Cyber Vetting
Cybervetting: The Hiring Process in the Digital Age by Chelsea Dalgord
The digital age has provided people the opportunity to speak their minds and also share their thoughts, ideas and beliefs openly online. Social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter have created digital diaries where people share their opinions, life events and past mistakes. While social networking provides a chance to share with friends and family and make new acquaintances it also opens the door to the possibility of being cybervetted when applying for a job.
Cybervetting or online vetting is the “practice of using information found on the Internet to determine whether a person is a viable candidate for employment” (Donlon-Cotton, 2011). Cara Donlon-Cotton’s (2011) article “Using Social Networking for Cybervetting” explains, “Cybervetting is just another tool in the box to gather information about the person’s behavior. You’re looking to verify that the applicant’s behavior online is the same as you would expect in real life.”
There are hidden dangers of cybervetting that employers must be aware of including having the proper policies in place before cybervetting is practiced. Donlon-Cotton suggests that employers “need a policy that clearly states your agency will use cyber information as a supplement to pre employment and pre-promotion screening” (2012). She continues to explain that while cybervetting may help with the investigation of a job applicant, cybervetting alone cannot be relied on for the final decision about the applicant.
Howard Levitt from Financial Post discusses in his article “Cybervetting, or Invasion of Privacy?” (2012) that “it is important for an employer to establish objective criteria for evaluating applicants to show decisions were made without relying on illegal criteria”. The article makes the following recommendations for employers to obtain background information on possible job applicants without violating their right to privacy:
Create a formal guide for gathering information on potential hires; Access social media sites, including Twitter, Facebook, Linked In etc., but primarily as a background check rather than an evaluation tool; Use the same cybervetting criteria for each candidate; Proceed with caution — social media searches should exclude searching based on protected grounds; race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, age or disability. If you locate such information, ensure the decision to not hire is based on non-discriminatory objective information; Give the prospective employee an opportunity to explain any negative information;
Keep a record of the information used for hiring and the reasons for the decision (Levitt, 2012).
If employers have the proper policies in place cybervetting can be a beneficial tool for researching possible job applicants. An article by Yves Lermusi (2011) suggests “cybervetting will be used more and more by organizations, first to avoid surprises, and more as a digital background and fact checking tool. Second, it will be used as a way to assess the expertise, motivation, and in some aspects the character of the candidates. Finally, it will expand into leveraging the collective intelligence that social network contains.” He continues to explain that cybervetting will not be going anywhere and that it will continue to evolve in the future. Advice for job seekers: Remember to be careful about what you post on social networking sites such as Facebook or Twitter. You never know who might read something from your past that could impact your future.
“The past is never dead. It’s not even past.”- William Faulkner
References Images from http://freedigitalphotos.net Donlon-Cotton, Cara. (2011). Using Social Netwroking for Cybervetting. Law & Order. 59.12. 14-15. Faulkner, William. (1950). Requiem for a Nun. New York: Random House. Lermusi, Yves. (2011). Cyber-vetting’s Usage, Risk and Future. Retrieved on October 25th, 2011 from http://www.ere.net/2011/09/14/cyber-vettings-usage-risk-and-future/ Levitt, Howard. (2012). Cybervetting, or invasion of privacy. Financial Post. Retrieved on October 25th, 2011 from http://business.financialpost.com/2012/08/14/cvbervetting-or-invasion-of- privacy/
Accessibility Report
- Filename:
- rba09-sb4converted (003).pdf
- Report created by:
- Organization:
[Enter personal and organization information through the Preferences > Identity dialog.]
Summary
The checker found no problems in this document.
- Needs manual check: 1
- Passed manually: 1
- Failed manually: 0
- Skipped: 1
- Passed: 29
- Failed: 0
Detailed Report
Document |
||
| Rule Name | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility permission flag | Passed | Accessibility permission flag must be set |
| Image-only PDF | Passed | Document is not image-only PDF |
| Tagged PDF | Passed | Document is tagged PDF |
| Logical Reading Order | Needs manual check | Document structure provides a logical reading order |
| Primary language | Passed | Text language is specified |
| Title | Passed | Document title is showing in title bar |
| Bookmarks | Passed | Bookmarks are present in large documents |
| Color contrast | Passed manually | Document has appropriate color contrast |
Page Content |
||
| Rule Name | Status | Description |
| Tagged content | Passed | All page content is tagged |
| Tagged annotations | Skipped | All annotations are tagged |
| Tab order | Passed | Tab order is consistent with structure order |
| Character encoding | Passed | Reliable character encoding is provided |
| Tagged multimedia | Passed | All multimedia objects are tagged |
| Screen flicker | Passed | Page will not cause screen flicker |
| Scripts | Passed | No inaccessible scripts |
| Timed responses | Passed | Page does not require timed responses |
| Navigation links | Passed | Navigation links are not repetitive |
Forms |
||
| Rule Name | Status | Description |
| Tagged form fields | Passed | All form fields are tagged |
| Field descriptions | Passed | All form fields have description |
Alternate Text |
||
| Rule Name | Status | Description |
| Figures alternate text | Passed | Figures require alternate text |
| Nested alternate text | Passed | Alternate text that will never be read |
| Associated with content | Passed | Alternate text must be associated with some content |
| Hides annotation | Passed | Alternate text should not hide annotation |
| Other elements alternate text | Passed | Other elements that require alternate text |
Tables |
||
| Rule Name | Status | Description |
| Rows | Passed | TR must be a child of Table, THead, TBody, or TFoot |
| TH and TD | Passed | TH and TD must be children of TR |
| Headers | Passed | Tables should have headers |
| Regularity | Passed | Tables must contain the same number of columns in each row and rows in each column |
| Summary | Passed | Tables must have a summary |
Lists |
||
| Rule Name | Status | Description |
| List items | Passed | LI must be a child of L |
| Lbl and LBody | Passed | Lbl and LBody must be children of LI |
Headings |
||
| Rule Name | Status | Description |
| Appropriate nesting | Passed | Appropriate nesting |