Summary
|
|
Syllabus: Access Control, Authentication, and Public Key Infrastructure |
|
|
Course Summary
Course Number and Name
ITS835 Enterprise Risk Management
Course Term and Delivery
Fall 2019 – IG
Asynchronous Online Course
Course Instructor
Dr. Jamia Mills, Adjunct Professor
Email: [email protected]
Catalog Course Description
This course goes beyond looking at risk management from the confines of quantitative topics to cover the full spectrum of risks that may emerge in enterprises. It covers a more holistic approach that includes the decisions and actions of employees in an active enterprise. It uses case studies to demonstrate the issues and challenges in total risk management. Finally, the course explores techniques for balancing enterprise risk and reward to enable performance optimization.
Course Objectives
Upon completion of the course, students will be able to:
• Design and implement an appropriate ERM framework and risk governance structure customized to any type of organization.
• Conduct qualitative risk assessments to identify/prioritize key risks from among all risk sources.
• Quantify all types of risks, including strategic, operational, financial, and insurance.
• Develop a clear definition of risk appetite (the aggregate enterprise-level risk limit).
• Enhance strategic planning, increasing the likelihood of achieving strategic plan goals.
• Provide a rigorous business case for both business and mitigation risk-reward decision-making.
• Assure the board of directors that key risks are well understood and managed.
• Understand and satisfy ERM requirements from rating agencies, regulators, and shareholders.
Course Structure
· Watch weekly lecture
· Participate in class discussion via iLearn forums
· Reading assigned texts
· Complete quizzes based on assigned reading and lecture
· Complete cases based upon a given scenario
· Complete homework assignments from the text and other sources
Learning Materials and References
Required Resources
Textbook(s) Required:
Fraser, J., Simkins, B., & Narvaez, K. (2014). Implementing enterprise risk management: Case studies and best practices. John Wiley & Sons.
Evaluation and Grading
Course Assignments and Evaluation Criteria
Grading will be based on accumulated points of each graded requirement in the course distributed as described in the table below:
|
Required Assignments* |
||
|
Assignment |
Description |
Weight |
|
Research Papers |
Research papers will address topics discussed in the course. Students will write and add to the body of research which will help prepare them for future writing assignments. |
40%
|
|
Discussions |
Students will be required to create 1 new thread, and provide substantive comments on at least 3 threads created by other students |
32% |
|
Homework |
Students to provide a reflection on course topics via a paper. |
28% |
|
TOTAL |
|
100% |
* Assignments may change at the discretion of the professor and changes in the assignments will be announced in class. Students are responsible for noting and completing any changes in assignments.
Grade Conversion
The final grades will be calculated from the percentages earned in the course, as follows:
|
Grade |
Percentage |
|
A |
90–100% |
|
B |
80–89.5% |
|
C |
70–79.5% |
|
F |
<69.5% |
Course Expectations
Class Participation
Students are expected to:
1. Be fully prepared for each class session by studying the assigned reading material and preparation of the material assigned.
2. Participate in group discussions, assignments, and panel discussions. Initial post due by Thursday each week and 2 peer replies due Sunday each week. No late discussions will be accepted.
3. Complete specific assignments when due and in a professional manner. No late assignments will be accepted. If you can’t submit the assignment by the deadline please email the Instructor.
4. Take exams when specified on the attached course schedule
Academic Integrity
At a Christian liberal arts University committed to the pursuit of truth and understanding, any act of academic dishonesty is especially distressing and cannot be tolerated. In general, academic dishonesty involves the abuse and misuse of information or people to gain an undeserved academic advantage or evaluation. The common forms of academic dishonesty include:
a. cheating - using deception in the taking of tests or the preparation of written work, using unauthorized materials, copying another person’s work with or without consent, or assisting another in such activities
b. lying—falsifying, fabricating, or forging information in either written, spoken, or video presentations
c. plagiarism—using the published writings, data, interpretations, or ideas of another without proper documentation
Episodes of academic dishonesty are reported to the Vice President for Academic Affairs. The potential penalty for academic dishonesty includes a failing grade on a particular assignment, a failing grade for the entire course, or charges against the student with the appropriate disciplinary body.
Students with Disabilities
Students who may have a disability meriting an academic accommodation should contact Mr. Jacob Ratcliff, the Disabilities Services Coordinator, in the Student Services Office. For accommodations to be awarded, a student must complete an Accommodations Application and provide documentation of the disability to the Disability Services Coordinator. Any accommodations for disabilities must be re-certified each semester by the Academic Affairs Office before course adjustments are made by individual instructors.
Student Responsibilities
1. Students are expected to login several times per week to participate in class discussions.
2. Students are expected to find out if any changes have been made in the class or assignment schedule.
3. Students are expected to be self-motivating in an online, asynchronous course.
Tentative Course Outline*
|
Week # |
Lesson Topic |
Reading |
Activity |
|
1 |
ERM, Value, and Risk |
Chapter 3, “ERM at Mars, Incorporated: ERM for Strategy and Operations”
Chapter 5, “ERM in Practice at the University of California Health System”
|
Discussion Journal Reflection |
|
2 |
Strategic Risk Management |
Chapter 6, “Strategic Risk Management at the LEGO Group: Integrating Strategy and Risk Management” ▪
Chapter 9, “Lessons from the Academy: ERM Implementation in the University Setting” |
Discussion Journal Reflection |
|
3 |
Performance and Strategic Planning |
Chapter 12, “Measuring Performance at Intuit: A Value-Added Component in ERM Programs”
Chapter 15, “Embedding ERM into Strategic Planning at the City of Edmonton”
|
Discussion Journal Reflection |
|
4 |
Risk Management Special Cases |
Chapter 18, “BlueWood Chocolates” ▪ Chapter 19, “Kilgore Custom Milling |
Midterm Research Paper Practical Connection Assignment |
|
5 |
More Risk Management Special Cases |
Chapter 22, “JAA Inc.—A Case Study in Creating Value from Uncertainty: Best Practices in Managing Risk”
Chapter 25, “Uses of Efficient Frontier Analysis in Strategic Risk Management: A Technical Examination” |
Discussion Journal Reflection |
|
6 |
ERM Mini-Case Studies |
Chapter 26, “Bim Consultants Inc.” ▪ Chapter 27, “Nerds Galore”
Chapter 28, “The Reluctant General Counsel”
Chapter 29, “Transforming Risk Management at Akawini Copper”” |
Discussion Journal Reflection |
|
7 |
Other ERM Case Studies |
Chapter 30, “Alleged Corruption at Chessfield: Corporate Governance and the Risk Oversight Role of the Board of Directors”
Chapter 31, “Operational Risk Management Case Study: Bon Boulangerie”
Chapter 34, “Turning Crisis into Opportunity: Building an ERM Program at General Motors” |
Final Exam: Research Paper |
|
8 |
Wrapup |
|
Discussion Journal Reflection |
*ALL DUE DATES AND ASSIGNMENTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE
**All assignments are due in iLearn by 11:59pm EST on Sunday of the corresponding week…
EXCEPT the last week of class when all assignments are due on the day before the end of the term at 11:59pm EST.
© 2015 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
www.jblearning.com Page 1
Page 7