Strategic Framework

profileccbtta
DBA-Capstone-Project-WIP11-14.docx

Table of Contents

Update the TOC using the Word feature (right click and update). Do not break the headings. The headings are formatted to update the TOC using the edit table feature of Word.

List of Tables x

List of Figures xi

SECTION 1. BUSINESS PROBLEM AND PROJECT SCOPE 1

1.1 Introduction 1

1.2 Capstone Topic 1

1.2.1 Problem of Practice 1

1.3 Purpose of the Project 1

1.3.1. Project Need 1

1.3.2 Project Question(s) 1

1.3.3. Project Justification 1

1.3.4 Project Context: Company or Industry 1

1.3.5 Terms and Definitions 1

1.4 Doctor of Business Project Specifications 1

1.4.1 Importance of the Project 1

1.4.2 Approach for the Project 1

1.5 Summary 1

SECTION 2. LITERATURE REVIEW AND PROJECT PLAN 2

2.1 Introduction 2

2.1.1 Applied Framework 2

2.2 Method for Discovering Literature 2

2.2.1 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria 2

2.2.2 Search Strategy 2

2.3 Review of Scholarly and Practitioner Literature 2

2.3.1 Historic and Current Business Problem Trends 2

2.3.2 Previous Efforts to Address the Problem 2

2.4 Summary of Literature 2

2.5 Recruitment 2

2.6 Project Study Protocol 2

2.6.1 Data Sources 2

2.6.2 Data Collection 2

2.6.3 Data Analysis Plan and Presentation 2

2.6.4 Validity and Reliability/Trustworthiness 2

2.6.5 Ethical Considerations 2

2.7 Overview of the Project Study Plan 3

2.8 Summary and Conclusion 3

SECTION 3. RESULTS, DISUSSION, AND IMPLICATIONS 4

3.1 Introduction 4

3.2 Data Collection Results 4

3.3 Data Analysis 4

3.4 Contribution to Theory, the Literature, and the Practitioner Knowledge Base 4

3.5 Project Application and Recommendations 5

3.6 Conclusion 5

REFERENCES 6

APPENDIX A. APPENDIX TITLE 7

PUBLISHING AGREEMENT 8

STATEMENT OF ORIGINAL WORK 9

List of Tables

Table 1. Table Title [single-spaced and hanging if longer than one line], and add the page number xx

Table 2. Title xx

Note example Table 1 in Section 3. Leave one full blank line between entries.

List of Figures

Figure 1. Figure Title [single-spaced, hanging indent if longer than one line], and add the page number xx

Figure 2. Title xx

Leave one full blank line between entries. Note example Figure 1 in Section 3. Do not remove the section break that follows this paragraph.

vi

SECTION 1. BUSINESS PROBLEM AND PROJECT SCOPE

1.1 Introduction

The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic re-shaped everything from global economies to product categories, pricing, stock availability, and consumer behavior (Mehta et al, 2022). This crisis caused people from all backgrounds to re-evaluate their diets because it highlighted the link between food, health, and immune responses. And although 2020 manifested the shutting down of many businesses due to the strains of COVID-19, particularly small businesses, the loss was not the only experience. Due to the proper ingredients of conditions, devotion, and ingenuity, many new brands, products, trends, interests, and demands in the world of consumer food choices have occurred (Kateman, 2020). No one can deny that 2020 was a crucial, significant year in ways many cannot comprehend yet, especially within the plant-based food space.

Investments in plant-based product manufacturing companies have risen and even after the pandemic hit, some plant-based meat manufacturing companies announced new investments. In 2019, according to the Good Food Institute (GFI), plant-based meat, egg, and dairy companies in the United States received more than $747 million in investments, which caused 2019 to be a record-breaking year (Szejda et al., 2020). However, in the first quarter of 2020, a staggering $741 million was invested in the U.S. plant-based meat, egg, and dairy companies, almost as much as the entirety of 2019 (Szieda et al., 2020). These investments occurred while COVID-19 disrupted global markets. The pandemic exposed the vulnerability of industrial meat, shown with a number of outbreaks in meat-processing plants and empty beef and pork supplies in supermarkets. In addition, with the public health dangers of industrial meat farming, consumers are more concerned about food safety than ever before and are now more in favor of plant-based proteins (Imathiu, 2020). These concerns establish the need to build an innovative growth strategy model that will enhance a broader and more diverse customer base, resulting in increased revenue for plant-based businesses.

According to the Plant-Based Foods Association (Benzaquen, 2021), more than one-third of U.S. adults identify as flexitarians, combining flexible and vegetarian diets. Flexitarians also characterize a vast market opportunity for natural products brands, and with more plant alternatives, healthier effects, which is their goal. To encourage consumers to be open to plant-based foods, numerous organizations take the typical products that are loved and imitate their non-plant-based equivalents (Sirvinskas, 2021). Due to recent technological improvements in ingredients and processing, the end is better tasting and textured products.

Changes occur every year; however, 2020 motivated people to re-evaluate and alter many facets of food systems and their eating habits (Miller, et.al 2021). A meaningful difference can be made with various innovations in plant-based food manufacturing businesses. An opportunity exists for those businesses to have various products to present to their consumer, thus increasing sustainability in the industry. Food manufacturers that endure and grow will be those competent of change. Plant-based manufacturing is a process that leads to the ongoing meeting of consumer needs, thus producing growth (Boukid, 2021).

1.2 Capstone Topic

This project is being completed as part of a Doctor of Business Administration degree with a specialization in strategy and innovation. Innovation strategy models linked to plant-based organizations’ growth strategies will be the focus of the project. Diets higher in plant foods and lower in animal foods were associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a general population (Sotos-Prieto et al., 2018). Many consumer-packaged goods (CPG) companies are discovering how to foresee, grow, and build their strategies by introducing or expanding into plant-based and vegan offerings (Kronthal-Sacco et al., 2019). It is not only an ethical thing to do but also a wise business decision (Kronthal-Sacco et al., 2019). The plant-based and vegan food industry has grown significantly over the last few years (Alcorta et al., 2021). Environmental interest, ethical interests, and health trepidations are primary keys in generating demand for products such as meat substitutes (Herlevi, 2019). Consumers have become more aware of the benefits of a plant-based diet and the adverse effects meat consumption has on the environment (Herlevi).

According to Greenpeace USA (Rotz, 2020), there are growing concerns regarding animal farming, such as breeding cows, pigs, and chickens, as they cause as much greenhouse gas emissions as the combination of cars, trucks, and automobiles. Cattle ranchers have millions of square miles of forests for grazing pastures decimating natural carbon sinks (natural environments that could absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere) (Rotz, 2020). With that said, this project aligns with strategy and innovation as the more CPG companies grow their strategy to include plant-based foods, it can help improve the environment. As a result, consumers will be more attracted due to more and more are looking at organizations that contribute to the enhancing our environment thus positively affecting the bottom line. Legacy CPG companies must dramatically accelerate their product innovation cycles to respond to consumer demands. There is an increasing demand for sustainable food thus leading to the expansion of meat equivalents to satisfy flexitarians and conscious meat-eaters (Fiorentini et al., 2020).

The strategic focus is how manufacturers can build innovative strategic models to attract more diverse consumers aiming to turn towards a plant-based diet. Manufacturing strategies need to focus on immediate foundational needs such as taste, price, and convenience while fulfilling such drivers as health, environmental impact, and animal welfare. The strategy includes the type of architecture manufacturers use to encourage or “nudge” consumers? Nudge strategies include labeling, product placement, ingredients, etc. (Hellstrøm, 2021).

This project aligns with strategy and innovation because for plant-based organizations to successfully address the demands of diverse consumers who are exploring healthier eating options, and they must develop business models and strategies that embrace those on this exploratory journey. Organizations must do it better than their competitors with deep consideration for diverse stakeholders to achieve positive results to their bottom line, which is strongly tied to their sustainability, ethics, and environmental effects.

1.2.1 Problem of Practice

The general business problem is that product innovation challenges are an issue for plant-based food manufacturing industry companies who miss out on increasing their market share from the unfulfilled demands of customers with diverse backgrounds (Aschemann-Witzel et al., 2020). Acceleration of increasing the market share of plant-based manufacturers can contribute to fulfilling these demands as the food industry has a speed problem. Recent findings advise that the policy and market framework is promising however, to be successful in satisfying consumer beliefs, perception and knowledge, an increase in innovations is necessary, in the direction of meat-replacements that are healthy as well as clean label (Aschemann-Witzel et al., 2020). Therefore, manufacturers are already behind schedule to address critical challenges regarding present-day plant-based foods’ taste, texture, and nutrition. Consumers and retailers are presently looking for new and better options (Minchin, 2021). The food companies across the industry will make an intensive push to quicken innovation timelines. Undoubtedly, more partnerships with specialists such as academic research institutions to responsive and experimental start-ups will be needed to develop plant-based food breakthroughs and demonstrate that innovation in the industry can be both revolutionary and fast (Minchin). Disruptive innovation at the grassroots level will play a vital role in the escalating plant-based foods movement as emerging brands redefine dietary staples for the mainstream palate (Watrous, 2021). Manufacturers will need to focus on innovation and strategy to meet the diverse audiences of consumers inquiring about plant-based diets.

The specific business problem is plant-based food manufacturers experience competitive disadvantages because of their inability to innovate food products that attract demand from diverse populations for ethically derived meals resulting in loss of market share and resultant lower revenues (Palumbo et al. 2020). Additionally, plant-based proteins are more expensive than their meat equivalents; as volumes increase, plant-based brands will be open to driving costs down. As a result of such measures, the prices will lower, thus more doors open for plant-based foods to new people. The first clean burger cost more than $300,000 to manufacture in 2013 however, by 2017 were predicted to cost $3.60 per pound (Kateman, 2017). In 2020, Poinski (2020) highlighted that Mainstream Plant-Based Patties, which are made for the freezer section and available in 2-pound packages, have a suggested price of $10.99 per package which translates to about $5.50 per pound. In addition, when it comes to the environment, encouraging more of a decrease in meat-eating will stimulate the planet’s health. Plant-based meats promote changes in the global food system resulting in environmental benefits. There are large benefits from transitioning towards a more plant-based agricultural sector and underscores the need for national policies incentivizing this transition to reduce greenhouse gas emissions agriculturally (Prag, 2020).

Concerns with greenhouse gases because of meat production is causing a dynamic shift in the desires of consumers increasingly wanting plant-based alternatives (Tso et al., 2021). Challenges exist in pleasing sensory properties akin to animal-based meat to promote their acceptance by consumers. Restaurants are creating an impact on consumer behavior by offering a responsible and sustainable nutrition model (Seretny et al., 2021). Taste is a critical feature of the pleasure resulting from food and pleasure is an important influence on food choice. When varieties of tastes are restricted due to restricted eating patterns it serves as a barrier to healthy eating. Additionally, food marketers may support this barrier (Tonya & Grier, 2019).

1.3 Purpose of the Project

The purpose of this qualitative inquiry project is to explore the perspectives of managers within plant-based food manufacturing companies in the southern United States on how to innovate food products that attract demand from diverse populations for ethically derived meals. These diverse populations are those from the African American and Latinx communities (Sterling & Bowen, 2019). Williams et al. (2016) initiated a study to evaluate taste responsiveness in different ethnic groups. These results showed that African Americans and Latinx rated taste sensations higher than non-Hispanic Whites and that these differences were more pronounced in males (Williams et al., 2016).

As a result of COVID-19, plant-based manufacturing will play an essential in the consumer’s new normal. Gray and Jackson (2020) of The Institut de Publique Sondage d’Opinion Secteur (IPSOS), a global research and market firm, interviewed 28,000 people internationally: 79% of those consumers stated they would search for healthier and better products for the environment. In countries, such as Brazil and Mexico, up to 91% of respondents agreed with that statement and in China, the plant-based meat alternative market is expected to grow to $12 billion by 2023, up from $10 billion in 2018 (Gray & Jackson, 2020).

Operating plant-based food manufacturing facilities promotes an opportunity to address the inequality of healthy food options yet contributes to climate change mitigation strategies that positively impact our environment. When a company demonstrates environmental sustainability, it encourages consumers to support them, thus resulting in revenue increase (Jarmul et al., 2019). Specifically, the second-biggest contributor to climate change after fossil fuel raises livestock. Embracing a plant-based diet lessens one carbon footprint and decreases greenhouse gas emissions (Sánchez et al., 2019).

1.3.1. Project Need

Regardless of one’s background, food is a vital part of our daily lives, and at the same time, it is a significant contributor to environmental issues. A need exists for this proposed project as noted by Pieroni et al. (2021) that as the world population and changing diets are expected to impair the negative impact of food production and consumption thus, clever business strategies centered on regulating intake levels must be implemented in the food manufacturing industry to limit need and, therefore, overall resource consumption (Pieroni et al.). As a result, business leaders and manager in plant-based food manufacturing organizations will be able to create innovative strategies that would attract minority populations. (Pieroni et al.).

The plant-based food revolution offers its triple bottom line of addressing the environment, healthcare, and world hunger (Vlissengin, 2018). This aligns with strategy and innovation because business models for growth strategy must focus on the triple bottom line, which is typically defined as profit, people, and the planet. If 2020 showed anything, COVID-19 put more companies under scrutiny for decisions that impact employees, customers, and society. Environmental, social, and governance factors will carry even greater weight in the future than pre-COVID-19 (James, 2020). When plant-based manufacturers focus on the environment, healthcare, and world hunger, they put themselves in a position to enhance their customer base, which would directly affect their triple bottom line of increasing revenue, focusing on people, and positively contributing to the environment (Vlissengin, 2018).

Milton Friedman, an American economist, and statistician was one of the most influential thinkers of the last century; however, his thinking was considered too narrow (Friedman et. Al, 2017). As framed by Friedman, the social responsibility of a business is only to increase its profit within the rules of the game (Ramanna, 2020). To continually increase profit, organizations must not just look at the rules of the game but examine how they are evolving thus their strategies must keep evolving and, in this case, become capable to develop products that attract the taste of diverse populations. Presently, business accountability and efficacy are expressed in stakeholders, not just shareholders, capitalism (James, 2020).

The perspectives of leading plant-based manufacturing companies on the innovation strategies necessary to develop food products that attract diverse populations, will affect the triple bottom line. The plant-based manufacturing companies will need to conduct a feasibility analysis in the product development process and sizing the potential market. On average, there are five factors in determining feasibility; they are for technical, economic, legal, operational, and scheduling known by the acronym TELOS (Leathers, 2020). Traditionally marketing and finance managers will decide whether it is feasible to “go” or “not-go” using consumer insights (Leathers, 2020). These manufacturers producing meat substitutes create sustainability as their consumers are the driving force behind them. Strengthening perceptive and prescriptive validity can lead to growing markets for sustainable products.

1.3.2 Project Question(s)

PQ1:

What are the perspectives of managers within plant-based food manufacturing companies in the southern United States on how to innovate food products that attract demand from diverse populations for ethically derived meals?

1.3.3. Project Justification

The gap in practice is lack of knowledge when it comes to gathering information regarding at the community and organizational levels of minorities (Crimarco, 2019). This qualitative inquiry project will explore managers’ perspectives within plant-based food manufacturing companies and potential innovation strategies necessary to develop food products that attract diverse populations and increase revenue. This is an opportunity to enhance their customer base by addressing the inequality of healthy food options, making them more palatable to diverse populations, which in parallel would contribute to climate change mitigation strategies, thus positively impacting our environment. When a company demonstrates environmental sustainability, it encourages consumers to support them, thus resulting in a significant revenue increase (Jarmul et al., 2019).

The anticipated results of this project are to push the needle forward to help mid-level managers identify opportunities for CPG companies to explore areas where a widened audience of tastes is a primary focus when it comes to producing plant-based foods. Rao (2021) stated that in the United States, 3% of Americans are vegans; however, 8% of Black Americans are strictly vegan or vegetarian. The number of Black Americans that have dabbled in vegan or vegetarian is much higher (Rao, 2021). With that said, CPG organizations could consider tapping into this opportunity as this is over a $74B industry (Rao, 2021). Producing plant-based foods, as mentioned previously, contributes to the sustainability of manufacturers, which is a crucial focus for the future of businesses as millennials and Gen Zers consider sustainability non-negotiable when supporting organizations (Su et al., 2019). The impending climate crisis in their future is causing them to make decisions today based on how production impacts the environment or whether their production is curing or preventing further damage (Su et al., 2019). This is a direct effect on the bottom line. Plant-based manufacturing companies must identify potential opportunities of where they may be able to attract more diverse consumers by focusing on broader tastes, developing the next generation of plant-based proteins to contend with typical animal products throughout their supply chain, and categorizing the most impactful business activities that will grow the bottom line as it focuses on products for the consumer's choice when it comes to taste, price, and convenience.

There was an increased demand for plant-based alternatives during the pandemic due to problems in the North American meat supply chain (Campisi, 2021). During such times, companies saw a four-fold increase in sales for plant-based alternatives and items that they felt boosted their system (Galanakis et al., 2021). This highlighted the need for managers within plant-based food manufacturing companies to focus on developing the innovation strategies necessary to create food products that attract diverse populations, which will result in increased revenue (Galanakis et al., 2021). Gaps that exist are cultural barriers, objections from incumbent meat companies, and the risk of an incident that affects consumer confidence. Cultural barriers are related to meat's taste and texture, which may be limited to specific groups. Incumbencies exist with cattle farmers who potentially can stand in the way of the alternative protein avenue, especially in the U.S. (Newton & Blaustein-Rejto, 2021). Risk gaps include if a plant-based has some incident that would warrant a recall, that could cause customers to be cautious of these alternatives.

1.3.4 Project Context: Company or Industry

The project will explore managers' perspectives within plant-based food manufacturing companies within the southern region of the United States as to innovation strategies that could be used to develop food products that attract minority populations. This is an opportunity to address the inequality of healthy food options. The plant-based food manufacturers pose opportunities for triple bottom line, solving problems with the environment, healthcare, and world hunger (Vlissengin, 2018). When a company demonstrates environmental sustainability, it encourages consumers to support them, improving financial performance, thus resulting in revenue increase (Xie et al., 2019).

Circumstances are changing as there is an increase in consumer demand for sustainable and plant-based products, thus pressuring prominent food manufacturers to be increasingly alert to acclimate their portfolios and bring to market innovative new products (Scully, 2018). According to research from Innova Market Insights (2022), there was an increase of 62% Compound Annual Growth Rate globally between 2013 and 2017 regarding new food and beverage products featuring plant-based claims. As consumer interests continue to grow in health, sustainability, and ethics, this urges plant-derived ingredients and products into high esteem (Scully, 2018). The results of heightened esteem behooves managers in plant-based food manufacturing companies to address the rising popularity of soy and plant-based products. There is an increasing focus of market participants in R&D, which will impact the market growth, resulting in new products and improvements in the existing product lines (Song et al., 2020). The high demand encourages manufacturers to develop various forms of for high-protein products that can attract consumers' attention (Malecki et al., 2021).

Millennials and Gen Z are the driving force behind the plant-based movement (Ditlevsen et al, 2020). Although taste and texture are essential, sustainability is a crucial motivator behind their choice (Ditlevsen et al., 2020). A revenue management survey regarding plant-based meat alternatives confirms that 48% of participants said their primary motivation for consuming plant-based meats was to help preserve the environment (Ditlevsen et al., 2020). Many of those participants were millennials and Gen Z 55%, to be exact (“The Impact of Plant-based Foods on Restaurant Recovery , 2021).

To cater to the sudden growth in demand, many plant-based companies are starting to change their strategies. Various plant-based alternative product manufacturers are increasing their production, discounting plant-based alternative products to appeal to more consumers, expanding into more stores and neighborhoods while partnering with additional stakeholders (“The Impact of Plant-based Foods on Restaurant Recovery , 2021). Legacy companies are also riding this proverbial train as they have joint venture partnerships offering plant-based manufacturers (Best, 2018). Their products are plant-based made to address a variety of dietary needs. Legacy companies are also working with organizations internationally to provide additional plant-based products (Best, 2018).

1.3.5 Terms and Definitions

Ethnic. Ethnic is a group of people who differ in race or color or in national, religious, or cultural origin from the dominant group — often the majority population — of the country in which they live (Hamer et al., 2018).

Flexitarian. Flexitarian can be defined as a combination of the words "flexible" and "vegetarian." It's a cross between full vegan and vegetarian with the ability to

enjoy animal products every so often (Dagevos, 2021)

Plant-based Food. A plant-based diet consists of all minimally processed fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts and seeds, herbs, and spices and excludes all animal products, including red meat, poultry, fish, eggs, and dairy products (Ostfeld, 2017).

1.4 Doctor of Business Project Specifications

This Doctor of Business project specifications includes the importance of the product innovation challenges within the plant-based food manufacturing industry and the approach needed to address them. The project's significance identifies the problems, issues, and adversity faced in minority communities. The approach for the project is to research and identify creative, innovative ways that improve the taste and affordability to embrace minority communities.

Plant-based manufacturers must focus on creating strategies to adapt to their ever-changing industries to solve social, health, or economic challenges. Focusing on innovation strategy models linked to plant-based organizations' growth strategy will increase profit by reducing costs and rising demand. The purpose of this project is to explore the perspectives of managers within plant-based food manufacturing companies in the southern region of the United States as to the innovation strategies necessary to develop food products that attract diverse populations and increase revenue.

Their innovation strategy must include an appropriate project technique, using constructive interviews as it is the most flexible of the various experimental techniques, encompassing a variety of accepted methods and structures. Continually ensuring the interviews conducted are bias-free, open-ended approach and staying alert to potential sources of error. This usually involves awareness of bias and deep sensitivity to the experience in question.

1.4.1 Importance of the Project

This project is significant and important to plant-based manufacturing companies as they could benefit from adding diverse populations to their customer base thus directly impacting revenue. As millennials and Gen Zers of diverse backgrounds are such a large portion of consumers of plant-based foods, it should be noted that they are not willing to support organizations whose business strategy models are not sustainable (Su et al., 2019). Sustainability and plant-based manufacturing go hand in hand (OECD, 2020). Plant-based food manufacturing facilities promotes an opportunity to address sustainability issues as well as help correct the issue of inequality of healthy food options and develop food products that attract the tastes of diverse populations which trickles down to increased revenue (OECD). Motivating factors are changing rapidly. From recent surveys such as IPSOS, consumers are now making choices that are good for them and sustainable for the planet and are willing to pay for it (Mortimer, 2020). This makes plant-based alternatives a viable solution to their wishes.

Another driver in the plant-based arena is sustainability. Consumers now more than ever have a high interest in where their food comes from and its ethical and environmental impact. Sustainability is a critical component of branding strategies the world over. When it comes to branding, many companies somehow tie in the better for people and the planet's idea (Kelly, 2020).

Millennials and Gen Z are the driving force behind the plant-based movement (Su et al., 2019). To attract diverse populations for ethnically derived meals, taste and texture are essential. An examination is necessary of the need for an urban food economy that addresses food access disparities, reduces pressure on the urban infrastructure, and improves the sustainability and resilience of food systems in high-population areas. A solution would be to come up with innovative food strategies from plant-based food manufacturers and becoming able to develop food products that attract the taste of diverse populations. Inarguably, this need was intensified universally during the COVID-19 pandemic (Kateman, 2020). As food supply chains collapsed and migrant workers suffered excessive infection rates and mobility restrictions, the vulnerability of the highly centralized, highly global food system became plainly evident (Stuiver & O’hara, 2021).

Plant-based launches in bakeries & patisseries are on a consistent increase. In the past ten years, the number of product launches in bakeries & patisseries has consistently grown 33% year on year, with patisserie products at 21% (GFI , 2021). The plant-based food market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 11.9% from 2020 to 2027 to reach $74.2 billion by 2027 (GFI , 2021). This is yet another factor for plant-based organizations to focus on innovations in their growth strategy to enhance their customer base, thus increasing revenue.

Practitioners must understand that the best strategy for accelerating consumer acceptance which would be first to understand their consumers' foundational and ever-changing motivations for food choice, as well as the different forces of these influences by consumer segment (Szejda et al., 2020). After the identifying of the target consumer segments, a unified strategy will include developing a product to meet these segments' unique needs and wants; structuring consumer purchasing environments to nudge toward specific, desired selection; and designing and disseminating messages to influence consumer behavior (Szejda et al., 2020). When it comes to barriers to plant-based manufacturing reducing meat consumption are social norms and general enjoyment of eating conventional meat, health concerns (mainly about protein and other nutrients), lack of familiarity with alternative ways of eating, fear of new foods, and unwillingness to change dietary habits.

1.4.2 Approach for the Project

The project technique most appropriate for conducting this project is a qualitative inquiry. This project will use semi structured interviews to explore managers' perspectives within plant-based food manufacturing companies on the innovation strategies necessary to develop food products that attract diverse populations.

Qualitative research can assist a researcher in getting into the thoughts and feelings of their participants, which can facilitate the enhancement of an understanding of why people credit their experiences (Bowers, 2019). This approach will require reflection on the researcher's part, both before and during the research process, to provide background and insight for readers.

The project will use interview questions for this process. Interviews will be conducted with individuals to obtain detailed data. The questions may be structured, semi structured, or in-depth. During structured interviews, questions are scripted, and answers are limited. Semi-structured interviews have an interview guide with open-ended questions, but a reduced list of focuses limits solutions; thus, free examination of an issue may be limited (Ahlin, 2019). The goal is to have in-depth interviews. The unique factor between approaches is open- or close-ended questions. The researcher can ask very general questions during in-depth interviews to stimulate boundless exploration of an issue. Follow-up questions are impulsively created based on the responses of each participant. This indicates that in-depth interviews are the best approach in qualitative research as the data is detailed, comprehensive, more representative of the trend, and less biased. The interviews will be conducted over Zoom, thus recorded and transcribed. Every effort will be taken to ensure reliability, validity, and relevance. Thorough notetaking will assist in presenting an accurate description of the circumstances and capture the complexity of the interrelationships. Legitimacy involves guesstimating actual trends, and richer data increases this probability.

The participants will include mid-level managers in plant-based organizations and organizations with a plant-based segment. One-on-one interviews will be conducted, one of the most usual qualitative data-collection methods and an excellent approach to gathering more definitive information.

Clarke and Braun (2017) described the phases of thematic analysis as a systematic way of seeing and processing qualitative information using “coding”. There are six phases. Phase one is data familiarization which involves transcribing the data, reading it multiple times, and jotting down the initial thoughts. Phase two is generating initial code by coding interesting characters of the data in which can be a small phrase or keyword denoting a specific idea. Phase three searches for themes across the data which can be done by collating codes into possible themes, assembling relevant data to each potential theme. Phase four is reviewing themes where one checks if the themes work in relation to the coded. The fifth phase is defining and naming the themes which is a written detail of each theme. During the final phase a report is produced where there is an intertwine of the analytic narrative and data extracts to tell a story.

Various barriers may exist when it comes to conducting qualitative inquiry research. Some may lack knowledge, lack of education, attitudes and beliefs, behaviors, taste preferences, and perhaps even peer influence. Developing a contingency plan will be necessary. A risk evaluation to grasp which potential risk has a maximum likelihood of happening can significantly impact the project.

1.5 Summary

As a result of COVID-19, people are focusing on their eating habits. This is an opportunity for manufacturers to take advantage and evaluate how they can capitalize from it. The CPG industry has faced unprecedented demand from manufacturers and consumers, particularly for some products such as meat substitutions and plant-based milk (Bombe, 2020).

This capstone project will focus on innovation strategy models linked to plant-based organizations' growth strategies. The general business problem is product innovation challenges continue to be an issue for plant-based food manufacturing industry companies. Perhaps, if said companies can convert their innovativeness into by adapting and expanding their consumer base to a more diverse one, the result could be a better financial performance (Wang & Dass, 2017). The specific business problem is plant-based food manufacturers experience competitive disadvantages because of their inability to innovate food products that attract diverse populations resulting in lower revenue (Palumbo et al., 2020).

Additionally, plant-based proteins are more expensive than their meat equivalents; as volumes increase, plant-based brands will be open to driving costs down, causing a tipping point that the lower the prices, the more doors open for plant-based foods to new people (Curtain & Grafenauer, 2019). As of mid-2020, new buyers of plant-based products, customers who did not purchase plant-based products in the 52 weeks preceding the start of COVID-19 and who came back to make another plant-based purchase in May 2020, are the shoppers they have the most significant opportunity to convert. One of those demographics was African Americans (Greifenberg, 2021).

Studies have shown that sustainability is vital for strategy and innovation (Ahmad & Wong, 2018). It is still essential to focus more on plant and process level assessments to achieve the triple bottom line objectives. As the environment is a priority focus for many consumers, organizations must focus on how their manufacturing plants are affecting the environment to continue to attract consumers who look at the general practices of organizations today, thus resulting in an effect on their bottom line.

Circumstances are changing as therein is an increase in consumer demand for sustainable and plant-based products, thus pressuring prominent food manufacturers to be increasingly alert to acclimate their portfolios and bring to market innovative new products (Scully, 2019).

The remaining sections of this project detail the literature review and project plan in section two and the results, discussion, and implications in section three. Following the introduction, two include the method for discovering the literature, a review of scholarly and practitioner literature, a summary of the literature, recruitment, project study protocol, an overview of the project study plan, and the summary and conclusion.

Section three includes the introduction, the data collection results, data analysis, a review of the contribution to theory, the literature, the practitioner knowledge base, and the project application and recommendations. The project completes with references and appendices.

[ Note to learners: the project’s sections 1 to 1.5 will be revised into past tense after you conduct the study and write Section 3. Delete these instructions.].

SECTION 2. LITERATURE REVIEW AND PROJECT PLAN

2.1 Introduction

2.1.1 Applied Framework

2.2 Method for Discovering Literature

2.2.1 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

2.2.2 Search Strategy

2.3 Review of Scholarly and Practitioner Literature

2.3.1 Historic and Current Business Problem Trends

2.3.1.1 Potential Additional Section Header. [Text starts here].

2.3.1.1.2 Potential Additional Section Header. [Text starts here].

2.3.2 Previous Efforts to Address the Problem

2.4 Summary of Literature

2.5 Recruitment

2.6 Project Study Protocol

2.6.1 Data Sources

2.6.1.1 Preliminary Sources of Data Expected.

2.6.1.2 Instrumentation and Data Collection Tools.

2.6.2 Data Collection

2.6.3 Data Analysis Plan and Presentation

2.6.4 Validity and Reliability/Trustworthiness

2.6.5 Ethical Considerations

2.7 Overview of the Project Study Plan

2.8 Summary and Conclusion

[ Note to learners: The project’s sections 1 to 2.13 will be revised into past tense after you conduct the study and write Section 3.].

SECTION 3. RESULTS, DISUSSION, AND IMPLICATIONS

3.1 Introduction

3.2 Data Collection Results

3.3 Data Analysis

Table 1. Example of a Capella APA Table

Items

Counts

Item 1

Item 2

Item 3

4

6

21

Note. This general note describes some important items in this table. Delete this before using the template.

3.4 Contribution to Theory, the Literature, and the Practitioner Knowledge Base

Figure 1. Example of a Capella APA Figure

Note. This figure, created by M. Preiksaitis (2021), is open sourced and may be used by others, without permission. Typically, this note would include the copyright and permissions information for a figure, unless created by the research author, in which case, the note should state that the work was research author created. See APA 7.0, Rule 7.7 (p. 198) and all other pertinent rules for instructions on how to attribute unoriginal, copied figures. Delete this before using the template.

3.5 Project Application and Recommendations

3.6 Conclusion

REFERENCES

Ahlin, E. (2019, January 2). Semi-structured interviews with expert practitioners: Their validity and significant contribution to Translational Research. Sage Research Methods. https://methods.sagepub.com/case/semi-structured-interviews-with-expert-practitioners-translational-research

Ahmad, S., & Wong, K. Y. (2018, November 29). Sustainability assessment in the manufacturing industry: a review of recent studies. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/BIJ-08-2017-0214/full/html.

Alcorta, A., Porta, A., Tárrega, A., Alvarez, M. D., &; Vaquero, M. P. (2021). Foods | free full-text | foods for plant-based ... - MDPI. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/2/293

Aschemann-Witzel, J., Futtrup Gantriis, R., Fraga, P., & Perez-Cueto, F. J. A. (2020, July 13). Plant-based food and protein trend from a business perspective: Markets, consumers, and the challenges and opportunities in the future. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32654499/.

Benzaquen, D. (2021, December 21). Plant-Based Foods Association. https://www.plantbasedfoods.org/.

Best, D. (2018, Aug 06). "I've never seen this pace of change in the industry" - Nestle US strategy chief on trying to grow again in its largest market. Just - Food Global News http://library.capella.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fwire-feeds%2Five-never-seen-this-pace-change-industry-nestle%2Fdocview%2F2083709589%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D27965

Bombe, K. (2020, August 13). Plant-based Food Market Worth $74.2 Billion by 2027, Growing at a CAGR of 11.9% from 2020- Pre and Post COVID-19 Market Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecasts by Meticulous Research®. GlobeNewswire News Room. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2020/08/13/2077824/0/en/Plant-based-Food-Market-Worth-74-2-Billion-by-2027-Growing-at-a-CAGR-of-11-9-from-2020-Pre-and-Post-COVID-19-Market-Opportunity-Analysis-and-Industry-Forecasts-by-Meticulous-Resear.html.

Boukid. (2021). Plant-based meat analogues: from niche to mainstream. European Food Research & Technology, 247(2), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-020-03630-9

Bowers. (2019). Pre-registering Qualitative Research: Benefits, Unintended Consequences, and Unanswered Questions. Innovation in Aging., 3(Supplement_1), S400–S400. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.1483

Campisi, V. (2021, March 17). How CPG Companies are Strategizing to Thrive During Pandemic. The Food Institute. https://foodinstitute.com/focus/how-cpg-companies-are-strategizing-to-thrive-during-pandemic/.

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613.

Crimarco, A. (2019, July). The plant-based and soul-full study (pass): Examining how ... https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6356&context=etd.

Curtain, F., & Grafenauer, S. (2019). Plant-Based Meat Substitutes in the Flexitarian Age: An Audit of Products on Supermarket Shelves.  Nutrients, 11(11), 2603. http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.3390/nu11112603

Ditlevsen, K., Denver, S., Christensen, T., & Lassen, J. (2020). A taste for locally produced food - values, opinions, and sociodemographic differences among ‘organic’ and ‘conventional’ consumers. Appetite, 147, 104544-104544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104544

Ferrer, B. (2020, October 20). Transparency triumphs in Innova Market Insights' Top Trends for 2021. foodingredientsfirst.com/. https://www.foodingredientsfirst.com/news/transparency-triumphs-in-innova-market-insights-top-trends-for-2021.html.

Fiorentini, M., Kinchla, A. J., & Nolden, A. A. (2020, September 20). Role of sensory evaluation in consumer acceptance of plant-based meat analogs and meat extenders: A scoping review. Foods (Basel, Switzerland). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32971743/.

Friedman, M., Leeson, R., Palm, C. G., & Taylor, J. B. (2017). Milton friedman on freedom: Selections from the collected works of milton friedman. Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.library.capella.edu/lib/capella/detail.action?docID=4824999.

Galanakis, C. M., Rizou, M., Aldawoud, T. M. S., Ucak, I., &; Rowan, N. J. (2021, February 10). Innovations and technology disruptions in the food sector within the covid-19 pandemic and post-lockdown era. Trends in Food Science &; Technology. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924224421001035.

Gray, E., & Jackson, C. (2020, April). Earth day 2020 - ipsos. IPSOS.com. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-04/earth-day-2020-ipsos.pdf

Griefenberg, P. K. (2021). The Potential for Plant-Based Lifestyles to Address Oppression and the Ideological and Systemic Obstacles to Widespread Veganism (Order No. 28493041). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2543402039). http://library.capella.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fdissertations-theses%2Fpotential-plant-based-lifestyles-address%2Fdocview%2F2543402039%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D27965

Hamer, K., McFarland, S., Łużniak-Piecha, M., Jułkowski, T., Czarnecka, B., Golińska, A., & Manrique Cadena, L. (2018, December 21). What is an “ethnic group” in ordinary ... - sage journals. Sage Journals. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1069397118816939

Hellstrøm, M. C. L. (2021, January 1). Nudging: Strategies and sustainability-label signifiers to influence potential sustainable food consumer behavior. NTNU Open. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2776825?locale-attribute=no.

Herlevi, E. (2019, December 1). Brand Development of Vegan Food Brands: Identity, values, Consumer–Brand Identification and the effects of culture on international brand development. Osuva. https://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/10024/10259.

Imathiu, S. (2019, November 21). Benefits and food safety concerns associated with consumption of edible insects. NFS Journal. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235236461930046X

Innova Market Insights. (2022, January 21). Transparency claims boost NPD appeal. .foodingredientsfirst.com/. https://www.foodingredientsfirst.com/ingredient-focus/transparency-claims-boost-npd-appeal.html

Insights, P. M. (2021, January 19). Global Microalgae Food Market – Growing Health Awareness, Rising Sustainability towards Plant-based foods driving market growth - by PMI. GlobeNewswire News Room. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/01/19/2160906/0/en/Global-Microalgae-Food-Market-Growing-Health-Awareness-Rising-Sustainability-towards-Plant-based-foods-driving-market-growth-by-PMI.html.

James, K. (2020). COVID-19 and People, Planet and Profit: Where to from here? ERM. https://www.erm.com/insights/covid-19-and-people-planet-and-profit-where-to-from-here/.

Jarmul, S., Liew, Z., Haines, A., & Scheelbeek, P. (2019, December 17). Climate change mitigation in food systems: the environmental and health impacts of shifting towards sustainable diets, a systematic review protocol. Wellcome open research. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029755/.

Kateman, B. (2017, 17 June). Mosa Meat: All Beef No Butcher. The Good Food Institute. https://www.gfi.org/mosa-meat-all-beef-no-butcher

Kateman, B. (2020, December 21). The Top 10 Trends In Plant-Based Food In 2020-And Where We're Going In 2021. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/briankateman/2020/12/21/the-top-10-trends-in-plant-based-food-in-2020-and-where-were-going-in-2021/?sh=73648d983729.

Kelly, N. (2020, September 10). Name Your Brand with a Global Audience in Mind. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/09/name-your-brand-with-a-global-audience-in-mind.

Kronthal-Sacco, R., Whelan, T., Van Holt, T., & Atz, U. (2019, October 29). Sustainable purchasing patterns and consumer responsiveness to sustainability marketing. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3465669

Kuhns, A., & Saksena, M. (2017). Food purchase decisions of millennial households compared to other generations. USDA ERS. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=86400

Leathers, L. (2020, July 28). Determining Market Feasibility for New Products Mindspot Research. Mindspot Research. https://mindspotresearch.com/blog/determining-market-feasibility-for-new-products/.

Małecki, J., Muszyński, S., & Sołowiej, B.,G. (2021). Proteins in food Systems—Bionanomaterials, conventional and unconventional sources, functional properties, and development opportunities. Polymers, 13(15), 2506. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13152506

Miller, K. B., Eckberg, J. O., Decker, E. A., &; Marinangeli, C. P. F. (2021, August 10). Role of food industry in promoting healthy and sustainable diets. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/8/2740

Minchin, J. (2021, January 7). Seven challenges and trends the food industry can expect in 2021. New Food Magazine. https://www.newfoodmagazine.com/article/129788/trends-and-challenges-2021/.

Mortimer, Gary (2020) Climate explained: are consumers willing to pay more for climate-friendly products? The Conversation, 30 September 2020. [Article] https://theconversation.com/climate-explained-are-consumers-willing-to-pay-more-for-climate-friendly-products-146757

Newton, P., &; Blaustein-Rejto, D. (2021, January 283). Social and economic opportunities and challenges of plant-based and cultured meat for rural producers in the US. Frontiers. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.624270/full

OECD About sustainable manufacturing and the toolkit. OECD. (2020). https://www.oecd.org/innovation/green/toolkit/aboutsustainablemanufacturingandthetoolkit.htm.

Ostfeld, R. J. (2017, May). Definition of a plant-based diet and overview of this special issue. Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5466934/

Palumbo, E., Soust-Verdaguer, B., Llatas, C., & Traverso, M. (2020, August 26). How to Obtain Accurate Environmental Impacts at Early Design Stages in BIM When Using Environmental Product Declaration. A Method to Support Decision-Making. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6927.

Pieroni, M. P. P., McAloone, T. C., Borgianni, Y., Maccioni, L., & Pigosso, D. C. A. (2021, January 21). An expert system for circular economy business modeling: advising manufacturing companies in decoupling value creation from resource consumption. Sustainable Production and Consumption. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352550921000233.

Poinski, M. (2020). Before the Butcher launches plant-based burgers costing the same as beef. Food Dive, http://library.capella.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Ftrade-journals%2Fbefore-butcher-launches-plant-based-burgers%2Fdocview%2F2450680483%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D27965

Prag, A. A. (2020). Transition from Animal-Based to Plant-Based Food Production to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture—The Case of Denmark.  Sustainability, 12(19), 8228. http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.3390/su12198228

Ramanna. (2020). Friedman at 50: Is It Still the Social Responsibility of Business to Increase Profits? California Management Review., 62(3), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620914994.

Rao, V. (2021, February 26). Black and vegan: Why so many black Americans are embracing the plant-based lifeV. TODAY.com. https://www.today.com/food/black-vegan-why-so-many-black-americans-are-embracing-plant-t209743.

Retail sales data: Plant-based meat, eggs, dairy: GFI. The Good Food Institute. (2021, July 30). https://gfi.org/marketresearch/.

Revenue Management Solutions, 2021, March 9 The impact of plant-based foods on restaurant recovery. Revenue Management Solutions. (2021, March 9). https://www.revenuemanage.com/en/insights/the-impact-of-plant-based-foods-on-restaurant-recovery/.

Rotz, A. (2020, 7 28). Environmental Sustainability of Livestock Production.  Meat and Muscle Biology 4(2) https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/mmb/article/id/11103/

Sánchez, E., Langué, G., & McCarthy, J. (2019, May). 9 Reasons Why Plant-Based Meat Is the Food of the Future. Global Citizen. https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/plant-based-meats-trends-list/?template=next.

Scully, J. (2018, July 9). Plant-based product claims rise by 62% between 2013 and 2017. https://www.foodbev.com/news/plant-based-product-claims-rise-by-62-between-2013-and-2017.

Seretny, M., Gaur, D., Sobczyk, K., &; Kaabour, M. (2021, January 1). Creating a new, sustainable mindset through responsible consumption: A case study of the international chain of Sustainable Restaurants. Foundations of Management. https://www.sciendo.com/article/10.2478/fman-2021-0004

Sirvinskas, E. A. (2021). Understanding Social Change Through Plant-Based Eating (Order No. 28413086). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2543473915). http://library.capella.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fdissertations-theses%2Funderstanding-social-change-through-plant-based%2Fdocview%2F2543473915%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D27965

Song, M., Wang, S., &; Zhang, H. (2020, March 3). Could environmental regulation and R&;D tax incentives affect Green Product Innovation? Journal of Cleaner Production. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652620308969

Sterling, S. R., & Bowen, S.-A. (2019). The potential for plant-based diets to promote health among blacks living in the United States. Nutrients, 11(12), 2915. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11122915

Sotos-Prieto, M., & Mattei, J. (2018). Mediterranean Diet and Cardiometabolic Diseases in Racial/Ethnic Minority Populations in the United States.  Nutrients, 10(3), 352.  http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.3390/nu10030352

Stuiver, M., & O’hara, S. (2021, August 13). Food connects Washington DC in 2050-A vision for urban food systems as the centerpieces of a circular economy. Research@WUR. https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/food-connects-washington-dc-in-2050a-vision-for-urban-food-system

Su, C.-H. (J., Tsai, C.-H. (K., Chen, M.-H., &; Lv, W. Q. (2019, June 30). U.S. Sustainable Food Market Generation Z consumer segments. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3607/htm

Szejda, K., Urbanovich, T., & Wilks, M. (2020, February). Accelerating Consumer Adoption of Plant-Based Meat: An Evidence-Based Guide for Effective Practice. The Good Food Institute. https://gfi.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/NO-HYPERLINKED-REFERENCES-FINAL-COMBINED-accelerating-consumer-adoption-of-plant-based-meat.pdf

The Good Food Institute. (2019). Business Case for Plant-Based Foods. Good Food Scorecard. http://goodfoodscorecard.org/business-case/.

Tonya, W. B., & Grier, S. (2019). Restricted pleasure for healthy eating and food well-being. Qualitative Market Research, 22(4), 557-569. http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.1108/QMR-11-2018-0131

Tso, R.; Lim, A.J.; Forde, C.G. A Critical Appraisal of the Evidence Supporting Consumer Motivations for Alternative Proteins. Foods 2021, 10, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010024

Revenue Management Solutions, 2021, March 9 The impact of plant-based foods on restaurant recovery. Revenue Management Solutions. (2021, March 9). https://www.revenuemanage.com/en/insights/the-impact-of-plant-based-foods-on-restaurant-recovery/.

Vlissengin, R. van. (2018, November 14). The Real Story Of The Triple Bottom Line (NASDAQ:BYND). SeekingAlpha. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4224252-real-story-of-triple-bottom-line.

Wang, X., & Dass, M. (2017). Building innovation capability: The role of top management innovativeness and relative-exploration orientation. Journal of Business Research, 76(21), i-ii. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1975.9728660

Watrous, M. (2021, February 23). Food Entrepreneur: The plant-based revolutionaries. Food Business News RSS. https://www.foodbusinessnews.net/articles/15574-food-entrepreneur-the-plant-based-revolutionaries.

White, S. K. (2021, June 18). Plant-based meat substitutes: Understanding consumers' motivators, barriers, knowledge and consumption practices. UC Library. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/103035

Williams, J. A., Bartoshuk, L. M., Fillingim, R. B., & Dotson, C. D. (2016). Exploring ethnic differences in taste perception. Chemical Senses, 41(5), 449-456. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjw021

APPENDIX A. APPENDIX TITLE

Please include all instruments, permissions, and other important documentation here [as determined by your instructor, mentor, or committee members] until final Dean review, at which time they should be removed. Learner-created interview protocols, surveys, or other original documentation should remain for Dean review and final submission.

PUBLISHING AGREEMENT

This Agreement is between the author (Author) and Capella University. Under this Agreement, in consideration for the opportunity to have his/her capstone project published on a Capella website, Author grants Capella certain rights to preserve, archive and publish the Author’s doctoral capstone (the Work), abstract, and index terms.

License for Inclusion in Capella Websites and Publications

Grant of Rights. Author hereby grants to Capella the non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable worldwide right to reproduce, distribute, display and transmit the Work (in whole or in part) in such tangible and electronic formats as may be in existence now or developed in the future. Such forms include, but are not limited to, Capella University websites, where the Work may be made available for free download. Author further grants to Capella the right to include the abstract, bibliography and other metadata in Capella University’s doctoral capstone repository and any successor or related index and/or finding products or services. The rights granted by Author automatically include (1) the right to allow for distribution of the Work, in whole or in part, by agents and distributors, and (2) the right to make the Abstract, bibliographic data and any meta data associated with the Work available to search engines.

Removal of Work from the Program. Capella may elect not to distribute the Work if it believes that all necessary rights of third parties have not been secured. In addition, if Author's degree is rescinded or found to be in violation of Capella University’s Research Misconduct Policy or other University policies, Capella may expunge the Work from publication. Capella may also elect not to distribute the work in a manner supported by other Capella University policies.

Rights Verification. Author represents and warrants that Author is the copyright holder of the Work and has obtained all necessary rights to permit Capella to reproduce and distribute third party materials contained in any part of the Work, including all necessary licenses for any non-public, third party software necessary to access, display, and run or print the Work. Author is solely responsible and will indemnify and defend Capella for any third party claims related to the Work as submitted for publication, including but not limited to claims alleging the Work violates a third party’s intellectual property rights.

STATEMENT OF ORIGINAL WORK

Capella University’s Academic Honesty Policy ( 3.01.01) holds learners accountable for the integrity of work they submit, which includes but is not limited to discussion postings, assignments, comprehensive exams, and the dissertation or capstone project.

Established in the Policy are the expectations for original work, rationale for the policy, definition of terms that pertain to academic honesty and original work, and disciplinary consequences of academic dishonesty. Also stated in the Policy is the expectation that learners will follow APA rules for citing another person’s ideas or works.

The following standards for original work and definition of plagiarism are discussed in the Policy:

Learners are expected to be the sole authors of their work and to acknowledge the authorship of others’ work through proper citation and reference. Use of another person’s ideas, including another learner’s, without proper reference or citation constitutes plagiarism and academic dishonesty and is prohibited conduct. (p. 1)

Plagiarism is one example of academic dishonesty. Plagiarism is presenting someone else’s ideas or work as your own. Plagiarism also includes copying verbatim or rephrasing ideas without properly acknowledging the source by author, date, and publication medium. (p. 2)

Capella University’s Research Misconduct Policy ( 3.03.06) holds learners accountable for research integrity. What constitutes research misconduct is discussed in the Policy:

Research misconduct includes but is not limited to falsification, fabrication, plagiarism, misappropriation, or other practices that seriously deviate from those that are commonly accepted within the academic community for proposing, conducting, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. (p. 1)

Learners failing to abide by these policies are subject to consequences, including but not limited to dismissal or revocation of the degree.

Acknowledgments:

I have read, understand and agree to this Capella Publishing Agreement. I have read, understood, and abided by Capella University’s Academic Honesty Policy ( 3.01.01) and Research Misconduct Policy ( 3.03.06).

I attest that this dissertation or capstone project is my own work. Where I have used the ideas or words of others, I have paraphrased, summarized, or used direct quotes following the guidelines set forth in the APA Publication Manual.

(Type full Name)

Signature Date

(If signed by typing your name, you agree that this is your signature).

image1.png