Competitive Strategy Tutorial Question help

HI6006 Online –Tutorial Questions Submission

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines

Trimester T2 2020

Unit Code HI6006

Unit Title Competitive Strategy

Assessment Type Individual

Assessment Title Tutorial Questions

Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping)

This assignment is designed to assess your level of knowledge of the key topics covered in this unit and application of strategy development and implementation theory to contemporary business cases. Maps to Unit Learning Outcomes 1,2,3,4.

Weight 50% of the total assessments

Total Marks 50

Word limit Between 1000 and 2000 words

Due Date Week 13 Tuesday, i.e. final cut-off 12 midnight on Tuesday 13 October. No exceptions. Penalties apply for late submissions.

Each student will be permitted only ONE submission to Blackboard. You need to ensure that the document submitted is the correct one.

Submission Guidelines

• All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.

• The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings and page numbers.

• If used, reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style.

HOLMES INSTITUTE

FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATION

HI6006 Online –Tutorial Questions Submission

Page 2 of 2

Purpose:

HI6006 - Tutorial Questions Submission Specifications

The purpose of the Tutorial Submission is to ensure that students have familiarised themselves with the Competitive Strategy lectures of weeks 2-11 and are able to apply the strategy models to the cases discussed in Tutorials of week 2-11. In the current Online Learning Environment this submission counts instead of a final exam

Details Write your answer to each of the tutorial questions specified as being assessed.

Plagiarism is a breach of academic integrity and may result in a grade of ZERO and a report of

Academic Misconduct.

Your final submission is due and the final cut-off is Tuesday of week 13, i.e. 13 October at 12 midnight. Each student will be permitted only ONE submission to Blackboard. You need to ensure that the document submitted is the correct one. The questions to be answered are;

Question 1- Week 2. Which elements of the General Environment are significant to the future of the German luxury car industry? - (7 marks) Question 2.- Week 4. Discuss how David Jones effectively build relationships with customers. - (7 marks) Question 3. - Week 8. Identify and discuss the 2 major environmental trends Walmart need to consider when entering the China market. - (7 marks) Question 4. - Week 9. What are the major competitive issues General Electric faces when managing cooperative strategies? - (7 marks) Question 5. - Week 7. Starbucks made important acquisitions in the past two decades what would be the 5 (five) most common challenges of a successful acquisition? - (11 marks) Question 6. - Week 11. Identify what you believe are the 5 (five) most important leadership responsibilities and how today’s business leader like Jack Ma develop the skills and charisma to be effective in the role? - (11 marks)

Assignment Structure

Standard Assignment Cover Page Heading: Tutorial Submission - Answers to Tutorial Questions of Weeks 2 – 11 Sub-Headings: Question 1- Week 2; Question 2.- Week 4; Question 3. - Week 8; Question 4. - Week 9; Question 5. - Week 7; Question 6. - Week 11 Answer each of the specified questions within 200 – 400 words. List of references: you MUST consult and reference academic articles and or (if applicable, i.e. reference the strategy models and/or lecture materials you use in your answers) to support your analysis. You must use Harvard Referencing

System.

Academic Integrity Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding Academic Integrity, as Academic Integrity is integral to

maintaining academic quality and the reputation of Holmes’ graduates. Accordingly, all assessment tasks need to

comply with academic integrity guidelines. Table 1 identifies the six categories of Academic Integrity breaches. If you

have any questions about Academic Integrity issues related to your assessment tasks, please consult your lecturer or

tutor for relevant referencing guidelines and support resources. Many of these resources can also be found through

the Study Skills link on Blackboard.

Academic Integrity breaches are a serious offence punishable by penalties that may range from deduction of marks,

failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course

enrolment.

Table 1: Six categories of Academic Integrity breaches

Plagiarism Reproducing the work of someone else without attribution. When

a student submits their own work on multiple occasions this is

known as self-plagiarism.

Collusion Working with one or more other individuals to complete an

assignment, in a way that is not authorised.

Copying Reproducing and submitting the work of another student, with or

without their knowledge. If a student fails to take reasonable

precautions to prevent their own original work from being copied,

this may also be considered an offence.

Impersonation Falsely presenting oneself, or engaging someone else to present as

oneself, in an in-person examination.

Contract cheating Contracting a third party to complete an assessment task,

generally in exchange for money or other manner of payment.

Data fabrication and

falsification

Manipulating or inventing data with the intent of supporting false

conclusions, including manipulating images.

Source: INQAAHE, 2020

If any words or ideas used the assignment submission do not represent your original words or ideas, you must cite all relevant sources and make clear the extent to which such sources were used. In addition, written assignments that are similar or identical to those of another student is also a violation of the Holmes Institute’s Academic Conduct and Integrity policy. The consequence for a violation of this policy can incur a range of penalties varying from a 50% penalty through suspension of enrolment. The penalty would be dependent on the extent of academic misconduct and your history of academic misconduct issues. All assessments will be automatically submitted to Self Assign to assess their originality. Further Information: For further information and additional learning resources please refer to your Discussion Board for the unit.