Threat Analysis and Exploitation
|
Running Head: After Action Report (AAR) |
1 |
|
|
|
Security Assessment Report (SAR) 2
threat analysis and exploitation
Jeremy McGary
Charlotte Olaniyi
Marcelina Swan
Tyler Twaddell
after action report (aAR)
Company name: CST 610 Team 1 Industry Sector: Financial Institution Period of Assessment: 1 February – 14 March 2023
Project 3
CST 610: Cyberspace and Cybersecurity Foundations
MARCH 14, 2023
University of Maryland Global Campus (UMGC) Professor Dr. Steven Richman
Table of Contents 1.0 BACKGROUND 4 1.1 Purpose 4 2.0 FINANCIAL SECTOR – JEREMY MCGARY 5 2.1 The Financial Services Threat 5 2.2 Financial Services Critical Infrastructure (CI) 5 2.3 Scope Covered In The After Action Report 5 3.0 ASSESSING SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY IN THE SPECIFIC EVENTS – ALL TEAM 1 MEMBERS 5 4.0 LAW ENFORCEMENT – MARCELINA SWAN 6 5.0 THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY – CHARLOTTE OLANIYI 6 5.1 Threat Actor Definition and Rationale 6 5.2 Tools, Techniques and Procedures Used By The Threat Actors 6 5.3 Threat Actors Lessons Learned 6 5.4 The Intelligence Community Recommendations 6 6.0 THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY CYBERTHREAT LIFECYCLE – ALL TEAM 1 MEMBERS 6 7.0 EXPLOITATION METHODS (HOMELAND SECURITY) – TYLER TWADDELL 6 7.1 Threats and Exploits In The Incident 7 7.2 Vulnerabilities In The Incident 7 7.3 Countermeasures Taken In The Incident 7 7.4 Exploitation Methods Lessons Learned 7 7.5 Homeland Security Recommendations 7 8.0 HOMELAND SECURITY RISK AND IMPACT – ALL TEAM 1 MEMBERS 7 9.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS – ALL TEAM 1 MEMBERS 7 10.0 SUMMARY OF REFERENCES – ALL TEAM 1 MEMBERS 8
Table of Figures and Tables
No table of figures entries found.
1.0 BACKGROUND
According to our Project 3 assignment, Distributed Denial of Service attacks (DDoS), web defacements, sensitive data exfiltration and other attack vectors typical of nation state actor(s) on the U.S. financial network. The Team 1 collaborative efforts have found:
· The financial services sector discovered the network breach and the cyber-attacks.
· The law enforcement sector provided additional evidence of network attacks found using network defense tools.
· The intelligence agency identified the nation state actor from numerous public and government provided threat intelligence reports.
· The Department of Homeland Security provided the risk, response, and recovery actions taken as a result of this cyber threat.
Purpose
Our goal according to our Project 3 assignment is to provide education and security awareness to the financial services sector about the threats, vulnerabilities, risks, and risk mitigation and remediation procedures to be implemented to maintain a robust security posture, and take the lessons learned from this cyber incident and share that knowledge with the rest of the cyber threat analysis community using:
· Data and resources brought by each Team 1 representative.
· Test results from any prior lab testing done which is relevant to the financial institution. For example, leveraging network security skills by using past port scans, network scanning tools, and analyzing Wireshark files to assess any suspicious network activity and network vulnerabilities.
2.0 FINANCIAL SECTOR – JEREMY MCGARY
The Financial Services Threat
[Select and describe a specific, real, recent attack/network breach, “The Threat,” on a target financial institution or part of the financial services Critical Infrastructure (CI). The attack(s) could include distributed denial-of-service (DDOS) attacks, web defacements, sensitive data exfiltration, and/or other attack vectors typical of a nation-state actor per the given scenario in “Start.” This is your starting point and reason driving the Security Assessment Report (SAR) and is the specific focus of the After Action Report (AAR).]
· Describe the specific threat and impact on the specific financial institution or part of the financial services CI.
· Then describe the impact that the threat would generally have on the financial services sector.
· Provide relevant submissions from the Information Sharing Analysis Council related to the financial sector.
Financial Services Critical Infrastructure (CI)
· General Description of Financial Services Critical Infrastructure (CI) (include diagrams). Where or how does the target financial institution or part of the financial services CI fit into this?
· The importance and impact of Industrial Control Systems on the financial services CI.
· Other CIs which may be affected by attacks on the financial services CI (include diagrams)
Scope Covered In The After Action Report
· Include Why?
3.0 ASSESSING SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY IN THE SPECIFIC EVENTS – ALL TEAM 1 MEMBERS
· What were the critical information systems in the specific financial institution or part of the financial services Critical Infrastructure (CI) in your incident/event(s)?
· What cyberthreats and vulnerabilities were involved?
· What port scanning, network scanning and traffic analyzation tools and data were used to assess the suspicious network activity and network vulnerabilities? How were they used? (Use your lab experiences and lab data from your 600 and 610 courses to identify the tools and methods here and actual data throughout the report.)
4.0 LAW ENFORCEMENT – MARCELINA SWAN
· Describe the impact, if any, that the specific event(s) had on the law enforcement sector.
· How might this be mitigated or prevented?
5.0 THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY – CHARLOTTE OLANIYI
[Identify the nation-state actors involved in the specific event(s) and explain the different threat vectors they used.]
Threat Actor Definition and Rationale
· What nation-state or other threat actors were involved in the incident?
· What were their reasons for attacking the U.S. and its financial services institution or CI in the incident?
Tools, Techniques and Procedures Used By The Threat Actors
· What threat vectors did the cyber actors use in your specific event(s)?
· What cyber tools, techniques, and procedures did the nation state actors use in your specific event?
· What social engineering attacks may have been used in your specific event(s)?
Threat Actors Lessons Learned
· What was learned from successful attacks by the threat actors in your specific event(s)?
· What was learned from attacks by the threat actors that were successfully stopped in your specific event(s)
The Intelligence Community Recommendations
[Remember that there may be multiple methods of addressing any one threat actor or in different parts of the lifecycle. You should point these out select which method you recommend and justify why.]
6.0 THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY CYBERTHREAT LIFECYCLE – ALL TEAM 1 MEMBERS
· Provide an overview of the life cycle of the specific cyberthreats in your incident.
· What specific threat behaviors were observed in each part?
· What was in place or missing to defend and protect against the threat in each part?
· What methods were used to detect the threat, identify the threat, and perform threat response and recovery in each part? How successful were they? What was deficient?
7.0 EXPLOITATION METHODS (HOMELAND SECURITY) – TYLER TWADDELL
[Use the US-CERT and similar resources to discuss the vulnerabilities and exploits that might have been used by the attackers in your incident.]
Threats and Exploits In The Incident
· What threats and exploits to web applications were used in your specific event(s)?
· How successful were the potential exploits in your specific event?
Vulnerabilities In The Incident
· What web financial services application vulnerabilities were present in your specific event?
· How well were other potential web financial services application vulnerabilities addressed to secure the financial institution or financial services CI in your specific event?
Countermeasures Taken In The Incident
· What responses and risk mitigation steps were taken in your specific event? Include your assessment of those responses and risk mitigation steps? What was missing and what should be changed for the future?
· What security tools were used in your specific event? What was missing and what should be changed for the future?
Exploitation Methods Lessons Learned
· What was learned from successful exploitation of the financial institution or part of the financial services CI in your specific event(s)?
Homeland Security Recommendations
[Remember that there may be multiple methods of addressing any one exploit. You should point these out, select which method(s) you recommend and justify why.]
8.0 HOMELAND SECURITY RISK AND IMPACT – ALL TEAM 1 MEMBERS
(Identify risks created by threats exploiting vulnerabilities in your incident.)
· Provide the risks and impacts to the financial institution or financial services CI in your specific event?
· Provide a risk-threat matrix and the security posture snapshot for the incident in which the financial institution or part of the financial services CI was attacked.)
9.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS – ALL TEAM 1 MEMBERS
[What are your specific recommendations to the Financial Sector regarding the specific event(s), mitigation and prevention measures, and tools which should be used to address the future threats and vulnerabilities as in the incident? Base these on risk and impact, as well as the resources and time required to implement. Use of a table with discussion of key aspects can be effective.]
10.0 SUMMARY OF REFERENCES – ALL TEAM 1 MEMBERS
????? University of Maryland Global Campus (UMGC) (n.d.). Distributed Computing: In Depth. Retrieved from https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/scor/uncurated/cst/2215-cst610/learning-resource-list/distributed-computing--in-depth.html
????? University of Maryland Global Campus (UMGC) (n.d.). Operating System Fundamentals. Retrieved from https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/scor/uncurated/cst/2215-cst610/learning-topic-list/operating-system-fundamentals.html