Defining and Evaluating E-Learning

Defining and Evaluating E-Learning

Write a 4–7 page paper in which you:

● Define e-Learning. ● Summarize at least five significant developments in e-Learning over the past 10 years. ● Evaluate at least three primary benefits of providing and offering high-quality online training,

courses, and programs to employees and learners in businesses, K–12 schools, or institutions of higher education.

● Analyze at least three primary reasons some businesses, K–12 schools, or institutions of higher education are hesitant or choose not to offer full online courses and programs.

● Predict the extent to which e-Learning will replace the traditional face-to-face learning in K–12 and higher educational settings.

● Recommend at least three ways technology will be needed to support and sustain the e-Learning process.

● Provide at least six academic references published within the last five years to support your paper.

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

● Evaluate the place of online learning in businesses, K–12 schools, or institutions of higher education.

MUST FOLLOW RUBRIC:

Unacceptable Needs Improvement

Competent Exemplary

Define e-Learning.

Points: 0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely defined e-Learning.

Points: 4.875 (3.75%) Partially defined e-Learning.

Points: 5.525 (4.25%) Satisfactorily defined e-Learning.

Points: 6.5 (5.00%) Thoroughly defined e-Learning.

Summarize at least five

significant developments in e-Learning over

the past 10 years.

Points: 0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely summarized at least five significant

Points: 24.375 (18.75%) Partially summarized at

Points: 27.625 (21.25%) Satisfactorily summarized at

Points: 32.5 (25.00%) Thoroughly summarized at least five significant developments in

developments in e-Learning over the past 10 years.

least five significant developments in e-Learning over the past 10 years.

least five significant developments in e-Learning over the past 10 years.

e-Learning over the past 10 years.

Evaluate at least three primary

benefits of providing and

offering high-quality

online training, courses, and programs to

employees and learners in

businesses, K–12 schools, or

institutions of higher education.

Points: 0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely evaluated at least three primary benefits of providing and offering high-quality online training, courses, and programs to employees and learners in businesses, K–12 schools, or institutions of higher education.

Points: 14.625 (11.25%) Partially evaluated at least three primary benefits of providing and offering high-quality online training, courses, and programs to employees and learners in businesses, K–12 schools, or institutions of higher education.

Points: 16.575 (12.75%) Satisfactorily evaluated at least three primary benefits of providing and offering high-quality online training, courses, and programs to employees and learners in businesses, K–12 schools, or institutions of higher education.

Points: 19.5 (15.00%) Thoroughly evaluated at least three primary benefits of providing and offering high-quality online training, courses, and programs to employees and learners in businesses, K–12 schools, or institutions of higher education.

Analyze at least three primary reasons why

some businesses, K–12 schools, or

institutions of higher education

are hesitant or choose not to

offer full online courses and programs.

Points: 0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely analyzed at least three primary reasons why some businesses, K–12 schools, or institutions of higher education are hesitant or choose not to offer full online courses and programs.

Points: 14.625 (11.25%) Partially analyzed at least three primary reasons why some businesses, K–12 schools, or institutions of higher education are hesitant or choose not to offer full online courses and programs.

Points: 16.575 (12.75%) Satisfactorily analyzed at least three primary reasons why some businesses, K–12 schools, or institutions of higher education are hesitant or choose not to offer full online courses and programs.

Points: 19.5 (15.00%) Thoroughly analyzed at least three primary reasons why some businesses, K–12 schools, or institutions of higher education are hesitant or choose not to offer full online courses and programs.

Predict the extent to which

e-Learning will replace the traditional

face-to-face learning in K–12

and higher

Points: 0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely predicted the extent to which e-Learning will replace the traditional

Points: 9.75 (7.50%) Partially predicted the extent to which e-Learning will replace the traditional face-to-face learning in K–12

Points: 11.05 (8.50%) Satisfactorily predicted the extent to which e-Learning will replace the traditional face-to-face

Points: 13 (10.00%) Thoroughly predicted the extent to which e-Learning will replace the traditional face-to-face

educational settings.

face-to-face learning in K–12 and higher educational settings.

and higher educational settings.

learning in K–12 and higher educational settings.

learning in K–12 and higher educational settings.

Recommend at least three ways

technology will be needed to

support and sustain the e-Learning process.

Points: 0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely recommended at least three ways technology will be needed to support and sustain the e-Learning process.

Points: 14.625 (11.25%) Partially recommended at least three ways technology will be needed to support and sustain the e-Learning process.

Points: 16.575 (12.75%) Satisfactorily recommended at least three ways technology will be needed to support and sustain the e-Learning process.

Points: 19.5 (15.00%) Thoroughly recommended at least three ways technology will be needed to support and sustain the e-Learning process.

Provide at least five academic

references published within the last five years to support your

paper.

Points: 0 (0.00%) No references provided.

Points: 4.875 (3.75%) Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references are poor-quality choices.

Points: 5.525 (4.25%) Meets the required number of references; all references are high-quality choices.

Points: 6.5 (5.00%) Exceeds the required number of references; all references are high-quality choices.

Clarity, writing mechanics, and

formatting requirements.

Points: 0 (0.00%) More than six errors present.

Points: 9.75 (7.50%) 5–6 errors present.

Points: 11.05 (8.50%) 3–4 errors present.

Points: 13 (10.00%) 0–2 errors present.