Analysis
Chi_Sq_DATA
| Employee_Ref | Promoted | Management Training Program | ||||
| 1 | No | No | ||||
| 2 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 3 | No | No | ||||
| 4 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 5 | No | No | ||||
| 6 | No | No | ||||
| 7 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 8 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 9 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 10 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 11 | No | No | ||||
| 12 | No | No | ||||
| 13 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 14 | No | No | ||||
| 15 | Yes | No | ||||
| 16 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 17 | No | Yes | ||||
| 18 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 19 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 20 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 21 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 22 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 23 | No | No | ||||
| 24 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 25 | No | No | ||||
| 26 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 27 | No | No | ||||
| 28 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 29 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 30 | No | No | ||||
| 31 | No | No | ||||
| 32 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 33 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 34 | No | No | ||||
| 35 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 36 | No | No | ||||
| 37 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 38 | No | No | ||||
| 39 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 40 | No | No | ||||
| 41 | No | No | ||||
| 42 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 43 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 44 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 45 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 46 | Yes | No | ||||
| 47 | Yes | No | ||||
| 48 | No | No | ||||
| 49 | Yes | No | ||||
| 50 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 51 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 52 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 53 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 54 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 55 | No | No | ||||
| 56 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 57 | Yes | No | ||||
| 58 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 59 | No | No | ||||
| 60 | No | No | ||||
| 61 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 62 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 63 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 64 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 65 | No | No | ||||
| 66 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 67 | No | No | ||||
| 68 | No | No | ||||
| 69 | No | No | ||||
| 70 | No | No | ||||
| 71 | No | No | ||||
| 72 | No | No | ||||
| 73 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 74 | No | Yes | ||||
| 75 | No | No | ||||
| 76 | No | No | ||||
| 77 | No | No | ||||
| 78 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 79 | No | Yes | ||||
| 80 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 81 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 82 | No | Yes | ||||
| 83 | No | No | ||||
| 84 | No | No | ||||
| 85 | No | No | ||||
| 86 | No | No | ||||
| 87 | No | No | ||||
| 88 | No | No | ||||
| 89 | No | No | ||||
| 90 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 91 | No | No | ||||
| 92 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 93 | No | Yes | ||||
| 94 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 95 | Yes | No | ||||
| 96 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 97 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 98 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 99 | No | No | ||||
| 100 | No | No | ||||
| 101 | No | No | ||||
| 102 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 103 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 104 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 105 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 106 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 107 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 108 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 109 | No | No | ||||
| 110 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 111 | No | No | ||||
| 112 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 113 | No | No | ||||
| 114 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 115 | Yes | No | ||||
| 116 | No | No | ||||
| 117 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 118 | No | No | ||||
| 119 | No | No | ||||
| 120 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 121 | No | No | ||||
| 122 | Yes | No | ||||
| 123 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 124 | No | No | ||||
| 125 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 126 | No | No | ||||
| 127 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 128 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 129 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 130 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 131 | Yes | No | ||||
| 132 | No | No | ||||
| 133 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 134 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 135 | No | No | ||||
| 136 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 137 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 138 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 139 | No | No | ||||
| 140 | No | No | Here is where the "HIDE" command was used | |||
| 141 | No | No | ||||
| 142 | No | No | ||||
| 143 | No | No | ||||
| 144 | No | No | ||||
| 145 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 146 | No | No | We are testing the idea that Promotion = function (Going to the training program). | |||
| 147 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| 148 | Yes | Yes | =CHISQ.TEST(actual_range, expected_range) | |||
| 149 | No | No | ||||
| 150 | No | Yes | Chi square test with Excel formula | |||
| Formula | =COUNTIF(c2:c151,$B$153) | |||||
| # | Promoted | Training Program | Formula | =CHISQ.TEST(C154:C155,D154:D155) | ||
| Yes | 83 | |||||
| No | 67 | p-value = | ||||
| Total | 150 | 0 | ||||
| In Per Cent | ||||||
| # | Promoted | Training Program | ||||
| Yes | 55.3% | |||||
| No | 44.7% | |||||
| Total | 100% |
ARE112 - Winter 2021 #A Analysis Project - Chi Square
ANOVA_DATA
| Item # | Week Code | Satisfaction Level | Office Code | Office | |||||||
| 1 | Week1 | 38 | 1 | Boston | Week # | Boston | Atlanta | San Diego | Seattle | ||
| 2 | Week2 | 40 | 1 | Boston | 1 | 38 | 42 | 44 | 31 | ||
| 3 | Week3 | 30 | 1 | Boston | 2 | 40 | 45 | 43 | 43 | ||
| 4 | Week4 | 42 | 1 | Boston | 3 | 30 | 44 | 40 | 44 | ||
| 5 | Week5 | 36 | 1 | Boston | 4 | 42 | 43 | 40 | 43 | ||
| 6 | Week6 | 41 | 1 | Boston | 5 | 36 | 46 | 37 | 36 | ||
| 7 | Week7 | 40 | 1 | Boston | 6 | 41 | 42 | 35 | 43 | ||
| 8 | Week8 | 42 | 1 | Boston | 7 | 40 | 37 | 37 | 46 | ||
| 9 | Week9 | 36 | 1 | Boston | 8 | 42 | 43 | 35 | 45 | ||
| 10 | Week10 | 41 | 1 | Boston | 9 | 36 | 46 | 39 | 46 | ||
| 11 | Week11 | 40 | 1 | Boston | 10 | 41 | 43 | 37 | 36 | ||
| 12 | Week12 | 35 | 1 | Boston | 11 | 40 | 42 | 36 | 38 | ||
| 13 | Week13 | 34 | 1 | Boston | 12 | 35 | 45 | 39 | 39 | ||
| 14 | Week14 | 41 | 1 | Boston | 13 | 34 | 39 | 40 | 40 | ||
| 15 | Week15 | 39 | 1 | Boston | 14 | 41 | 39 | 36 | 39 | ||
| 16 | Week16 | 42 | 1 | Boston | 15 | 39 | 44 | 44 | 38 | ||
| 17 | Week1 | 42 | 2 | Atlanta | 16 | 42 | 43 | 39 | 40 | ||
| 18 | Week2 | 45 | 2 | Atlanta | Average | 38.6 | 42.7 | 38.8 | 40.4 | ||
| 19 | Week3 | 44 | 2 | Atlanta | |||||||
| 20 | Week4 | 43 | 2 | Atlanta | Hide Command | ||||||
| 21 | Week5 | 46 | 2 | Atlanta | |||||||
| 22 | Week6 | 42 | 2 | Atlanta | |||||||
| 23 | Week7 | 37 | 2 | Atlanta | |||||||
| 24 | Week8 | 43 | 2 | Atlanta | |||||||
| 25 | Week9 | 46 | 2 | Atlanta | |||||||
| 26 | Week10 | 43 | 2 | Atlanta | |||||||
| 27 | Week11 | 42 | 2 | Atlanta | |||||||
| 28 | Week12 | 45 | 2 | Atlanta | |||||||
| 29 | Week13 | 39 | 2 | Atlanta | |||||||
| 30 | Week14 | 39 | 2 | Atlanta | |||||||
| 31 | Week15 | 44 | 2 | Atlanta | |||||||
| 32 | Week16 | 43 | 2 | Atlanta | |||||||
| 33 | Week1 | 44 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 34 | Week2 | 43 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 35 | Week3 | 40 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 36 | Week4 | 40 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 37 | Week5 | 37 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 38 | Week6 | 35 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 39 | Week7 | 37 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 40 | Week8 | 35 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 41 | Week9 | 39 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 42 | Week10 | 37 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 43 | Week11 | 36 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 44 | Week12 | 39 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 45 | Week13 | 40 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 46 | Week14 | 36 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 47 | Week15 | 44 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 48 | Week16 | 39 | 3 | San Diego | |||||||
| 49 | Week1 | 31 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 50 | Week2 | 43 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 51 | Week3 | 44 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 52 | Week4 | 43 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 53 | Week5 | 36 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 54 | Week6 | 43 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 55 | Week7 | 46 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 56 | Week8 | 45 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 57 | Week9 | 46 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 58 | Week10 | 36 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 59 | Week11 | 38 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 60 | Week12 | 39 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 61 | Week13 | 40 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 62 | Week14 | 39 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 63 | Week15 | 38 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| 64 | Week16 | 40 | 4 | Seattle | |||||||
| Average | 40.1 | ||||||||||
| Median | 40 |
ARE 112 Winter 2021 #A Analysis Project - ANOVA