WORKSHEET

YenRose99

CWV-101Rubric-FindingYourPurpose.pdf

Home >Psychology homework help >WORKSHEET

Finding Your Purpose - Rubric

Missio Dei Concept 9 points

Criteria Description

Summary of the concept of missio Dei

5. Target 9 points

(1) Response expresses an insightful, clear, and thorough

summary of the concept of missio Dei with deep

understanding. (2) Response includes supporting explanation

utilizing topic Resources and what was learned in this course.

4. Acceptable 7.65 points

(1) Response expresses a clear and complete summary of the

concept of missio Dei with an above-average understanding.

(2) Response includes supporting explanation utilizing topic

Resources and what was learned in this course.

3. Approaching 6.75 points

(1) Response expresses a clear and basic summary of the

concept of missio Dei. (2) Response includes minimal

supporting explanation or utilizes topic Resources and what

was learned in this course.

2. Insufficient 5.85 points

(1) Response expresses an incomplete or unclear summary of

the concept of missio Dei. (2) Response does not include

supporting explanation.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Response does not summarize the concept of missio Dei.

https://www.gce.com/

Finding Your Purpose Concept of Buechner 9 points

Criteria Description

Summary of the finding your purpose concept of Buechner and

how this aligns with how to live out personal worldview

5. Target 9 points

(1) Response expresses a clear and thorough summary of the

finding your purpose concept of Buechner and how this aligns

with how to live out personal worldview with insightful

understanding of finding personal purpose. (2) Response

includes supporting explanation utilizing Buechner.

4. Acceptable 7.65 points

(1) Response expresses a clear and complete summary of the

finding your purpose concept of Buechner and how this aligns

with how to live out personal worldview with above-average

understanding of finding personal purpose. (2) Response

includes supporting explanation utilizing Buechner.

3. Approaching 6.75 points

(1) Response expresses a clear and basic summary of the

finding your purpose concept of Buechner and how this aligns

with how to live out personal worldview with a basic

understanding of finding personal purpose. (2) Response

includes minimal supporting explanation or utilizes Buechner.

2. Insufficient 5.85 points

(1) Response expresses an incomplete or unclear summary of

the finding your purpose concept of Buechner and how this

aligns with how to live out personal worldview and does not © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

demonstrate an understanding of finding personal purpose.

(2) Response does not include supporting explanation.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Response does not summarize the finding your purpose

concept of Buechner and how this aligns with how to live out

personal worldview.

https://www.gce.com/

Origins and Human Purpose 9 points

Criteria Description

Description of how personal beliefs about origins contribute to

personal understanding of human purpose

5. Target 9 points

(1) Response expresses an insightful, clear, and thorough

description of how personal beliefs about origins contribute to

personal understanding of human purpose with deep

understanding. (2) Response includes supporting explanation

utilizing topic Resources.

4. Acceptable 7.65 points

(1) Response expresses a clear and complete description of

how personal beliefs about origins contribute to personal

understanding of human purpose with an above-average

understanding. (2) Response includes supporting explanation

utilizing topic Resources.

3. Approaching 6.75 points

(1) Response expresses a clear and basic description of how

personal beliefs about origins contribute to personal

understanding of human purpose. (2) Response includes

minimal supporting explanation or utilizes topic Resources.

2. Insufficient 5.85 points

(1) Response expresses an incomplete or unclear description

of how personal beliefs about origins contribute to personal

understanding of human purpose. (2) Response does not

include supporting explanation. © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Response does not describe how personal beliefs about

origins contribute to personal understanding of human

purpose.

https://www.gce.com/

Commandment to Love 9 points

Criteria Description

Description of how the commandment to love God and love

others as ourselves can be lived in and out of the workplace

5. Target 9 points

(1) Response expresses an accurate, clear, and thorough

description of how the commandment to love God and love

others as ourselves can be lived in and out of the workplace

with deep understanding. (2) Response includes supporting

explanation utilizing topic Resources and what was learned in

this course.

4. Acceptable 7.65 points

(1) Response expresses a clear and complete description of

how the commandment to love God and love others as

ourselves can be lived in and out of the workplace with an

above-average understanding. (2) Response includes

supporting explanation utilizing topic Resources and what was

learned in this course.

3. Approaching 6.75 points

(1) Response expresses a clear and basic description of how

the commandment to love God and love others as ourselves

can be lived in and out of the workplace. (2) Response includes

minimal supporting explanation or utilizes topic Resources

and what was learned in this course.

2. Insufficient 5.85 points

(1) Response expresses an incomplete or unclear description

of how the commandment to love God and love others as© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

ourselves can be lived in and out of the workplace. (2)

Response does not include supporting explanation.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Response does not describe how the commandment to love

God and love others as ourselves can be lived in and out of the

workplace.

https://www.gce.com/

Future Career Opportunity 18 points

Criteria Description

Description how future career can be an opportunity to help

others flourish, to be purposeful, and to do no harm

5. Target 18 points

(1) Response expresses an accurate, clear, and thorough

description how future career can be an opportunity to help

others flourish, to be purposeful, and to do no harm with deep

understanding. (2) Response includes supporting explanation

utilizing topic Resources or what was learned in this course.

4. Acceptable 15.3 points

(1) Response expresses a clear and complete description of

how future career can be an opportunity to help others

flourish, to be purposeful, and to do no harm, with an above-

average understanding. (2) Response includes supporting

explanation utilizing topic Resources or what was learned in

this course.

3. Approaching 13.5 points

(1) Response expresses clear and basic description of how

future career can be an opportunity to help others flourish, to

be purposeful, and to do no harm. (2) Response includes

minimal supporting explanation or utilizes topic Resources or

what was learned in this course.

2. Insufficient 11.7 points

(1) Response expresses an incomplete or unclear description

of how future career can be an opportunity to help others © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

flourish, to be purposeful, and to do no harm. (2) Response

does not include supporting explanation.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Response does not describe how future career can be an

opportunity to help others flourish, to be purposeful, and to

do no harm.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 3 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language

use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target 3 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language

choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 2.55 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice

and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching 2.25 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is

generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 1.95 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present.

Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede

meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure

errors are found throughout.

https://www.gce.com/

Format/Documentation 3 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college,

subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes,

references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and

discipline.

5. Target 3 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 2.55 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only

minor errors.

3. Approaching 2.25 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although

there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient 1.95 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are

missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are

evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources

is provided.

Total 60 points

https://www.gce.com/