CYB-535-RS-QuantifySystem-ScoringGuide.docx
Quantify the System Scoring Guide
Performance Level Ratings
|
Meets Expectations
|
Performance consistently met expectations in all essential areas of the assignment criteria, at times possibly exceeding expectations, and the quality of work overall was very good. The most critical goals were met.
|
|
Near Expectations
|
Performance did not consistently meet expectations. Performance failed to meet expectations in one or more essential areas of the assignment criteria, one or more of the most critical goals were not met.
|
|
Below Expectations
|
Performance was consistently below expectations in most essential areas of the assignment criteria, reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made. Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas.
|
|
Criteria
|
Below Expectations
|
Near Expectations
|
Meets Expectations
|
Earned
|
|
The student successfully uses NMAP to quantify a home or work network. Appropriate screenshots are submitted.
|
0 pts – 9 pts
|
10 pts – 14 pts
|
15 pts
|
|
|
The student comprehensively presents the number and type of systems attached to the network. Subject knowledge is excellent.
|
0 pts – 9 pts
|
10 pts – 14 pts
|
15 pts
|
|
|
The student clearly presents what is on the network with extensive details.
|
0 pts – 9 pts
|
10 pts – 14 pts
|
15 pts
|
|
|
The student accurately describes who is on the network.
|
0 pts – 9 pts
|
10 pts – 14 pts
|
15 pts
|
|
|
The student develops the findings report. The documentation is well presented
|
0 pts – 6 pts
|
7 pts – 9 pts
|
10 pts
|
|
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures, figures of speech, and industry terminology.
|
0 pts – 6 pts
|
7 pts – 9 pts
|
10 pts
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
/80
|
|
Instructor Feedback
|
© 2018. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.