Analysis of Curriculum Document

Name:

Section is present and addresses the guidelines

Section is present but does not adequately address the guidelines

Section is either not present or is present and falls short of addressing guidelines

Points Awarded

Overview of Curriculum Document: (Does the paper introduce and provide a brief overview of the curriculum document, which outlines the origin and intention of the document? Who wrote it? What did the curriculum author’s intend users to do with this document?)

2

1

0

Unpacking the Document: (When examining the document for clarity, usability, accuracy of content, design format, relevance to the lives of students/teachers, and learning objectives, what claims can the paper make about the quality of this document or what this curriculum document explicitly addresses (or implicitly leaves out)?)

6

4

2

Scholar Influence: (Which scholar(s) would align with or serve as inspiration for this curriculum document? Does the paper describe which scholar(s) might contradict or have issue with this curriculum document? What can be said about these scholars and the theories that they espouse as found in the curriculum document?) For example, you might ask yourself, “What would Ralph Tyler say about this document?”

6

4

2

Academic Writing:

5

The writing is clear and free of errors. The paper is written in APA format.

3

The writing includes some errors, is unclear at some point, or is not consistently written in APA format.

1

The writing is relatively unclear, includes multiple grammar errors or typos, and/or does not follow APA format.

Comments and Total Points