Developmental Analysis

profilesocialwrk2018
DevelopmentAnalysisPaperrubric.docx

Development Analysis Paper rubric - 50 pts

Unsatisfactory

Marginal

Proficient

Exemplary

APA & Writing Quality (8 Points)

One of the following are demonstrated; (1) paper includes cover page and references; (2) paper consistently and flawlessly follows guidelines and APA manual (6th ed.) for headings, spacing, in-text and reference list citations; (3) no spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent; (4) paper includes at least 2 references; (5) bio-psycho-social-spiritual assessment consistently follows assignment format and no sections are omitted; (6) content is included under the proper heading. (0 points)

Two of the following are demonstrated; (1) paper includes cover page and references; (2) paper consistently and flawlessly follows guidelines and APA manual (6th ed.) for headings, spacing, in-text and reference list citations; (3) no spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent; (4) paper includes at least 2 references; (5) bio-psycho-social-spiritual assessment consistently follows assignment format and no sections are omitted; (6) content is included under the proper heading. (1-3 points)

Four of the following are demonstrated; (1) paper includes cover page and references; (2) paper consistently and flawlessly follows guidelines and APA manual (6th ed.) for headings, spacing, in-text and reference list citations; (3) no spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent; (4) paper includes at least 4 references; (5) bio-psycho-social-spiritual assessment consistently follows assignment format and no sections are omitted; (6) content is included under the proper heading. (4-6 points)

All of the following are demonstrated in an exemplary way; (1) paper includes cover page and references; (2) paper consistently and flawlessly follows guidelines and APA manual (6th ed.) for headings, spacing, in-text and reference list citations; (3) no spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent; (4) paper includes at least 4 references; (5) bio-psycho-social-spiritual assessment consistently follows assignment format and no sections are omitted; (6) content is included under the proper heading. (7-8 points)

Biological Development (12 points)

None of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper: (1) completion of physical development tasks (2) significant illness/disease and (3) nutrition and exercise issues (0 points)

1 of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper: (1) completion of physical development tasks (2) significant illness/disease and (3) nutrition and exercise issues (1-6 points)

2 of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper: (1) completion of physical development tasks (2) significant illness/disease and (3) nutrition and exercise issues (7-10 points)

2-3 of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper in an exemplary way: (1) completion of physical development tasks (2) significant illness/disease and (3) nutrition and exercise issues (11-12 points)

Psychological development (14 points)

None of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper with reference to resources: (1) cognitive development (2) cultural development (3) emotional development (4) self-concept, self-esteem, and empowerment (5) significant life issues/events and diversity issues (0 points)

1-2 of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper with reference to resources: (1) cognitive development (2) cultural development (3) emotional development (4) self-concept, self-esteem, and empowerment (5) significant life issues/events and diversity issues (1-6 points)

3-4 of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper with reference to resources: (1) cognitive development (2) cultural development (3) emotional development (4) self-concept, self-esteem, and empowerment (5) significant life issues/events and diversity issues (7-11 points)

4-5 of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper with reference to resources in an exemplary way: (1) cognitive development (2) cultural development (3) emotional development (4) self-concept, self-esteem, and empowerment (5) significant life issues/events and diversity issues (12-14 points)

Psychosocial development Part 1 (8 points)

None of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper with reference to resources: (1) family environment (2) social Institutions (3) spirituality (4) community and social network. (0 points)

One of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper with reference to resources: (1) family environment (2) social Institutions (3) spirituality (4) community and social network. (1-3 points)

Two of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper with reference to resources: (1) family environment (2) social Institutions (3) spirituality (4) community and social network. (4-6 points)

Three of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper with reference to resources in an exemplary way: (1) family environment (2) social Institutions (3) spirituality (4) community and social network. (7-8 points)

Psychosocial development Part 2 (6 points)

None of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper with reference to resources: (5) discrimination/ oppression and economic factors (6) resilience (0 points)

One of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper with reference to resources: (5) discrimination/ oppression and economic factors (6) resilience (1-2 points)

Two of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper with reference to resources: (5) discrimination/ oppression and economic factors (6) resilience (3-5 points)

Two of the following are clearly and thoroughly addressed in the paper with reference to resources in an exemplary way: (5) discrimination/ oppression and economic factors (6) resilience (6 points)

Saint Leo Personal

Development

(2 points)

The core value of personal development was not included in the paper. (0 points)

The core value of personal development was either not described and/or it was simply mentioned rather than integrated into the paper. (1 point)

The core value of personal development was thoroughly described and logically integrated into the paper (1.75 points)

The core value of personal development was thoroughly described and logically integrated into the paper in an exemplary way. (2 points)