edit my paper
DR AF
T
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
02
C O N T E N T S
C O
N T
E N
T S
CONTENTS 02
LIST OF TABLES 03
LIST OF FIGURES 03
ABBREVIATIONS 03
INTRODUCTION 04
OVERVIEW OF THE CITY 05
Historical Background 05
Geography and Location 05
Demographic Background 05
Socio-Economic Background 06
Trend of Urban Growth and Existing Spatial Plans 06
The Overall City Prosperity Index for Dammam 08
THE CITY PROSPERITY INDEX (CPI) ASSESSMENT 08
Analysis of the Productivity Index (PI) 09
Analysis of the Infrastructure Development Index (IDI) 10
Analysis of the Quality of Life Index (QoLI) 12
Analysis of Equity and Social Inclusion Index (ESII) 13
Analysis of the Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI) 14
Analysis of Governance and Legislation Index (GLI) 15
SWOT Analysis based on City Prosperity Index 16
LOCAL URBAN OBSERVATORIES 17
About Urban Observatories 17
Local Urban Observatory 17
Performance of Dammam Local Urban Observatory 17
REFERENCES 18
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
03 L
IS T
S
ABBREVIATIONS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
KSA Kingdom of Saudi Arabia CPI City Prosperity Index LUO Local Urban Observatories SWOT Analysis Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats Analysis UN-Habitat United Nations Human Settlements Programme MOMRA Ministry of Municipality and Rural Affairs FSCP Future Saudi Cities Programme GIS Geographic Information System GUO Global Urban Observatory NUO National Urban Observatory MDGs Millennium Development Goals PI Productivity Index IDI Infrastructure Development Index QoLI Quality of Life Index ESII Equity and Social Inclusion Index ESI Environmental Sustainability Index GLI Governance and Legislation Index
Table 1: Scale of Urban Prosperity 09 Table 2: Productivity Index (60.2%) 12 Table 3: Infrastructure Development Index (64.4%) 14 Table 4: Quality of Life Index (68.7%) 15 Table 5: Equity and Social Inclusion Index (84.9%) 16 Table 6: Environmental Sustainability Index (32.0%) 17 Table 7: CPI based SWOT Analysis 19
Figure 1: Population Pyramid for Riyadh 08 Figure 2: Land use and Urban Growth Limit 09 Figure 2: Scale of Urban Prosperity 11 Figure 3: Productivity Indicators 13 Figure 4: Infrastructure Development Indicators 14 Figure 5: Quality of Life Indicators 16 Figure 6: Equity and Social Inclusion Indicators 17 Figure 7: Environmental Sustainability Indicators 18 Figure 8: Organization Chart of the Local Urban Observatory 22
L I S T S
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
04
INTRODUCTION
The United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-
HABITAT) and Ministry of Municipal and Rural Affairs in the
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (MOMRA) jointly launched UN-
HABITAT Saudi Arabia Programme titled “ Future Saudi
Cities Programme (FSCP)”. The UN-HABITAT Office provides
technical support to the MOMRA and targets 17 key cities
in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The cities include Riyadh,
Makkah, Jeddah, Taif, Medina, Tabouk, Dammam, Qatif, Ihsa,
Abha, Najran, Jazan, Hail, Araar, AlBaha, Buraydah, and Sakaka,
to respond to national and local urban challenges.
UN- Habitat provides a new approach for measuring urban
prosperity: which is holistic, integrated and essential for the
promotion and monitoring of socio-economic development,
inclusion and progressive realization of the urban-related
human rights for all. This new approach redirects cities to
function towards a path of an urban future that is economically,
politically, socially and environmentally prosperous. The new
approach or monitoring framework, The Cities Prosperity
Index (CPI), is a multidimensional framework that integrates
six carefully selected dimensions and several indicators
that relate to factors and conditions necessary for a city to
thrive and prosper. The six dimensions include productivity,
infrastructure development, equity and social inclusion,
environmental sustainability, and urban governance. The
CPI uses the concept of The Wheel of Urban Prosperity and
the Scale of Urban Prosperity to enable stakeholders to assess
achievements in cities. The City Prosperity Index (CPI) not only
provide indices and measurements relevant to cities, but it is
also an assessment tool that enables city authorities as well
as local and national stakeholders, to identify opportunities
and potential areas of intervention for their cities to become
more prosperous.
Under the umbrella of FSCP, The UN-HABITAT and MOMRA
in cooperation with the city administration and the Local
Urban Observatory, have been working on developing urban
statistics and spatial information (Geographic Information
System) to provide relevant urban information that strongly
support decision-making process on urban development and
urban planning in the city.
This CPI Profile Report applies the CPI framework and provide
a summary of the basic information and urban statistics about
the City and gives an overview of the city’s achievements,
opportunities and potential areas that contribute to
its prosperity in areas such productivity, infrastructure
development, equity and social inclusion, environmental
sustainability and urban governance and legislation.
IMAGE
IMAGE
IN T
R O
D U
C T
IO N
Source: General Commission for Tourism & Antiquities
Source: General Commission for Tourism & Antiquities
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
05 O
V E
R V
IE W
O F
T H
E C
IT Y
O V E R V I E W O F T H E C I T Y
H I S T O R I C A L B A C K G R O U N D .
Dammam area was the site of several hamlets that depended on
fishing and pearls for their survival. Over a span of a little more
than half a century, the area has developed into a thriving hub of
industries, commerce and science, and home to more 1.7 million
people. A complete transformation of Dammam occurred after
the discovery of oil in commercial quantity in 1938, it was in
Dammam that ARAMCO dug the famous Dammam No. 7 well
that proved beyond doubt that the Kingdom possessed a large
quantity of hydrocarbons.
The discovery of new oil fields to the south, west and north of
Dammam in the 1940s and 1950s, combined accounted for
a quarter of the world’s proven oil reserves, this triggered a
building and construction boom in the city. Within just few
decades, the little fishing settlement grew to become the
capital of the Eastern Province and worldwide oil shipping hub.
G E O G R A P H Y A N D L O C AT I O N .
The city is located in the eastern Saudi Arabia on the Arabian
Gulf just 32ft (10m) above sea level. It is about 400 km east of
the capital city Riyadh and about 1230Km east of Jeddah. It
has a hot and dry desert climate, with average low temperature
of about 20 0C and average high of around 34 0C. Rainfall
in Dammam is generally sparse, and usually occurs in small
amounts especially between December and April, the annual
average rainfall is about 86mm. The city has a geographical area
of about 800km2, the boundaries of Dammam metropolitan
area extend and covers two other cities Dhahran and Khobar.
D E M O G R A P H I C B A C K G R O U N D .
Dammam city is the fifth largest city in the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia, the city population was 903,313 in 2010 and now
it’s estimated to approximately 1.7 million inhabitants. The
geographical land area of the city is about 562 km2 with a
population density of about 2000 inhabitants per square
kilometer.
The population of Dammam city alone is about 46% of the
population in the eastern region. The average house hold size
is 6.2 persons per household, same as the regional average but
higher than the national average which stands at 5.6 persons
per household. The chart below shows the trend of population
and the number of households in the city from 2010 to the
year 2025.
ା Figure 1: Trend of Population and Number of Households (estimates)
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
06
S O C I O - E C O N O M I C B A C K G R O U N D .
Dammam city, is the capital or the seat of administration
of Ash Sharqiyah Province, located to the far eastern side
of the Kingdom on the Arabian Gulf. The Eastern Province
of KSA is the heart of Saudi oil production and processing
industry. The Saudi ARAMCO runs the oil and gas sector as
a whole, from prospecting, exploring and extracting as well
as collecting, processing, refining, and finally distributing,
shipping and exporting . Consequently, the economy and
physical development of the city is mainly dependent on the
petroleum industry. A large proportion of population in the
entire metropolitan area works at Saudi Aramco and other
petroleum-related business activities. The average household
income in the city is very high estimated at about USD 4000
per month. The city also has a thriving manufacturing industry,
by the end of 2013 the eastern region has 1,492 productive
factories representing about 23.4% of the total number in the
Kingdom amounting to 6,364. The number of factory workers
in the Eastern Region is about 214,000 workers representing
around 25.8% of the total industrial manpower in the Kingdom.
O V
E R
V IE
W O
F T
H E
C IT
Y
T R E N D O F U R B A N G R O W T H A N D E X I S T I N G S PAT I A L P L A N S
In the early 1980s Dammam was a separate city but so close to Al Khobar and Dhahran, after years of rapid urban expansions witnessed in all parts of the Kingdom, the three towns inevitably merged into one, creating a single municipality known as Dammam Metropolitan Area. Dammam city is part of Dammam Metropolitan Area (DMA) which is the largest urban agglomeration in Easter province and one of the largest in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Urban growth in DMA has been rapid, the population has increased from 0.365 million inhabitants in 1974 and today the city is home to about 1.7 million people and is expected to reach 3.62 million people by 2040 .
The rapid growth has led to the formation of an agglomerated
urban mass in DMA, most of this growth was unplanned and
happened beyond urban limits set by Dammam Urban Planning
Department. Due to limited alternative options for investment
by the ordinary citizens, investing in housing has become the
preferred option for many of them. Private sector companies
have followed the same trend and is investing heavily into the
housing sector. Urban sprawl is a major problem associated
with the rapid development of DMA. The contiguous spatial
expansion of DMA has been extensive, outpacing the growth
of population, resulting in sprawling, low density development.
In 2003, only 8,900 out of 25,618 ha of land within the urban
boundary accounting for 35% were developed, leaving 16,700
ha of vacant land. The three main factors that are promoting
this growth can be identified as: the rapid expansion of the
economy; the speculative real-estate market and the limited
capacity of Dammam Urban Planning Department (DUPD) in
devising and imposing urban regulations (Abou-Korin, 2011).
Source: General Commission for Tourism & Antiquities
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
07 O
V E
R V
IE W
O F
T H
E C
IT Y
ା F
ig u
re 2
: L
a n
d u
se a
n d
U rb
a n
G ro
w th
L im
it
ା T
h e
f ig
u re
a b
o v
e i
s sh
o w
in g
t h
e t
re n
d o
f u
rb a
n g
ro w
th l
im it
c o
n tr
o l
a n
d l
a n
d u
se s
fo r
th e
c it
y o
f D
a m
m a
m .
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
08
Prosperity is about successfully meeting today’s needs without
compromising tomorrow and working together for a smart,
competitive economy, in a socially inclusive society and a
healthy, vibrant environment for individuals, families, and
communities.
In order to measure the current and future progress of cities
on the road to prosperity, UN-Habitat introduced a monitoring
framework: The Cities Prosperity Index. This index, along
with a conceptual matrix, The Wheel of Urban Prosperity,
are intended to help decision-makers and partners to use
existing evidence and formulate clear policy interventions
for their cities.
The UN-Habitat’s Cities Prosperity Index (CPI) allows
authorities and local groups to identify opportunities and
potential areas for action or adjustments in order to make
their cities more prosperous.
The City Prosperity Index (CPI) is a multidimensional
measurement framework that integrates several
dimensions and indicators that are not only related but
have a direct and indirect influence on each other on the
path to prosperity. These components are embodied in
the following six dimensions: Productivity, Infrastructure
Development, Quality of life, Equity and social inclusion,
Environmental sustainability, and Governance and legislation.
Since the indicators of prosperity are measured in different
units, the CPI computation starts with the standardization/
normalization of the indicators into values ranging between
0 and 1 ; the standardized values are aggregated stepwise to
create the single value called the City Prosperity Index.
The chart shows the six-point scale of urban prosperity. This
section applies the CPI framework, the concept of the Wheel
of Urban Prosperity and the Scale of Urban Prosperity to
conduct an assessment of the level of prosperity in the city.
The assessment provides an indication of the strengths or
weaknesses in the factors of prosperity (using the scale of
urban prosperity); it also provides an indication of the level
of achievement towards the set prosperity goals called
benchmarks (through the CPI scores); and highlights whether
there are disparities between and within the six dimensions
of prosperity (Wheel of Urban Prosperity-stressing balance).
An in-depth analysis of the findings will help to identify which
particular indicators and sub-dimensions contribute to high
or low values in each of the dimensions and the CPI scores.
T H E O V E R A L L C I T Y P R O S P E R I T Y I N D E X F O R D A M M A M
The city of Dammam has an overall prosperity index score of
53.5%, according to the above global scale of urban prosperity
the city is rated as having moderately weak prosperity.
Prosperity of cities require a good balance of all the indicators
of prosperity, it discourages a combination of indicators where
some are too low and others very high. This low rating of the
city is an indication that in as much as Dammam may be known
to have strong economic foundation, the city has more weak
dimensions that strong one.
This can be seen in the chart below where only two dimension
(equity and social inclusion as well as quality of life) can be
T H E C I T Y P R O S P E R I T Y I N D E X ( C P I ) A S S E S S M E N T
ା Figure 3: Scale of Urban Prosperity
T H
E C
IT Y
P R
O S
P E
R IT
Y I
N D
E X
( C
P I)
A S
S E
S S
M E
N T
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
09 T
H E
C IT
Y P
R O
S P
E R
IT Y
I N
D E
X (
C P
I) A
S S
E S
S M
E N
T
rated as moderately strong. However, the city seems to be
closer to achieving some balance than many other cities in
the kingdom; the advantage of having a balanced city is that,
despite low level of prosperity the citizens do not surfer
extreme deprivations. This is why it is advisable that in the
attempt to increase prosperity, strong factors can be held
constant while improving extremely low factors to acceptable
levels. Analysis in the next sections will dissect all the six
dimensions of prosperity and identify areas of strengths and
weaknesses for appropriate interventions.
Sub-Dimension Indicator Actual Units Standardized Comments
Economic Growth (90.5%)
City Product per Capita 25,969.07 USD (PPP)/
Inhab 71.5% Strong
Mean Household Income 49,168.00 USD(PPP) 100.0% V. Strong
Old Age Dependency Ratio 2.88 % 100.0% V. Strong
Employment (72.2%)
Employment to Population Ratio
54.91 % 54.9% M. Weak
Informal Employment 1.46 % 100.0% V. Strong
Unemployment Rate 5.01 % 61.8% M. Strong
Economic Agglomeration
(9.4%) Economic Density 80,232,270
USD (PPP)/ km2
9.4% V. Weak
ା Table 1: Productivity Index (57.4%)
A N A LY S I S O F T H E P R O D U C T I V I T Y I N D E X ( P I )
The productivity dimension measures how cities contribute
to economic growth and development, generate income,
employment and equal opportunities and how it provides
adequate living standards for its entire population. The city
has an overall productivity index of 57.4%, this means the
city is moderately weak in the prosperity scale. It also mean
that despite having very strong economic and employment
indicators, it has some weak areas which needs to be addressed
to make its productivity structure balanced.
Some of it very strong areas include economic growth
indicators (90.5%) and employment indicators with 72.2%.
The main source of weakness is its spatial distribution of
productivity which is extremely low below 10%. The low
spatial distribution of productivity can be associated with
the widespread urban sprawl in the city, urban sprawl has the
effect of draining the economy of a city. More specifically, the
good economic fundamentals in the city can be associated
with high city GDP, high mean household income and low old
age dependency ratio.
The employment situation in the city is as well generally good
but employment to population ratio is low or moderately
weak with 54.9%.
ା Figure 4: The City Prosperity Index Dimensions
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
10
The chart below clearly shows the disparities among the
indicators of productivity. It clearly indicates that to bring
balance in the productivity of the city, the focus should be on
increasing the population to employment ration and economic
density.
A N A LY S I S O F T H E I N F R A S T R U C T U R E D E V E L O P M E N T I N D E X ( I D I )
The infrastructure dimension measures how cities uses
available resources to deploy a functional and efficient
infrastructure. Physical assets and services such as piped clean
water, sanitation, electricity, road network, ICT are essential
in supporting the city population, economy, and ensure better
quality of life. The city has infrastructure development index
of 59.3%, therefore according to the global prosperity scale
it is rated as moderately weak.
Notwithstanding the general weakness, the city’s IDI has higher
number of strong sub dimensions than weak ones; the strong
sub dimensions include the housing infrastructure (86%), ICT
infrastructure (73%) and street connectivity infrastructures
(73%).
All the indicators under housing infrastructure are very strong
except low population density which may also be associated
with urban sprawl in the city. Social infrastructure indicators
are also very weak; the city has negligible number of public
libraries compared to its large population. The city has good ICT
infrastructure including very high access to the internet (98%)
and ownership of home computers (93%), however, internet
ା Figure 5: Productivity Indicators
speeds are still very low making internet usage costly to the
public. The main problem the city is facing regarding urban
mobility is lack of mass public transport system and low usage
of the available public transport system. Street connectivity in
the city is good but land allocated to streets is still low.
Source: General Commission for Tourism & Antiquities
T H
E C
IT Y
P R
O S
P E
R IT
Y I
N D
E X
( C
P I)
A S
S E
S S
M E
N T
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
11
Sub-Dimension Indicator Actual Units Standardized Comments
Housing Infrastructure (85.5%)
Access to Electricity 99.05 % 99.0% V. Strong
Access to Improved Sanitation 97.75 % 97.4% V. Strong
Access to Improved Water 98.00 % 96.0% V. Strong
Access to Improved Shelter 99.20 % 100.0% V. Strong
Population Density 3,089.53 Inhab/Km2 20.6% V. Weak
Sufficient Living Area 86.00 % 100.0% V. Strong
Social Infrastructure (22.1%)
Number of Public Libraries 0.06 #/100,000 inhab. 0.0% V. Weak
Physician Density 1.65 #/1,000 inhab. 44.2% Weak
ICT (73.2%)
Average Broadband Speed 4.00 Mbps 28.9% V. Weak
Home Computer Access 92.50 % 92.5% V. Strong
Internet Access 98.10 % 98.1% V. Strong
Urban Mobility (42.4%)
Average Daily Travel Time 22.15 minutes 100.0% V. Strong
Affordability of Transport %
Length of Mass Transport Network 0.00 Km/1M Inhab. 0.0% V. Weak
Road Safety (traffic fatalities) 10.19 #/100,000 inhab. 69.4% M. Strong
Use of Public Transport 6.10 % 0.3% V. Weak
Street Connectivity (73.4%)
Intersection Density 93.44 #/km2 93.4% V. Strong
Land Allocated to Streets 23.97 % 59.9% M. Weak
Street Density 13.38 Km/KM2 66.9% M. Strong
ା Table 2: Infrastructure Development Index (59.3%)
The bar chart below shows the level of disparity between the
indicators of the infrastructure development. It displays the
weak indicators which need to be improved while holding the
strong factors constant, to enable the city to attain higher levels
of prosperity. Some of the indicators which need urgent attention
include the following indicators, population densities, the number
of public libraries, physician density in the health sector, internet
speed, mass transport system, affordability of public transport,
use of public transport and land allocated to streets.
ା Figure 6: Infrastructure Development Indicators
T H
E C
IT Y
P R
O S
P E
R IT
Y I
N D
E X
( C
P I)
A S
S E
S S
M E
N T
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
12
A N A LY S I S O F T H E Q U A L I T Y O F L I F E I N D E X ( Q O L I )
The quality of life dimension measures the cities achievements in the provision of important amenities such as social services, education, health, recreation, safety and security required for high standard of living and enabling the citizens to maximize their individual potential and to lead long fulfilling lives. In general the quality of life in Dammam is rated as moderately high with cpi score of 62.3%; the high quality of life in the city can be attributed to the good healthcare system with 79.4% and very good safety and security with 92.7%. The city is doing well in the health care provision and this has led to high life
expectancy, reduced under five mortality rates as well as very high vaccination coverage. Safety and security in the city is exceptionally good and this is attributed to the efforts made to keep homicide at negligible level and very low number of theft cases in the city.
The city however, has weak areas such education provision (53.8%) and provision of public spaces in the city (23.2%). The weaknesses observed in the provision of education services are attributed to poor enrolment in early childhood education and low net enrolment in higher education; the other area that is reducing the quality of life in the city is lack of public spaces, public spaces are both scarce and inaccessible by the public.
Sub-Dimension Indicator Actual Units Standardized Comments
Health (79.4%)
Life Expectancy at Birth 73.80 years 71.9% Strong
Eradicate Maternal Mortality - #/100,000 live births
- -
Eradicate Under-5 Mortality 9.40 #/1000 live births 67.1% M. Strong
Vaccination Coverage 99.18 % 99.2% V. Strong
Education (53.8%)
Early Childhood Education 10.97 % 11.0% V. Weak
Net Enrolment in Higher Education
58.95 % 59.0% Weak
Literacy Rate 92.70 % 91.5% V. Strong
Mean Years of Schooling - % - -
Safety and Security (92.7%)
Homicide Rate 0.29 #/100,000 inhab. 100.0% V. Strong
Theft Rate 105.51 #/100,000 inhab. 85.4% V. Strong
Public Space (23.2%) Green Area per Capita 5.00 m2 / inhabitant 33.3% V. Weak
Accessibility to Open Public Space 12.98 % 13.0% V. Weak
ା Table 3: Quality of Life Index (62.3%)
ା Figure 7: Quality of Life Indicators.
T H
E C
IT Y
P R
O S
P E
R IT
Y I
N D
E X
( C
P I)
A S
S E
S S
M E
N T
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
13
The level of imbalance in development can be seen from the
heights of the bars in the chart above it is clear that there
are disparities between the indicators of quality of life. The
city has both weak and strong indicators in equal number, to
improve the quality of life the city, a decrease in the level of
disparities is require.
This will mean addressing the issue of under 5 mortality
rate, early childhood education, increase net enrolment in
higher education, increase green area per capita and ensure
accessibility to the public spaces.
A N A LY S I S O F E Q U I T Y A N D S O C I A L I N C L U S I O N I N D E X ( E S I I )
Cities which are socially inclusive and economically equitable
are more likely to be more productive and have higher living
standard and quality of life. The equity and social inclusion
dimension measure how a city distributes the benefits of
prosperity among its inhabitants.
No matter how high the productivity or average income
or good infrastructure a city has, no city can claim to be
prosperous when a segments of its inhabitants live in poverty
and deprivation.
The city of Dammam is fairly an inclusive city with ESII score
of 62.6%, therefore it has moderately strong rating meaning
fairly equitable and inclusive.The main sources of strength are
Sub-Dimension Indicator Actual Units Standardized Comments
Economic Inclusion (55.8%)
Poverty Rate 5.61 % 55.76 M. Weak
Social Inclusion (62.3%)
Slum Households 0.00 % 100.00 V. Strong
Youth Unemployment 35.60 % 24.50 V. Weak
Gender Inclusion (69.7%)
Equitable Secondary School Enrollment 0.95 0 - ∞ 94.72 V. Strong
Women in local government 44.03 % 88.06 V. Strong
Women in the workforce 13.11 % 26.22 V. Weak
ା Table 4: Equity and Social Inclusion Index (62.6%)
in gender inclusion and social inclusion with 69.7% and 62.3%.
Since the city has very high youth unemployment rate and
moderately high poverty rate, its economic inclusion rating
is weak. Unemployment rate among the youth and bringing
more women into the workforce are the biggest inclusion
challenges the city is facing.
Source: General Commission for Tourism & Antiquities
T H
E C
IT Y
P R
O S
P E
R IT
Y I
N D
E X
( C
P I)
A S
S E
S S
M E
N T
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
14
The chart below shows some disparities within the sub
dimension under the equity and social inclusion dimension,
to achieve higher prosperity and improve the balance among
the indicators then poverty rate in the city should be reduced
further, youth unemployment rate should be reduced and
increase the number of women in the workforce.
ା Figure 8: Equity and Social Inclusion Indicators.
A N A LY S I S O F T H E E N V I R O N M E N TA L S U S TA I N A B I L I T Y I N D E X ( E S I )
Prosperous cities ensure that as they grow and develop
economically and economically the city’s environment is not
destroyed or degraded but remains healthy and liveable; the
city’s natural assets and resources are preserved for posterity
for the sake of sustainable urbanization. The findings in the
table below shows that the city generally performs poorly in
ensuring a balanced and sustainable environment; the city
has an ESI score of 45% which gives it a weak rating. Like all
other cities in Saudi, Dammam do not have renewable sources
of energy. The other challenge the city is facing is recycling of
solid waste, although waste collection is very well managed,
waste recycling need to be established and well managed to
avoid ending up with unsustainable environment.
Sub-Dimension Indicator Actual Units Standardized Comments
Water and Energy (0.0%)
Share of renewable energy consumption
0.00 ug/ m3
0.0% V. Weak
Waste Management
(90.1%)
Solid Waste Collection 98.41 % 98.4% V. Strong
Solid waste recycling share %
Waste water treatment 81.70 % 81.7% M. Strong
ା Table 5: Environmental Sustainability Index (45.0%)
T H
E C
IT Y
P R
O S
P E
R IT
Y I
N D
E X
( C
P I)
A S
S E
S S
M E
N T
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
15
ା Figure 9: Environmental Sustainability Indicators.
A N A LY S I S O F G O V E R N A N C E A N D L E G I S L AT I O N I N D E X ( G L I )
Prosperous cities are best able to combine sustainability and
shared prosperity through effective urban governance and
transformational leadership. They deploy appropriate and
effective policies, laws and regulations, and create adequate
institutional frameworks with strong local institutions and
sound institutional arrangements. Governance and legislation
in the city is still very weak, going by the findings shown in the
table below, with a GLI score of 21.0%, the city of Dammam
can be said to have very poor governance and legislation
arrangements. Although it has good municipal finance
management system especially in terms of few number of days
(7days) require to register and start a business (73%), however
the setting still do not allow proper public participation and
accountability (5.6%). Other areas which may need to be looked
into under the city’s financial management include efficiency
in own revenue collection and efficiency in local expenditure.
ା From the figure above its shown that share of renewable energy and waste recycling need to be addressed to ensure more sustainable environment.
Sub-Dimension Indicator Actual Units Standardized Comments
Participation and Accountability
(5.6%) Voter turnout 5.60 % 5.6% V. Weak
Municipal Finance (36.5%)
Own revenue collection 17.00 % 0.0% V. Weak
Days to start business 7.00 Days 73.0% Strong
Local expenditure efficiency %
ା Table 6: Legislation and Governance Index (21.0%)
Good governance and legislation is vital for the success of
any city. Increasing space for more citizen participation in
electoral processes, access to information and strengthening
public institutions to have proper accountability, checks, and
balances can go a long way in making a city more and more
prosperous. All processes of governance and legislation need
financing, therefore, the city needs to put measures in place
to improve the management of municipal finance, especially
by increasing the level of own revenue collection and ensuring
higher expenditure efficiency and financial accountability.
T H
E C
IT Y
P R
O S
P E
R IT
Y I
N D
E X
( C
P I)
A S
S E
S S
M E
N T
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
16
STRENGTH WEAKNESSES
1. Good economic growth fundamentals such as high economic productivity, high household income, low old age dependency ratio.
2. High literacy rate: the youth and women have untapped potential to contribute allot to economic growth. There is allot of unutilised skilled manpower (human capital) especially among women.
3. There is good safety and security and political stability which provide a conducive environment for growth and development.
4. There is good healthcare provision in the city: a healthy population is productive, happy and peaceful.
1. Low economic density- possibly due to urban sprawl leading to tracks of empty land: re-examine and establish need for increased densification of economic or commercial activities within the commercial, industrial and even residential areas in the city.
2. Use of public transport is very low and there is over dependence on private cars for transport even for short distances, not good for the environment and lack of physical activity is not good for health.
3. Low average bandwidth speed where there is high internet access and ownership of home computers results in discouraging internet usage.
4. Generally, housing infrastructure is good but there is a problem with access to sanitation facilities such as access to the sewerage system.
OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
1. High green area per capita and low accessibility means there are allot of green area that can be made accessible to the public.
2. This is the time to begin implementing programmes to promote the use of public transport system before the completion of Metro Train System.
3. High street intersection density and street density which should encourage alternative means of transport such as walking and cycling especially early morning and evening.
4. High internet access and ownership of home computers is a good opportunity to increase bandwidth and encourage more usage.
5. High productivity, good economic fundamentals, good safety & security and political stability in the city provide conducive environment for attracting foreign investments.
1. High investment is required to meet the needs of rapidly growing population.
2. There are other factors affecting the already low usage of public transport such as cultural and extreme temperature, unless they are appropriately addressed they may affect the usage of the Metro Train system as a public transport system when it is completed.
ା Table 7: CPI Based SWOT Analysis
S W O T A N A LY S I S B A S E D O N C I T Y P R O S P E R I T Y I N D E X
This section attempts to further analyse and breakdown the findings of the CPI and use it to identify areas of Strength, Weaknesses
or challenges, Opportunities for growth and possible Threats that the city may have so that appropriate recommendations
and actions can be designed.
T H
E C
IT Y
P R
O S
P E
R IT
Y I
N D
E X
( C
P I)
A S
S E
S S
M E
N T
ା Figure 10: Governance and Legislation Indicators.
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
17 L
O C
A L
U R
B A
N O
B S
E R
V A
T O
R IE
S
L O C A L U R B A N O B S E R VAT O R I E S
A B O U T U R B A N O B S E R VAT O R I E S
Urban Observatories is a global network with the following tiers: Global Urban Observatory (GUO) –Regional Urban Observatories (RUO) National Urban Observatories (NUO) Local Urban Observatories (LUO) (city level). NUOs are national platforms for policy information the country level, coordinated by GUO. LUOs are local platforms for policy information at city level, coordinated by National Urban Observatories.
The following are the main roles of Local Urban Observatories: Develop tools, collect and analyze their own urban indicators to monitor a range of local priority issues – e.g. social development, economic performance, service delivery; Establish permanent mechanisms for monitoring MDGs and Urban Development Indicators; Promote the use of urban data in planning and policy- making at local and national level and participate in addressing urban challenges resulting from urban development and population growth.; Disseminate information to strengthen transparency; Create a network of data management and flow from the sources and to the consumers; Help create or catalyse new partnerships between (National Statistical Office and local authority, Different municipal departments, Citizens and local authority); Establish strong links with local policy making processes.
According to a rapid survey conducted by UN-Habitat-KSA in June 2015 targeting 17 LUO/cities, it was found that only 15 LUOs exist. The findings showed that 88% of Local Urban Observatories are under Municipal Departments while 12% are under Authority Development. It also revealed that 71% of the Local Urban Observatories are Active while the operations of 23% are suspended due to staff/contractual arrangements. In terms of connections with the GIS departments, 59% of the LUOs have connections with the GIS department while 18% do not. The findings showed that 71% of the LUOs have GIS data while 6% do not have.
L O C A L U R B A N O B S E R VAT O R Y.
The Local Urban Observatory of Dammam was established in 2013 (2 years) as a department located within the municipality to be responsible for developing tools, collecting and analysing urban indicators at city level.
Dammam LUO has a total of 11 employees, of which 9 are Non-Saudi Consultants provided by a private consulting firm contracted to do technical management of the LUO, one is a Saudi consultant and the other is a government staff. The contract with the consulting firm has lasted 24 months now.
P E R F O R M A N C E O F D A M M A M L O C A L U R B A N O B S E R VAT O R Y
Dammam LUO has produced two rounds of indicators and now working on the third round of urban indicators, so far they have produced a total of 134 urban indicators. This puts Dammam LUO as the 5th best performing LUO after Makkah with 300 urban indicators, the other are Taif (221), Abha (140), and Skaka (137).
In addition to producing urban indicators, LUOs are also required to assist in the collection and production of CPI indicators, according to a rapid survey conducted by UN- Habitat-KSA in June 2015, Dammam had produced a total of 44 CPI indicators, by June 2016 it had produce 54 indicators out of possible 72 including demographic, this placed it at number 5 out of 17 cities with Abha leading with 60 indicators.
One survey has been conducted for producing the spatial indicators of the city of Mammam.
D A M M A M C P I P R O F I L E 2016
18
R E F E R E N C E S
• A. A. AlKhedheiri (2002) The Role of Secondary Cities in
the National Development Process of the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia.
• A. Al-Otaibi (2004) The Aspiration for Housing in Jeddah
Saudi Arabia. The university of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK,
Vol. 6, Issue 1, 2004.
• Abdul Salam et al (2014) Population Distribution and
Household Condition in Saudi Arabia: Reflection from 2010
Census, Springer Plus 2014, 3:530.
• A. A. Abou-Korin & F. S. Al-Shihri (2015) Rapid Urbanization
and Sustainability in Saudi Arabia: The Case of Dammam
Metropolitan Area. Journal of Sustainable Development;
Vol. 8, No. 9; 2015 ISSN 1913-9063 E-ISSN 1913-9071.
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education
• A. A. Salam (2013) Population and Household Census,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 2010: Facts and Figures. Center
for Population Studies King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi
Arabia. International Journal of Humanities and Social
Science Vol. 3 No. 16, August 2013.
• High Commission for the Development of Riyadh (2015):
ArRiyadh Urban Indicator 2013, http://www.arriyadh.com/
openshare/ar/Photos/----------/En-3-Big.jpg.
• I. E. Ascoura (2013) Impact of Pilgrimage (Hajj) on the Urban
Growth of the Mecca. Journal of Educational and Social
Research Vol. 3 (2) May 2013. ISSN 2239-978X
• J. Gamboa (2008), City Expanding to the Desert Horizon:
Riyadh’s problem of explosive growth and urban sprawl,
Geography 554
• R Rantala and F Al Mazroa (2011): Intersectoral Action in
Abha City, Saudi Arabia – A Healthy City Tackling NCDs.
World Health Organization Centre for Health Development,
Kobe, Japan and Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
• Saudi Arabia General Investment Authority (2014): Eastern
Region Economic Report 1434-1435-2014.
• UN-Habitat (2012) The State of Arab Cities 2012: Challenges
of Urban Transition, United Nations Human Settlements
Programme, Nairobi.
• UN-Habitat (2013) The State of the World Cities 2012/2013:
Prosperity of Cities, United Nations Human Settlements
Programme, Nairobi.
• UN-Habitat (unpublished) MEASUREMENT OF CITY
PROSPERITY: Methodology and Metadata.
• UNICEF and WHO (2013) IMMUNIZATION SUMMARY:
A statistical reference containing data through 2011. The
2013 Edition.
• Y. H. Yassin (2010) The UN-Support to the National Spatial
Strategy and Urban Planning Efforts of Saudi Arabia UNDP
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
• UN-Habitat NATIONAL SPATIAL FRAMEWORKS: Lessons
Learnt from International Experiences
• Dar Al Sahan (1995) Urban Development in Saudi Arabia:
Challenges and Opportunities. ISBN 9960-9054-0-3
R E
F E
R E
N C
E S
A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D
2016