cbyber

profileluckyqloo
CYB-535-RS-QuantifySystem-ScoringGuide.docx

Quantify the System Scoring Guide

Performance Level Ratings

Meets Expectations

Performance consistently met expectations in all essential areas of the assignment criteria, at times possibly exceeding expectations, and the quality of work overall was very good. The most critical goals were met.

Near Expectations

Performance did not consistently meet expectations. Performance failed to meet expectations in one or more essential areas of the assignment criteria, one or more of the most critical goals were not met.

Below Expectations

Performance was consistently below expectations in most essential areas of the assignment criteria, reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made. Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas.

Criteria

Below Expectations

Near Expectations

Meets Expectations

Earned

The student successfully uses NMAP to quantify a home or work network. Appropriate screenshots are submitted.

0 pts – 9 pts

10 pts – 14 pts

15 pts

The student comprehensively presents the number and type of systems attached to the network. Subject knowledge is excellent.

0 pts – 9 pts

10 pts – 14 pts

15 pts

The student clearly presents what is on the network with extensive details.

0 pts – 9 pts

10 pts – 14 pts

15 pts

The student accurately describes who is on the network.

0 pts – 9 pts

10 pts – 14 pts

15 pts

The student develops the findings report. The documentation is well presented

0 pts – 6 pts

7 pts – 9 pts

10 pts

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures, figures of speech, and industry terminology.

0 pts – 6 pts

7 pts – 9 pts

10 pts

TOTAL

/80

Instructor Feedback

© 2018. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.