Cybersecurity testing and validation scheme
CYB- 690 Cybersecurity Test and Validation Scheme Scoring Guide
Performance Level Ratings
|
Meets Expectations
|
Performance consistently met expectations in all essential areas of the assignment criteria, at times possibly exceeding expectations, and the quality of work overall was very good. The most critical goals were met. |
|
Near Expectations
|
Performance did not consistently meet expectations. Performance failed to meet expectations in one or more essential areas of the assignment criteria, one or more of the most critical goals were not met. |
|
Below Expectations
|
Performance was consistently below expectations in most essential areas of the assignment criteria, reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made. Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas. |
|
Criteria |
Below Expectations
|
Near Expectations
|
Meets Expectations
|
Earned |
|
The student accurately creates a matrix of requirements with pass/fail criteria based on the organizations framework controls making sure to include: |
|
|
|
|
|
Five technical controls specified within your guiding framework. If your guiding framework does not have technical controls enumerated, use NIST Special publication 800-53 and select technical controls appropriate for your organization. |
0 pts – 20 pts |
21 pts – 29 pts |
30 pts |
|
|
Using your design/architecture, create test cases for each of the five technical controls that are appropriate for your design. |
0 pts – 20 pts |
21 pts – 29 pts |
30 pts |
|
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures, figures of speech, and industry terminology. |
0 pts – 2 pts |
3 pts – 4 pts |
5 pts |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
/65 |
|
Instructor Feedback
|