revise

Describe how motivation and reinforcement would be used to influence members of the organization to resolve the issue. 20 %

Unacceptable

Needs Improvement

Competent

Exemplary

The description does not address how motivation and reinforcement would be used to influence members of the organization to resolve the issue. Examples are not provided

Partially describes how motivation and reinforcement would be used to influence members of the organization to resolve the issue. Makes loose connections between theory and solution. Examples do not fully support solution.

Satisfactorily describes how motivation and reinforcement would be used to influence members of the organization to resolve the issue. Makes logical connections between theory and solution. Examples support solution.

Fully describes how motivation and reinforcement would be used to influence members of the organization to resolve the issue. Draws compelling, logical connections between theory and solution. Examples are strong and support solution.

Explain how the core concepts of emotional intelligence would enhance the social skills and the decision-making efficacy of the management team. 20%

Unacceptable

Needs Improvement

Competent

Exemplary

The description does not explain how the core concepts of emotional intelligence would enhance the social skills and the decision-making efficacy of the management team.

Partially explains how core concepts of emotional intelligence would enhance the social skills and the decision-making efficacy of the management team. Loose connections are made to support the relationship between EI and management’s skills. Application of research is minimal.

Satisfactorily describes how motivation and reinforcement would be used to influence members of the organization to resolve the issue. Makes logical connections between theory and solution. Examples support solution.

Fully describes how motivation and reinforcement would be used to influence members of the organization to resolve the issue. Draws compelling, logical connections between theory and solution. Examples are strong and support solution.

Describe the core attributes of an effective team or strategies to develop team dynamics. 25 %

Unacceptable

Needs Improvement

Competent

Exemplary

Does not describe the core attributes of an effective team or strategies to develop team dynamics. Benefits to organization are not presented

Partially describes the core attributes of an effective team. Strategies to develop team dynamics lack details and source support or are not fully articulated. Benefits to the organization are unclear.

Satisfactorily describes the core attributes of an effective team. Strategies to develop team dynamics are articulated. Benefits to the organization are stated. Additional details and source support would improve the description.

Completely describes the core attributes of an effective team. Strategies to develop team dynamics are strongly articulated and detailed. Benefits to the organization are logical and well supported.

Create an effective reward system or determine strategies to motivate employees to influence behavior. 20 %

Unacceptable

Needs Improvement

Competent

Exemplary

Did not create an effective reward system or determine strategies to motivate employees to influence behavior.

Partially creates an effective reward system and articulates some motivational strategies. Supporting details are given but could be expanded to describe how behavior would be influenced. Application of research is minimal.

Creates an effective reward system and provides motivational strategies. Details and source material support how behavior would be influenced.

Creates an effective reward system and articulates wellthought out strategies to motivate employees to influence behavior. The connection between strategy and influence is strong and supported by source material.

Reference minimums; reference quality. 5 %

Unacceptable

No references provided or all references are poor-quality choices.

Needs Improvement Does not meet the required number of references; some references may be poor-quality choices

Competent

Meets the required number of references; some references may be poor-quality choices.

Exemplary Meets or exceeds the required number of references; all references are high-quality choices.

Follows writing standards; meets page minimums. 10 %

Unacceptable

Follows few to no writing standards. Does not meet page minimums.

Needs Improvement Follows few writing standards. May not meet page minimums.

Competent

Follows most writing standards. Meets page minimums.

Exemplary Follows all writing standards. Meets page minimums.