Week 4 final project lab

profileMonae_13
Descriptivestatisticreport.docx

Descriptive statistic report

Aailyah Council

Professor Steven Austin

March 1st,2021

Descriptive statistic report

sex

Frequency

Per cent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

female

36

50.0

50.0

50.0

male

36

50.0

50.0

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

From the analysis of the sample's distribution based on gender, the percentage level of the female is equal to that of a male at 50%. Meaning that in terms of gender, the sample is evenly distributed, having similar numbers. Out of 72 sample size, female constitute 36 while male constitute the same amount.

Ethnicity

Frequency

Per cent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

African American

23

31.9

31.9

31.9

Caucasian

31

43.1

43.1

75.0

Latino

14

19.4

19.4

94.4

Others

4

5.6

5.6

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

In terms of ethnicity, Caucasian leads with 31 translates to 43.1%, African American, with 23, which translates to 31.9%, Latino with 14, which translates to 19.4%. The minor ethnic group is represented by others which constitute four translating to 5.5%.

recal1

Frequency

Per cent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

.00

1

1.4

1.4

1.4

1.00

1

1.4

1.4

2.8

2.00

2

2.8

2.8

5.6

3.00

5

6.9

6.9

12.5

4.00

5

6.9

6.9

19.4

5.00

8

11.1

11.1

30.6

6.00

5

6.9

6.9

37.5

7.00

7

9.7

9.7

47.2

8.00

8

11.1

11.1

58.3

9.00

8

11.1

11.1

69.4

10.00

7

9.7

9.7

79.2

11.00

7

9.7

9.7

88.9

12.00

6

8.3

8.3

97.2

13.00

1

1.4

1.4

98.6

15.00

1

1.4

1.4

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

On the scale of rating recall, one of the highest ratings with most respondents includes 5.00, 8.00, and 9.00. They both constitute 11.1%.

Age

Frequency

Per cent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

18.00

2

2.8

2.8

2.8

19.00

6

8.3

8.3

11.1

20.00

4

5.6

5.6

16.7

21.00

4

5.6

5.6

22.2

22.00

6

8.3

8.3

30.6

23.00

4

5.6

5.6

36.1

24.00

8

11.1

11.1

47.2

25.00

4

5.6

5.6

52.8

26.00

2

2.8

2.8

55.6

27.00

4

5.6

5.6

61.1

28.00

2

2.8

2.8

63.9

29.00

2

2.8

2.8

66.7

31.00

2

2.8

2.8

69.4

32.00

4

5.6

5.6

75.0

33.00

2

2.8

2.8

77.8

35.00

2

2.8

2.8

80.6

36.00

4

5.6

5.6

86.1

37.00

2

2.8

2.8

88.9

39.00

2

2.8

2.8

91.7

42.00

2

2.8

2.8

94.4

45.00

2

2.8

2.8

97.2

49.00

2

2.8

2.8

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

From the distribution of age for the sample size, the highest percentage is 11.1% which constitute those that are aged 24 years. Therefore, age 24 is the mode value for the provided dataset.

The graph illustrates the relationship between age and recalls one for those involved In the experimental study. As age increases, the accuracy of identifying increases up to a certain level, where an increase in age results in a reduction in the level of remembering (Vann, Jacobson, Coyne‐Beasley, Asafu‐Adjei, & Szilagyi, 2018).

Reference

Vann, J. C. J., Jacobson, R. M., Coyne‐Beasley, T., Asafu‐Adjei, J. K., & Szilagyi, P. G. (2018). Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1).