05796 -2 Pages Within 24hrs
DEONTOLOGY STUDY QUESTIONS ( not for turning in)
1. What is the difference between absolute duty and prima facie duty ?
2. What is the difference between deontologists and utilitarians?
3. What are Kant’s two formulations of the categorical imperative, and give examples of what he means when he says not to treat individuals as only means.
4. Do you agree with Kant’s belief that it is the ability to reason that makes humans morally special?
5. What are the situations in which Sisela Bok argues that it is okay to lie? Under what circumstances would you argue that it is right to lie? Why?
6. What is the veil of ignorance that John Rawls argues can be used for determining conditions of impartiality and what are the two principles of justice that he argues will come from those conditions of impartiality?
DEONTOLOGY STUDY QUESTIONS ( not for turning in)
1.
What is the difference between absolute duty and prima facie duty ?
2.
What is the difference between deontologists and utilitarians?
3.
What are Kant’s two formulations of the categorical imperative, and give
examples of what he means when he says not to treat individuals as only means.
4.
Do you agree with Kant’s belief that it is the ability to reason that makes humans
morally special?
5.
W
hat are the situations in which Sisela Bok argues that it is okay to lie? Under
what circumstances would you argue that it is right to lie? Why?
6.
What is the veil of ignorance that John Rawls argues can be used for determining
conditions of impartiality a
nd what are the two principles of justice that he argues
will come from those conditions of impartiality?
DEONTOLOGY STUDY QUESTIONS ( not for turning in)
1. What is the difference between absolute duty and prima facie duty ?
2. What is the difference between deontologists and utilitarians?
3. What are Kant’s two formulations of the categorical imperative, and give
examples of what he means when he says not to treat individuals as only means.
4. Do you agree with Kant’s belief that it is the ability to reason that makes humans
morally special?
5. What are the situations in which Sisela Bok argues that it is okay to lie? Under
what circumstances would you argue that it is right to lie? Why?
6. What is the veil of ignorance that John Rawls argues can be used for determining
conditions of impartiality and what are the two principles of justice that he argues
will come from those conditions of impartiality?