Benchmark - Framework Findings and Recommendations
Framework Findings and Recommendations Scoring Guide
Performance Level Ratings
|
Criteria |
Below Expectations |
Near Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Earned |
|
The student comprehensively presents an overview of why the report is being written. |
0 pts – 6 pts |
7 pts – 9 pts |
10 pts |
|
|
The student comprehensively presents a description of the system and the framework governing the enterprise. Subject knowledge is excellent. |
0 pts – 6 pts |
7 pts – 9 pts |
10 pts |
|
|
The student clearly presents the results of the assessment with extensive details, including the major gaps found and recommended remediation. |
0 pts – 13 pts |
14 pts – 19 pts |
20 pts |
|
|
The student provides a detailed, high-level diagram that represents the current state of the system. The student uses appropriate graphic elements to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts and relationships. |
0 pts – 13 pts |
14 pts – 19 pts |
20 pts |
|
|
The student provides an equal detailed diagram depicting the proper end state. The student uses appropriate graphic elements to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts and relationships. |
0 pts – 13 pts |
14 pts – 19 pts |
20 pts |
|
|
Required components are present, including: · Overview · System Overview · Assessment Methodology · Security Assessment Results · Non-Conforming Controls · Authorization Recommendations · Appropriate Diagrams and Screenshots |
0 pts – 6 pts |
7 pts – 9 pts |
10 pts |
|
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures, figures of speech, and industry terminology. |
0 pts – 6 pts |
7 pts – 9 pts |
10 pts |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
/100 |
|
Instructor Feedback
|
© 2018. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.