income) expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended February 2, 2018.

Collectively, the 2028 Senior Notes, the 2027 Senior Notes and the Company’s other Senior Notes due

2023 and 2025 as reflected in the table above comprise the “Senior Notes”, each of which were issued pursuant to an indenture as supplemented and amended by supplemental indentures relating to each series of Senior Notes (as so supplemented and amended, the “Senior Indenture”). The Company may redeem some or all of its Senior Notes at any time at redemption prices set forth in the Senior Indenture. Upon the occurrence of a change of control triggering event, which is defined in the Senior Indenture, each holder of the Senior Notes has the right to require the Company to repurchase some or all of such holder’s Senior Notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the repurchase date.

The Senior Indenture contains covenants limiting, among other things, the ability of the Company and its

subsidiaries to (subject to certain exceptions): consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; and to incur or guarantee indebtedness secured by liens on any shares of voting stock of significant subsidiaries.

The Senior Indenture also provides for events of default which, if any of them occurs, would permit or

require the principal of and accrued interest on the Senior Notes to become or to be declared due and payable, as applicable.

Scheduled debt maturities at February 1, 2019, including capital lease obligations, for the Company’s fiscal years listed below are as follows (in thousands): 2019 - $368,850; 2020 - $1,958; 2021 - $1,913; 2022 - $1,791; 2023 - $901,418; thereafter - $1,608,307.

60 2018 Form 10-K

5. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities required to be measured at fair value as of February 1, 2019, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements are classified.

Quoted Prices in Active Markets Significant for Identical Other Significant Total Fair Assets and Observable Unobservable Value at Liabilities Inputs Inputs February 1, (In thousands) (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) 2019

Liabilities: Long-term obligations (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,480,044 $ 384,236 $ — $ 2,864,280 Deferred compensation (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,896 — — 24,896

(a) Included in the consolidated balance sheet at book value as Current portion of long-term obligations of $1,950

and Long-term obligations of $2,862,740. (b) Reflected at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet as a component of Accrued expenses and other

current liabilities of $2,043 and a component of noncurrent Other liabilities of $22,853.

The carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, receivables and payables approximate their respective fair values. The Company does not have any recurring fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of February 1, 2019.

6. Commitments and contingencies Leases

As of February 1, 2019, the Company was committed under operating lease agreements for most of its retail stores. Many of the Company’s stores are subject to build-to-suit arrangements with landlords which typically carry a primary lease term of up to 15 years with multiple renewal options. The Company also has stores subject to shorter-term leases and many of these leases have renewal options. Certain of the Company’s leased stores have provisions for contingent rent based upon a specified percentage of defined sales volume.

The land and buildings of the Company’s DCs in Missouri, Mississippi and California are subject to

operating lease agreements and the leased DC in Oklahoma is subject to a financing arrangement. Certain leases contain restrictive covenants, and as of February 1, 2019, the Company is not aware of any material violations of such covenants.

The Company is accounting for its DC in Oklahoma as a financing obligation as a result of, among other

things, the lessor’s ability to put the property back to the Company under certain circumstances. The property and equipment, along with the related lease obligation associated with this transaction are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company is the owner of a secured promissory note (the “Ardmore Note”) which represents debt issued by the third party entity from which the Company leases the DC in Oklahoma and therefore the Company holds the debt instrument pertaining to its lease financing obligation. Because a legal right of offset exists, the Company is accounting for the Ardmore Note as a reduction of its outstanding financing obligation in its consolidated balance sheets.

2018 Form 10-K 61

Future minimum payments as of February 1, 2019 for operating leases are as follows:

(In thousands)

2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,185,608 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,135,292 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,073,768 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,004,124 2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928,989 Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,518,502 Total minimum payments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9,846,283

As of February 1, 2019, total future minimum payments for capital leases were $13.3 million, with a

present value of $11.0 million. The gross amount of property and equipment recorded under capital leases and financing obligations at each of February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018, was $36.2 million. Accumulated depreciation on property and equipment under capital leases and financing obligations at February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018, was $14.3 million and $12.4 million, respectively.

Rent expense under all operating leases is as follows:

(In thousands) 2018 2017 2016

Minimum rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,154,429 $ 1,075,984 $ 935,663 Contingent rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,656 5,532 6,748 $ 1,159,085 $ 1,081,516 $ 942,411

Legal proceedings

From time to time, the Company is a party to various legal matters in the ordinary course of business, including actions by employees, consumers, suppliers, government agencies, or others. The Company has recorded accruals with respect to these matters, where appropriate, which are reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. For some matters, a liability is not probable or the amount cannot be reasonably estimated and therefore an accrual has not been made.

Except as described below, the Company believes, based upon information currently available, that such matters, both individually and in the aggregate, will be resolved without a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as a whole. However, litigation and other legal matters involve an element of uncertainty. Future developments in such matters, including adverse decisions or settlements or resulting required changes to the Company’s business operations, could affect our consolidated operating results when resolved in future periods or could result in liability or other amounts material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Wage and Hour/Employment Litigation

California Wage/Hour Litigation: The Company is defending a number of wage and hour lawsuits filed by California employees, including store employees (both key carriers and non-key carriers) as well as distribution center employees. The plaintiffs in these lawsuits allege, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated current and former California employees, that the Company failed to comply with California law in some or all of the following respects: failure to pay for all time worked, failure to provide meal and rest periods, failure to reimburse business-related expenses, failure to provide accurate wage statements, and failure to pay timely wages and provide appropriate termination pay. Plaintiffs seek to recover some or all of the following: alleged unpaid wages, injunctive relief, consequential damages, pre- and post-judgment interest, penalties under the Private Attorney General Act (the “PAGA”), and attorneys’ fees and costs.

Pennsylvania Wage/Hour Litigation: Plaintiff alleges that he and other similarly situated current and former hourly distribution center employees were subjected to unlawful policies and practices and were denied

62 2018 Form 10-K

regular and overtime wages in violation of federal and Pennsylvania law. Plaintiff seeks to proceed on a nationwide collective basis under federal law and a statewide class basis under Pennsylvania law and to recover alleged unpaid wages, liquidated damages, statutory damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs.

Tennessee Wage/Hour Litigation: Plaintiffs allege that they and other similarly situated current and former “key holders” were not paid for all hours worked in violation of federal, Illinois and Tennessee law. Plaintiffs seek to proceed on a nationwide collective basis under federal law and a statewide class basis under Illinois and Tennessee law and to recover alleged unpaid wages, statutory and common law damages, liquidated damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and attorneys’ fees and costs. The Company has reached a preliminary agreement with plaintiffs, which must be submitted to and approved by the Court, to resolve this matter for an amount not material to the Company’s financial statements as a whole.

California Suitable Seating Litigation: Plaintiff alleges that the Company failed to provide her and other current and former California store employees with “suitable seats” in violation of California law and seeks to recover penalties under the PAGA, injunctive relief, and attorneys’ fees and costs. The Company has reached a preliminary agreement with the plaintiff, which must be submitted to and approved by the Court, to resolve this matter for an amount not material to the Company’s financial statements as a whole.

California Credit Reporting Litigation: In addition to certain of the claims outlined in “California Wage/Hour Litigation” above, the plaintiff in this lawsuit alleges, on behalf of a nationwide class under federal law and a statewide class under California law, that the Company failed to provide applicants with adequate disclosures and summary of rights relating to certain background checks. With the exception of the claims outlined in “California Wage/Hour Litigation” above, the plaintiff has agreed to voluntarily dismiss his claims, and the Company does not expect these claims to have a material impact on its financial statements as a whole.

EEOC Litigation: The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) alleges that the Company’s use of post-offer, pre-employment physical assessments, as applied to candidates for the general warehouse position in the Bessemer, Alabama distribution center, violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (“GINA”). The EEOC seeks the following: back pay, front pay, pre-judgment interest, compensatory damages, punitive damages and injunctive relief.

The Company is vigorously defending the Wage and Hour/Employment Litigation and believes that its policies and practices comply with federal and state laws and that these actions are not appropriate for class or similar treatment. At this time, it is not possible to predict whether these matters ultimately will be permitted to proceed as a class or other similar action, or the size of any putative class or classes. Likewise, except as to the resolution of the Tennessee Wage/Hour Litigation, the California Suitable Seating Litigation and the California Credit Reporting Litigation, at this time it is not possible to estimate the value of the claims asserted, and no assurances can be given that the Company will be successful in its defense of these matters on the merits or otherwise. For these reasons, except as to the resolution of the Tennessee Wage/Hour Litigation, the California Suitable Seating Litigation and the California Credit Reporting Litigation, the Company is unable to estimate any potential loss or range of loss in these matters; however, if the Company is not successful in its defense efforts, the resolution of these actions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as a whole.

Consumer/Product Litigation

In December 2015 the Company was first notified of several lawsuits in which plaintiffs allege violation of state law, including state consumer protection laws, relating to the labeling, marketing and sale of certain Dollar General private-label motor oil. Each of these lawsuits, as well as additional, similar lawsuits filed after December 2015, was filed in, or removed to, various federal district courts of the United States (collectively “the Motor Oil Lawsuits”).

On June 2, 2016, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) granted the Company’s motion to centralize the Motor Oil Lawsuits in a matter styled In re Dollar General Corp. Motor Oil

2018 Form 10-K 63

Litigation, Case MDL No. 2709, before the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri (“Motor Oil MDL”). Subsequently, plaintiffs in the Motor Oil MDL filed a consolidated amended complaint, in which they seek to certify two nationwide classes and multiple statewide sub-classes and for each putative class member some or all of the following relief: compensatory damages, injunctive relief, statutory damages, punitive damages and attorneys’ fees. The Company’s motion to dismiss the allegations raised in the consolidated amended complaint was granted in part and denied in part. To the extent additional consumer lawsuits alleging violation of laws relating to the labeling, marketing and sale of Dollar General private-label motor oil have been or will be filed, the Company expects that such lawsuits will be transferred to the Motor Oil MDL.

In May 2017, the Company received a Notice of Proposed Action from the Office of the New Mexico Attorney General (the “New Mexico AG”) which alleges that the Company’s labeling, marketing and sale of certain Dollar General private-label motor oil violated New Mexico law (the “New Mexico Motor Oil Matter”). The State is represented in connection with this matter by counsel for plaintiffs in the Motor Oil MDL.

On June 20, 2017, the New Mexico AG filed an action in the First Judicial District Court, County of Santa Fe, New Mexico pertaining to the New Mexico Motor Oil Matter. (Hector H. Balderas v. Dolgencorp, LLC, Case No. D-101-cv-2017-01562). The Company removed this matter to New Mexico federal court on July 26, 2017, and filed a motion to dismiss the action. The matter was transferred to the Motor Oil MDL and the New Mexico AG has moved to remand it to state court. (Hector H. Balderas v. Dolgencorp, LLC, D.N.M., Case No. 1:17-cv-772). The Company’s and the New Mexico AG’s above-referenced motions are pending. The Company’s action for declaratory judgment enjoining the New Mexico AG from pursuing the New Mexico Motor Oil Matter was dismissed on September 28, 2018. (Dollar General Corporation v. Hector H. Balderas, D.N.M., Case No. 1:17-cv-00588).

On September 1, 2017, the Mississippi Attorney General (the “Mississippi AG”), who also is represented by the counsel for plaintiffs in the Motor Oil MDL, filed an action in the Chancery Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi in which the Mississippi AG alleges that the Company’s labeling, marketing and sale of certain Dollar General private-label motor oil violated Mississippi law. (Jim Hood v. Dollar General Corporation, Case No. G2017-1229 T/1) (the “Mississippi Motor Oil Matter”). The Company removed this matter to Mississippi federal court on October 5, 2017, and filed a motion to dismiss the action. The matter was transferred to the Motor Oil MDL and the Mississippi AG moved to remand it to state court. (Jim Hood v. Dollar General Corporation, N.D. Miss., Case No. 3:17-cv-801-LG-LRA). The Company’s and the Mississippi AG’s above-referenced motions are pending.

On January 30, 2018, the Company received a Civil Investigative Demand (“CID”) from the Office of the Louisiana Attorney General requesting information concerning the Company’s labeling, marketing and sale of certain Dollar General private-label motor oil (the “Louisiana Motor Oil Matter”). In response to the CID, the Company filed a petition for a protective order on February 20, 2018 in the 19th Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, Louisiana seeking to set aside the CID. (In re Dollar General Corp. and Dolgencorp, LLC, Case No. 666499). The Company’s petition is pending.

A mediation held in the Motor Oil MDL on February 26, 2018, was unsuccessful. On August 20, 2018, plaintiffs moved to certify two nationwide classes relating to their claims of alleged unjust enrichment and breach of implied warranties. In addition, plaintiffs moved to certify a multi-state class relating to their claims of breach of implied warranties and multiple statewide classes relating to their claims of alleged unfair trade practices/consumer fraud statutory claims, unjust enrichment and breach of implied warranties. The Company opposed the plaintiffs’ certification motion. On March 21, 2019, the court granted the plaintiffs’ certification motion as to 16 statewide classes regarding claims of unjust enrichment and 16 statewide classes regarding state consumer protection laws. The court denied plaintiffs’ motion in all other respects.

The Company is vigorously defending these matters and believes that the labeling, marketing and sale of its private-label motor oil comply with applicable federal and state requirements and are not misleading. The Company further believes that these matters are not appropriate for class or similar treatment. At this time, however, it is not possible to predict whether these matters will be permitted to proceed as a class or in a similar fashion, whether on a statewide or nationwide basis, or the size of any putative class or classes. Likewise, at this

64 2018 Form 10-K

time, it is not possible to estimate the value of the claims asserted, and no assurances can be given that the Company will be successful in its defense of these matters on the merits or otherwise. For these reasons, the Company is unable to estimate the potential loss or range of loss in these matters; however, if the Company is not successful in its defense efforts, the resolution of the Motor Oil MDL, the New Mexico Motor Oil Matter, the Mississippi Motor Oil Matter and/or the Louisiana Motor Oil Matter could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as a whole. 7. Benefit plans

The Dollar General Corporation 401(k) Savings and Retirement Plan, which became effective on

January 1, 1998, is a safe harbor defined contribution plan and is subject to the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act (“ERISA”).

A participant’s right to claim a distribution of his or her account balance is dependent on the plan, ERISA

guidelines and Internal Revenue Service regulations. All active participants are fully vested in all contributions to the 401(k) plan. During 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company expensed approximately $20.2 million, $17.5 million and $16.0 million, respectively, for matching contributions.

The Company also has a nonqualified supplemental retirement plan (“SERP”) and compensation deferral

plan (“CDP”), known as the Dollar General Corporation CDP/SERP Plan, for a select group of management and other key employees. The Company incurred compensation expense for these plans of approximately $0.7 million in each of 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The deferred compensation liability associated with the CDP/SERP Plan is reflected in the consolidated

balance sheets as further disclosed in Note 5. 8. Share-based payments

The Company accounts for share-based payments in accordance with applicable accounting standards,

under which the fair value of each award is separately estimated and amortized into compensation expense over the service period. The fair value of the Company’s stock option grants are estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model. The application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and highly sensitive in the determination of compensation expense. The fair value of the Company’s other share-based awards discussed below are estimated using the Company’s closing stock price on the grant date. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of valuation and reduce expense ratably over the vesting period.

On July 6, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, which plan

was subsequently amended and restated on several occasions (as so amended and restated, the “Plan”). The Plan allows the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, and other stock-based awards or dividend equivalent rights to key employees, directors, consultants or other persons having a service relationship with the Company, its subsidiaries and certain of its affiliates. The number of shares of Company common stock authorized for grant under the Plan is 31,142,858.

Since May 2011, most of the share-based awards issued by the Company have been in the form of stock

options, restricted stock units and performance share units, and unless noted otherwise, the disclosures that follow refer to such awards. With limited exceptions, stock options and restricted stock units granted to employees generally vest ratably on an annual basis over four-year and three-year periods, respectively. Awards granted to board members generally vest over a one-year period. The number of performance share units earned are based on performance criteria measured over a period of one to three years, and such awards generally vest over a three- year period. With limited exceptions, the performance share unit and restricted stock unit awards are payable in shares of common stock on the vesting date.

2018 Form 10-K 65

The weighted average for key assumptions used in determining the fair value of all stock options granted in the years ended February 1, 2019, February 2, 2018, and February 3, 2017, and a summary of the methodology applied to develop each assumption, are as follows:

February 1, February 2, February 3, 2019 2018 2017

Expected dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2 % 1.3 % 1.3 % Expected stock price volatility . . . . . . . . . . 25.0 % 25.5 % 25.4 % Weighted average risk-free interest rate . . 2.7 % 2.1 % 1.6 % Expected term of options (years) . . . . . . . . 6.3 6.3 6.3

Expected dividend yield - This is an estimate of the expected dividend yield on the Company’s stock. An

increase in the dividend yield will decrease compensation expense. Expected stock price volatility - This is a measure of the amount by which the price of the Company’s

common stock has fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate. An increase in the expected volatility will increase compensation expense.

Weighted average risk-free interest rate - This is the U.S. Treasury rate for the week of the grant having a term approximating the expected life of the option. An increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase compensation expense.

Expected term of options - This is the period of time over which the options granted are expected to remain outstanding. The Company has estimated the expected term as the mid-point between the vesting date and the contractual term of the option. An increase in the expected term will increase compensation expense.

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity during the year ended February 1, 2019 is as follows:

Average Remaining Options Exercise Contractual Intrinsic (Intrinsic value amounts reflected in thousands) Issued Price Term in Years Value

Balance, February 2, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . 3,076,913 $ 71.31 Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 764,783 93.72 Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (419,842) 65.74 Canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (164,604) 81.61 Balance, February 1, 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . 3,257,250 $ 76.76 7.3 $ 124,674 Exercisable at February 1, 2019 . . . . . . . 1,219,179 $ 67.17 5.9 $ 58,356

The weighted average grant date fair value per share of options granted was $24.37, $17.66 and $20.06

during 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The intrinsic value of options exercised during 2018, 2017 and 2016, was $15.4 million, $7.3 million and $17.3 million, respectively.

The number of performance share unit awards earned is based upon the Company’s financial performance as specified in the award agreement. A summary of performance share unit award activity during the year ended February 1, 2019 is as follows:

Units Intrinsic (Intrinsic value amounts reflected in thousands) Issued Value

Balance, February 2, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209,090 Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115,619 Converted to common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (105,613) Canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8,107) Balance, February 1, 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210,989 $ 24,272

66 2018 Form 10-K

The balance of performance share unit awards at February 1, 2019 includes 53,813 unvested awards, the number of which was computed based upon the performance targets specified in the awards. The number of such awards which will ultimately vest will be based in part on the Company’s financial performance in 2019 and 2020. The weighted average grant date fair value per share of performance share units granted was $92.98, $70.68 and $84.67 during 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

A summary of restricted stock unit award activity during the year ended February 1, 2019 is as follows:

Units Intrinsic (Intrinsic value amounts reflected in thousands) Issued Value

Balance, February 2, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491,968 Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261,550 Converted to common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (233,053) Canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (70,426) Balance, February 1, 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450,039 $ 51,772

The weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock units granted was $93.16, $70.90

and $84.56 during 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. At February 1, 2019, an additional 3,264 options issued prior to June 2011 were outstanding, all of which

were exercisable, with an aggregate intrinsic value of $0.3 million. The intrinsic value of such options exercised during 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $3.5 million, $6.9 million and $10.8 million, respectively.

At February 1, 2019, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock-based awards

was $65.1 million with an expected weighted average expense recognition period of 2.1 years.

The fair value method of accounting for share-based awards resulted in share-based compensation expense (a component of SG&A expenses) and a corresponding reduction in income before and net of income taxes as follows:

Stock Performance Restricted (In thousands) Options Share Units Stock Units Total

Year ended February 1, 2019 Pre-tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 14,556 $ 8,597 $ 17,726 $ 40,879 Net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,902 $ 6,439 $ 13,277 $ 30,618

Year ended February 2, 2018 Pre-tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 11,599 $ 6,159 $ 16,565 $ 34,323 Net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,223 $ 3,835 $ 10,315 $ 21,373

Year ended February 3, 2017 Pre-tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 12,008 $ 7,258 $ 17,701 $ 36,967 Net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,325 $ 4,427 $ 10,798 $ 22,550

9. Segment reporting

The Company manages its business on the basis of one reportable operating segment. See Note 1 for a brief description of the Company’s business. As of February 1, 2019, all of the Company’s operations were located within the United States with the exception of certain subsidiaries in Hong Kong and China, which collectively are not material with regard to assets, results of operations or otherwise, to the consolidated financial

2018 Form 10-K 67

statements. The following net sales data is presented in accordance with accounting standards related to disclosures about segments of an enterprise.

(in thousands) 2018 2017 2016

Classes of similar products: Consumables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19,865,086 $ 18,054,785 $ 16,798,881 Seasonal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,050,282 2,837,310 2,674,319 Home products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,506,054 1,400,618 1,373,397 Apparel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,203,621 1,178,254 1,140,001

Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25,625,043 $ 23,470,967 $ 21,986,598

10. Common stock transactions

On August 29, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a common stock repurchase program,

which the Board has since increased on several occasions. On March 13, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a $1.0 billion increase to the existing common stock repurchase program and as of such date, a cumulative total of $7.0 billion had been authorized under the program since its inception. The repurchase authorization has no expiration date and allows repurchases from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and number of shares purchased depends on a variety of factors, such as price, market conditions, compliance with the covenants and restrictions under the Company’s debt agreements and other factors. Repurchases under the program may be funded from available cash or borrowings including under the Company’s Revolving Facility and issuance of CP Notes discussed in further detail in Note 4.

During the years ended February 1, 2019, February 2, 2018, and February 3, 2017, the Company

repurchased approximately 9.9 million shares of its common stock at a total cost of $1.0 billion, approximately 7.1 million shares of its common stock at a total cost of $0.6 billion, and approximately 12.4 million shares of its common stock at a total cost of $1.0 billion, respectively, pursuant to its common stock repurchase program.

The Company paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.29 per share in 2018. On March 13, 2019, the

Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.32 per share, which is payable on or before April 23, 2019 to shareholders of record on April 9, 2019. The amount and declaration of future cash dividends is subject to the sole discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, the Company’s results of operations, cash requirements, financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that the Board may deem relevant in its sole discretion.

68 2018 Form 10-K

11. Quarterly financial data (unaudited)

The following is selected unaudited quarterly financial data for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018. Each quarterly period listed below was a 13-week accounting period. The sum of the four quarters for any given year may not equal annual totals due to rounding.

First Second Third Fourth (In thousands) Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter

2018: Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,114,463 $ 6,443,309 $ 6,417,462 $ 6,649,809 Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,862,249 1,974,873 1,895,059 2,071,689 Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490,184 545,476 442,143 638,503 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364,852 407,237 334,142 483,241 Basic earnings per share . . . . . . 1.36 1.53 1.26 1.85 Diluted earnings per share . . . . 1.36 1.52 1.26 1.84

First Second Third Fourth (In thousands) Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter

2017: Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,609,625 $ 5,828,305 $ 5,903,606 $ 6,129,431 Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,698,983 1,790,522 1,766,456 1,965,398 Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473,795 493,146 417,431 623,446 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279,489 294,783 252,533 712,155 Basic earnings per share . . . . . . 1.02 1.08 0.93 2.63 Diluted earnings per share . . . . 1.02 1.08 0.93 2.63

The Company purchased 15 retail store locations and assumed the lease obligations on approximately

300 retail store locations in 2017, and relocated certain of its existing stores to the acquired locations. As a result, the Company incurred expenses, primarily related to costs for remaining lease liabilities, of $7.3 million ($4.4 million net of tax, or $0.02 per diluted share), which was recognized in Selling, general and administrative expense in the second quarter of 2017.

In the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company closed an incremental 35 stores as result of a strategic review

process. The Company incurred $28.3 million of costs ($17.6 million net of tax, or $0.07 per diluted share) related to these store closings, most of which was in the form of SG&A expenses for remaining lease liabilities.

2018 Form 10-K 69

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Under the supervision and with the participation of our

management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management

prepared and is responsible for the consolidated financial statements and all related financial information contained in this report. This responsibility includes establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

To comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management

designed and implemented a structured and comprehensive assessment process to evaluate the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Such assessment was based on criteria established in Internal Control— Integrated Framework (2013 Framework) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Management regularly monitors our internal control over financial reporting, and actions are taken to correct any deficiencies as they are identified. Based on its assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as of February 1, 2019.

Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated

financial statements, has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting. Such attestation report is contained below.

70 2018 Form 10-K

(c) Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Dollar General Corporation Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Dollar General Corporation and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Dollar General Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight

Board (United States) (PCAOB), the 2018 consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated March 22, 2019, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial

reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we

plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the

risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable

assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect

misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that

2018 Form 10-K 71

controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP Nashville, Tennessee March 22, 2019

(d) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes during the quarter ended February 1, 2019 in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) or Rule 15d-15(f)) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

Long-Term Incentive Program: 2019 Annual Equity Grants

On March 20, 2019, the Company’s Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) awarded 128,398 non-

qualified stock options (“Options”) and 34,124 performance share units (“PSUs”) to Mr. Vasos, 21,667 Options and 5,758 PSUs to Messrs. Garratt and Reiser, and 24,877 Options and 6,611 PSUs to Mr. Owen on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the form of Option award agreement (“Form Option Agreement”) and form of PSU award agreement (“Form PSU Agreement”) attached hereto as Exhibit 10.7 and Exhibit 10.15, respectively (collectively, the “Form Award Agreements”), and subject to the terms and conditions of the previously filed Dollar General Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.

The Options, which were granted on terms substantially similar to the prior year, have a term of ten years

and, subject to earlier forfeiture or accelerated vesting under certain circumstances described in the Form Option Agreement, generally will vest in four equal annual installments beginning on April 1, 2020.

The PSUs represent a target number of units that can be earned if certain performance measures are

achieved during the applicable performance periods and if certain additional vesting requirements are met. Fifty percent of the target number of PSUs is subject to an adjusted EBITDA performance measure with a performance period of the Company’s fiscal year 2019. The other fifty percent of the target number of PSUs is subject to an adjusted ROIC performance measure which is the average of adjusted ROIC for the Company’s fiscal years 2019, 2020 and 2021. All performance measures were established by the Committee on the grant date. The number of PSUs earned will vary between 0% and 300% of the target amount based on actual performance compared to target performance on a graduated scale, with performance at the target level resulting in 100% of the target number of PSUs being earned. At the conclusion of each applicable performance period, the Committee will determine the level of achievement of each performance goal measure and the corresponding number of PSUs earned by each grantee. Subject to certain pro-rata vesting conditions, one-third of the PSUs earned by each grantee for adjusted EBITDA performance will vest in equal installments on April 1, 2020, April 1, 2021 and April 1, 2022, in each case subject to the grantee’s continued employment with the Company and certain accelerated vesting provisions described in the Form PSU Agreement. Subject to certain pro-rata vesting conditions, the PSUs earned by each grantee for adjusted ROIC performance will vest on April 1, 2022, subject to the grantee’s continued employment with the Company and certain accelerated vesting provisions described in the Form PSU Agreement.

The foregoing descriptions of all Options and PSU awards and the Form Award Agreements are

summaries only, do not purport to be complete, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the filed Form Option Agreement and Form PSU Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit 10.7 and Exhibit 10.15, respectively.

72 2018 Form 10-K

Short-Term Incentive Program: 2019 Teamshare

On March 20, 2019, the Committee approved the Company’s 2019 short-term incentive bonus program applicable to the Company’s named executive officers (“2019 Teamshare”) on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the 2019 Teamshare bonus program document attached hereto as Exhibit 10.34.

The Committee again selected adjusted EBIT as the Company-wide performance measure for 2019 Teamshare and established the target level of adjusted EBIT consistent with adjusted EBIT in the Company’s fiscal year 2019 financial plan previously approved by the Board of Directors in January 2019. The Committee determined that adjusted EBIT shall mean the Company’s Operating Profit as calculated in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, but shall exclude the impact of (a) any costs, fees and expenses directly related to the consideration, negotiation, preparation, or consummation of any asset sale, merger or other transaction that results in a Change in Control (within the meaning of the Dollar General Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan) of the Company or any offering of Company common stock or other security; (b) disaster-related charges; (c) any gains or losses associated with the Company’s LIFO computation; and (d) unless the Committee disallows any such item, (i) any unbudgeted loss as a result of the resolution of a legal matter or (ii) any unplanned loss(es) or gain(s) related to the implementation of accounting or tax legislative changes or (iii) any unplanned loss(es) or gain(s) of a non-recurring nature, provided that in the case of each of (i), (ii) and (iii) such amount equals or exceeds $1 million from a single loss or gain, as applicable, and $10 million in the aggregate. The Committee established the threshold below which no bonus may be paid under 2019 Teamshare at 90% of the target level of the adjusted EBIT performance measure and the maximum above which no additional bonus may be paid at 120% of the target level of the adjusted EBIT performance measure. The amount of bonus paid to named executive officers will vary between 0% and 300% of the target bonus payment amount based on actual Company performance compared to target performance on a graduated scale, with performance at the target level resulting in 100% of the target bonus amount being earned, subject to individual eligibility requirements and additional individual performance factors. If a named executive officer is determined to be eligible to receive a 2019 Teamshare bonus payout in accordance with the eligibility rules, adjustments to bonus payouts may be made upward or downward based upon individual performance or other factors. Mr. Vasos’s target percentage of base salary payout for 2019 Teamshare is 150%, and Messrs. Garratt, Owen, Ravener and Reiser’s target percentage of base salary payout for 2019 Teamshare is 75%.

The foregoing description of 2019 Teamshare is a summary only, does not purport to be complete, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the filed 2019 Teamshare Bonus Program document attached hereto as Exhibit 10.34.

2018 Form 10-K 73

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (a) Information Regarding Directors and Executive Officers. The information required by this Item 10

regarding our directors and director nominees is contained under the captions “Who are the nominees this year” and “Are there any family relationships between any of the directors, executive officers or nominees,” in each case under the heading “Proposal 1: Election of Directors” in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 29, 2019 (the “2019 Proxy Statement”), which information under such captions is incorporated herein by reference. Information required by this Item 10 regarding our executive officers is contained in Part I of this Form 10-K under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant,” which information under such caption is incorporated herein by reference.

(b) Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Information required by this Item 10 regarding

compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is contained under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” under the heading “Security Ownership” in the 2019 Proxy Statement, which information under such caption is incorporated herein by reference.

(c) Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that

applies to all of our employees, officers and Board members. This Code is posted on the Investor Information section of our Internet website at www.dollargeneral.com. If we choose to no longer post such Code, we will provide a free copy to any person upon written request to Dollar General Corporation, c/o Investor Relations Department, 100 Mission Ridge, Goodlettsville, TN 37072. We intend to provide any required disclosure of an amendment to or waiver from such Code that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, on our Internet website located at www.dollargeneral.com promptly following the amendment or waiver. We may elect to disclose any such amendment or waiver in a report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC either in addition to or in lieu of the website disclosure. The information contained on or connected to our Internet website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this or any other report that we file with or furnish to the SEC.

(d) Procedures for Shareholders to Recommend Director Nominees. There have been no material

changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s Board of Directors.

(e) Audit Committee Information. Information required by this Item 10 regarding our audit committee

and our audit committee financial experts is contained under the captions “What functions are performed by the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating Committees” and “Does Dollar General have an audit committee financial expert serving on its Audit Committee,” in each case under the heading “Corporate Governance” in the 2019 Proxy Statement, which information pertaining to the audit committee and its membership and audit committee financial experts under such captions is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this Item 11 regarding director and executive officer compensation, the Compensation Committee Report, the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for employees, pay ratio disclosure, and compensation committee interlocks and insider participation is contained under the captions “Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation” in the 2019 Proxy Statement, which information under such captions is incorporated herein by reference.

74 2018 Form 10-K

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

(a) Equity Compensation Plan Information. The following table sets forth information about securities

authorized for issuance under our compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) as of February 1, 2019:

Number of securities remaining available for future Number of securities issuance under to be issued upon Weighted-average equity compensation exercise of exercise price of plans (excluding outstanding options, outstanding options, securities reflected warrants and rights warrants and rights in column (a)) Plan category (a) (b) (c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,043,349 $ 76.72 15,930,280

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — Total(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,043,349 $ 76.72 15,930,280

(1) Column (a) consists of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and upon

vesting and payment of restricted stock units, performance share units and deferred shares, including dividend equivalents accrued thereon, under the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. Restricted stock units, performance share units, deferred shares and dividend equivalents are settled for shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis and have no exercise price. Accordingly, they have been excluded for purposes of computing the weighted-average exercise price in column (b). Column (c) consists of shares reserved for issuance pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, whether in the form of stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance share units or other stock-based awards or upon the exercise of an option or right.

(b) Other Information. The information required by this Item 12 regarding security ownership of certain

beneficial owners and our management is contained under the caption “Security Ownership” in the 2019 Proxy Statement, which information under such caption is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR

INDEPENDENCE The information required by this Item 13 regarding certain relationships and related transactions is

contained under the caption “Transactions with Management and Others” in the 2019 Proxy Statement, which information under such caption is incorporated herein by reference.

The information required by this Item 13 regarding director independence is contained under the caption

“Director Independence” in the 2019 Proxy Statement, which information under such caption is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this Item 14 regarding fees we paid to our principal accountant and the pre-

approval policies and procedures established by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is contained under the caption “Fees Paid to Auditors” in the 2019 Proxy Statement, which information under such caption is incorporated herein by reference.

2018 Form 10-K 75

PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (a) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Consolidated Balance Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Consolidated Statements of Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 (b) All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not

required under the related instructions, are inapplicable or the information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and, therefore, have been omitted.

(c) Exhibits:

EXHIBIT INDEX

3.1 Amended and Restated Charter of Dollar General Corporation (complete copy as amended for SEC

filing purposes only) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 3, 2013, filed with the SEC on June 4, 2013 (file no. 001-11421))

3.2 Bylaws of Dollar General Corporation (as amended and restated on March 23, 2017) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2017, filed with the SEC on March 24, 2017 (file no. 001-11421))

4.1 Form of Stock Certificate for Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-161464))

4.2 Form of 3.250% Senior Notes due 2023 (included in Exhibit 4.7) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Dollar General Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2013, filed with the SEC on April 11, 2013 (file no. 001-11421))

4.3 Form of 4.150% Senior Notes due 2025 (included in Exhibit 4.8) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 15, 2015, filed with the SEC on October 20, 2015 (file no. 001-11421))

4.4 Form of 3.875% Senior Notes due 2027 (included in Exhibit 4.9) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 11, 2017, filed with the SEC on April 11, 2017 (file no. 001-11421))

4.5 Form of 4.125% Senior Notes due 2028 (included in Exhibit 4.10) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 10, 2018, filed with the SEC on April 10, 2018 (file no. 001-11421))

4.6 Indenture, dated as of July 12, 2012, between Dollar General Corporation, as issuer, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 12, 2012, filed with the SEC on July 17, 2012 (file no. 001-11421))

76 2018 Form 10-K

4.7 Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 11, 2013, between Dollar General Corporation, as issuer, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Dollar General Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2013, filed with the SEC on April 11, 2013 (file no. 001-11421))

4.8 Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 20, 2015, between Dollar General Corporation, as issuer, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 15, 2015, filed with the SEC on October 20, 2015 (file no. 001-11421))

4.9 Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 11, 2017, between Dollar General Corporation and

U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 11, 2017, filed with the SEC on April 11, 2017 (file no. 001-11421))

4.10 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 10, 2018, between Dollar General Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 10, 2018, filed with the SEC on April 10, 2018 (file no. 001-11421))

4.11 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2017, among Dollar General Corporation, as borrower, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other credit parties and lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 22, 2017, filed with the SEC on February 22, 2017 (file no. 001-11421))

4.12 Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 4, 2019, among

Dollar General Corporation, as borrower, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other credit parties and lenders party thereto

10.1 Dollar General Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (adopted November 30, 2016 and approved by shareholders on May 31, 2017) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 28, 2016, filed with the SEC on December 1, 2016 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.2 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (approved May 24, 2011) for awards made prior to December 2014 to certain newly hired and promoted employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2011, filed with the SEC on June 1, 2011 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.3 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (approved March 20, 2012) for annual awards beginning March 2012 and prior to March 2015 to certain employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 20, 2012, filed with the SEC on March 26, 2012 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.4 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (approved August 26, 2014) for annual awards beginning March 2015 and prior to March 2016 to certain employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2014, filed with the SEC on December 4, 2014 (file no. 001-11421))*

2018 Form 10-K 77

10.5 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (approved March 16, 2016) for awards beginning March 2016 and prior to March 2017 to certain employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2016, filed with the SEC on March 22, 2016 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.6 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (approved March 22, 2017) for awards beginning March 2017 and prior to March 2018 to certain employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Dollar General Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2017, filed with the SEC on March 24, 2017 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.7 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (approved March 21, 2018) for awards beginning March

2018 to certain employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Dollar General Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2018, filed with the SEC on March 23, 2018 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.8 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (approved August 26, 2014) for awards beginning December 2014 and prior to May 2016 to certain newly hired and promoted employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2014, filed with the SEC on December 4, 2014 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.9 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (approved May 24, 2016) for awards beginning May 2016

and prior to March 2017 to certain newly hired and promoted employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2016, filed with the SEC on May 26, 2016 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.10 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (approved March 22, 2017) for awards beginning March

2017 and prior to December 2017 to certain newly hired and promoted employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Dollar General Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2017, filed with the SEC on March 24, 2017 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.11 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (approved December 5, 2017) for awards beginning

December 2017 to certain newly hired and promoted employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Dollar General Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 3, 2017, filed with the SEC on December 7, 2017 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.12 Form of Performance Share Unit Award Agreement (approved March 16, 2016) for 2016 awards to

certain employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2016, filed with the SEC on March 22, 2016 (file no. 001-11421))*

78 2018 Form 10-K

10.13 Form of Performance Share Unit Award Agreement (approved March 22, 2017) for 2017 awards to certain employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Dollar General Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2017, filed with the SEC on March 24, 2017 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.14 Form of Performance Share Unit Award Agreement (approved March 21, 2018) for 2018 awards to certain employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Dollar General Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2018, filed with the SEC on March 23, 2018 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.15 Form of Performance Share Unit Award Agreement (approved March 20, 2019) for 2019 awards to certain employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Dollar General Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan*

10.16 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (approved March 16, 2016) for awards beginning March 2016 and prior to March 2017 to certain employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2016, filed with the SEC on March 22, 2016 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.17 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (approved March 22, 2017) for awards beginning March 2017 and prior to March 2018 to certain employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Dollar General Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2017, filed with the SEC on March 24, 2017 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.18 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (approved March 21, 2018) for awards beginning March 2018 to certain employees of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Dollar General Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2018, filed with the SEC on March 23, 2018 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.19 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for awards prior to May 2011 to non-employee directors of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Dollar General Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-161464))

10.20 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (approved May 24, 2011) for awards beginning May 2011 and prior to May 2014 to non-employee directors of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2011, filed with the SEC on June 1, 2011 (file no. 001-11421))

10.21 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (approved May 28, 2014) for awards beginning May 2014 and prior to February 2015 to non-employee directors of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 2, 2014, filed with the SEC on June 3, 2014 (file no. 001-11421))

2018 Form 10-K 79

10.22 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (approved December 3, 2014) for awards beginning February 2015 and prior to May 2016 to non-employee directors of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2014, filed with the SEC on December 4, 2014 (file no. 001-11421))

10.23 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (approved May 24, 2016) for awards beginning May 2016 and prior to May 2017 to non-employee directors of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2016, filed with the SEC on May 26, 2016 (file no. 001-11421))

10.24 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (approved May 30, 2017) for awards beginning May 2017 to non-employee directors of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Dollar General Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 5, 2017, filed with the SEC on June 1, 2017 (file no. 001-11421))

10.25 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (approved January 26, 2016) for awards beginning February 1, 2016 and prior to November 28, 2018 to non-executive Chairmen of the Board of Directors of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2016, filed with the SEC on March 22, 2016 (file no. 001-11421))

10.26 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (approved November 28, 2018) for awards beginning after November 28, 2018 to non-executive Chairmen of the Board of Directors of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Dollar General Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 2, 2018, filed with the SEC on December 4, 2018 (file no. 01-11421))

10.27 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement for awards to non-employee directors of Dollar General Corporation pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Dollar General Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-161464))

10.28 Dollar General Corporation CDP/SERP Plan (as amended and restated effective December 31, 2007) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Dollar General Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (file no. 333-148320))*

10.29 First Amendment to the Dollar General Corporation CDP/SERP Plan (as amended and restated effective December 31, 2007) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Dollar General Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (file no. 333-148320))*

10.30 Second Amendment to the Dollar General Corporation CDP/SERP Plan (as amended and restated effective December 31, 2007), dated as of June 3, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 1, 2008, filed with the SEC on September 3, 2008 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.31 Dollar General Corporation Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan (approved December 3, 2014) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2014, filed with the SEC on December 4, 2014 (file no. 001-11421))

80 2018 Form 10-K

10.32 Amended and Restated Dollar General Corporation Annual Incentive Plan (adopted November 30, 2016 and approved by shareholders on May 31, 2017) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 28, 2016, filed with the SEC on December 1, 2016 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.33 Dollar General Corporation 2018 Teamshare Bonus Program for Named Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2018, filed with the SEC on March 23, 2018 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.34 Dollar General Corporation 2019 Teamshare Bonus Program for Named Executive Officers*

10.35 Summary of Dollar General Corporation Life Insurance Program as Applicable to Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2018, filed with the SEC on March 23, 2018 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.36 Dollar General Corporation Executive Relocation Policy, as amended (effective March 21, 2018) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2018, filed with the SEC on March 23, 2018 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.37 Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation effective February 3, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 3, 2017, filed with the SEC on December 7, 2017 (file no. 001-11421))

10.38 Employment Agreement, effective June 3, 2018, between Dollar General Corporation and Todd J. Vasos (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to Dollar General Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on May 31, 2018 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.39 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement between Dollar General Corporation and Todd J. Vasos for June 3, 2015 award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Dollar General Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 27, 2015, filed with the SEC on May 28, 2015 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.40 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement between Dollar General Corporation and Todd J. Vasos (approved March 16, 2016) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2016, filed with the SEC on March 22, 2016 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.41 Form of Executive Vice President Employment Agreement with attached Schedule of Executive Vice Presidents who have executed the Executive Vice President Employment Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to Dollar General Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2018, filed with the SEC on April 11, 2018 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.42 Amended Schedule of Executive Vice Presidents who have executed an Executive Vice President Employment Agreement in the form filed as Exhibit 10.41 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 2, 2018, filed with the SEC on December 4, 2018 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.43 Form of Senior Vice President Employment Agreement with attached Schedule of Senior Vice President-level Executive Officers who have executed the Senior Vice President Employment Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 4, 2018, filed with the SEC on May 31, 2018 (file no. 001-11421))*

2018 Form 10-K 81

10.44 Amended Schedule of Senior Vice President-level Executive Officers who have executed a Senior Vice President Employment Agreement in the form filed as Exhibit 10.43 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 2, 2018, filed with the SEC on December 4, 2018 (file no. 01-11421))*

10.45 Omnibus Limited Waiver by Dollar General Corporation to the Employment Agreement and Employment Transition Agreement with certain employees of Dollar General Corporation, effective January 28, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to Dollar General Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2016, filed with the SEC on March 22, 2016 (file no. 001-11421))*

10.46 Employment Agreement, effective August 7, 2015, between Dollar General Corporation and James W. Thorpe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Dollar General Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 30, 2015, filed with the SEC on December 3, 2015 (file no. 001-11421))*

21 List of Subsidiaries of Dollar General Corporation

23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

24 Powers of Attorney (included as part of the signature pages hereto)

31 Certifications of CEO and CFO under Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)

32 Certifications of CEO and CFO under 18 U.S.C. 1350

101.INS XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document

101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

* Management Contract or Compensatory Plan ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None

82 2018 Form 10-K

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION Date: March 22, 2019 By: /s/ Todd J. Vasos Todd J. Vasos, Chief Executive Officer

We, the undersigned directors and officers of the registrant, hereby severally constitute Todd J. Vasos, John W. Garratt and Anita C. Elliott, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them and each of them to sign for us, and in our names in the capacities indicated below, any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name Title Date

/s/ Todd J. Vasos Chief Executive Officer & Director March 22, 2019 TODD J. VASOS (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ John W. Garratt

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

March 22, 2019

JOHN W. GARRATT (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Anita C. Elliott

Senior Vice President & Chief Accounting Officer

March 22, 2019

ANITA C. ELLIOTT (Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Warren F. Bryant Director March 22, 2019 WARREN F. BRYANT

/s/ Michael M. Calbert Director March 22, 2019 MICHAEL M. CALBERT

/s/ Sandra B. Cochran Director March 22, 2019 SANDRA B. COCHRAN

/s/ Patricia D. Fili-Krushel Director March 22, 2019 PATRICIA D. FILI-KRUSHEL

/s/ Timothy I. McGuire Director March 22, 2019 TIMOTHY I. MCGUIRE

/s/ William C. Rhodes, III Director March 22, 2019 WILLIAM C. RHODES, III

/s/ Ralph E. Santana Director March 22, 2019 RALPH E. SANTANA

Michael M. Calbert (1) Retired Member KKR & Co. L.P. Warren F. Bryant (2)(3) Retired Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Longs Drug Stores Corporation

Sandra B. Cochran (2)(4)* President & Chief Executive Officer Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.

Patricia D. Fili-Krushel (3)*(4) Chief Executive Officer Center for Talent Innovation

Timothy I. McGuire (3) Chief Executive Officer Mobile Service Center Canada, Ltd. (d/b/a Mobile Klinik)

William C. Rhodes, III (2)*(4) Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer AutoZone, Inc.

Ralph E. Santana (4) Executive Vice President & Chief Marketing Officer Harman International Industries

Todd J. Vasos† Chief Executive Officer Dollar General Corporation

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENTS John W. Garratt† Chief Financial Officer

Michael J. Kindy† Global Supply Chain

Jeffery C. Owen† Store Operations

Robert D. Ravener† Chief People Officer

Jason S. Reiser† Chief Merchandising Officer

Rhonda M. Taylor† General Counsel

Carman R. Wenkoff† Chief Information Officer

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENTS Steven R. Deckard Corporate Store Operations

Anita C. Elliott† Chief Accounting Officer

Lawrence J. Gatta General Merchandise Manager

Tracey N. Herrmann Store Operations

Daniel J. Nieser Real Estate & Store Development

Kathleen A. Reardon Human Resources

Steven G. Sunderland Store Operations

Emily C. Taylor General Merchandise Manager

Bryan D. Wheeler General Merchandise Manager

Antonio Zuazo Inventory & Transportation

TRANSFER AGENT EQ Shareowner Services PO Box 64854, St. Paul, MN 55164-0854 www.shareowneronline.com

Inquiries regarding stock transfers, lost certificates or address changes should be directed to the transfer agent at the address or website noted above or by calling (866) 927-3314.

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Ernst & Young LLP, Nashville, Tennessee

FORM 10-K; SEC CERTIFICATIONS A copy of the Form 10-K filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for

the fiscal year ended February 1, 2019, which includes as exhibits the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certifications required to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, is available on our website at www.dollargeneral.com in the Investor Information section or on the SEC’s website.

A printed copy of the Form 10-K, and a list of all its exhibits, will be supplied without charge to any shareholder upon written request. Exhibits to the Form 10-K are available for a reasonable fee. For a printed copy of the Form 10-K, please contact:

DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION INVESTOR RELATIONS 100 Mission Ridge, Goodlettsville, TN 37072

(615) 855-4000

Todd J. Vasos† Chief Executive Officer

† Indicates persons designated as the Company’s executive officers

(1) Chairman of the Board (2) Audit Committee (3) Compensation Committee (4) Nominating & Governance Committee (*) Committee Chairperson

DIRECTORS

SENIOR OFFICERS

CORPORATE INFORMATION

.

$20.4

$18.9

$22.0 $23.5

20162014 2015 2017

11,789

12,483 13,320

14,534

2014 2015 2016 2017

2.8% 2.8% 2.7% 0.9%

2014 2015 20172016

$1,392 $1,605

$1,327

$1,802

2015 20162014 2017

$25.6

2018

15,370

2018

3.2%

2018

2018

$2,144

A N N U A L M E E T I N G Dollar General Corporation’s annual meeting of

shareholders is scheduled for 9 a.m. Central Time on

Wednesday, May 29, 2019, at:

Goodlettsville City Hall Auditorium 105 South Main Street, Goodlettsville, TN 37072

Shareholders of record as of March 21, 2019 are entitled

to vote at the meeting.

N Y S E : D G The common stock of Dollar General Corporation is

traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the

trading symbol “DG.” The number of shareholders of

record as of March 21, 2019 was 2,556.

S T O C K P E R F O R M A N C E G R A P H The graph below compares Dollar General Corporation’s

cumulative total shareholder return on common stock

with the cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 index

and the S&P Retailing index. The graph tracks the

performance of a $100 investment in our common

stock and in each index (with the reinvestment of all

dividends) from January 31, 2014 to February 1, 2019.

C O M PA R I S O N O F C U M U L A T I V E T O T A L R E T U R N

The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

Fiscal 2016 includes 53 weeks, while all other years presented contain 52 weeks. Sales in the 2016

53rd week were approximately $399 million.

N E T S A L E S (IN BILLIONS)

E N D I N G S T O R E C O U N T

S A M E S T O R E S A L E S G R O W T H

C A S H F R O M O P E R A T I O N S (IN MILLIONS)

$150

$200

$250

$100

$300

$350

1/31/14 1/30/15 1/29/16 2/3/17 2/2/18 2/1/19

$119.07

$119.10

$114.22 $113.46

$140.73

$134.88 $133.09

$136.20

$167.11

$183.39

$172.17

$241.08

$214.57

$168.19

$256.26

Dollar General

S&P 500 Index

S&P Retailing Index

$100

$100

$100

1/31/14 1/30/15 1/29/16 2/3/17 2/2/18 2/1/19

S&P Retailing IndexS&P 500 IndexDollar General Corporation

A D D R E S S 100 MISSION RIDGE GOODLETTSVILLE, TN 37072

P H O N E 615-855-4000

W E B WWW.DOLLARGENERAL.COM