Discussion Forum
shobiii....
DF2Rebruic.xlsxSirman
| PPMP 20009 Marking Rubric Assessment 1 (Individual Work - 40%) | 12068889 | |||||||
| Attributes | Fail | Developing | Competent | Accomplished | Outstanding | Marks Awarded | Marker's comments | |
| 1a. Correct usage of processes for effective stakeholder management | • Process for stakeholder management not identified | n/a | • Weak identification and description of Stakeholder Management processes | n/a | • There is a clear identification and description of the stakeholder management processes which includes all the relevant information. • Gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | 1.5 | You presented the processes of SK management as PMBOK and PRINCE2. However, this is a general use of the management processes lacking the relevant information and precise tackling of the event. | |
| Marks available (out of 3 marks) | 0 | 0.5 / 1.0 / 1.5 | 2.0 / 2.5 / 3.0 | |||||
| 1b. Correct identification of critical stakeholders | • Totally incorrect identification of stakeholders | n/a | Incomplete identification of stakeholders. Some stakeholders are identified but is difficult to read and does not relate | n/a | • Full list of stakeholder are identified and clearly described which includes all the relevant information. • Gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | 0.5 | although the report shows the SK matrix diagram, it does not show the relevant SK identification. No identification of Qatar 2022 SK was provided and this is incpmplete workidentification. | |
| Marks available (out of 3 marks) | 0 | 0.5 / 1.0 / 1.5 | 2.0 / 2.5 /3.0 | |||||
| 2. Ways or areas to implement lean project management | • Did not mention any best practices to implement lean project management • Did not describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Did not describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | • Identified ONE best practice to implement lean project management • Vaguely describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Did not describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | • Identified TWO best practice to implement lean project management • Satisfactorily describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | • Identified THREE best practice to implement lean project management • Clearly describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | • Identified more than THREE best practice to implement lean project management • Clearly describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | 2 | The ways for minimsing waste in the event are very general (not sure what the JIT is). You talked about non value adding activities but without any example or detailed explanation how does this work in this project. Same when you mentioned the standarization! Although you explained in a shy detail the security aspects, the example you gave does not reflect the waste minimsation (why using 100 camera CCTV?) | |
| Marks available (out of 8 marks) | 0 | 0.5 / 1.0/ 1.5/ 2.0 | 2.5 / 3.0 / 3.5 / 4.0 | 4.5/ 5.0 / 5.5 / 6.0 | 6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5 / 8.0 | |||
| 3.Identify and elaborate processes from PMBOK,PRINCE2,OPM,Agile Practices and Lean Six Sigma (DMAIC Methodology) that could support your lean project implementation | 2 | |||||||
| PMBOK (out of 6 marks) | • Level of understanding about selected PMBOK process activities for a lean approach | None | Limited | Satisfactory | Clear | Excellent | 2.5 | In the application of PMBOK processes, you seem to mix the processes with the project phases. The explanation and application of processes is lacking the real management and the understanding of what the task requires you to identify. Neveretheless, you did explain the phases in a general context with satisfactory detailing of the management while you are giving example as in teh hospitality issue you mentioned in teh closing phase. Yet, this is limited linkage with the PMBOK |
| Marks available | 0 | 0.5 / 1.0 | 1.5 / 2.0 | 2.5 / 3.0 | 3.5 / 4.0 | |||
| • Linking to appropriate PMBOK knowledge area and process groups | None | None | Weak | Moderate | Strong | |||
| Marks available | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | |||
| PRINCE2 (out of 6 marks) | • Level of understanding about selected PRINCE2 processes for a lean approach | None | Limited | Satisfactory | Clear | Excellent | 2 | Same was noticed in explaining the PRINCE2 with limited linkage of principles and themes. even when you started to talk about the risk, you failed to explain the linkage between teh principles and themes with limited understanding to the issue was clear when mixing the risk, stakeholder, finance and resource management |
| Marks available | 0 | 0.5 /1.0 | 1.5 /2.0 | 2.5 /3.0 | 3.5 - 4.0 | |||
| • Linking to appropriate PRINCE2 principle and themes | None | None | Weak | Moderate | Strong | |||
| Marks available | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | |||
| OPM (out of 2 marks) | Marks available | • Did not mention any of OPM attributes | n/a | • Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of OPM • Makes weak connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach | n/a | • Demonstrates excellent understanding of OPM • Makes strong connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach | 0.5 | I am afraid there is weak demonestration of OPM concept in the report. Weak connection between the best practice and the lean was noticed especially when you talked about the plans, manpower, substages, project delivery stage! |
| 0 | 0.5 /1.0 | 1.5 /2.0 | ||||||
| Agile Practices (out of 2 marks) | Marks available | • Did not mention any of Agile attributes | n/a | • Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of Agile • Makes weak connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach | n/a | • Demonstrates excellent understanding of Agile • Makes strong connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach | 0.5 | While there is a clear definition of what agile management, the report did not provide diect link between the agile practice and the event in a specific manner. It is more general than what intended to be. The example provided in the assessement showed a sample of how your answers should look like. unfortunately you failed to be specific |
| 0 | 0.5 /1.0 | 1.5 /2.0 | ||||||
| Lean Six Sigma (out of 6 marks) | • Level of understanding about DMAIC methodology for a lean approach | None | Limited | Satisfactory | Clear | Excellent | 3.5 | The report showed in a better way the application of lean and DMAIC approch. It provides the reader with more real examples as in the case of risk management, SK management. It was good to express the process of DMAIC by reflecting this on the resources. However, this is still a general description and needs more details. Examples of what customer satisfaction, risks (in detail) |
| Marks available | 0 | 0.5 /1.0/1.5 | 2.0 /2.5 /3.0 | 3.5/ 4.0/ 4.5 | 5.0 /5.5 /6.0 | |||
| 4.Clarity of expression, grammar, spelling, final summary and correct APA style referencing (out of 4 marks) | Marks available | • The writing is difficult to follow, with incoherent or illogical arguments. • There are many errors of spelling or grammar. • Sections are unrelated. • No citations are included in the text of the essay, and there is no reference list at the end. | • The arguments make sense in places, but there are also illogical arguments, confusing sentences or sudden changes of topic. • There are numerous errors of spelling and grammar. • There is a reference list but it does not comply with APA refererencing style | • Most statements are clear but some require re-reading and guessing about meaning as they are not clear. • Sentence structure can be improved for simplicity, clarity and ease of comprehension. • Few grammar or spelling errors • APA referencing style is used with some format errors or inconsistencies. | • Statements are clear and well-connected. There is a logical flow of ideas. • Few spelling errors. • APA style is used almost perfectly with few errors or inconsistencies. | • Excellent clarity of expression at both the sentence and paragraph levels. • Well-structured with logical flow of ideas between paragraphs • Citations and References fully comply with APA style. | 3 | very well written report with good English. |
| 0 | 0.5 / 1.0 | 1.5 / 2.0 | 2.5 / 3.0 | 3.5/ 4.0 | ||||
| Total marks awarded (out of 40) | 16 | |||||||
| Notes: Definition of Criteria | ||||||||
| Criteria | Definition | |||||||
| Limited | Mostly incorrect named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and without justification for the use of the processes | |||||||
| Satisfactory | Some occurrence of incorrectly named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and with poor justification for the use of the processes | |||||||
| Clear | Correctly named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and with somewhat accurate justification for the use of the processes | |||||||
| Excellent | Correctly named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and with accurate justification for the use of the processes | |||||||
| None | Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes not discussed | |||||||
| Weak | Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes occasionally discussed | |||||||
| Moderate | Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes almost always discussed | |||||||
| Strong | Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes always discussed |
Farra Grace Del Castillo 120995
| PPMP 20009 Marking Rubric Assessment 1 (Individual Work - 40%) | 12099528 | |||||||
| Attributes | Fail | Developing | Competent | Accomplished | Outstanding | Marks Awarded | Marker's comments | |
| 1a. Correct usage of processes for effective stakeholder management | • Process for stakeholder management not identified | n/a | • Weak identification and description of Stakeholder Management processes | n/a | • There is a clear identification and description of the stakeholder management processes which includes all the relevant information. • Gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | 3 | Very well done on identifying the stakeholders and their management as per the PMBOK. Good use of teh refernce Forman and Discenza (2012) , and then listing the potential SH in this event with clear identification. The report shows clear identification of the SK management processes. | |
| Marks available (out of 3 marks) | 0 | 0.5 / 1.0 / 1.5 | 2.0 / 2.5 / 3.0 | |||||
| 1b. Correct identification of critical stakeholders | • Totally incorrect identification of stakeholders | n/a | Incomplete identification of stakeholders. Some stakeholders are identified but is difficult to read and does not relate | n/a | • Full list of stakeholder are identified and clearly described which includes all the relevant information. • Gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | 3 | This is a very good description and ldentification of the SH 2022 Commonwealth Games. Table 1, shows a good understanding of the subject and the relevant SH a critical analysis of each group with enough details about their roles and interest.The table shows clear understanding of the issue | |
| Marks available (out of 3 marks) | 0 | 0.5 / 1.0 / 1.5 | 2.0 / 2.5 /3.0 | |||||
| 2. Ways or areas to implement lean project management | • Did not mention any best practices to implement lean project management • Did not describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Did not describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | • Identified ONE best practice to implement lean project management • Vaguely describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Did not describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | • Identified TWO best practice to implement lean project management • Satisfactorily describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | • Identified THREE best practice to implement lean project management • Clearly describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | • Identified more than THREE best practice to implement lean project management • Clearly describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | 7.5 | Well done on identifying the areas of waste minimzation, You have identified THREE ares of waste minimization, The areas are very relevant and you tackled the waste resulted from each. You have showed mor than THREE best practice to implement lean management with clear description of the potential waste minmization | |
| Marks available (out of 8 marks) | 0 | 0.5 / 1.0/ 1.5/ 2.0 | 2.5 / 3.0 / 3.5 / 4.0 | 4.5/ 5.0 / 5.5 / 6.0 | 6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5 / 8.0 | |||
| 3.Identify and elaborate processes from PMBOK,PRINCE2,OPM,Agile Practices and Lean Six Sigma (DMAIC Methodology) that could support your lean project implementation | ||||||||
| PMBOK (out of 6 marks) | • Level of understanding about selected PMBOK process activities for a lean approach | None | Limited | Satisfactory | Clear | Excellent | 5 | You showed excellent understanding of PMBOK with good linkage of processes to the waste minimisation as in the example of transportation managemnt through procurement management. This shows a good understanding of teh PMBOK process activities for lean management. Although you stated the details of the procees, yet, there is not very clear example how this can be achieved and the linkage is a bit weak!. |
| Marks available | 0 | 0.5 / 1.0 | 1.5 / 2.0 | 2.5 / 3.0 | 3.5 / 4.0 | |||
| • Linking to appropriate PMBOK knowledge area and process groups | None | None | Weak | Moderate | Strong | |||
| Marks available | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | |||
| PRINCE2 (out of 6 marks) | • Level of understanding about selected PRINCE2 processes for a lean approach | None | Limited | Satisfactory | Clear | Excellent | 5.5 | A good level of understanding PRINCE2 was presented with good selection of the risk management process for lean managemnt. However, the report fails to specify what area of risk you are talking about and did not show corrolation to the event in a detailed manner |
| Marks available | 0 | 0.5 /1.0 | 1.5 /2.0 | 2.5 /3.0 | 3.5 - 4.0 | |||
| • Linking to appropriate PRINCE2 principle and themes | None | None | Weak | Moderate | Strong | |||
| Marks available | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | |||
| OPM (out of 2 marks) | Marks available | • Did not mention any of OPM attributes | n/a | • Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of OPM • Makes weak connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach | n/a | • Demonstrates excellent understanding of OPM • Makes strong connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach | 1 | The report does not show enough details about how to apply the OPM in this event. It lacks good connection of OPM and the lean management practice |
| 0 | 0.5 /1.0 | 1.5 /2.0 | ||||||
| Agile Practices (out of 2 marks) | Marks available | • Did not mention any of Agile attributes | n/a | • Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of Agile • Makes weak connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach | n/a | • Demonstrates excellent understanding of Agile • Makes strong connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach | 2 | The report showed a very high level of understanding lean management. The example of applying SCRUM in management using the sprint method indicated high level of what lean management and how to use it in meetings and communication |
| 0 | 0.5 /1.0 | 1.5 /2.0 | ||||||
| Lean Six Sigma (out of 6 marks) | • Level of understanding about DMAIC methodology for a lean approach | None | Limited | Satisfactory | Clear | Excellent | 5.5 | The report was successfully presenting excellent level of undrstanding of lean six sigma management with excellent example on how to use the DMAIC approch in transportation. The statstics, data and the details of the transportation management in this event showed excellent understanding to both the event and the application of this practice. It presented a very good approch on how to use this DMAIC in lean management and it was clear on how the six sigma can be implemented by definig the problem while using 13 venues and how this can affect the transportation system and the safety issues resulted. Then teh analysis using teh transportation plan and then to the control phase of the creating new lanes. |
| Marks available | 0 | 0.5 /1.0/1.5 | 2.0 /2.5 /3.0 | 3.5/ 4.0/ 4.5 | 5.0 /5.5 /6.0 | |||
| 4.Clarity of expression, grammar, spelling, final summary and correct APA style referencing (out of 4 marks) | Marks available | • The writing is difficult to follow, with incoherent or illogical arguments. • There are many errors of spelling or grammar. • Sections are unrelated. • No citations are included in the text of the essay, and there is no reference list at the end. | • The arguments make sense in places, but there are also illogical arguments, confusing sentences or sudden changes of topic. • There are numerous errors of spelling and grammar. • There is a reference list but it does not comply with APA refererencing style | • Most statements are clear but some require re-reading and guessing about meaning as they are not clear. • Sentence structure can be improved for simplicity, clarity and ease of comprehension. • Few grammar or spelling errors • APA referencing style is used with some format errors or inconsistencies. | • Statements are clear and well-connected. There is a logical flow of ideas. • Few spelling errors. • APA style is used almost perfectly with few errors or inconsistencies. | • Excellent clarity of expression at both the sentence and paragraph levels. • Well-structured with logical flow of ideas between paragraphs • Citations and References fully comply with APA style. | 3.5 | very well written report with excellent English. Occusional typos but does not impact the readrer |
| 0 | 0.5 / 1.0 | 1.5 / 2.0 | 2.5 / 3.0 | 3.5/ 4.0 | ||||
| Total marks awarded (out of 40) | 36 | |||||||
| Notes: Definition of Criteria | ||||||||
| Criteria | Definition | |||||||
| Limited | Mostly incorrect named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and without justification for the use of the processes | |||||||
| Satisfactory | Some occurrence of incorrectly named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and with poor justification for the use of the processes | |||||||
| Clear | Correctly named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and with somewhat accurate justification for the use of the processes | |||||||
| Excellent | Correctly named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and with accurate justification for the use of the processes | |||||||
| None | Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes not discussed | |||||||
| Weak | Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes occasionally discussed | |||||||
| Moderate | Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes almost always discussed | |||||||
| Strong | Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes always discussed |
Ann 1283565
| PPMP 20009 Marking Rubric Assessment 1 (Individual Work - 40%) | 12083565 | |||||||
| Aalthough it was not a requirement, but your introduction gives a very clear idea about the event and you highlighted the challenges that may be faced during the Qatar2022 | ||||||||
| Attributes | Fail | Developing | Competent | Accomplished | Outstanding | Marks Awarded | Marker's comments | |
| 1a. Correct usage of processes for effective stakeholder management | • Process for stakeholder management not identified | n/a | • Weak identification and description of Stakeholder Management processes | n/a | • There is a clear identification and description of the stakeholder management processes which includes all the relevant information. • Gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | 3 | Very well done on identifying the stakeholders & their management as per the PMBOK. Clear identification & description of the SH mgmnt. | |
| Marks available (out of 3 marks) | 0 | 0.5 / 1.0 / 1.5 | 2.0 / 2.5 / 3.0 | |||||
| 1b. Correct identification of critical stakeholders | • Totally incorrect identification of stakeholders | n/a | Incomplete identification of stakeholders. Some stakeholders are identified but is difficult to read and does not relate | n/a | • Full list of stakeholder are identified and clearly described which includes all the relevant information. • Gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | 2.5 | Correct identification of the SH with well description of the SK involved. Yet not all the SK are included (i.e. media, officials including police and security). Yet have provided a detailed assessment matrix for the SK engagement showing good understanding | |
| Marks available (out of 3 marks) | 0 | 0.5 / 1.0 / 1.5 | 2.0 / 2.5 /3.0 | |||||
| 2. Ways or areas to implement lean project management | • Did not mention any best practices to implement lean project management • Did not describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Did not describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | • Identified ONE best practice to implement lean project management • Vaguely describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Did not describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | • Identified TWO best practice to implement lean project management • Satisfactorily describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | • Identified THREE best practice to implement lean project management • Clearly describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | • Identified more than THREE best practice to implement lean project management • Clearly describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. | 7.5 | Well done on identifying the areas of waste minimzation, You have mentioned more than 6 ares of waste minimization with more than THREE best practices to implement. The areas are very relevant and you tackled the waste resulted from each. I like the statistics about teh CO2 emission per capita in Qatar and how this event can contribute in a sustainable act. | |
| Marks available (out of 8 marks) | 0 | 0.5 / 1.0/ 1.5/ 2.0 | 2.5 / 3.0 / 3.5 / 4.0 | 4.5/ 5.0 / 5.5 / 6.0 | 6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5 / 8.0 | |||
| 3.Identify and elaborate processes from PMBOK,PRINCE2,OPM,Agile Practices and Lean Six Sigma (DMAIC Methodology) that could support your lean project implementation | ||||||||
| PMBOK (out of 6 marks) | • Level of understanding about selected PMBOK process activities for a lean approach | None | Limited | Satisfactory | Clear | Excellent | 5.5 | You have also showed outstanding level of understandingof PMBOK and strong and good linking between knowledge and processes as in procuremet management and project management plan. There is a very good examples on referring to cases from literature. The use of buses in teh case on low peeak time to be used for tours around the city! the compain for healthy style and how this was corrolated to the saving in energy is an excellent implication. |
| Marks available | 0 | 0.5 / 1.0 | 1.5 / 2.0 | 2.5 / 3.0 | 3.5 / 4.0 | |||
| • Linking to appropriate PMBOK knowledge area and process groups | None | None | Weak | Moderate | Strong | |||
| Marks available | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | |||
| PRINCE2 (out of 6 marks) | • Level of understanding about selected PRINCE2 processes for a lean approach | None | Limited | Satisfactory | Clear | Excellent | 5 | Same was noticed in understanding the PRINCE2 and the linkage of themes and principles. The examples of detailed risk identification and response. The listing of the potential risk and the identification of this gives an excellent level of understanding the PRINCE2 process and the link with lean management. You showed great interest in details as the LGBT and alkohol issue in Qatar which shows a good understanding of the social aspects and what are teh potential risk. You implied the theme of proper communication for effective risk management. However, there could be a more detailed reflection and link between the themes and principles based on PRINCE2 understanding |
| Marks available | 0 | 0.5 /1.0 | 1.5 /2.0 | 2.5 /3.0 | 3.5 - 4.0 | |||
| • Linking to appropriate PRINCE2 principle and themes | None | None | Weak | Moderate | Strong | |||
| Marks available | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | |||
| OPM (out of 2 marks) | Marks available | • Did not mention any of OPM attributes | n/a | • Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of OPM • Makes weak connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach | n/a | • Demonstrates excellent understanding of OPM • Makes strong connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach | 1.5 | The report demonestrate very good understanding of the OPM. You mentioned the purpose of OPM and linked this event as aproject to serve the strategy of Qatar to be well known destination. You also managed to give the example of organizing the food festival (although its not very relevant). Table (4) included good statistics about the audience, but was not used properly to reflect on the OPM!The report showed anexcellent understanding of OPM and its role in linking teh strategy with teh bussiness value |
| 0 | 0.5 /1.0 | 1.5 /2.0 | ||||||
| Agile Practices (out of 2 marks) | Marks available | • Did not mention any of Agile attributes | n/a | • Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of Agile • Makes weak connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach | n/a | • Demonstrates excellent understanding of Agile • Makes strong connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach | 2 | You used the lean in event planning and you have successfully presented a good understanding on how to implement lean management in working in stages with the example of prototype. |
| 0 | 0.5 /1.0 | 1.5 /2.0 | ||||||
| Lean Six Sigma (out of 6 marks) | • Level of understanding about DMAIC methodology for a lean approach | None | Limited | Satisfactory | Clear | Excellent | 5 | The example of managing tickitting thing and how to estimate the tickits' number in the planning phase shows excellent understanding of agile and lean management. You even moved beyond that while proposing the example of applying KANBAN. However, it may be better once you explained the six sigma as requested using DMAIC methodology with clear highlight on each stage. Yet, this is a good illustration |
| Marks available | 0 | 0.5 /1.0/1.5 | 2.0 /2.5 /3.0 | 3.5/ 4.0/ 4.5 | 5.0 /5.5 /6.0 | |||
| 4.Clarity of expression, grammar, spelling, final summary and correct APA style referencing (out of 4 marks) | Marks available | • The writing is difficult to follow, with incoherent or illogical arguments. • There are many errors of spelling or grammar. • Sections are unrelated. • No citations are included in the text of the essay, and there is no reference list at the end. | • The arguments make sense in places, but there are also illogical arguments, confusing sentences or sudden changes of topic. • There are numerous errors of spelling and grammar. • There is a reference list but it does not comply with APA refererencing style | • Most statements are clear but some require re-reading and guessing about meaning as they are not clear. • Sentence structure can be improved for simplicity, clarity and ease of comprehension. • Few grammar or spelling errors • APA referencing style is used with some format errors or inconsistencies. | • Statements are clear and well-connected. There is a logical flow of ideas. • Few spelling errors. • APA style is used almost perfectly with few errors or inconsistencies. | • Excellent clarity of expression at both the sentence and paragraph levels. • Well-structured with logical flow of ideas between paragraphs • Citations and References fully comply with APA style. | 4 | |
| 0 | 0.5 / 1.0 | 1.5 / 2.0 | 2.5 / 3.0 | 3.5/ 4.0 | ||||
| Total marks awarded (out of 40) | 36 | |||||||
| Notes: Definition of Criteria | ||||||||
| Criteria | Definition | |||||||
| Limited | Mostly incorrect named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and without justification for the use of the processes | |||||||
| Satisfactory | Some occurrence of incorrectly named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and with poor justification for the use of the processes | |||||||
| Clear | Correctly named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and with somewhat accurate justification for the use of the processes | |||||||
| Excellent | Correctly named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and with accurate justification for the use of the processes | |||||||
| None | Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes not discussed | |||||||
| Weak | Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes occasionally discussed | |||||||
| Moderate | Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes almost always discussed | |||||||
| Strong | Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes always discussed |
PPMP2014
| PPMP 20014 Marking Rubric DF II | ||||||||
| Attributes | Fail | Developing | Competent | Accomplished | Outstanding | Marks Awarded | Marker's comments | |
| Form the matrix for complexity assessment. This includes preparing a Table include the complexity factors as in the Week 3 lecture slides (45-48). It up to you to select the most relevant factors. | Less tha three factors used and there is no detailed explanation how the factors were assessed from (1 to 5) scale | Five factors were assessed, clearly explained and the peer assessment was well explained | Five factors were assessed, clearly explained and the peer assessment was well explained | SEVEN or more indicators are selected and their relevance to the CC was well explained to justify why these factors were most relevant from student's point view. There are more than TEN peers who did assess these factors in a scale of 1-5.. The Submission clearly says who are they and includes the student own input by commenting and critically analysing the peers' views based on the student' understanding to the case. He shows whether he agree or not with the assesment (that lead to the level of complexity of the CC) and Why he takes this position | 3 | |||
| Marks available (out of 3 marks) | 0.0/0.5 | 1.0/1.5 | 2.0/2.5 | 2.5/3.0 | ||||
| The submission includes the FOUR main Complexity types (structure, directional, temporal and technical) for the case of CC | No clear definition of the complexity types | Student has listed the Four types with Poor reflection and mapping to the CC issue | Student has Fair explanation of the Four complexity types but with out in-depth reflection on the CC. There is fair corrolatuion based on the CC issue but with limited details. Submission Does not include the evidences to support the explanation of the Four complexity types | NA | The Four aspects were listed with relevant explanation of what each aspect means in refernce to teh CC. In addition the four aspects are explained in detail through a reflection to the CC. There is a good understanding through using the examples of the case study to reinforce each type. | 2 | ||
| Marks available (out of 2 marks) | 0 | 0.5/1.0 | 1.0/1.25 | 1.5/2.0 | ||||
| Ashpy Law application to the case of CC | Nothing was introduced in regard | There is only one vriety that shows what is an external factors affecting and contributing to the CC complexity. | The submission shows three factors, event, policy, conflict of interest that adding more to the complexity of the climate change. There is a diagram similar to the diagram in the lecture slides (Ashby law) showing these events. There is no details how to mitigate these varieties | The submission has included more than THREE events contribute to teh complexity of the CC issue. This may include political factors, industrial factors, economical ones..that adding to the complexity of CC issue. It explains how these events make it more complex. It explains as well what can be done to mitigate these factors based on the student's understanding | 2 | |||
| Marks available (out of 2marks) | 0 | 0.50 | 0.75/1.0 | 1.5/2.0 | ||||
| Conclusion: The sub,ission includes the summary of the finding | no conclusion | Poor conclusion that does not reflect on the points above and does not clearly show the students' conclusion | Clear and concise conclusion summarising all the points and give a compelling desire to read | 1 | ||||
| Marks available (out of 1marks) | 0 | 0.50 | 1 | |||||
| Sum out of (8) | 8 | |||||||
