Decision-Making in Management

Criteria Ratings Points

Among the Given Techniques Compare 2 Decision-Making Techniques

20 to >14 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly compared 2 decision-making techniques

14 to >8 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily compared 2 decision-making techniques

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently compared 2 decision-making techniques

0 pts

Not Present

Did not provide 2 decision-making technique or compare them.

20 pts

Presented a problem to be solved using a decision making technique.

10 to >8 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly presented a problem to be solved using a decision making technique.

8 to >5 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily presented a problem to be solved using a decision making technique.

5 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently presented a problem to be solved using a decision making technique.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not present a problem to be solved using a decision making technique.

10 pts

Apply the decision-making technique to solve the problem in detail.

20 to >14 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly applied the decision-making technique to solve the problem in detail.

14 to >8 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily applied the decision-making technique to solve the problem in detail.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently applied the decision-making technique to solve the problem in detail.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not apply the technique.

20 pts

State what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making

5 to >3 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly stated what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily stated what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently stated what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not state what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making.

5 pts

Decision-Making Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Points

Abstract 5 to >3 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly articulated a clear and comprehensive overview of the paper’s content, linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and a biblical application are included.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily articulated some critical components of the paper, linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and a biblical application are included.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently articulated critical components of the paper linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and biblical application are not sufficient.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not present concepts clearly. Did not provide a comprehensive overview of the paper’s content. Missing a link to management. No focus on your findings. Missing key terms and a biblical application.

5 pts

Introduction 5 to >3 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is missing from your introduction section.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not present a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A thesis statement is missing from your introduction section.

5 pts

Conclusion 5 to >3 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not state the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

5 pts

Mechanics, Composition & Word Count

10 to >8 pts

Advanced

Mechanics, composition, and word count is thorough.

8 to >5 pts

Proficient

Mechanics, composition, and word count is satisfactory.

5 to >0 pts

Developing

Mechanics, composition, and word count is insufficient.

0 pts

Not Present

There are many errors in mechanics, composition, and word count.

10 pts

Decision-Making Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Points

APA Formatting 5 to >3 pts

Advanced

APA formatting is thorough.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

APA formatting is satisfactory.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

APA formatting is insufficient.

0 pts

Not Present

APA formatting does not exist.

5 pts

References 5 to >3 pts

Advanced

References meet requirements in number and quality.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

References almost meet requirements in number and quality.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

References do not meet requirements in number and quality.

0 pts

Not Present

Missing references

5 pts

Citations 10 to >8 pts

Advanced

All statements are supported by citations.

8 to >5 pts

Proficient

Many statements are supported by citations.

5 to >0 pts

Developing

Some statements are supported by citations.

0 pts

Not Present

Citations are rare, repetitious, or non-existent.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Decision-Making Grading Rubric