RESPONSE TO EACH TEAMS GCCM PLANS
Running head: DCA TEAM GCCM PLAN 1
DCA TEAM GCCM PLAN 2
DCA Team Group Communication and Conflict Management Plan
Christina Horning
John Kelly
Charise Moore
Ana Paddack
Jenny Wilson
PMAN 638
University of Maryland Global Campus
Document Revision Log
|
Version # |
Date of Issue |
Author (s) |
Description of Change |
|
0 |
1/21/2021 |
Christina Horning |
Created 1st Draft + Appendix A |
|
1 |
1/22/2021 |
Ana Paddack |
Added Revision Log, propose outline based on samples, added weekly readings 1 through 5 in Appendix A and added citations to reference page |
|
2 |
1/22/2021 |
Christina Horning |
Adjusted table format, selected readings 14-17 to summarize |
|
3 |
1/24/21 |
Christina Horning |
Alphabetized reference list. Input summaries 14-18. |
|
4 |
1/25/21 |
Jenny Wilson |
Added weekly readings 19-20 in Appendix A |
|
5 |
1/25/21 |
Charise Moore |
Added weekly readings 10-13. Added accompanying citations to the Reference page. |
|
6 |
1/25/21 |
John Kelly |
Added weekly readings 6-9. Updated reference page. |
|
7 |
1/26/21 |
Christina Horning |
Updated Table with Week 3 reading list
|
|
8 |
2/18/2021 |
Ana Paddack |
Added Group Motivation and Group Diversity Sections to the plan |
|
9 |
2/21/2021 |
Charise Moore |
Added the following: 1.Group Communications, Interpersonal Skills, and Technology 2. Group Cohesion |
|
10 |
2/21/2021 |
John Paul Kelly |
Added Group Leadership and Trust |
|
11 |
2/22/2021 |
Christina Horning |
Added Diversity portion and Effective Listening to the plan |
|
12 |
2/22/2021 |
Jenny Wilson |
Added Team Meetings/Assignments and Group Conflict and Decision Making sections. |
|
13 |
3/11/2021 |
Ana Paddack |
Added Negotiation section to the plan |
|
14 |
3/16/2021 |
John Kelly |
Team Conflict and Resolution Strategies |
|
15 |
3/16/2021 |
Charise Moore |
Added Argumentation, The Toulmin Model of Argumentation
|
Table of Contents II. DCA Group Communication and Conflict Management Plan 6 Purpose of Group Communication and Conflict Management 6 Mission Statement 6 Objectives 6 Foundations of Group Communications 6 Group diversity. 6 Diversity. 7 Recommendations. 8 Effective listening. 8 Recommendations. 10 Communication Management 10 Group leadership. 10 Group communications, interpersonal skills, and technology. 12 Group motivation. 14 Team meetings and team assignments. 19 Verbal and non-verbal communication. 20 Group cohesion. 21 Conflict Management Plan 23 Group conflict and decision making. 23 Conflict management styles. 24 Team conflict resolution strategies. 26 Argumentation, the Toulmin Model of argumentation. 27 Negotiation. 29 III. Implementation Assessment 31 IV. References 32 V. Appendix A: Weekly GCCM Assignment Table 40
II. DCA Group Communication and Conflict Management Plan
Purpose of Group Communication and Conflict Management
Mission S
We are a diverse team of students and professionals from various generational, gender and cultural backgrounds, working from different geographic locations committed to transparent communication and collaboration, critical listening, and team spirit to effectively create a complete communications and conflict management plan by the end of the class and future projects.
Objectives
Foundations of Group ommunications
Group diversity.
Some cultures, such as the United States and Japan, focus on work and prioritize time over culture. In contrast, European cultures such as Italy value living in the moment. Similar cultures focus on experiencing the joys of interactions, nature, and life. How long something takes is of little consequence to a person who focuses on enjoying the moment. (Lavine, 2021). Under this project the team is determined to meet middle ground, operating under US standards to complete assigned deadlines on time but also allowing ourselves time to enjoy life. Most of the tasks completed by the team are completed asynchronized therefore, as a team we are less vulnerable to the co-culture theory that impacts communication among minorities and those in subcultures (Orbe, 2009).
Our group is composed of four females and one male team member. We acknowledge that our gender composition will affect our decisions and influence our performance. It will also influence our listening skills. Generally, women are better listeners than men. Men are task-focused and hear in terms of goals and current tasks. In contrast, women listen for emotion, content, and delivery (Roebuck et al. 2015). Our individual cultures will also play a large role in what we choose to listen to during conversations and team meetings. For this reason, the team will rely on detailed meeting minutes for a clear account of individual and group tasks, deadlines and assignment of roles and responsibilities. Research has shown that the most generous groups consist of two men and one woman and that groups that are majority women are more equalitarian (Roebuck et al. 2015 p.79). The age diversity of our team will also be a contributor to improved performance, quality, and effectiveness. We plan to share professional and personal experiences to reach positive outcomes and avoid groupthink. We took into consideration the study on age diversity and team outcomes performed by Schneid, Isidor, Steinmetz, and Kabst (2016) which examined age diversity’s function or relationship to overall team performance, group creativity, efficacy, team satisfaction, financial results, and team member retention. The research team found inconclusive results pertaining to age diversity and performance in most factors they reviewed.
Diversity.
Diversity education and training are vital due to the global nature of our world and businesses. Understanding of multicultural norms and values is essential for effective communication while avoiding unnecessary conflict. Orbe (2009) described co-culture theory and its focus on the ways in which culture and power impact communication, specifically for minorities or those in subcultures. Subcultures are groups composed of women, disabled, LBGTQ, lower economic status, first-generation college students, immigrants, international students. Co-culture theory encompasses five assumptions- that a hierarchy of power exists, that dominant group members occupy the most powerful positions, power of the dominant group impacts non-dominant groups, and that differences and similarities exist between co-culture groups. (Orbe, 2009). Co-culture highlights the importance of monitoring communication to ensure open and free dialogue exists.Diversity in teams could be implicative of good team dynamics ((Apesteguia, Azmat, & Iriberri, 2012, p. 93).
Recommendations.
A pillar of our team communication plan will be the inclusion of a diversity statement
that highlights the importance of diversity to our team.
Our diverse experiences position us to create better solutions for our clients. We value diversity in all forms; our people are our greatest resource and it is through diversity that we are strong. We are passionate and intentionally embrace multiple perspectives to foster an inclusive workplace. We welcome team members to bring their authentic, holistic selves to work and push us forward every day.
-Our team believes co-culture theory should be part of the plan because we need to recognize the impact dominant group members have on subcultures.
- To have effective communication, we must create an environment where everyone is comfortable.
Effective listening.
In teamwork, team members participate in dialogue for the purpose of creating. Effective team dialogue is shared and requires neutral receptiveness to other’s ideas to build a common idea designed and maintained by the power of collective listening and collective spirit. As Levine stated: “Wisdom, insight, change and action don’t come from better thinking, testing and strategizing but from letting go, receiving and listening” (Levine, 1994, p.94).
Active listening is a best practice both in business and interpersonal relationships, however, it is frequently overlooked. Listeners must account for cultural differences while listening. Generally, women are better listeners than menen are task-focused and hear terms of goals and current tasks. In contrast, women listen for emotion, content, and delivery. Managers also listen better than non-managers. As one's responsibility increases, so do their listening skills. (Roebuck, Bell, Raina, & Lee, 2015). By understanding what different genders, cultures, and levels of responsibility look for, we can focus our information for maximum effectiveness.
According to Kelly (2021), poor listening can be attributed to a lack of formal training. Unpracticed listening skills deteriorate over time and we all have listening barriers (Kelly, 2021, p. 5). Kelly believes improving listening skills requires being fully present, use body language to confirm engagement, listening with the heart, discerning mixed or unspoken messages, and refraining from interrupting the other person, as well as possibly take notes to obtain clarity once the speaker has stopped (Kelly, 2021, p.5). We must focus on intentional listening.
Active or intentional listening according to Ungvarsky is a learned skill that is required for successful relationships both business and personal. To listen properly, one must pay attention and listen without planning their response while listening (Ungvarsky, 2020). Specifically, sustained focus, consistent eye contact, affirmative responses, and nonjudgmental listening. After the speaker is done relaying their message, the active listener can then request clarification where required and repeat back the message to the speaker as they understand it. Active listening is a critical skill both professionally and personally. As it pertains to project teams and communication planning in general, teams should review the steps of active listening.
Traditionally, note taking during meetings has been viewed as a menial task. Volkema and Avery suggest a more deliberate approach as they believe the role takes time, effort, stellar listening skills, and the ability to interact with the group and facilitator to ensure that information is captured accurately and precisely. By understanding and appreciating the role of the recorder and facilitator, decision making groups can give their meetings more direction and their participants more opportunities for involvement (Volkema & Avery, 1988, p.48).
Recommendations.
· Our team will emphasize the significance of the active recorder and facilitator roles to increase meeting productivity. We have created a schedule to allow for adequate preparation considering the importance of these roles.
· Facilitator role will be taken seriously and will focus on making sure everyone’s voice is heard in the team meetings
· Team will strive for positive group dynamic to ensure everyone is encouraged to share their thoughts
· Team members agree to practice active listening and to wait until the speaker is done before responding. If unsure of the message or simply to clarify, the receiver can repeat the message as they understood it back to the speaker.
Communication Management
Group leadership.
Group leadership involves guiding, motivating, and directing a team (Project Management Institute, 2017, pg 60). Leadership is essential to success; however, that is not guaranteed. The leader must create an environment where all members feel comfortable expressing ideas and debating. A primary function of group leadership is dealing with people. Leaders use their leadership qualities to work with stakeholders, sponsors, project teammates, and anyone else associated with the project. The traits of a leader include but are not limited to:
· Being a visionary
· Optimism and positivity
· Being collaborative
· Managing relationships and conflict
· Communicating
· Respect
· Giving credit
· Continuous learning
· Critical thinker
· A holistic and systemic view (Project Management Institute, 2017, pg 60-61).
Leadership is classified into several different styles. The styles range from the hands-off laissez-faire style to the committed servant leader, which leadership style a person utilizes depends on the individual's personality/traits and the team's make. For example, a charismatic leader inspires those around them through high-energy, enthusiasm, and self-confidence. A person who lacks those traits would not be the best charismatic leader. Bruce Fairchild Barton stated, "It is said that great leaders are born, not made. The saying is true to this degree, that no man can persuade people to do what he wants them to do, unless he genuinely likes people, and believes that what he wants them to do is to their own advantage (1925)." His statement is true today as it was almost one hundred years ago some great leaders are born to lead, such as General Patton. However, it is possible to learn how to lead effectively. As Fairchild stated, if a person believes in their work, they can also become a leader. The key is understanding yourself, the team, and the project goals. A leader does not need all the qualities of a leader; they only need to know how to use their skills best and get the best out of their people.
In our group project, we utilize a type of interactional leadership on a fixed rotation. Our group decides to break the project down into twelve weeks, where one member leads for a week and moves onto the next person. Interactional leadership combines a combination of traits from transactional, transformational, and charismatic leadership. As a group, we all possess different leadership skills, and the interactional leadership style allows every member to lead in their way. Our team does an excellent job at collaborating on assignments, respecting each other, offering productive feedback, and increasing trust every week. A traditional project has one leader, but our method gives every member a chance to influence the project. By sharing leadership responsibilities, we increase personal ownership of the project and evenly distribute the workload. Additionally, this leadership method highlights individual strengths, which led to a more targeted allocation of project tasks. While our style is not traditional, it is an effective method for this group and brings out the best in all members.
Group communications, interpersonal skills, and technology.
Group communications, interpersonal skills, and technology are all key contributing components that will determine how well the group will stay abreast of changes to the project. The goal of communication is to convey a message that is clear and easily understood. There are challenges that can occur at various stages during the pursuit to communicate. This can result from differing expectations and perceptions, lack of basic language skills, distractions, and /or selectivity (2007, p.198). Effective group communication begins with strong interpersonal skills such as active listening, teamwork, leadership, and dependability by navigating complexities and day-to-day tasks within the project. Technology provides a variety of tools necessary to exchange information that is needed to bring awareness, address questions and concerns, and maintain an open channel of communication. To ensure the group is fully engaged, utilizing available tools , and collaborating effectively to support the project the following plan has been established:
Table 1
Communication whether written, verbal, nonverbal, visual, oral, or electronic has a significant impact on the way business is conducted (2007, p.198). This plan establishes that the group members have created a dynamic that supports the bottom line for success throughout the duration of the project. Completing tasks on time signifies that the various channels of communication and interpersonal skills that the team encompasses has created an environment that is conducive to meeting desired outcomes.
Group motivation.
Motivation is a key factor for high performance for the DCA team. Group motivation requires the right combination of challenges, opportunities, feedback, and recognition of hard work to ensure team members remain motivated and engaged throughout the completion of the project. The following plan was created to nurture group motivation:
|
Always keep open communication |
If any team member has doubts about a weekly or daily assignment, the team member needs to communicate immediately with the group via group text or email. The group will thoroughly discuss group assignments and assign roles and responsibilities during a recurring weekly meeting. |
|
Creating team building opportunities |
When possible, team members will share personal experiences and find a common topic to relate outside of group task related activities. Suggested topics include using weather as an icebreaker. One team member lives in Alaska and always has interesting weather facts to share while other team members are in the East coast and relate to the same weather conditions.
|
|
Developing Trust |
The team will develop trust with one another by remaining committed to meeting internal deadlines for assigned work, which will allow sufficient time for review of documents before team submissions and will minimize stress because of work completed last minute. As a team we trust we will all have the ability needed to complete group assignments. If a team member needs additional resources or information, he/she will reach out to the wider team for support right away. For the completion of the project, the team acknowledges that the main extrinsic motivator is finishing the class with a passing grade. The team aims for an A as a motivator to achieve good performance. The team endorses intrinsic rewards highlighted by Thomas and before each team meeting and end of week assignment the team will: · Commit to a meaningful purpose · Choose the best way of fulfilling that purpose · Make sure that one is performing work activities competently, and · Make sure that one is making progress to achieving the team’s goal (Thomas 2009). By practicing these principles, the team will operate under a strong trust system.
|
|
Managing and constructively solving conflict |
The team has developed a conflict and escalation plan described in page (xxx) to support conflict resolution. When faced with conflict, team members will always act with the utmost respect and professionalism to foster constructive and not destructive behaviors and outcomes.
|
Motivation and Motivation Theory
Maslow’s Hierarchical Theory
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs states that human beings have needs that are hierarchically ranked. Once lower-level needs are satisfied these no longer serve as motivators. Physiological, safety, social, esteem and self-actualization are among Maslow’s hierarchically organized needs (Gawel 1997). Our team finds self-actualization, which represents the drive to reach full personal potential as the most salient cause of individual and team motivation.
ERG Theory
Clayton Paul Alderfer proposes that basic human needs are grouped under existence, relatedness, and growth categories (Motivating Employees Chapter14). After an assessment of the team needs it was concluded that the team has satisfied its existence needs by having access to air, food, water, and shelter. During the 2020-2021 pandemic the team strives to maintain safety-related needs as these relate to health and secure employment. In terms of relatedness, during the current pandemic the team acknowledges the importance of maintaining interpersonal relations with friends, family, and significant others. Growth and the desire for personal development and the gain of new skills is the main motivator for the team.
Two-factor Theory
Herzberg distinguished “hygiene factors” or factors related to job dissatisfaction and “motivators” or factors related to job satisfaction as main forces to motivate people in the workplace (Herzberg & Snyderman,1959). According to equity theory, employees are demotivated when they view reward distribution as unfair or find their personal values not in line with company policy or levels of supervision, interpersonal relations, working conditions and compensation (Motivating Employees Chapter14). The motivators that team DCA plans to put into practice to reduce dissatisfiers include:
· work hard as a group to achieve the SMART goals of the project and foster a high-performance environment
· Recognize each other’s work, contributions, and accomplishments
· Assign equal workload to all team members and allow team members the opportunity to enhance their group participation as desired.
· Team members are rotating meeting facilitators, note taking, editor responsibilities to nurture skill variety, task significance, autonomy and aim to provide constructive feedback to each other twice during the semester.
As a diverse team we acknowledge that our individual needs are culturally based. Some of us will practice expectancy theories choosing behaviors that may lead to expected outcomes, other might opt for equity theories comparing individual work and rewards to others, goal setting theory using our SMART goals as the main motivator and reinforcement theory by staying motivated through good grades and interactions with classmates and the professor (Motivation and Motivation Theory 2009).
Team meetings and team assignments.
Given teams are formed to unite a group of individuals around mutual goals and projects, the degree of organization and structure the team maintains is critical to its success. To empower each member, self-managed teams do well to implement organization and structure by distributing elements of their maintenance to all team members (Managing Groups and Teams, 2012). Additionally, interdependencies demand that organization and structure within the team facilitate effective communication. The DCA team has subscribed to these underlying concepts in their management of team meetings and assignments. The application of these concepts formed the following plan:
· Meeting logistics: The team agreed on a weekly meeting date and time. A recurring calendar invite via the Google Meet teleconference platform was created, establishing the meeting as a fixed point of coordination for the team.
· Meeting assignments: The team formed a facilitator and meeting minutes rotation schedule that clearly assigns a meeting for each team member to facilitate the meeting and another to record the meeting minutes. The facilitator creates the agenda for the meeting ahead of the meeting time and posts to the team’s Google drive and Group Locker. The meeting minutes taker records the minutes from the meetings discussion and posts them to the team’s Google drive and Group Locker.
· Meeting agenda and facilitation: Each meeting has a defined agenda, which is available ahead of the meeting. During the meeting, the designated facilitator is responsible for ensuring all agenda topics are adequately covered. When needed, the facilitator also serves to ensure the team arrives at a consensus in which all members have spoken.
· Meeting minutes and follow-up: The designated meeting minutes taker captures the action items for the week and the corresponding person responsible is recorded as well. After the meeting, the team communicates through group texting on their progress throughout the week.
· Weekly deliverables and assignments: The DCA team discusses weekly deliverables at each meeting. Team members volunteer for most of the tasks, and any remaining tasks are evenly distributed among the team. While deliverables vary from week to week, the team has an ongoing project of capturing weekly reading summaries. Each team member selects two to three readings a week to summarize and reference.
The plan outlined above is heavily supplemented by the DCA team’s communication through group texting. The weekly meeting provides the team a time to plan and distribute tasks, but ongoing communication is vital to ensure the team is effectively coordinating as members execute their assignments. These methods have proven effective in supporting teamwork and ensuring deliverables are completed in a timely manner.
Verbal and non-verbal communication.
Trust is an absolute necessity in project management. Trust is assured reliance on someone or a group's character, ability, strength, or truth (Trust, n.d.). Without trust, a team's output would never reach its full potential (Decker, 2015). Trust can affect the speed and cost of projects. As trust diminishes, so does the rate of the project, which increases the cost. The speed and cost changes occur because team members speed time checking other members' work instead of focusing on their own. Additional scrutiny from other teammates may also lead to conflict. Trust is something that takes a long time to build but erodes rapidly. Factors of trust in teams include:
· Accepting responsibility for actions
· Embrace accountability
· Productive conflicts (generate new ideas).
· Openness to risk
· Eagerness and energy (2015).
In groups without trust, you see bickering, withholding of information, reluctance to ask for help, conflict, and lack of engagement. The characteristics of groups that lack faith all decrease productivity and hurt group dynamics.
In groups that lack trust or newly formed groups, trust-building behaviors/activities can help bring members together. To build trust, treat everyone as equals, be consistent, admit fault, communicate, ask for help, and show you care. As stated, trust takes a long time to build and a very short time to lose.
Group cohesion.
Group Cohesiveness refers to the interpersonal dynamics that exist among group members (Parks, 2004). Specifically, it describes how the group relates, interacts, and makes decisions collectively to reach a goal. There are several routes that may be taken to maintain and enhance cohesion throughout the project between group members. Besides minimizing turnover, such strategies as reducing the size of the group, emphasizing a common goal, and reducing perceived differences in member status can all improve cohesion (Parks, 2004). It is evitable that differences may arise that could potentially affect the cohesion of the group as well as the success of the project. Group members emphasize different aspects of these factors, explaining why some people will be happy within a group where a particular factor may be undesirable to others (Parks, 2004). To ensure that the group remains cohesive and/or has a contingency plan to support any differences the following plan will be implemented:
|
Cohesive Attributes |
Details |
|
Mission |
Establish the groups purpose and end goal. |
|
Acknowledge diversity |
Take into consideration the group members differences in culture, personalities, geographical location, language, ethnicity, morals, social roles, sex, and education. This varies across the team and must be considered throughout all phases of the project. |
|
Allow everyone to play an active role |
Each group member will be assigned specific tasks throughout the duration of the project. To keep the playing field fair, meeting and note taking responsibilities will alternate each week. Additionally, weekly summaries will be a shared responsibility among all group members. |
|
Build trust |
Establish a positive relationship by setting expectations and adhering to them. |
|
Set goals |
The group will identify clear, concise realistic goals and stay aligned with them throughout the project. |
|
Ask for feedback |
During each team meeting feedback will be requested from each group member to maintain an inclusive effort. |
|
Communicate |
Group members will maintain ongoing communication through various technological methods for the duration of the project. |
|
Plan fun activities (Ice breakers, etc.) |
Start of meetings and texts with small talk and/or light conversation. Possibly, discuss a movie you watched or something funny that one of your family members did before jumping into project business. |
|
Experience |
Professional, educational, and life experiences will be considered in assigning deliverables. |
Conflict Management Plan
Group conflict and decision making.
Within groups, conflict is inevitable as procedural and substantive agreement can be difficult to accomplish with multiple opinions and views. However, conflict must be addressed in its nascent stages before it escalates or becomes interpersonal. There are numerous techniques to manage conflict within groups, but the DCA team finds the Five A’s technique to be the most comprehensive method to addressing conflict (Conflict Management and Negotiation, 2009). This technique employs the following steps:
Assessing the problem: The team members involved gather information about the problem and decide what is the heart of the problem.
· Acknowledging the other party: The team members involved in the conflict listen to each other’s side of the problem.
Attitude toward the other party: The team members set aside their bias regarding the other party’s communication style to enter the conversation with a neutral perspective.
· Actioning the conflict resolution process: After selecting a method for resolving the conflict, team members execute the method. However, they must remain aware of their behaviors and continue assessing the other party.
· Analyzing the agreement: This step involves the team members reviewing what has been agreed and ensuring all parties have met the requirements.
While conflict management techniques require impartiality and objectivity to be effectively implemented, decision making methods should be founded in rationale. The DCA team follows the rational model of decision making, which incorporates the following principles:
Considering the decision being presented or identifying the problem.
Outlining and evaluating potential courses of action. This should include carefully considering implications of selecting one course of action over another.
Selecting a course of action which poses the best outcomes based on careful evaluation against alternatives.
Conflict management styles.
Understanding team members conflict management styles as well as the pros and cons of each will benefit the group decision making process. This knowledge will allow individuals to face conflict as it occurs because it is a simple fact of group work and increasing conflict management skills will enhance conflict management response. Thomas-Kilmann’s Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) is a theory commonly recognized by authorities defines five main styles of conflict management: collaborating, competing, avoiding, accommodating, and compromising (Benoliel, 2017).
Benoliel elaborated on the five main styles of conflict management in the dual concern model. Collaborating style of conflict management combines assertiveness and cooperation. This style utilizes collaboration to reach a solution that meets the needs of everyone. The collaborating style is valuable because its benefits both sides with minimal loss on either side. Dr. Benoliel declares that this choice of conflict management style is best-suited when both the outcome and the long-term relationship between members is important (Benoliel, 2017). Competing style of conflict management is less cooperative and more aggressive. Individuals who choose this style are more interested in their own side or concerns and less about the group as a unit. This style is often chosen when there are no ongoing relationship requirements, and the outcome of the decision-making is what is most important.
Avoiding style is utilized by individuals who do not welcome are unassertive, and while not as blatant as other styles, are uncooperative with the group. The lack of cooperation is shown by avoiding the issue or avoiding the decision making to avoid feeling discomfort. This style of conflict management is chosen when a conflict needs to be avoided or when the outcome is unimportant. Accommodating style is the exact opposite of the competing style, there is an aspect of unselfishness when accommodating to appease the other person. This style seems positive; however, its one-sidedness is not advantageous to the side doing the accommodating and this can cause bitterness. This conflict management style is reserved for when the outcome is unimportant or when the relationship is more important. Compromising style is a conflict management style where the goal is to find a mutually agreed upon solution to the conflict while maintaining the relationship. This style is also assertive but in a positive way. The compromising style of conflict management is used when experience is required but compromise is possible to reach the mutual goal. This involves a mutual give and take (Benoliel, 2017).
Choi (2013) found that the dominant role in conflict-management culture is exemplified by overt public confrontation as the standard strategy for conflict management making individuals utilizing competitive styles of conflict management applicable in that environment. However, when cooperation is the typical behavior strategy for the environment, collaborative conflict management style is the appropriate choice because that is the expected behavior. When group coherence is the priority, withdrawal, or avoidant conflict management is fitting within that environment. Ultimately, Choi’s research in the US and Korea indicated that job satisfaction was positively correlated with collaborative conflict management styles and negatively correlated with dominant conflict management styles (Choi, 2013).
Team conflict resolution strategies.
When working in teams, conflict is inevitable; it is essential to remember that not all conflict is negative. Productive conflict provides opportunities for team members to learn and sparks innovation. As project managers, we must create an environment that encourages and maintains the positive and constructive aspects of conflict (Van Slyke, 2000). A productive work area is where all members feel comfortable expressing themself and providing constructive feedback to each other. The project managers' responsibilities regarding conflict include identifying and understanding the positive and negative values of conflict and managing its impact on team performance and project success (Villax & Anatatmula (2010). The project manager must recognize the type of conflict occurring. For example, a personal conflict requires a different management technique compared to a technical disagreement. Personal conflicts have devastating effects and long-term effects on interpersonal relationships. Emotional conflict is challenging to resolve and causes significant impact on the project. Technical conflicts are less damaging and have a more significant potential to spark new ideas.
To effectively manage group disputes, the project manager must be aware of the ongoing situation and understand each side's position. The project manager uses the information to prepare for conflict resolution. During the preparation phase, remember to confront problems and not people. If you confront individuals, they might feel attacked and shut down, which destroys the open environment you want (Sears, 1980). Once they know the details of the disagreement can facilitate solutions. Then the PM can bring the two parties together to discuss possible solutions. During this time, it is important to remind both parties of the project's goals and priorities, that they are on the same team, and respect each other, especially if the conflict is personal. Once the dialog starts, push both parties towards collaboration or combine ideas to create a win-win situation. Group collaboration aims to create a situation where both sides do not compete against each other but work together. If a combined solution is not possible, have each side explain their positions and the benefits of implementing their proposed solution. After all, parties state their positions, allow everyone to ask questions for clarification, and finally vote to reach a consensus on the way forward. Reaching an agreement is another conflict resolution technique where the group majority decides the outcomes for team conflict. No matter which method is used to manage conflict, remember to keep team members respectful, remind them of the goals, and strive for the best solutions.
In our group, we are very fortunate and have not experienced negative group conflict. We rotate leadership every week, which gives each member opportunities to lead and follow effectively. Furthermore, we have open discussions during our weekly meetings and via text messaging, as necessary. We discuss all group decisions and vote on each solution. We have no doubt that our team would be able to effectively and quickly deal with group conflict should conflict arise before the end of the class to reach our team's goals.
Argumentation, the Toulmin Model of argumentation.
Stephen E. Toulmin developed the Toulmin argument. The Toulmin method is a style of argumentation that breaks arguments down into six parts: claim, grounds, warrant, qualifier, rebuttal, and backing (Toulmin Argument, n.d.).This method encourages fact-based arguments between parties. Because of the specificity of the Toulmin method, it also helps to identify gaps in an argument. A disagreement will inevitably occur in a group setting. A diverse group of individuals will bring differing personalities, morals, and opinions that could potentially lead to conflict within the group. The source of the argument, the method used to resolve it, and the end goal creates an effective environment. Our team must focus on the following components listed in Table 3 to encourage open dialogue with clear and supported factual statements.
|
Claim |
An assertion must be presented to potentially influence the other group members or cause them to seek further proof. |
|
Gounds |
The initiator must provide evidence to support the assertion and/or claim made to the group.
|
|
Warrant |
The initiator must establish that the assertion/claim is correct based on a known assumption. |
|
Qualifier |
The initiator must acknowledge that in some instances, the assertion may not be true. |
|
Rebuttal |
Acknowledgment of an alternate position is expressed to the group. |
|
Backing |
The initiator must provide additional support of the original argument to prove their position and provide one last path to persuasion. |
Table 3
Group conflict is unavoidable. How the team overcomes those challenges is the contributing factor to the success of the group. Toulmin’s method to break down arguments into segments that help analyze a claim at a granular level that +encourages critical thinking and open-ended dialogue to establish one’s point of view and persuade others while working towards a resolution. As a team we will acknowledge that our view is not always true, and providing multiple views of the situation, can build an image of a careful and unbiased thinker (Toulmin Argument, n.d.).
Negotiation.
Negotiation is a social interaction involving two or more individuals or groups in pursuit of a joint agreement involving differing needs or ideas. A negotiation aims at some tangible or intangible exchange or promise being made by the negotiators. Our team is a cross-cultural team. Hence, when negotiating, the team must be sensitive to differences in cultural viewpoints, environments, communication styles, political systems, ideologies, and traditions.Consequently, the team has decided to avoid the subject of politics and ideologies during interactions and attempted to focus negotiations on reaching team deliverables for the week and class. Negotiation types can be divided into three broad categories, namely Day-to-Day or Managerial Negotiation, Commercial Negotiation, and Legal Negotiation. In addition, two negotiating parties can adopt either a distributive or integrative type of negotiation. (Sarkar, 2010).
Distributive bargaining implies the old adage ‘Play your cards close to your chest - Give little or no information to the other side’ (Sarkar, 2010).On the other hand, integrative bargaining implies cooperation and the joining of forces to achieve something together. This type of negotiation involves a higher degree of trust and sustained relationship. In the case of our team, we elected to maintain collaborative negotiation. On our team, there will not be winners or losers. We plan to end this class and our studies feeling that we all have thrived. Additionally, as individuals, we will try to address ethnocentric views to mitigate conflict sensitively.
Hofstede’s Principles:
It is very imperative to understand the complexity of cross-cultural complexity. It helps to keep in mind that cultures worldwide share four common characteristics: culture is shared, it is learned, it is based on symbols, and it is integrated. This integration is accomplished through the shared experiences of language and literature, art, music, religion, food and money. In order to keep the culture functional, all aspects of the culture must be integrated (Sarkar, 2010).
During the negotiation stage, our team plans to remain vigilant of the following:
Overconfidence bias:
Overconfidence bias occurs when an individual overestimates their ability to predict future events” (Faulty Decision Making, n.d.). Our team will control this bias by not submitting team deliverables without collectively and thoroughly proofreading deliverables before submission.
Hindsight bias:
Hindsight bias occurs when looking backward in time and mistakes seem obvious after they have already occurred, (Faulty Decision Making, n.d.). For example, if, after submitting a deliverable, one of our team members expresses that he/she knew the APA formatting in a group paper was incorrect before submission. This observation would be viewed as unproductive.
Anchoring:
Anchoring occurs when someone makes decisions based on one piece of information (Faulty Decision Making, n.d.). For example, if our team receives feedback on a team assignment, it may be a bit myopic to focus only on that feedback without seeing the bigger picture and understanding its context.
Framing bias:
Framing bias occurs when a team makes a decision based on perception versus facts. Our team plans to avoid this framing bias by avoiding stereotyping.
Escalation of commitment:
When individuals continue on a failing course of action after information reveals it may be a poor path to follow, it demonstrates an inability to acknowledge potential problems, (Faulty Decision Making, n.d.). In our team’s case, we will try to avoid this condition by assessing when project drafts can be easily edited to reach the professor‘s standards, and on when we would need to reevaluate our strategy and start from scratch to adhere to applicable rubrics.
As a team during negotiations, empathy is key. We plan to listen to the other sides' resistance points and take an empathetic approach before exerting our own influences and -their perceived values. We feel that with this approach, the best possible outcomes will emerge.
III. Implementation Assessment
IV. References
Apesteguia Jose, Azmat Ghazala, & Iriberri Nagore. (2012). The Impact of Gender Composition on Team Performance and Decision Making: Evidence from the Field. Management Science, 58(1), 78–93. https://doi-org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1348.
Ayman, R., & Hartman, E. (2004). Situational and contingency approaches to leadership. In G. R. GoethalsG. J. Sorenson, & J. M. Burns (Eds.), Encyclopedia of leadership (Vol. 1, pp. 1430-1436). SAGE Publications, Inc.,https://www-doi org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.4135/9781412952392.n327
Conflict Management and Negotiation. (2009). In Encyclopedia of Management (6th ed., pp.120 125).https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3273100051/GVRL?u=umd_umuc&sid=GVR& d=28f7e6ab
Dooley, A. (2015). Conflict Management. Praxis Framework. Retrieved from https://www.praxisframework.org/en/knowledge/knowledge-overview .
Dundis, S., & Benson, S. (2003). Building more effective virtual teams: an examination of the task variable in online group problem-solving. International Journal on E-Learning, 2(4), 24+.https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A112542669/CDB?u=umd_umuc&sid=CDB&xid=0 2883e6
FRANK, M. G. (2002). Nonverbal Communication. In J. R. Schement (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Communication and Information (Vol. 2, pp. 669-677). Macmillan Reference USA. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3402900188/GVRL?u=umd_umuc&sid=GVRL&xid df1dd8cb
Goleman, D. (2013). Curing the Common Cold of Leadership: Poor Listening. Educator Update, 15–16.
Haynes, T. (2007). Management/Leadership Styles. In B. S. Kaliski (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Business and Finance (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 477-482). Macmillan Reference USA. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX1552100206/GVRL?u=umd_umuc&sid=GVRL&xid d8ac5c6e.
Intercultural and International Business Communications. Retrieved Jan 22,2021 fromhttps://saylordotorg.github.io/text_business-communication-for-success/s22 interculturaland-internationa.html
Irwin, B. (2007). Politics, leadership, and the art of relating to your project team. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2007—North America, Atlanta, GA. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Kelly L. Perfecting the Art of Active Listening. (cover story). Personal Excellence. 2014;19(6):5-6. Accessed January 26, 2021. https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.umgc.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=96657247&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Ki-Young Jeong, Bozkurt, I., & Sunkara, S. T. (2012). Creating Effective Project Teams Using Personality Models. Proceedings for the Northeast Region Decision Sciences Institute (NEDSI), 403–414.
Leadership Styles and Bases of Power. (2009). In Encyclopedia of Management (6th ed., pp. 459-462). Gale. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3273100154/GVRL?u=umd_umuc&sid=GVRL&xid=beae55b7
Leadership Theories and Studies. (2009). In Encyclopedia of Management (6th ed., pp. 462-467). Gale. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3273100155/GVRL?u=umd_umuc&sid=GVRL&xid=c2b1a48f
Levine, L. (1994). Listening with spirit and the art of team dialogue. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 7(1), 61. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.1108/09534819410050803
Levine, R. V. (2021). Time and Culture. Retrieved from NOBA: https://nobaproject.com/modules/time-and-culture
Mclean, S. (2010). Business Communication for Success. Flat World Knowledge, Inc.
Mehl, A. (n.d.). Executive & Business Coaching. A-E-I-O-U Model of Managing Conflict. Retrieved from https://www.annmehl.com/a-e-i-o-u-model-of-managing-conflict .
Migliore, L.A. (2011), "Relation between big five personality traits and Hofstede's cultural
dimensions: Samples from the USA and India", Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal , Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 38-54. https://doi-org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.1108/13527601111104287
Motivation and Motivation Theory. (2009). In Encyclopedia of Management (6th ed., pp. 591-594). Gale.https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3273100192/GVRL?u=umd_umuc&sid=GVRL&xid=052a3d59
National culture. (2021). Hofstede Insights. https://hi.hofstede-insights.com/national-culture
Orbe, M. P. (2009). Co-Cultural Theory. Encyclopedia of communication theory, 1, 109-108.
Problem solving and decision making in groups. Ch.14. (n.d.)In, Creative Commons A primer in communication studies (Ch.14).[eBook edition]. https://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/a-primer-on-communication-studies/s14-03-problem-solving-and-decision-m.html
Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK(R) Guide–Sixth Edition / Agile Practice Guide Bundle: Vol. Sixth edition. Project Management Institute.
Reinsborough, B. J. (2007). Meeting Management. In B. S. Kaliski (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Business and Finance (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 509-511). Macmillan Reference USA. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX1552100215/GVRL?u=umd_umuc&sid=GVRL&xid=b1238ca2 .
Roebuck, D. B., Bell, R. L., Raina, R., & Lee, C. E. (2015). The Effects of Home Country, Gender, and Position on Listening Behaviors. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, COMMUNICATIONS AND CONFLICT, 19(2).
Schneid, M., Isidor, R., Steinmetz, H., & Kabst, R. (2016). Age diversity and team outcomes: a quantitative review. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(1), 2-17. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.1108/JMP-07-2012-0228
Small group dynamics. (2012) A Primer on Communication Studies. https://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/a-primer-on-communication-studies/s13-03-small-group-dynamics.html
Sullivan, L. E. (2009). Intrinsic motivation. In The SAGE glossary of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 271-271). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://www-doi-org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.4135/9781412972024.n1366
Sullivan, L. E. (2009). Extrinsic motivation. In The SAGE glossary of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 196-196). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://www-doi-org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.4135/9781412972024.n979
Sullivan, L. E. (2009). Verbal communication. In The SAGE glossary of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 535-535). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://www-doi-org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.4135/9781412972024.n2643
Thomas, K. (2009). The four intrinsic rewards that drive employee engagement. Ivey Business Journal. Retrieved from https://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/the-four-intrinsic-rewards-that-drive-employee-engagement/
Thomas, K. W., & Thomas, G. F. (2008). Conflict styles of men and women at six organization levels. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19(2), 148-166. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.1108/10444060810856085
Ungvarsky, J. (2020). Critical Skills: Listening. Salem Press Encyclopedia.
Volkema, R. J., & Avery, M. (1988). Power Behind the Pen: Developing the Role of an Active Meeting Recorder. SAM Advanced Management Journal (07497075), 53(3), 45.
Wegge, J., Jungmann, F., Liebermann, S., Shemla, M., Ries, B. C., Diestel, S., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2012). What makes age diverse teams effective? Results from a six-year research program. Work, 41, 5145–5151. https://doi-org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.3233/wor-2012-0084-5
Small Group Dynamics, section 13.3 A Primer on Communication Studies (v. 1.0).
Parks, C. (2004). Groupthink. In G. R. GoethalsG. J. Sorenson, & J. M. Burns (Eds.), Encyclopedia of leadership (Vol. 1, pp. 636-639). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://www-doi-org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.4135/9781412952392.n143
Aakhus, M. (2002). Group Communication, Conflict and. (J. R. Schement, Ed.) Encyclopedia of Communication and Information, 2, 376-379. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3402900117/GVRL?u=umd_umuc&sid=GVRL&xid=5b07f879
Salazar, A. J. (2009). Groupthink. (S. W. Littlejohn, & K. A. Foss, Eds.) Encyclopedia of communication theory, 1, 461-462. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.4135/9781412959384
Sullivan, L. E. (2009). Conflict Management/Resolution. SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.4135/9781412972024
AAKHUS, M. (2002). Group Communication, Decision Making and. In J. R. Schement (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Communication and Information (Vol. 2, pp. 379-382). Macmillan Reference USA. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3402900118/GVRL?u=umd_umuc&sid=GVRL&xid=b330afd9
Majority Rule. (2008). In W. A. Darity, Jr. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 560-562). Macmillan Reference USA. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3045301424/GVRL?u=umd_umuc&sid=GVRL&xid=5182b115
Barton, B. F. (1925). The man nobody knows. Bobbs-Merrill Company.
"Communication Systems." (2007) Encyclopedia of Small Business, (3rd ed., volVol. 1, Gale, 2007, pp. 198-202). Gale eBooks, retrieved from link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX2687200118/GVRL?u=umd_umuc&sid=GVRL&xid=affebcb4. Accessed 21 Feb. 2021.
Benoliel, B., Dr. (2017, May 30). What's your conflict management style.Walden Edu. Retrieved March 1, 2021, Retrieved from https://www.waldenu.edu/news-and-events/walden-news/2017/ 0530-whats-your-conflict-management-style
Choi, Y. (2013). The influence of conflict management culture on job satisfaction. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41(4), 687–692. https://doi-org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.4.687
Gawel, J. E. (1997). Herzberg's theory of motivation and Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 5(11). Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=5&n=11
Eisenberg, J. (2007). Group cohesiveness. In R. F. Baumeister, & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 387-388). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://www-doi-org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.4135/9781412956253.n237. Motivating Employees, Chapter 14. Retrieved from Institute.https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_principles-of-management-v1.1/s18-motivating-employees.html
Decker, E. (2015). Trust: the foundation for building cohesive teams. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2015—EMEA, London, England. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Kyriakidou, O. (2009). Decision making. In C. Wankel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of business in today's world (pp. 486-487). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://www-doi-org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.4135/9781412964289.n283
Thomas Kenneth. (2009). The Four Intrinsic Rewards that Drive Employment Engagement. Ivey Business Journal. Retrieved from https://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/the-four-intrinsic-rewards-that-drive-employee-engagement/
Managing Groups and Teams. (2012). Saylor Academy. https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_principles-of-management-v1.1/s17-managing-groups-and-teams.html
Mastering Argumentative and Persuasive Writing. (n.d.). Toulmin’s Schema. Retrieved from https://courses.lumenlearning.com/ivytech-engl111/chapter/toulmins-schema.
|
Week # |
Reading Assignment |
Person Reading |
Topics put in GCCM |
Justification |
|
2 |
PMBOK Chapter 9.4 Develop Team |
Ana Paddack |
Teams improve individual competencies, enhance motivation and enhance project performance by providing challenges, opportunities, feedback/support and rewarding high performance. High Performance is achieved by keeping open communication, creating team building opportunities, developing trust, managing and solving conflict in constructive ways. Tuckman 5 stages of Team Development: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing and Adjourning |
Important to justify importance of developing a team, promoting good communication and creating team building opportunities while capitalizing on diversity. Also important for understanding 5 stages of development described by Tuckman |
|
2 |
Intercultural and International Business Communication
|
Ana Paddack |
Cross border communication across different time zones is common. Culture influences: communication source, receiver, channel, feedback,context, environment and interference. Intrapersonal/Intracultural Communication represents communication with yourself and represents only one culture. Ethnocentrism which involves stereotyping is a major obstacle to intercultural communication. McGregor’s Theories: Theory Y: employees are ambitious, self-directed and self-motivated engage in reaching their highest potential. Theory X: Manager uses control to incentivize employees. Lack of training and tools are reasons to stop working and fixing resources is up to manager. Ochi’s Theory: Combines theory X and Y promotes employee excellence, job rotation, skill development, and loyalty. Workers are trusted to do their job well and management is trusted to support them |
Important to understand how culture affects the way people perceive group interactions. McGregor’s Theory X and Y and Ochis’s theory provide good points for further analysis for the GCCM plan. |
|
2 |
Verbal Communication |
Ana Paddack |
Definition “use of language and its symbols and sounds to convey messages”. Verbal Communication is complemented by body language, sounds, tone, gestures, movement and stress. Gender, class, ethnicity, education, verbalization can influence communication in a social setting. Main challenge is effective transfer of information due to variability of human speech and personal assumptions and expressions. It is suggested to learn etiquette to use culturally accepted forms of verbal expression
(Sullivan, 2009)
|
Important to clearly understand what encompasses Verbal Communication to be able to create an effective communication plan |
|
2 |
Non-Verbal Communication |
Ana Paddack |
Non-verbal communication is more than body language. It provides the background for communication. It connects the behavior or dress of others or can be a message itself (frown= unhappiness, wave=goodbye)Ekman and Izard argue that facial expressions are not simple reflexes. People can learn to control expressions depending on rules of culture and subculture “In Japan people learned not to show in public anger to high status people in other countries this does not apply”. Nonverbal communication affects all interpersonal encounters. People use it as indicator of the true essence of a person. Confucius Chinese philosopher “one can better understand others by looking into their eyes rather than listening to their words”. (Frank 2020) |
Important to stress significance and weight of non-verbal communication is all personal and virtual interactions |
|
2 |
Listening with Spirit and the Art of Team Dialogue |
Ana Paddack |
Dialogue is a creative, open ended activity of a group thinking together “It is a conversation of possibility” Discussion is about options, conversation about action and choice. Team Dialogue is collective and entails selfless receptivity to other’s ideas to create a common idea shaped and sustained by the power of collective listening and collective spirit. “Wisdom, insight, change and action don’t come from better thinking, testing and strategizing but from letting go, receiving and listening” (Levine 1994) |
As we work in a team active listening will be key for project success. The concepts of dialogue and discussion are key in understanding the art of listening with spirit and embracing open dialogue. Breaking egocentrism to create one team that represents all our ideas. |
|
2 |
Time and Culture |
John Kelly |
Societies across the world place different values on what is more important than time or culture. Culture meaning the enjoyment one gets from living life. Some cultures, such as the United States and Japan, prioritize time over culture. In those societies, time equals money, and money motivates individuals. Time-based cultures focus on work, punctuality and generally concentrate on priorities as they relate to time. In contrast, European cultures such as Italy value living in the moment. Similar cultures focus on experiencing the joys of interactions, nature, and life. How long something takes is of little consequence to a person who focuses on enjoying the moment. (Lavine, 2021) |
This item is essential because businesses are global now, and a different understanding of cultures is vital for effective communication. Understanding the different values other societies have avoids conflict in multicultural teams. |
|
2 |
Co-cultural Theory |
John Kelly |
Co-culture theory focuses on how culture and power impact communication, specifically minorities or those in subcultures (women, disabled, LBGTQ, lower economic status, first-generation college students, immigrants, international students). Co-culture theory has five assumptions, a hierarchy of power exists, dominant group members occupy the most powerful positions, power of the dominant group impacts non-dominant groups, differences and similarities exist between co-culture groups. Co-culture groups are more aware of the importance of strategic communication. (Orbe, 2009) |
Co-culture theory is a part of the plan because we need to recognize the impact dominant group members have on subcultures. To have effective communication, we must create an environment where everyone is comfortable. Co-culture highlights the importance of monitor communication to ensure open and free dialogue exists. |
|
2 |
Nonverbal Delivery
|
John Kelly |
Nonverbal communication is what the speaker does not say aloud. Nonverbal communication includes gestures, facial expressions, tone, timing, posture, and stance. It can hinder or advance communication and is very complicated. Nonverbal communication is continuous, and it is difficult to determine when the message ends and begins. Actions speak louder than words, so a speaker must be mindful of non-verbal communication. Nonverbal communication is universal. Other aspects of nonverbal communication consist of distance from the speaker to the audience, tattoos or piercings, movement, cadence of speech, and movement. (McClean, 2010) |
Nonverbal communication is just as important if not more important than verbal communication. Nonverbal communication is added to our plan because the speaker must ensure their nonverbal speech matches what they are saying. |
|
2 |
The Effects of Home Country, Gender, and Position on Listening Behaviors
|
John Kelly |
Listening is a top 10 rated practice for effective business; however, it is frequently overlooked. Listening now requires even more emphasis due to the globalization of business. Listeners must account for cultural differences while listening. Listening is the link to build knowledge and helps develop intellectual capital. Generally, women are better listeners than men. Men are task-focused and hear in terms of goals and current tasks. In contrast, women listen for emotion, content, and delivery. Managers also listen better than non-managers. As one's responsibility increases, so do their listening skills. Culture is also a large factor in what individuals listen for during conversation. Time-based culture is similar to men in that they are task focus. However, a culture that prioritizes life listens similarly to women and what to enjoy what the person is saying. |
The effects of the home country, gender, and position on listening behaviors were added to our plan because effective communicators need to know their audience. The only way to ensure communication has intended results is to tailor it to the audience receiving it. By understanding what different genders, cultures, and levels of responsibility look for, we can focus our information for maximum effectiveness. |
|
2 |
Curing the Common Cold of Leadership: Poor Listening |
Charise Moore |
Goleman’s article stresses the prevalence of poor listening in leadership and people in general. He highlights the overwhelming factors that lead to this poor habit. From nonstop meetings, phone calls, email, and text messages they all command your attention and lead to distracting you from a source that could be standing right in front of you. “We’re too busy (we think) to take the time to listen fully, this leads to the common cold of the workplace” (p.15). Subconsciously, we tune out what a person is saying before we understand and telling them what we think too soon (p.15). Goleman believes that real listening occurs when you hear the person who is speaking out, no interruptions then responding in a mutual dialogue. The challenge with this habit is changing the behavior to become more an effective listener. It is possible the author points out. The key is being mindful of the moments in your day when you have a naturally occurring opportunity to practice good listening (p.15). |
The impact of poor listening skills, the reason for it, and significance of exploring options to overcome it. |
|
2 |
Perfecting the Art of Active Listening |
Charise Moore |
Perfecting the Art of Active Listening is a brief but telling article that focuses on the reasons so many poor listeners exist and the reason. Kelly believes that there are reasons that can explain the existence of poor listeners: Lack of formal training; We possess the ability to think faster than we speak; We practice lazy and inattentive listening habits; We lose our listening skills as we develop; We fall victim to listening roadblocks (p. 5). To elaborate further the reasons Kelly provides focuses on the lack of listen courses available in comparison to English and/or writing courses, we think faster than we speak, we listen for the moment over time we lose what we have previously retained, the saying true children are like sponges but as time progresses the art of listening decreases and if a message being is not of interest recipient will be incapable of listening. To adopt active listening skills the author believes that we need to be fully present, use body language to ensure the speaker that you are engaged, listen with the heart, discern mixed or unspoken messages, and refrain from interrupting the other person and possibly take notes to obtain clarity once the speaker has stopped (p.5).
|
The significance of the article centers around improving the way we listen, understanding the art of it to improve chances of more active listening skills anf information retainment. . |
|
2 |
Power Behind the Pen: Developing the Role of an Active Meeting Recorder |
Charise Moore |
Volkema and Avery take the opportunity to highlight the significance of an active meeting recorder aka note taker and the meeting facilitator and the importance of treating the roles as a cooperative team effort. Taking on the role of the active meeting recorder is not one to be taken lightly. It takes time, effort, stellar listening skills, and the ability to interact with the group and facilitator to ensure that information is captured accurately and precisely. The authors describe how the role is an often-overlooked source of assistance. Often the tasks are reverted to an individual not part of the work group possibly a secretary or intern (p.45). This role is not powerless and carries significant weight. The active recorder purpose is not only to document the meetings discussion but to assist the facilitator or in some instances take on facilitative tasks when appropriate. By legitimating the role of the recorder and treating the facilitator and a unit, decision making groups can give their meetings more direction and their participants more opportunities for involvement (p.48). Ending with greater satisfaction and productivity.
|
Highlights the significance of the active recorder and benefits of having a collaborative relationship with the facilitator to increase meeting productivity. |
|
2 |
Gender Composition on Team Performance and Decision Making |
Charise Moore |
The authors center the article around the impact of varying gender composition in group decisions and its influence on economic performance. Research has shown that the most generous groups consist of two men and one woman and that groups that are majority women are more equalitarian (p.79). This is achieved by performing a study on an online business game, the L’Oréal e-Strat Challenge, which is played by groups of three. The purpose of this study was to simulate real world business decisions and the influence gender composition has on the outcomes and decisions made. The analysis of the study showed that teams formed by three women are significantly outperformed by any other gender combination (p.75). At the top 20%, three-women teams are outperformed by only 0.09. We also find evidence that the optimal gender composition along the whole distribution is that of two men and one woman, although the differences are not statistically significant (p.80). The findings suggest that teams with mixed genders show the highest performance. Diversity in teams could be implicative of good team dynamics (p. 93).
|
The importance of varying genders on the performance in groups supports an equalitarian approach as the group proceeds with collaboration. |
|
2 |
What makes age diverse teams effective? |
Christina |
Wegge, Jungmann, Liebermann, Shemla, Ries, Diesel and Schmidt (2012) conducted a research study to examine productivity levels in age diverse teams. The study included participants of varying ages in three fields of work: financial, administrative, and vehicle manufacturing. Their results demonstrated remarkable advantages and disadvantages to age diversity in teams. Wegge et al. then utilized their results to create a training program with the intended purpose of more successfully assimilating age diverse teams.
|
This study revealed both advantages and disadvantages to age diversity on teams. This information is useful for training and planning purposes. |
|
2 |
Age Diversity and Team Outcomes |
Christina |
A study on age diversity and team outcomes, Schneid, Isidor, Steinmetz, and Kabst (2016) explored research on results of age diverse teams. Their literature review concentrated exclusively on age diversity as they posited that varying diversity attributes required individual focus for research and study. Schneid et al examined age diversity’s function or relationship to overall team performance, group creativity, efficacy, team satisfaction, financial results, and team member retention. The research team found inconclusive results pertaining to age diversity and performance in most factors they reviewed.
|
Although this study was deemed inconclusive, it is always valuable to consider diversity effects and include training where necessary. |
|
2 |
Creating Effective Project Teams Using Personality Models |
Christina |
Stepping away from traditional project team formation research, Ki-Young, Bozkurt, and Sunkara shifted their focus to the lesser studied diverse characteristic team formation. The study’s authors focused on methods of maximization, particularly as it pertained to personality traits. Ki-Young et al reviewed the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-Behavior (FIRO-B) and Kolbe Conative Index (KCI) to determine which personality model would be most effective for their study’s purposes. To be able to include quantitative measure rather than just personality type, they decided to use the KCI and FIRO-B models to create their own numerical model from which to develop effectual teams.
|
Personality models are an effective tool to create effective project teams. |
|
2 |
Critical Skills: Listening |
Christina |
Ungvarsky discusses listening as a skill, one that requires constant active thought and analysis. Ungvarssky states that it is this “intentional” or active listening that is a learned skill required for successful relationships both business and personal. To listen properly, one must pay attention and listen without planning their response while listening (Ungvarsky, 2020). The idea is to focus, maintain eye contact, provide affirmative responses, and to extract the message without judgement. After the speaker is done relaying their message, the active listener can then request clarification where required and repeat back the message to the speaker as they understand it.
|
Active listening is a critical skill both professionally and personally. As it pertains to project teams and communication planning in general, it never hurts to review the steps of active listening. |
|
2 |
Hofstede- Cultural Dimensions |
Christina |
Professor Geert Hofstede conducted a study that assessed workplace values and the ways they influenced work culture. The six dimensions of national culture named the Hofstede Model include: (1) Power Distance Index (PDI), (2) Individualism vs. Collectivism (IDV), (3) Masculinity vs. Femininity (MAS), (4) Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI), (5) Long Term Orientation vs. Short Term Informative Orientation (LTO), and (6) Indulgence vs. Restraint. Hofstede’s Model describes dimensions of values and how they affect the workplace. PDI is about power and how it is handled, IDV examines individuality vs. community- or “I vs. We”, MAS dimension analyzes penchants between masculinity vs femininity, UAI analyzes level of discomfort regarding uncertainty- flexibility vs. rigidity, LTO analyzes how closely tradition is valued vs. changing with the times, and lastly, IVR analyzes gratification vs. restriction (National Culture, 2021). |
Hofstede’s workplace values are a useful tool for managing teams and determining what team members value most in the workplace. |
|
2 |
Relation between Big Five Personality Traits and Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions |
Jenny |
Case study of intercultural dynamics within a multinational tech company. User Five Factor Personality Model to evaluate how personality scores correlate to cultural dimensions. A correlation exists, but is dependent on the job category and evidenced in leadership characteristics. |
The discussion of five major personality traits is helpful research for discerning what contributes to organizational culture. The case study also provides significant insight into intercultural dynamics within an organization |
|
2 |
Simplifying Learning and Communicating Concepts |
Jenny |
This video describes the Feynman Technique for learning new topics. The initial step is to study the topic. Then write about the topic and speak aloud. When you’re stuck, study more and repeat the process using more simplified language and/or graphics. Repeat until you have used the simplest language possible. This will demonstrate you have understood the topic. |
The Feynman Technique provides a strategy for communicating clearly and effectively. This is particularly useful for training dynamics. |
|
3 |
(*)PMBOK Guide: Ch. 13, Section 13.1 Identify Stakeholders |
John Kelly |
Stakeholder management is identifying people, groups, and organizations that impact or are impacted by the project. The project manager must also plan, manage and monitor stakeholder engagement—Additionally, the project management but review project documents to understand the project's goals. Identifying stakeholders occurs throughout the lifecycle of the project. New stakeholders emerge, and some go away. Consultation with the most affected stakeholders is vital. Once identified, the PM must create a way to document changes to the project, highlight organizational research, and gather relevant data. The PM needs to present data to the stakeholders allowing them to make informed decisions. Perform stakeholder analysis to determine the stakes. For example, a business owner is concerned with financial success and other provided expertise. Once the PM understands the stakeholders prioritizes, they can present the most applicable information. |
Identifying stakeholders is a critical step in project management. Knowing who has a vested interest in the project makes it easier to create useful documentation. Without stakeholders the project has little direction and oversight. |
|
3 |
(*)PMBOK Guide: Chapter 10, Section 10.1, Plan Communications |
John Kelly |
Planning communications management is developing a way to communicate activities based on the information needs of the stakeholders. The includes when, how, and what to share and with whom. The plan must consider the member's locations and preferred methods of communication. Depending on the size or complexity of the project, required communication to management may increase or decrease. Communication is the most critical aspect of project management. When detailed information is transmitted, individuals can make an informed decision and highlight potential problems. |
A communication plan is necessary for all projects. We added it to our project, so every member knows when and how information is transmitted. The plan shows who needs information and how to share that data. |
|
3 |
(*)Communication |
Ana Maria |
Communication is the means by which info is exchanged with the goal of sharing relevant info and ensuring information is understood. Communication can be formal, informal, active, passive, conscious and unconscious. These factors modify written, verbal and body language. The Berlo’s model provides simply structures to understand the complex aspects of communication. Message transmission and reception depends on personal values, vested interests, frame of mind and learning styles. Traditional channels (paper, telephone, face to phace) are being replaced by e-mail, teleconferencing, social media. Acronyms and jargon can make communication more efficient but alienate those not familiar with it. Small projects could work with verbal communication that relies on memory and interpretation but larger/complex projects require a culture of effective communication based on coordination and planned dissemination of relevant information. |
When talking about a communication management plan it is important to understand what is communication and what it entails. The article offers important information on understanding the complex aspects of communication |
|
3 |
(*)Communication Planning |
Ana Maria |
Communication planning process involves defining the type of communication that will be delivered, recipients and timing for dissemination. Key is “to get the right message at the right time” Communication can be Synchronous and involves real time exchanges samples include life meetings, audio and video conference calls, instant messaging, texting. Communication can also be Asynchronous when it is challenging to get the team together at the same time due to time zone difference. Mail,package delivery, fax, e-mail are some samples of asynchronous communication. |
We added this reading to our plan as it is important to fully understand all factors and challenges that affect communication planning |
|
3 |
(*)Understanding and Meeting Client Expectations |
Jenny Wilson |
Client satisfaction is critical to a project’s success, but stakeholders must contribute to the project. As the leader of the project, the project manager is responsible for including and motivating the client.This includes educating the client on project management and narrowing their participation to areas in which their expert knowledge is most valuable. |
Educating the client on project management helps to set expectations of the project lifecycle, and mitigate potential frustration down the road. Encouraging the client to contribute their expertise gives them increased ownership over the project. |
|
3 |
Project Stakeholders |
Jenny Wilson |
This source discusses the various categories internal and external stakeholders may fall into: top management, project team, peers, customers, Government, etc. It identifies the benefits and challenges of involving each stakeholder category in the project. |
The analysis of each stakeholder group is useful when considering potential conflicts and the mitigation efforts they may require. |
|
3 |
Communications Planning |
Jenny Wilson |
A communication plan is created to structure the flow of information and capture the information needs of project team members and stakeholders. The level of detail included in the plan is dependent on the complexity of the project. Complex projects should include more detail to ensure information is being communicated effectively. However, the communication plan should be mindful of overloading members with information.n It should include a communication matrix and document control. |
Establishing a communication plan provides the organization a project team needs to avoid potential communication gaps. The matrix serves as a visual for communication responsibilities. Document control provides accountability. |
|
3 |
Communication Systems |
Charise Moore |
Communication systems are the different processes and methods in which information is delivered in a business between managers and lower level employees. Communication whether written, verbal, nonverbal, visual, oral, electronic has a significant impact on the way business is conducted (p.198). The goal of communication is to convey a message that is clear and easily understood. There are challenges that can occur at various stages during the pursuit to communicate. This can be a result of differing expectations and perceptions, lack of basic language skills, distractions, and /or selectivity (p.198). Unclear, inaccurate, or inconsiderate business communication can waste valuable time, alienate employees or customers, and destroy goodwill toward management or the overall business. For example: Written communication is the most common form of communication as more companies operate their businesses in virtual sitting. The emphasis is on good writing skills within a growing industry of remedial writing and to convey in an accurate and concise manner. Oral communication: Listening is often overlooked for important elements. Nonverbal communication: facial expressions, body gestures, and tone of voice may provide more insight then verbal communication.External/Internal communication are also significant mediums that have proven to be essential for a business to be online and keep employees in the loop. Overall, good communication should be complete, concise, clear, concrete, considerate, and courteous (p.201). |
This article summarizes the significance of the various communication methods that are utilized to convey messages. |
|
3 |
The Measurement and Evaluation of the Internal Communication Process in Project Management |
|
|
|
|
3 |
The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance |
|
|
|
|
3 |
(*)Stakeholder Theory |
Charise Moore |
Stakeholder theory focuses on the attempt to identify , explain, and prescribe an organization's relationships and responsibility to other actors (p. 930). In the past stakeholders sole responsibility was centered around obtaining the greatest profit. The extent of current uses of stakeholders extend to: a) descriptive b)instrumental-how to accomplish desired outcomes c) normative uses-prescriptive manners (ethics & philosophies) ( p. 930).
Identifying and prioritizing stakeholders is another critical factor in determining who would be a valuable contributor and hold weight in making decisions that will result in desired outcomes. There three critical characteristics that would assist with making this decision including: 1) Power to influence 2) Legitimacy of their claim and 3) Urgency of claim (p.931). In general, communication scholars draw upon stakeholder theory to understand how organizations communicate with and are held accountable to multiple stakeholders (p.931). |
This article summarizes the effort that goes into identifying stakeholders and determining what level of decision making should be appointed to who. Stakeholders can make or break a project and ensuring that the appropriate stakeholder(s) is involved from start to end will benefit the overall progress success. |
|
3 |
Communication Skills |
|
|
|
|
3 |
Stakeholder Analysis: Process Model |
|
|
|
|
3 |
Project Communications Management in Practice |
|
|
|
|
4 |
(*)Chapter 10: Leading People and Organizations |
Ana Paddack |
P-O-L-C framework: Includes 1) Planning (vision & mission, strategizing and goals and objectives) 2)Organizing (organization design, culture and social networks) 3)Leading (leadership, decision making, communications, groups/teams, motivation) 4) Controlling (systems and processes, human resource strategy). The big five personality traits that predict leadership are openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. Traits associated with leadership are: integrity, intelligence (both mental and emotional intelligence), extraversion, conscientious, open to experience and self esteem. One of the limitations of using a trait approach to predict leadership is that it ignores the situation in which leadership occurred. Under different conditions different leadership traits might be needed. Leaders can have task oriented or people oriented behaviors. The three types of decision-making style are authoritarian, democratic and laissez-faire. These behaviours are also limited to the environment and there is no best style as the effectiveness of each style can vary across situations. Contingency approaches to leadership describe the role a situation would play in choosing the most effective leadership style. Transformational Leaders lead employees by aligning their goals to the leader’s goals using charisma, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration. Transactional leaders ensure employees demonstrate the right behavior because leaders provide the right resources in exchange. |
We selected the content of chapter 10 because it helped us define what leadership is and identify the traits and behaviors of effective leaders. |
|
4 |
(*)Chapter 14 Motivating Employees |
Ana Paddack |
Motivation is defined as achieving a goal that mixed with ability and environment can lead to high performance. Motivation alone is not sufficient. Ability which includes having the skills and knowledge required to perform a job is also important in addition to having the resources, information and support one needs to perform well. Motivation is essential in leading the P-O-L-C framework. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs says that human beings have needs that are hierarchically ranked. Once lower-level needs are satisfied it no longer serves as motivators. Needs are hierarchically organized as Physiological (air, food, water). Safety, Social, Esteem and Self-actualization ERG Theory by Clayton proposes that basic human needs are grouped under three categories (existence, relatedness and growth). Two-factor Theory differentiates between factors that make people dissatisfied on the job (hygiene factors) and factors that truly motivate employees and finally acquired-needs theory argues that people have stable and dominant motives to achieve, acquire power and affiliate with others. Process-based theories use the mental processes of employees as the key to understanding employee motivation. According to equity theory, employees are demotivated when they view reward distribution as unfair. In addition to distributive justice, research identified two other types of fairness (procedural and interactional), which also affect worker reactions and motivation. According to expectancy theory, employees are motivated when they believe that their effort will lead to high performance. Reinforcement theory argues that behavior is a function of its consequences. By properly tying rewards to positive behaviors, eliminating rewards following negative behaviors and punishing negative behaviors, leaders can increase the frequency of desired behaviors. Skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, and feedback increase motivation. Goal-setting theory is one of the most influential theories of motivation. To motivate employees, goals should be SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and timely). Setting goals and objectives is a task managers undertake when involved in the planning portion of the P-O-L-C function. |
We selected the information from this reading to better understand motivation, motivational theories and how fairness perceptions are determined and their consequences to be able to provide recommendations that will help us develop motivation skills. |
|
4 |
Motivation: Origins of the Extrinsic/Intrinsic Debate |
John Kelly |
This article focuses on the effect of extrinsic vs. intrinsic forms of motivation. Intrinsic motivation is an inner desire or motivation to perform because it provides reinforcement (Hummel, 2014). Extrinsic motivation is doing an activity because you want to receive an award or some recognition. The article concludes that managers should use a variety of positive consequences to maintain and improve performance. The report states that managers and leaders must utilize various motivation tactics based on the situation and the follower preferences. |
Understanding the different methods of motivation is essential for those who wish to lead effectively. As leaders, we will encounter different types of follows and be involved in various situations. In regards to motivation, one-size does not fit all. A leader must recognize the environment they operate in and understand what motivates their followers. By being aware of their followers and the situation, the leader can implement the best motivational tactics to get the best results. |
|
4 |
(*)The Four Intrinsic Rewards that Drive Employee Engagement |
Jenny Wilson |
As the work requirements have changed, worker expectations have evolved. The authors argue that worker motivation is centered on purpose and intrinsic rewards are driven by: 1. Committing to a meaningful purpose 2. Choosing the best way of fulfilling that purpose 3. Making sure that one is performing work activities competently, and 4. Making sure that one is making progress to achieving the purpose. The authors also provide seven guidelines for building a high-engagement culture within the workplace.
|
This source is useful for understanding what motivates team members and how to encourage them. |
|
4 |
(*)Extrinsic Motivation |
Jenny Wilson |
Extrinsic motivation is associated with material rewards outside the individual (e.g., payment). Emphasis is placed on the reward and not the behavior. |
This source provides a clear and concise definition of extrinsic motivation. |
|
4 |
(*)Intrinsic Motivation |
Jenny Wilson |
Intrinsic motivation align’s with an individual’s internal drive. It links behavior with purpose. |
This source provides a clear and concise definition of intrinsic motivation. |
|
4 |
(*)Leadership Theories and Studies |
Christina Horning |
The Encyclopedia of Management defines leadership as a method of motivating people towards achieving goals. In this definition, leadership is a social construct that encourages others to participate of their own volition and their participation is directed towards a common goal. The article reviews the study of leadership over time to bring more clarity to the definition. Further, it is stated that management and leadership are different concepts. The distinction between them is their level of authority. Management has authority over those they lead by the formality of the position. Leaders, however, may not necessarily have formal authority to aid them in their leadership goals and therefore must rely on their influence. Historical Leadership theories described were Trait, Behavioral, Contingency, Leader-Membership Exchange, Charismatic, and Substitutes for Leadership as leadership perspectives. The leadership theory review emphasized Trait Approach, Leader-Behavior Approach, and Contingency Theory as the primary theories. None of the theories were deemed a sufficient encapsulation of leadership on their own and the other frameworks mentioned remain useful in leadership theory (Encyclopedia of Management, 2009).
|
The importance of this reading is to explore different leadership theories. Primarily, the distinction between leadership and management is an important concept to be familiar with. |
|
4 |
(*)Situational And Contingency Approaches To Leadership |
Christina Horning |
Contingency approaches to leadership emphasize the leader’s traits and situational approaches focus on the leader's perceived behaviors. The contingency model is called a Trait Contingency Model of Leadership, that is, a model where the leader’s traits are the determiner for success. Ayman & Hartman (2004) state that the least preferred coworker, or LPC interacts with the leader’s traits in this scenario. Their view is that the leader’s “inner needs” are reflected onto the subordinate in the situation. The contingency model is further divided into those who are task-oriented and those who are relationship-oriented. This model incorporates traits, climate, and situation to determine a team’s efficacy. Cognitive resource Theory (CRT) is another contingency approach that looks at two factors- a leader’s experience and intelligence. The leader’s stress is also a factor in this theory. Additionally, there are Behavioral Contingency Models that explore how leaders behave in a situation. Path-Goal theory builds on this as it explores how effectively leaders help members clear the path to their goals. Normative Decision-Making Model is a behavioral model that focuses on how the leader act in response to the situation. Situational Leadership Theory starts with four “leader behaviors” which are: telling, selling, participating, and delegating. This theory relates the success and usefulness of these behaviors to a team member’s maturity level. For this theory, the leader leads based on the situation. They “sell” the task when it needs selling, “delegate” when the situation calls for it, “participate” when needed, and they “tell” when someone needs to be told to do a task. The three behavioral models are distinct in that the normative model looks at the decision of the leader, and the path-goal and situational leadership look at the leader’s behavior. Ayman and Hartman reviewed the contingency models and theories as well as one that proposed four variables of note, “the substitutes for leadership theory focuses on how subordinates' needs, abilities, and perceptions interact with the situation. In contrast, the contingency model of leadership effectiveness focuses more on the power source of the leader and how that power source interacts with the situation” (Ayman & Hartman, 2004).
|
This article explains the importance of focusing on the leader’s traits, the situation, and the contingencies when evaluating leadership methods. |
|
4 |
(*)Motivation and Motivation Theory |
Christina Horning |
Motivation Theory examines the why of the behavior. The study of organizational behavior focuses on the motivations behind a person’s behaviors. While studying motivation, early studies examined internal drives and cognitive processes. As motivation knowledge and studies evolved, they were divided into content theories (need) or process theories. Content theories are internal or based on individuals’ inner drives. They include Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Alderfer's ERG theory- this is Maslow’s hierarchy with less categories, existence, relatedness, and growth- this theory excludes basic low-level needs from the equation, Herzberg's motivator-hygiene theory, is specifically related to workplace motivation, and McClelland's learned needs (three-needs theory), which suggest individual needs are culturally based. Process theories of motivation concentrate on cognitive motivation processes. Simply put, behavior is a cognitive and deliberate process. Process theories of motivation are expectancy theory (employees choose behaviors that may lead to expected outcomes), equity theory (more socially based- employees compare their work and rewards to others), goal-setting theory (goals are the motivating factors), and reinforcement theory (behavior is motivated by reinforcers). The Encyclopedia of Management (2009) states that the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator was originally intended for use in WWII to place women in their most effective job position, however, it evolved into a useful tool for determining employees’ motivations.
|
The study of Motivational Theory is key when one is planning on motivating a team or attempting to determine the reasoning for a lack of motivation. |
|
4 |
(*)Leadership Styles and Bases of Power |
Christina Horning |
Leadership approach describes a leader’s methods of planning, inspiring, and offering instructions. Bases of power describes the ways in which a manager uses their authority and influence to lead. Kurt Lewin named three leadership styles, authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-faire. The authoritarian leader dictates without question or comment from subordinates. The democratic leader encourages collaboration, input, and work-load decisions among the group, and the laissez-faire leader provides a lot of freedom and minimal oversight. Lewin favored the democratic style, however, leaders fair best when they alter their leadership style to fit the situation at hand. Next, five bases of power were studied as they demonstrate power: coercive (force power), legitimate (employee believes manager has the right), reward (employees allow based on reward), referent (power is based on respect), and expert (power based on assumption of expertise). Power can be expressed through one or more of these bases and they each have their situations where they are effective like leadership styles. Further, power and authority are “multidimensional because relationships are by nature multidimensional”. Just as leadership styles depend on multiple variables, so do power bases.
|
Knowledge of leadership style and bases of power are important for a leader to be familiar with. |
|
4 |
Six Bases of Power |
John Kelly |
1. Power that leaders to socially independent change 2. Power that results in socially dependent change with surveillance necessary 3. Power that leads to socially dependent change with surveillance unnecessary 4. Coercive power & reward power: personal versus impersonal forms 5. Legitimate power: Position, reciprocity, equity, & Responsibility 6. The power/interaction model of interpersonal influence (Raven, 2004). This article focused on the effects of the six types of power and determined it was challenging to answer. Because different types of power work differently for each leader and follower. The other effects occur due to different skill sets, personalities, and leadership tools. A leader or follow can know what power style is needed but lack the skills to generate the desired effect.
|
The various types of power are useful information to know and understand. Recognizing the different kinds of control a person has and the type of influence needed to generate results can benefit leaders. |
|
4 |
Power and Social Psychology |
John Kelly |
Power is the ability to impose one's will on others (Aanstoos, 2019). The types of power are to coerce, to reward, and to change a belief. These types of power remind me of the carrot or the stick method. A person can either get rewarded or punished depending on their choice. However, the ability to change a person's beliefs is more complicated and requires more energy. Like other studies done on power and its effects, the method used depends on what motivates the follower. Some individuals do not care about rewards and only respond to threats and vice versa. A leader must recognize what motivates their followers. |
The concept of rewards versus threats is a known method of getting desired results. The critical topic to get from this article is understanding your follower's motivations is paramount. |
|
4 |
Life-cycle Model of Leadership |
John Kelly |
This article focuses on situational leadership (SL) and its principles. The three principles of SA are 1. (1) Self-directed work teams advocates that supervision should be minimal when employees are sufficiently capable of being self-directed; (2) employee competence and dedication or professionalism can be viewed as potent substitutes for leadership; and (3) leaders need to be both socially intelligent and flexible in their behavior (Vecchio, 2007). Additionally, they noted that as follower maturity increases, the need for leadership declines but the need for supervisory supportiveness increases. And at the highest levels of follower maturity, the need for structuring and supervisory consideration becomes irrelevant. This report focuses on managerial dynamics and not authentic leadership. These principles highlight an important factor in project management that mature workers require less direct oversight but still need research and information on any project adjustment. |
This information is vital because, as project managers, we need to focus our attention on places that require it the most. Recognizing the mature employees needs less direct supervision, which frees up time to focus on other areas. Additionally, mature works may not enjoy management the deem unnecessary, which can affect production. |
|
4 |
(*)PMBOK Guide (6th ed.): Section 3.4, Project Manager Competencies |
Charise Moore |
Project manager (PM) competencies are a critical component of the role. Three key skill sets are believed to be necessary to ensure that the PM can be the most effective; technical, leadership, and business intelligence(p. 57). Technical PM skills are defined as the skills to effectively apply project management knowledge to deliver desired outcomes for projects or programs (p. 58). The PM should be proficient in managing schedules, issue logs, risks, and time management to name a few areas. Strategic and business management skills involve the ability to see the high-level overview of the organization and effectively negotiate and implement decisions and actions that support strategic alignment and innovation (p. 58). The PM should be knowledgeable enough to explain the business aspect of the effort and implement a plan and/or product that benefits the business. Leadership skills involve the ability to guide, motivate, and direct a team (p.60). Leadership skills are critical to the success of the PM role, a majority if not 100% of the time you will deal with a diverse group of people so being able to adapt your styles of leadership creates a path for project success. |
The PM skills set topic was selected for this article to highlight the significance of being well rounded in the role. The ideal PM that composes the three skills sets are the most effective and will produce desired outcomes in most efforts. |
|
4 |
(*)Management/Leadership Styles |
Charise Moore |
Management and leadership styles differ a bit and many business leaders do not understand the difference between the functions/roles and may misinterpret how to carry out their duties to meet organizational goals (p.478). There are several theories that explain how managers and/or leaders practice. Contingency theory focuses on what managers do in practice, it suggests that how a manager operates and makes decisions depends upon a set of circumstances (p.479). This implies that a manager is not self driven something needs to occur in order for the individual to act. Theory X and Y center around how people work for others (p.479). Theory Z being the most ideal theory focuses on best practices for employee and organizational development. |
This topic was selected because of its emphasis on management and leadership style, and the role that it plays in business success. |
|
4 |
(*)Politics, leadership, and the art of relating to your project team |
Charise Moore |
Politics in project management (PM) refers to the influence and/or persuasion to affect the outcome of an event, decision, or strategic direction (2007). Within any organization you will be faced with both positive and negative politics that will determine how effective you will be as leader or in this case a PM. The positive politics can put you in a position for success. For example cultivating mentors to assistance with building your skill set, or creating a positive impression of yourself. Negative politics could potentially alter the PM’s reputation, and/or project success to name a few. Organizational politics are an unavoidable influence. As project leaders, it's our job to ensure we're acting with others in mind when we act to advance our projects and organizations (2007). |
Politics was the chosen topic from the article because of the inability to avoid it in any work setting. It is unfortunately unavoidable and the project managers to be aware of the positive and negative sides of politics to be aware of its impact on their bottom line and how to remain an effective project leader. |
|
5 |
(*)PMBOK Guide: Chapter 9, Section 9.4 and 9.4 Develop Team |
Christina |
Building a team is one part of acquiring resources. PMBOK delineates between internal and external resources. Internal resources are assigned- usually by management, and external resources are procured. The project team may not have full control during the selection or resources because of prior contracts, subcontractors, project environment, reporting protocol and a host of other reasons. When the project management team is acquiring resources, they should be prepared to negotiate. A project management plan will include plans for resource management, procurement, budget baseline, schedule, resource schedule or calendar, requirements, and stakeholder analysis (PMBOK, 2017, p.366). Next the PM will want to use existing organizational data, lesson learns, procurement procedures, interpersonal skills, and decision-making skills to build the team. Virtual teams can be utilized to widen the geographical net. Once team assignments are made, they will be tracked and allocated with resource calendars. Changes to the resource calendar or schedule, or to the resources allocated will require change requests. Project documents, project schedule, resource breakdown structure, lessons learned, resource requirements, risk register and the stakeholder register will all be updated following the resource acquisition process. Following team assignment, the next stage is team development where the PM seeks to build a cohesive and empowered team. The Tuckman ladder model that consists of the five phases: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning, will typically occur unless the project team is not new to working together (PMBOK, 2017, p.338). Again, project documents will be updated after which the team development will move from the input to the tools and techniques phase. At this stage, location vs virtual, communication, conflict management, motivation, influencing, and team building will be developed and built upon to form the project team. Finally, recognition, rewards, training, assessments, and meetings will all be part of team development.
|
This section of the PMBOK describes resource acquisition and team development. As far as resource allocation goes, the project team is a vitally important resource. |
|
5 |
(*) Managing Conflict |
Christina |
The author describes conflict in this manner as a battle over resources. Conflict can be used positively to enhance creativity and group growth. When not handled in a careful, structured way, conflict can be detrimental to both the team and the team’s progress. Conflict can be viewed malevolently; however, conflict is also a natural result of teamwork The author (s) suggest a conflict management plan which they refer to as a crisis communication plan. Conflict can be categorized in five categories: (1) Conflicts of substance- Are conflicts about choices or about facts. (2) Conflicts of value- Conflicts about differing values or priorities. (3) Conflicts of process- Conflicts of method (4) Conflicts of misperceived differences- Misunderstandings (5) Relationship Conflicts- Conflicts due to personality differences Rather than minimizing or avoiding conflict, team members can choose to engage in conflict management techniques that are non confrontational, controlling, or cooperative. Most recommended is a five-step assertive approach that both avoids judgment and manipulation. The steps are: (1) offer objective description. (2) offer your interpretation (3) express your feelings (4) identify consequences and (5) state your intentions. In this manner, conflict can be addressed without aggression. Other conflict management techniques include offer suggestions without opinion or attachment, try to find common ground, utilize active listening, stay on point, frame as a problem rather than a competition, treat everyone as an equal, consider how important the conflict truly is (is it worth it), determine whether it must be resolved or if it can be let go as an issue that does not need resolution. Good conflict management can take many forms- the key is to maintain self-control and use tools and techniques (and a plan) to effectively manage it.
|
Managing conflict is key to effectively communicating with the project team. |
|
5 |
(*) Conflict Management |
Charise |
The article Conflict Management focuses on the both negative and positive impact of conflict management on the success of a project. The goals of conflict management are to: utilise the positive aspects of conflict; resolve organisational and interpersonal conflict; minimise the impact of conflict on objectives (Praxis,). There are several factors that can contribute to conflicts in groups that may alter outcomes. Such as unspoken assumptions, different personal values, conflicting roles, etc. During any project it should be anticipated that conflict may arise, this could be a learning experience for some but a detrimental factor for others. There are warning signs that signal that a conflict may occur, such as hostility and/r challenges to name a few. If unresolved during the initial stage tis could lead to irreversible damage to the project.
There are multiple ways to address conflict within a project team. In some forms of conflict, a meditator may be useful (Praxis,?). Resolution is the key to ensuring the teams objectives are aligned throughout the duration of the project. Conflict resolution is a complex skill but identifying specific techniques or approaches helps to understand what is involved and develop the right competences (Praxis, ). There are several models that have been developed to identify different aspects of conflict resolution. Different styles are needed in different circumstances but everyone has their own preferred style (Praxis,)
As projects, programmes , and portfolios become more robust it is inevitable that the intensity of conflict will increase. This will call for a methodical approach to addressing conflicts. |
This article was selected because of its high level focus on conflict management. The factors that contribute to conflicts and the various methods that exist to help mitigate the conflicts that could potentially impact a project, program , and/or portfolio. |
|
5 |
(*) A-E-I-O-U Model of Managing Conflict |
Charise |
Managing conflict can be a touchy area in general and especially within project management. Sometimes conflict arises and you may be uncertain of where to begin. “No one likes confrontation, but it is necessary, there are a few basic tools out there that can make all the difference between a successful outcome and a frustrating one”(Mehl).
Mehl’s A-E-I-O-U approach sums up the ideal model for effective communication. Starting with A or acknowledge which generally sets the tone of how the remainder of the resolution process will go. You set the stage for positivity and ensure that the recipient understands that you see their positive intention. E or express is where you communicate what you see or feel about the situation. I or identify is the stage where you propose solutions to the issues that are causing the conflict and/or miscommunication. O or outcome is the stage where you outline the benefits of the outcome. Lastly, U or understanding is the stage you inquire if your proposed resolution to the conflict is acceptable and meets the needs of both parties.
The key to using the A-E-I-O-U method is separating the person from the problem to develop a constructive plan( Mehl). Set an approach with positive intentionality to refrain from hostility or defensiveness from the recipient. |
This article was selected to highlight a constructive method that provides a step by step approach to managing conflict. This method ensures that a positive stage is set early on to make way for a successful resolution. |
|
5 |
(*) Small Group Dynamics |
Jenny |
This source is significantly comprehensive and discusses group cohesion, climate, socialization, pressures, and conflict.
Group climate refers to the quality of the experience of group members as part of the group. Cohesion contributes to the group climate through task cohesion and social cohesion.
Socialization is the process of learning the group’s norms and behaviours.
Group pressures are the motivating factors for group members to conform to group’s norms and expectations.
Group conflict may fall into three categories: procedural, substantive, and interpersonal.
|
This source provides substantial information about group dynamics and conflict. It is very useful in understanding the foundational concepts that contribute to both areas. |
|
5 |
(*) Conflict Management and Negotiation |
Jenny |
The article clearly outlines sources of conflict and several conflict management methodologies.
The sources of conflict include scarce resources, jurisdictional ambiguities, personality clashes, power and status differences, goal differences, and communication breakdown.
The conflict management methodologies explained are Conflict Resolution Grid, The Five A’s Technique, and Quantum Skills. |
This article provides a history of professional conflict management approaches and how they have been applied. |
|
5 |
Conflict Styles |
Charise |
Conflict Styles focuses on the five different methods that are used when addressing a conflict. They include : 1) Avoidance-deciding not to engage in the conflict 2) Competition-there is a winner or loser at the end of the conflict discussion 3) Compromise-there is a middle ground, someone gives up something to benefit others 4) Accommodation-someone caterers to another team members to appease them 5) Collaboration-the group comes together to brainstorm a resolution to the conflict. |
This article was selected because it identifies styles that are used to approach conflict. Most are done subconsciously as a result of actions learned during childhood. |
|
5 |
(*) Conflict Styles of Men and Women at Six Organization Levels |
Jenny |
Researchers analyze conflict styles by organization level and gender. They argue these two elements are salient and ubiquitous features and must be considered when identifying appropriate conflict management methods. |
This article provides insight into how organization level and gender play a role in the conflicts an organization experiences. |
|
5 |
Conflict Management/Resolution |
John Kelly |
Two behavioral dimensions describe conflict management ranging from high to low (Sullivan, 2009). Under the two dimensions, five conflict management styles exist: competing, accommodating, avoiding, compromising, and collaborating. Depending on the situation and the manager’s personality, choose the most appropriate technique. |
Conflict management and resolution are skills needed to lead effectively. |
|
5 |
(*) Group Cohesiveness |
Ana Paddack |
Cohesiveness is the sense of community within the group. Researchers are unclear as to whether cohesiveness is a unidimensional (i.e., cohesiveness is a concept in and of itself) or multidimensional (i.e., cohesiveness is actually a collection of more specific concepts) construct. Being committed to a group does not imply that one is committed to its members, and vice versa. Cohesiveness is strongest when the person is attracted to both the group and its members. Cohesiveness is affected by many things: the extent to which group members like each other, the extent to which the group's goals match one's personal goals, satisfaction with how the group is performing, and the existence of outside factors that discourage a member's exiting the group. The biggest impediment to fostering cohesion is the temporal instability of a group. Well-functioning groups should be kept together as long as possible. Conformity tends to be higher within cohesive groups than within more fractious groups. High cohesiveness can be detrimental to decision-making groups. Cohesiveness impacts the stability of group composition regardless of type of group. The less cohesion, the more likely it is that group members will move to other groups if opportunities to move become available. It is recommended that group managers attend to both the group itself and the needs of individual members,and addressing issues of cohesion is a way for managers to simultaneously attack both types of issues. Cohesiveness can be enhanced by reducing the size of the group, emphasizing a common goal, and reducing perceived differences in member status (Parks 2004).
|
This article was chosen to argument that pros and cost of cohesive teams |
|
5 |
(*) Groupthink |
Ana Paddack |
Groupthink refers to the process that leads a group of capable and talented members to render a poor, often disastrous, group decision. Insulation from outside opinion is problematic. Devil's advocacy has been shown to positively impact decision quality when outside resources are not available. High levels of cohesion can discourage group members from criticizing each other's ideas, for fear of harming relations within the group, yet critical thinking is crucial if the group is favoring a poor choice. The Eight Symptoms of Groupthink, Identified by Irving Janis are: 1) an illusion of invulnerability, shared by most or all the members, which creates excessive optimism and encourages taking extreme risks; 2) collective efforts to rationalize in order to discount warnings which might lead the members to reconsider their assumptions 3) an unquestioned belief in the group's inherent morality, inclining the members to ignore the ethical or moral consequences of their decisions; 4) stereotyped views of enemy leaders as too evil to warrant genuine attempts to negotiate, or as too weak and stupid to counter 5) direct pressure on any member who expresses strong arguments against any of the group's stereotypes, making clear that this type of dissent is contrary to what is expected of all loyal members; 6) self-censorship of deviations from the apparent group consensus, 7) a shared illusion of unanimity by the false assumption that silence means consent); 8) the emergence of self-appointed mindguards—members who protect the group from adverse information that might shatter their shared complacency about the effectiveness and morality of their decisions. The most straightforward advice for a team leader is to tolerate dissent, actively encourage discrepant viewpoints, and support critiquing of one another's ideas as well as look for outsider feedback (Parks 2004). |
Selected to better understand and explain factors that lead to group think and the type of behaviors leaders should embrace to avoid it |
|
5 |
Groupthink |
John Kelly |
Groupthink occurs when a group strives towards unanimity in decision-making at the expense of thoroughly examining all possible solutions (Salazar, 2009). Group thinking is associated with characteristics such as group cohesiveness, structural faults, and provocation situational context. Cohesiveness is the primary factor in groupthink. To avoid group thinks to add new members to groups. |
Groupthink is a negative trend is groups which limites the free flow of ideas. Adding this to our project would help limit group thinking. |
|
5 |
(*) Group Conflict |
Ana Paddack |
Group climate or morale refers to the tone and quality of group interaction that is experienced by group members. Cohesion can be task and social. Task cohesion is the commitment of group members to the purpose and activities of the group. Social cohesion is the attraction and liking among group members. Balance among the two is key. Groups with good levels of cohesiveness set goals easily; exhibit a high commitment to achieving the purpose of the group; are more productive; experience fewer attendance issues; have group members who are willing to stick with the group during times of difficulty; have satisfied group members who identify with, promote, and defend the group; have members who are willing to listen to each other and offer support and constructive criticism; and experience less anger and tension. Qualities that contribute good climate are participating, messages, feedback, equity, clear and accepted roles and motivation. Group cohesion is also demonstrated through symbolic convergence which is a sense of community that develops in a group through non-task-related communication such as stories and jokes. Aside from efficiency, teams are also valued for the potential for innovation. Groups can experience challenges of conformity, groupthink and group conflict. Groups experience different kinds of conflict, including procedural, substantive, and interpersonal conflict. 1) Procedural conflict emerges from disagreements with questions about “how” a group should do something. 2) Substantive conflict focuses on group members’ differing beliefs, attitudes, values, or ideas related to the purpose or task of the group. A lack of substantive conflict can lead to groupthink. To avoid this, managers need to listen to all viewpoints, try to find common ground, and then weigh and evaluate the information as a group. 3) Interpersonal conflict emerges from personal conflict between individual members of a group. (Small Group Dynamics Chapter 13.3)
|
Important to explain relationship between group cohesion and climate and relationship between conformity and groupthink as well as important types of conflict.
|
|
5 |
Managing Conflict |
|
|
|
|
5 |
Conflict and Group Communication |
John Kelly |
This article focuses on how communication contributes to conflict within groups. Each group member may handle conflict in various ways based on a person’s inclination to act when faced with competition(Aakhus, 2002). Five conflict styles describe individuals engaging in conflict: forcing, smoothing, withdrawing, compromise and collaboration. |
Communication is vital to group cohesion and project success. |
|
6 |
(*)Problem Solving and Decision Making in Groups |
Christina |
Creative Commons’ chapter on problem solving and decision making describes problems faced by groups as having three components- the problem or unwanted situation, the ideal or wanted situation, and the hurdles between unwanted and wanted outcomes. Groups must be aware of these components as they tackle problems. Through the problem-solving lens, the members will address the level of task complexity, potential solutions, importance rating, group knowledge about the problem, and importance of the solution. Although there are a variety of problem-solving approaches, a methodical view is the general recommendation. In essence, define the problem, analyze the problem, produce alternatives, evaluate the alternatives, and then implement the chosen solution. Group problem-solving and decision-making is more challenging and time consuming than individual decision making due to the multiple viewpoints, power dynamics, and varying levels of participation. Brainstorming with certain requirements is suggested- aim for quantity over quality for ideas, do not judge ideas during session, all ideas are welcome, and all contributions are included. It is further suggested in the chapter to begin with a warmup, then have a brainstorming session, followed by clean-up (clarify ideas and eliminate redundancy), then evaluate the results. Decision making techniques include majority rule, minority rule, and consensus. Majority rule is a popular choice where the majority (one-half plus one) must agree before a decision is made. Minority rule gives a designated person the final vote, and they may or may not consider others’ viewpoints. Finally, consensus rule requires everyone to agree. The decision-making process can be affected by personality factors or situation factors. Individual influences based on personal factors and group size, knowledge level, urgency, and group power of decision making all can play a role |
Problem-solving steps and decision-making techniques are an important part of a group communication plan. |
|
6 |
Group Problem Solving |
|
|
|
|
6 |
Groups and Meetings |
|
|
|
|
6 |
Decision Making |
|
|
|
|
6 |
(*)Decision Making and Group Communication |
Ana |
A decision is a choice among two or more alternatives. Decision making refers to the process that groups go through to identify alternative choices and the appropriate way to select an alternative. Individual opinions change as a result of group communication. Group members influence each other through the messages they exchange. If a low-status person in the group raises a good idea, it is likely to be rejected publicly by the group members. Even if the idea is accepted, the low-status member is less likely to get credit for the good idea than the more high-status members of the group. Some groups develop communication patterns that are extremely polite and formal. Other groups embrace open conflict. In these groups, the simple act of agreeing or supporting another person's comments can easily be taken by that person as a challenge. The approaches for decision-making communication include: Functional Approach: suggests the following steps for group decision making (1) define the problem, (2) identify criteria for a good solution, (3) generate alternative solutions, (4) assess alternatives, and (4) choose a solution. These functions define what groups should do. Decision-Emergence Approach: Describe how decisions will emerge groups (1) orient themselves to the task, (2) engage in conflict with each other, (3) develop some standards about making a choice, and (4) create solutions. Theories of Aubrey Fisher and M Scott Poole explain how decisions emerge and how to make decisions. Common Difficulties in Group communication include Groupthink, Polarization, Inferential Errors. The use of a facilitator can help overcome problems (AAKHUS 2002).
|
Important to help support the key role of communications for group decision making and better understanding on approaches for decision making communication |
|
6 |
(*)Majority Rule |
Ana |
The principle of majority rule in elections and decision-making was introduced in medieval Germanic law and canon law as a consequence of failures to make decisions by unanimity. The majority principle has been praised for being the only system that satisfies the following criteria: (1) decisiveness, but only when there are no more than two alternatives (e.g., candidates, parties, or policy proposals) to choose from; (2) anonymity or voter equality; (3) neutrality with respect to issues, so the status quo or the largest group does not have an advantage; and (4) monotonicity, or a positive response to changes in voter preference. However, this model relies on two strong assumptions: a single-dimensional issue space and only two alternatives. Even when majority rule is decisive and maximizes social utility, as in a single-dimensional space with only two alternatives, it can produce a tyranny of the majority, where one group always wins and there is a permanent losing minority (Majority rule 2008). |
Good article to support fact that majority rule is not effective under all scenarios but it might only be effective when there are two proposals for decision making |
|
6 |
Consensus (Communication) |
|
|
|
|
6 |
Problem Solving |
|
|
|
|
6 |
(*)Problem-solving Approaches |
Charise |
Group conflict is an inevitable situation. Each member will bring their own characteristics that bring about this situation. To bring resolution, you must first solve the problem. Problem solving approaches refer to specific methodologies, with their own strategies, tactics, and assumptions (d’Estree, 2009). There are several approach types; mediation, transformative, negotiation, and adjudication to name a few. The mediation approach stresses a focus on identifying underlying interests and reaching integrative agreements(d’Estree, 2009). The transformative approach emphasizes changing the participants and their way of relating. The negotiation approach must influence the other to achieve their own goals. Lastly, in adjudication the parties are supplicants to an authority figure who makes the decision; in some variants such as arbitration, the parties choose to give this authority over to a third party (d’Estree, 2009). .
|
This article was selected to highlight the significance of varying problem solving approaches when confronted with conflict within a group. |
|
6 |
Individual Priming in Virtual Team Decision-Making |
|
|
|
|
6 |
(*)Building More Effective Virtual Teams: An Examination of the Task Variable in Online Group Problem-Solving |
Christina |
Stephen Dundis and Suzanne Benson wrote a literature review focusing on task type pertaining to group problem-solving and its effect on the process. The prevalence of virtual teams and groups has increased the intricacy of team collaboration and the communication quality of those collaborations. Their purpose was to increase efficiency within that process. The authors reviewed six types of task characteristics: interdependence, goal ambiguity, data gathering/distribution, information processing, evaluation demands, and situational under the assumption that as task demands shift, so do the team member exchanges. Dundis and Benson posit that member interaction increases based on task factors and that these conditions affect group problem solving performance and member satisfaction.
|
This could be helpful in considering task type vs interaction level requirements. |
|
6 |
(*)Meeting Management |
Charise |
“Meetings have been considered very important from time immemorial (Reinsborough, 2007, p. 1). “Today meetings are an essential means for achieving the communication necessary for the operation of virtually all organizations, large and small” (Reinsborough, 2007, p. 1) . There are several major types of meetings that occur including staff, project team, process and procedure, quarterly. A staff meeting usually consists of supervisors/managers with their direct reports, to provide updates from senior leadership regarding organizational changes and/or team changes/goals. Project team meetings usually are dedicated to status updates, kick-offs, etc. Process and procedure meetings are usually to communicate new or modified processes and procedures that may affect a particular group directly. Quarterly meetings are usually a large scale meeting to discuss more high level organizational topics with senior and/or executive leadership. To ensure that meetings are effective several pre meeting planning procedures must take place prior to. Including the following: · Determine if a meeting is actually needed · Prepare the agenda and distribute to participants, remembering to provide ample time for review and pre work if applicable · Identify the facilitator and note taker · Ensure the availability of materials/equipment Conducting the meeting in an effective manner is also a critical component. A few guidelines will help in its effectiveness, including: · Starting the meeting on time · Keeping the meeting on track · Follow the agenda and time schedule · Identify and assign tasks · Encourage people to participate · Control the meeting Overall, there are a multitude of guidelines and elements that help support effective meeting management. |
This article was selected to identify the numerous guidelines that can be followed to manage meetings effectively.
|