Culture Immersion Part 3

profileErichards2016
Cultural_Immersion_Project_Interview_Assignment_Grading_RubricPart3.docx

COUC 504 Cultural Immersion Project Interview Assignment Grading Rubric 120 POINTS TOTAL

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content 90

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Organization of the answers

19 - 20 points

There is a clear, logical flow to answers. Important themes are well-identified. Major points are stated clearly.

Major points are supported by interview experience as well as immersion events, scholarly sources, and/or Internet/media sources.

17 - 18 points

There is a somewhat clear, logical flow to answers. Important themes are well-identified. Major points are stated clearly.

Major points are supported by either interview experience, immersion events, scholarly sources, or Internet/media sources.

1 - 16 points

There is not a clear, logical flow to answers. Important themes are not well-identified. Major points are not stated clearly.

Major points are not supported by interview experience as well as immersion events, scholarly sources, and/or Internet/media sources.

0 points

The answers are poorly organized.

Content of the answers

Key Points Addressed

30 - 35 points

Answers reflect an excellent thoughtful analysis and exploration of key themes identified in the interview.

The person’s/couple’s culture is identified.

Description of the person’s/couple’s background is provided.

Discussion of the person’s/couple’s openness is included.

Key cultural events for the person/couple are identified. A sense of the person’s/couple’s acculturation level and cultural identity development is conveyed.

Analysis of your emotional response is included.

Insightful connection of your cultural background to your response is provided.

Discussion of how the interview expanded on information learned in Cultural Immersion Project Research Assignment and the Cultural Immersion Project Events Assignment is included.

Consideration of the culture via a biblical worldview lens is included.

Discussion of the part of the project you found most informative is included. In-text citations of sources and a reference page are included when appropriate.

25 - 29 points

Answers reflect a good and thoughtful analysis and exploration of key themes identified in the interview.

The person’s/couple’s culture is identified.

Description of the person’s/couple’s background is provided.

Discussion of the person’s/couple’s openness is included.

Key cultural events for the person/couple are identified. A sense of the person’s/couple’s acculturation level and cultural identity development is conveyed.

Analysis of your emotional response is included.

Insightful connection of your cultural background to your response is provided.

Discussion of how the interview expanded on information learned in the Cultural Immersion Project Research Assignment and the Cultural Immersion Project Events Assignment is included.

Consideration of the culture via a biblical worldview lens is included.

Discussion of the part of the project you found most informative is included. In-text citations of sources and a reference page are included when appropriate.

1 - 24 points

Answers reflect a poor analysis and exploration of key themes identified in the interview.

The person’s/couple’s culture is identified.

Description of the person’s/couple’s background is provided.

Discussion of the person’s/couple’s openness is included.

Key cultural events for the person/couple are identified. A sense of the person’s/couple’s acculturation level and cultural identity development is conveyed.

Analysis of your emotional response is included.

Insightful connection of your cultural background to your response is provided.

Discussion of how the interview expanded on information learned in Cultural Immersion Project Research Assignment and the Cultural Immersion Project Events Assignment is included.

Consideration of the culture via a biblical worldview lens is included.

Discussion of the part of the project you found most informative is not included. In-text citations of sources and a reference page are not included when appropriate.

0 points

The content is weak.

Content: Ethical and legal aspects, elements of common grace, significance of multicultural sensitivity

30-35 points

Ethical and legal aspects discussed thoroughly. Discussion on elements of common grace and significance of multicultural sensitivity for your work as a professional counselor (school, clinical mental health, marriage and family, addictions, etc.)

25-29 points

Some discussion of ethical and legal aspects. Some discussion of common grace and significance of multicultural sensitivity. Missing key aspects as related to one’s specialty.

1-24 points

Only one of the three aspects addressed: only ethical and legal aspects, or only elements of common grace, or only significance of multicultural sensitivity.

0 points

Not present, or insufficiently addressed.

Structure 30

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Mechanics

9 - 10 points

No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate.

7-8 points

Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate.

1-6 points

Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good.

0 points

Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are misused. Writing style is difficult to understand. Word choice is poor.

APA Format Elements

9 - 10 points

Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, Citations, Running head, and References are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. An Abstract is not needed

7-8 points

Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors. Cover page, Citations, Running head, and References are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font.

1 -6 points

Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page, Citations, Running head, and References are included though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect.

0 points

Citations are not formatted correctly. Cover page, Running head, and References are not included or not formatted correctly. Paper is not double-spaced, margins are incorrect, or font is incorrect.

Research Elements

9 - 10 points

Major points are supported by at least 2 scholarly sources and at least 2 Internet and/or media sources used in the Cultural Immersion Project Research Assignment.

7-8 points

Major points are supported by at least 1 scholarly source and at least 1 Internet and/or media source used in the Cultural Immersion Project Research Assignment.

1 - 6 points

Major points are not supported by scholarly sources and Internet and/or media sources used in project part 1.

0 points

Appropriate sources are not used or sources are lacking entirely. Reference page is incomplete or missing.

Total

Advanced 102 - 120

Proficient 84- 96

Developing 1 - 78

Not present

Professor

Comments