Test and Validation Scheme

profileRipple32
CYB-690-RS-CybersecurityTestValidationScheme-ScoringGuide.docx

CYB- 690 Cybersecurity Test and Validation Scheme Scoring Guide

Performance Level Ratings

Meets Expectations

Performance consistently met expectations in all essential areas of the assignment criteria, at times possibly exceeding expectations, and the quality of work overall was very good. The most critical goals were met.

Near Expectations

Performance did not consistently meet expectations. Performance failed to meet expectations in one or more essential areas of the assignment criteria, one or more of the most critical goals were not met.

Below Expectations

Performance was consistently below expectations in most essential areas of the assignment criteria, reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made. Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas.

Criteria

Below Expectations

Near Expectations

Meets Expectations

Earned

The student accurately creates a matrix of requirements with pass/fail criteria based on the organizations framework controls making sure to include:

Five technical controls specified within your guiding framework. If your guiding framework does not have technical controls enumerated, use NIST Special publication 800-53 and select technical controls appropriate for your organization.

0 pts – 20 pts

21 pts – 29 pts

30 pts

Using your design/architecture, create test cases for each of the five technical controls that are appropriate for your design.

0 pts – 20 pts

21 pts – 29 pts

30 pts

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures, figures of speech, and industry terminology.

0 pts – 2 pts

3 pts – 4 pts

5 pts

TOTAL

/65

Instructor Feedback

© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.