Cyber Vetting

profilejrdn12
CybervettingTheHiringProcessintheDigitalAge.pdf

Cybervetting: The Hiring Process in the Digital Age by Chelsea Dalgord

The digital age has provided people the opportunity to speak their minds and also share their thoughts, ideas and beliefs openly online. Social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter have created digital diaries where people share their opinions, life events and past mistakes. While social networking provides a chance to share with friends and family and make new acquaintances it also opens the door to the possibility of being cybervetted when applying for a job.

Cybervetting or online vetting is the “practice of using information found on the Internet to determine whether a person is a viable candidate for employment” (Donlon-Cotton, 2011). Cara Donlon-Cotton’s (2011) article “Using Social Networking for Cybervetting” explains, “Cybervetting is just another tool in the box to gather information about the person’s behavior. You’re looking to verify that the applicant’s behavior online is the same as you would expect in real life.”

There are hidden dangers of cybervetting that employers must be aware of including having the proper policies in place before cybervetting is practiced. Donlon-Cotton suggests that employers “need a policy that clearly states your agency will use cyber information as a supplement to pre­ employment and pre-promotion screening” (2012). She continues to explain that while cybervetting may help with the investigation of a job applicant, cybervetting alone cannot be relied on for the final decision about the applicant.

Howard Levitt from Financial Post discusses in his article “Cybervetting, or Invasion of Privacy?” (2012) that “it is important for an employer to establish objective criteria for evaluating applicants to show decisions were made without relying on illegal criteria”. The article makes the following recommendations for employers to obtain background information on possible job applicants without violating their right to privacy:

Create a formal guide for gathering information on potential hires; Access social media sites, including Twitter, Facebook, Linked In etc., but primarily as a background check rather than an evaluation tool; Use the same cybervetting criteria for each candidate; Proceed with caution — social media searches should exclude searching based on protected grounds; race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, age or disability. If you locate such information, ensure the decision to not hire is based on non-discriminatory objective information; Give the prospective employee an opportunity to explain any negative information;

Keep a record of the information used for hiring and the reasons for the decision (Levitt, 2012).

If employers have the proper policies in place cybervetting can be a beneficial tool for researching possible job applicants. An article by Yves Lermusi (2011) suggests “cybervetting will be used more and more by organizations, first to avoid surprises, and more as a digital background and fact checking tool. Second, it will be used as a way to assess the expertise, motivation, and in some aspects the character of the candidates. Finally, it will expand into leveraging the collective intelligence that social network contains.” He continues to explain that cybervetting will not be going anywhere and that it will continue to evolve in the future. Advice for job seekers: Remember to be careful about what you post on social networking sites such as Facebook or Twitter. You never know who might read something from your past that could impact your future.

“The past is never dead. It’s not even past.”- William Faulkner

References Images from http://freedigitalphotos.net Donlon-Cotton, Cara. (2011). Using Social Netwroking for Cybervetting. Law & Order. 59.12. 14-15. Faulkner, William. (1950). Requiem for a Nun. New York: Random House. Lermusi, Yves. (2011). Cyber-vetting’s Usage, Risk and Future. Retrieved on October 25th, 2011 from http://www.ere.net/2011/09/14/cyber-vettings-usage-risk-and-future/ Levitt, Howard. (2012). Cybervetting, or invasion of privacy. Financial Post. Retrieved on October 25th, 2011 from http://business.financialpost.com/2012/08/14/cvbervetting-or-invasion-of- privacy/

Accessibility Report

Filename:
rba09-sb4converted (003).pdf
Report created by:
Organization:

[Enter personal and organization information through the Preferences > Identity dialog.]

Summary

The checker found no problems in this document.

  • Needs manual check: 1
  • Passed manually: 1
  • Failed manually: 0
  • Skipped: 1
  • Passed: 29
  • Failed: 0

Detailed Report

Document

Rule Name Status Description
Accessibility permission flag Passed Accessibility permission flag must be set
Image-only PDF Passed Document is not image-only PDF
Tagged PDF Passed Document is tagged PDF
Logical Reading Order Needs manual check Document structure provides a logical reading order
Primary language Passed Text language is specified
Title Passed Document title is showing in title bar
Bookmarks Passed Bookmarks are present in large documents
Color contrast Passed manually Document has appropriate color contrast

Page Content

Rule Name Status Description
Tagged content Passed All page content is tagged
Tagged annotations Skipped All annotations are tagged
Tab order Passed Tab order is consistent with structure order
Character encoding Passed Reliable character encoding is provided
Tagged multimedia Passed All multimedia objects are tagged
Screen flicker Passed Page will not cause screen flicker
Scripts Passed No inaccessible scripts
Timed responses Passed Page does not require timed responses
Navigation links Passed Navigation links are not repetitive

Forms

Rule Name Status Description
Tagged form fields Passed All form fields are tagged
Field descriptions Passed All form fields have description

Alternate Text

Rule Name Status Description
Figures alternate text Passed Figures require alternate text
Nested alternate text Passed Alternate text that will never be read
Associated with content Passed Alternate text must be associated with some content
Hides annotation Passed Alternate text should not hide annotation
Other elements alternate text Passed Other elements that require alternate text

Tables

Rule Name Status Description
Rows Passed TR must be a child of Table, THead, TBody, or TFoot
TH and TD Passed TH and TD must be children of TR
Headers Passed Tables should have headers
Regularity Passed Tables must contain the same number of columns in each row and rows in each column
Summary Passed Tables must have a summary

Lists

Rule Name Status Description
List items Passed LI must be a child of L
Lbl and LBody Passed Lbl and LBody must be children of LI

Headings

Rule Name Status Description
Appropriate nesting Passed Appropriate nesting
Back to Top